# pdgfootnote

pdgid: S041S67
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <3.1E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ phi)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S68
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <2.1E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ phi)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S68
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <4.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ phi)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S69
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <2.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ Kbar0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S69
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <10.3E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ Kbar0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S70
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <3.1E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ Kbar0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S70
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <10.9E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ Kbar0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S89
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <4.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S90
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <4.3E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S71
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <1.1E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()- pi+ K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S72
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <1.6E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()- pi+ K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S73
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <8.6E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()- pi+ K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S74
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <1.1E-2 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()- pi+ K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041B40
text:
CHILIKIN 2019   reports [G(B+ --> eta_c K+)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)] = 39.4+4.1-3.9+2.2-1.8E-7 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-) = 3.7+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B40
text:
The ratio of B(B+- --> K+- eta_c) B(eta_c --> K Kbar pi) = 7.4+-0.5+-0.7E-5 reported in AUBERT,B 2004B and B(B+- --> K+- eta_c) = 8.7+-1.5E-3 reported in AUBERT 2006E contribute to the determination of B(eta_c --> K Kbar pi), which is used by others for normalization.


pdgid: S041B40
text:
AUBERT,B 2005L  reports [G(B+ --> eta_c K+)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)] = 1.8+0.3-0.2+-0.2E-6 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar) = 1.33+-0.11E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B40
text:
AUBERT,B 2004B  reports [G(B+ --> eta_c K+)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)] = 0.074+-0.005+-0.007E-3 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi) = 7.1+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B40
text:
EDWARDS 2001 assumes equal production of B0 and B+ at the Upsilon(4S). The correlated uncertainties (28.3)% from B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c) in those modes have been accounted for.


pdgid: S041Q96
text:
AUBERT 2007AV reports [G(B+ --> eta_c K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)] = 1.57+0.56-0.46+0.45-0.36E-6 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar) = 1.33+-0.11E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041BA2
text:
Measured relative to B+ --> J/psi K+ decay with charmonia reconstructed in p pbar final  state and using B(B+ --> J/psi K+) * B(J/psi --> p pbar)= 2.17+-0.08E-6. The last uncertainty includes the uncertainty of B(B+ --> J/psi K+) *  B(J/psi --> p pbar).


pdgid: S041BA2
text:
Measured relative to B+ --> J/psi K+ decay with charmonia reconstructed in p pbar final state and using B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.013+-0.034E-3 and B(J/psi --> p pbar) = 2.17+-0.07E-3.


pdgid: S041C65
text:
The first uncertainty includes both statistical and interference effects while the second is due to systematics.


pdgid: S041R3
text:
CHOUDHURY 2021 uses the relative production fraction of charged (f**+-) to neutral  (f**00) B mesons at Upsilon(4S) value of f**+-/f**00 = 1.058+-0.024.


pdgid: S041R3
text:
CHILIKIN 2019   reports [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)] = 56.4+3.3-3.2+2.7-2.5E-7 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-) = 6.0+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R3
text:
AUBERT,B 2005L  reports [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 2.2+-0.2+-0.1E-6 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R3
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 8+-2+-2E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R3
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J  reports 7+-3+-1E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041Q06
text:
AAIJ 2013S  reports [G(B+ --> eta_c K+)/G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 0.578+-0.035+-0.026 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar) = 1.33+-0.11E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S041R19
text:
ACOSTA 2002F uses as reference of B(B --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 10.1+-0.6E-4. The second error includes the systematic error and the uncertainties of the branching ratio.


pdgid: S041R19
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 1.2+-0.6+-0.4E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R19
text:
ALBRECHT 1987D  reports 1.2+-0.8E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R19
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J  reports <1.6E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971E-2.


pdgid: S041C3
text:
AUBERT 2006   reports [G(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] = 10.1+-2.5+-1.0E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C3
text:
AUBERT 2005R  reports [G(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] = 12.8+-4.1E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C3
text:
CHOI 2003   reports [G(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] = 13.6+-3.0+-0.5E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041P98
text:
AUBERT 2009B  reports [G(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi)] < 4.8E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi) = 10E-3.


pdgid: S041Q52
text:
Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S). The isovector-X hypothesis is excluded with a likelihood test at 1E-4 level.


pdgid: S041C85
text:
BALA 2015   reports [G(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K0 pi+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] = 10.6+-3.0+-0.9E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R65
text:
AUBERT 2007AV reports [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 3.78+0.72-0.64+0.28-0.23E-6 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R65
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 1.3+-0.9+-0.3E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R65
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J  reports 1.6+-1.1+-0.3E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041S98
text:
JESSOP 1997 assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S). The measurement is actually measured as an average over kaon charged and neutral states.


pdgid: S041A67
text:
AAIJ 2023AK measurements last uncertainty includes +-0.07 uncertainties on the branching  fractions of the intermediate resonances.


pdgid: S041B43
text:
ANASTASSOV 2000 finds 10 events on a background of 0.5+-0.2.  Assumes equal production of B0 and B+ at the Upsilon(4S), a uniform Dalitz plot distribution, isotropic J/psi(1S) and phi decays, and B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) phi K+)= B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) phi K0).


pdgid: S041T94
text:
Reported a threshold enhancement in the J/psi phi mass distribution consistent with the chi_{{c1}}(4140) state with a statistical significance of 3.1 standard deviations.


pdgid: S041C1
text:
SIRUNYAN 2019CM reports B(B+ --> J/psi Lambdabar p)/B(B+ --> J/psi K^*(892)) =  1.054+-0.057+-0.035+-0.011E-2 and rescaled with the best value of B(B+ --> J/psi K^*(892))  =1.43+-0.08E-3, where the last uncertainty is the uncertainty from the branching fractions of  Lambdabar and K^*(892) to reconstructed final states.


pdgid: S041B46
text:
AAIJ 2013S  reports [G(B+ --> psi(2S) K+)/G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] * [B(psi(2S) --> p pbar)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 0.080+-0.012+-0.009 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> p pbar) = 2.94+-0.09E-4, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S041B46
text:
Assumes B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) / B(psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = B(J/psi --> e+ e-) / B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.69+-0.19.


pdgid: S041B46
text:
AAIJ 2012L  reports 0.594+-0.006+-0.016+-0.015 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> psi(2S) K+)/G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] / [B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.94+-0.06E-2,B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.72+-0.17E-3, which we rescale to our best values B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2, B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.94+-0.22E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S041P29
text:
Measured using B+ --> psi(2S) K+ as a normalization channel. The second error represents total systematic uncertainties including those from branching fractions which were taken from  PDG 2016 as B(phi --> K+ K-) = 0.489+-0.005 and B(B+ --> psi(2S) K+) = 6.26+-0.24E-4.


pdgid: S041P29
text:
An upper limit on the fraction of the non-phi component in B+ --> psi(2S) K+ K- K+ decays  is set as 0.26 at the 95% confidence level.


pdgid: S041A20
text:
AAIJ 2020AI reports [G(B+ --> psi(3770) K+)/G(B+ --> D- D+ K+)] * [B(psi(3770) --> D+ D-)] = 14.5+-1.2+-0.8E-2 which we divide by our best value B(psi(3770) --> D+ D-) = 41+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041P44
text:
Measured relative to B+ --> J/psi K+ decay with charmonia reconstructed in p pbar final  state and using B(B+ --> J/psi K+) * B(J/psi --> p pbar) = 2.17+-0.08E-6.


pdgid: S041C88
text:
AAIJ 2022D  reports [G(B+ --> psi(4040) K+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(4040) --> J/psi eta)] = 8.53+-2.35+-0.30E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(4040) --> J/psi eta) = 5.2+-0.7E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C88
text:
IWASHITA 2014   reports [G(B+ --> psi(4040) K+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(4040) --> J/psi eta)] < 15.5E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(4040) --> J/psi eta) = 5.2E-3.


pdgid: S041T97
text:
AAIJ 2013BC reports [Gamma(B+ --> psi(4160) K+)]/Gamma(total)] x  B(psi(4160) --> mu+ mu-) = 3.5+0.9-0.8E-9 which we devide by our best value B(psi(4160) --> e+ e-) =   assuming lepton universality. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041T97
text:
AAIJ 2013BC reports [G(B+ --> psi(4160) K+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(4160) --> e+ e-)] = 3.5+0.9-0.8E-9 which we divide by our best value B(psi(4160) --> e+ e-) = 6.9+-3.3E-6. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
CHILIKIN 2019   reports [G(B+ --> chi_c0() K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)] = 3.7+1.2-1.0+0.2-0.3E-7 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-) = 2.1+-0.7E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
LEES 2011I  reports [G(B+ --> chi_c0() K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> pi pi)] = 1.53+-0.66+-0.27E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c0(1P) --> pi pi) = 8.6+-0.4E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
AUBERT 2008AI reports 0.70+-0.10+0.12-0.10E-6 for B(B+ --> chi_c0() K+) x B(chi_c0() --> pi+ pi-). We compute B(B+ --> chi_c0() K+) using the PDG value B(chi_c0() --> pi pi)= and 2/3 for the pi+ pi- fraction. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is  systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
AUBERT 2008AI reports [G(B+ --> chi_c0() K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> pi pi)] = 1.05+-0.15+0.18-0.15E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c0(1P) --> pi pi) = 8.6+-0.4E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
AUBERT,BE 2006M  reports [G(B+ --> chi_c0() K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] = 6.1+-2.6+-1.1E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 1.41+-0.09E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
AAIJ 2013S  reports [G(B+ --> chi_c0() K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar)] < 6E-8 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar) = 2.21E-4.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
WICHT 2008   reports [G(B+ --> chi_c0() K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma gamma)] < 0.11E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma gamma) = 2.06E-4.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
AUBERT,B 2005N reports 0.66+-0.22+-0.08E-6 for B(B+ --> chi_c()0 K+) x B(chi_c()0 --> pi+ pi-). We compute B(B+ --> chi_c()0 K+) using the PDG value B(chi_c()0 --> pi+ pi-) = 7.1+-0.6E-3 and 2/3 for the pi+ pi- fraction.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
The measurement performed using decay channels chi_c0() --> pi+ pi- and chi_c0() --> K+ K-. The ratio of the branching ratios for these channels is found to be consistent with world average.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
AUBERT 2004P reports B(B+ --> chi_c0() K+)xB(chi_c0() --> pi+ pi-) = 1.5+-0.4+-0.1E-6 and used PDG value of B(chi_c0() --> pi pi) = 7.4+-0.8E-3 and Clebsh-Gordan coefficient to compute B(B+- -> chi_c0() K+).


pdgid: S041B41
text:
ABE 2002B measures the ratio of B(B+ --> chi_c0() K+)/B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 0.60+0.21-0.18+-0.05+-0.08, where the third error is due to the uncertainty in the B(chi_c0() --> pi+ pi-), and uses B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 10.0+-1.0E-4 to obtain the result.


pdgid: S041D05
text:
The second uncertainty includes systematic and reference branching reaction of  B+ --> J/psi K+  uncertainties.


pdgid: S041R90
text:
CHILIKIN 2019   reports [G(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)] = 4.7+1.3-1.2+0.4-0.2E-7 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-) = 5.0+-1.9E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R90
text:
AUBERT,BE 2006M  reports [G(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] = 1.76+-0.07+-0.12E-4 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R90
text:
AUBERT 2002   reports 7.5+-0.9+-0.8E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B47
text:
AUBERT 2002   reports 0.75+-0.08+-0.05 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K+)/G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C73
text:
LEES 2012B  reports 0.501+-0.024+-0.028 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K0 pi+)/G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K0 pi+)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.4+-1.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B24
text:
WICHT 2008   reports [G(B+ --> eta^' K+)/G(total)] * [B(eta^'(958) --> gamma gamma)] = 1.40+0.16-0.15+0.15-0.12E-6 which we divide by our best value B(eta^'(958) --> gamma gamma) = 2.307+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B21
text:
WICHT 2008   reports [G(B+ --> eta K+)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] = 0.87+0.16-0.15+0.10-0.07E-6 which we divide by our best value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041T03
text:
AUBERT 2008AI reports [G(B+ --> f_0(1500) K+)/G(total)] * [B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi)] = 1.095+-0.315+0.705-0.72E-6 which we divide by our best value B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi) = 34.5+-2.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041T03
text:
AUBERT 2008AI reports B(B+ --> f_0(1500) K+) . B(f_0(1500) --> pi+ pi-) = 0.73+-0.21+0.47-0.48E-6. We divide this result by our best value of B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi) =  multiplied by 2/3 to account for the pi+ pi- fraction. Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best value.


pdgid: S041T03
text:
AUBERT,B 2005N  reports [G(B+ --> f_0(1500) K+)/G(total)] * [B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi)] < 6.6E-6 which we divide by our best value B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi) = 34.5E-2.


pdgid: S041T03
text:
AUBERT,B 2005N reports B(B+ --> f_0(1500) K+) . B(f_0(1500) --> pi+ pi-) <4.4E-6. We divide this result by our best value of B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi) =  multiplied by 2/3 to account for the pi+ pi- fraction. Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best value.


pdgid: S041R6
text:
Obtains the result from a Dalitz analysis of B+ --> K0S pi+ pi0 decays. The first error is statistical, the second combines all the systematic uncertainties reported in the paper, including signal modelling.


pdgid: S041R6
text:
AUBERT 2004P also report a branching ratio for B+ --> ''higher  resonances'' pi+, K* --> K+ pi-, 25.1+-2.0+11.0-5.7E-6.


pdgid: S041R6
text:
Uses a reference decay mode B+ --> Dbar0 pi+ and Dbar0 --> K+ pi- with B(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+).B(Dbar0 --> K+ pi-) = 20.3+-2.0E-5.


pdgid: S041R6
text:
ABE 2000C assumes B(Z --> b bbar)=(21.7+-0.1)% and the B fractions f(B0)=f(B+)= (39.7+1.8-2.2)% and f(B_{{s}})=(10.5+1.8-2.2)%.


pdgid: S041B60
text:
Assumes equal production of B0 and B+ at the Upsilon(4S); charm and charmonium contributions are subtracted, otherwise no assumptions about intermediate resonances.


pdgid: S041R32
text:
Calculate the total nonresonant contribution by combining the S-wave composed of K_{{0}}^*(1430) and nonresonant that are described using LASS shape.


pdgid: S041T34
text:
AUBERT 2008AI reports [G(B+ --> omega(782) K+)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-)] = 0.09+-0.13+0.036-0.045E-6 which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-) = 1.53+-0.12E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B59
text:
AUBERT,B 2004P also reports B(B+ --> ''higher f0 resonances'' pi+, f(980)0 --> pi+ pi-) = 3.2+-1.2+6.0-2.9E-6.


pdgid: S041B59
text:
Uses a reference decay mode B+ --> Dbar0 pi+ and Dbar0 --> K+ pi- with B(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+)xB(Dbar0 --> K+ pi-) = 20.3+-2.0E-5. Only charged pions from the f_{{0}}(980) are used.


pdgid: S041T00
text:
AUBERT 2008AI reports [G(B+ --> f_2(1270)0 K+)/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] = 0.75+-0.225+0.225-0.165E-6 which we divide by our best value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3+2.8-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041T00
text:
AUBERT 2008AI reports 0.50+-0.15+0.15-0.11E-6 for B(B+ --> f_2(1270) K+) x B(f_2() --> pi+ pi-). We compute B(B+ --> f_2(1270) K+) using the PDG value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)= and 2/3 for the pi+ pi- fraction. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is  systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041T00
text:
AUBERT,B 2005N reports 8.9E-6 at 90% CL for B(B+ --> f_2(1270) K+) x B(f_2(1270) --> pi+ pi-). We rescaled it using the PDG value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.7% and 2/3 for the pi+ pi- fraction.


pdgid: S041T00
text:
GARMASH 2005 reports 1.3E-6 at 90% CL for B(B+ --> f_2(1270) K+) x B(f_2(1270) --> pi+ pi-). We rescaled it using the PDG value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.7% and 2/3 for the pi+ pi- fraction.


pdgid: S041R72
text:
AUBERT 2008AI reports [G(B+ --> K_2^*(1430)0 pi+)/G(total)] * [B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi)] = 2.775+-0.615+0.915-0.435E-6 which we divide by our best value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = 49.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R72
text:
AUBERT 2008AI reports 1.85+-0.41+0.61-0.29E-6 for B(B+ --> K_2^*(1430)0 pi+) x B(K_2^*(1430)0 --> K+ pi-). We compute B(B+ --> K_2^*(1430)0 pi+) using the PDG value B(K_2^*(1430)0 --> K pi)= and 2/3 for the K+ pi- fraction. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R72
text:
AUBERT,B 2005N reports 7.7E-6 at 90% CL for B(B+ --> K_2^*(1430)0 pi+) x B(K_2^*(1430)0 --> K+ pi-). We rescaled it using the PDG value B(K_2^*(1430)0 --> K pi) = 49.9% and 2/3 for the K+ pi- fraction.


pdgid: S041R72
text:
GARMASH 2005 reports 2.3E-6 at 90% CL for B(B+ --> K_2^*(1430)0 pi+) x B(K_2^*(1430)0 --> K+ pi-). We rescaled it using the PDG value B(K_2^*(1430)0 --> K pi) = 49.9% and 2/3 for the K+ pi- mode.


pdgid: S041Q64
text:
GARMASH 2005 reports 2.0E-6 at 90% CL for B(B+ --> K^*(1410)0 pi+) x B(K^*(1410)0 --> K+ pi-). We rescaled it using the PDG value B(K^*(1410)0 --> K pi) = 6.6% and 2/3 for the K+ pi- mode.


pdgid: S041S09
text:
GARMASH 2005 reports 3.1E-6 at 90% CL for B(B+ --> K^*(1680)0 pi+) x B(K^*(1680)0 --> K+ pi-). We rescaled it using the PDG value B(K^*(1680)0 --> K pi) = 38.7% and 2/3 for the K+ pi- mode.


pdgid: S041S09
text:
AUBERT,B 2005N reports 3.8E-6 at 90% CL for B(B+ --> K^*(1680)0 pi+) x B(K^*(1680)0 --> K+ pi-). We rescaled it using the PDG value B(K^*(1680)0 --> K pi) = 38.7% and 2/3 for the K+ pi- fraction.


pdgid: S041B82
text:
Obtains the result from a Dalitz analysis of B+ --> K0S pi+ pi0 decays. The first error is  statistical, the second combines all the systematic uncertainties reported in the paper, including  signal modelling.


pdgid: S041P48
text:
Obtains the result from a Dalitz analysis of B+ --> K0S pi+ pi0 decays. The first error is statistical, the second combines all the systematic uncertainties reported in  the paper, including signal modelling.


pdgid: S041R73
text:
Assumes a helicity 00 configuration.  For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 4.9E-5.


pdgid: S041B62
text:
Charm and charmonium contributions are subtracted, otherwise no assumptions about intermediate resonances.


pdgid: S041B4
text:
AAIJ 2019AL reports 0.323+-0.015+-0.041 fit fraction for B+ --> K+ K- pi+ nonresonant  from the amplitude analysis of B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays. We use the PDG 2019 value  B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.2+-0.4E-6 to obtain B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+ nonresonant). Our  first error is the experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best  value.


pdgid: S041B38
text:
AAIJ 2019AL reports 7.5+-0.6+-0.5E-2 fit fraction for B+ --> K+ Kbar^*(892)0 from  the amplitude analysis of B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays. We use the PDG 2019 value B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) =  5.2+-0.4E-6 to obtain B(B+ --> K+ Kbar^*(892)0 , Kbar^*(892)0 --> K+ pi-). We compute  B(B+ --> K+ Kbar^*(892)0) using 2/3 of B(Kbar^*(892)0 --> ( K pi )^0 ) =  (99.754+-0.021)% for the K+ pi- fraction. Our first error is the experiment's error  and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C04
text:
AAIJ 2019AL reports 4.5+-0.7+-1.2E-2 for fit fraction for B+ --> K+ Kbar_0^*(1430)0 from the  amplitude analysis of B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays. We use the PDG 2019 value B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.2+-0.4E-6 to  obtain B(B+ --> K+ Kbar_0^*(1430)0 , Kbar_0^*(1430)0 --> K+ pi-). We compute B(B+ --> K+ Kbar_0^*(1430)0)  using 2/3 of PDG 2019 value B(K_0^*(1430)0 --> K pi) = (93+-10)% for the  K+ pi- fraction. Our first error is the experiment's error and the second error is systematic  error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041P74
text:
AAIJ 2019AL reports 0.307+-0.012+-0.009 fit fraction for B+ --> rho(1450) pi+ from  the amplitude analysis of B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays. We use the PDG 2019 value B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) =  5.2+-0.4E-6 to obtain B(B+ --> rho(1450) pi+ , rho(1450) --> K+ K-). Our first error is  the experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041P76
text:
AAIJ 2019AL reports 0.164+-0.008+-0.01 fit fraction for B+ --> pi+ ( K+ K- )_S-wave in  the region of 0.95 < m(K+ K-) < 1.42 GeV/c**2 from the amplitude analysis of  B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays. We use the PDG 2019 value B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.2+-0.4E-6  to obtain B(B+ --> pi+ ( K+ K- )_S-wave). Our first error is the experiment's  error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041A81
text:
Investigated the angular distribution of K+ K- pairs with invariant mass below 1.1  GeV/c**2,  which exhibits both a strong enhancement in signal and very large direct CP  violation.


pdgid: S041Q67
text:
GARMASH 2005 reports B(B+ --> f_2^'(1525) K+) . B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) < 4.9E-6 at 90% CL. We divide this result by our best value of B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) =  multiplied by 2/3 to account for the K+ K- fraction.


pdgid: S041Q67
text:
GARMASH 2005   reports [G(B+ --> f_2^'(1525) K+)/G(total)] * [B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar)] < 7.35E-6 which we divide by our best value B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8E-2.


pdgid: S041C9
text:
No evidence is found for such decay and set a limit on B(B+ --> f_J(2220))xB(f_J(2220) --> phi phi) <1.2E-6 at 90%CL where the f_{{J}}(2220) is a possible glueball state.


pdgid: S041B55
text:
Signal significance is 2.7 standard deviations. This measurement corresponds to an upper limit of  < 1.31E-6 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S041B55
text:
Assumes a helicity 00 configuration.  For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 4.8E-5.


pdgid: S041D06
text:
The second uncertainty includes systematic and reference branching reaction of B+ --> eta_c K+  uncertainties.


pdgid: S041C8
text:
Assumes equal production of B0 and B+ at the Upsilon(4S) and the phi phi invariant mass below 2.85 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S041B42
text:
No evidence for a nonresonant K pi gamma contamination was seen; the central value assumes no contamination.


pdgid: S041R35
text:
AAIJ 2019AL reports 0.075+-0.008+-0.007 fit fraction for B+ --> f_2(1270) pi+ from  the amplitude analysis of B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays. We use the PDG 2019 value B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) =  5.2+-0.4E-6 to obtain B(B+ --> f_2(1270) pi+ , f_2(1270) --> K+ K-). We compute  B(B+ --> f_2(1270) pi+) using 1/2 of PDG 2019 value of B(f_2(1270) --> K Kbar) =  (4.6+0.5-0.4)% for K+ K- fraction. Our first error is the experiment's error and the  second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R35
text:
AUBERT 2009L  reports [G(B+ --> pi+ f_2(1270))/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi+ pi-)] = 0.9+-0.2+-0.1+0.3-0.1E-6 which we divide by our best value B(f_2(1270) --> pi+ pi-) = 56.2+1.9-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R35
text:
AUBERT,B 2005G  reports [G(B+ --> pi+ f_2(1270))/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi+ pi-)] = 2.3+-0.6+-0.4E-6 which we divide by our best value B(f_2(1270) --> pi+ pi-) = 56.2+1.9-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R41
text:
The second uncertainty includes both systematics (+-0.09E-5) and possible interference with   B+ --> rho(1450)+ pi0   (+0.08).


pdgid: S041B28
text:
AAIJ 2019AL reports 0.3+-0.1+-0.1E-2 fit fraction for B+ --> phi(1020) pi+ from  the amplitude analysis of B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays. We use the PDG 2019 value B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) =  5.2+-0.4E-6 to obtain B(B+ --> phi(1020) pi+ , phi(1020) --> K+ K-). We compute  B(B+ --> phi(1020) pi+) using the PDG 2019 value of B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) =  (49.2+-0.5)%. Our first error is the experiment's error and the second error is  systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B28
text:
Measures B(B+ --> phi pi+ )/B(B+ --> phi K+ )< 0.018 at 90% C.L. and assumes B(B+ --> phi K+ ) = 8.8+0.7-0.6E-6.


pdgid: S041B56
text:
AMMAR 2001B searched for the two-body decay of the Bmeson to a massless neutral feebly-interacting particle X0 such as the familon, the Nambu-Goldstone boson associated with a spontaneously broken global family symmetry.


pdgid: S041P46
text:
AAIJ 2017AQ searched for a long-lived scalar particle X0 --> mu+ mu- in the mass range  250 -- 4700 MeV and lifetime range 0.1 -- 1000 ps. The limit is between E-7 and  2E-10 in these ranges except in vetoed mass regions around K(S)0, J/psi, psi(2S),  and psi(3770).


pdgid: S041P84
text:
Assumes equal production of B0 and B+ from Upsilon(4S) decays.  This measurement is quoted for M(pi+ pi0) < 1.3 GeV.


pdgid: S041BA1
text:
AAIJ 2013S  reports [G(B+ --> p pbar K+)/G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 4.91+-0.19+-0.14 which we multiply by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041Q46
text:
Uses B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.016+-0.033E-3, B(J/psi --> p pbar) = 2.17+-0.07E-3 and B(Lambda(1520) --> K- p) = 0.234+-0.016.


pdgid: S041Q07
text:
Explicitly vetoes resonant production of p pbar from charmonium states. The branching fraction for M(p pbar) < 2.85 GeV/c**2 is also reported.


pdgid: S041R23
text:
Statistical significance of the signal is 4.1 standard deviations where the the normalisation is  based on B(B+ --> KS pi+) = 11.895+-0.375E-06.


pdgid: S041Q11
text:
Excluding charmonium events in 2.85< mass(Lambda Lambdabar)< 3.128 GeV/c**2  and  3.315< mass(Lambda Lambdabar)< 3.735 GeV/c**2. Measurements in various mass(Lambda Lambdabar) bins are also reported.


pdgid: S041T72
text:
Uses B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 63.9+-0.5%, B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.89+-0.05%, and B(D0 --> K- pi+ pi0) = 13.9+-0.5%.


pdgid: S041T73
text:
CHEN 2011F  reports <4.8E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> p Lambdabar0 Dbar^*(2007)0)/G(total)] / [B(D^*(2007)0 --> D0 pi0)] assuming B(D^*(2007)0 --> D0 pi0) = 61.9+-2.9E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2007)0 --> D0 pi0) = 64.7E-2.


pdgid: S041B14
text:
AUBERT 2008BN reports 3.4+-0.1+-0.9E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B14
text:
GABYSHEV 2006A  reports 2.01+-0.15+-0.20E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B14
text:
DYTMAN 2002   reports 2.4+0.63-0.62E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B14
text:
GABYSHEV 2002   reports 1.87+0.51-0.49E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R07
text:
GABYSHEV 2006A  reports 5.9+-1.0+-0.6E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- Delta_X(1600)++)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R08
text:
GABYSHEV 2006A  reports 4.7+1.0-0.9+-0.4E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- Delta_X(2420)++)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R09
text:
GABYSHEV 2006A  reports 3.9+0.8-0.7+-0.4E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> ( Lambdabar_c()- p )_s pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C50
text:
AUBERT 2008BN reports [G(B+ --> Sigmabar_c(2800)0 p)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+)] = 0.117+-0.023+-0.024 which we multiply by our best value B(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+) = 2.2+-0.4E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B11
text:
DYTMAN 2002 measurement uses B(Lambda_c- --> pbar K+ pi-) = 5.0+-1.3%. The second error includes the systematic and the uncertainty of the branching ratio.


pdgid: S041R02
text:
AUBERT 2008H  reports 1.14+-0.15+-0.62E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambda_c()+ Lambda_c()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R02
text:
GABYSHEV 2006   reports 7.9+1.0-0.9+-3.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambda_c()+ Lambda_c()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041A71
text:
The second uncertainty includes both systematic (+-0.22) and the charm decay branching fraction   (+-0.25).


pdgid: S041P53
text:
The Xi_{{c}}(2930) is found in its decay to K- Lambda_c()+ in B- --> K- Lambda_c()- Lambda_c()+ with  a significance more than 5 sigma.


pdgid: S041B88
text:
GABYSHEV 2006A  reports 3.7+-0.7+-0.4E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Sigmabar_c(2455)0 p)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B79
text:
DYTMAN 2002   reports 4.4+-1.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Sigmabar_c(2455)0 p pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B76
text:
DYTMAN 2002   reports 4.4+-1.3E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Sigmabar_c(2455)0 p pi- pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B77
text:
LEES 2012Z  reports 2.98+-0.16+-0.15+-0.77E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Sigmabar_c(2455)-- p pi+ pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B77
text:
DYTMAN 2002   reports 2.8+-0.9+-0.5+-0.7E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Sigmabar_c(2455)-- p pi+ pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R04
text:
AUBERT 2008H  reports 2.51+-0.89+-0.61E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Xibar_c()0 Lambda_c()+  ,  Xibar_c()0 --> Xibar+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R04
text:
CHISTOV 2006A  reports 5.6+1.9-1.5+-1.9E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Xibar_c()0 Lambda_c()+  ,  Xibar_c()0 --> Xibar+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R05
text:
AUBERT 2008H  reports 1.70+-0.93+-0.53E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Xibar_c()0 Lambda_c()+  ,  Xibar_c()0 --> Lambda K+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R05
text:
CHISTOV 2006A  reports 4.0+1.1-0.9+-1.3E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Xibar_c()0 Lambda_c()+  ,  Xibar_c()0 --> Lambda K+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041D21
text:
LEES 2023C searched for psi_{{DS}}, where psi_{{DS}} is a dark sector antibaryon, in the  recoil mass against p and the fully reconstructed accompanying B meson. The cited upper  limit is for mass(psi_{{DS}}) between 1 and 4.3 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S041R55
text:
AAIJ 2015AR reports 1.83+-0.24+-0.05E-8 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> pi+ mu+ mu-)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] assuming B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.05+-0.05E-3,B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2, which we rescale to our best values B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S041R11
text:
Assumes equal production of B0 and B+ at Upsilon(4S). The second error is a total of systematic uncertainties including model dependence.


pdgid: S041P41
text:
Measured in amplitude analysis using model including short-distance K+ mu+ mu- and  rho(770), omega(782), phi(1020), J/psi, psi(2S), psi(3770), psi(4040),  psi(4160), and psi(4415) contributions.


pdgid: S041P28
text:
Uses only leptonic decays of tau and the quoted limit combines the final states K+ e+ e-,  K+ mu+ mu-, and K+ e+- mu-+.


pdgid: S041P28
text:
If observed events are interpreted as a signal the branching fraction measurement becomes 1.31+0.66-0.61+0.35-0.25E-3.


pdgid: S041B51
text:
Taking an average value from two methods, using (1) a hadronic tagging of the other B meson in  the event, and (2) an inclusive tagging method that exploits the inclusive properties of the other  B meson in the event.


pdgid: S041B51
text:
Using an inclusive tagging method that exploits not only the properties of the B+ --> K+ nu nubar decay,  but also the inclusive properties of the other B meson in the event.


pdgid: S041R82
text:
Assumes equal production of B0 and B+ at Upsilon(4S). The second error is a total of systematic uncertainties including model dependence. The 90% C.L. upper limit is 2.2E-6.


pdgid: S041T29
text:
Also reported a limit <11.6E-5 at 90% CL obtained using a fully reconstructed hadronic B-tag evnets.


pdgid: S041P75
text:
Signal candidates are identified by first fully reconstructing B+ in one of many possible  exclusive decays to hadronic final states.


pdgid: S041R60
text:
Uses B+ --> J/psi K+ , J/psi --> mu+ mu- mode for normalization. Obtains neutrino-mass-dependent upper limits in the range 0.4 -- 4.0E-9. This limit is applicable for Majorana neutrino lifetime < 1 ps.


pdgid: S041R60
text:
Uses B+ --> J/psi K+ , J/psi --> mu+ mu- mode for normalization. Obtains neutrino-mass-dependent upper limits in the range 0.4 -- 1.0E-8.


pdgid: S041BL5
text:
Uses B+ --> psi(2S) K+ , psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi- mode for normalization. Obtains neutrino-mass-dependent upper limits in the range 1.5 -- 8.0E-7.


pdgid: S041BL6
text:
Uses B+ --> psi(2S) K+ , psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi- mode for normalization. Obtains neutrino-mass-dependent upper limits in the range 0.3 -- 1.5E-6.


pdgid: S041T66
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011K  reports <6.1E-8 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambda0 mu+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda --> p pi-)] assuming B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 63.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 64.1E-2.


pdgid: S041T67
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011K  reports <3.2E-8 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambda0 e+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda --> p pi-)] assuming B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 63.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 64.1E-2.


pdgid: S041T68
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011K  reports <6.2E-8 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar0 mu+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda --> p pi-)] assuming B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 63.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 64.1E-2.


pdgid: S041T69
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011K  reports <8.1E-8 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar0 e+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda --> p pi-)] assuming B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 63.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 64.1E-2.


pdgid: S041D26
text:
The signals are reconstructed in decay chains: Xi_c()0 --> Xi- pi+ , Lambda0 K- pi+ , p K- K- pi+, and  Lambda_c()- --> pbar K0S , pbar K+ pi-.


pdgid: S041A39
text:
SIRUNYAN 2021AC measurement is performed in 1.0 < q**2 < 8.68 GeV**2/c**4. Reports also measurements in several other q**2 intervals.


pdgid: S041A49
text:
The full set of CP-averaged angular observables is measured as a function of the q**2.  The   measured Gamma(L) is related to the polarisation of the K^*(892)+.


pdgid: S041A40
text:
SIRUNYAN 2021AC measurement is performed in 10.09 < q**2 < 12.86 GeV**2/c**4. Reports also measurements in several other q**2 intervals.


pdgid: S041A41
text:
SIRUNYAN 2021AC measurement is performed in 14.18 < q**2 < 19.0 GeV**2/c**4. Reports also measurements in several other q**2 intervals.


pdgid: S041A50
text:
The full set of CP-averaged angular observables is measured as a function of the q**2. The   measured Gamma(L) is related to the polarisation of the K^*(892)+.


pdgid: S041AX1
text:
A +0.3% correction is applied due to a slightly higher reconstruction efficiency for the positive kaons.


pdgid: S041AC2
text:
Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of D0 --> pi+ pi- pi0. Also reports the one-sigma regions: 0.06 < r(B)< 0.78,  -30degree<gamma< 76degree, and -27degree<delta< 78degree.


pdgid: S041AY3
text:
Reports the first evidence for direct CP violation in B --> D K decays with 3.6 standard deviations.


pdgid: S041AY3
text:
AAIJ 2012M reports an evidence of direct CP violation in B+- --> D K+- decays with a total significance of 5.8 sigma.


pdgid: S041AA1
text:
The statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations  between the R(K)**- and R(K)**+ observables.


pdgid: S041AA2
text:
The statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations  between the R(pi)**- and R(pi)**+ observables.


pdgid: S041AD+
text:
Measures the asymmetry separately for K+ K- and pi+ pi- final states, A(K K) = 0.06+-0.07+-0.01and  A(pi pi) = 0.15+-0.13+-0.01, and combines the two results. The value of A(pi pi) was  updated in AAIJ 2018X.


pdgid: S041AY6
text:
The second error includes both systematics and the uncertainties from CP asymmetries in  restricted regions of phase space.


pdgid: S041CKK
text:
AAIJ 2014 reports A(CP)(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) = -0.648+-0.070+-0.013+-0.007 in the Dalitz plot region of mass**2(K+ K-) < 1.5 GeV**2/c**4. The third uncertainty is due to the CP asymmetry of the B+- --> J/psi K+- reference mode uncertainty.


pdgid: S041A82
text:
Investigated the angular distribution of K+ K- pairs with invariant mass below 1.1  GeV/c**2,   which exhibits both a strong enhancement in signal and very large direct CP  violation.


pdgid: S041A17
text:
Uses amplitude analysis of B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays in the pi pi - K K  rescattering mass region of 0.95 < m(K+ K-) < 1.42 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S041AY5
text:
AAIJ 2014 reports A(CP)(B+ --> pi+ pi- pi+) = 0.584+-0.082+-0.027+-0.007 in the Dalitz plot region of mass**2(pi+ pi-) > 15 GeV**2/c**4 or mass**2(pi+ pi-)< 0.4 GeV**2/c**4. The third uncertainty is due to the CP asymmetry of the B+- --> J/psi K+- reference mode uncertainty.


pdgid: S041CP4
text:
This result is obtained with an amplitude analysis of B+ --> pi+ pi+ pi- decays, using the isobar  model within the mass range 1.0 < m(pi+ pi-) < 1.5 GeV to describe the pi+ pi-  S-wave contribution.


