# pdgfootnote

pdgid: S010R42
text:
Obtained from measuring B(K(mu3gamma)) / B(K_{{mu3}}()) and using PDG 2002 value B(K_{{mu3}}()) = 3.27%. B(K(mu3gamma)) = 8.82+-0.94+-0.86E-5 is obtained for 5 MeV < E(gamma) < 30 MeV.


pdgid: S010R79
text:
The cut on the photon energy implies W**2 > 0.2. BATLEY 2010A obtains the INT and DE fractional branchings with respect to IB from a simultaneous kinematical fit of INT and DE and then we use the PDG 2010 value for B(K+ --> pi+ pi0) = 20.66+-0.08 to determine the IB. The INT and DE correlation coefficients -0.83. Assuming a constant electric amplitude, X(E), this INT value implies X(E) = -24+-6 GeV**-4.


pdgid: S010R65
text:
The cut on the photon energy implies W**2 > 0.2. BATLEY 2010A obtains the INT and DE fractional branchings with respect to IB from a simultaneous kinematical fit of INT and DE and then we use the PDG 2010 value for B(K+ --> pi+ pi0) = 20.66+-0.08 to determine the IB. The INT and DE correlation coefficients -0.93. Assuming constant electric and magnetic amplitudes, X(E) and X(M), these INTand DE values imply X(E) = -24+-6 GeV**-4 and X(M) = -254+-9 GeV**-4.


pdgid: S010R65
text:
ADLER 2000C measures the INT component to be (-0.4+-1.6)% of the inner bremsstrahlung (IB) component.


pdgid: S010R00
text:
BATLEY 2019 result is obtained from an exposure of 1.7E11 charged kaon decays recorded  in 2003 -- 2004. The study of the kinematic space shows evidence for a structure dependent  contribution consistent with predictions from chiral perturbation theory.


pdgid: S010R63
text:
ARTAMONOV 2024 obtains the branching ratio B(K+ --> pi+ pi0 pi0 gamma) = 3.7+-0.9+-0.3E-6  by normalizing to B(K+ --> pi+ pi0 pi0) = 1.760+-0.023E-2.


pdgid: S010R12
text:
CORTINA-GIL 2024 uses data collected by NA62 at CERN in 2017 to 2018.  This result, for the  full kinematic range, is extrapolated using O(p**6) ChPT theoretical calculation from the  model-independent branching fraction, B(K+ --> pi+ gamma gamma)=9.46+-0.19+-0.07E-7,  obtained for 0.2<(mass(gamma gamma)/mass(K))**2 < 0.51. The  ChPT  parameter chat = 1.144+-0.069+-0.034 is measured.


pdgid: S010R12
text:
LAZZERONI 2014 combines NA62 and NA48/2 results. The result for the full kinematic range is  extrapolated from the model-independent branching fraction 9.65+-0.61+-0.14E-7 for (mass(gamma gamma)/mass(K))**2 > 0.2. The measured ChPT parameter chat = 1.86+-0.25.


pdgid: S010R12
text:
KITCHING 1997 is extrapolated from their model-independent branching fraction 6.0+-1.5+-0.7E-7 for 100 MeV/c<P(pi+)<180 MeV/c using Chiral Perturbation Theory.


pdgid: S010R12
text:
BATLEY 2014 uses data collected in 2003 and 2004. Branching ratio is obtained by determining the parameter  chat = 1.41+-0.38+-0.11 and integrating the O(p^6) chiral spectrum. A model  independent value for the branching ratio is also obtained 8.77+-0.87+-0.17E-7 for kinematic range (mass(gamma gamma)/mass(K))**2 > 0.2.


pdgid: S010R12
text:
ARTAMONOV 2005 limit assumes ChPT with chat= 1.8 with unitarity corrections. With chat= 1.6 and no unitarity corrections they obtain < 2.3E-8  at 90% CL. This partial branching ratio is predicted to be 6.10E-9 and 0.49E-9 for the cases  with and without unitarity correction.


pdgid: S010R77
text:
BATLEY 2008 also reports the Chiral Perturbation Theory parameter chat = 0.9+-0.45 obtained using the shape of the e+ e- gamma invariant mass spectrum. By extrapolating the theoretical amplitude to mass(e e gamma) < 260 MeV, it obtains the inclusive B(K+ --> pi+ e+ e- gamma) = 1.29+-0.13+-0.03E-8, where the first error is the combined statistical and systematic errors and the second error  is from the uncertainty in chat.


