Errata for the 2000 Review of Particle Physics
(Last changed August 29, 2001)
:
During the time between editions of the Review of Particle
Physics and the Particle Physics Booklet,
we often find
a number of errata. We correct most errata on our WWW pages.
If you should find errata that are not known to us,
please send mail to
pdg@lbl.gov.
We present the following errata along
with the corrected PostScript and PDF files:
Page 74 of the full Review
(Page 6 of the Booklet):
Astrophysical Constants
PS
PDF
-
(August 15, 2000):
The Value given for the Schwarzschild radius of the Earth was
off by a factor of 2. The correct value is:
Page 160 of the full Review
(Page 184 of the Booklet):
High-Energy Collider Parameters
PS
PDF
-
(November 30, 2000):
Some collider parameters for the DAPHNE Collider were incorrect.
-
Luminosity
-
Time between collisions (Changed on December 4, 2000)
-
Luminosity lifetime (hr)
-
Filling time (min)
-
Bunches per ring per species
-
Average beam current per species (mA)
Page 166 of the full Review
(Page 194 of the Booklet):
Passage of particles through matter
PS
PDF
-
(April 17, 2001):
In Section 23.4.1 Radiation length:
the expression for the e-folding distance is wrong (fifth/sixth lines):
-
It should read:
and the e-folding distance for pair production by a high-energy
photon is
9/7 X0.
(it had read 7/9 rather than the correct 9/7)
Page 169 of the full Review
(Page 197 of the Booklet):
Passage of particles through matter
PS
PDF
-
(December 15, 2000):
In the paragraph that contains Eq. 23.26, the expression for photon
energy is wrong. The sentence should read:
-
In amorphous media, bremsstrahlung is suppressed if the photon energy
k is less than <E2/ELPM[38] ...
(it had read > rather than <)
Page 353 of the full Review:
nu_mu Listings
PS
PDF
-
(September 6, 2000):
The heading for the nu_mu section should say:
-
Pending better understanding it is assumed that nu_mu
couples predominantly with
nu_2
(rather than nu_1).
Page 354 of the full Review:
nu_tau Listings
PS
PDF
-
(September 6, 2000):
The heading for the nu_tau section should say:
-
Pending better understanding it is assumed that nu_tau
couples predominantly with
nu_3
(rather than nu_1).
Page 360 of the full Review:
Note on Two-flavor Oscillation Parameters and Limits
PS
PDF
-
(September 6, 2000):
Two-Flavor Oscillation Parameters and Limits figure:
-
Limits for NOMAD and CHORUS were inadvertently omitted.
These figures appear correctly in the Booklet and web versions.
Page 381 of the full Review:
Note on Quark Masses
PS
PDF
-
(November 2, 2000):
Quark Mass Parameter Figure
-
The figures for the c mass and the b mass should have units of GeV,
not MeV as published.
Page 385 of the full Review:
b-Quark Mass
PS
PDF
-
(November 14, 2000):
b-Quark Mass: The value for BRANDENBURG 99 was in error:
-
The correct value is
3.8+0.77-2.0
(not 4.48+1.1-2.7 as published).
Page 483 of the full Review:
fJ(2220)
PS
PDF
-
(March 8, 2001):
The value for Gamma(pi pi) x Gamma(gamma gamma)/Gammatotal was in error:
-
The correct value is
<2.5 eV
(not <3.8 eV as published).
Pages 41,607,609 of the full Review
(Page 73 of the Booklet) for
B0
2001 PS
2001 PDF
(NOT Corrected on 2000 Web version)
-
(August 29, 2001):
Because the entry for ALAM 1994 was mistakenly left out of the
average for Gamma17, the calculated average was wrong.
-
Corrected in 2001 edition:
Page 6, for the Gamma17 Decay Mode:
Wrong: (6.8+-3.4)x10-3 Right: (7.3+-1.5)x10-3
-
Corrected in 2001 edition:
Page 16, similarly for the Branching Ratio:
Wrong: 0.0068+-0.0034 Right: 0.0073+-0.0015
Page 704 of the full Review:
N(1535)
PS
PDF
-
(November 27, 2000):
ABAEV 96 entry for the N(1535)
-
Added measurements of Gamma(N pi)/Gammatotal and
(Gamma i /Gamma j)1/2/Gammatotal
for N pi to N(1535) to N eta.
Page 753 of the full Review:
Lambda(1670)
PS
PDF
-
(November 27, 2000):
ABAEV 96 entry for the Lambda(1670)
-
Corrected measurement of
(Gamma i /Gamma j )1/2/Gammatotal
for N Kbar to Lambda(1670) to Lambda eta and corrected comment in all
entries for this paper.
Betty Armstrong
8-March-2001