pdgid: S041CR1
text:
Measured in the union of 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4. LEES 2012S reports also individual measurements A(CP)(B+ --> K+ lepton+ lepton-) = 0.02+-0.18+-0.01 for 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and A(CP)(B+ --> K+ lepton+ lepton-) = -0.06+0.22-0.21+-0.01 for q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses combined sample of Belle and Belle II experiments in B+ decays to D K+, D^* K+,  and D pi+ final states.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Extracted from yields of partially reconstructed B+- --> D^* K+-, D^* --> D pi0 / gamma , D --> K0S pi+ pi- / K0S K+ K-  decays. The uncertainty is predominantly statistical. Its correlation with the AAIJ 2023BA  result is found to be less than 3%.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
A model-independent binned Dalitz plot analysis of the decays B0 --> D K^*()0, with D --> K0S h+ h-,  h = pi, K. Angle gamma is required to satisfy 0 < gamma <  180 degrees.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Measured using B+- --> D^* K+- and B+- --> D^* pi+- decays analysing the signal yield  variation with the fully reconstructed D^* --> D pi0 / gamma , D --> K0S pi+ pi- / K0S K+ K-  decays. The model-independent approach uses external strong phase input from BESIII and CLEO  collaborations.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Measured using B+- --> D [ K-+ pi+- pi+- pi-+ ] h+- decays in bins of the phase  space of the D decay. The third uncertainty includes systematic and finite knowledge of the  D-meson decay parameters.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- and K0S K+ K- from B+- --> D K+-   modes. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c and BES-III of the D decay over the Dalitz plot   are used as input. Value is modulo 180degree.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
AAIJ 2021AM presents a combination of existing measurements from LHCb collaboration. It  includes also charm mixing  parameters.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Measured in B_s()0 --> D_s()+- K-+ pi+- pi-+ decays in restricted phase space with m(K+ pi+ pi-)  < 1950 MeV, m(K+ pi-) < 1200 MeV and m(pi+ pi-) < 1200 MeV.  The value is modulo 180degree.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
A model-independent coherence factor for the decay B_s --> D_s K pi pi (in the restricted phase   space region) is also reported.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses binned analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- pi0  from B+- --> D K+- modes over the phase  space. Strong phase measurements from RESMI 2018 analysis of CLEO-c data of the D decay  over the phase space binning are used as input.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- and K0S K+ K- from B+- --> D K+-  modes. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c of the D decay over the Dalitz plot are used as  input.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Measured in B_s()0 --> D_s()-+ K+- decays, constraining -2beta_{{s}} by the measurement of  phi_{{s}} = 0.030+-0.033 from HFLAV. The value is modulo 180degree.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
AAIJ 2018Z reports the intervals (5 -- 86)degree or (185 -- 266)degree at  68% C.L. The extraction uses the time dependent CP violation measurement in B0 --> D-+ pi+- decays  with external input and some theoretical assumptions.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- decays coming from B0 --> D K^*(892)0 modes. Measures r(B0) = 0.39+-0.13, and delta(B0) = 197+24-20  degrees.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
A combination of measurements from analyses of time-integrated B+ --> D K+, B0 --> D K^(*)()0, B0 --> D K+ pi-, and  B+ --> D K+ pi+ pi- tree-level decays. In addition, results from a time-dependent analysis of  B_s()0 --> D_s K decays are included.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
A model-independent binned Dalitz plot analysis of the decays B0 --> D K^*()0, with D --> K0S pi+ pi-  and D --> K0S K+ K-. The results cannot be combined with the model-dependent analysis of the  same dataset reported in AAIJ 2016AA.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- , K0S K+ K- decays coming from B0 --> D K^*(892)0  modes.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Obtained by measuring time-dependent CP asymmetry in B_s()0 --> K+ K- and using a U-spin  relation between B_s()0 --> K+ K- and B0 --> pi+ pi-.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Results are also presented using additional inputs on B0 --> pi0 pi0 and B+ --> pi+ pi0 decays from other experiments and isospin symmetry assumptions. The dependence of the results on the maximum allowed amount of U-spin breaking up to 50% is also included.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of B+ --> D K+ decays, with D --> K0S pi+ pi- and D --> K0S K+ K-. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c (LIBBY 2010) of the D decay over the Dalitz plot are used as input. Solution that satisfies 0 <gamma< 180 is chosen.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
AAIJ 14BE uses model-dependent analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- amplitudes. The model is the same as in DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010F.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Measured in B_s()0 --> D_s()-+ K+- decays, constraining -2beta_{{s}} by the measurement of phi_{{s}} = 0.01+-0.07+-0.0 from AAIJ 2013AR. The value is modulo 180degree at 68% CL.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Reports combination of published measurements using GGSZ, GLW, and ADS methods. Reports also 2sigma range of 41 -- 102degrees and a 5.9sigma significance for gamma(B+ --> D^(*)()0 K^(*)()+) not= 0 hypothesis.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot of Dbar0 --> K0S pi+ pi- decays from B+ --> Dbar0 K+.  Measurement of strong phases in Dbar0 --> K0S pi+ pi- Dalitz plot from LIBBY 2010 is used as input.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
We combined the systematics in quadrature. The authors report separately the contribution to the systematic uncertainty   due to the uncertainty on the bin-averaged strong phase difference between D0 and Dbar0   amplitudes. Superseded by ABUDINEN 2022.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi-, K0S K+ K- decays from B+ --> D^(*)() K+, D K^*()+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval for gamma is 39degree<gamma< 98degree. CP conservation in the combined result is ruled out with a significance of 3.5 standard deviations.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Reports confidence intervals for the CKM angle gamma from the measured values of the GLW parameters using B()+- --> D K()+- decays with D mesons decaying to non-CP(K pi),  CP-even (K+ K-, pi+ pi-), and CP-odd (K0S pi0, K0S omega) states.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- decays from B+ --> D^(*)() K+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval for gamma is 54.2degree<gamma< 100.5degree. CP conservation in the combined result is ruled out with a significance of 3.5 standard deviations.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of D0 --> K0S pi+ pi- decays coming from B0 --> D0 K^*()0 modes. The corresponding 95% CL interval is 77degrees<gamma< 247degrees.  A 180 degree ambiguity is implied.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- and Dbar^0() --> K0S K+ K- decays coming from B()+- --> D^(*)() K^(*)()+- modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 29degree<gamma< 122degree.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of the Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- decays; Combines the D K+, D^* K+ and D K^*+() modes. The corresponding two standard deviations interval for gamma is 8degree<gamma< 111degree.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of neutral D --> K0S pi+ pi- decays coming from B+- --> D K+- and B+- --> D^*()0 K+- followed by D^*()0 --> D pi0, D gamma. The corresponding two standard deviations interval for gamma is 12degree < gamma < 137degree. AUBERT,B 2005Y also reports the amplitude ratios and the strong phases.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of the 3-body D --> KS pi+ pi- decays coming from B+- --> D K+- and B+- --> D^* K+- followed by D^* --> D pi0; here we use D to denote that the neutral D meson produced in the decay is an admixture of D0 and Dbar0. The corresponding two standard deviations interval for gamma is 26**degrees <gamma< 126**degrees. POLUEKTOV 2004 also reports the amplitude ratios and the strong phases.


pdgid: S041ARX
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of B+ --> D K+ decays, with D --> K0S pi+ pi- and D --> K0S K+ K-.   Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c (LIBBY 2010) of the D decay over the Dalitz plot   are used as input. Supersedes AIHARA 2012.


pdgid: S041ARX
text:
Uses binned analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- pi0 from B+- --> D K+- modes over the phase   space. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c and BES-III data of the D decay over the phase  space binning are used as input.


pdgid: S041ARX
text:
Uses binned analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- pi0 from B+- --> D K+- modes over the phase  space. Strong phase measurements from RESMI 2018 analysis of CLEO-c data of the D decay  over the phase space binning are used as input.


pdgid: S041ARX
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi-, K0S K+ K- decays from B+ --> D^(*)() K^(*)()+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 0.037 <r_{{B}}<0.155.


pdgid: S041ARX
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- decays from B+ --> D^0() K+ modes.  The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 0.084 <r_{{B}}< 0.239.


pdgid: S041ARX
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- and Dbar^0() --> K0S K+ K- decays coming from B()+- --> D^(*)() K^(*)()+- modes.


pdgid: S041ARX
text:
Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of the Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- decays; Combines the D K+, D^* K+ and D K^*+() modes.


pdgid: S041ARX
text:
Uses a Dalitz analysis of neutral D decays to K0S pi+ pi- in the processes B+- --> D^(*)() K+-, D^*() --> D pi0, D gamma.


pdgid: S041DRX
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of B+ --> D K+ decays, with D --> K0S pi+ pi- and D --> K0S K+ K-.  Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c (LIBBY 2010) of the  D decay over the Dalitz plot  are used as input.


pdgid: S041DRX
text:
AAIJ 2014BE uses model-dependent analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- amplitudes. The model is  the same as in DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010F.


pdgid: S041DRX
text:
We combined the systematics in quadrature. The authors report separately the contribution to the systematic uncertainty  due to the uncertainty on the bin-averaged strong phase difference between D0 and Dbar0  amplitudes. Superseded by ABUDINEN 2022.


pdgid: S041DRX
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi-, K0S K+ K- decays from B+ --> D^(*)() K^(*)()+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 75degree<delta_{{B}}<157degree.


pdgid: S041DRX
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- decays from B+ --> Dbar^0() K+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 102.2degree<delta_{{B}}< 162.3degree.


pdgid: S041A32
text:
Measured using B+- --> D [ K-+ pi+- pi+- pi-+ ] h+- decays in bins of the   phase  space  of the D decay. The third uncertainty includes systematic and finite knowledge of   the  D-meson decay parameters.


pdgid: S041A32
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- and K0S K+ K- from B+- --> D pi+-   modes. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c and BES-III of the D decay over the Dalitz plot  are used as input.


pdgid: S041A33
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- and K0S K+ K- from B+- --> D pi+-   modes. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c and BES-III of the D decay over the Dalitz plot   are used as input. Value is modulo 180degree.


pdgid: S041ARY
text:
Extracted from yields of partially reconstructed B+- --> D^* K+-, D^* --> D pi0 / gamma , D --> K0S pi+ pi- / K0S K+ K- decays. The uncertainty is predominantly statistical. Its correlation with the AAIJ 2023BA  result is found to be less than 3%.


pdgid: S041ARY
text:
Measured using B+- --> D^* K+- decays analysing the signal yield variation with the fully  reconstructed D^* --> D pi0 / gamma , D --> K0S pi+ pi- / K0S K+ K- decays. The model-independent approach uses external strong phase input from BESIII and CLEO collaborations.


pdgid: S041ARY
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi-, K0S K+ K- decays from B+ --> D^(*)() K^(*)()+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 0.049 <r^*_B()<0.215.


pdgid: S041ARY
text:
Uses the Cabibbo suppressed decay of B+ --> Dbar^*() K+ followed by Dbar^*() --> Dbar pi0 or Dbar gamma, and Dbar --> K- pi+.


pdgid: S041ARY
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- decays from B+ --> D^*()0 K+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 0.061 <r^*_B()< 0.271.


pdgid: S041DRY
text:
Measured using B+- --> D^* K+- decays analysing the signal yield variation with the fully  reconstructed D^* --> D pi0 / gamma , D --> K0S pi+ pi- / K0S K+ K- decays. The  model-independent approach uses external strong phase input from BESIII and CLEO collaborations.


pdgid: S041DRY
text:
Reports combination of published measurements using GGSZ, GLW, and ADS methods. We added 360degrees to the value of (-66+21-31)degrees quoted by LEES 2013B.


pdgid: S041DRY
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi-, K0S K+ K- decays from B+ --> D^(*)() K^(*)()+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 236degree<delta_{{B}}^*()<322degree.


pdgid: S041DRY
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- decays from B+ --> D^* K+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 296.5degree<delta_{{B}}^*()< 382.7degree.


pdgid: S041D18
text:
Measured using B+- --> D^* pi+- decays analysing the signal yield variation with the fully  reconstructed D^* --> D pi0 / gamma , D --> K0S pi+ pi- / K0S K+ K- decays. The  model-independent approach uses external strong phase input from BESIII and CLEO collaborations.


pdgid: S041PBO
text:
Uses B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)+) = 1.431+-0.027+-0.090E-3 for normalization and mu+ mu- as a lepton pair.


pdgid: S041PB7
text:
Uses B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)+) = 1.431+-0.027+-0.090E-3 for normalization and mu+ mu- as a lepton pair. Measured in 1.1 < q**2 < 6.0 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S041A54
text:
The reported value is converted from the measured dB/dq^2 = 9.2+1.9-1.8+0.8-0.6E-8   (GeV**2/c**4)**-1 by multiplying by the Deltaq^2 = 5.955   GeV**2/c**4  range.


pdgid: S041PBN
text:
Uses B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 0.998+-0.014+-0.040E-3 for normalization and mu+ mu- as a lepton pair.


pdgid: S041PBF
text:
Measured by taking the ratio of the branching fraction from B+ --> K+ e+ e- and B+ --> J/psi ( e+ e- ) K+  decays and multiplying it by the measured value of B+ --> J/psi K+ and J/psi --> e+ e- as  in PDG 2018. The branching fraction of B+ --> K+ e+ e- is determined in the region 1.1  < q**2 < 6 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S041PBF
text:
Uses B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 0.998+-0.014+-0.040E-3 for normalization and mu+ mu- for leptons. Measured for 1.1 < q**2< 6.0 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S041PBF
text:
Measured by taking the ratio of the branching fraction from B+ --> K+ e+ e- and B+ --> J/psi ( e+ e- ) K+decays  and multiplying it by the measured value of B+ -->J/psi K+ and J/psi --> e+ e- as in  PDG 2012.The branching fraction of B+ --> K+ e+ e- is determined in the region 1 <  q**2 < 6 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S041PBP
text:
The ratio is determined using the relative branching fractions of the decays B+ --> K+ lepton+ lepton-  and B+ --> J/psi(lepton+ lepton-) K+, with lepton = e, mu. Measured for  the region 1.1 < q**2 < 6.0 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S041PBJ
text:
Measurement is performed in 1.0 < q**2 < 6.0 GeV**2/c**4. SIRUNYAN 2018DX  reports also measurements in several other q**2 intervals.


pdgid: S041PBJ
text:
AAIJ 2014O reports 68% C.L. interval, which we encode as midpoint with uncertainty as half of the width of interval.


pdgid: S041A51
text:
The full set of CP-averaged angular observables is measured as a function of the q**2. The  A(FB) is measured related to the dimuon system.


pdgid: S041A03
text:
AAIJ 2017AP uses B+ --> Dbar0 pi+ decays with B+ transverse momenta pT and  rapidities y in the region of 2 < pT < 30 GeV/c and 2.1 < y < 4.5.


pdgid: S041A03
text:
AAIJ 2017BF uses B+ --> J/psi K+ decays with B+ transverse momenta pT and  rapidities y in the region of 0 < pT < 30 GeV/c and 2.1 < y < 4.5.


pdgid: S042M
text:
CSORNA 2000 uses fully reconstructed 135 B0 --> J/psi^(') K0S events and invariant masses without beam constraint.


pdgid: S042M
text:
Found using fully reconstructed decays with J/psi.  ALBRECHT 1987D assume mass(Upsilon(4S)) = 10577 MeV.


pdgid: S042DM
text:
BEBEK 1987 actually measure the difference between half of Ecm and the B+- or B0 mass, so the mass(B0)-mass(B+-) is more accurate. Assume mass(Upsilon(4S)) = 10580 MeV.


pdgid: S042T
text:
Measured using a simultaneous fit of the B0 lifetime and Bbar0 B0 oscillation frequency Deltamass(d) in the partially reconstructed B0 --> D^*()- lepton nu decays.


pdgid: S042T
text:
AUBERT 2003C uses a sample of approximately 14,000 exclusively reconstructed B0 --> D^*(2010)- lepton nu and simultaneously measures the lifetime and oscillation frequency.


pdgid: S042T
text:
Measurement performed with decays B0 --> D^*()- pi+ and B0 --> D^*()- rho+ using a partial reconstruction technique.


pdgid: S042T
text:
Combined result of D/D^* lepton x analysis, fully reconstructed B analysis, and partially reconstructed D^*()- pi+ X analysis.


pdgid: S042T
text:
WAGNER 1990 tagged B0 mesons by their decays into D^*()- e+ nu and D^*()- mu+ nu where the D^*()- is tagged by its decay into pi- Dbar0.


pdgid: S042DT2
text:
ARTUSO 1997 uses partial reconstruction of B --> D^* lepton nu_lepton and independent of B0 and B+ production fraction.


pdgid: S042DT2
text:
ATHANAS 1994 uses events tagged by fully reconstructed B- decays and partially or fully reconstructed B0 decays.


pdgid: S042DGS
text:
Measured using B0 --> J/psi K^*(892)0 and B0 --> J/psi K0S decays, and assuming  beta = 21.9+-0.7 degrees.


pdgid: S042DGS
text:
Measured from the ratio of decay time distributions of B0 --> J/psi K0S and B0 --> J/psi K^*()0  decays.


pdgid: S042DGS
text:
Reports -DeltaGamma_{{d}}/Gamma_{{d}} using B0 --> J/psi K0S, J/psi K0L, D- pi+, D^*()- pi+, D^*()- rho+, and D^*()- lepton+ nu decays.


pdgid: S042DGS
text:
BEHRENS 2000B uses high-momentum lepton tags and partially reconstructed Bbar0 --> D^*()+ pi-, rho- decays to determine the flavor of the Bmeson. Assumes Delta(md)=0.478+-0.018ps**-1 and tau(B0)=1.548+-0.032ps.


pdgid: S042R94
text:
URQUIJO 2007 report a measurement of (9.80+-0.29+-0.21)% for the partial branching fraction of B --> e nu_e X_c decay with electron energy above 0.6 GeV. We converted the result to B --> e nu_e X branching fraction.


pdgid: S042P68
text:
The correlation of 50% with B(B+ --> lepton+ nu_lepton X_u)(letpon energy in B rest  frame E(lepton)*** > 1 GeV) was reported.


pdgid: S042R35
text:
Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side while the other, on the signal side, is partially reconstructed from B --> D lepton nu.


pdgid: S042R35
text:
BUSKULIC 1997 assumes fraction (B+) = fraction (B0) = (37.8+-2.2)% and PDG 1996 values for Blifetime and branching ratio of D^* and D decays.


pdgid: S042R35
text:
FULTON 1991 assumes assuming  equal production of B0 and B+ at the Upsilon(4S)  and uses MarkIII D and D^* branching ratios.


pdgid: S042R35
text:
ALBRECHT 1989J reports 0.018+-0.006+-0.005. We rescale using the method described in STONE 1994 but with the updated PDG 1994 B(D0 --> K- pi+).


pdgid: S042R21
text:
Measured using fully reconstructed D^*() sample and a simultaneous fit to the Caprini-Lellouch-Neubert  form factor parameters: rho**2 = 1.191+-0.048+-0.028,  R(1)(1) = 1.429+-0.061+-0.044, and R(2)(1) = 0.827+-0.038+-0.022.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
ABBIENDI 2000Q assumes the fraction B(b --> B0)= (39.7+1.8-2.2)%.  This result is an average of two methods using exclusive and partial D^* reconstruction.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
BUSKULIC 1997 assumes fraction (B+) = fraction (B0) = (37.8+-2.2)% and PDG 1996 values for Blifetime and D^* and D branching fractions.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1997G assumes fraction (B+) = fraction (B0) = (37.8+-2.2)% and PDG 1996 values for Blifetime and branching ratio of D^* and D decays.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
BARISH 1995 use B(D0 --> K- pi+) = (3.91+-0.08+-0.17)% and B(D^*()+ --> D0 pi+) = (68.1+-1.0+-1.3)%.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
BUSKULIC 1995N assumes fraction (B+) = fraction (B0) = 38.2+-1.3+-2.2% and meanlife(B0) = 1.58+-0.06ps. Gamma(D^*()- lepton+ nu_lepton)/total = [5.18-0.13(fraction(B0)-38.2)-1.5(meanlife(B0)-1.58)]%.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
ALBRECHT 1994 assumes B(D^*()+ --> D0 pi+) = 68.1+-1.0+-1.3%. Uses partial reconstruction of D^*()+ and is independent of D0 branching ratios.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
The measurement of ALBRECHT 1989C suggests a D^* polarization gamma_{{L}}/gamma_{{T}} of 0.85+-0.45. or alpha = 0.7+-0.9.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
ALBRECHT 1989J is ALBRECHT 1987J value rescaled using B(D^*(2010)- --> D0 pi-) = 0.57+-0.04+-0.04. Superseded by ALBRECHT 1993.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
We have taken average of the the BORTOLETTO 1989B values for electrons and muons, 0.046+-0.005+-0.007. We rescale using the method described in STONE 1994 but with the updated PDG 1994 B(D0 --> K- pi+). The measurement suggests a D^* polarization parameter value alpha = 0.65+-0.66+-0.25.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
ALBRECHT 1987J assume mu-e universality, the B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 0.45, the B(D0 --> K- pi+) = (0.042+-0.004+-0.004), and the B(D^*(2010)- --> D0 pi-) = 0.49+-0.08. Superseded by ALBRECHT 1989J.


pdgid: S042Q36
text:
LIVENTSEV 2008   reports 4.2+-0.7+-0.6E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Dbar0 pi- lepton+ nu_lepton)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton)] assuming B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.12+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.10+-0.07E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042Q36
text:
LIVENTSEV 2005   reports [G(B0 --> Dbar0 pi- lepton+ nu_lepton)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 lepton+ nu_lepton)] = 0.15+-0.03+-0.03 which we multiply by our best value B(B+ --> Dbar0 lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.26+-0.07E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S04
text:
Uses a simultaneous fit of all B semileptonic decays without full reconstruction of events. AUBERT 2009Y reports B(B0 --> Dbar_2^*(2460)- lepton+ nu_lepton) . B(Dbar_2^*(2460)- --> Dbar^(*)()0 pi-) =  1.77+-0.26+-0.11E-3 and the authors have provided us the individual measurement.


pdgid: S042Q37
text:
LIVENTSEV 2008   reports 5.6+-2.1+-0.8E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Dbar^*()0 pi- lepton+ nu_lepton)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton)] assuming B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.12+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.10+-0.07E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042Q37
text:
LIVENTSEV 2005   reports [G(B0 --> Dbar^*()0 pi- lepton+ nu_lepton)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 lepton+ nu_lepton)] = 0.10+-0.02+-0.01 which we multiply by our best value B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 lepton+ nu_lepton) = 5.26+-0.10E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R95
text:
Averaging with ALEXANDER 1996T results including experimental and theoretical correlations considered, BEHRENS 2000 reports systematic errors (-0.46)**+0.33+-0.41, where the second error is theoretical model dependence.  We combine these in quadrature.


pdgid: S042R95
text:
ATHAR 2003 reports systematic errors +0.47, which are experimental systematic, systematic due to residual form-factor uncertainties in the signal, and systematic due to residual form-factor uncertainties in the cross-feed modes, respectively. We combine these in quadrature.


pdgid: S042R95
text:
Uses isospin constraints and extrapolation to all electron energies according to five different form-factor calculations. The second error combines the systematic and theoretical uncertainties in quadrature.


pdgid: S042R95
text:
BEHRENS 2000 reports +0.35, where the second error is the theoretical model dependence.  We combine these in quadrature. B+ and B0 decays combined using isospin symmetry: Gamma(B0 --> rho- lepton+ nu)=2Gamma(B+ --> rho0 lepton+ nu)~~ 2Gamma(B+ --> omega lepton+ nu).  No evidence for omega lepton nu is reported.


pdgid: S042R95
text:
ALEXANDER 1996T reports +0.5 where the second error is the theoretical model dependence.  We combine these in quadrature. B+ and B0 decays combined using isospin symmetry: Gamma(B0 --> rho- lepton+ nu) =2Gamma(B+ --> rho0 lepton+ nu) ~~ 2Gamma(B+ --> omega lepton+ nu). No evidence for omega lepton nu is reported.


pdgid: S042R95
text:
BEAN 1993B limit set using ISGW Model.  Using isospin and the quark model to combine Gamma(rho0 lepton+ nu_lepton) and Gamma(omega lepton+ nu_lepton) with this result, they obtain a limit <(1.6 -- 2.7)*10**-4 at 90% CL for B+ --> (omega  or  rho0) lepton+ nu_lepton. The range corresponds to the ISGW, WSB, and KS models.  An upper limit on |V(ub)/V(cb)| <0.08 -- 0.13 at 90% CL is derived as well.


pdgid: S042S48
text:
Reports also a branching fraction value B(B0 --> pi- lepton+ nu) = 1.45+-0.04+-0.06E-4 from the decays of B+ and B0 that are combined using the isospin symmetry relation.


pdgid: S042S48
text:
Uses loose neutrino reconstruction technique. Assumes B(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-) = (51.6+-0.6)% and B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = (48.4+-0.6)%.


pdgid: S042S48
text:
Also report the rate for q**2> 16 GeV**2 of 0.41+-0.08+-0.04E-4 from which they obtain |V_(ub)| = 3.6+-0.4+-0.2+0.6-0.4 (last error is from theory).


pdgid: S042S48
text:
The analysis uses events in which the signal B decays are reconstructed with an innovative loose neutrino reconstruction technique.


pdgid: S042S48
text:
The signals are tagged by a second B meson reconstructed in a semileptonic or hadronic decay. The B0 and B+ results are combined assuming the isospin symmetry.


pdgid: S042S48
text:
ATHAR 2003 reports systematic errors 0.11+-0.01+-0.07, which are experimental systematic, systematic due to residual form-factor uncertainties in the signal, and systematic due to residual form-factor uncertainties in the cross-feed modes, respectively. We combine these in quadrature.


pdgid: S042S48
text:
ALEXANDER 1996T gives systematic errors +-0.3+-0.2 where the second error reflects the estimated model dependence.  We combine these in quadrature. Assumes isospin symmetry: Gamma(B0 --> pi- lepton+ nu) = 2xGamma(B+ --> pi0 lepton+ nu).


pdgid: S042R30
text:
ALBRECHT 1988K assumes B0 Bbar0:B+ B- production ratio is 45:55. Superseded by ALBRECHT 1990J which assumes 50:50.


pdgid: S042R30
text:
AUBERT,B 2004O  reports [G(B0 --> D- pi+)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K0S pi+)] = 42.7+-2.1+-2.2E-6 which we divide by our best value B(D+ --> K0S pi+) = 1.561+-0.031E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R30
text:
ALAM 1994   reports [G(B0 --> D- pi+)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] = 0.265+-0.032+-0.023E-3 which we divide by our best value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.38+-0.16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R33
text:
ALAM 1994   reports [G(B0 --> D- rho+)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] = 0.000704+-0.000096+-0.000070 which we divide by our best value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.38+-0.16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R1
text:
The second uncertainty combines in quadrature all systematic uncertainties quoted in the paper. AAIJ 2015Y reports B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-) = 8.46+-0.14+-0.49E-4 in the kinematic region m(Dbar0 pi+-) > 2.1 GeV which we corrected to the full phase-space dividing by 0.945 from Belle.


pdgid: S042R1
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses MarkIII branching fractions for the D. The product branching fraction into D_0^*(2340) pi followed by D_0^*(2340) --> D0 pi is <0.0001 at 90% CL and into D_{{2}}^*(2460) followed by D_2^*(2460) --> D0 pi is <0.0004 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S042R1
text:
BEBEK 1987 assume the Upsilon(4S) decays 43% to B0 Bbar0. We rescale to 50%. B(D0 --> K- pi+) = (4.2+-0.4+-0.4)% and B(D0 --> K- pi+ pi+ pi-) = (9.1+-0.8+-0.8)% were used.


pdgid: S042R1
text:
Corrected by us using assumptions: B(D0 --> K- pi+) = (0.042+-0.006) and B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 50%. The product branching ratio is B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-)B(Dbar0 --> K+ pi-) = 0.39+-0.26E-2.


pdgid: S042R2
text:
KROHN 2023   reports 2.623+-0.016+-0.086E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0)] assuming B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 0.486+-0.006.


pdgid: S042R2
text:
AUBERT,BE 2006J  reports [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- pi+)] = 0.99+-0.11+-0.08 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.51+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R2
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 4.0+-1.0+-0.7E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R2
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J  reports 2.8+-0.9+-0.6E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R2
text:
BEBEK 1987   reports 2.8+1.5-1.2+1.0-0.6E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R2
text:
Assumes B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.60+0.08-0.15. Assumes B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 0.40+-0.02  Does not depend on D branching ratios.


pdgid: S042R19
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J  reports 0.018+-0.004+-0.005 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R3
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 0.019+-0.008+-0.011 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- rho+)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R3
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J  reports 0.007+-0.003+-0.003 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- rho+)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R3
text:
MATVIENKO 2015 reports B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- rho+ , rho+ --> omega pi+) = 1.48+-0.27+0.15-0.09+0.21-0.56E-3.  The last uncertainty is a model one.


pdgid: S042R3
text:
This decay is nearly completely longitudinally polarized, Gamma(L)/Gamma = (93+-5+-5)%, as expected from the factorization hypothesis (ROSNER 1990).  The nonresonant pi+ pi0 contribution under the rho+ is less than 9% at 90% CL.


pdgid: S042R3
text:
Uses B(D^* --> D0 pi+) = 0.6+-0.15 and B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 0.4. Does not depend on D branching ratios.


pdgid: S042B5
text:
KROHN 2023   reports 2.221+-0.063+-0.077E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- K+)/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0)] assuming B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 0.486+-0.006.


pdgid: S042B5
text:
AUBERT 2006A  reports [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- K+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+)] = 0.0776+-0.0034+-0.0029 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+) = 2.66+-0.07E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B5
text:
ABE 2001I  reports [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- K+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+)] = 0.074+-0.015+-0.006 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+) = 2.66+-0.07E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R20
text:
The three pion mass is required to be between 1.0 and 1.6 GeV consistent with an a_{{1}} meson. (If this channel is dominated by a_{{1}}()+, the branching ratio for Dbar^*()- a_1()+ is twice that for Dbar^*()- pi+ pi+ pi-.)


pdgid: S042R20
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 0.0159+-0.0028+-0.0037 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R20
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J  reports 0.012+-0.003+-0.004 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R90
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses MarkIII branching fractions for the D and D^*(2010).


pdgid: S042R92
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 0.0068+-0.0032+-0.0021 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+ rho0)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R87
text:
ALAM 1994 value is twice their Gamma(D^*(2010)- pi+ pi+ pi-)/Gamma(total) value based on their observation that the three pions are dominantly in the a_{{1}}(1260) mass range 1.0 to 1.6 GeV.


pdgid: S042R87
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 0.018+-0.006+-0.006 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- a_1(1260)+)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R65
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J  reports 0.041+-0.015+-0.016 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+ pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B7
text:
The signal is consistent with all observed omega pi+ having proceeded through the rho^'+ resonance at mass 1349+-25+10-5 MeV and width 547+-86+46-45 MeV.


pdgid: S042B75
text:
The measurement is obtained by amplitude analysis of B0 --> D^*()- omega pi+. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature experimental systematic and model uncertainties.


pdgid: S042B75
text:
Obtained by fitting the events with cos( theta(D^*()) ) < 0.5 and scaling up the result by a factor of 4/3. No interference effects between B0 --> D_1^'() omega and D^* omega pi are assumed.


pdgid: S042C45
text:
Obtained by amplitude analysis of Bbar0 --> D^*()- omega pi+. The second uncertainty combines in  qudrature experimental systematic and model uncertainties.


pdgid: S042R77
text:
AUBERT,BE 2006J  reports [G(B0 --> Dbar^**()- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- pi+)] = 0.77+-0.22+-0.29 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.51+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S22
text:
Result obtained using the isobar formalism. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature all systematic uncertainties quoted in the paper.


pdgid: S042R48
text:
ZUPANC 2007   reports 7.5+-0.2+-1.1E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.4+-0.6E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R48
text:
AUBERT 2006N  reports 0.64+-0.13+-0.10E-2 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.0462+-0.0062, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R48
text:
GIBAUT 1996   reports 0.0087+-0.0024+-0.0020 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R48
text:
ALBRECHT 1992G  reports 0.017+-0.013+-0.006 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R48
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 0.0080+-0.0045+-0.0030 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.030+-0.011, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R47
text:
AUBERT 2006N  reports 0.71+-0.13+-0.09E-2 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.0462+-0.0062, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R47
text:
AUBERT 2003I  reports 0.0103+-0.0014+-0.0013 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R47
text:
AHMED 2000B  reports 0.0110+-0.0018+-0.0011 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R47
text:
Assumes PDG 1990 D+ and D^*(2010)+ branching ratios, e.g., B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.71+-0.25%, B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 7.1+-1.0%, and B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 55+-4%.


pdgid: S042R47
text:
ALBRECHT 1992G  reports 0.014+-0.010+-0.003 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R47
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 0.016+-0.009+-0.006 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.030+-0.011, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R47
text:
GIBAUT 1996   reports 0.0093+-0.0023+-0.0016 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R98
text:
AUBERT 2006N  reports 0.69+-0.16+-0.09E-2 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.0462+-0.0062, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R98
text:
GIBAUT 1996   reports 0.0100+-0.0035+-0.0022 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R98
text:
ALBRECHT 1992G  reports 0.027+-0.017+-0.009 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R00
text:
AUBERT 2006N  reports 1.68+-0.21+-0.19E-2 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.0462+-0.0062, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R00
text:
A partial reconstruction technique is used and the result is independent of the particle decay rate of D_{{S}}()+ meson. It also provides a model-independent determination of B(D_S()+ --> phi pi+) = (4.81+-0.52+-0.38)%.


pdgid: S042R00
text:
AUBERT 2003I  reports 0.0197+-0.0015+-0.0030 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R00
text:
AHMED 2000B  reports 0.0182+-0.0037+-0.0025 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R00
text:
ALBRECHT 1992G  reports 0.026+-0.014+-0.006 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R00
text:
GIBAUT 1996   reports 0.0203+-0.0050+-0.0036 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P66
text:
AAIJ 2021S  reports [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)] * [B(D_s^*()+ --> D_s()+ gamma)] = 2.045+-0.022+-0.071 which we divide by our best value B(D_s^*()+ --> D_s()+ gamma) = 93.6+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R64
text:
AUBERT 2003I  reports 3.00+-0.19+-0.39E-2 from a measurement of [[G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)+ G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R64
text:
BORTOLETTO 1990   reports 7.5+-2.0E-2 from a measurement of [[G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)+ G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.02, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042Q55
text:
DRUTSKOY 2005   reports 5.3+1.5-1.3+-1.6E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s0(2317)- K+  ,  D_s0()- --> D_s()- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B57
text:
CHOI 2015A  reports 10.2+1.3-1.2+-1.0+-0.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s0^*(2317)+ D-  ,  D_s0^*()+ --> D_s()+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.39+-0.21E-2,B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.13+-0.19E-2, which we rescale to our best values B(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.45+-0.08E-2, B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.38+-0.16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S042B57
text:
AUBERT,B 2004S  reports 1.8+-0.4+0.7-0.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s0^*(2317)+ D-  ,  D_s0^*()+ --> D_s()+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B57
text:
KROKOVNY 2003B  reports 0.86+0.33-0.26+-0.26E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s0^*(2317)+ D-  ,  D_s0^*()+ --> D_s()+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B58
text:
AUBERT,B 2004S  reports [G(B0 --> D_sJ(2457)+ D-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0)] = 2.3+1.0-0.7+-0.3E-3 which we divide by our best value B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0) = 48+-11E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B58
text:
KROKOVNY 2003B  reports [G(B0 --> D_sJ(2457)+ D-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0)] = 1.9+0.7-0.6+-0.2E-3 which we divide by our best value B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0) = 48+-11E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042Q10
text:
AUBERT,B 2004S  reports 0.8+-0.2+0.3-0.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_sJ(2457)+ D()-  ,  D_sJ()+ --> D_s()+ gamma)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042Q10
text:
KROKOVNY 2003B  reports 0.82+0.22-0.19+-0.25E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_sJ(2457)+ D()-  ,  D_sJ()+ --> D_s()+ gamma)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042Q09
text:
AUBERT,B 2004S  reports [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_sJ(2457)+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0)] = 5.5+-1.2+2.2-1.6E-3 which we divide by our best value B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0) = 48+-11E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C05
text:
Derived using tan(theta_{{C}}) f_{{D}}/f(D_{{s}}()) sqrt( B(B0 --> D_s()+ pi-) / B(B0 --> D- pi+) ) by assuming the flavor SU(3) symmetry, where theta_{{C}} is the Cabibbo angle, f_{{D}} (f(D_{{s}}())) is the D (D_{{s}}()) meson decay constant.


pdgid: S042C05
text:
DAS 2010   reports [G(B0 --> D+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- pi+)] = 2.92+-0.38+-0.31E-4 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.51+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R49
text:
AUBERT 2007K  reports [G(B0 --> D_s()+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.63+-0.15+-0.05E-6 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R49
text:
AUBERT 2003D  reports [G(B0 --> D_s()+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 1.13+-0.33+-0.21E-6 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R49
text:
KROKOVNY 2002   reports [G(B0 --> D_s()+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.86+0.37-0.30+-0.11E-6 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R49
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <270E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S4
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <1.7E-3 from a measurement of [[G(B0 --> D_s()+ pi-)/G(total)+ G(B0 --> D_s()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S17
text:
AUBERT 2007K  reports [G(B0 --> D_s^*()+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 1.32+-0.27+-0.15E-6 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S17
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <44E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S6
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <1.2E-3 from a measurement of [[G(B0 --> D_s^*()+ pi-)/G(total)+ G(B0 --> D_s^*()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S7
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <2.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()+ rho-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S7
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <6.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()+ rho-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S8
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <2.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()+ rho-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S8
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <7.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()+ rho-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S9
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <3.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()+ a_1(1260)-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S10
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <2.9E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()+ a_1(1260)-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042R50
text:
AUBERT 2007K  reports [G(B0 --> D_s()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 1.21+-0.17+-0.11E-6 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R50
text:
AUBERT 2003D  reports [G(B0 --> D_s()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 1.16+-0.36+-0.24E-6 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R50
text:
KROKOVNY 2002   reports [G(B0 --> D_s()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 1.61+0.45-0.38+-0.21E-6 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R50
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <230E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S18
text:
AUBERT 2007K  reports [G(B0 --> D_s^*()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.97+-0.24+-0.12E-6 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S18
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <17E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S11
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <4.6E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()- K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S11
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <9.7E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()- K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S12
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <5.8E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()- K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S12
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <11.0E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()- K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S13
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <7.3E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()- pi+ K0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S14
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <4.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()- pi+ K0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042C10
text:
AAIJ 2012AX reports [G(B0 --> D_s()- K+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B_s()0 --> D_s()- K+ pi+ pi-)] = 0.54+-0.07+-0.07 which we multiply by our best value B(B_s()0 --> D_s()- K+ pi+ pi-) = 3.2+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S15
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <5.0E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()- pi+ K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S16
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <2.7E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()- pi+ K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042B47
text:
Measured via amplitude analysis of B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-, which excludes contribution from decay via D^*(2010)- resonance.