pdgid: S010R41
text:
CORTINA-GIL 2021 assumes Standard Model mu spectrum. The search is performed in the   reconstructed missing mass interval m(miss) > 316 MeV/c**2.


pdgid: S010R41
text:
ARTAMONOV 2016 assumes Standard model mu spectrum. The search is performed in the muon  momentum region between 130 and 175 MeV/c.


pdgid: S010R15
text:
Value extrapolated from a measurement in the region z = (/mass(K))**2 >0.08. BATLEY 2009 also evaluated the shape of the form factor  using four different theoretical models.


pdgid: S010R15
text:
APPEL 1999 establishes vector nature of this decay and determines form  factor f(Z)= f_{{0}}() (1 + deltaZ), Z =  M(e e)**2/mass**2(K), delta = 2.14+-0.13+-0.15. Also reports  constraints on scalar and tensor interactions: |f_{{S}}| < 6.6E-5, |f_{{T}}|  < 3.7E-4 at 90% C.L.


pdgid: S010R15
text:
ALLIEGRO 1992 assumes a vector interaction with a form factor given by lambda = 0.105+-0.035+-0.015 and a correlation coefficient of -0.82.


pdgid: S010R16
text:
CORTINA-GIL 2022A also studies the form factor f(z) dependence of the decay, described  via  single photon exchange: assuming a linear form factor including pi-pi rescattering,   W(pi pi), as in DAMBROSIO 1998A, finding f(z) = G_{{F}} mass**2(K) (a_{{+}}()   + b_{{+}}() z) + W(pi pi)(z), a_{{+}}() = -0.575+-0.013, b_{{+}}() = -0.722+-0.043.


pdgid: S010R16
text:
BATLEY 2011A also studies the form factor f(z) dependence of the decay, described via single photon exchange:  i)  assuming a linear form factor,  f(z) = f_{{0}}() (1+ delta z ), z = (M(mu mu)/mass(K))**2, finding  f_{{0}}() = 0.470+-0.040 and delta = 3.11+-0.57 and ii) assuming a linear form factor including pi-pi rescattering , W(pi pi), as in DAMBROSIO 1998A, finding f(z) = G_{{F}} mass**2(K) (a_{{+}}() + b_{{+}}() z) + W(pi pi)(z), a_{{+}}() = -0.575+-0.039, b_{{+}}() = -0.813+-0.145.


pdgid: S010R16
text:
PARK 2002 ``+-'' result comes from combining K+ --> pi+ mu+ mu- and K- --> pi- mu+ mu-, assuming CP is conserved.


pdgid: S010R16
text:
MA 2000 establishes vector nature of this decay and determines form  factor f(z)= f(0) (1 + delta z), z = (M(mu mu)/mass(K))**2,  delta = 2.45+1.30-0.95.


pdgid: S010R16
text:
ADLER 1997C gives systematic error 0.7E-8 and theoretical uncertainty 0.6E-8, which we combine in quadrature to obtain our second error.


pdgid: S010R05
text:
Quoted limit is obtained using data collected from 2017 to 2018. CORTINA-GIL 2023B also  reports upper limits at 90% C.L. at the level of E-9 for the branching ratios of two  prompt decay chains involving pair-production of hidden-sector mediators: K+ --> pi+ a a, a --> e+ e-  and K+ --> pi+ S, S --> X X , X -->  e+ e-.


pdgid: S010R32
text:
CORTINA-GIL 2021B analysis of the NA62 data taken in 2016 -- 2018 observed 20  candidate events with an expected background of 7 events. The achieved single event sensitivity is  0.839+-0.054E-11. The quoted branching ratio includes result from CORTINA-GIL 2020C  which observed two candidate events. This provides evidence for the very rare K+ --> pi+ nu nubar decay,  observed with a significance of 3.4 sigma. Search for a feebly interacting scalar or  pseudo-scalar particle X in the decay K+ --> pi+ X was performed and an upper limit from  < 3E-11 to < 6E-11 at the 90% C.L. was set for an invisible particle  with a mass of 0 -- 110 MeV/c**2 and < 1E-11 for mass of 160 -- 260  MeV/c**2.


pdgid: S010R32
text:
CORTINA-GIL 2020C analysis of the NA62 data taken in 2017 observed two candidate events with   an expected background of 1.5 events. The achieved single event sensitivity is 0.389+-0.024E-10. The   quoted branching ratio includes result from CORTINA-GIL 2019B which observed one candidate   event. The corresponding upper limit B(K+ --> pi+ nu nubar) < 1.78E-10 at   90% C.L. Superseded by CORTINA-GIL 2021B.


pdgid: S010R32
text:
Based on a sample of 1.21E11 K+ decays collected in 2016. One signal candidate is observed  while the expected background is 0.152 events. The single-event-sensitivity is estimated to be  3.15E-10.


pdgid: S010R32
text:
Observed 3 events with an estimated background of 0.93+-0.17+0.32-0.24. Signal-to-background ratio for each of these 3 events is 0.20, 0.42, and 0.47.


pdgid: S010R32
text:
Value obtained combining the previous result ADLER 2002C with 1 event and the present result with 0 events to obtain an expected background 1.22+-0.24 events and 1 event observed.


pdgid: S010R32
text:
Value obtained combining the previous E787 result ADLER 2002 with 2 events and the present E949 with 1 event. The additional event has a signal-to-background ratio 0.9. Superseded by ARTAMONOV 2008.


pdgid: S010R57
text:
COOPER 1982 and LYONS 1981 limits on nu_{{e}} observation are here interpreted as limits on lepton family number violation in the absence of mixing.


pdgid: S010R49
text:
This result combines SHER 2005 1998 data, APPEL 2000 1996 data, and data from BERGMAN 1997 and PISLAK 1997 theses, all from BNL-E865, with LEE 1990 BNL-E777 data.


pdgid: S010R09
text:
ASHRAF 2024 performed the search using a dataset collected by the NA62 experiment from 2016  to 2018.


pdgid: S010R31
text:
CORTINA-GIL 2022 uses the complete dataset collected by the NA62 experiment at CERN from 2016  to 2018. Supersedes CORTINA-GIL 2019A.


pdgid: S010R70
text:
BATLEY 2017 result is based on data taken in 2003 to 2004. Limits for two-body resonance  X in K+- --> pi mu mu decays are also reported.


pdgid: S010R01
text:
CORTINA-GIL 2022 uses the complete dataset collected by the NA62 experiment at CERN from 2016  to 2018.


pdgid: S010R58
text:
COOPER 1982 limit on nubar_{{e}} observation is here interpreted as a limit on lepton number violation in the absence of mixing.


pdgid: S010D2
text:
SMITH 1973 value of K+- --> pi+- pi+ pi- rate difference is derived from SMITH 1973 value of K+- --> pi+- 2pi0 rate difference.


pdgid: S010PTM
text:
Includes three sets of data: 96-97 (ABE 1999S), 98, and 99-00 totaling about three times the ABE 1999S data sample. Corresponds to P(T) < 5.0E-3 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S010IXI
text:
Includes three sets of data: 96-97 (ABE 1999S), 98, and 99-00 totaling about three times the ABE 1999S data sample.  Corresponds to  Im(xi) < 0.016 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S010DG
text:
BATLEY 2007E includes data from BATLEY 2006. Uses quadratic parametrization and value g_{{+}}()+ g_{{-}}() = 2g from BATLEY 2007B. This measurement neglects any possible charge asymmetries in higher order slope parameters h or k.


pdgid: S010GTP
text:
They form new world averages g(-) = (0.617+-0.018) and g(+) = (0.684+-0.033) which give Deltag(tau') = 0.051+-0.028.


pdgid: S010DG0
text:
BATLEY 2007E includes data from BATLEY 2006A. Uses quadratic parametrization and PDG 2006 value g = 0.626+-0.007 to obtain g_+() - g_-() = 2.2+-2.1+-0.7E-4. Neglects any possible charge asymmetries in higher order slope parameters h or k.


pdgid: S010DG0
text:
Asymmetry obtained assuming that g_{{+}}()+g_{{-}}() = 2x0.652 (PDG 2002) and that asymmetries in h and k are zero.


pdgid: S010DG0
text:
Linear and quadratic slopes from PDG 2004 are used. Any possible charge asymmetries in higher order slope parameters h or k are neglected.