pdgid: S042B47
text:
AAIJ 2015X  reports 5.13+-0.20+-0.15+-0.24+-0.60E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Dbar0 K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 9.2+-0.6+-0.7+-0.6E-5, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 8.8+-1.7E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C37
text:
Measured via amplitude analysis of B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-, which excludes contribution from decay  via D^*(2010)- resonance.


pdgid: S042C38
text:
AAIJ 2015X  reports 0.71+-0.27+-0.33+-0.47+-0.08E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Dbar0 K_0^*(1430)0)/G(total)] * [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 9.2+-0.6+-0.7+-0.6E-5, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 8.8+-1.7E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C39
text:
AAIJ 2015X  reports 2.04+-0.45+-0.30+-0.54+-0.25E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Dbar0 K_2^*(1430)0)/G(total)] * [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 9.2+-0.6+-0.7+-0.6E-5, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 8.8+-1.7E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C40
text:
AAIJ 2015X  reports 1.77+-0.26+-0.19+-0.67+-0.20E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_0^*(2300)- K+  ,  D_0^*()- --> Dbar0 pi-)/G(total)] * [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 9.2+-0.6+-0.7+-0.6E-5, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 8.8+-1.7E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042Q52
text:
AAIJ 2015X  reports 2.12+-0.10+-0.11+-0.11+-0.25E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_2^*(2460)- K+  ,  D_2^*()- --> Dbar0 pi-)/G(total)] * [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 9.2+-0.6+-0.7+-0.6E-5, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 8.8+-1.7E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S26
text:
NEMATI 1998 assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the PDG 1996 values for D0, D^*()0, eta, eta^', and omega branching fractions.


pdgid: S042R34
text:
Measured using isobar formalism in the decay chain B0 --> Dbar0 rho(770) , rho --> pi+ pi- assuming B(rho(770) --> pi+ pi-) = 1. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature all systematic uncertainties quoted in the paper.


pdgid: S042Q73
text:
Result obtained using the isobar formalism. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature all systematic uncertainties quoted in the paper. Measured in the decay chain B0 --> Dbar0 f_2(1270) , f_2() --> pi+ pi-.


pdgid: S042S29
text:
Result obtained using the isobar model. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature all systematic uncertainties quoted in the paper.


pdgid: S042P99
text:
The last uncertainty includes the uncertainties of the branching fractions B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-) and  B(phi --> K+ K-).


pdgid: S042B97
text:
Uses D0 --> K- pi+ mode. Restricts K+ pi- mass within +-50 MeV of the nominal K^*()0 mass. Corresponds to the upper limit, < 0.16 at 95% CL.


pdgid: S042B97
text:
Reports a signal at the level of 2.5 standard deviations after combining results from D0 --> K+ pi-, K+ pi- pi0, and K+ pi- pi+ pi-.


pdgid: S042S70
text:
The last uncertainty includes the uncertainties of the branching fraction B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-) and  B(phi --> K+ K-).


pdgid: S042S52
text:
BARATE 1998Q (ALEPH) observes 2 events with an expected background of 0.10+-0.03 which corresponds to a branching ratio of 2.3+1.9-1.2+-0.4E-3.


pdgid: S042S52
text:
ASNER 1997 at CLEO observes 1 event with an expected background of 0.022+-0.011.  This corresponds to a branching ratio of 5.3+7.1-3.7+-1.0E-4.


pdgid: S042S82
text:
The measurement is performed using a partial reconstruction technique for the D^* and fully reconstructed D+ decays as a cross check.


pdgid: S042S88
text:
CHILIKIN 2019   reports [G(B0 --> eta_c K0)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)] = 38.0+6.4-2.9+1.3-4.7E-7 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-) = 3.7+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S88
text:
AUBERT 2007AV reports [G(B0 --> eta_c K0)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)] = 0.83+0.28-0.26+-0.05E-6 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar) = 1.33+-0.11E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S88
text:
AUBERT,B 2004B  reports [G(B0 --> eta_c K0)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)] = 0.0648+-0.0085+-0.0071E-3 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi) = 7.1+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P28
text:
AAIJ 2018AN reports [G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K+ pi-)/G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K+ pi-)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 0.357+-0.015+-0.008 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar) = 1.33+-0.11E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S042P32
text:
AAIJ 2018AN reports [G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K^*(1410)0)/G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K+ pi-)] * [B(K^*(1410) --> K pi)] = 0.021+-0.011+-0.011 which we divide by our best value B(K^*(1410) --> K pi) = 6.6+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P34
text:
AAIJ 2018AN reports [G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K_0^*(1430)0)/G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K+ pi-)] * [B(K_0^*(1430) --> K pi)] = 0.253+-0.035+0.035-0.028 which we divide by our best value B(K_0^*(1430) --> K pi) = 93+-10E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P35
text:
AAIJ 2018AN reports [G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K_2^*(1430)0)/G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K+ pi-)] * [B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi)] = 0.041+-0.015+0.010-0.016 which we divide by our best value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = 49.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P36
text:
AAIJ 2018AN reports [G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K^*(1680)0)/G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K+ pi-)] * [B(K^*(1680) --> K pi)] = 0.022+-0.020+0.015-0.017 which we divide by our best value B(K^*(1680) --> K pi) = 38.7+-2.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P37
text:
AAIJ 2018AN reports [G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K_0^*(1950)0)/G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K+ pi-)] * [B(K_0^*(1950) --> K- pi+)] = 0.038+-0.018+0.014-0.025 which we divide by our best value B(K_0^*(1950) --> K- pi+) = 52+-14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B43
text:
AAIJ 2018AN reports B(B0 --> eta_c K^*(892)0 , K^*(892)0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.95+-0.16+0.36-0.44E-4 using  the fitted fraction of 0.514+-0.019+0.017-0.048 from Dalitz decay of B(B0 --> eta_c K+ pi-)=5.73+-0.24+-0.67E-4 and  corrected for B(K^*(892)0 --> K+ pi-) = 2/3.


pdgid: S042B43
text:
AUBERT 2008AB reports [G(B0 --> eta_c K^*(892)0)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> eta_c K+)] = 0.62+-0.06+-0.05 which we multiply by our best value B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 1.10+-0.07E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B43
text:
AUBERT 2007AV reports [G(B0 --> eta_c K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)] = 1.03+0.27-0.24+-0.17E-6 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar) = 1.33+-0.11E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R23
text:
CHILIKIN 2019   reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)] = 48.6+4.6-4.4+2.4-2.6E-7 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-) = 6.0+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R23
text:
AUBERT 2007AV reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 1.87+0.28-0.26+-0.07E-6 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R23
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 6+-3+-2E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R23
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J  reports 8+-6+-2E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R4
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 1.0+-0.4+-0.3E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R4
text:
ALBRECHT 1987D assume B+ B-/B0 Bbar0 ratio is 55/45. K pi system is specifically selected as nonresonant.


pdgid: S042R22
text:
AUBERT 2007AV reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 2.82+0.30-0.28+0.36-0.35E-6 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R22
text:
ABE 1998O reports [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)]/[B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] =1.76+-0.14+-0.15.  We multiply by our best value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)=9.9+-1.0E-4.  Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R22
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 1.1+-0.5+-0.3E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R22
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J  reports 1.1+-0.5+-0.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R22
text:
BEBEK 1987   reports 3.5+-1.6+-0.3E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R22
text:
The neutral and charged B events together are predominantly longitudinally polarized, Gamma(L)/Gamma =0.080+-0.08+-0.05. This can be compared with a prediction using HQET, 0.73 (KRAMER 1992).  This polarization indicates that the B --> psi K^* decay is dominated by the CP = -1 CP eigenstate.


pdgid: S042R22
text:
ALBRECHT 1994G measures the polarization in the vector-vector decay to be predominantly longitudinal, Gamma(T)/Gamma = 0.03+-0.16+-0.15 making the neutral decay a CP eigenstate when the K^*()0 decays through K0S pi0.


pdgid: S042R22
text:
ALAM 1986 assumes B+-/B0 ratio is 60/40. The observation of the decay B+ --> J/psi K^*(892)+ (HAAS 1985) has been retracted in this paper.


pdgid: S042B6
text:
Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses the PDG value of B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.00+-0.10E-3.


pdgid: S042S35
text:
AAIJ 2024N  reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi0)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)+)] = 1.153+-0.053+-0.048E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)+) = 1.43+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S51
text:
AAIJ 2015D  reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) eta)/G(total)] / [B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) eta)] = 1.85+-0.61+-0.14E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) eta) = 4.0+-0.7E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B45
text:
AAIJ 2013M does not report correlations between various measurements of the J/psi pi pi final state.


pdgid: S042B45
text:
AAIJ 2013M  reports 3.97+-0.09+-0.11+-0.16E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] assuming B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.018+-0.042E-3, which we rescale to our best value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C11
text:
AAIJ 2013M does not report correlations between various measurements of the J/psi pi pi final state. Measured in Dalitz plot like analysis of B0 --> J/psi pi+ pi-.


pdgid: S042C11
text:
AAIJ 2013M  reports 6.4+-0.8+2.4-0.8E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) f_0(500)  ,  f_0() --> pi pi)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.97+-0.09+-0.11+-0.16E-5, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.99+-0.15E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042Q75
text:
AAIJ 2013M  reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) f_2)/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] = 3.5+-0.4+-0.4E-6 from a measurement of [[G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) f_2)/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.97+-0.09+-0.11+-0.16E-5, which we rescale to our best values B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3+2.8-1.0E-2, B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.99+-0.15E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S042Q75
text:
AUBERT 2007AC reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) f_2)/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] < 0.46E-5 which we divide by our best value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3E-2.


pdgid: S042S46
text:
AAIJ 2014X uses Dalitz plot analysis of B0 --> J/psi pi+ pi-.  We assume B(rho(770)0 --> pi+ pi-) = 100%.


pdgid: S042S46
text:
AAIJ 2013M does not report correlations between various measurements of the J/psi pi pi final state. Measured in Dalitz plot like analysis of B0 --> J/psi pi+ pi-. Assumes B(rho(770)0 --> pi pi) = 100%.


pdgid: S042S46
text:
AAIJ 2013M  reports 2.49+0.20-0.13+0.16-0.23E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) rho()0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.97+-0.09+-0.11+-0.16E-5, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.99+-0.15E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C12
text:
AAIJ 2013M does not provide correlations between various measurements of the J/psi pi+ pi- final state. The measurements were obtained from a Dalitz plot like analysis of B0 --> J/psi pi+ pi-.  Also reports  = 6.1+3.1-2.0+1.7-1.4E-6.


pdgid: S042C13
text:
AAIJ 2013M  reports 2.1+1.0-0.6+2.2-0.4E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) rho(1450)0  ,  rho()0 --> pi pi)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.97+-0.09+-0.11+-0.16E-5, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.99+-0.15E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S47
text:
AAIJ 2014X  reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) omega)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-)] = 2.7+0.8-0.6+0.7-0.5E-7 which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-) = 1.53+-0.12E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C14
text:
AAIJ 2013M  reports 0.61+0.24-0.14+0.31-0.16 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) omega)/G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) rho()0)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-)] assuming B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-) = 1.53+0.11-0.13E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-) = 1.53+-0.12E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042BA1
text:
AAIJ 2013BT reports 2.53+-0.31+-0.19E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] assuming B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.018+-0.042E-3, which we rescale to our best value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042BA2
text:
AAIJ 2013BT uses B(Bbar0 --> J/psi K+ K-) = 2.53+-0.31+-0.19E-6 to derive this result. It also reports the equivalent upper limit of < 9.0E-7 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S042B53
text:
AAIJ 2013BT uses B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K+ K-) = 2.53+-0.31+-0.19E-6 and B(phi --> K+ K-) = (48.9+-0.5)% to obtain this result.


pdgid: S042B54
text:
AAIJ 2015D  reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) eta^'(958))/G(total)] / [B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) eta^')] = 2.28+-0.65+-0.16E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) eta^') = 3.3+-0.4E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C23
text:
Measured with B(B0 --> J/psi K0S K+ K-) / B(B0 --> J/psi K0S) using PDG 2012 for the involved branching fractions.


pdgid: S042RB3
text:
Measured with B(B0 --> J/psi K0S K+- pi-+) / B(B0 --> J/psi K0S pi+ pi-) using PDG 2012 values for the involved branching fractions.


pdgid: S042C22
text:
AAIJ 2014Y  reports 8.37+-1.95+0.71-0.66+-0.35E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) f_1(1285))/G(total)] * [B(f_1(1285) --> 2pi+ 2pi-)] assuming B(f_1(1285) --> 2pi+ 2pi-) = 0.11+0.007-0.006, which we rescale to our best value B(f_1(1285) --> 2pi+ 2pi-) = 10.9+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
HIRATA 2023   reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 1.34+0.47-0.40+0.10-0.12 which we multiply by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
CHOI 2011   reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 0.50+-0.14+-0.04 which we multiply by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010B  reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> omega J/psi(1S))] = 6+-3+-1E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> omega J/psi(1S)) = 5.0+-1.9E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
BHARDWAJ 2011   reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi)] < 2.4E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi) = 10E-3.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
AUSHEV 2010   reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0)] = 0.97+-0.46+-0.13E-4 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0) = 46+-16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
AUBERT 2009B  reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi)] < 4.9E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi) = 10E-3.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
AUBERT 2008B  reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0)] = 2.22+-1.05+-0.42E-4 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0) = 46+-16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
AUBERT 2008Y  reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] < 6.0E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3E-2.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
AUBERT 2006   reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] < 10.3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3E-2.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
GOKHROO 2006   reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> D0 Dbar0 pi0)] = 1.66+-0.70+0.32-0.37E-4 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> D0 Dbar0 pi0) = 55+-28E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
Measure the near-threshold enhancements in the (D0 Dbar^0() pi0) system at a mass 3875.2+-0.7+0.3-1.6+-0.8 MeV/c**2.


pdgid: S042P60
text:
BALA 2015   reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] = 4.0+-1.5+-0.3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P60
text:
AUBERT 2009B  reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi)] < 2.8E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi) = 10E-3.


pdgid: S042P60
text:
AUBERT 2009B reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma psi(2S))]  < 4.4E-6 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S042P61
text:
BALA 2015   reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] = 7.9+-1.3+-0.4E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P62
text:
CHOU 2019   reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) gamma)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] < 5.1E-7 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3E-2.


pdgid: S042B52
text:
Measured relative to B_s()0 --> J/psi phi assuming B( B_s()0 --> J/psi phi) = 10.5+-0.13+-0.64E-4 and  taking into account small  K+ K- S-wave contribution. Measurement assumes f(s)/f(d) =  0.259+-0.015 for 7, 8 TeV data and f(s)/f(d) multiplied by 1.068+-0.046 for 13  TeV data.


pdgid: S042Q04
text:
Branching fractions of normalization modes B0 --> J/psi gamma X taken from PDG 2014.  Uses f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.259+-0.015.


pdgid: S042R66
text:
Measured with B(B0 --> psi(2S) K0S) x B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) / B(B0  --> J/psi K0S) using PDG 2012 values for the involved branching fractions.


pdgid: S042QA1
text:
Assuming lepton universality for dimuon decay modes of J/psi and psi(2S) mesons, the ratio B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-)/B(psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = B(J/psi --> e+ e-)/B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.69+-0.19 was used.


pdgid: S042R68
text:
Combines measurements with psi(2S) --> lepton+ lepton- with measurement from MIZUK 2009 which uses psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-.


pdgid: S042R67
text:
ABE 1998O reports [B(B0 --> psi(2S) K^*(892)0)]/[B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] =0.908+-0.194+-0.10.  We multiply by our best value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)=9.9+-1.0E-4.  Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042T97
text:
AAIJ 2012L  reports 0.476+-0.014+-0.010+-0.012 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> psi(2S) K^*(892)0)/G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] / [B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.94+-0.06E-2,B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.72+-0.17E-3, which we rescale to our best values B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2, B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.94+-0.22E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S042S89
text:
AAIJ 2018F uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B0 --> K0S pi+ pi- final state decays. For  the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 2018 average B(B0 --> K0S pi+ pi-) =  4.96+-0.20E-5 is used. We compute B(B0 --> chi_c0() K0) using the PDG value  B(chi_c0() --> pi pi) = 8.51+-0.33E-3 and 2/3 for the pi+ pi- fraction. Our first  error is their experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best  value.


pdgid: S042S89
text:
LEES 2012I  reports [G(B0 --> chi_c0() K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> K0S K0S)] = 0.46+0.25-0.17+-0.21E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c0(1P) --> K0S K0S) = 3.18+-0.19E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S24
text:
CHILIKIN 2019   reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1 K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)] = 7.4+2.4-2.0+0.6-0.4E-7 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-) = 5.0+-1.9E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S24
text:
AVERY 2000   reports 3.9+1.9-1.3+-0.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> chi_c1 K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S24
text:
AUBERT 2002   reports 5.4+-1.4+-1.1E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> chi_c1 K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B3
text:
AUBERT 2002   reports 0.66+-0.11+-0.17 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> chi_c1 K0)/G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C16
text:
LEES 2012B  reports 0.474+-0.013+-0.026 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> chi_c1 pi- K+)/G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K+ pi-)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.4+-1.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S25
text:
AUBERT 2002   reports 4.8+-1.4+-0.9E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> chi_c1 K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B92
text:
Uses chi_c1() --> J/psi gamma mode. Uses chi_c1() --> J/psi gamma mode. Finds a good description of the data without this B0 --> X(4051)+ K- decay mode in a fit.


pdgid: S042B93
text:
Uses chi_c1() --> J/psi gamma mode. Finds a good description of the data without this B0 --> X(4248)+ K- decay mode in a fit.


pdgid: S042R10
text:
ADAM 1996D assumes f(B0) = f(B-) = 0.39 and f(B_{{s}}) = 0.12. Contributions from B0 and B_{{s}} decays cannot be separated.  Limits are given for the weighted average of the decay rates for the two neutral B mesons.


pdgid: S042R10
text:
Assumes a B0, B- production fraction of 0.39 and a B_{{s}} production fraction of 0.12. Contributions from B0 and B_{{s}}()0 decays cannot be separated.  Limits are given for the weighted average of the decay rates for the two neutral B mesons.


pdgid: S042S41
text:
This is the combined result of this analysis (ADACHI 2024) and the updated analysis of  ADACHI 2023E. The individual results are 10.40+-0.66+-0.60E-6 and 11.15+-0.68+-0.62E-6,  respectively.


pdgid: S042Q07
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B0 --> K+ pi- pi0 decays. The quoted value is only for the flat part of the non-resonant component.


pdgid: S042B00
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B0 --> K0S pi+ pi- final state decays. For the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 2018 average B(B0 --> K0S pi+ pi-) =  4.96+-0.20E-5 is used.


pdgid: S042P43
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B0 --> K0S pi+ pi- final state decays.  (Kpi)_{0}^*() is the S-wave component of K0 pi+. For the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 2018 average B(B0 --> K0S pi+ pi-) =  4.96+-0.20E-5 is used.


pdgid: S042B06
text:
GARMASH 2007 reports B(B0 --> f_2(1270) K0)xB(f_2(1270) --> pi+ pi-) <1.4E-6 using Dalitz plot analysis. We compute B(B0 --> f_2(1270) K0) using the PDG value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) =  and 2/3 for the pi+ pi- fraction.


pdgid: S042B06
text:
GARMASH 2007   reports [G(B0 --> f_2(1270) K0)/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] < 2.1E-6 which we divide by our best value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3E-2.


pdgid: S042R72
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B0 --> K0S pi+ pi- final state decays. We compute B(B0 --> K_2^*(1430)+ pi-) using  the PDG 2018 value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) =  and 2/3 for the  K0 pi+ fraction. For the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 2018 average  B(B0 --> K0S pi+ pi-) = 4.96+-0.20E-5 is used.


pdgid: S042R72
text:
GARMASH 2007 reports B(B0 --> K_2^*(1430)+ pi-)xB(K_2^*()+ --> K0 pi+) <2.1E-6 using Dalitz plot analysis. We compute B(B0 --> K_2^*(1430)+ pi-) using the PDG value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) =  and 2/3 for the K0 pi+ fraction.


pdgid: S042R72
text:
GARMASH 2007   reports [G(B0 --> K_2^*(1430)+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi)] < 3.15E-6 which we divide by our best value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = 49.9E-2.


pdgid: S042B03
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B0 --> K0S pi+ pi- final state decays. We compute B(B0 --> K_2^*(1430)+ pi-)  using the PDG 2018 value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = 49.9+-1.2E-2 and 2/3 for the  K0 pi+ fraction. For the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 2018 average  B(B0 --> K0S pi+ pi-) = 4.96+-0.20E-5 is used.


pdgid: S042B03
text:
GARMASH 2007 reports B(B0 --> K^*(1680)+ pi-)xB(K^*()+ --> K0 pi+) <2.6E-6 using Dalitz plot analysis. We compute B(B0 --> K^*(1680)+ pi-) using the PDG value B(K^*(1680) --> K pi)= and 2/3 for the K0 pi+ fraction.


pdgid: S042B03
text:
GARMASH 2007   reports [G(B0 --> K^*(1680)+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(K^*(1680) --> K pi)] < 3.9E-6 which we divide by our best value B(K^*(1680) --> K pi) = 38.7E-2.


pdgid: S042R15
text:
Assumes a helicity 00 configuration.  For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 2.4E-5.


pdgid: S042S1
text:
AAIJ 2012AR reports [G(B0 --> K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B_s()0 --> K+ K-)] / [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.018+0.008-0.007+-0.009 which we multiply by our best values B(B_s()0 --> K+ K-) = 2.72+-0.23E-5, [G(bbar --> B_s()0)G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.246+-0.023. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S042S1
text:
Obtains this result from B(K+ K-)/B(K+ pi-) = 0.020+-0.008+-0.006, assuming B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.4+-0.6E-6.


pdgid: S042S1
text:
ABULENCIA,A 2006D obtains this from Gamma(K+ K-)/Gamma(K+ pi-) < 0.10 at 90% CL, assuming B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 18.9+-0.7E-6.


pdgid: S042T74
text:
Measured in the range 0.7< mass(K pi)< 1.7 and corrected using PS assumption for the full K pi mass range.


pdgid: S042T30
text:
Measured in the range 0.7< mass(K pi)< 1.7 and corrected using PS assumption for the full K pi mass range.  The quoted result is equivalent to the upper limit of <13.9E-6 at 90%CL.


pdgid: S042S87
text:
AAIJ 2019L  reports [G(B0 --> K^*(892)0 Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] / [B(B_s()0 --> Kbar^*(892)0 K^*(892)0)] = 0.0758+-0.0057+-0.0030 which we multiply by our best value B(B_s()0 --> Kbar^*(892)0 K^*(892)0) = 1.11+-0.27E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S87
text:
Measured in the range 0.7< mass(K pi)< 1.7 and corrected using PS assumption for the full K pi mass range.  The quoted result is equivalent to the upper limit of <0.8E-6 at 90%CL.


pdgid: S042S87
text:
Assumes a helicity 00 configuration.  For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 1.9E-5.


pdgid: S042B9
text:
Assumes a helicity 00 configuration.  For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 2.9E-5.


pdgid: S042B10
text:
Assumes a helicity 00 configuration.  For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 8.9E-5.


pdgid: S042R76
text:
The angular distribution of B --> phi K^*(1430) provides evidence with statistical significance of 3.2~sigma.


pdgid: S042R16
text:
Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S). No evidence for a nonresonant K pi gamma contamination was seen; the central value assumes no contamination.


pdgid: S042R58
text:
PAL 2015 signal significance is 3.0 standard deviations. The measurement corresponds to  90% CL upper limit of < 6.5E-7.


pdgid: S042S76
text:
GUAN 2024   reports 1.53+-0.29+-0.17E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> omega omega)/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0)] assuming B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 48.4+-1.2E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 48.6+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R26
text:
Assumes a helicity 00 configuration.  For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 1.4E-5.


pdgid: S042R27
text:
DALSENO 2012 reports B(B0 --> a_1()+- pi-+) B(a_1()+- --> pi+- pi+ pi-) = 11.1+-1.0+-1.4E-6 which we rescaled assuming a_{{1}}(1260) decays only to 3pi and B(a_1()+- --> pi+- pi+ pi-) = 0.5.


pdgid: S042R28
text:
DALSENO 2012 reports B(B0 --> a_2()+- pi-+) B(a_2()+- --> pi+- pi+ pi-) < 2.2E-6 which we rescaled using B(a_2()+- --> pi+- pi+ pi-) = 1/2 B() = 0.35+-0.013.


pdgid: S042R55
text:
The quoted result is obtained after combining with AUBERT 2004G result by AUBERT 2004R alone gives 33+-4+-5E-6.


pdgid: S042R31
text:
AAIJ 2017BD reports [G(B0 --> p pbar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-)] = 1.07+-0.04+-0.04 which we multiply by our best values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3, B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-) = 99.902+-0.009E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S042R31
text:
Assumes equal production of B0 and B+ from Upsilon(4S) decays. This measurement is quoted for M(pi+ pi-) < 1.22 GeV excluding the 0.46 <  M(pi+ pi-) < 0.53 GeV region.


pdgid: S042B23
text:
Explicitly vetoes resonant production of p pbar from charmonium states and p K0 production from Lambda_{{c}}.


pdgid: S042P22
text:
AAIJ 2017BD reports [G(B0 --> p pbar K+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-)] = 2.34+-0.12+-0.12 which we multiply by our best values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3, B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-) = 99.902+-0.009E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S042P23
text:
AAIJ 2017BD reports [G(B0 --> p pbar K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-)] = 0.045+-0.011+-0.004 which we multiply by our best values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3, B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-) = 99.902+-0.009E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S042P27
text:
AAIJ 2023AD reports 2.2+-0.4+-0.1+-0.1E-8 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> p pbar p pbar)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3,B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3.


pdgid: S042Q85
text:
Excluding charmonium events in 2.85 < mass(Lambda Lambdabar)< 3.128 GeV/c**2  and  3.315 < mass(Lambda Lambdabar)< 3.735 GeV/c**2. Measurements in various mass(Lambda Lambdabar) bins are also reported.


pdgid: S042B08
text:
MEDVEDEVA 2007   reports 2.9+-0.7+-0.5+-0.4E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()- Lambdabar p)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.4+-0.6E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S21
text:
PROCARIO 1994   reports <0.0012 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c()-- Delta()++)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.043, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35E-2.


pdgid: S042S59
text:
Uses Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+ mode. The second error includes the uncertainty of the branching fraction of the Lambda_{{c}} decay, B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = (5.0+-1.3)%.


pdgid: S042S59
text:
PARK 2007   reports 11.2+-0.5+-3.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S59
text:
DYTMAN 2002   reports 1.67+0.27-0.25E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S59
text:
GABYSHEV 2002   reports 1.1+-0.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S55
text:
AUBERT 2008BN reports 1.89+-0.21+-0.49E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambdabar_c()- p)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S55
text:
The second error for GABYSHEV 2003 includes the systematic and the error of Lambda_c --> pbar K+ pi- decay branching fraction.


pdgid: S042S56
text:
AUBERT 2010H  reports 1.94+-0.17+-0.52E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C31
text:
LEES 2015B  reports [G(B0 --> Lambda_c()- p K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 12.5+-2.0+-1.0E-7 which we divide by our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C32
text:
LEES 2015B  reports <1.2E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambda_c()- p phi)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35E-2.


pdgid: S042Q91
text:
AUBERT 2010H  reports [G(B0 --> Sigma_c(2455)- p)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] < 1.5E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35E-2.


pdgid: S042R83
text:
PARK 2007   reports 6.4+-0.4+-1.9E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+ pi- (nonresonant))/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B39
text:
PARK 2007   reports 1.2+-0.1+-0.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2520)-- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B39
text:
GABYSHEV 2002   reports 1.63+0.64-0.58E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2520)-- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042Q84
text:
KIM 2008   reports 0.80+-0.15+-0.25E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)0 N0  ,  N0 --> p pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B26
text:
DYTMAN 2002   reports 2.2+-0.7E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)0 p pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B26
text:
PARK 2007   reports 1.4+-0.2+-0.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)0 p pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B26
text:
GABYSHEV 2002   reports 0.48+0.46-0.41E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)0 p pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B27
text:
DYTMAN 2002   reports 3.7+-1.1E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)-- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B27
text:
PARK 2007   reports 2.1+-0.2+-0.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)-- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B27
text:
GABYSHEV 2002   reports 2.38+0.75-0.69E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)-- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042Q88
text:
AUBERT 2009AG reports 4.33+-0.82+-0.33+-1.13E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambda_c()- p K+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042Q89
text:
AUBERT 2009AG reports 1.11+-0.30+-0.09+-0.29E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)-- p K+  ,  Sigmabar_c()-- --> Lambdabar_c()- pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C20
text:
Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.050+-0.013.


pdgid: S042Q96
text:
The reported uncertainties are statistical, systematic, and Lambdabar_{{c}}()- branching fraction uncertainty.


pdgid: S042Q96
text:
LEES 2011F  reports 3.8+-0.8+-0.2+-1.0E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambdabar_c()- Lambda K+)/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] / [B(Lambda --> p pi-)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2,B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 63.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best values B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2, B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 64.1+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S042P54
text:
LI 2019C  reports 1.16+-0.74+-0.33E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Xibar_c()- Lambda_c()+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.28+-0.32E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R78
text:
LI 2019C  reports 3.32+-0.74+-0.33E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Xibar_c()- Lambda_c()+  ,  Xibar_c()- --> Xibar+ pi- pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.28+-0.32E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R78
text:
AUBERT 2008H  reports 1.5+-1.07+-0.44E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Xibar_c()- Lambda_c()+  ,  Xibar_c()- --> Xibar+ pi- pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R78
text:
CHISTOV 2006A  reports 9.3+3.7-2.8+-3.1E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Xibar_c()- Lambda_c()+  ,  Xibar_c()- --> Xibar+ pi- pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P55
text:
LI 2019C  reports 5.27+-1.51+-0.69E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Xibar_c()- Lambda_c()+  ,  Xibar_c()- --> pbar K+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.28+-0.32E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042A56
text:
Uses B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) based on the CHOUDHURY 2023 to estimate N(B0 Bbar0) pairs.  Omega_{{c}}(2770)0 is partially reconstructed and assumed to exclusively decay to final states  containing Omega_{{c}}()0.


pdgid: S042P77
text:
LEES 2023B searched for psi_{{DS}} in the recoil mass against Lambda and the fully  reconstructed accompanying B meson. The cited upper limit is for m(psi_{{DS}}) between 1 and  4.1 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S042P77
text:
HADJIVASILIOU 2022 searched for psi_{{DS}}, in the mass range 1 -- 3.9 GeV/c**2,  in the recoil mass against Lambda and the accompanying B meson. The cited upper limit is  for m(psi_{{DS}}) = 2.0 GeV/c**2 and is the most stringent. The least stringent limit is  <3.8E-5 at m(psi_{{DS}}) = 3.9 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S042S36
text:
Used combined Belle and Belle II data and B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) =  (48.4+-1.2)%. A signal with 2.5sigma significance, including systematic  uncertainties, is observed, corresponding to a branching fraction 3.7+2.2-1.8+-0.5E-8.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3, B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) =  5.961+-0.033E-2.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.010+-0.029E-3 and B production ratio  f(b --> B_s()0)/f(b --> B0) = 0.256+-0.013.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
This value is obtained from a profile-likelihood fit, see Fig. 9. It corresponds to an uppper limit of < 0.42E-9 at 95% C.L.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
Derived from the combined fit to CMS and LHCb data. Uncertainty includes both statistical and systematic component. Also reports B(B0 --> mu+ mu-)/B(B_s --> mu+ mu-) = 0.14+0.08-0.06.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
Uses B(B+ --> J/psi K+ --> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.01+-0.21E-5 and B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 1.94+-0.06E-5 for normalization.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
Reports also a limit of <7.4E-10 at 95% CL. Uses normalization modes B+ --> J/psi K+ --> mu+ mu- K+ and B0 --> K+ pi-.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
Reports also a limit of <9.2E-10 at 90% CL. and uses B(B+ --> J/psi K+ --> mu+ mu- K+)  = 6.0+-0.2E-5 for normalization.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
Uses B production ratio  f(bbar --> B+)/f(bbar --> B_s()0) = 3.71+-0.47 and three normalization modes.


pdgid: S042R69
text:
Uses B(B0 --> J/psi K^*(892)0) = 1.19+-0.01+-0.08E-3. The second error is the total  systematic uncertainty.


pdgid: S042C49
text:
The limt is obtained as a function of di-muon mass. A normalizing mode branching fraction value of  B(B0 --> K^*()0 mu+ mu-) = 1.6+-0.3E-7 is used.


pdgid: S042C36
text:
AAIJ 2015S  reports 2.11+-0.51+-0.15+-0.16E-8 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> pi+ pi- mu+ mu-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.3+-0.1E-3, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042SN1
text:
A reinterpretation of an old inclusive ALEPH search for b-hadron decays with large missing  energy reported in BARATE 2001E.


pdgid: S042SN1
text:
Identified by fully reconstructing a hadronic decay of the accompanying B meson and requiring no other particles in the event.


pdgid: S042R8
text:
AAIJ 2018T uses normalization modes B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.6+-0.5E-6 and B(B+ --> J/psi K+) =  1.026+-0.031E-3.


pdgid: S042Q92
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011K  reports <180E-8 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambda_c()+ mu-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35E-2.


pdgid: S042Q93
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011K  reports <520E-8 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambda_c()+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35E-2.


pdgid: S042P1
text:
AAIJ 2013AT obtains Gamma((parallel))/Gamma = 0.227+-0.004+-0.011. The relation 1 = ( Gamma(L) + Gamma((perp)) + Gamma((parallel)))/Gamma is used to obtain Gamma(L)/Gamma.


pdgid: S042P1
text:
Measured the angular and lifetime parameters for the time-dependent angular untagged decays B_d()0 --> J/psi K^*0() and B_s()0 --> J/psi phi.


pdgid: S042P1
text:
AFFOLDER 2000N measurements are based on 190 B0 candidates obtained from a data sample of 89pb**-1. The P-wave fraction is found to be 0.13+0.12-0.09+-0.06.


pdgid: S042P1
text:
JESSOP 1997 is the average over a mixture of B0 and B+ decays.  The P-wave fraction is found to be 0.16+-0.08+-0.04.


pdgid: S042A66
text:
AAIJ 2024AN value restricted to q**2< 7.0 GeV**2/c**4. Reports correlation  of -0.18 with the measurement in the region q**2> 7.0 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S042A66
text:
AAIJ 2024AN value restricted to q**2> 7.0 GeV**2/c**4. Reports correlation  of -0.18 with the measurement in the region q**2< 7.0 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S042P5
text:
AUBERT,B 2004W also measures the fraction of parity-odd transverse contribution f(perp) = 0.22+-0.05+-0.02 and the phases of the parity-even and parity-odd transverse amplitudes relative to the longitudinal amplitude.


pdgid: S042CHD
text:
BEHRENS 2000B uses high-momentum lepton tags and partially reconstructed Bbar0 --> D^*()+ pi-, rho- decays to determine the flavor of the Bmeson.


pdgid: S042CHD
text:
ALBRECHT 1994 reports r=0.194+-0.062+-0.054. We convert to chi for comparison.  Uses tagged events (lepton + pion from D^*).


pdgid: S042CHD
text:
BARTELT 1993 analysis performed using tagged events (lepton+pion from D^*).  Using dilepton events they obtain 0.157+-0.016+0.033-0.028.


pdgid: S042CHD
text:
ALBRECHT 1992L is a combined measurement employing several lepton-based techniques.  It uses all previous ARGUS data in addition to new data and therefore supersedes ALBRECHT 1987I.  A value of r = 20.6+-7.0% is directly measured.  The value can be used to measure x = DeltaM/Gamma = 0.72+-0.15 for the B_{{d}} meson. Assumes f(+-)/f(0) = 1.0+-0.05 and uses meanlife(B+-)/meanlife(B0) = (0.95+-0.14) (f(+-)/f(0)).


pdgid: S042CHD
text:
ALBRECHT 1987I is inclusive measurement with like-sign dileptons, with tagged B decays plus leptons, and one fully reconstructed event.


pdgid: S042CHD
text:
Same-sign dilepton events.  Limit assumes semileptonic BR for B+ and B0 equal.  If B0/B+- ratio <0.58, no limit exists.


pdgid: S042D
text:
Uses semileptonic decays of B0 --> D- mu+ nu_mu X and B0 --> D^(*)()- mu+ nu_mu X, where  the D mesons are reconstructed in D- --> K+ pi- pi- and D^(*)()- --> Dbar0 pi- with  Dbar0 --> K+ pi-.


pdgid: S042D
text:
Uses semileptonic decays of B0 --> D- mu+ nu_mu X where the D- mesons are reconstructed in  D- --> K+ K- pi-.


pdgid: S042D
text:
Events with a high transverse momentum lepton were removed and an inclusively reconstructed vertex was required.


pdgid: S042D
text:
HASTINGS 2003 measurement based on the time evolution of dilepton events. It also reports f(+)/f(0) = 1.01+-0.03+-0.09 and CPT violation parameters in B0-Bbar0 mixing.


pdgid: S042D
text:
ZHENG 2003 data analyzed using partially reconstructed Bbar0 --> D^*()- pi+ decay and a flavor tag based on the charge of the lepton from the accompanying B decay.


pdgid: S042D
text:
Data analyzed using partially reconstructed Bbar0 --> D^*()+ lepton- nubar decay and a combination of flavor tags from the rest of the event.


pdgid: S042D
text:
ACCIARRI 1998D combines results from lepton-lepton, lepton-Q(hem), and lepton-lepton with impact parameters.


pdgid: S042D
text:
ABREU 1997N combines results from D^*()+--Q(hem), lepton-Q(hem), pi_s()+- lepton-Q(hem), and lepton-lepton.


pdgid: S042D
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1997V combines results from lepton-lepton, lepton-Q(hem), D^*-lepton, and D^*()+--Q(hem).


pdgid: S042RZ1
text:
The first uncertainty is the uncertainty from Re(z) and the second uncertainty is from  Re(lambda/|lambda|).


pdgid: S042RZ0
text:
Measured using B0 --> J/psi K0S, J/psi K0L, D- pi+, D^*()- pi+, D^*()- rho+, and D^*()- lepton+ nu decays.


pdgid: S042IZ1
text:
Measurement uses B0/Bbar0 --> lepton+ X/lepton- X decays. Assuming DeltaGamma = 0, the result becomes Im(z) = -0.37+-0.54E-2.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
AAIJ 2015F uses semileptonic B0 decays in the inclusive final states D- mu+ and D^*()- mu+, where the D- meson decays into the K+ pi- pi- final state, and the D^*()- meson into the Dbar0(K+ pi-)pi- final state. Reports A_{{{SL}}}^d() = (-0.02+-0.19+-0.30)%, which equals to 4Re(epsilon(B0))/(1+|epsilon(B0)|**2).