pdgid: S010G0
text:
This fit is obtained with the CABIBBO 2005 matrix element in the 2pi0 invariant mass squared range 0.074094 < mass**2(2pi0)< 0.104244 GeV**2. Electromagnetic corrections and CHPT constraints for pi pi phase shifts (a_{{0}}() and a_{{2}}()) have been  used. Also measured (a_{{0}}()- a_{{2}}()) mass(pi+) = 0.2646+-0.0021+-0.0023, where k_{{0}}() was kept fixed in the fit at -0.0099.


pdgid: S010GBB
text:
This fit is obtained using parametrizations of COLANGELO 2006A and BISSEGGER 2009 in the 2pi0 invariant mass squared range 0.074094 < mass**2(2pi0)< 0.104244 GeV**2. Electromagnetic corrections and CHPT constraints for pi pi phase shifts (a_{{0}}() and a_{{2}}()) have been  used. Also measured (a_{{0}}()- a_{{2}}()) mass(pi+) = 0.2633+-0.0024+-0.0024, where k_{{0}}() was kept fixed in the fit at 0.0085.


pdgid: S010L0
text:
Data collected in 2004 by NA48/2. Obtained from a fit with a quadratic vector form factor.  Correlation coefficient with linear slope is 0.511, with quadratic slope is -0.513.  chi**2/NDF = 409.9/381. BATLEY 2018 also performed a combined  K_{{e3}}()+- and K_{{mu3}}()+- fit assuming mu-e universality and obtained 14.47+-0.63+-1.17E-3.


pdgid: S010L0
text:
HORIE 2001 assumes mu-e universality in K(lepton3)**+ decay and uses SHIMIZU 2000 value lambda=0.0278+-0.0040 from K(e3)**+- decay.


pdgid: S010LPE
text:
Data collected in 2004 by NA48/2. Correlation coefficient with quadratic slope is -0.929.  chi**2/NDF = 569.1/687. BATLEY 2018 also performed a combined  K_{{e3}}()+- and K_{{mu3}}()+- fit assuming mu-e universality and obtained 24.24+-0.75+-1.3E-3.


pdgid: S010LPE
text:
YUSHCHENKO 2004B lambda'(+) and lambda''(+) are strongly correlated with coefficient rho(lambda'(+), lambda''(+)) = -0.95.


pdgid: S010LQE
text:
Data collected in 2004 by NA48/2. Correlation coefficient with quadratic slope is -0.929.  chi**2/NDF = 569.1/687. BATLEY 2018 also performed a combined  K_{{e3}}()+- and K_{{mu3}}()+- fit assuming mu-e universality and obtained 1.67+-0.29+-0.41E-3.


pdgid: S010LPM
text:
Data collected in 2004 by NA48/2. Correlation coefficient with quadratic slope is -0.974, with  scalar slope is 0.511. chi**2/NDF = 409.9/381. BATLEY 2018 also  performed a combined K_{{e3}}()+- and K_{{mu3}}()+- fit assuming mu-e universality  and obtained 24.24+-0.75+-1.3E-3.


pdgid: S010LQM
text:
Data collected in 2004 by NA48/2. Correlation coefficient with linear slope is -0.974, with  scalar slope is 0.513. chi**2/NDF = 409.9/381. BATLEY 2018 also  performed a combined K_{{e3}}()+- and K_{{mu3}}()+- fit assuming mu-e universality  and obtained 1.67+-0.29+-0.41E-3.


pdgid: S010MVE
text:
Data collected in 2004 by NA48/2. chi**2/NDF = 568.9/688. BATLEY 2018  also performed a combined K_{{e3}}()+- and K_{{mu3}}()+- fit assuming mu-e  universality and obtained 884.4+-3.1+-6.7 MeV.


pdgid: S010MVM
text:
Data collected in 2004 by NA48/2. chi**2/NDF = 409.9/382. BATLEY 2018  also performed a combined K_{{e3}}()+- and K_{{mu3}}()+- fit assuming mu-e  universality and obtained 884.4+-3.1+-6.7 MeV.


pdgid: S010MSM
text:
Data collected in 2004 by NA48/2. chi**2/NDF = 409.9/382. BATLEY 2018  also performed a combined K_{{e3}}()+- and K_{{mu3}}()+- fit assuming mu-e  universality and obtained 1208.3+-21.2+-47.5 MeV.


pdgid: S010LAM
text:
Data collected in 2004 by NA48/2. chi**2/NDF = 569.0/688. BATLEY 2018  also performed a combined K_{{e3}}()+- and K_{{mu3}}()+- fit assuming mu-e  universality and obtained 24.99+-0.20+-0.62E-3.


pdgid: S010LMM
text:
Data collected in 2004 by NA48/2. chi**2/NDF = 410.3/382. BATLEY 2018  also performed a combined K_{{e3}}()+- and K_{{mu3}}()+- fit assuming mu-e  universality and obtained 24.99+-0.20+-0.62E-3.


pdgid: S010LLM
text:
Data collected in 2004 by NA48/2. Combined fit with dispersive vector form factor Lambda(+)  = 25.36+-0.58+-0.72. Correlation coefficient is 0.104. chi**2/NDF =  410.3/382. BATLEY 2018 also performed a combined K_{{e3}}()+- and K_{{mu3}}()+- fit assuming  mu-e universality and obtained 183.65+-5.92+-14.25E-3.


pdgid: S010FSM
text:
The second error is the theoretical error from the uncertainty in the chiral perturbation theory prediction for lambda(0), +-0.0053, combined in quadrature with the systematic error +-0.0009.


pdgid: S010FSF
text:
BATLEY 2012 uses data collected in 2003 -- 2004. The result is obtained from a measurement of Gamma(pi+ pi- e nu)/Gamma(pi+ pi- pi+) and assumed PDG 2012 value of Gamma(pi+ pi- pi+)/Gamma = 5.59+-0.04E-2.


pdgid: S010RSP
text:
Radiative corrections included. Using Roy equations and including isospin breaking, BATLEY 2010C obtains the following scattering lengths a_{{0}}^0() = 0.2220+-0.0128+-0.0050+-0.0037(theor.), a_{{0}}^2() = -0.0432+-0.0086+-0.0034+-0.0028(theor.). The correlation with f_{{s}}^''()/f_{{s}} = -0.954 and with f_{{e}}^'()/f_{{s}} = 0.080. Supersedes BATLEY 2008A.


pdgid: S010RSP
text:
Radiative corrections included. Using Roy equations and not including isospin breaking, BATLEY 2008A obtains the following pi pi scattering length a(0)**0 = 0.233+-0.016+-0.007 a(0)**2 = -0.0471+-0.011+-0.004.


pdgid: S010RPB
text:
Radiative corrections included. Using Roy equations and including isospin breaking, BATLEY 2010C obtains the following scattering lengths a_{{0}}^0() = 0.2220+-0.0128+-0.0050+-0.0037(theor.), a_{{0}}^2() = -0.0432+-0.0086+-0.0034+-0.0028(theor.). The correlation with f_{{s}}^'()/f_{{s}} = -0.954 and with f_{{e}}^'()/f_{{s}} = 0.019. Supersedes BATLEY 2008A.


pdgid: S010REF
text:
Radiative corrections included. Using Roy equations and including isospin breaking, BATLEY 2010C obtains the following scattering lengths a_{{0}}^0() = 0.2220+-0.0128+-0.0050+-0.0037(theor.), a_{{0}}^2() = -0.0432+-0.0086+-0.0034+-0.0028(theor.). The correlation with f_{{s}}^'()/f_{{s}} = 0.080 and with f_{{s}}^''()/f_{{s}} = 0.019. Supersedes BATLEY 2008A.


pdgid: S010RPF
text:
Radiative corrections included. Using Roy equations and including isospin breaking, BATLEY 2010C obtains the following scattering lengths a_{{0}}^0() = 0.2220+-0.0128+-0.0050+-0.0037(theor.), a_{{0}}^2() = -0.0432+-0.0086+-0.0034+-0.0028(theor.). Supersedes BATLEY 2008A.


pdgid: S010RGF
text:
Radiative corrections included. Using Roy equations and including isospin breaking, BATLEY 2010C obtains the following scattering lengths a_{{0}}^0() = 0.2220+-0.0128+-0.0050+-0.0037(theor.), a_{{0}}^2() = -0.0432+-0.0086+-0.0034+-0.0028(theor.). Supersedes BATLEY 2008A. The correlation with g_{{p}}^'()/f_{{s}} = -0.914. Supersedes BATLEY 2008A.


pdgid: S010RGF
text:
Radiative corrections included. Using Roy equations PISLAK 2003 obtains the following scattering lengths a_{{0}}^0() = 0.203+-0.033+-0.004, a_{{0}}^2() = -0.055+-0.023+-0.003.