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2014 uses the dimuon charge asymmetry with different impact parameters from which it reports A_{{{SL}}}^d() = -0.62+-0.42E-2.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
Uses B0 --> D^*()- X lepton+ nu_lepton and a kaon-tagged sample which yields measurement of A_{{SL}}^d() = (0.06+-0.17+0.38-0.32)%, corresponding to Delta(CP) = 1-|q/p| = 0.29+-0.84+1.88-1.61E-3.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2012AC uses B0 --> D- mu+ X and B0 --> D^*(2010)- mu+ X decays without initial state flavor tagging which yields measurement of A(SL)**d = 6.8+-4.5+-1.4E-3.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
JAFFE 2001 finds a(lepton lepton) = 0.013+-0.050+-0.005 and combines with the previous BEHRENS 2000B independent measurement.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2011U uses the dimuon charge asymmetry with different impact parameters from which it reports A_{{SL}}^d() = -1.2+-5.2E-3.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
BARATE 2001D measured by investigating time-dependent asymmetries in semileptonic and fully inclusive B_{{d}}()0 decays.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
Data analyzed using the time-dependent asymmetry of inclusive B0 decay. The production flavor of B0 mesons is determined using both the jet charge and the charge of secondary vertex in the opposite hemisphere.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1997U assumes CPT and is based on measuring the charge asymmetry in a sample of B0 decays defined by lepton and Q(hem) tags. If CPT is not invoked, Re(epsilon_{{B}}) = -0.006+-0.010+-0.006 is found.  The indirect CPT violation parameter is determined to Im(delta B) = -0.020+-0.016+-0.006.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
BARTELT 1993 finds a(lepton lepton) = 0.031+-0.096+-0.032 which corresponds to |a(lepton lepton)|<0.18, which  yields the above  |Re(epsilon(B0))/(1+|epsilon(B0)|**2)|.


pdgid: S042CQ9
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B0 --> K0 pi+ pi- decays and the first of two equivalent solutions is used.


pdgid: S042AC3
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B0 --> K0 pi+ pi- decays and the first of two consistent solutions that may be preferred.


pdgid: S042CPJ
text:
AAIJ 2020L reports the measurements of C = -0.059+-0.092+-0.020 and DeltaC =  -0.031+-0.092+-0.016 such that C(D^*(2010)- D+) = C - DeltaC.


pdgid: S042CPJ
text:
ROHRKEN 2012 reports the measurements of C = -0.01+-0.11+-0.04 and DeltaC = 0.12+-0.11+-0.03 such that C(D^*(2010)- D+) = C - DeltaC .


pdgid: S042SPJ
text:
AAIJ 2020L reports the measurements of S = -0.861+-0.077+-0.019 and DeltaS =  0.019+-0.075+-0.012 such that S(D^*(2010)- D+) = S - DeltaS.


pdgid: S042SPJ
text:
ROHRKEN 2012 reports the measurements of S = -0.78+-0.15+-0.05 and DeltaS = -0.13+-0.15+-0.04 such that S(D^*(2010)+ D-) = S - DeltaS.


pdgid: S042CPK
text:
AAIJ 2020L reports the measurements of C = -0.059+-0.092+-0.020 and DeltaC =  -0.031+-0.092+-0.016 such that C(D^*(2010)+ D-) = C + DeltaC.


pdgid: S042CPK
text:
ROHRKEN 2012 reports the measurements of C = -0.01+-0.11+-0.04 and DeltaC = 0.12+-0.11+-0.03 such that C(D^*(2010)+ D-) = C + DeltaC .


pdgid: S042SPK
text:
AAIJ 2020L reports the measurements of S = -0.861+-0.077+-0.019 and DeltaS =  0.019+-0.075+-0.012 such that S(D^*(2010)+ D-) = S + DeltaS.


pdgid: S042SPK
text:
ROHRKEN 2012 reports the measurements of S = -0.78+-0.15+-0.05 and DeltaS = -0.13+-0.15+-0.04 such that S(D^*(2010)+ D-) = S + DeltaS.


pdgid: S042LD1
text:
Measured partially reconstructed candidates when one D0 meson is not excplicitely reconstructed. Analysis does not separate CP-even and CP-odd component.


pdgid: S042LD1
text:
AUBERT 2003Q reports |lambda|=0.75+-0.19+-0.02 and Im(lambda)=0.05+-0.29+-0.10. We convert them to S and C parameters taking into account correlations.


pdgid: S042CD+
text:
Measured partially reconstructed candidates when one D0 meson is not excplicitely reconstructed. Extracted under assumption of equal C(+) and C(-).


pdgid: S042SD+
text:
Measured partially reconstructed candidates when one D0 meson is not excplicitely reconstructed. Analysis does not separate CP-even and CP-odd component. Value is obtained from S = -0.34+-0.12+-0.05 using S = S(+) (1 - 2 R((perp))) with R((perp)) = 0.158+-0.029.


pdgid: S042SD-
text:
KRONENBITTER 2012 reported S(-) = 1.52+-0.62+-0.12. A minus sign results from a  different convention, see AUBERT 2009C.


pdgid: S042SDS
text:
This value includes an unknown CP dilution factor D due to possible contributions from intermediate resonances and different partial waves.


pdgid: S042CPR
text:
Time-dependent CP violation is measured in the B0 --> J/psi rho0 and was used to limit the size of penguin amplitude contributions to phi_{{s}} in B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays to be between  [-1.05degree, 1.18degree] at 95% confidence level.


pdgid: S042CDH
text:
BABAR and BELLE combined analysis uses CP-eigenstate decay modes D0 --> K+ K-, K0S pi0, K0S omega,  and h0 = pi0, eta, omega.


pdgid: S042CKP
text:
The measurement is using BELL II data reported in ADACHI 2024. The combination with  ADACHI 2023E is also reported.


pdgid: S042CEK
text:
Asymmetries are measured using B0 --> eta^' K0S decays, with eta^' --> eta ( --> gamma gamma ) pi+ pi- and  eta^' --> rho ( --> pi+ pi- ) gamma.


pdgid: S042CEK
text:
The mixing-induced CP violation is reported with a significance of more than 5 standard deviations in this b --> s penguin dominated mode.


pdgid: S042CF1
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B0 --> K0S K+ K- decays and the first of four consistent solutions that may be preferred.


pdgid: S042SX2
text:
This measurement is performed on all the isobar components, excluding phi K0S and f_0(980) K0S. Note that the nonresonant component is not a CP eigenstate.


pdgid: S042CK0
text:
Requires M (K pi pi) < 1.8 GeV/c**2, 0.6 GeV/c**2 < mass(pi+ pi-) < 0.9 GeV/c**2, mass(K pi) < 0.845 GeV/c**2 or mass(K pi) > 0.945 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S042CKR
text:
Reports value of A(eff) which is equal to -C,  and includes the non-resonant pi+ pi- contribution in the rho0 region.


pdgid: S042SPI
text:
An isospin analysis using other BELLE measurements, disfavors the region of 23.8degree< phi_{{2}}< 66.8degree at 68% CL.


pdgid: S042CX6
text:
Quotes A(pi0 pi0) = -0.14+-0.46+-0.07 (correction published May 22, 2024)  which is equal to -C(pi0 pi0).


pdgid: S042CJ1
text:
The measurement is obtained when sin( 2beta) is fixed to 0.726 and the sign of cos( 2beta) is positive with 86% confidence level.


pdgid: S042CJ2
text:
Analyzes joint data sample of Belle and BaBar using Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi-;  the second error combines experimental systematic uncertainty and the Dalitz plot model uncertainty.


pdgid: S042CJ2
text:
AUBERT 2007BH evaluates the likelihoods for the positive and negative solutions assuming sin(2 beta(eff)) = 0.678. It quotes L(+) / (L(+)+ L(-)) = 0.86 corresponding to a likelihood ratio of L(+)/L(-) = 6.14 in favor of the positive solution.


pdgid: S042CJ2
text:
KROKOVNY 2006 evaluates the likelihoods for the positive and negative solutions assuming sin(2 beta(eff)) = 0.689. It quotes L(+) / (L(+)+ L(-)) = 0.983 corresponding to a likelihood ratio of L(+)/L(-) = 57.8 in favor of the positive solution.


pdgid: S042LD3
text:
Combines the results from fully reconstructed and partially reconstructed D^*() pi events by taking weighted averages. Assumes that systematic errors from physics parameters and fit biases in the two measurements are 100% correlated.


pdgid: S042LD5
text:
Combines the results from fully reconstructed and partially reconstructed D() pi events by taking weighted averages. Assumes that systematic errors from physics parameters and fit biases in the two measurements are 100% correlated.


pdgid: S042A06
text:
Measured in the simultaneous analysis of B0 --> D-+ pi+- decays. AAIJ 2018Z reports a  statistical (systematic) correlation of 0.6 (-0.41) with the measured value of S(-)(B0 --> D+ pi-).


pdgid: S042A07
text:
Measured in the simultaneous analysis of B0 --> D-+ pi+- decays. AAIJ 2018Z reports a  statistical (systematic) correlation of 0.6 (-0.41) with the measured value of S(+)(B0 --> D- pi+).


pdgid: S042CCC
text:
A combination of this Run 2 result with the Run 1 result from AAIJ 2017BN is reported with a  correlation coefficient of 0.40.


pdgid: S042CCC
text:
Measurement based on B0 --> J/psi K0S, B0 --> psi(2S) K0S, B0 --> J/psi K0L, and B0 --> chi_c1(1P) K0S decays.


pdgid: S042CCC
text:
Measurement based on B0 --> J/psi K0S, B0 --> psi(2S) K0S with J/psi --> mu+ mu-,  J/psi --> e+ e- and psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-.


pdgid: S042CCC
text:
AAIJ 2024 provides the correlation coefficient rho=0.441 between the uncertainties of  sin(2beta) and C(c cbar K^(*)()0) (B0 --> c cbar K^(*)()0) measurements.


pdgid: S042CCC
text:
AAIJ 2017BN provides the correlation coefficient rho=0.42 between the uncertainties of  S(B0 --> c cbar K^(*)()0)(B0 --> c cbar K^(*)()0) and C(c cbar K^(*)()0) (B0 --> c cbar K^(*)()0)  measurements.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
SATO 2012 uses 121 fb**-1 data collected on Y(5S) resonance. Uses the ''B-pi tagging'' where B pi+ and B pi- tagged J/psi K0S events are compared.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
Measurement in which the J/psi decays to hadrons or to muons that do not satisfy the standard identification criteria.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
AFFOLDER 2000C uses about 400 B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S events.  The production flavor of B0 was determined using three tagging algorithms: a same-side tag, a jet-charge tag, and a soft-lepton tag.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
BARATE 2000Q uses 23 candidates for B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S decays. A combination of jet-charge, vertex-charge, and same-side tagging techniques were used to determine the B0 production flavor.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1998Z uses 24 candidates for B_d()0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S decay. A combination of jet-charge and vertex-charge techniques were used to tag the B_{{d}}()0 production flavor.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
AAIJ 2024 provides the correlation coefficient rho = 0.441 between the uncertainties of  sin(2beta) and C(c cbar K^(*)()0) (B0 --> c cbar K^(*)()0) measurements.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
AAIJ 2017BN provides the correlation coefficient rho = 0.42 between the uncertainties of  sin(2beta) and cos(2beta) measurements.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
ABE 1998U uses 198+-17 B_d()0 --> J/psi(1S) K0 events. The production flavor of B0 was determined using the same side tagging technique.


pdgid: S042CJK
text:
AAIJ 2024 provides the correlation coefficient rho = 0.441 between the uncertainties of  C(J/psi(nS) K0) (B0 --> J/psi(nS) K0) and S(J/psi(nS) K0) (B0 --> J/psi(nS) K0) measurements.


pdgid: S042CJK
text:
AAIJ 2017BN provides the correlation coefficient rho = 0.42 between the uncertainties of  S(J/psi(nS) K0) (B0 --> J/psi(nS) K0) and C(J/psi(nS) K0) (B0 --> J/psi(nS) K0) measurements.


pdgid: S042CJK
text:
AAIJ 2015N uses 41,560 flavor-tagged B_d() --> J/psi K0S events from 3 fb**-1 of integrated luminosity. Provides the correlation coefficient rho = 0.483 between the statistical uncertainties of and measurements.


pdgid: S042CJK
text:
AAIJ 2013K uses 8200 flavor-tagged B_d --> J/psi KS events from 1 fb**-1 of integrated luminosity. Provides the correlation coefficient rho = 0.42 between the statistical uncertainties of S(J/psi(nS) K0) (B0 --> J/psi(nS) K0) and C(J/psi(nS) K0) (B0 --> J/psi(nS) K0) measurements.


pdgid: S042SJK
text:
SATO 2012 uses 121 fb**-1 data collected at Upsilon(5S) resonance.  Uses the ''B-pi tagging'' where B pi+ and B pi- tagged J/psi K0S events are compared.


pdgid: S042SJS
text:
This S(J/psi K^*()0) value has been corrected for the dilution of the sin(DeltaM Deltat) coefficient of the CP asymmetry by a factor of 1-R((perp)), which arises from the mixture of CP-even and CP-odd B decay amplitudes.


pdgid: S042BFK
text:
Measured using the CP-violation phase difference Deltaphi_{{00}}() between the B and Bbar decay amplitude.


pdgid: S042BGA
text:
Uses fully reconstructed B0 --> D^(*)()+- pi-+ and D+- rho-+ decays and some theoretical assumptions.


pdgid: S042BGA
text:
Uses a time dependent CP violation measurement in B0 --> D-+ pi+- decays with external input  and some theoretical assumptions.


pdgid: S042BGA
text:
Combines the results from fully reconstructed and partially reconstructed D^(*)() pi events by taking weighted averages. Assumes that systematic errors from physics parameters and fit biases in the two measurements are 100% correlated.


pdgid: S042BGA
text:
Uses fully reconstructed B0 --> D^(*)()+- pi-+  decays and some theoretical assumptions, such as the SU(3) symmetry relation.


pdgid: S042BGA
text:
Combining this measurement with the results from AUBERT 2004V for fully reconstructed B0 --> D^(*)()+- pi-+ and some theoretical assumptions, such as the SU(3) symmetry relation.


pdgid: S042BG0
text:
Used a time-dependent Dalitz-plot analysis of B0 --> D()-+ K0 pi()+- assuming the ratio  of the b --> u and b --> c decay amplitudes to be 0.3.


pdgid: S042ALP
text:
Obtained using the time dependent analysis of B0 --> a_1(1260)+- pi-+ and branching fraction measurements of B --> a_1(1260) K and  B --> K_1 pi. Uses SU(3) flavor relations.


pdgid: S042ALP
text:
The angle alpha(eff) is obtained using the measured CP parameters of B0 --> a_1(1260)+- pi-+ and choosing one of the four solutions that is compatible with the result of SM-based fits.


pdgid: S042ALP
text:
Obtained using isospin relation and selecting a solution closest to the CKM best fit average; the 90% CL allowed interval is 59degrees<phi(2) (==alpha) < 115degrees.


pdgid: S042ALP
text:
Obtained using isospin relation and selecting a solution closest to the CKM best fit average; 90% CL allowed interval is 79degrees < alpha  < 123degrees.


pdgid: S042ALP
text:
Obtained from the measured CP parameters of the longitudinal polarization by selecting the solution closest to the CKM best fit central value of alpha = 95degrees - 98degrees.


pdgid: S042XP
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- , K0S K+ K- decays coming from B0 --> D K^*(892)0  modes. The second error is the systematic contribution from the D decay strong-phase inputs and  from the experimental systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: S042AR
text:
Measurement is performed with K+ pi- masses within 50 MeV of the K^*()0 mass and an  absolute value of the cosine of the K^*()0 helicity angle greater than 0.4. Angle gamma  is required to satisfy 0 < gamma < 180 degrees.


pdgid: S042PBH
text:
The last uncertainty is due to uncertainties of B(B0 --> J/psi K^*()0) and B(J/psi --> e+ e-) branching fraction measurements.


pdgid: S042PBF
text:
Uses B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0) = 0.928+-0.013+-0.037E-3 for normalisation and mu+ mu- as a lepton pair. Measured in 1.1 < q**2 < 6.0 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S042A34
text:
Measured from the ratio of K0S mu+ mu-  and K0S e+ e-. Measurements in other q**2 bins  are also reported.


pdgid: S042PBK
text:
Uses B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0) = 0.928+-0.013+-0.037E-3 for normalisation and mu+ mu- as a lepton pair.


pdgid: S042A41
text:
The reported value is converted from the measured dB/dq^2 = 2.6+-0.6+-0.1E-8   (GeV**2/c**4)**-1 by multiplying by the Deltaq^2 = 4.9 GeV**2/c**4  range.


pdgid: S042A03
text:
Measured the differential branching fraction and angular  moments of the decay B0 --> K+ pi- mu+ mu- in  the K+ pi- invariant mass range 1330 < m(K+ pi-) < 1530 MeV/c**2.


pdgid: S042A03
text:
The reported value is converted from the measured dB/dq^2 = 0.82+-0.09+-0.063E-8  (GeV**2/c**4)**-1 by multiplying by the Deltaq^2 = 4.9 GeV**2/c**4  range.


pdgid: S042PAX
text:
AAIJ 2017BF uses B0 --> J/psi K^*()0 decays with B0 transverse momenta pT and  rapidities y in the region of 0 < pT < 30 GeV/c and 2.1 < y < 4.5.


pdgid: S042PAX
text:
Based on time-dependent analysis of B0 --> J/psi K^*()0 decay  in kinematic range pT  > 10 GeV/c and |eta| < 2.5.


pdgid: S042PAX
text:
Based on time-dependent analysis of B0 --> J/psi K^*()0 and B0 --> D- pi+ in kinematic range 4 < pT < 30 GeV/c and 2.5 <eta < 4.5.


pdgid: S042A52
text:
ADACHI 2023H measurement is based on the angular asymmetries of B0 --> D^*()- lepton+ nu_lepton  decays using explicit reconstruction of the B tag. Other asymmetries from Delta(S(3)), Delta(S(5)), Delta(S(7)), and Delta(S(9))  are also reported.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
LEES 2017B measurement is obtained from semileptonic decays to electrons. The result is  averaged over B+- and B0 mesons, assuming lepton universality.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
URQUIJO 2007 report a measurement of (10.07+-0.18+-0.21)% for the partial branching fraction of B --> e nu_e X_c decay with electron energy above 0.6 GeV. We converted the result to B --> e nu_e X branching fraction.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
Uses charge and angular correlations in Upsilon(4S) events with a high-momentum lepton and an additional electron.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
ALBRECHT 1993H analysis performed using tagged semileptonic decays of the B. This technique is almost model independent for the lepton branching ratio.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
The semileptonic branching ratio, |V_cb| and other heavy-quark parameters are determined from a simultaneous fit to moments of the hadronic-mass and lepton-energy distribution.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
Uses the high-momentum lepton tag method.  They also report |V(c b)| = 0.0423+-0.0007(exp) +-0.0020(theo.).


pdgid: S049S45
text:
Uses the high-momentum lepton tag method.  ABE 2002Y also reports |V(c b)| = 0.0408+-0.0010(exp) +-0.0025(theo.). The second error is due to uncertainties of theoretical inputs.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
BARISH 1996B analysis performed using tagged semileptonic decays of the B.  This technique is almost model independent for the lepton branching ratio.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
HENDERSON 1992 measurement employs e and mu.  The systematic error contains 0.004 in quadrature from model dependence. The authors average a variation of the Isgur, Scora, Grinstein, and Wise model with that of the Altarelli-Cabibbo-Corbo-Maiani-Martinelli model for semileptonic decays to correct the acceptance.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
YANAGISAWA 1991 also measures an average semileptonic branching ratio at the Upsilon(5S) of 9.6 -- 10.5% depending on assumptions about the relative production of different B meson species.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
ALBRECHT 1990H uses the model of ALTARELLI 1982 to correct over all lepton momenta.  0.099+-0.006 is obtained using ISGUR 1989B.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
ALBRECHT 1990H uses the model of ALTARELLI 1982 to correct over all lepton momenta.  0.097+-0.006 is obtained using ISGUR 1989B.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
Using data above p(e) = 2.4 GeV, WACHS 1989 determine CS(B --> e nu up)/CS(B --> e nu charm) < 0.065 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S049R17
text:
BARISH 1995 use B(D0 --> K- pi+) = (3.91+-0.08+-0.17)%, B(D^*()+ --> D0 pi+) = (68.1+-1.0+-1.3)%, B(D^*()0 --> D0 pi0) = (63.6+-2.3+-3.3)%.


pdgid: S049R49
text:
This is the lepton-flavor universality ratio R(e mu) for the B+ --> Dbar^*()0 lepton+ nu_lepton  and B0 --> D^*()- lepton+ nu_lepton average.


pdgid: S049R96
text:
ALBRECHT 1993 assumes the GISW model to correct for unseen modes.  Using the BHKT model, the result becomes 0.023+-0.006+-0.004.  Assumes B(D^*()+ --> D0 pi+) = 68.1%, B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.65%, B(D0 --> K- pi+ pi- pi+) = 7.5%.  We have taken their average e and mu value.


pdgid: S049R96
text:
BARISH 1995 use B(D0 --> K- pi+) = (3.91+-0.08+-0.17)%, assume all nonresonant channels are zero, and use GISW model for relative abundances of D^** states.


pdgid: S049R25
text:
BUSKULIC 1997B assumes B(D_1(2420) --> D^* pi) = 1, B(D_1(2420) --> D^* pi+-) = 2/3, and B(b --> B) = 0.378+-0.022.


pdgid: S049R25
text:
BUSKULIC 1995B reports f(B) * B(B --> Dbar_1(2420)0 lepton+ nu_lepton anything) * B(Dbar_1(2420)0 --> Dbar^*(2010)- pi+) = (2.04+-0.58+-0.34)10**-3, where f(B) is the production fraction for a single B charge state.


pdgid: S049R34
text:
Assumes no contribution from B_{{s}} and bbaryons. Further assumes contributions from single pion (D pi and D^* pi) states only, allowing isospin conservation to relate the relative pi0 and pi+ rates.


pdgid: S049R34
text:
BUSKULIC 1997B assumes B(b --> B) = 0.378+-0.022 and uses isospin invariance by assuming that all observed D0 pi+, D^*()0 pi+, D+ pi-, and D^*()+ pi- are from D^** states. A correction has been applied to account for the production of B_{{s}}()0 and Lambda_{{b}}()0.


pdgid: S049R26
text:
A revised number based on BUSKULIC 1997B which assumes B(D_2^*(2460) --> D^* pi+-) = 0.20 and B(b --> B) = 0.378+-0.022.


pdgid: S049R26
text:
BUSKULIC 1995B reports f(B) * B(B --> Dbar_2^*(2460)0 lepton+ nu_lepton anything) * B(Dbar_2^*(2460)0 --> Dbar^*(2010)- pi+) <=0.81E-3 at CL=95%, where f(B) is the production fraction for a single B charge state.


pdgid: S049R27
text:
BUSKULIC 1995B reports f(B) * B(B --> Dbar^*(2010)- pi+ lepton+ nu_lepton anything) = (3.7+-1.0+-0.7)10**-3.  Above value assumes f(B) = 0.37+-0.03.


pdgid: S049S75
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <0.012 from a measurement of [G(B --> D_s()- lepton+ nu_lepton anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S049S76
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <0.008 from a measurement of [G(B --> D_s()- lepton+ nu_lepton K+ anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S049S77
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <0.012 from a measurement of [G(B --> D_s()- lepton+ nu_lepton K0 anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S049S96
text:
The measurement is obtained from semileptonic decays to electrons B --> X e nu, and using a  theoretical model (GAMBINO 2007, GAMBINO 2011) to predict the contribution from B --> X_u e nu. The  result is averaged over B+- and B0 mesons, assuming lepton universality.


pdgid: S049S96
text:
Obtained from a combined fit to the moments of observed spectra in inclusive B --> X_c() lepton+ nu_lepton decay.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Measures several partial branching fractions in different phase space regions. The most inclusive  result of the full branching fraction is obtained in the region for lepton energy in B rest  frame E(lepton)*** > 1 GeV, where the measured partial branching fraction is  DeltaB = 1.59+-0.07+-0.16E-3. The acceptance in that region is reported to be 0.86.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Obtained from the partial rate DeltaB = 1.554+-0.082+0.095-0.086E-3 for the electron  momentum interval of 0.8 -- 2.7 GeV/c based on GGOU1 method (X_c lepton nu, mass(c)  constraint fit of SF parameters).


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Measures several partial branching fractions in different phase space regions. The most precise result on the full branching fraction is obtained in the region for lepton momentum in B rest frame p(lepton)*** > 1 GeV/c, where the measured partial  branching fraction is DeltaB = 1.80+-0.13+-0.15E-3. The acceptance in that region is reported in a private communication by the Authors to be 0.894. The corresponding |V(ub)| from the BLNP method is 4.28+-0.15+-0.18+-0.19E-3, where the last uncertainty comes from theoretical prediction.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Determined from the partial rate DeltaB = 4.41+-0.42+-0.42E-4 measured for electron energy > 2 GeV and hadronic mass squared < 3.5 GeV**2, and calculated acceptance 0.174 in that region. The V_(ub) is measured as 4.41+-0.30+0.65-0.47+-0.28E-3.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Uses electrons in the momentum interval 1.9 -- 2.6 GeV/c in the center-of-mass frame. The V_(ub) is found to be 5.08+-0.47+0.49-0.48E-3.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
BORNHEIM 2002 uses the observed yield of leptons from semileptonic B decays in the end-point momentum interval 2.2 -- 2.6 GeV/c with recent CLEO-2 data on B --> X_s gamma. The V_(ub) is found to be 4.08+-0.34+-0.53E-3.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Measurement requires lepton energy E(lepton)*** > 1 GeV in the B rest frame.  It is a part of the inclusive and exclusive |V(ub)| determination.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Uses a multivariate analysis method and requires lepton momentum in the B rest frame,  p(lepton)***> 1.0 GeV/c.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Measures several partial branching fractions in different phase space regions. The most precise result  is obtained in the region for hadronic mass M(X)< 1.55 GeV/c**2, and is  DeltaB = 1.18+-0.09+-0.07E-3. The corresponding |V_(ub)| from the BLNP  method is 4.27+-0.16+-0.13+-0.30E-3, where the last uncertainty comes from the theoretical prediction of the partial rate in the given phase-space region.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Obtained from the partial rate DeltaB = 0.572+-0.041+-0.065E-3 for the electron momentum interval of 2.0 -- 2.6 GeV/c based on BLNP method.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Used BaBar measurement of Semileptonic branching fraction B(B --> X lepton nu_lepton) = (10.87+-0.18+-0.30)% to convert the ratio of rates to branching fraction.


pdgid: S049S11
text:
BARTELT 1993B (CLEO II) measures an excess of 107+-15+-11 leptons in the lepton momentum interval 2.3 -- 2.6 GeV/c which is attributed to b --> u lepton nu_lepton.  This corresponds to a model-dependent partial branching ratio DeltaB(u b) between 1.15+-0.16+-0.15E-4, as evaluated using the KS model (KOERNER 1988), and 1.54+-0.22+-0.20E-4 using the ACCMM model (ARTUSO 1993).  The corresponding values of |V(u b)|/|V(c b)| are 0.056+-0.006 and 0.076+-0.008, respectively.


pdgid: S049S11
text:
ALBRECHT 1991C result supersedes ALBRECHT 1990. Two events are fully reconstructed providing evidence for the b --> u transition.  Using the model of ALTARELLI 1982, they obtain |V(u b)/V(c b)| = 0.11+-0.012 from 77 leptons in the 2.3 -- 2.6 GeV momentum range.


pdgid: S049S11
text:
ALBRECHT 1990 observes 41+-10 excess e and mu (lepton) events in the momentum interval p = 2.3-2.6 GeV signaling the presence of the b --> u transition. The events correspond to a model-dependent measurement of |V(u b)/V(c b)| = 0.10+-0.01.


pdgid: S049S11
text:
FULTON 1990 observe 76+-20 excess e and mu (lepton) events in the momentum interval p = 2.4-2.6 GeV signaling the presence of the b --> u transition. The average branching ratio, 1.8+-0.4+-0.3E-4, corresponds to a model-dependent measurement of approximately |V(u b)/V(c b)| = 0.1 using B(b --> c lepton nu) = 10.2+-0.2+-0.7%.


pdgid: S049S11
text:
The quoted possible limits range from 0.018 to 0.04 for the ratio, depending on which model or momentum range is chosen.  We select the most conservative limit they have calculated.  This corresponds to a limit on |V(u b)|/|V(c b)| < 0.20.  While the endpoint technique employed is more robust than their previous results in CHEN 1984, these results do not provide a numerical improvement in the limit.


pdgid: S049R09
text:
The correlation of 53% with B(B --> X_u mu+ nu_mu)(letpon energy in B rest frame    E(mu+)*** > 1 GeV) is reported.


pdgid: S049R44
text:
The correlation of 53% with B(B --> X_u e+ nu_e)(letpon energy in B rest frame  E(e+)*** > 1 GeV) is reported.


pdgid: S049R36
text:
The tag-side B meson is reconstructed in a semileptonic decay mode and the signal-side tau  is reconstructed in a purely leptonic decay. The Belle combination of HUSCHLE 2015 and  CARIA 2020 yields R(D) =32.6+-3.4E-2.


pdgid: S049R36
text:
Uses tau+ --> e+ nu_e nubar_tau and tau+ --> mu+ nu_mu nubar_tau and e+ or mu+ as lepton+. Obtained from simultaneous fit to B+ and B0 assuming isospin symmetry.


pdgid: S049R37
text:
Uses leptonic tau decays and a fully reconstructed B meson in hadronic final states as a  tag on the recoil side.


pdgid: S049R37
text:
Uses tau+ --> mu+ nu_mu nubar_tau and mu+ as lepton+. The measurement combines fully  reconstructed D^*()+ sample with sample where only D0 from D^* decays is reconstructed.


pdgid: S049R37
text:
The tag-side B meson is reconstructed in a semileptonic decay mode and the signal-side tau  is reconstructed in a purely leptonic decay. The Belle combination of HUSCHLE 2015,  HIROSE 2017, and CARIA 2020 yields R(D^*) = 0.238+-0.018.


pdgid: S049R37
text:
Uses tau+ --> e+ nu_e nubar_tau and tau+ --> mu+ nu_mu nubar_tau and e+ or mu+ as lepton+. Obtained from simultaneous fit to B+ and B0 assuming isospin symmetry. Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.


pdgid: S049S24
text:
GIBBONS 1997B from charm counting using B(D_s()+ --> phi pi) = 0.036+-0.009 and B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.044+-0.006.


pdgid: S049S24
text:
From the difference between K- and K+ widths. ALAM 1987B measurement relies on lepton-kaon correlations. It does not consider the possibility of B Bbar mixing. We have thus removed it from the average.


pdgid: S049S17
text:
GIBBONS 1997B  reports [G(B --> D+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] = 0.0216+-0.0008+-0.00082 which we divide by our best value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.38+-0.16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S17
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports [G(B --> D+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] = 0.0226+-0.0030+-0.0018 which we divide by our best value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.38+-0.16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S17
text:
ALBRECHT 1991H  reports [G(B --> D+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] = 0.0209+-0.0027+-0.0040 which we divide by our best value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.38+-0.16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S17
text:
BORTOLETTO 1987   reports [G(B --> D+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] = 0.019+-0.004+-0.002 which we divide by our best value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.38+-0.16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S8
text:
GIBBONS 1997B  reports [G(B --> D0/Dbar0 anything)/G(total)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = 0.0251+-0.0006+-0.00075 which we divide by our best value B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.945+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S8
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports [G(B --> D0/Dbar0 anything)/G(total)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = 0.0233+-0.0012+-0.0014 which we divide by our best value B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.945+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S8
text:
ALBRECHT 1991H  reports [G(B --> D0/Dbar0 anything)/G(total)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = 0.0194+-0.0015+-0.0025 which we divide by our best value B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.945+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S8
text:
BORTOLETTO 1987   reports [G(B --> D0/Dbar0 anything)/G(total)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = 0.0210+-0.0015+-0.0021 which we divide by our best value B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.945+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S8
text:
GREEN 1983   reports [G(B --> D0/Dbar0 anything)/G(total)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = 0.024+-0.006+-0.004 which we divide by our best value B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.945+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S12
text:
GIBBONS 1997B reports B(B --> D^*(2010)+ anything) = 0.239+-0.015+-0.014+-0.009 using CLEO measured D and D^* branching fractions.  We rescale to our PDG 1996 values of D and D^* branching ratios. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S12
text:
ALBRECHT 1996D reports B(B --> D^*(2010)+ anything) 0.196+-0.019 using CLEO measured B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.681+-0.01+-0.013, B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 0.0401+-0.0014, B(D0 --> K- pi+ pi+ pi-) = 0.081+-0.005., We rescale to our PDG 1996 values of D and D^* branching ratios. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S12
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 reports B(B --> D^*(2010)+ anything) = 0.25+-0.03+-0.04 using MARKII B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06 and B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 0.042+-0.008. We rescale to our PDG 1996 values of D and D^* branching ratios. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S12
text:
ALBRECHT 1991H  reports 0.348+-0.060+-0.035 from a measurement of [G(B --> D^*(2010)+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.55+-0.04, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S12
text:
BORTOLETTO 1987 uses old MARK III (BALTRUSAITIS 1986E) branching ratios B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 0.056+-0.004+-0.003 and also assumes B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.60+0.08-0.15.  The product branching ratio for B(B --> D^*(2010)+) B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) is 0.13+-0.02+-0.012. Superseded by BORTOLETTO 1992.


pdgid: S049S12
text:
V-A momentum spectrum used to extrapolate below p = 1 GeV.  We correct the value assuming B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 0.042+-0.006 and B(D^*()+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.6+0.08-0.15. The product branching fraction is B(B --> D^*()+ X).B(D^*()+ --> pi+ D0).B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 68+-15+-9E-4.


pdgid: S049R35
text:
GIBBONS 1997B reports B(B --> D^*(2007)0 anything) 0.247+-0.012+-0.018+-0.018 using CLEO measured D and D^* branching fractions.  We rescale to our PDG 1996 values of D and D^* branching ratios. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S14
text:
ARTUSO 2005B  reports 0.0905+-0.0025+-0.0140 from a measurement of [G(B --> D_s()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.4+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S14
text:
AUBERT 2002G  reports [G(B --> D_s()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.00393+-0.00007+-0.00021 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S14
text:
ALBRECHT 1992G  reports [G(B --> D_s()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.00292+-0.00039+-0.00031 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S14
text:
BORTOLETTO 1990   reports [G(B --> D_s()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.00306+-0.00047 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S14
text:
HAAS 1986   reports [G(B --> D_s()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.0038+-0.0010 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S14
text:
GIBAUT 1996   reports 0.1211+-0.0039+-0.0088 from a measurement of [G(B --> D_s()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S14
text:
ALBRECHT 1987H  reports [G(B --> D_s()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.0042+-0.0009+-0.0006 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049R63
text:
AUBERT 2002G  reports [G(B --> D_s^*()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.00284+-0.00029+-0.00025 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049R73
text:
The product branching ratio for B(B --> Dbar D_s0(2317)+)xB(D_s0(2317)+ --> D_s pi0) is measured to be 8.5+2.1-1.9+-2.6E-4.


pdgid: S049R74
text:
The product branching ratio for B(B --> Dbar D_sJ(2457)+)xB(D_sJ(2457)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0 , D_s+ gamma) are measured to be 17.8+4.5-3.9+-5.3E-4 and 6.7+1.3-1.2+-2.0E-4, respectively.


pdgid: S049S36
text:
BARATE 1998Q measures B(B --> D_s^(*) Dbar^(*)) = 0.056+0.021-0.015+0.009-0.008+0.019, where the third error results from the uncertainty on the different Dbranching ratios and is dominated by the uncertainty on B(D_s+ --> phi pi+). We divide B(B --> D_s^(*) Dbar^(*)) by our best value of B(B --> D_s anything)= 0.1+-0.025.


pdgid: S049S54
text:
LESIAK 1992 set a limit on the inclusive process B(b --> s gamma) <2.8E-3 at 90% CL for the range of masses of 892 -- 2045 MeV, independent of assumptions about s-quark hadronization.


pdgid: S049S91
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <4.8E-4 from a measurement of [G(B --> D_s+ pi- ,  D_s^*()+ pi- ,  D_s+ rho- , D_s^*()+ rho- , D_s+ pi0 , D_s^*()+ pi0 , D_s+ eta , D_s^*()+ eta , D_s+ rho0 , D_s^*()+ rho0 , D_s+ omega , D_s^*()+ omega)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S049S91
text:
This branching ratio limit provides a model-dependent upper limit |V(u b)|/|V(c b)| <0.16 at CL=90%.


pdgid: S049R32
text:
Assuming factorization, the decay constant f(D_{{s1}}()+) is at least a factor of 2.5 times smaller than f(D_{{s}}()+).


pdgid: S049S7
text:
AUBERT 2003F also reports the momentum distribution and helicity of J/psi --> lepton+ lepton- in the Upsilon(4S) center-of-mass frame.


pdgid: S049S7
text:
MASCHMANN 1990   reports 1.12+-0.33+-0.25E-2 from a measurement of [G(B --> J/psi(1S) anything)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S7
text:
ALBRECHT 1987D  reports 1.07+-0.16+-0.22E-2 from a measurement of [G(B --> J/psi(1S) anything)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S7
text:
ALAM 1986   reports 1.09+-0.16+-0.21E-2 from a measurement of [G(B --> J/psi(1S) anything)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 0.074+-0.012, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S7
text:
They measure J/psi(1S) --> e+ e- and mu+ mu- and use PDG 1994 values for the branching fractions.  The rescaling is the same for either mode so we use e+ e-.


pdgid: S049S7
text:
BALEST 1995B  reports 1.12+-0.04+-0.06E-2 from a measurement of [G(B --> J/psi(1S) anything)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.0599+-0.0025, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S7
text:
Statistical and systematic errors were added in quadrature. ALBRECHT 1985H also report a CL = 90% limit of 0.007 for B --> J/psi(1S) + X where mass(X) <1 GeV.


pdgid: S049R23
text:
Also reports the measurement of J/psi --> lepton+ lepton- polarization produced directly from B decay.


pdgid: S049R23
text:
BALEST 1995B assume PDG 1994 values for sub mode branching ratios.  J/psi(1S) mesons are reconstructed in J/psi(1S) --> e+ e- and J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-. The B --> J/psi(1S) X branching ratio contains J/psi(1S) mesons directly from B decays and also from feeddown through psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S), chi_c1(1P) --> J/psi(1S), or chi_c2(1P) --> J/psi(1S).  Using the measured inclusive rates, BALEST 1995B corrects for the feeddown and finds the B --> J/psi(1S) (direct) X branching ratio.


pdgid: S049S25
text:
Also reports the measurement of psi(2S) --> lepton+ lepton- polarization produced directly from B decay.


pdgid: S049S25
text:
BALEST 1995B assume PDG 1994 values for sub mode branching ratios. They find B(B --> psi(2S) X, psi(2S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.30+-0.05+-0.04 and B(B --> psi(2S) X, psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 0.37+-0.05+-0.05. Weighted average is quoted for B(B --> psi(2S) X).


pdgid: S049R89
text:
ABE 2002L uses PDG 2001 values for B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) and B(chi_c1,c2 --> J/psi(1S) gamma).


pdgid: S049R89
text:
CHEN 2001   reports 0.00414+-0.00031+-0.00040 from a measurement of [G(B --> chi_c1(1P) anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049R89
text:
BALEST 1995B assume B(chi_c1(1P) --> J/psi(1S) gamma) = 27.3+-1.6E-2, the PDG 1994 value. Fit to psi-photon invariant mass distribution allows for a chi_{{c1}}(1P) and a chi_{{c2}}(1P) component.


pdgid: S049R24
text:
CHEN 2001   reports 0.00383+-0.00031+-0.00040 from a measurement of [G(B --> chi_c1(1P) (direct) anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049R24
text:
BALEST 1995B assume PDG 1994 values. J/psi(1S) mesons are reconstructed in the e+ e- and mu+ mu- modes. The B --> chi_c1(1P) X branching ratio contains chi_{{c1}}(1P) mesons directly from B decays and also from feeddown through psi(2S) --> chi_c1(1P) gamma. Using the measured inclusive rates, BALEST 1995B corrects for the feeddown and finds the B --> chi_c1(1P) (direct) X branching ratio.


pdgid: S049R21
text:
CHEN 2001   reports 9.8+-4.8+-1.5E-4 from a measurement of [G(B --> chi_c2(1P) anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.135+-0.011, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 19.5+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049R21
text:
BALEST 1995B assume B(chi_c2(1P) --> J/psi(1S) gamma) = 13.5+-1.1E-2, the PDG 1994 value. J/psi(1S) mesons are reconstructed in the e+ e- and mu+ mu- modes, and PDG 1994 branching fractions are used. If interpreted as signal, the 35+-13 events correspond to B(B --> chi_c2(1P) X) =0.25+-0.10+-0.03E-2.


pdgid: S049R22
text:
BALEST 1995B assume PDG 1994 values for sub mode branching ratios.  J/psi(1S) mesons are reconstructed in J/psi(1S) --> e+ e- and J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-. Search region 2960 <mass(eta_{{c}}(1S))<3010 MeV/c**2.


pdgid: S049S41
text:
AUSHEV 2010   reports [G(B --> K chi_c1(3872))/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0)] = 0.80+-0.20+-0.10E-4 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0) = 46+-16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S41
text:
GOKHROO 2006   reports [G(B --> K chi_c1(3872))/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> D0 Dbar0 pi0)] = 1.22+-0.31+0.23-0.30E-4 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> D0 Dbar0 pi0) = 55+-28E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049R20
text:
CHOI 2005 reports the observation of a near-threshold enhancement in the omega J/psi mass spectrum in exclusive B --> K omega J/psi. The new state, denoted as chi_{{c0}}(3915), is measured to have a mass of 3943+-11+-13 GeV/c**2 and a width Gamma = 87+-22+-26 MeV.


pdgid: S049S6
text:
ALBRECHT 1993I value is not independent of the sum of B --> K+ anything and B --> K- anything ALBRECHT 1994C values.


pdgid: S049S6
text:
Assuming Upsilon(4S) --> B Bbar, a total of 3.38+-0.34+-0.68 kaons per Upsilon(4S) decay is found (the second error is systematic).  In the context of the standard B-decay model, this leads to a value for (b-quark --> c-quark)/(b-quark --> all) of 1.09+-0.33+-0.13.


pdgid: S049S6
text:
GIANNINI 1982 at CESR-CUSB observed 1.58+-0.35 K0 per hadronic event much higher than 0.82+-0.10 below threshold.  Consistent with predominant b --> c X decay.


pdgid: S049S21
text:
Measurement relies on lepton-kaon correlations. It is for the weak decay vertex and does not include mixing of the neutral B meson.  Mixing effects were corrected for by assuming a mixing parameter r of (18.1+-4.3)%.


pdgid: S049S21
text:
Measurement relies on lepton-kaon correlations. It includes production through mixing of the neutral B meson.


pdgid: S049S26
text:
An average of B(B+ --> K^*(892)+ gamma) and B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 gamma) measurements reported in COAN 2000 by assuming full correlated systematic errors.


pdgid: S049S28
text:
COAN 2000 obtains a fitted signal yield of 15.9+5.7-5.2 events.  A search for contamination by K^*(1410) yielded a rate consistent with 0; the central value assumes no contamination.


pdgid: S049R15
text:
SAITO 2015 measured 3.51+-0.17+-0.33E-4 using a sum-of-exclusive approach in which 38 of the hadronic final states with mass(X_{{s}}) < 2.8 GeV/c**2 are reconstructed. The cut of minimum photon energy is E(gamma) > 1.9 GeV.


pdgid: S049R15
text:
We extrapolate the measured value to E(gamma)> 1.6 GeV using the method of BUCHMUELLER 2006 (average of three theoretical  models).


pdgid: S049R15
text:
Reports 3.21+-0.15+-0.29+-0.08E-4 for 1.8 < E(gamma) < 2.8 GeV, where the last systematic uncertainty is for model dependency. Results with other cutoffs are also reported.


pdgid: S049R15
text:
Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side. The measurement reported is 3.66+-0.85+-0.60E-4 for E(gamma)> 1.9 GeV.


pdgid: S049R15
text:
Measured using sums of seven exclusive final states B --> X_d(s)() gamma where X_{{d}(s)}}() is a nonstrange (strange) charmless hadronic system in mass range 0.5 -- 2.0 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S049R15
text:
Measured using sums of seven exclusive final states B --> X_d(s)() gamma where X_{{d}(s)}}()  is a nonstrange (strange) charmless hadronic system in mass range 0.6 -- 1.8 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S049R15
text:
ABE 2001F reports their systematic errors +-0.42+0.50-0.54E-4, where the second error is due to the theoretical uncertainty. We combine them in quadrature.


pdgid: S049R38
text:
Measured using sums of seven exclusive final states B --> X_d(s)() gamma where X_{{d}(s)}}()   is a nonstrange (strange) charmless hadronic system in mass range 0.6 -- 1.8 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S049R14
text:
ALBRECHT 1995D use full reconstruction of one B decay as tag. Two candidate events for charmless B decay can be interpreted as either b --> s gluon or b --> u transition.  If interpreted as b --> s gluon they find a branching ratio of ~0.026 or the upper limit quoted above. Result is highly model dependent.


pdgid: S049R48
text:
AUBERT,B 2004F reports branching ratio B --> eta^'() X_s() for high momentum eta^'() between 2.0 and 2.7 GeV/c in the Upsilon(4S) center-of-mass frame. X_{{s}} represents a recoil system consisting of a kaon and zero to four pions.


pdgid: S049R48
text:
BONVICINI 2003 observed a signal of 61.2+-13.9 events in B --> eta^' X_nc production for high momentum eta^' between 2.0 and 2.7 GeV/c in the Upsilon(4S) center-of-mass frame. The X_{{nc}} denotes ``charmless'' hadronic states recoiling against eta^'. The second error combines systematic and background subtraction uncertainties in quadrature.


pdgid: S049R48
text:
BROWDER 1998 observed a signal of 39.0+-11.6 events in high momentum B --> eta^' X_s production between 2.0 and 2.7 GeV/c.  The branching fraction is based on the interpretation of b --> s g, where the last error includes additional uncertainties due to the color-suppressed b --> backgrounds.


pdgid: S049R54
text:
Assumes Gamma(B --> rho gamma) = Gamma(B+ --> rho+ gamma)  =  2 Gamma(B0 --> rho0 gamma) and uses lifetime ratio of meanlife(B+)/meanlife(B0) = 1.071+-0.009.


pdgid: S049R54
text:
Assumes Gamma(B --> rho gamma) = Gamma(B+ --> rho+ gamma)  =  2 Gamma(B0 --> rho0 gamma) and uses lifetime ratio of meanlife(B+)/meanlife(B0) = 1.083+-0.017.


pdgid: S049R54
text:
COAN 2000 reports B(B --> rho gamma)/B(B --> K^*(892) gamma) <0.32 at 90%CL and scaled by the central value of B(B --> K^*(892) gamma)=4.24+-0.54+-0.32E-5.


pdgid: S049R9
text:
ALBRECHT 1993 excludes pi+- from K(S)0 and Lambda decays.  If included, they find 4.105+-0.025+-0.080.


pdgid: S049S16
text:
AUBERT 2007C  reports 0.045+-0.003+-0.012 from a measurement of [G(B --> Lambda_c()+ ~/~Lambdabar_c()- anything)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S16
text:
CRAWFORD 1992 result derived from lepton baryon correlations.  Assumes all charmed baryons in B0 and B+- decay are Lambda_{{c}}.


pdgid: S049S16
text:
ALBRECHT 1988E measured B(B --> Lambda_c()+ X).B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = (0.30+-0.12+-0.06)% and used B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = (2.2+-1.0)% from ABRAMS 1980 to obtain above number.


pdgid: S049S16
text:
Assuming all baryons result from charmed baryons, ALAM 1986 conclude the branching fraction is 7.4+-2.9%. The limit given above is model independent.


pdgid: S049R04
text:
LEES 2012 quotes also the measurement G(B --> Lambdabar_c()- lepton+  anything)/G(B --> Lambda_c()+ ~/~Lambdabar_c()- anything) = 1.2+-0.7+-0.4E-2.


pdgid: S049R02
text:
LEES 2012 quotes also the measurement G(B --> Lambdabar_c()- lepton+  anything)/G(B --> Lambdabar_c()- anything) = 1.7+-1.0+-0.6E-2.


pdgid: S049S78
text:
PROCARIO 1994   reports [G(B --> Sigmabar_c()-- anything)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 0.00021+-0.00008+-0.00007 which we divide by our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S79
text:
PROCARIO 1994   reports [G(B --> Sigmabar_c()- anything)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] < 0.00048 which we divide by our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35E-2.


pdgid: S049S80
text:
PROCARIO 1994   reports [G(B --> Sigmabar_c()0 anything)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 0.00023+-0.00008+-0.00007 which we divide by our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S82
text:
PROCARIO 1994   reports <0.0017 from a measurement of [G(B --> Sigmabar_c()0 N (N = p or n))/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.043, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35E-2.


pdgid: S049S9
text:
ALAM 1983B reported their result as >0.036+-0.006+-0.009. Data are consistent with equal yields of p and pbar.  Using assumed yields below cut, B(B --> p + X) = 0.03 not including protons from Lambda decays.


pdgid: S049S10
text:
ALAM 1983B reported their result as >0.022+-0.007+-0.004.  Values are for (B(Lambda X)+B(Lambdabar X))/2.  Data are consistent with equal yields of p and pbar.  Using assumed yields below cut, B(B --> Lambda X) = 0.03.


pdgid: S049S32
text:
ALBRECHT 1992O result is from simultaneous analysis of p and Lambda yields, p pbar and Lambda pbar correlations, and various lepton-baryon and lepton-baryon-antibaryon correlations.  Supersedes ALBRECHT 1989K.


pdgid: S049S32
text:
ALBRECHT 1989K obtain this result by adding their their measurements (5.5+-1.6)% for direct protons and (4.2+-0.5+-0.6)% for inclusive Lambda production. They then assume (5.5+-1.6)% for neutron production and add it in also.  Since each B decay has two baryons, they divide by 2 to obtain (7.6+-1.4)%.


pdgid: S049S43
text:
CRAWFORD 1992 value is not independent of their [Gamma(Lambda pbar anything)+Gamma(Lambdabar p anything)]/Gamma(total) value.


pdgid: S049S42
text:
CRAWFORD 1992 value is not independent of their Gamma(Lambda Lambdabar anything)/Gamma(total) value.


pdgid: S049S3
text:
Measured from sum of exclusive modes through K+, K+ pi0, K+ pi-, K+ pi- pi0, K+ pi- pi+, K(S)0, K0S pi0, K0S pi+, K0S pi+ pi0, and K0S pi + pi- corrected for unobserved modes.


pdgid: S049R76
text:
Measured in the union of 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4. LEES 2012S reports also individual measurements G(B --> K mu+ mu-)/G(B --> K e+ e-) = 0.74+0.40-0.31+-0.06 for 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and [G(B --> K mu+ mu-)G(B --> K e+ e-)] = 1.43+0.65-0.44+-0.12 for q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S049R77
text:
Measured in the union of 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4. LEES 2012S reports also individual measurements G(B --> K^*(892) mu+ mu-)/G(B --> K^*(892) e+ e-) = 1.06+0.48-0.33+-0.08 for 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and [G(B --> K^*(892) mu+ mu-)G(B --> K^*(892) e+ e-)] = 1.18+0.55-0.37+-0.11 for q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S049R61
text:
Assumes equal production rate for charge and neutral B meson pairs, isospin invariance, lepton universality for B --> K lepton+ lepton-, and B(B --> K^*(892) mu+ mu-) = 1.33. The second error is total systematic uncertainties including model dependence.


pdgid: S049R62
text:
Assumes the partial width ratio of electron and muon modes to be Gamma(B --> K^*(892) e+ e-)/Gamma(B --> K^*(892) mu+ mu-) = 1.33.


pdgid: S049R62
text:
For averaging K^*(892) mu+ mu- and K^*(892) e+ e- modes, AUBERT 2002L assumed B(B --> K^*(892) e+ e-)/B(B --> K^*(892) mu+ mu-) = 1.2.


pdgid: S049CP2
text:
Measured with 16 exclusively reconstructed B --> X_s gamma decays with 0.6 < mass(X_{{s}})< 2.0 GeV/c**2 (ten charged and six neutral self-tagging B modes).


pdgid: S049CP2
text:
Uses a sum of exclusively reconstructed B --> X_s() decay modes, with X_{{s}}() mass between 0.6 and 2.8 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S049CP2
text:
This measurement is performed inclusively for recoil mass X_{{s}} less than 2.1 GeV, which corresponds to -0.093 < A_{{CP}}  < 0.096 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S049CP4
text:
Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S). Uses an opposite side lepton tag. Requires center-of-mass frame E(gamma) > 2.1 GeV.


pdgid: S049CP3
text:
Measured from sum of exclusive modes through K+, K+ pi0, K+ pi-, K+ pi- pi0, K+ pi- pi+, K0S pi+, and K0S pi+ pi0.


pdgid: S049CP3
text:
The final state flavor is determined by the kaon and pion charges where modes with X_{{s}} = K(S)0, K0S pi0 or K0S pi+ pi- are not used.


pdgid: S049CPA
text:
Measured from sum of exclusive modes through K+, K+ pi0, K+ pi-, K+ pi- pi0, K+ pi- pi+, K0S pi+, and K0S pi + pi-0.


pdgid: S049CP5
text:
Measured in the union of 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4. LEES 2012S reports also individual measurements A(CP)(B --> K^* lepton+ lepton-) = -0.13+0.18-0.19+-0.01 for 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and A(CP)(B --> K^* lepton+ lepton-) = 0.16+0.18-0.19+-0.01 for q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S049FL9
text:
Measured by combining B0 and B+ with e and mu as leptons. Results are also provided  separately for B0 and B+.


pdgid: S049A20
text:
Events are reconstructed in B0 --> K^*()0 ( --> K+ pi- ) e+ e- and B+ --> K^*()+ ( --> K0S pi+ ) e+ e-  decay modes. The effective dielectron invariant mass is required to be in the range 0.0008 <  q**2 < 1.12 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S049A20
text:
A(T)**Im and A(T)**(2) measure the ratio of the right- and left-handed Wilson  coefficients, C(7)**'/C(7), which constrains non-SM contributions at small q**2.


pdgid: S049PBL
text:
Measured from sum of exclusive modes through K+, K+ pi0, K+ pi-, K+ pi- pi0, K+ pi- pi+, K(S)0,  K0S pi0, K0S pi+, K0S pi+ pi0, and K0S pi + pi- corrected for unobserved modes.


pdgid: S049FB1
text:
Using an unbinned max. likelihood fits to the M(bc) distribution in five q**2 bins for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0.


pdgid: S049FBE
text:
Uses K^* --> K- pi+, K- pi0, K0S pi- in the range M(K pi) < 1.1 GeV/c**2.  Uncertainty is statistical only.


pdgid: S049A00
text:
Uses the sum of 10 exclusive X_{{s}} modes in the range M(X_{{s}}) > 1.1 GeV/c**2.  Uncertainty is statistical only.


pdgid: S049A07
text:
Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side. The result is for E(gamma)  > 2.2 GeV.


pdgid: S049IS1
text:
Uses the production ratio of charged and neutral B from Upsilon(4S) decays and the lifetime ratio meanlife(B+)/meanlife(B0) = 1.071+-0.009.  The 90% CL interval is 0.017< Delta(0+)< 0.116


pdgid: S049IS1
text:
Uses the production ratio of charged and neutral B from Upsilon(4S) decays R**+/0 = 1.006+-0.048 and the lifetime ratio of tau(B+) / tau(B0) = 1.083+-0.017. The 90% CL interval is -0.046 < Delta(0+) < 0.146.


pdgid: S049IA3
text:
For 1.0 < q**2 < 6.0 GeV**2/c**4 using both mu+ mu- and e+ e- as a  lepton pair. Measurements in other q**2 bins are also reported.


pdgid: S049IA3
text:
For 1.1 < q**2 < 6.0 GeV**2/c**4 using mu+ mu- as a lepton pair and assuming isospin symmetry for the B --> J/psi(1S) K. Measurements in other q**2 bins are also reported.


pdgid: S049IA3
text:
For 15.0 < q**2 < 19.0 GeV**2/c**4 using mu+ mu- as a lepton pair and assuming isospin symmetry for the B --> J/psi(1S) K. Measurements in other q**2 bins are also reported.


pdgid: S049IA4
text:
For 1.1 < q**2 < 6.0 GeV**2/c**4 using mu+ mu- as a lepton pair and assuming isospin symmetry for the B(B --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)). Measurements in other q**2 bins are also reported.


pdgid: S049IA4
text:
For 15.0 < q**2 < 22.0 GeV**2/c**4 using mu+ mu- as a lepton pair and assuming isospin symmetry for the B(B --> J/ psi(1S) K^*(892)). Measurements in other q**2 bins are also reported.


pdgid: S049AEL
text:
The leptons are required to have E(l) > 1.5 GeV in the B rest frame. The result with E(l) > 0.6 GeV is also given.


pdgid: S049AEL
text:
Uses E(e) > 1.5 GeV and also reports moments with other minimum minimum  E(e) conditions, as low as E(e) > 0.6 GeV.


pdgid: S049GM1
text:
LEES 2012U uses E(gamma) > 1.897 GeV to calculate the moments; the moments are used to calculate the HQET parameters mass(b) = 4.579+0.032-0.029 GeV/c**2 and mu_{{pi}}^2() = 0.257+0.034-0.039GeV**2 in the shape function model. The same HQET parameters are also determined in the kinetic model.


pdgid: S051T
text:
ABREU 1994L uses charged particle impact parameters. Their result from inclusively reconstructed secondary vertices is superseded by ABREU 1996E.


pdgid: S051T
text:
ABREU 1992 is combined result of muon and hadron impact parameter analyses.  Hadron tracks gave (12.7+-0.4+-1.2)*10**-13s for an admixture of B species weighted by production fraction and mean charge multiplicity, while muon tracks gave (13.0+-1.0+-0.8)*10**-13s for an admixture weighted by production fraction and semileptonic branching fraction.


pdgid: S051T
text:
BUSKULIC 1992G use J/psi(1S) tags to measure the average b lifetime.  This is comparable to other methods only if the J/psi(1S) branching fractions of the different b-flavored hadrons are in the same ratio.


pdgid: S051T
text:
Using Z --> e+ X or mu+ X, ADEVA 1991H determined the average lifetime for an admixture of B hadrons from the impact parameter distribution of the lepton.


pdgid: S051T
text:
Using Z --> J/psi(1S) X, J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-, ALEXANDER 1991G determined the average lifetime for an admixture of B hadrons from the decay point of the J/psi(1S).


pdgid: S051T
text:
Using Z --> e X or mu X, DECAMP 1991C determines the average lifetime for an admixture of B hadrons from the signed impact parameter distribution of the lepton.


pdgid: S051T
text:
LYONS 1990 combine the results of the B lifetime measurements of ONG 1989, BRAUNSCHWEIG 1989B, KLEM 1988, and ASH 1987, and JADE data by private communication. They use statistical techniques which include variation of the error with the mean life, and possible correlations between the systematic errors.  This result is not independent of the measured results used in our average.


pdgid: S051T
text:
We have combined an overall scale error of 15% in quadrature with the systematic error of +-0.7 to obtain +-2.1 systematic error.


pdgid: S051DTB
text:
Data analyzed using both the jet charge and the charge of secondary vertex in the opposite hemisphere.


pdgid: S051R9
text:
The analysis is based on a neural network, to estimate the charge of the weakly-decaying bhadron by distinguishing its decay products from particles produced at the primary vertex.


pdgid: S051R41
text:
AAIJ 2020V measures the average value using the observed B_s()0 --> J/psi phi and B+ --> J/psi K+ yields,  over the ranges b-hadron pT of 0.5 and 40 GeV and eta of 2.0 and 6.5.  The value is not used in averages as BR-related systematic uncertainties are not evaluated.


pdgid: S051R41
text:
AAIJ 2020V  reports [G(bbar --> B_s()0)/G(bbar --> B+)] * [B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] = 0.1238+-0.0010+-0.0022 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi) = 1.03+-0.04E-3, B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R41
text:
AAIJ 2020V  reports [G(bbar --> B_s()0)/G(bbar --> B+)] * [B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] = 0.1270+-0.0007+-0.0022 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi) = 1.03+-0.04E-3, B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R41
text:
AAIJ 2020V  reports [G(bbar --> B_s()0)/G(bbar --> B+)] * [B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] = 0.1326+-0.0007+-0.0023 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi) = 1.03+-0.04E-3, B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R2
text:
AAIJ 2019AD  measured the average value using b-hadron semileptonic decays and assuming  isospin symmetry for b-hadron pT of 4 and 25 GeV and eta of 2 and 5.


pdgid: S051R2
text:
AAIJ 2011F measured f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.253+-0.017+-0.017+-0.020, where the errors are statistical, systematic, and theoretical. We divide their value by 2. Our second error combines systematic and theoretical uncertainties.


pdgid: S051R2
text:
AALTONEN 2008N  reports [G(bbar --> B_s()0)/[G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)]] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 5.76+-0.18+0.45-0.42E-3 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R2
text:
ABE 1999P uses the numbers of K^*(892)0, K^*(892)+, and phi(1020) events produced in association with the double semileptonic decays b --> c mu- X with c --> s mu+ X.


pdgid: S051R01
text:
AAD 2015CM measurement is derived from the observed B_s()0 --> J/psi phi and B_d()0 --> J/psi K^*()0  yields  and a recent theory prediction of B(B_s()0 --> J/psi phi)/B(B_d()0 --> J/psi K^*()0).   The second uncertainty combines in quadrature systematic and theoretical uncertainties.


pdgid: S051R01
text:
AAIJ 2013P studies also separately the pT(B) and eta(B) dependency of G(bbar --> B_s()0)/G(bbar --> B0),   finding f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}(pT)= (0.256+-0.020) + (-2.0+-0.6) E-3 /GeV/c  (pT-<pT>) and f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}(eta)= (0.256+-0.020) + (0.005+-0.006)  (eta-<eta>), where <pT> = 10.4 GeV/c and <eta> = 3.28.  AAIJ 2013P reports the measurement as 0.238+-0.004+-0.015+-0.021 where the last  uncertainly is theoretical.


pdgid: S051R01
text:
AAIJ 2021Y uses hadronic decays B0 --> D- pi+, B0 --> D- K+, B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+ and  B_s()0 --> J/psi phi as well as semileptonic B0 and B_{{s}}()0 decays. Measured within the  pT range [0.5,40] GeV/c, eta range [2, 6.4].


pdgid: S051R3
text:
AAIJ 2019AD measured the average value for Lambda_{{b}}()0 using semileptonic decays and  assuming isospin symmetry for b-hadron pT of 4 and 25 GeV and eta of 2 and 5.


pdgid: S051R3
text:
AAIJ 2012J measured the ratio to be (0.404+-0.017+-0.027+-0.105) x [1  - (0.031+-0.004+-0.003)xP(T)]using b-hadron semileptonic decays where  the P(T) is the momentum of charmed hadron-muon pair in GeV/c.We quote their weighted average  value where  the second error combines systematic and the error on B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+).


pdgid: S051R3
text:
AALTONEN 2009E errata to the measurement reported in AFFOLDER 2000E using the pT  spectra from fully reconstructed B0 and Lambda_{{b}}() decays.


pdgid: S051R3
text:
AALTONEN 2008N  reports [G(bbar --> b-baryon)/[G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)]] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 14.1+-0.6+5.3-4.4E-3 which we divide by our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R6
text:
ACCIARRI 1996C assumes relative b semileptonic decay rates e:mu:tau of 1:1:0.25. Based on missing-energy spectrum.


pdgid: S051S45
text:
Uses the combination of lepton transverse momentum spectrum and the correlation between the charge of the lepton and opposite jet charge.  The first error is statistic and the second error is the total systematic error including the modeling.


pdgid: S051S45
text:
ABBIENDI 2000E result is determined by comparing the distribution of several kinematic variables of leptonic events in a lifetime tagged Z --> b bbar sample using artificial neural network techniques. The first error is statistic; the second error is the total systematic error.


pdgid: S051S45
text:
ACCIARRI 2000 result obtained from a combined fit of R(b)= Gamma(Z --> b bbar)/Gamma(Z --> hadrons) and B(b --> lepton nu X), using double-tagging method.


pdgid: S051S45
text:
ABREU 1995D give systematic errors +-0.0019 (model) and 0.0012 (R(c)). We combine these in quadrature.


pdgid: S051S45
text:
BUSKULIC 1994G uses e and mu events. This value is from a global fit to the lepton p and pT (relative to jet) spectra which also determines the b and c production  fractions, the fragmentation functions, and the forward-backward asymmetries.  This branching ratio depends primarily on the ratio of dileptons to single leptons at high pT, but the lower pT portion of the lepton spectrum is included in the global fit to reduce the model dependence.  The model dependence is +-0.0026 and is included in the systematic error.


pdgid: S051S45
text:
ABREU 1993C event count includes e e events.  Combining e e, mu mu, and e mu events, they obtain 0.100+-0.007+-0.007.


pdgid: S051S1
text:
ADEVA 1991C measure the average B(b --> e X) branching ratio using single and double tagged b enhanced Z events. Combining e and mu results, they obtain 0.113+-0.010+-0.006.  Constraining the initial number of b quarks by the Standard Model prediction (378+-3 MeV) for the decay of the Z into b bbar, the electron result gives 0.112+-0.004+-0.008. They obtain 0.119+-0.003+-0.006 when e and mu results are combined.  Used to measure the b bbar width itself, this electron result gives 370+-12+-24 MeV and combined with the muon result gives 385+-7+-22 MeV.


pdgid: S051S1
text:
ABE 1993E experiment also measures forward-backward asymmetries and fragmentation functions for b and c.


pdgid: S051S2
text:
ABREU 1993C event count includes mu mu events.  Combining e e, mu mu, and e mu events, they obtain 0.100+-0.007+-0.007.


pdgid: S051S2
text:
ADEVA 1991C measure the average B(b --> e X) branching ratio using single and double tagged b enhanced Z events. Combining e and mu results, they obtain 0.113+-0.010+-0.006.  Constraining the initial number of b quarks by the Standard Model prediction (378+-3 MeV) for the decay of the Z into b bbar, the muon result gives 0.123+-0.003+-0.006. They obtain 0.119+-0.003+-0.006 when e and mu results are combined.  Used to measure the b bbar width itself, this muon result gives 394+-9+-22 MeV and combined with the electron result gives 385+-7+-22 MeV.


pdgid: S051R15
text:
ABREU 2000R reports their experiment's uncertainties +-0.0019+-0.0016+-0.0018, where the first error is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is the uncertainty due to the Dbranching fraction.  We combine first two in quadrature.


pdgid: S051R15
text:
AKERS 1995Q  reports [G(bbar --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton  anything)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] = 1.82+-0.20+-0.12E-3 which we divide by our best value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.38+-0.16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R16
text:
ABREU 2000R reports their experiment's uncertainties +-0.0034+-0.0036+-0.0017, where the first error is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is the uncertainty due to the Dbranching fraction.  We combine first two in quadrature.


pdgid: S051R16
text:
AKERS 1995Q  reports [G(bbar --> Dbar0 lepton+ nu_lepton  anything)/G(total)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = 2.52+-0.14+-0.17E-3 which we divide by our best value B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.945+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R17
text:
ABREU 2000R reports their experiment's uncertainties +-0.0017+-0.0013+-0.0009, where the first error is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is the uncertainty due to the Dbranching fraction.  We combine first two in quadrature.


pdgid: S051R17
text:
AKERS 1995Q reports [B(bbar --> D^* lepton+ nu_lepton X) * B(D^*()+ --> D0 pi+) * B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = (7.53+-0.47+-0.56E-4) and uses B(D^*()+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.681+-0.013 and B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 0.0401+-0.0014 to obtain the above result.  The first error is the experiments error and the second error is the systematic error from the D^*()+ and D0 branching ratios.


pdgid: S051R31
text:
Obtained from the best fit of the MC simulated events to the data based on the b --> X_u lepton nu neutral network output distributions.


pdgid: S051R31
text:
ABREU 2000D result obtained from a fit to the numbers of decays in  b --> u enriched and depleted samples and their lepton spectra, and assuming |V(c b)|= 0.0384+-0.0033 and tau(b)= 1.564+-0.014ps.


pdgid: S051S94
text:
ABREU 1995D give systematic errors +-0.0033 (model) and 0.0032 (R(c)). We combine these in quadrature. This result is from the same global fit as their Gamma(bbar --> lepton+ nu_lepton X) data.


pdgid: S051S94
text:
BUSKULIC 1994G uses e and mu events. This value is from the same global fit as their Gamma(bbar --> lepton+ nu_lepton anything)/Gamma(total) data.


pdgid: S051R24
text:
BUSKULIC 1996Y  reports 0.605+-0.024+-0.016 from a measurement of [G(bbar --> Dbar0  anything)/G(total)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] assuming B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 0.0383, which we rescale to our best value B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.945+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R70
text:
The second error is the total of systematic uncertainties including the branching fractions used in the measurement.


pdgid: S051R25
text:
BUSKULIC 1996Y  reports 0.234+-0.013+-0.010 from a measurement of [G(bbar --> D-  anything)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] assuming B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 0.091, which we rescale to our best value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.38+-0.16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R32
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1997W assumes B(D_2^*(2460)0 --> D^*()+ pi-) = 0.21+-0.04 and Gamma(b bbar)/Gamma(hadrons) = 0.216 at Z decay.


pdgid: S051R26
text:
BUSKULIC 1996Y  reports 0.183+-0.019+-0.009 from a measurement of [G(bbar --> D_s^-  anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R27
text:
BUSKULIC 1996Y  reports 0.110+-0.014+-0.006 from a measurement of [Gamma(b --> Lambda_c+  anything)/Gamma(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.044, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R28
text:
ABREU 1998D results are extracted from a fit to the b-tagging probability distribution based on the impact parameter.


pdgid: S051R28
text:
BUSKULIC 1996Y assumes PDG 1996 production fractions for B0, B+, B_{{s}}, b baryons, and PDG 1996 branching ratios for charm decays. This is sum of their inclusive Dbar0, D-, Dbar_{{s}}, and Lambda_{{c}} branching ratios, corrected to include inclusive Xi_{{c}} and charmonium.


pdgid: S051S7
text:
ABREU 1994P is an inclusive measurement from b decays at the Z.  Uses J/psi(1S) --> e+ e- and mu+ mu- channels. Assumes Gamma(Z --> b bbar)/Gamma(hadron)=0.22.


pdgid: S051S7
text:
ADRIANI 1993J is an inclusive measurement from b decays at the Z.  Uses J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu- and J/psi(1S) --> e+ e- channels.


pdgid: S051S7
text:
ADRIANI 1992 measurement is an inclusive result for B(Z --> J/psi(1S) X) = 4.1+-0.7+-0.3E-3 which is used to extract the b-hadron contribution to J/psi(1S) production.


pdgid: S051S25
text:
ABREU 1994P is an inclusive measurement from b decays at the Z.  Uses psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-, J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu- channels. Assumes Gamma(Z --> b bbar)/Gamma(hadron)=0.22.


pdgid: S051R95
text:
AAIJ 2012BD reports B(b --> psi (2S) X) = 3.08+-0.07+-0.36+-0.27E-3 and we  divided our best value of B(b --> psi (1S) X) = 1.16+-0.10E-2 as the ratio listed here.


pdgid: S051R95
text:
CHATRCHYAN 2012AK really reports Gamma(51)/Gamma = 3.08+-0.12+-0.13+-0.42E-3 assuming PDG 2010 value of Gamma(50)/Gamma = 1.16+-0.10E-2 which we present as a ratio  of Gamma(51)/Gamma(50) = 26.5+-1.0+-1.1+-2.8E-2.