pdgid: S010RGP
text:
Radiative corrections included. Using Roy equations and including isospin breaking, BATLEY 2010C obtains the following scattering lengths a_{{0}}^0() = 0.2220+-0.0128+-0.0050+-0.0037(theor.), a_{{0}}^2() = -0.0432+-0.0086+-0.0034+-0.0028(theor.). The correlation with g_{{p}}/f_{{s}} = -0.914. Supersedes BATLEY 2008A.


pdgid: S010F+E
text:
AMBROSINO 2009E measures the absolute value |F(A) + F(V)| which is parametrized as |F(A) + F(V)| = F(V) (1 + lambda(1-x)) + F(A),  x = 2E(gamma)/mass(K). (F(A) + F(V)) and lambda are fit parameters. The fitted value of lambda = 0.38+-0.20+-0.02 with a correlation of -0.93 between (F(A) + F(V)) and  lambda.


pdgid: S010F+E
text:
HEINTZE 1979 quotes absolute value of |F(A) + F(V)| sin(theta(c)).  We use sin(theta(c)) = V(us) =0.2205.


pdgid: S010F+E
text:
HEARD 1975 quotes absolute value of |F(A) + F(V)| sin(theta(c)).  We use sin(theta(c)) = V(us) =0.2205.


pdgid: S010PL
text:
AOKI 1994 measures xiP(mu) =-0.9996+-0.0030+-0.0048.  The above limit is obtained by summing the statistical and systematic errors in quadrature, normalizing to the physically significant region (|xiP(mu)|<1) and assuming that xi=1, its maximum value.


pdgid: S010AFB
text:
CORTINA-GIL 2022A measured the asymmetry A(FB) = 0.0+-0.7E-2. The quoted 90%  C.L. was obtained via private communication and also presented at the Moriond 2023 conference. The  authors will publish this limit in an addendum to the publication.


pdgid: S011AT
text:
ANGELOPOULOS 1998E measures the asymmetry A(T)= [G(Kbar0(t=0) --> e+ pi- nu(t=tau)) - G(K(t=0) --> e- pi+ nubar(t=tau))]/[G(Kbar0(t=0) --> e+ pi- nu(t=tau)) + G(K(t=0) --> e- pi+ nubar(t=tau))] as a function of the neutral-kaon eigentimetau.  The initial strangeness of the neutral kaon is tagged by the charge of the accompanying charged kaon in the reactions p pbar --> K- pi+ K0 and p pbar --> K+ pi- Kbar0.  The strangeness at the time of the decay is tagged by the lepton charge.  The reported result is the average value of A(T) over the interval 1tau(s)<tau<20tau(s). From this value of A(T) ANGELOPOULOS 2001B, assuming CPT invariance in the e pi nu decay amplitude, determine the T-violating as DeltaS=DeltaS conserving parameter (for its definition, see Review below) 4Re(epsilon) = 6.2+-1.4+-1.0E-3.


pdgid: S011REP
text:
AMBROSINO 2006H uses Bell-Steinberger relations with the following measurements: B(KL --> pi+ pi-) in AMBROSINO 2006F, B(KS --> pi0 pi0 pi0) in AMBROSINO 2005B, the K(S)0-semileptonic charge asymmetry in AMBROSINO 2006E, and K0-semileptonic results in ANGELOPOULOS 1998F.


pdgid: S011REP
text:
LAI 2005A values are obtained through unitarity (Bell-Steinberger relations), improving determination of eta(000) and combining other data from PDG 2004 and APOSTOLAKIS 1999B.


pdgid: S011DRE
text:
ANGELOPOULOS 1998F use DeltaS=DeltaQ. If DeltaS=DeltaQ is not assumed, they find Redelta=3.0+-3.3+-0.6E-4.


pdgid: S011YRE
text:
They use the PDG 2004 for the K(L)0 semileptonic charge asymmetry and PDG 2004 (CP review,  CPT NOT  ASSUMED) for Re(epsilon).


pdgid: S011XRM
text:
Uses PDG 2004 for the K(L)0 semileptonic charge asymmetry and Re(delta) from CPLEAR, ANGELOPOULOS 1998F.


pdgid: S011DGM
text:
ANGELOPOULOS 1999B assumes only unitarity and combines CPLEAR with other results. Correlated with (mass(K0)-mass(Kbar0))/mass(average) with a correlation coefficient of -0.95.