pdgid: S051R95
text:
CHATRCHYAN 2012AK reports 26.5+-1.0+-1.1+-2.8E-2 from a measurement of [G(bbar --> psi(2S)  anything)/G(bbar --> J/psi(1S)  anything)] * [B(psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = 7.7+-0.8E-3,B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.93+-0.06E-2, which we rescale to our best values B(psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = 8.0+-0.6E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R43
text:
AAIJ 2024AP reports [G(bbar --> chi_c0(1P) anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar)] = 6.74+-1.18+-0.62E-7 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar) = 2.21+-0.14E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R00
text:
AAIJ 2017BB reports [G(bbar --> chi_c0(1P) anything)/G(bbar --> eta_c(1S) anything)] / [B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> phi phi)] = 0.147+-0.023+-0.011 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi) = 1.8+-0.4E-3, B(chi_c0(1P) --> phi phi) = 8.48+-0.31E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R89
text:
AAIJ 2024AP reports [G(bbar --> chi_c1(1P)  anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar)] = 3.88+-0.91+-0.36E-7 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar) = 7.6+-0.4E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R89
text:
ABREU 1994P  reports 1.4+-0.6+0.4-0.2E-2 from a measurement of [G(bbar --> chi_c1(1P)  anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 27.3+-1.6E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R89
text:
ADRIANI 1993J  reports 2.4+-0.9+-0.2E-2 from a measurement of [G(bbar --> chi_c1(1P)  anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 27.3+-1.6E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051S59
text:
ADRIANI 1993J is a ratio of inclusive measurements from b decays at the Z using only the J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu- channel since some systematics cancel.


pdgid: S051R05
text:
AAIJ 2024AP reports [G(bbar --> chi_c1(1P)  anything)/G(bbar --> chi_c0(1P) anything)] / [B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar)] = 0.58+-0.23+-0.02 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar) = 2.21+-0.14E-4, B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar) = 7.6+-0.4E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R05
text:
AAIJ 2017BB reports [G(bbar --> chi_c1(1P)  anything)/G(bbar --> chi_c0(1P) anything)] / [B(chi_c0(1P) --> phi phi)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> phi phi)] = 0.50+-0.11+-0.01 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(chi_c0(1P) --> phi phi) = 8.48+-0.31E-4, B(chi_c1(1P) --> phi phi) = 4.26+-0.21E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R03
text:
AAIJ 2017BB reports [G(bbar --> chi_c1(1P)  anything)/G(bbar --> eta_c(1S) anything)] / [B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> phi phi)] = 0.073+-0.016+-0.006 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi) = 1.8+-0.4E-3, B(chi_c1(1P) --> phi phi) = 4.26+-0.21E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R44
text:
AAIJ 2024AP reports [G(bbar --> chi_c2(1P) anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar)] = 1.13+-0.83+-0.10E-7 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar) = 7.3+-0.4E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R06
text:
AAIJ 2024AP reports [G(bbar --> chi_c2(1P) anything)/G(bbar --> chi_c0(1P) anything)] / [B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar)] * [B(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar)] = 0.17+-0.12+-0.01 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar) = 2.21+-0.14E-4, B(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar) = 7.3+-0.4E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R06
text:
AAIJ 2017BB reports [G(bbar --> chi_c2(1P) anything)/G(bbar --> chi_c0(1P) anything)] / [B(chi_c0(1P) --> phi phi)] * [B(chi_c2(1P) --> phi phi)] = 0.56+-0.10+-0.01 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(chi_c0(1P) --> phi phi) = 8.48+-0.31E-4, B(chi_c2(1P) --> phi phi) = 1.23+-0.07E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R04
text:
AAIJ 2017BB reports [G(bbar --> chi_c2(1P) anything)/G(bbar --> eta_c(1S) anything)] / [B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi)] * [B(chi_c2(1P) --> phi phi)] = 0.081+-0.013+-0.005 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi) = 1.8+-0.4E-3, B(chi_c2(1P) --> phi phi) = 1.23+-0.07E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R07
text:
AAIJ 2017BB reports [G(bbar --> eta_c(2S) anything  ,  eta_c --> phi phi)/G(bbar --> eta_c(1S) anything)] / [B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi)] = 0.040+-0.011+-0.004 which we multiply by our best value B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi) = 1.8+-0.4E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R5
text:
ADAM 1996 measurement obtained from a fit to the rapidity distribution of pi0**'s in Z --> b b events.


pdgid: S051R36
text:
Measured from R = [B(bbar --> Xi_b()+)xB(Xi_b() --> J/psi Xi+)]/[B(bbar --> Lambdabar_b()0)xB(Lambdabar_b()0 --> J/psi Lambdabar0)] and  assumes width(Xi_b()+ --> J/psi Xi+)/width(Lambdabar_b()0 --> J/psi Lambdabar0) =  3/2 related through SU(3) flavor symmetry.


pdgid: S051R29
text:
Average branching fraction of weakly decaying B hadrons into two long-lived charged hadrons, weighted by their production cross section and lifetimes.


pdgid: S051R7
text:
ABREU 1998D results are extracted from a fit to the b-tagging probability distribution based on the impact parameter. The expected hidden charm contribution of 0.026+-0.004 has been subtracted.


pdgid: S051S4
text:
Both ABBOTT 1998B and GLENN 1998 claim that the efficiency quoted in ALBAJAR 1991C was overestimated by a large factor.


pdgid: S051R20
text:
GROSSMAN 1996 limit is derived from the ALEPH BUSKULIC 1995 limit B(B+ --> tau+ nu_tau) <1.8E-3 at CL=90% using conservative simplifying assumptions.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
The average B mixing parameter is determined simultaneously with b and c forward-backward asymmetries in the fit.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
ACCIARRI 1999D uses maximum-likelihood fits to extract chi_{{b}} as well as the A(FB)**b in Z --> b bbar events containing prompt leptons.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
This ABREU 1994J result is from 5182 lepton lepton and 279 Lambda lepton events. The systematic error includes 0.004 for model dependence.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
ALEXANDER 1996 uses a maximum likelihood fit to simultaneously extract chi as well as the forward-backward asymmetries in e+ e- --> Z --> b bbar and c cbar.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
ABREU 1994F uses the average electric charge sum of the jets recoiling against a b-quark jet tagged by a high p(T) muon. The result is for chibar = f_d chi_d+0.9f_s chi_s.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
This ABREU 1994J result combines lepton lepton, Lambda lepton, and jet-charge lepton (ABREU 1994F) analyses. It is for chibar = f(d)chi_{{d}}+0.96f(s)chi_{{s}}.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
ADEVA 1990P measurement uses e e, mu mu, and e mu events from 118k events at the Z. Superseded by ADEVA 1992C.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
These experiments are not in the average because the combination of B_{{s}} and B_{{d}} mesons which they see could differ from those at higher energy.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
The WEIR 1990 measurement supersedes the limit obtained in SCHAAD 1985. The 90% CL are 0.06 and 0.38.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
ALBAJAR 1987C measured chi = (Bbar0 --> B0 --> mu+ X) divided by the average production weighted semileptonic branching fraction for B hadrons at 546 and 630 GeV.


pdgid: S051EPS
text:
AABOUD 2017E reports a measurement of charge asymmetry of A(SL)**b = -25+-21+-19E-3 in  lepton + jets t tbar events in which a b-hadron decays semileptonically to a soft muon.


pdgid: S051EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2014 reports a measurement of like-sign dimuon charge asymmetry of A(SL)**b = -4.96+-1.53+-0.72E-3 in semileptonic b-hadron decays.


pdgid: S051EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2011U reports a measurement of like-sign dimuon charge asymmetry of A_{{SL}}^b() = -7.87+-1.72+-0.93E-3 in semileptonic b-hadron decays.


pdgid: S051EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2010H reports a measurement of like-sign dimuon charge asymmetry of A(SL)**b=-9.57+-2.51+-1.46E-3 in semileptonic b-hadron decays. Using the measured production ratio of B_{{d}}()0 and B_{{s}}()0, and the asymmetry of B_{{d}}()0 A(SL)**d=-4.7+-4.6E-3 measured from B-factories, they obtain the asymmetry for B_{{s}}()0 as A(SL)**s=-14.6+-7.5E-3.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
PRIM 2024 value established from a complete set of angular coefficients for exclusive B --> Dbar^* lepton+ nu_lepton  decays with hadronic tag-side reconstruction. The |V_(cb)|xF(1) is  derived from the extracted the BGL and CNL form factor parameters: |V_(cb)|(BGL)  = 40.7+-0.7E-3 with the zero-recoil lattice QCD point F(1) = 0.900+-0.009 and  |V_(cb)|(CNL) = 40.3+-0.6E-3.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
ADACHI 2023J result comes from differential shapes of exclusive B --> D^* lepton- nu_lepton  (lepton = e or mu) decays. Using CNL form factor parametrization and the zero-recoil  lattice QCD point F(1) = 0.906+-0.013 ADACHI 2023J finds  |V(cb)|(CNL) = 40.57+-0.31+-0.95+-0.58E-3 where the last uncertainty  is due to the prediction of F(1). Also reports a measurement of  |V(cb)|(BGL) = 40.13+-0.27+-0.93+-0.58E-3 using BGL form factors  parametrization.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
WAHEED 2021 uses fully reconstructed D^*()- lepton+ nu events (lepton = e or  mu) and  eta_{{EW}} = 1.0066.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
Obtained from a global fit to B --> D^(*)() lepton nu_lepton events, with reconstructed D0 lepton and D+ lepton final states and rho**2 = 1.22+-0.02+-0.07.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
Average of the B0 --> D^*(2010)- lepton+ nu and B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)) lepton+ nu modes with rho**2 = 1.61+-0.09+-0.21 and f(+-) = 0.521+-0.012.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
ABREU 2001H measured using about 5000 partial reconstructed D^* sample with a rho**2=1.34+-0.14+0.24-0.22.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
ABBIENDI 2000Q: measured using both inclusively and exclusively reconstructed D^*()+- samples with a rho**2=1.21+-0.12+-0.20. The statistical and systematic correlations between |V_(cb)|*F(1) and rho**2 are 0.90 and 0.54 respectively.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
BUSKULIC 1997: measured using exclusively reconstructed D^*()+- with a a**2=0.31+-0.17+-0.08. The statistical correlation is 0.92.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
Measured from differential shapes of exclusive B --> D^* lepton- nu_lepton decays with hadronic  tag-side reconstruction and extracting the CNL and BGL form factor parameters. PRIM 2023  finds |V(cb)|(CNL) = 40.2+-0.9E-3 with the zero-recoil lattice QCD point  F(1) = 0.906+-0.013. PRIM 2023 provides also a measurement of  |V(cb)|(BGL) = 40.7+-1.0E-3.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
Measured using the dependence of B- --> D^*()0 e- nubar_e decay differential rate and the form factor description by CAPRINI 1998 with rho**2 = 1.16+-0.06+-0.08.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
Measured using exclusive B0 --> D^*(892)- e+ nu decays with rho**2= 1.35+-0.17+-0.19 and a correlation of 0.91.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
BARISH 1995: measured using both exclusive reconstructed B0 --> D^*()- lepton+ nu and B+ --> D^*()0 lepton+ nu samples.  They report their experiment's uncertainties +-0.0019+-0.0018+-0.0008, where the first error is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is the uncertainty in the lifetimes. We combine the last two in quadrature.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
Obtained from a 2D fit to the combined B --> Dbar lepton+ nu_lepton sample with a  model-independent parametrization according to Boyd-Grinstein-Lebed (BGL), in which a hadronic  decay of the second B meson is fully reconstructed.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
Obtained from a fit to the combined partially reconstructed B --> Dbar lepton nu_lepton sample while tagged by the other fully reconstructed B meson in the event. Also reports fitted rho**2 = 1.09+-0.05.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
Obtained from a fit to the combined B --> Dbar lepton+ nu_lepton sample in which a hadronic decay of the second B meson is fully reconstructed and rho**2 = 1.20+-0.09+-0.04.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
Obtained from a global fit to B --> D^(*)() lepton nu_lepton events, with reconstructed D0 lepton and D+ lepton final states and rho**2 = 1.20+-0.04+-0.07.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
BARTELT 1999: measured using both exclusive reconstructed B0 --> D- lepton+ nu and B+ --> D0 lepton+ nu samples.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
BUSKULIC 1997: measured using exclusively reconstructed D+- with a a**2=-0.05+-0.53+-0.38. The statistical correlation is 0.99.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
Using the missing energy and momentum to extract kinematic information about the undetected neutrino in the B0 --> D- lepton+ nu decay.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
ATHANAS 1997: measured using both exclusive reconstructed B0 --> D- lepton+ nu and B+ --> D0 lepton+ nu samples with a rho**2=0.59+-0.22+-0.12(-0)**+0.59. They report their experiment's uncertainties +-0.0044+-0.0048+0.0053-0.0012, where the first error is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is the uncertainty due to the form factor model variations.  We combine the last two in quadrature.


pdgid: S052A00
text:
Measured from an inclusive sample of D_s()- mu+ candidates using CNL parameterization of the  form factor. AAIJ 2020E provides also measurement of |V(cb)| = 42.3+-0.8+-0.9+-1.2E-3  using BGL parameterization of the form factor. The third uncertainty is due to the external inputs  used in the measurement.


pdgid: S085DM
text:
LEE-FRANZINI 1990 value is for an admixture of B0 and B+. They measure 46.7+-0.4+-0.2 MeV for an admixture of B0, B+, and B_{{s}}, and  use the shape of the photon line to separate the above value.


pdgid: M244DM+
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{1}}()+)-mass(B0)] - (mass(B^*()0)-mass(B0)) -   mass(pi+) = 260.9+-1.8+-3.1 MeV which we adjust by the pi+ mass and assume (mass(B^*()0)-mass(B0)) =   (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) = 45.01+-0.30+-0.23 MeV. The masses inside the square brackets  were  measured for each candidate event.


pdgid: M244DM+
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{1}}(5721)+) - mass(B^*()0) - mass(pi+) = 262+-3+1-3 MeV which we adjusted by the pi+ mass.


pdgid: M244DM1
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{1}}()0)-mass(B+)] - (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) -  mass(pi-) = 263.9+-0.7+-1.4 MeV which we adjust by the pi- mass and (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) =  45.01+-0.30+-0.23 MeV. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event.


pdgid: M244DM1
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{1}}(5721)0) - mass(B^*()+) - mass(pi-) = 262.7+-0.9+1.1-1.2 MeV which we adjusted by the pi- mass.


pdgid: M151M
text:
AFFOLDER 2001F uses the reconstructed Bmeson through semileptonic decay channels.  The fraction of light Bmesons that are produced at L=1 B^{**} states is measured to be 0.28+-0.06+-0.03.


pdgid: M151M
text:
BARATE 1998L uses fully reconstructed B mesons to search for B**** production in the B pi+- system. In the framework of heavy quark symmetry (HQS), they also measured the mass of B_{{2}}^* to be 5739+8-11+6-4 MeV/c**2 and the relative production rate of B(b --> B_2^* --> B^(*) pi)/B(b --> B_u,d) = (31+-9+6-5)%.


pdgid: M151M
text:
ACCIARRI 1999N uses inclusive reconstructed B mesons to search for B**** production in the B**(*)pi+- system. In the framework of HQET, they measured the mass of B^*_1 and B^*_2 to be 5670+-10+-13MeV and 5768+-5+-6 with the B(b --> B^**)= 32+-3+-6E-2.  They also reported the evidence for the existence of an excited B-meson state or mixture of states in the region 5.9 -- 6.0 GeV.


pdgid: M245DM+
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{2}}^*()+)-mass(B0)] - mass(pi+) = 318.1+-0.7+-0.4  MeV which we adjust by the pi+ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for  each candidate event.


pdgid: M245DM+
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{2}}^*(5747)+) - mass(B0) - mass(pi+) = 317.7+-1.2+0.3-0.9 MeV which we adjusted by the pi+ mass.


pdgid: M245DM2
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{2}}^*()0)-mass(B+)] - mass(pi-) = 320.6+-0.4+-0.3  MeV which we adjust by the pi- mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for  each candidate event.


pdgid: M245DM2
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{2}}^*(5747)0) - mass(B+) - mass(pi-) = 317.9+-1.2+0.8-0.9 MeV which we adjusted by the pi- mass.


pdgid: M245R03
text:
Converted from measured ratio of R = B(B_2^*()0 --> B^*()+ pi-) / B(B_2^*()0 --> B^(*)()+ pi-)  = 0.475+-0.095+-0.069.


pdgid: M246DM+
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()+)-mass(B0)] - mass(pi+) = 431+-13+-14 MeV  which we adjust by the pi+ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each  candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses two relativistic  Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M246DM+
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()+)-mass(B0)] - mass(pi+) = 455+-26+-14 MeV  which we adjust by the pi+ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each  candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses three relativistic  Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M246DM1
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()+)-mass(B0)] - (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) -  mass(pi+) = 425+-15+-14 MeV which we adjust by the pi+ mass. The masses inside the  square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes P =  -(-1)**J, (mass(B^*()0)-mass(B0)) = (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) = 45.01+-0.30+-0.23  MeV, and uses three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M246DM0
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()0)-mass(B+)] - mass(pi-) = 444+-5+-7 MeV   which we adjust by the pi- mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each   candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses two relativistic   Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M246DM0
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()0)-mass(B+)] - mass(pi-) = 471+-22+-7 MeV  which we adjust by the pi- mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each  candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses three relativistic  Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M246DM2
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()0)-mass(B+)] - (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) -  mass(pi-) = 444+-5+-7 MeV which we adjust by the pi- mass. The masses inside the square  brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes P =  -(-1)**J, (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) = 45.01+-0.30+-0.23 MeV, and uses three  relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M246W+
text:
Assuming P = (-1)**J and using two relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit  for mass difference.


pdgid: M246W+
text:
Assuming P = (-1)**J and using three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the  fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M246W+
text:
Assuming P = -(-1)**J and using three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in  the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M248DM+
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()+)-mass(B0)] - mass(pi+) = 545.8+-4.1+-2.5   MeV which we adjust by the pi+ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for   each candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses two relativistic   Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M248DM+
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{J}}(5970)+) - mass(B0) - mass(pi+) = 541+-5+-12 MeV which we adjusted by the pi+ mass.


pdgid: M248DM+
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()+)-mass(B0)] - mass(pi+) = 547+-5+-3 MeV  which we adjust by the pi+ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each  candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses three relativistic  Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M248DM1
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()+)-mass(B0)] - (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) -  mass(pi+) = 547+-4+-3 MeV which we adjust by the pi+ mass. The masses inside the square  brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes P =  -(-1)**J, (mass(B^*()0)-mass(B0)) = (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) = 45.01+-0.30+-0.23  MeV, and uses three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit  for mass difference.


pdgid: M248DM0
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()0)-mass(B+)] - mass(pi-) = 550.4+-2.9+-5.1  MeV which we adjust by the pi- mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for  each candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses two relativistic  Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M248DM0
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{J}}(5970)0) - mass(B+) - mass(pi-) = 558+-5+-12 MeV which we adjusted by the pi- mass.


pdgid: M248DM0
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()0)-mass(B+)] - mass(pi-) = 575+-6+-5 MeV  which we adjust by the pi- mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each  candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses three relativistic  Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M248DM2
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()0)-mass(B+)] - (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) -  mass(pi-) = 552+-4+-5 MeV which we adjust by the pi- mass. The masses inside the square  brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes P =  -(-1)**J, (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) = 45.01+-0.30+-0.23 MeV, and uses three  relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: S086M
text:
Uses J/psi --> mu+ mu-, phi --> K+ K- decays, and observes 128+-13 events of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi phi.


pdgid: S086DM
text:
The reported result is mass(B_{{s}}()0)-mass(B0) = 87.45+-0.44+-0.09 MeV. We convert it to the mass difference with respect to the average of (mass(B+-) + mass(B0))/2.


pdgid: S086DM
text:
The reported result is mass(B_{{s}}()0)-mass(B+) = 87.52+-0.30+-0.12 MeV. We convert it to the mass difference with respect to the average of (mass(B+-) + mass(B0))/2.


pdgid: S086DM
text:
The reported result is mass(B^0_s()) - mass(B0) = 86.38+-0.90+-0.06 MeV. We convert it to the mass difference with respect to the average of (mass(B+-) + mass(B0))/2.


pdgid: S086T
text:
AALTONEN 2011AP combines the fully reconstrcuted B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+ decays and partially reconstructed B_s()0 --> D_s X decays.


pdgid: S086T
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1998F use fully reconstructed D_s()- --> phi pi- and D_s()- --> K^*()0 K- in the inclusive B_{{s}}()0 decay.


pdgid: S086T
text:
ABREU 1994E uses the flight-distance distribution of D_{{s}} vertices, phi-lepton vertices, and D_s mu vertices.


pdgid: S086GS
text:
Reports width(s) - width(d) = -0.0056+0.0013-0.0015+-0.0014 ps**-1 using a  time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- decays and the current B0  lifetime of 1.517+-0.004 ps**-1.


pdgid: S086GS
text:
Measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays with J/psi --> e+ e-.


pdgid: S086GS
text:
Measured using time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- in the region m(K K) >  1.05 GeV.


pdgid: S086GS
text:
Reports width(s) - width(d) = -0.0041+-0.0024+-0.0015 ps**-1 using a  time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- decays and the B0 lifetime of  1.520+-0.004 ps**-1. The results are further combined with those coming from B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi-,  B_s()0 --> psi(2S) phi, and B_s()0 --> D_s()+ D_s()-.


pdgid: S086GS
text:
Measured using a combined time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- and B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays.


pdgid: S086DGS
text:
Measured using CP eigenstates B_s()0 --> J/psi eta^' and B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi-  (selected to be predominantly CP-odd). Negligible CP violation and width(B_{{s}}()0) =  0.6628+-0.0035 ps**-1 are assumed.


pdgid: S086DGS
text:
AAIJ 2013AR result comes from a combined fit to B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- and B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- data sets. Also reports DeltaGamma(s) = 0.100+-0.016+-0.003 ps**-1 from a fit to B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- decays.


pdgid: S086DGS
text:
Uses the time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays and assuming CP-violating angle beta_{{s}}(B0 --> J/psi phi) = 0.02.


pdgid: S086DGS
text:
Measured using the time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays and assuming CP-violating phase phi(s) = 0.


pdgid: S086DGS
text:
Combines D0 measurements of time-dependent angular distributions in B_s()0 --> J/psi phi and charge asymmetry in semileptonic decays. There is a 4-fold ambiguity in the solution.


pdgid: S086DRA
text:
ACCIARRI 1998S assumes  tau(B_{{s}}()0)= 1.49+-0.06ps and PDG 1998 values of bproduction fraction.


pdgid: S086TSH
text:
Measured using a pure CP-odd final state J/psi K0S with the assumption that contributions from penguin diagrams are small.


pdgid: S086TSH
text:
Measured using B_s --> mu+ mu- decays which, in the Standard Model, correspond to B_{{sH}}()0   decays. Assumes -2 Re(lambda)/(1 + |lambda|**2) = 1.


pdgid: S086TSH
text:
Measured using B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays with 0.9240 < m(pi pi) < 1.0204  GeV, which is dominated by the f_{{0}}(980) resonance, making it a CP-odd state.


pdgid: S086TSH
text:
Measured using J/psi pi+ pi- mode with 0.880 < m(pi pi) < 1.080  GeV/c**2, which is mostly J/psi f(0)(980) mode, a pure CP-odd final state.


pdgid: S086TSH
text:
Measured using B_s --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays which, in the limit of phi_{{s}} = 0 and  |lambda| = 1, correspond to B_{{sH}}()0 decays.


pdgid: S086TSH
text:
Uses the time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays assuming CP-violating angle beta_{{s}}(B0 --> J/psi phi) = 0.02.


pdgid: S086TSL
text:
AAIJ 2023P reports a tau_{{L}} value combined with AAIJ 2016AL result as tau_{{L}} =  1.452+-0.014+-0.007 ps.


pdgid: S086TSL
text:
Measured using results in SIRUNYAN 2018BY for the heavy B_{{s}}()0 lifetime obtained from  B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays and the average effective B_s()0 --> J/psi phi lifetime,  and magnitude squared of the CP-odd amplitude |A((perp))|**2 = 0.250+-0.006.  The uncertainty includes all statistical and systematic contributions.


pdgid: S086TSL
text:
Measured using B_s()0 --> D_s()- D_s()+. The effective lifetime is translated into a decay width of Gamma(L) = 0.725+-0.014+-0.009 ps**-1.


pdgid: S086TFS
text:
AAIJ 2017AN value was measured using B_s()0 --> D_s^(*)()- mu+ nu_mu decays relative to  B0 --> D^(*)()- mu+ nu_mu decays.


pdgid: S086TJF
text:
Based on DeltaGamma = Gamma(H) - Gamma(B0) =  -0.05+-0.004+-0.004 ps**-1 and meanlife(B0) = 1.517+-0.004 ps. The first error is  due to the combined DeltaGamma uncertainty and the second is from meanlife(B0)  uncertainty.


pdgid: S086TMM
text:
Measured using B_s --> mu+ mu- decays which, in the Standard Model, correspond to B_{{sH}}()0  decays. Assumes -2 Re(lambda)/(1 + |lambda|**2) = 1.


pdgid: S086R5
text:
WANG 2022 selects the B_{{s}} events by tagging the accompanying B_{{s}} via partial  reconstruction of the semileptonic decays B_s --> D_s X lepton+ nu.


pdgid: S086R5
text:
The extraction of this result takes into account the correlation between the measurements of B(Upsilon(5S) --> D_s X) and B(Upsilon(5S) --> D0 X).


pdgid: S086R5
text:
BUSKULIC 1996E separate c cbar and b bbar sources of D_{{s}}()+ mesons using a lifetime tag, subtract generic bbar --> W+ --> D_s()+ events, and obtain B(bbar --> B_s()0) * B(B_s()0 --> D_s()- anything) = 0.088+-0.020+-0.020 assuming B(D_s --> phi pi) = 3.5+-0.4E-2 and PDG 1994 values for the relative partial widths to other D_{{s}} channels. We evaluate using our current values B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 0.107+-0.014 and B(D_s --> phi pi) = 0.036+-0.009.  Our first error is their experiment's and our second error is that due to B(bbar --> B_s()0) and B(D_s --> phi pi).


pdgid: S086R5
text:
ACTON 1992N assume that excess of 147+-48 D_{{s}}()0 events over that expected from B0, B+, and c cbar is all from B_{{s}}()0 decay.  The product branching fraction is measured to be B(bbar --> B_s()0)B(B_s()0 --> D_s()- anything)xB(D_s()- --> phi pi-) = 5.9+-1.9+-1.1E-3.


pdgid: S086R54
text:
The measurement corresponds to a branching fraction where the lepton originates from bottom decay and is the average between the electron and muon branching fractions. LEES 2012A uses the correlation of the production of phi mesons in association with a lepton in e+ e- data taken at center-of-mass energies between 10.54 and 11.2 GeV.


pdgid: S086R2
text:
Obtains B_s --> D_s X e nu, and D_s X mu nu separately, then combines them by assuming   systematic uncertainties are fully correlated, except for the one on lepton identification. The   third uncertainty adds in quadrature systematic uncertainties from external sources (number of   B_{{s}} events, and D_{{s}}^(*)() branching fractions). OSWALD 2015 also measures the   cross-section CS(e+ e- --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = 53.8+-1.4+-5.3 pb at sqrt(s) =  10.86  GeV.


pdgid: S086R2
text:
BUSKULIC 1995O use D_s lepton correlations. The measured product branching ratio is B(bbar --> B_s) * B(B_s --> D_s()- lepton+ nu_lepton anything) = (0.82+-0.09+0.13-0.14)% assuming B(D_s --> phi pi) = 3.5+-0.4E-2 and PDG 1994 values for the relative partial widths to the six other D_{{s}} channels used in this analysis. Combined with results from Upsilon(4S) experiments this can be used to extract B(bbar --> B_s) = (11.0+-1.2+2.5-2.6)%. We evaluate using our current values B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 0.107+-0.014 and B(D_s --> phi pi) = 0.036+-0.009.  Our first error is their experiment's and our second error is that due to B(bbar --> B_s()0) and B(D_s --> phi pi).


pdgid: S086R2
text:
We evaluate using our current values B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 0.107+-0.014 and B(D_s --> phi pi) = 0.036+-0.009.  Our first error is their experiment's and our second error is that due to B(bbar --> B_s()0) and B(D_s --> phi pi). We use B(Z --> b  or  bbar) = 2B(Z --> b bbar) = 2*(0.2212+-0.0019).


pdgid: S086R2
text:
ACTON 1992N is measured using D_s --> phi pi+ and K^*(892)0 K+ events. The product branching fraction measured is measured to be B(bbar --> B_s()0)B(B_s()0 --> D_s()- lepton+ nu_lepton anything) xB(D_s^- --> phi pi-) = 3.9+-1.1+-0.8E-4.


pdgid: S086R2
text:
BUSKULIC 1992E is measured using D_s --> phi pi+ and K^*(892)0 K+ events.  They use 2.7+-0.7% for the phi pi+ branching fraction. The average product branching fraction is measured to be B(bbar --> B_s()0)B(B_s()0 --> D_s()- lepton+ nu_lepton anything) =0.020+-0.0055+0.005-0.006.


pdgid: S086S04
text:
Obtains B_s --> D_s^*() X e nu, and D_s^*() X mu nu separately, then combines them by  assuming systematic uncertainties are fully correlated, except for the one on lepton  identification. The third uncertainty adds in quadrature systematic uncertainties from external  sources (number of B_{{s}} events, and D_{{s}}^(*)() branching fractions). OSWALD 2015 also  measures the cross-section CS(e+ e- --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = 53.8+-1.4+-5.3 pb at  sqrt(s) = 10.86 GeV.


pdgid: S086P49
text:
AAIJ 2020E  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()- mu+ nu_mu)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton)] = 1.09+-0.05+-0.06+-0.05 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.10+-0.07E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P50
text:
AAIJ 2020E  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s^*()- mu+ nu_mu)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- lepton+ nu_lepton)] = 1.06+-0.05+-0.07+-0.05 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- lepton+ nu_lepton) = 4.87+-0.09E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R36
text:
ABAZOV 2009G  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s1(2536)- mu+ nu_mu  ,  D_s1()- --> D^*()- K0S)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> B_s()0)] = 2.66+-0.52+-0.45E-4 which we divide by our best value B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 10.0+-0.8E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P54
text:
AAIJ 2021G measures B(B_s()0 --> K- mu+ nu_mu )/B( B_s()0 --> D_s()- mu+ nu_mu  )  = 4.89+-0.21+0.20-0.21+-0.14E-3 over the whole q**2 range, where the last uncertainty  is due to the D_s()- --> K+ K- pi- branching fraction.


pdgid: S086P54
text:
AAIJ 2021G reports this branching ratio for q**2 < 7 GeV**2 as 1.66+-0.08+-0.07+-0.05E-3  and for q**2 > 7 GeV**2 as 3.25+-0.21+0.16-0.17+-0.09E-3.


pdgid: S086P55
text:
The total systematic error includes D_{{s}}()- branching fractions, B_{{s}}()0 lifetime,  |V(cb)|,  and B_s()0 --> D_s()- form factor integral uncertainties.


pdgid: S086R3
text:
AAIJ 2021Y  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- pi+)] = 1.18+-0.04 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.51+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R3
text:
LOUVOT 2009   reports 3.67+0.35-0.33+0.65-0.645E-3 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)())] assuming B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = 19.5+-2.6E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = 20.1+-3.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R3
text:
ABULENCIA 2007C  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- pi+)] = 1.13+-0.08+-0.23 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.51+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R3
text:
AAIJ 2012AG reports 2.95+-0.05+-0.17+0.18-0.22E-3 where the last uncertainty comes from the semileptonic f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} measurement. We combined the systematics in quadrature.


pdgid: S086R3
text:
ABULENCIA 2006J  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- pi+)] = 1.32+-0.18+-0.38 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.51+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R3
text:
AKERS 1994J sees <=6 events and measures the limit on the product branching fraction f(bbar --> B_s()0).B(B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+) < 1.3% at CL = 90%. We divide by our current value B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 0.105.


pdgid: S086R30
text:
ABULENCIA 2007C  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- pi+ pi+ pi-)] = 1.05+-0.10+-0.22 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- pi+ pi+ pi-) = 6.0+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R35
text:
LOUVOT 2009   reports 2.4+1.2-1.0+-0.42E-4 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()-+ K+-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)())] assuming B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = 19.5+-2.6E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = 20.1+-3.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P77
text:
AAIJ 2023AY reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s1(2536)-+ K+-  ,  D_s1()- --> Dbar^*(2007)0 K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-)] = 0.409+-0.019+-0.022 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-) = 6.1+-0.5E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R32
text:
Use Upsilon(5S) --> B_s^*() Bbar_s^*() decays assuming B(Upsilon(5S) --> B_s^*() Bbar_s^*()) = (17.1+-3.0)% and Gamma(Upsilon(5S) --> B_s^*() Bbar_s^*()) / Gamma(Upsilon(5S) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = (87.0+-1.7)%.


pdgid: S086R32
text:
AALTONEN 2012C reports (f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}) (B(B_s()0 --> D_s()+ D_s()-) / B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)) = 0.183+-0.021+-0.017. We multiply this result by our best value of B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) =  and divide by our best value of f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}, where 1/2 f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = . Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best values.


pdgid: S086R32
text:
AALTONEN 2012C  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()+ D_s()-)/G(total)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/[G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)]] / [B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)] = 0.0915+-0.0105+-0.0085 which we multiply or divide by our best values [G(bbar --> B_s()0)]G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.1230+-0.0115, B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = 8.1+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R32
text:
Uses Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^*() Bbar_s^*() assuming B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = (19.3+-2.9)% and Gamma(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^*() Bbar_s^*()) / Gamma(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = (90.1+3.8-4.0)%.


pdgid: S086R32
text:
AALTONEN 2008F  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()+ D_s()-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)] = 1.44+0.48-0.44 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = 8.1+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R73
text:
AAIJ 2014AA reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()- D+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)] = 0.038+-0.004+-0.003 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = 8.1+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P74
text:
AAIJ 2023J  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D^*()+ D^*()-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D^*(2010)+ D^*(2010)-)] = 0.269+-0.032+-0.011+-0.008 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D^*(2010)+ D^*(2010)-) = 8.0+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R33
text:
AAIJ 2016P  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s^*()+ D_s()- + D_s^*()- D_s()+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)] = 1.88+-0.08+-0.12 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = 8.1+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R33
text:
AALTONEN 2012C reports (f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}) (B(B_s()0 --> D_s^*()+ D_s()- + D_s^*()- D_s()+) / B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)) = 0.424+-0.046+-0.035. We multiply this result by our best value of B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) =  and divide by our best value of f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}, where 1/2 f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = . Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best values.


pdgid: S086R33
text:
AALTONEN 2012C  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s^*()+ D_s()- + D_s^*()- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/[G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)]] / [B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)] = 0.212+-0.023+-0.0175 which we multiply or divide by our best values [G(bbar --> B_s()0)]G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.1230+-0.0115, B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = 8.1+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R34
text:
AAIJ 2016P  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s^*()+ D_s^*()-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)] = 1.76+-0.11+-0.14 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = 8.1+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R34
text:
AALTONEN 2012C reports (f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}) (B(B_s()0 --> D_s^*()+ D_s^*()-) / B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)) = 0.654+-0.072+-0.065. We multiply this result by our best value of B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) =  and divide by our best value of f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}, where 1/2 f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = . Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best values.


pdgid: S086R34
text:
AALTONEN 2012C  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s^*()+ D_s^*()-)/G(total)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/[G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)]] / [B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)] = 0.327+-0.036+-0.0325 which we multiply or divide by our best values [G(bbar --> B_s()0)]G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.1230+-0.0115, B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = 8.1+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R23
text:
AAIJ 2016P  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s^(*)()+ D_s^(*)()-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)] = 4.24+-0.14+-0.27 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = 8.1+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R23
text:
AALTONEN 2012C reports (f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}) (B(B_s()0 --> D_s^(*)()+ D_s^(*)()-) / B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)) = 1.261+-0.095+-0.112. We multiply this result by our best value of B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) =  and divide by our best value of f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}, where 1/2 f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = . Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best values.


pdgid: S086R23
text:
AALTONEN 2012C  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s^(*)()+ D_s^(*)()-)/G(total)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/[G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)]] / [B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)] = 0.6305+-0.0475+-0.056 which we multiply or divide by our best values [G(bbar --> B_s()0)]G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.1230+-0.0115, B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = 8.1+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R23
text:
Reports B(B_s()0(short) --> D_s^(*)() D_s^(*)()) = (0.23+-0.10+-0.05) . [0.17/B(D_s --> phi chi)]**2 assuming B(B_s()0 --> B_s()0(short)) = 50%. We use our best value of B(D_s --> phi chi) = 15.7+-1.0% to obtain the quoted result.


pdgid: S086P60
text:
AAIJ 2021S  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D^*()- D_s()+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)] = 0.049+-0.006+-0.0036 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+) = 8.2+-0.8E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P57
text:
AAIJ 2021N  reports [[G(B_s()0 --> D^*()+ D-)/G(total)+ G(B_s()0 --> D^*()- D+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D+- D^*()-+  (CP-averaged))] = 0.137+-0.017+-0.006 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D+- D^*()-+  (CP-averaged)) = 6.1+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P20
text:
Measured and normalized to the B_s()0 --> Dbar^*()0 K0S decay with f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.259+-0.015.  Signal significance is 4.4 standard deviations.


pdgid: S086R65
text:
AAIJ 2013AQ reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar0 K- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-)] = 1.18+-0.05+-0.12 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-) = 8.8+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P62
text:
AAIJ 2022N  reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar^*(2007)0 K- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+ pi-)] = 1.178+-0.029+-0.091+-0.037 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+ pi-) = 6.2+-2.2E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R52
text:
AAIJ 2011D  reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar0 Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 rho0)] = 1.48+-0.34+-0.19 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 rho0) = 3.21+-0.21E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R52
text:
AAIJ 2013BX reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar0 Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K^*(892)0)] = 7.8+-0.7+-0.3+-0.6 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K^*(892)0) = 4.5+-0.6E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R85
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B_s()0 --> Dbar0 K- pi+ decays. Corresponds to the resonant K_0^*(1430) part of LASS parametrization.