pdgid: S011XRP
text:
Result obtained from the measurement Gamma(K0S --> pi e nu) / Gamma(K0L --> pi e nu) = 0.993+-0.34, neglecting possible CPT non-invariance and using PDG 2006 values of B(K0L --> pi e nu) = 0.4053+-0.0015, meanlife(L) = 5.114+-0.021E-8 s and meanlife(S) = 0.8958+-0.0005E-10s.


pdgid: S011XRP
text:
Re(x(+)) can be shown to be equal to the following combination of rates:  Re(x(+)) = 1/2  Gamma(KS --> pi e nu) - Gamma(KL --> pi e nu)/Gamma(KS --> pi e nu) + Gamma(KL --> pi e nu)  which is valid up to first order in terms violating CPT and/or the Delta(S) = Delta(Q) rule.


pdgid: S012T
text:
The two ABOUZAID 2011 values use the same full KTeV dataset from 1996, 1997, and 1999.  The first enters the ''assuming CPT'' fit and the second enters the ''not assuming CPT'' fit.


pdgid: S012T
text:
ABOUZAID 2011 fit has Delta(m), tau_{{s}}, phi_{{epsilon}}, Re(epsilon^'/epsilon), and Im(epsilon^'/epsilon) as free parameters. See Im(epsilon^'/epsilon) in the ''K(L)0 CP violation'' section for correlation information.


pdgid: S012T
text:
ABOUZAID 2011 fit has Delta(m) and tau_{{s}} free but constrains phi_{{epsilon}} to the Superweak value, i.e. assumes CPT.  This tau_{{s}} value is correlated with their Delta(m) = mass(K(L)0)-mass(K(S)0) measurement in the K(L)0 listings.  The correlation coefficient rho(tau_{{s}}, Delta(m)) = -0.670.


pdgid: S012T
text:
is correlated with their Delta(m) = mass(K(L)0)-mass(K(S)0) measurement in the K(L)0 listings.  The correlation coefficient rho(tau(s),Delta(m)) = -0.396. Superseded by ABOUZAID 2011.


pdgid: S012T
text:
This ALAVI-HARATI 2003 fit has Delta(m), phi(+-), and tau(K_{{S}}) free. See phi(+-) in the ``K_{{L}} CP violation'' section for correlation information. Superseded by ABOUZAID 2011.


pdgid: S012T
text:
CARITHERS 1975   measures tau_{{s}} = ( 0.8913+-0.0032 )  -  0.238 [ Delta(m)- 0.5348 ]  . We have adjusted the measurement to use our best values of   ( Delta(m) = 0.5293+-0.0009 )  . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S012T
text:
HILL 1968 has been changed by the authors from the published value (0.865+-0.009) because of a correction in the shift due to eta(+-).


pdgid: S012T
text:
Pre-1971 experiments are excluded from the average because of disagreement with later more precise experiments.


pdgid: S012W1
text:
AKHMETSHIN 1999 is from a measured branching ratio B(K0S --> pi e nu_e)= 7.2+-1.4E-4 and tau(K(S)0)= 0.8934+-0.0008E-10s. Not independent of measured branching ratio.


pdgid: S012W1
text:
PDG 1998 from K(L)0 measurements, assuming that DeltaS=DeltaQ in K0 decay so that Gamma(K0S --> pi+- e-+ nu_e)= Gamma(K0L --> pi+- e-+ nu_e).


pdgid: S012W2
text:
PDG 1998 from K(L)0 measurements, assuming that DeltaS=DeltaQ in K0 decay so that Gamma(K0S --> pi+- mu-+ nu_mu)= Gamma(K0L --> pi+- mu-+ nu_mu).


pdgid: S012R3
text:
This result combines AMBROSINO 2006C KLOE 2001-02 data  with ALOISIO 2002B KLOE 2000 data. K0S --> pi+ pi- fully inclusive.


pdgid: S012R8
text:
BATLEY 2005 is obtained by measuring  the interference parameters in  K_{{S}}, K_L --> pi+ pi- pi0: Re(lambda) = 0.038+-0.008+-0.006 and Im(lambda) = -0.013+-0.005+-0.004; the correlation coeff. between Re(lambda) and  Im(lambda) is 0.66 (statistical only).