pdgid: S086R91
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B_s()0 --> Dbar0 K- pi+ decays. Corresponds to the non-resonant part of the LASS parametrization.


pdgid: S086R03
text:
AAIJ 2018AZ reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-)] = 0.930+-0.089+-0.069 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-) = 6.1+-0.5E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R03
text:
AAIJ 2012AM reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-)] = 0.90+-0.27+-0.20 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-) = 6.1+-0.5E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P39
text:
AAIJ 2023AZ result's last uncertainty includes the uncertainty of the branching fraction of  B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-) and of f(s)/f(d) ratio.


pdgid: S086P39
text:
AAIJ 2018AY reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar0 phi)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-)] = 3.4+-0.4+-0.3E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-) = 8.8+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P38
text:
AAIJ 2023AZ result's last uncertainty includes the uncertainties of the branching fraction of  B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-) and of f(s)/f(d) ratio.


pdgid: S086P38
text:
AAIJ 2018AY reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar^*()0 phi)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-)] = 4.2+-0.5+-0.4E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-) = 8.8+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P28
text:
The last uncertainty includes the limited knowledge of the external branching fractions where the  eta_{{c}} is reconstructed in the p pbar,K+ K- pi+ pi-, pi+ pi- pi+ pi-, and K+ K- K+ K-  decays and phi(1020) --> K+ K-.


pdgid: S086P29
text:
The last uncertainty includes the limited knowledge of the external branching fractions where the  eta_{{c}} is reconstructed in the p pbar,K+ K- pi+ pi-, pi+ pi- pi+ pi-, and K+ K- K+ K-  decays. The significance of the signal, including systematic uncertainties, is 4.6 standard  deviations.


pdgid: S086R6
text:
AAIJ 2021Y  reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 5.01+-0.16+-0.17E-4 from a measurement of [[G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] assuming B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.003+-0.035E-3, which we rescale to our best values B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2, B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R6
text:
THORNE 2013 uses f(s) = (17.2+-3.0)% as the fraction of Upsilon(5S) decaying to B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)().


pdgid: S086R6
text:
ABE 1996Q  reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)/G(total)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/[G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)]] = 0.185+-0.055+-0.020E-3 which we divide by our best value [G(bbar --> B_s()0)]G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.1230+-0.0115. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R6
text:
AKERS 1994J sees one event and measures the limit on the product branching fraction f(bbar --> B_s()0).B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi) < 7E-4 at CL = 90%. We divide by  B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 0.112.


pdgid: S086R6
text:
In ACTON 1992N a limit on the product branching fraction is measured to be  f(bbar --> B_s()0).B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi) <=0.22E-2.


pdgid: S086R19
text:
KUMAR 2024 uses f(s) = (22.0+2.0-2.1)% as the fraction of Upsilon(5S)  decaying to B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)().


pdgid: S086R20
text:
AAIJ 2013A  reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) eta)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) rho()0)] = 14.0+-1.2+1.1-1.5+1.1-1.0 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) rho()0) = 2.55+0.18-0.16E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R20
text:
Observed for the first time with significances over 10 sigma. The second error are total systematic uncertainties including the error on N(B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()).


pdgid: S086R46
text:
AAIJ 2015AL reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S)] = 4.31+-0.17+-0.12+-0.25E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S) = 4.45+-0.11E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R46
text:
AALTONEN 2011A  reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> B_s()0)] / [B(bbar --> B0)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0)] = 0.545+-0.095+-0.055E-2 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 10.0+-0.8E-2, B(bbar --> B0) = 40.8+-0.7E-2, B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0) = 8.91+-0.21E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R46
text:
AALTONEN 2011A reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> B_s()0)] /  [B(bbar --> B0)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S)] = 1.09+-0.19+-0.11E-2 which we multiply or divide by our best  values B(bbar --> B_s()0) = , B(bbar --> B0) = , B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S) = 1/2 * B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0) = 1/2 * . Our firs t error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from  using our best values.


pdgid: S086R46
text:
AAIJ 2013AB reports 1.97+-0.14+-0.07+-0.15+-0.08E-5 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/G(bbar --> B0)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0) = 8.98+-0.35E-4,[G(bbar --> B_s()0)G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.256+-0.020, which we rescale to our best values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0) = 8.91+-0.21E-4, [G(bbar --> B_s()0)]G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.246+-0.023. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R46
text:
AAIJ 2012O  reports 1.83+-0.21+-0.10+-0.14+-0.07E-5 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/G(bbar --> B0)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0) = 8.71+-0.32E-4,[G(bbar --> B_s()0)G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.267+0.021-0.02, which we rescale to our best values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0) = 8.91+-0.21E-4, [G(bbar --> B_s()0)]G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.246+-0.023. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R47
text:
AAIJ 2015AV result combines two measurements with different normalizing modes of B0 --> J/psi K^*(892)0 and   B_s()0 --> J/psi phi.


pdgid: S086R47
text:
AAIJ 2012AP reports B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) Kbar^*(892)0)/B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 3.43+0.34-0.36+-0.50E-2 and B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.29+-0.05+-0.13E-3 after correcting for the contribution from K pi S-wave beneath the K^*() peak.


pdgid: S086R47
text:
AALTONEN 2011A  reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> B_s()0)] / [B(bbar --> B0)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] = 0.0168+-0.0024+-0.0068 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 10.0+-0.8E-2, B(bbar --> B0) = 40.8+-0.7E-2, B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R01
text:
AAIJ 2013A  reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) eta^')/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) rho()0)] = 12.7+-1.1+0.5-1.3+1.0-0.9 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) rho()0) = 2.55+0.18-0.16E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R02
text:
Strongly correlated with measurements of Gamma()/Gamma  and Gamma()/Gamma  reported in the same reference.


pdgid: S086R04
text:
AAIJ 2012AO reports 19.79+-0.47+-0.52E-2 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] assuming B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 48.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R44
text:
The second error includes both the detector systematic and the uncertainty in the number of produced Y(5S) --> B_s^(*)()  Bbar_s^(*)() pairs.


pdgid: S086R53
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2016Q  reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_0(980)  ,  f_0() --> pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.140+-0.008+-0.023 which we multiply by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R53
text:
AAIJ 2012AO reports 13.9+-0.6+2.5-1.2E-2 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_0(980)  ,  f_0() --> pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] assuming B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 48.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R53
text:
ABAZOV 2012C  reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_0(980)  ,  f_0() --> pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.275+-0.041+-0.061 which we multiply by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R53
text:
AALTONEN 2011AB reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_0(980)  ,  f_0() --> pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.257+-0.020+-0.014 which we multiply by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R53
text:
AAIJ 2011   reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_0(980)  ,  f_0() --> pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.252+0.046-0.032+0.027-0.033 which we multiply by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R05
text:
Measured in Dalitz plot like analysis of B_s --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays for the f_{{2}} helicity state lambda = 0.


pdgid: S086R05
text:
AAIJ 2012AO reports 0.098+-0.033+0.006-0.015E-2 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_2(1270)  ,  f_2() --> pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] assuming B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 48.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R07
text:
AAIJ 2012AO reports 4.19+-0.53+0.12-3.7E-2 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_0(1370)  ,  f_0() --> pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] assuming B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 48.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R06
text:
AAIJ 2012AO reports 1.66+-0.31+0.96-0.08E-2 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-  (nonresonant))/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] assuming B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 48.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R82
text:
Measured with B(B_s()0 --> J/psi K0S pi+ pi-) / B(B0 --> J/psi K0S pi+ pi-) using PDG 2012 values for the involved branching fractions.


pdgid: S086R80
text:
AAIJ 2014L  reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) K0 K- pi+ + c.c.)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0 pi+ pi-)] = 2.12+-0.15+-0.18 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.5+-0.4E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R81
text:
Measured with B(B_s()0 --> J/psi K0S K+ K-)/B(B0 --> J/psi K0S pi+ pi-) using PDG 2012 values for the involved branching fractions.


pdgid: S086R09
text:
ABAZOV 2012AF reports [Gamma(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_2^'(1525))/Gamma(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] x B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) / B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 0.19+-0.05+-0.04 which we divide and multiply by our best values B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) = 1/2, B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R09
text:
ABAZOV 2012AF reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_2^'(1525))/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] * [B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.38+-0.10+-0.08 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8+-2.2E-2, B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R09
text:
AAIJ 2012S reports [26.4+-2.7+-2.4E-2 from a measurement of Gamma(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_2^'(1525))/Gamma(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] x B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) / B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) assuming B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) = 44.4+-1.1E-2, B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 48.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best values B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) = 1/2, B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R09
text:
AAIJ 2012S  reports 26.4+-2.7+-2.4E-2 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_2^'(1525))/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] * [B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] assuming B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8+-2.2E-2,B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 48.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best values B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8+-2.2E-2, B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R60
text:
Measured relative to B_s()0 --> J/psi phi assuming B( B_s()0 --> J/psi phi) = 10.5+-0.13+-0.64E-4 and  taking into account small K+ K- S-wave contribution.


pdgid: S086R00
text:
Branching fractions of normalization modes B_s()0 --> J/psi gamma X taken from PDG 2014.  Uses f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.259+-0.015.


pdgid: S086R79
text:
AAIJ 2014Y  reports 7.14+-0.99+0.83-0.91+-0.41E-5 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_1(1285))/G(total)] * [B(f_1(1285) --> 2pi+ 2pi-)] assuming B(f_1(1285) --> 2pi+ 2pi-) = 0.11+0.007-0.006, which we rescale to our best value B(f_1(1285) --> 2pi+ 2pi-) = 10.9+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R37
text:
AAIJ 2012L  reports 0.489+-0.026+-0.021+-0.012 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) phi)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] / [B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.94+-0.06E-2,B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.72+-0.17E-3, which we rescale to our best values B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2, B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.94+-0.22E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P63
text:
TUMASYAN 2022AI reports [G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) K0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> psi(2S) K0)] = 3.33+-0.69+-0.11+-0.34E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> psi(2S) K0) = 5.8+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086S02
text:
AAIJ 2015U  reports [G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) K- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> psi(2S) K+ pi-)] = 5.38+-0.36+-0.22+-0.31E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> psi(2S) K+ pi-) = 5.8+-0.4E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086S03
text:
AAIJ 2015U  reports [G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> psi(2S) K^*(892)0)] = 5.58+-0.57+-0.40+-0.32E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> psi(2S) K^*(892)0) = 5.9+-0.4E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P52
text:
AAIJ 2021C  reports [G(B_s()0 --> chi_c1(3872) phi)/G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) phi)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] / [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] = 2.42+-0.23+-0.07E-2 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.69+-0.34E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P52
text:
SIRUNYAN 2020BB reports [G(B_s()0 --> chi_c1(3872) phi)/G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) phi)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] / [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] = 2.21+-0.29+-0.17E-2 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.69+-0.34E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P70
text:
AAIJ 2023AP reports [G(B_s()0 --> chi_c1(3872) pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) pi+ pi-)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] / [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] = 6.8+-1.1+-0.2E-2 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.69+-0.34E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P59
text:
AAIJ 2021C reports G(B_s()0 --> J/psi K^*(892)0 Kbar^*(892)0)/G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) phi) B**2(K^*()0 --> K+ pi-)/B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-)/B(phi --> K+ K-)  = 1.22+-0.03+-0.04 which we adjust with PDG 2020 values of B(K^*()0 --> K+ pi-) =  99.902+-0.009E-2, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = 34.68+-0.30E-2, and B(phi --> K+ K-)  = 49.2+-0.5E-2. The first uncertainty is the total experiment's one and the second is due to  the adjustment branching fractions.


pdgid: S086P58
text:
AAIJ 2021C  reports [G(B_s()0 --> chi_c1(3872) ( K+ K- ) _non-phi)/G(B_s()0 --> chi_c1(3872) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 1.57+-0.32+-0.12 which we multiply by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R15
text:
AAIJ 2017G  reports [G(B_s()0 --> pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K+ pi-)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/G(bbar --> B0)] = 9.15+-0.71+-0.83E-3 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.00+-0.04E-5, [G(bbar --> B_s()0)G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.246+-0.023. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R15
text:
AALTONEN 2012L  reports [G(B_s()0 --> pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K+ pi-)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.008+-0.002+-0.001 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.00+-0.04E-5, [G(bbar --> B_s()0)G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.246+-0.023. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R15
text:
AAIJ 2012AR reports [G(B_s()0 --> pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> pi+ pi-)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.050+0.011-0.009+-0.004 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B0 --> pi+ pi-) = 5.37+-0.20E-6, [G(bbar --> B_s()0)G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.246+-0.023. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R15
text:
Uses Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^*() Bbar_s^*() and assumes B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = (19.3+-2.9)% and Gamma(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^*() Bbar_s^*()) / Gamma(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = (90.1+3.8-4.0)%.


pdgid: S086R15
text:
Obtains this result from (f_s/f_d) . B(B_s --> pi+ pi-)/B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 0.007+-0.004+-0.005, assuming f_s/f_d = 0.276+-0.034 and B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.4+-0.6E-6.


pdgid: S086R15
text:
ABULENCIA,A 2006D obtains this from B(B_s --> pi+ pi- ) / B(B_s --> K+ K-) < 0.05 at 90% CL, assuming B(B_s --> K+ K-) = 33+-6+-7E-6.


pdgid: S086P66
text:
Uses Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)() decays and assumes B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)())  =     (20.1+-3.1)%.


pdgid: S086P53
text:
Uses Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^* Bbar_s^* decays and assumes B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)())  =  (20.1+-3.1)%.


pdgid: S086S05
text:
AAIJ 2015O  reports [G(B_s()0 --> eta^' eta^')/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> eta^' K+)] = 0.47+-0.09+-0.04 which we multiply by our best value B(B+ --> eta^' K+) = 7.04+-0.25E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P26
text:
Corresponds to the 95% CL upper limit 1.01E-6. Uses the normalization mode B+ --> eta^' K+  with branching fraction 70.6+-2.5E-6 and the ratio of hadronisation fractions  f(s)/f(d) =0.259+-0.015, which is assumed equal to f(s)/f(u).


pdgid: S086R29
text:
AAIJ 2015AS reports [G(B_s()0 --> phi phi)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 phi)] = 1.84+-0.05+-0.13 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 phi) = 1.00+-0.05E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R29
text:
Uses B(B0 --> J/psi phi) = 1.38+-0.49E-3 and production cross-section ratio of CS(B_{{s}})/CS(B0) = 0.26+-0.04.


pdgid: S086R7
text:
AAIJ 2012AR reports [G(B_s()0 --> pi+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K+ pi-)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.074+-0.006+-0.006 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.00+-0.04E-5, [G(bbar --> B_s()0)G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.246+-0.023. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R7
text:
AALTONEN 2009C  reports [G(B_s()0 --> pi+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K+ pi-)] * [B(bbar --> B_s()0)] / [B(bbar --> B0)] = 0.071+-0.010+-0.007 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.00+-0.04E-5, B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 10.0+-0.8E-2, B(bbar --> B0) = 40.8+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R7
text:
ABULENCIA,A 2006D obtains this from (f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}) (B(B_s --> pi+ K- ) / B(B0 --> K+ pi-)) < 0.08 at 90% CL, assuming f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.260+-0.039 and  B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 18.9+-0.7E-6.


pdgid: S086R8
text:
AAIJ 2012AR reports [G(B_s()0 --> K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K+ pi-)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.316+-0.009+-0.019 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.00+-0.04E-5, [G(bbar --> B_s()0)G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.246+-0.023. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R8
text:
AALTONEN 2011N  reports [G(B_s()0 --> K+ K-)/G(total)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/[G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)]] / [B(B0 --> K+ pi-)] = 0.1735+-0.010+-0.0105 which we multiply or divide by our best values [G(bbar --> B_s()0)]G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.1230+-0.0115, B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.00+-0.04E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R8
text:
AALTONEN 2011N reports (f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}) (B(B_s()0 --> K+ K- ) / B(B0 --> K+ pi-)) = 0.347+-0.020+-0.021. We multiply this result by our best value of B(B0 --> K+ pi-) =  and divide by our best value of f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}, where 1/2 f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = . Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best values.


pdgid: S086R8
text:
ABULENCIA,A 2006D obtains this from (f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}) (B(B_s --> K+ K- ) / B(B0 --> K+ pi-)) = 0.46+-0.08+-0.07, assuming f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.260+-0.039 and  B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 18.9+-0.7E-6.


pdgid: S086R39
text:
AAIJ 2020F  reports [G(B_s()0 --> K0 Kbar0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K0 phi)] = 2.3+-0.4+-0.2+-0.1 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K0 phi) = 7.3+-0.7E-6. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R39
text:
Observed in B_s()0 --> K0S K0S with significance of 5.1 sigma. The last uncertainty is  due to the uncertainty of the total number of B_s()0 Bbar_s()0 pairs.


pdgid: S086R61
text:
AAIJ 2017BP reports [G(B_s()0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)] = 0.191+-0.027+-0.033 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.97+-0.18E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R61
text:
AAIJ 2013BP reports [G(B_s()0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)] = 0.29+-0.06+-0.04 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.97+-0.18E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R62
text:
AAIJ 2017BP reports [G(B_s()0 --> K0 K+- pi-+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)] = 1.70+-0.07+-0.15 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.97+-0.18E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R62
text:
AAIJ 2013BP reports [G(B_s()0 --> K0 K+- pi-+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)] = 1.48+-0.12+-0.14 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.97+-0.18E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R96
text:
AAIJ 2014BM reports [G(B_s()0 --> K^*(892)- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K^*(892)+ pi-)] = 0.39+-0.13+-0.05 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K^*(892)+ pi-) = 7.5+-0.4E-6. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R97
text:
AAIJ 2019K reports 18.6+-1.2+-0.8+-4.0+-2.0E-6 as the measured value. We have combined  in quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.


pdgid: S086R97
text:
AAIJ 2014BM reports [G(B_s()0 --> K^*(892)+- K-+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K^*(892)+ pi-)] = 1.49+-0.22+-0.18 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K^*(892)+ pi-) = 7.5+-0.4E-6. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P43
text:
AAIJ 2019K reports 31.3+-2.3+-0.7+-25.1+-3.3E-6 as the measured value. We have  combined in quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.


pdgid: S086P44
text:
AAIJ 2019K reports 10.3+-2.5+-1.1+-16.3+-1.1E-6 as the measured value. We have combined  in quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.


pdgid: S086P45
text:
AAIJ 2019K reports 19.8+-2.8+-1.2+-4.4+-2.1E-6 as the measured value. We have combined in  quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.


pdgid: S086P46
text:
AAIJ 2019K reports 33.0+-2.5+-0.9+-9.1+-3.5E-6 as the measured value. We have combined in  quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.


pdgid: S086P47
text:
AAIJ 2019K reports 16.8+-4.5+-1.7+-21.2+-1.8E-6 as the measured value. We have combined  in quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.


pdgid: S086R63
text:
AAIJ 2017BP also set the limit range 4 -- 25E-7 at 90% CL using the world  average value B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.96+-0.20E-5.


pdgid: S086R63
text:
AAIJ 2017BP reports [G(B_s()0 --> K0 K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)] = 0.026+-0.011+-0.007 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.97+-0.18E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R63
text:
AAIJ 2013BP reports [G(B_s()0 --> K0 K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)] < 0.068 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.97E-5.


pdgid: S086R26
text:
AAIJ 2015AF reports [G(B_s()0 --> Kbar^*(892)0 K^*(892)0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 phi)] = 1.11+-0.22+-0.12+-0.06 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 phi) = 1.00+-0.05E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R26
text:
Uses B0 --> J/psi K^*()0 for normalization and assumes B(B0 --> J/psi K^*()0) B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) B(K^*()0 --> K+ pi-) = 1.33+-0.06E-3 and f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.253+-0.031. The second quoted error is total uncertainty including the error of 0.34 on f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}.


pdgid: S086R28
text:
AAIJ 2013BW reports [G(B_s()0 --> phi K^*(892)0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 phi)] = 0.113+-0.024+-0.016 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 phi) = 1.00+-0.05E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R16
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.6+-0.5E-6 and B production ratio  f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.2539+-0.0079.


pdgid: S086R16
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.6+-0.5E-6 and B production ratio  f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.259+-0.015.


pdgid: S086R16
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.55+-0.54E-6 and B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.256+-0.020.


pdgid: S086P30
text:
AAIJ 2017BD reports [G(B_s()0 --> p pbar K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-)] = 1.67+-0.12+-0.11 which we multiply by our best values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3, B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-) = 99.902+-0.009E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P31
text:
AAIJ 2017BD reports [G(B_s()0 --> p pbar K+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-)] = 0.52+-0.08+-0.05 which we multiply by our best values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3, B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-) = 99.902+-0.009E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P33
text:
Reports B(B_s()0 --> p pbar K+ pi-) / B(B0 --> p pbar K+ pi-) = 0.22+-0.04+-0.02+-0.01, where  the third error is due to f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}.


pdgid: S086P32
text:
AAIJ 2017BD reports [G(B_s()0 --> p pbar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-)] = 0.16+-0.07+-0.02 which we multiply by our best values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3, B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-) = 99.902+-0.009E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P75
text:
AAIJ 2023AD reports 2.3+-1.0+-0.2+-0.1E-8 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> p pbar p pbar)/G(total)] / [B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] assuming B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi) = 1.04+-0.04E-3,B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 0.491+-0.005,B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3, which we rescale to our best values B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi) = 1.03+-0.04E-3, B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P25
text:
AAIJ 2017AL value represents the sum of B_s()0 --> p Lambdabar K- and B_s()0 --> pbar Lambda K+  and assumes the fraction f(s)/f(d) = 0.259+-0.015.


pdgid: S086P25
text:
AAIJ 2017AL reports 5.46+-0.61+-0.82E-6 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> p Lambdabar K- + c.c.)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> p Lambdabar pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> p Lambdabar pi-) = 3.14+-0.29E-6, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> p Lambdabar pi-) = 3.16+-0.24E-6. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R69
text:
The second error is the total systematic uncertainty including the Lambda_{{c}} absolute branching fractions and the normalizion number of B_{{s}} events.


pdgid: S086R17
text:
Assumes the fraction of B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)() in b bbar events is f_{{s}} = (17.2+-3.0)%. The systematic uncertainty from f_{{s}} is 0.6E-5.


pdgid: S086R17
text:
AAIJ 2013   reports [G(B_s()0 --> phi gamma)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 gamma)] = 0.81+-0.04+-0.07 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 gamma) = 4.18+-0.25E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R17
text:
Measures B(B0 --> K^*()0 gamma)/B(B_s --> phi gamma) = 1.12+-0.08(stat)+0.06(sys)+0.09(f_{{s}}/f_{{d}})  and uses current world-average value of B(B0 --> K^*()0 gamma) = 4.33+-0.15E-5.


pdgid: S086P84
text:
AAIJ 2024S reports [Gamma(B_s()0 --> f_2(1270) gamma)/Gamma(B_s()0 --> phi gamma)]  x B(f_2(1270) --> K+ K-) / B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 1.2+0.4-0.3+0.3-0.5% which  we divide and multiply by our best values B(f_2(1270) --> K+ K-) = 1/2,  B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = . Our first error is their experiment's error and our  second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P84
text:
AAIJ 2024S  reports [G(B_s()0 --> f_2(1270) gamma)/G(B_s()0 --> phi gamma)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> K Kbar)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 2.4+0.8-0.6+0.6-1.0 % which we multiply or divide by our best values B(f_2(1270) --> K Kbar) = 4.6+-0.4E-2, B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P85
text:
AAIJ 2024S reports [Gamma(B_s()0 --> f_2^'(1525) gamma)/Gamma(B_s()0 --> phi gamma)]  x B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) / B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 17.3+0.8-0.7+1.3-0.5%  which we divide and multiply by our best values B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) = 1/2,  B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = . Our first error is their experiment's error and our  second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P85
text:
AAIJ 2024S  reports [G(B_s()0 --> f_2^'(1525) gamma)/G(B_s()0 --> phi gamma)] * [B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 34.6+1.6-1.4+2.6-1.0 % which we multiply or divide by our best values B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8+-2.2E-2, B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P86
text:
AAIJ 2024S  reports [G(B_s()0 --> phi(1680) gamma  ,  phi --> K+ K-)/G(B_s()0 --> phi gamma)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 5.4+0.9-0.6+1.0-1.1 % which we multiply by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P87
text:
AAIJ 2024S  reports [G(B_s()0 --> phi_3(1850) gamma  ,  phi_3 --> K+ K-)/G(B_s()0 --> phi gamma)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.4+0.3-0.2+0.2-0.2 % which we multiply by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P88
text:
AAIJ 2024S  reports [G(B_s()0 --> f_2(2010) gamma  ,  f_2 --> K+ K-)/G(B_s()0 --> phi gamma)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.6+0.3-0.2+0.3-0.2 % which we multiply by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3, B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) =  5.961+-0.033E-2 and B production ratio f(b --> B_s()0)/f(b --> B+) = 0.231+-0.008.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.01+-0.03E-3 and B production ratio  f(b --> B_s()0)/f(b --> B+) = 0.252+-0.012+-0.015.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.010+-0.029E-3 and B production ratio   f(b --> B_s()0)/f(b --> B0) = 0.256+-0.013.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
This value corresponds to an upper limit of < 3.0E-9 at 95% C.L. It uses f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.24+-0.02.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Determined from the joint fit to CMS and LHCb data. Uncertainty includes both statistical and systematic component.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.256+-0.020 and two normalization modes:  B(B+ --> J/psi K+--> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.01+-0.21E-5 and B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 1.94+-0.06E-5.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.259+-0.015 and normalization modes B+ --> J/psi K+ --> mu+ mu- K+ and B0 --> K+ pi-.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 10.22+-0.35E-4 and B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.28+-0.04.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B+ --> J/psi K+ --> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.01+-0.21E-5 and B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.263+-0.017.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.256+-0.020 and B(B+ --> J/psi K+ --> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.0+-0.2E-5 for normalization.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B+)/f(bbar --> B_s()0) = 3.75+-0.29 and B(B+ --> J/psi K+ --> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.0+-0.2E-5.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio  f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.267+0.021-0.020 and three normalization modes B(B+ --> J/psi K+--> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.01+-0.21E-5, B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 1.94+-0.06E-5, and B(B_s()0 --> J/psi phi--> mu+ mu- K+ K-) = 3.4+-0.9E-5.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.267+0.021-0.020 and three normalization modes of B+ --> J/psi K+, B0 --> K+ pi-, and B_s()0 --> J/psi phi.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B+)/f(bbar --> B_s()0) = 3.55+-0.47 and B(B+ --> J/psi K+--> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.01+-0.21E-5.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B+)/f(bbar --> B_s()0) = 3.55+-0.42 and B(B+ --> J/psi K+--> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.0+-0.2E-5.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio  f(bbar --> B+)/f(bbar --> B_s()0) = 3.86+-0.59,  and the number of B+ --> J/psi K+ decays.


pdgid: S086P67
text:
The exclusion limit is quoted at 95% CL for the dimuon mass region [3.92 -  mass(B_{{s}}()0)] GeV/c**2. The limits are also reported for other dimuon mass regions:  <4.2E-8 in [2mass(mu) - 1.7] GeV/c**2; <7.7E-8 in [1.70 -- 2.88]  GeV/c**2; <2.8E-8 in [2mass(mu) - 1.7] GeV/c**2 and excluding phi  mass.


pdgid: S086P36
text:
Normalizes to B(B0 --> J/psi K^*()0) = 1.19+-0.01+-0.08% and B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) =  5.96+-0.03%, and uses f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.259+-0.015.


pdgid: S086P16
text:
AAIJ 2015S  reports 8.6+-1.5+-0.7+-0.7E-8 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> pi+ pi- mu+ mu-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.3+-0.1E-3, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R22
text:
AAIJ 2018T uses normalization modes B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.6+-0.5E-6 and B(B+ --> J/psi K+) =  1.026+-0.031E-3 with B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) =  0.259+-0.015. The upper limit increases to 6E-9 with the assumption of B_{{L}}-dominated  decay amplitude.


pdgid: S086R22
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.4+-0.6E-6 and B production ratio  f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.256+-0.020.


pdgid: S086P1
text:
AFFOLDER 2000N measurements are based on 40 B_{{s}}()0 candidates obtained from a data sample of 89pb**-1. The P-wave fraction is found to be 0.23+-0.19+-0.04.


pdgid: S086P06
text:
Note: in the summary of AAIJ 2019AP the systematic uncertainty is 0.007. We take the  systematic uncertainty as given in Table 5 in the paper.


pdgid: S086P07
text:
AAIJ 2014AE reports measurement of phi((perp)) and phi((perp))-phi((parallel)), which we convert into phi((parallel)). Statistical uncertainty includes correlation between measured parameters, while systematic uncertainties are assumed uncorrelated.


pdgid: S086P07
text:
AALTONEN 2011AN quotes cos(phi((parallel))) = -0.91+0.15-0.13+-0.09 which we convert to phi((parallel)) taking the smaller solution.


pdgid: S086P07
text:
AAIJ 2012P quotes cos(phi((parallel))) = -0.844+-0.068+-0.029 which we convert to phi((parallel)), taking the smaller solution.


pdgid: S086P11
text:
Measures cos(phi((parallel))) = -0.18+-0.52+-0.29, which we convert to phi((parallel)) by taking the smaller solution.


pdgid: S086D
text:
Significance of oscillation signal is 5.4 sigma. Also reports |V_td / V_ts| = 0.2060+-0.0007+0.0081-0.0060.


pdgid: S086D
text:
A likelihood scan over the oscillation frequency, Delta(m)(s), gives a most probable value of 19ps**-1 and a range of 17<Delta(m)(s)<21(ps**-1) at 90% C.L. assuming Gaussian uncertainties. Also excludes Delta(m)(s)<14.8ps**-1 at 95% C.L


pdgid: S086D
text:
Significance of oscillation signal is 0.2%. Also reported the value |V_td / V_ts| = 0.208+0.001-0.002+0.008-0.006.


pdgid: S086D
text:
Uses leptons emitted with large momentum transverse to a jet and improved techniques for vertexing and flavor-tagging.


pdgid: S086D
text:
ABE 2003 uses the novel ``charge dipole'' technique to reconstruct separate secondary and tertiary vertices originating from the B --> D decay chain. The analysis excludes Deltamass(s)<4.9ps**-1 and 7.9<Deltamass(s)<10.3ps**-1.


pdgid: S086D
text:
Three analyses based on complementary event selections: (1) fully-reconstructed hadronic decays; (2) semileptonic decays with D_{{s}} exclusively reconstructed; (3) inclusive semileptonic decays.


pdgid: S086D
text:
ABE 2002V uses exclusively reconstructed D_{{s-}} mesons and excludes Deltamass(s)<1.4ps**-1 and 2.4<Deltamass(s)<5.3ps**-1 at 95%CL.


pdgid: S086D
text:
Replaced by ABDALLAH 2004A. Uses D_s()- lepton+, and phi lepton+ vertices, and a multi-variable discriminant as a flavor tagging.


pdgid: S086D
text:
Uses inclusive D_{{s}} vertices and fully reconstructed B_{{s}} decays  and a multi-variable discriminant as a flavor tagging.


pdgid: S086D
text:
BARATE 1998C combines results from D_s h-lepton/Q(hem), D_s h-K in the same side, D_s lepton-lepton/Q(hem) and D_s lepton-K in the same side.


pdgid: S086D
text:
BUSKULIC 1995J uses lepton-Q(hem). They find Deltamass(s)>5.6 [>6.1] for f_{{s}}=10% [12%].  We interpolate to our central value f_{{s}}=10.5%.


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
AAIJ 2016G reports a measurement of time-integrated flavor-specific asymmetry in B_s()0 --> mu+ D_s()- X  decays, A_{{SL}}^s()  = (0.39+-0.26+-0.20)%, which is approximately equal to 4  x Re(epsilon(B_{{s}}()0)) / (1 + |epsilon(B_{{s}}()0) |**2).


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2014 uses the dimuon charge asymmetry with different impact parameters from which it reports A_{{SL}}^s() = -0.86+-0.74E-2.


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2013 reports a measurement of time-integrated flavor-specific asymmetry in mixed semileptonic B_s()0 --> mu+ D_s()- X decays A_{{SL}}^s() = (-1.12+-0.74+-0.17)% which is approximately equal to 4 x Re(epsilon(B_{{s}}()0))/(1 + |epsilon(B_{{s}}()0)|**2).


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
AAIJ 2014D reports a measurement of time-integrated flavor-specific asymmetry in B_s()0 --> mu+ D_s()- X decays, A_{{SL}}^s() = (-0.06+-0.50+-0.36)%, which is approximately equal to4 x  Re(epsilon(B_{{s}}()0)) / (1 + |epsilon(B_{{s}}()0) |**2).


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2011U uses the dimuon charge asymmetry with different impact parameters from which it reports A_{{SL}}^s() = -18.1+-10.6E-3.


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2010E reports a measurement of flavor-specific asymmetry in B_(s)()0 --> mu+ D_(s)^*()- X decays with a decay-time analysis including initial-state flavor tagging, A_{{SL}}^s() = -1.7+-9.1+1.4-1.5E-3 which is approximately equal to 4 x Re(epsilon(B_{{s}}()0)) / (1 + |epsilon(B_{{s}}()0) |**2).


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2010H reports a measurement of like-sign dimuon charge asymmetry of A_{{SL}}^s()  = -9.57+-2.51+-1.46E-3 in semileptonic b-hadron decays. Using the measured production ratio of B_{{d}}()0 and B_{{0}}()0, and the asymmetry of B_{{d}}()0 A_{{SL}}^s() = -4.7+-4.6E-3 measured from B-factories, they obtain the asymmetry for B_{{s}}()0.


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
The first direct measurement of the time integrated flavor untagged charge asymmetry in semileptonic B_{{s}}()0 decays is reported as 2xA_{{SL}}^s()(untagged) = A_{{SL}}^s() = 2.45+-1.93+-0.35E-2.


pdgid: S086ARX
text:
Measured in B_s()0 --> D_s()-+ K+- decays, constraining -2beta_{{s}} by the measurement of  phi_{{s}} = -0.030+-0.033 from HFLAV.


pdgid: S086ARX
text:
Measured in B_s()0 --> D_s()-+ K+- decays, constraining -2beta_{{s}} by the measurement of phi_{{s}} = 0.01+-0.07+-0.0 from AAIJ 2013AR. At 68% CL.


pdgid: S086A28
text:
Measured in restricted phase space with m(K+ pi+ pi-) < 1950 MeV, m(K+ pi-)  < 1200 MeV and m(pi+ pi-) < 1200 MeV.


pdgid: S086A28
text:
A model-independent coherence factor for the decay B_s --> D_s K pi pi (in the restricted phase  space region) is also reported.


pdgid: S086A29
text:
Measured in restricted phase space with m(K+ pi+ pi-) < 1950 MeV, m(K+ pi-)  < 1200 MeV and m(pi+ pi-) < 1200 MeV. The value is modulo 180degree.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2025A reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.086+-0.106+-0.028 rad. in a  time-dependent fit to  B_s()0 --> D_s()+ D_s()-, while allowing CP violation in decay.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2019Q reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.039+-0.022+-0.006 rad. measured  using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAD 2021AE measured phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.087+-0.036+-0.021 rad. using a  time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2021AN measured phi_{{s}} = -2beta_{{s}} = 0.00+-0.28+-0.07 rad, using a   time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays with J/psi --> e+ e-.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
SIRUNYAN 2021E measured phi(s) = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.021+-0.044+-0.010  rad. using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2019AF reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = 0.002+-0.044+-0.012 rad. and  |lambda|= 0.949+-0.036+-0.019, when direct CP violation is allowed. Measured  using a time-dependent fit to B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
Measured phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = 0.119+-0.107+-0.034 rad using time-dependent angular  analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- in the region m(K K) > 1.05 GeV.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAD 2016AP reports phi(s) = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.090+-0.078+-0.041 rad.  that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2016AK reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = 0.23+0.29-0.28+-0.02 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> psi(2S) phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2016S reports phi(s) = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.075+-0.097+-0.031  rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2015I reports phi(s) = -2 beta_{{s}} =  -0.058+-0.049+-0.006 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- decays. It also combines this result with that of AAIJ 2014S and quotes phi(s) = -2 beta_{{s}} =  -0.010+-0.039 rad.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAD 2014U reports phi(s) = -2 beta_{{s}} =  0.12+-0.25+-0.05 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2014AY reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = 0.02+-0.17+-0.02 rad. in a time-dependent fit to  B_s()0 --> D_s()+ D_s()-, while allowing CP violation in decay.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2014S reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = 0.070+-0.068+-0.008 rad. and |lambda|=  0.89+-0.05+-0.01, when direct CP violation is allowed. Measured using a time-dependent fit to B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AALTONEN 2012AJ reports -pi/2 <beta_{{s}}<-1.51 or -0.06<beta_{{s}}< 0.30, or 1.26 <beta_{{s}}<pi/2 rad. at 68% CL.  Measured using the time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
ABAZOV 2012D reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.55+0.38-0.36 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays. A single error includes both statistical and systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2019Q reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.083+-0.041+-0.006 rad. that was  measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2018S reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.10+-0.13+-0.14 rad measured in  B_s()0 --> (K+ pi-) (K- pi+)  in the region 0.75 < m(K+- pi-+) < 1.6 GeV. This  is a b --> d dbar s transition with a decay amplitude phase different from that of b --> c cbar s  transition.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2015K reports -2beta_{{s}} = -0.12+0.14-0.16 rad. The value was obtained by   measuring time-dependent CP asymmetry in B_s()0 --> K+ K- and using a U-spin relation   between B_s()0 --> K+ K- and B0 --> pi+ pi-.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2013AR reports phi_{{s}} = -2beta_{{s}} = 0.01+-0.07+-0.01 rad. obtained from combined fit to B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- and B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- data sets. Also reports separate results of phi_{{s}} = 0.07+-0.09+-0.01 rad. from B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- decays  and phi_{{s}} = -0.14+0.17-0.16+-0.01 rad. from B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAD 2012CV reports phi(s) = -2 beta_{{s}} =  0.22+-0.41+-0.10 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
Reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.44+-0.44+-0.02 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent fit to B_s()0 --> J/psi f_0(980) decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
Reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = 0.15+-0.18+-0.06 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
Reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.019+0.173-0.174+0.004-0.003 rad. which was measured using a time-dependent fit  to B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays, with the pi+ pi- mass within 775 -- 1550 MeV. Searches for, but finds no evidence, for direct CP violation in B_s()0 --> J/psi pi pi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
Reports 0.02 < phi_{{s}}< 0.52 or 1.08 < phi_{{s}}< 1.55 rad. at 68% C.L. confidence regions in the two-dimensional space of phi_{{s}} and Deltawidth(B_{{s}}()0) from B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
confidence regions in the two-dimensional space of 2beta_{{s}} and DeltaGamma from the first measurement of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays using flavor tagging. The probability of a deviation from SM prediction as large as the level of observed data is 15%.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
Combines D0 collaboration measurements of time-dependent angular distributions in B_s()0 --> J/psi phi and charge asymmetry in semileptonic decays. There is a 4-fold ambiguity in the solution.


pdgid: S086PBS
text:
AAIJ 2023AT also reports polarisation-dependent results assuming that the longitudinal weak  phase is CP-conserving and that there is no direct CP violation.


pdgid: S086PBS
text:
AAIJ 2023AT reports phi(s)**s sbar s = -0.074+-0.069 rad and  |lambda| = 1.009+-0.030. Measured using a time-dependent fit to B_s()0 --> phi phi  decays, assuming independence of the helicity of the phi phi decay.


pdgid: S086PBS
text:
Measured using a time-dependent fit to B_s()0 --> phi phi decays, assuming independence of the  helicity of the phi phi decay.


pdgid: S086PBS
text:
AAIJ 2019AP reports also polarisation-dependent results assuming that the longitudinal weak phase is CP-conserving and that there is no direct CP violation, giving phi( s,(parallel))**s sbar s = 0.014+-0.055+-0.011 rad and phi( s,(perp))**s sbar s  = 0.044+-0.059+-0.019 rad.


pdgid: S086PBS
text:
AAIJ 2019AP reports phi(s)**s sbar s = -0.073+-0.115+-0.027 rad and  |lambda|= 0.99+-0.05+-0.01. Measured using a time-dependent fit to B_s()0 --> phi phi  decays, assuming independence of the helicity of the phi phi decay.


pdgid: S086PBS
text:
AAIJ 2014AE value measured in B_s()0 --> phi phi decays. Also reports phi(s)**s sbar s = -0.17+-0.15+-0.03 rad.


pdgid: S086PBS
text:
AAIJ 2013AY uses B_s()0 --> phi phi mode, and reports the 68% CL interval of phi(s)**s sbar s = -2 beta(s)**s sbar s  as [-2.46, -0.76] rad.


pdgid: S086LAM
text:
Measured using time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- in the region m(K K) in the  vicinity of the phi(1020) resonance.


pdgid: S086A07
text:
Measured in flavor tagged time dependent analysis, using tagged and un-tagged events. This result  updates AAIJ 2017B with better selection efficiency and other analysis improvements.


pdgid: S086CT1
text:
Measured in semileptonic B_s()0 --> D_s()- mu+ X decays. Also extracts limit on time and longitudinal components ( -0.8 < Deltaa(T) - 0.396 Deltaa_{{Z}} < 3.9 ) E-13 GeV.


pdgid: S086PAX
text:
Based on time-dependent analysis of B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+ in kinematic range 2 < pT  < 30 GeV/c and 2.1 <eta < 4.5.


pdgid: S086PAX
text:
Based on time-dependent analysis of B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+ in kinematic range 4 < pT < 30 GeV/c and 2.5 <eta < 4.5.


pdgid: S086A27
text:
The B_s()0 --> D_s^*()- mu+ nu_mu decay is reconstructed through the decays of D_s^*()- --> D_s()- gamma,  D_s()- --> K- K+ pi-.


pdgid: S086A27
text:
The B_s()0 --> D_s^*()- mu+ nu_mu decay is reconstructed inclusively without gamma from the  decays of D_s^*()- --> D_s()- gamma, D_s()- --> K- K+ pi-.


pdgid: S087M
text:
Utilized the beam constrained invariant mass peak positions for B^* and B^*_s to extract the measurement.


pdgid: S087M
text:
Uses 14 candidates consistent with B_{{s}} decays into final states with a J/psi and a D_{{s}}^{(*)-}().


pdgid: S087DM
text:
Utilized the beam constrained invariant mass peak positions for B^* and B_{{s}}^* to extract the measurement.


pdgid: S087DM
text:
LEE-FRANZINI 1990 measure 46.7+-0.4+-0.2 MeV for an admixture of B0, B+, and B_{{s}}. They use the shape of the photon line to separate the above value for B_{{s}}.


pdgid: M187M
text:
Uses two-body decays into K- and B+ mesons reconstructed as B+ --> J/psi K+, J/psi --> mu+ mu- or B+ --> Dbar0 pi+, Dbar0 --> K+ pi-.


pdgid: M187DM
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{s1}}(5830)0) - mass(B^*()+) - mass(K-) = 10.35+-0.12+-0.15 MeV which we adjusted by the K- mass.


pdgid: M187R00
text:
With the branching fractions B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.026+-0.031E-3 and B(B0 --> J/psi K^*()0) =  1.28+-0.05E-3.


pdgid: M186M
text:
Observed in B_s2^*()0 --> B+ K-.  Measured production rate of B_{{s2}}^*()0 relative to B+ to be (1.15+-0.23+-0.13)%.


pdgid: M186DM2
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{s2}}(5840)0) - mass(B+) - mass(K-) = 66.73+-0.13+-0.14 MeV which we adjusted by the K- mass.


pdgid: S091M
text:
AAIJ 2020R uses the B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+, J/psi pi+ pi- pi+, J/psi p pbar pi+,  J/psi D_s()+, J/psi D0 K+ and B_s()0 pi+ modes.


pdgid: S091M
text:
AAIJ 2012AV uses the B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+ mode and also measures the mass difference M(B_{{c}}()+) - M(B+) = 994.6+-1.3+-0.6 MeV/c**2.


pdgid: S091M
text:
ABE 1998M observed 20.4+6.2-5.5 events in the B_c()+ --> J/psi(1s) lepton nu_lepton with a significance of >4.8 standard deviations.  The mass value is estimated from m(J/psi(1S) lepton).


pdgid: S091M
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1998O observed 2 candidate events in the B_c()+ --> J/psi(1S) pi+ channel with an estimated background of 0.63+-0.20 events.


pdgid: S091T
text:
Also measures the width difference DeltaGamma = width(B_{{c}}()+)- width(B+) = 4.46+-0.14+-0.07 mm**-1c.


pdgid: S091R1
text:
AALTONEN 2016A  reports [G(B_c()+ --> J/psi(1S) lepton+ nu_lepton anything)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] = 0.211+-0.012+0.021-0.020 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8+-0.7E-2, B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S091R1
text:
AALTONEN 2016A also measures the cross-section CS(B_{{c}}) *B(B_c --> J/psi mu nu_mu) =  0.60+-0.09 nb and estimates the total cross-section CS(B_{{c}}) to be in the range 25+-4 to  52+-8 nb for p_{{T}}(B_{{c}}) > 6 GeV/c and |y(B_{{c}})| < 1.


pdgid: S091R1
text:
ABE 1998M result is derived from the measurement of [sigma(B_{{c}})*B(B_c --> J/psi(1S) lepton nu_lepton)] / [sigma(B+)*B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] = 0.132+0.041-0.037(stat)+-0.031(sys)+0.032(lifetime) by using PDG 1998 values of B(b --> B+) and B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+).


pdgid: S091R1
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1998O reports B(Z --> B_c X)/B(Z --> q q)*B(B_c --> J/psi(1S) lepton nu_lepton) <6.95E-5 at 90%CL. We rescale to our PDG 1998 values of B(Z --> b bbar).


pdgid: S091R1
text:
ABREU 1997E value listed is for an assumed tau(B_{{c}}) = 0.4ps and improves to 1.6E-4 for tau(B_{{c}}) = 1.4ps.


pdgid: S091R1
text:
BARATE 1997H reports B(Z --> B_c X)/B(Z --> q q).B(B_c --> J/psi(1S) lepton nu_lepton) <5.2E-5 at 90%CL. We rescale to our PDG 1996 values of B(Z --> b bbar). A B_c()+ --> J/psi(1S) mu+ nu_mu candidate event is found, compared to all the known background sources 2E-3, which gives mass(B_{{c}}) = 5.96+0.25-0.19 GeV and tau(B_{{c}}) = 1.77+-0.17ps.


pdgid: S091R2
text:
AABOUD 2021 reports a measurement of B(B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+) / B(B+ --> J/psi K+)   . f_{{c}}/f_{{u}} = (0.34+-0.04+0.06-0.02+-0.01) %, at  pT > 13  GeV and |y| < 2.3.


pdgid: S091R2
text:
AAIJ 2015M reports a measurement of B(B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+) / B(B+ --> J/psi K+) . f_{{c}}/f_{{u}} = (0.683+-0.018+-0.009)% at p_{{T}}(B) < 20 GeV and 2.0 < y(B) < 4.5.


pdgid: S091R2
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2015AA reports a measurement of  B(B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+) / B(B+ --> J/psi K+) . f_{{c}}/f_{{u}} = (0.48+-0.05+-0.03+-0.05)%, at pT > 15 GeV and |eta(B)| < 1.6.


pdgid: S091R2
text:
AAIJ 2012AV reports a measurement of B(B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+)/B(B+ --> J/psi K+) f_{{c}}/f_{{u}} = (0.68+-0.10+-0.03+-0.05)% at pT(B) > 4 GeV and 2.5 < eta(B) < 4.5.


pdgid: S091R2
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1998O reports B(Z --> B_c X)/B(Z --> q q)*B(B_c --> J/psi(1S) pi+) <1.06E-4 at 90%CL. We rescale to our PDG 1998 values of B(Z --> b bbar).


pdgid: S091R2
text:
ABREU 1997E value listed is for an assumed tau(B_{{c}}) = 0.4ps and improves to 2.7E-4 for tau(B_{{c}}) = 1.4ps.


pdgid: S091R2
text:
BARATE 1997H reports B(Z --> B_c X)/B(Z --> q q).B(B_c --> J/psi(1S) pi) <3.6E-5 at 90%CL. We rescale to our PDG 1996 values of B(Z --> b bbar).


pdgid: S091R2
text:
ABE 1996R reports B(b --> B_c X)/B(b --> B+ X).B(B_c()+ --> J/psi(1S) pi+)/B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) <0.053 at 95%CL for tau(B_{{c}}) = 0.8ps. It changes from 0.15 to 0.04 for 0.17ps<tau(B_{{c}})<1.6ps. We rescale to our PDG 1996 values of B(b --> B+) = 0.378+-0.022 and B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 0.00101+-0.00014.


pdgid: S091R17
text:
AAIJ 2014W reports also a measurement B(B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+) / B(B_c()+ --> J/psi mu+ nu_mu) = 0.271+-0.016+-0.016 in the region mass(J/psi mu+) > 5.3 GeV.


pdgid: S091R4
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1998O reports B(Z --> B_c X)/B(Z --> q q)*B(B_c --> J/psi(1S) a_1(1260)) <5.29E-4 at 90%CL. We rescale to our PDG 1998 values of B(Z --> b bbar).


pdgid: S091R03
text:
A signal yield of 78+-14 decays is reported with a significance of 6.2 standard deviations using an integrated luminosity of 3 fb**-1 data.


pdgid: S091R69
text:
AAIJ 2024F  reports [G(B_c()+ --> J/psi(1S) D_s()+)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] = 1.63+-0.15+-0.13E-5 which we multiply by our best value B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S091R11
text:
The last uncertainty includes the uncertainties on the branching fractions of the leptonic  J/psi and psi(2S) decays (+-0.005).


pdgid: S091R11
text:
The last uncertainty is due to the uncertainty of the B(psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-)/B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) ratio measurement.


pdgid: S091R23
text:
AAIJ 2016AT reports [G(B_c()+ --> chi_c0() pi+)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] * [[G(bbar --> B+)/G(total)] = 9.8+3.4-3.0+-0.8E-6 which we divide by our best value [G(bbar --> B+)/G(total) = 0.408+-0.007. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S091R66
text:
The last uncertainty includes the knowledge of the chi_c2 --> J/psi gamma branching fraction  (+-0.01).


pdgid: S091R00
text:
Measures the ratio (f_{{c}}/f_{{u}}) x B(B_c()+ --> p pbar pi+) < 3.6E-8  at 95% CL, in the region m(p pbar) < 2.85 GeV/c**2, where f_{{c}}  (f_{{u}}) represents the fragmentation fraction of the b-quark into the B_{{c}}()+ (B_{{u}}()+)  meson.


pdgid: S091R25
text:
AAIJ 2017AG reports [G(B_c()+ --> D0 K+)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] = 9.3+2.8-2.5+-0.6E-7 which we multiply by our best value B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S091R26
text:
AAIJ 2017AG reports [G(B_c()+ --> D0 pi+)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] < 3.9E-7 which we multiply by our best value B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R27
text:
AAIJ 2017AG reports [G(B_c()+ --> D^*()0 pi+)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] < 1.1E-6 which we multiply by our best value B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R28
text:
AAIJ 2017AG reports [G(B_c()+ --> D^*()0 K+)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] < 1.1E-6 which we multiply by our best value B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R30
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ Dbar0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 0.9E-3 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R31
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ D0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 3.7E-4 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R32
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D+ Dbar0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 1.9E-2 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R33
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D+ D0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 1.2E-2 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R34
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [[G(B_c()+ --> D_s^*()+ Dbar0)+ G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ Dbar^*(2007)0)]/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 2.8E-3 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R35
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [[G(B_c()+ --> D_s^*()+ D0)+ G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ D^*(2007)0)]/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 3.0E-3 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R5
text:
BARATE 1998Q reports B(Z --> B_c X)*B(B_c --> D^*(2010)+ Dbar0) <1.9E-3 at 90%CL.  We rescale to our PDG 1998 values of B(Z --> b bbar).


pdgid: S091R36
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [[G(B_c()+ --> D^*(2010)+ Dbar0  ,  D^*()+ --> D+ pi0 / gamma)+ G(B_c()+ --> D+ Dbar^*(2007)0)]/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 5.5E-2 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R37
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [[G(B_c()+ --> D^*(2010)+ D0  ,  D^*()+ --> D+ pi0 / gamma)+ G(B_c()+ --> D+ D^*(2007)0)]/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 2.2E-2 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R38
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s^*()+ Dbar^*(2007)0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 1.1E-2 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R39
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s^*()+ D^*(2007)0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 2.0E-2 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R40
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D^*(2010)+ Dbar^*(2007)0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 6.5E-1 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R41
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D^*(2010)+ D^*(2007)0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 1.3E-1 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R06
text:
AAIJ 2013R  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D+ K^*()0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] < 0.5E-6 which we multiply by our best value B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R07
text:
AAIJ 2013R  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D+ Kbar^*()0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] < 0.4E-6 which we multiply by our best value B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R08
text:
AAIJ 2013R  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ K^*()0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] < 0.7E-6 which we multiply by our best value B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R09
text:
AAIJ 2013R  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ Kbar^*()0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] < 1.1E-6 which we multiply by our best value B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R10
text:
AAIJ 2013R  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ phi)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] < 0.8E-6 which we multiply by our best value B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R02
text:
Derived from Gamma(K+ K0)/GammaxB(bbar --> B_c) / (B(B+ --> K0 pi+) B(bbar --> B+))  < 5.8% at 90% CL  using normalization mode B(B+ --> K0 pi+) = 23.97+-0.53+-0.71E-6 and assuming a B production ratio f(bbar --> B_u()+) = 0.33.


pdgid: S091R64
text:
The B_{{s}}()0 mesons are reconstructed via the decays B_s()0 --> J/psi phi and B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+. The   third uncertainty includes systematic (+-8) and imprecise knowledge of the branching fractions   (+-3).


pdgid: S091R70
text:
AAIJ 2024F  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ mu+ mu-)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] < 7.5E-8 which we multiply by our best value B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: M217M
text:
AAIJ 2019Y reports mass difference measurement of M(B_{{c}}(2S)+) - M(B_{{c}}()+) =  597.2+-1.3+-0.1 MeV. We have adjusted this measurement with our best value of M(B_{{c}}()+) =  . The first uncertainty of the M(B_{{c}}(2S)+) value is a total of uncertainties  reported by the experiment and the second one comes from our best value of M(B_{{c}}()+).


pdgid: M217M
text:
AAIJ 2019Y observed B_{{c}}(2S)+ in the decay mode B_c(2S)+ --> B_c()+ pi+ pi- (B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+)  with 2.2 (3.2) global (local) standard deviations significance.


pdgid: M217M
text:
AAIJ 2019Y  measures B_{{c}}(2S)+- MASS = ( 597.2+-1.3+-0.1 )  +  1.0 [ B_{{c}}()+ MASS- 0.0 ]  . We have adjusted the measurement to use our best values of   ( B_{{c}}()+ MASS = 6274.47+-0.32 )  . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M217M
text:
SIRUNYAN 2019M reports mass difference measurement of M(B_{{c}}(2S)+) - M(B_{{c}}()+) =  596.1+-1.2+-0.8 MeV. We have adjusted this measurement with our best value of M(B_{{c}}()+) =  . The first uncertainty of the M(B_{{c}}(2S)+) value is a total of uncertainties  reported by the experiment and the second one comes from our best value of M(B_{{c}}()+).


pdgid: M217M
text:
SIRUNYAN 2019M observed B_{{c}}(2S)+ in the decay mode B_c(2S)+ --> B_c()+ pi+ pi-  (B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+) with 6.5 standard deviations significance.


pdgid: M217M
text:
SIRUNYAN 2019M  measures B_{{c}}(2S)+- MASS = ( 596.1+-1.2+-0.8 )  +  1.0 [ B_{{c}}()+ MASS- 0.0 ]  . We have adjusted the measurement to use our best values of   ( B_{{c}}()+ MASS = 6274.47+-0.32 )  . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M217M
text:
AAIJ 2018AL reports an upper limit on the ratio of production cross sections for  [CS(B_{{c}}(2S)+)/CS(B_{{c}}()+)].B(B_c(2S)+ --> B_c()+ pi+ pi-) <  0.04 -- 0.09 at  95% CL for the mass value reported by AAD 2014AQ.


pdgid: M217M
text:
Observed in the decay mode B_c(2S)+ --> B_c()+ pi+ pi- (B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+) with 5.2 standard deviations significance.


pdgid: M217R01
text:
AAIJ 2018AL reports an upper limit on the ratio of production cross sections for  [CS(B_{{c}}(2S)+)/CS(B_{{c}}()+)].B(B_c(2S)+ --> B_c()+ pi+ pi-) <  0.04 -- 0.09 at 95% CL for the mass value reported by AAD 2014AQ.


pdgid: M026M
text:
AAIJ 2020H report mass(J/psi)-mass(eta_{{c}}(1S)) = 113.0+-0.7+-0.1 MeV. We use the  current value mass(J/psi) = 3096.900+-0.006 MeV to obtain the quoted mass.


pdgid: M026M
text:
AAIJ 2017AD report mass(J/psi)-mass(eta_{{c}}(1S)) = 110.2+-0.5+-0.9 MeV. We use the  current value mass(J/psi) = 3096.900+-0.006 MeV to obtain the quoted mass.


pdgid: M026M
text:
From a fit of the phi phi invariant mass with the mass and width of eta_{{c}}(1S) as free  parameters.


pdgid: M026M
text:
AAIJ 2015BI reports mass(J/psi) - mass(eta_{{c}}(1S)) = 114.7+-1.5+-0.1 MeV from a  sample of eta_{{c}}(1S) and J/psi produced in b-hadron decays. We have used current value  of mass(J/psi) = 3096.900+-0.006 MeV to arrive at the quoted mass(eta_{{c}}(1S)) result.


pdgid: M026M
text:
MITCHELL 2009 observes a significant asymmetry in the lineshapes of psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c and J/psi --> gamma eta_c transitions. If ignored, this asymmetry could lead to significant bias whenever the mass and width are measured in psi(2S) or J/psi radiative decays.


pdgid: M026W
text:
From a fit to the 4-prong invariant mass in psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c and J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c decays.


pdgid: M026W1
text:
Calculated by us using Gamma(eta_c --> K Kbar pi)  x Gamma(eta_c --> gamma gamma) / Gamma = 0.44+-0.05 keV from PDG 2006 and B(eta_c --> K Kbar pi) = (8.5+-1.8)% from AUBERT 2006E.


pdgid: M026W1
text:
Normalized to the sum of B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+), B(eta_c --> phi phi), B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi+ pi-), and B().


pdgid: M026W1
text:
Normalized to the sum of B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+), B(eta_c --> 2K+ 2K-), B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi+ pi-), and B().


pdgid: M026G14
text:
Calculated by us from the value reported in ASNER 2004 that assumes B(eta_c() --> K Kbar pi) = 5.5+-1.7%


pdgid: M026G14
text:
Calculated by us from the value reported in ABDALLAH 2003J, which uses B(eta_c --> K0S K+- pi-+) = (1.5+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M026G15
text:
Calculated by us from the value reported in ABDALLAH 2003J, which uses B(eta_c --> pi+ pi- K+ K-) = (2.0+-0.7)%.


pdgid: M026G27
text:
Calculated by us from the value reported in ABDALLAH 2003J, which uses B(eta_c --> ) 2(K+ K-) = (2.1+-1.2)%.


pdgid: M026R55
text:
Based on Dalitz-plot analysis of the eta_c --> eta^' K+ K-, eta^' pi+ pi- final states  where the fit fractions and relative phases are determined for numerous two-body intermediate  states.


pdgid: M026R63
text:
ABLIKIM 2021C  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> eta^'(958) eta eta)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 4.86+-0.62+-0.45E-5 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R9
text:
ABLIKIM 2005L  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> rho rho)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.6+-0.6+-0.4E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R9
text:
BISELLO 1991   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> rho rho)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 3.30+-0.30+-0.60E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R9
text:
BISELLO 1991   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> rho rho)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 3.0+-1.3+-0.6E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R16
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K^*(892)0 K- pi+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 2.6+-0.6E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R25
text:
ABLIKIM 2006A  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar^*(892)0 pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.91+-0.64+-0.48E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R21
text:
Using B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 1.25+-0.12+0.10-0.12E-3 from FANG 2003 and B(eta_c --> K Kbar pi) = 5.5+-1.7E-2.


pdgid: M026R26
text:
ABLIKIM 2006A  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> phi 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 0.603E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41E-2.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AP quotes B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0) = 1.15+-0.12+-0.10E-2 which we  multiply by 6 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AP quotes B(eta_c --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 2.60+-0.21+-0.20E-2 which we  multiply by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 27.24+-4.56+-2.88E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N quotes B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c) . B(h_c --> gamma eta_c) .  B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0) = 4.54+-0.76+-0.48E-6 which we multiply by 6 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 34.05+-3.75+-4.50E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N quotes B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c) . B(h_c --> gamma eta_c) .  B(eta_c --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 11.35+-1.25+-1.50E-6 which we multiply by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
Determined from the ratio of B(B+- --> K+- eta_c) B(eta_c --> K Kbar pi) = 7.4+-0.5+-0.7E-5 reported in AUBERT,B 2004B and B(B+- --> K+- eta_c) = 8.7+-1.5E-3 reported in AUBERT 2006E.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BAI 2004   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 6.6+-0.9+-1.5E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BAI 2004 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c) . B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+) =    2.2+-0.3+-0.5E-4 which we  multiply  by  3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BISELLO 1991   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 8.76+-1.80+-1.68E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BISELLO 1991 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c) . B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0) =     1.46+-0.30+-0.28E-4 which we  multiply  by  6 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BISELLO 1991   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 6.9+-1.2+-1.2E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BISELLO 1991 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c) . B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+) =   2.3+-0.4+-0.4E-4     which we  multiply  by  3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
The quoted branching ratios use B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 0.0127+-0.0036. Where relevant, the error in this branching ratio is treated as a common systematic in computing averages.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 7.8+-3.0E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c) . B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0) =     1.3+-0.5E-4 which we multiply by 6 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c) . B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+) =    1.9+-0.5E-4 which we  multiply by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 5.7+-1.5E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
HIMEL 1980B  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 4.5+2.4-1.8E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 3.6+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R15
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N quotes B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c) . B(h_c --> gamma eta_c) .  B(eta_c --> K+ K- eta) = 2.11+-1.01+-0.32E-6 which we multiply by 2 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R15
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 4.22+-2.02+-0.64E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R40
text:
LEES 2014E reports B(eta_c(1S) --> K+ K- eta)/B(eta_c(1S) --> K+ K- pi0) = 0.571+-0.025+-0.051, which we divide by 3 to account for isospin symmetry. It uses both eta --> gamma gamma and eta --> pi+ pi- pi0 decays.


pdgid: M026R6
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 7.22+-1.47+-1.11E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R05
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> eta 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 19.17+-3.77+-3.72E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R01
text:
We have multiplied the value of Gamma(K+ K- pi+ pi- pi0)/Gamma(K0S K()+- pi()-+) reported in DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011M by a factor 1/3 to obtain . Not independent from other measurements reported in DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011M.


pdgid: M026R06
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N quotes B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c) . B(h_c --> gamma eta_c) .  B(eta_c --> K0S K- pi- 2pi+) = 12.01+-2.22+-2.04E-6 which we multiply by 2 to take c.c. into account.


pdgid: M026R06
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K0 K- pi+ pi- pi+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 24.02+-4.44+-4.08E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R23
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K+ K- 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 3.60+-1.71+-0.64E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R23
text:
ABLIKIM 2006A  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K+ K- 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.21+-0.32+-0.24E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R51
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AJ reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 1.6E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 3.6E-3.


pdgid: M026R07
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 20.31+-2.20+-3.33E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R08
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> 2(pi+ pi- pi0))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 75.13+-7.42+-9.99E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R24
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 8.82+-1.57+-1.59E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R24
text:
ABLIKIM 2006A  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 2.59+-0.32+-0.47E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R2
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 0.65+-0.19+-0.10E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R2
text:
WU 2006   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> eta_c K+)] = 1.42+-0.11+0.16-0.20E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 1.10+-0.07E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R2
text:
BAI 2004   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.9+-0.3+-0.3E-5 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R2
text:
BISELLO 1991   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 0.13+-0.04+-0.03E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R2
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.4+-0.7E-5 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R2
text:
HIMEL 1980B  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 8+8-4E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 3.6+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R09
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.53+-0.49+-0.23E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R53
text:
LU 2019   reports 2.83+0.36-0.34+-0.35E-3 from a measurement of [G(eta_c(1S) --> K+ pbar Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> eta_c K+)] assuming B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 9.6+-1.1E-4, which we rescale to our best value B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 1.10+-0.07E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R54
text:
LU 2019   reports 3.48+-1.48+-0.46E-3 from a measurement of [G(eta_c(1S) --> Lambdabar(1520) Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> eta_c K+)] assuming B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 9.6+-1.1E-4, which we rescale to our best value B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 1.10+-0.07E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R28
text:
ABLIKIM 2013C  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 3.60+-0.48+-0.31E-5 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R29
text:
ABLIKIM 2013C  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> Xi- Xibar+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.51+-0.27+-0.14E-5 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R31
text:
ABLIKIM 2013I  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> gamma gamma)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 4.5+-1.2+-0.6E-6 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R31
text:
ADAMS 2008   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> gamma gamma)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.2+2.7-1.1+-0.3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R31
text:
WICHT 2008   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> gamma gamma)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> eta_c K+)] = 2.2+0.9-0.7+0.4-0.2E-7 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 1.10+-0.07E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R34
text:
ABLIKIM 2011G  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 1.82E-6 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41E-2.


pdgid: M026R34
text:
ABLIKIM 2006B  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 1.1E-5 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41E-2.


pdgid: M026R35
text:
ABLIKIM 2011G  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 6.0E-7 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41E-2.


pdgid: M026R35
text:
ABLIKIM 2006B  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 0.71E-5 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41E-2.


pdgid: M026R36
text:
ABLIKIM 2006B  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 0.96E-5 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41E-2.


pdgid: M026R37
text:
ABLIKIM 2006B  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 0.53E-5 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41E-2.


pdgid: M026R37
text:
Using Gamma(gamma gamma)(eta_{{c}}) = 5.3+-0.5 keV. UEHARA 2013 reports  Gamma(gamma gamma)xB(K0S K0S) < 1.6 eV.


pdgid: M026R37
text:
Using Gamma(gamma gamma)(eta_{{c}}) = 5.3+-0.5 keV. UEHARA 2013 reports  Gamma(gamma gamma)xB(K0S K0S) < 0.29 eV.


pdgid: M026R64
text:
The value reported by BALTRUSAITIS 1986 has been multiplied by 3/2 to account for isospin  symmetry.


pdgid: M026R73
text:
BAI 2004 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c) . B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+) =  2.2+-0.3+-0.5E-4 which we multiply by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R73
text:
BISELLO 1991 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c) . B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0) =  1.46+-0.30+-0.28E-4 which we multiply by 6 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R73
text:
BISELLO 1991 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c) . B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+) = 2.3+-0.4+-0.4E-4  which we multiply by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R73
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c) . B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0) =  1.3+-0.5E-4 which we multiply by 6 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R73
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c) . B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+) =  1.9+-0.5E-4 which we multiply by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R74
text:
VINOKUROVA 2011 reports B(B+ --> eta_c K+ , eta_c --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 26.7+-1.4+2.9-2.6+-4.9E-6,  where the first uncertainty is   statistical, the second is due to systematics, and the third comes  from interference of   eta_c(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+ with nonresonant K0S K+- pi-+. We  combined both systematic uncertainties to single values. We multiply the reported result by 3 to  account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N quotes B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c) . B(h_c --> gamma eta_c)  . B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0) = 4.54+-0.76+-0.48E-6 which we multiply by 6 to  account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 27.24+-4.56+-2.88E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N quotes B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c) . B(h_c --> gamma eta_c)  . B(eta_c --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 11.35+-1.25+-1.50E-6 which we multiply by 3 to  account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 34.05+-3.75+-4.50E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R77
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N quotes B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c) . B(h_c --> gamma eta_c)  . B(eta_c --> K+ K- eta) = 2.11+-1.01+-0.32E-6 which we multiply by 2 to  account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R77
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar eta)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 4.22+-2.02+-0.64E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R78
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 7.22+-1.47+-1.11E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R81
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> eta 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 19.17+-3.77+-3.72E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R83
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K+ K- pi+ pi-)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 4.16+-0.76+-0.59E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N quotes B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c) . B(h_c --> gamma eta_c)  . B(eta_c --> K0S K- pi- 2pi+) = 12.01+-2.22+-2.04E-6 which we multiply by 2  to take c.c. into account.


pdgid: M026R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K0 K- pi+ pi- pi+ + c.c.)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 24.02+-4.44+-4.08E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R87
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K+ K- 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 3.60+-1.71+-0.64E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R89
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> 2(K+ K-))/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 0.94+-0.37+-0.14E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R91
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0 pi0)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 20.31+-2.20+-3.33E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R92
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 7.51+-0.85+-1.11E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R95
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> 2(pi+ pi- pi0))/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 75.13+-7.42+-9.99E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R96
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 8.82+-1.57+-1.59E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R98
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 0.65+-0.19+-0.10E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026P02
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 1.53+-0.49+-0.23E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026P07
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 2.30+-0.65+-0.36E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070M
text:
Reanalysis of ZHOLENTZ 1980 using new electron mass (COHEN 1987) and radiative corrections (KURAEV 1985).


pdgid: M070M
text:
Mass central value and systematic error recalculated by us according to Eq.(16) in ARMSTRONG 1993B, using the value for the psi(2S) mass from AULCHENKO 2003.


pdgid: M070M
text:
From a sample of eta_{{c}}(1S) and J/psi produced in b-hadron decays. Systematic uncertainties not estimated.


pdgid: M070M
text:
From a simultaneous fit to e+ e-, mu+ mu- and hadronic channels assuming Gamma(e+ e-) = Gamma(mu+ mu-).


pdgid: M070W
text:
Calculated by us from the reported values of Gamma(e+ e-)xB(mu+ mu-) using B(e+ e-) = (5.94+-0.06)% and B(mu+ mu-) = (5.93+-0.06)%.


pdgid: M070W1
text:
From a simultaneous fit to e+ e-, mu+ mu-, and hadronic channels assuming Gamma(e+ e-) = Gamma(mu+ mu-).


pdgid: M070W1
text:
Calculated by us from the reported values of Gamma(e+ e-)xB(mu+ mu-) using B(mu+ mu-) = (5.93+-0.06)%.


pdgid: M070G25
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> eta pi+ pi-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 0.51+-0.22+-0.03 eV which we divide by our best value B(eta --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 23.02+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070Q20
text:
LEES 2021C  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> eta pi+ pi- pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 3pi0)] = 21.1+-1.7+-3.2 eV which we divide by our best value B(eta --> 3pi0) = 32.56+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070Q19
text:
LEES 2021C  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> eta pi+ pi- 3pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] = 10.6+-1.6+-1.6 eV which we divide by our best value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070Q54
text:
LEES 2023   reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> eta K+ K-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 3pi0)] = 1.55+-0.51+-0.16 eV which we divide by our best value B(eta --> 3pi0) = 32.56+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G24
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega pi+ pi-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 47.8+-3.1+-3.2 eV which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070P54
text:
LEES 2018E  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega pi0 pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 24.8+-1.8+-2.5 eV which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070Q18
text:
LEES 2021C  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega 3pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 9.4+-2.3+-1.5 eV which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070Q21
text:
LEES 2021C  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega eta) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 3pi0)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 4.9+-2.1+-0.7 eV which we divide by our best values B(eta --> 3pi0) = 32.56+-0.21E-2, B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M070P58
text:
LEES 2018E  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega pi0 eta) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 1.7+-0.8+-0.3 eV which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070Q11
text:
LEES 2021   reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega pi+ pi- 2pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 165+-9+-25 eV which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G29
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega K Kbar) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 3.3+-1.3+-1.2 eV which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070GY6
text:
LEES 2014H  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> K_2^*(1430)+ K0S pi- + c.c.) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi)] = 10.0+-4.8+-0.8 eV which we divide by our best value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = 49.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G02
text:
LEES 2012F  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> Kbar_2^*(1430)0 K^*(892)0 + c.c.) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi)] = 12.89+-0.54+-0.41 eV which we divide by our best value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = 49.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G02
text:
AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> Kbar_2^*(1430)0 K^*(892)0 + c.c.) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi)] = 16.4+-1.1+-1.4 eV which we divide by our best value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = 49.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070GY9
text:
Dividing by (1/4)**2 to take into account B(K^*(892) --> K0S pi) = 1/4 and  B(K^*(1430) --> K0S pi) = 1/4 B(K^*(1430) --> K pi).


pdgid: M070GY9
text:
LEES 2014H  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> K_2^*(1430)- K^*(892)+ + c.c.) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi)] = 9.28+-8.0+-0.32 eV which we divide by our best value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = 49.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G14
text:
LEES 2012F  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi pi+ pi-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 2.19+-0.23+-0.07 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G14
text:
SHEN 2009   reports 4.50+-0.41+-0.26 eV from a measurement of [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi pi+ pi-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] assuming B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.2+-0.6E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G14
text:
AUBERT,BE 2006D  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi pi+ pi-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 2.61+-0.30+-0.18 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G15
text:
LEES 2012F  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi pi0 pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 1.36+-0.27+-0.07 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G15
text:
AUBERT,BE 2006D  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi pi0 pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 1.54+-0.40+-0.16 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G10
text:
AUBERT 2006D  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi 2(pi+ pi-)) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.47+-0.09+-0.03E-2 keV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G28
text:
LEES 2023 quotes Gamma(e e)**J/psi.B(J/psi --> phi eta)  . B(phi --> K+ K-) . B(eta --> 3pi0) = 0.64+-0.26+-0.06 eV.


pdgid: M070G28
text:
AUBERT 2007AU quotes Gamma(e e)**J/psi.B(J/psi --> phi eta)  . B(phi --> K+ K-) . B(eta --> 3pi) = 0.84+-0.37+-0.05 eV.


pdgid: M070G05
text:
LEES 2012F  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi f_0(980) --> phi pi+ pi-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.69+-0.11+-0.05 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G05
text:
Multiplied by 2/3 to take into account the phi pi+ pi- mode only. Using B(phi --> K+ K-) = (49.2+-0.6)%.


pdgid: M070G05
text:
AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi f_0(980) --> phi pi+ pi-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.50+-0.11+-0.04 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G06
text:
LEES 2012F  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi f_0(980) --> phi pi0 pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.48+-0.12+-0.05 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