pdgid: S012R8
text:
ADLER 1997B find the CP-conserving parameters Re(lambda) = 28+-7+-3E-3, Im(lambda) = -10+-8+-2E-3. They estimate B(K0S --> pi+ pi- pi0) from Re(lambda) and the K(L)0 decay parameters. See also ANGELOPOULOS 1998C.


pdgid: S012R8
text:
ZOU 1996 is from the the measured quantities |rho(+-0)| = 0.039+0.009-0.006+-0.005 and phi(rho) = (-9+-18)degrees.


pdgid: S012R8
text:
ADLER 1996E is from the measured quantities Re(lambda) = 0.036+-0.010+0.002-0.003 and Im(lambda) consistent with zero. Note that the quantity lambda is the same as rho(+-0) used in other footnotes.


pdgid: S012R8
text:
THOMSON 1994 calculates this branching ratio from their measurements |rho(+-0)| = 0.035+0.019-0.011+-0.004 and phi(rho) = (-59+-48)degrees where |rho(+-0)|e**iphi(rho) = A(K0S --> pi+ pi- pi0, I = 2)/A(K0L --> pi+ pi- pi0).


pdgid: S012R5
text:
BOBISUT 1974 not included in average because p(gamma) cut differs. Estimates direct emission contribution to be 0.5 or less, CL = 95%.


pdgid: S012R14
text:
Also a limit on the absolute value of the interference between bremsstrahlung and E1 transition is given :  <4E-7 at 90% C.L.


pdgid: S012R14
text:
BATLEY 2011   reports [G(K0S --> pi+ pi- e+ e-)/G(total)] / [B(K0L --> pi+ pi- pi0)] / [B(pi0 --> e+ e- gamma)] = 3.28+-0.06+-0.04E-2 which we multiply by our best values B(K0L --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 12.54+-0.05E-2, B(pi0 --> e+ e- gamma) = 1.174+-0.035E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S012R14
text:
Uses normalization BR(K_L --> pi+ pi- pi0)*BR(pi0 --> e+ e-) = 1.505+-0.047E-3 from our 2000 Edition.


pdgid: S012R7
text:
AMBROSINO 2008C  reports 2.26+-0.12+-0.06E-6 from a measurement of [G(K0S --> gamma gamma)/G(total)] * [B(K0S --> pi0 pi0)] assuming B(K0S --> pi0 pi0) = 30.69+-0.05E-2.


pdgid: S012R7
text:
LAI 2003   reports [G(K0S --> gamma gamma)/G(total)] / [B(K0S --> pi0 pi0)] = 8.84+-0.18+-0.10E-6 which we multiply by our best value B(K0S --> pi0 pi0) = 30.69+-0.05E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S012R7
text:
BARR 1995B quotes this as the combined BARR 1995B + BURKHARDT 1987 result after rescaling BURKHARDT 1987 to use same branching ratios and lifetimes as BARR 1995B.


pdgid: S012R13
text:
Reconstructed from K0 (Kbar0)(t) pi e nu distributions using PDG values of  B(KL --> pi e nu) = 0.4053+-0.0015, meanlife(L) = 5.114+-0.021E-8 s  and meanlife(S) = 0.8958+-0.0005E-10 s.


pdgid: S012R13
text:
Obtained by imposing Sigma_{{i}}() B(KS --> i) = 1, where i runs over all the four branching ratios pi+ pi-, pi0 pi0, pi e nu, and pi mu nu. Input value of B(KS --> pi+ pi-) / B(KS --> pi0 pi0) from AMBROSINO 2006C is used. To derive  Gamma(KS --> pi+ mu nu) / Gamma(KS --> pi+ e nu), lepton universality is assumed, radiative corrections from ANDRE 2007 are used, and phase space integrals are taken from KTeV, ALEXOPOULOS 2004A. This branching fraction enters our fit via their Gamma(pi+- e-+ nu_e) / Gamma(pi+ pi-) branching ratio measurement.


pdgid: S012R18
text:
Value obtained by normalizing to the KLOE measurement B(K0S --> pi+ pi-) = (69.196+-0.051)%.  Also comparison with the PDG 2018 based derived value leads to a lepton flavor universality  test |V_{{us}} f_{{+}}(0)|**2(K0S --> pi mu nu)/|V_{{us}} f_{{+}}(0)|**2(K0S --> pi e nu)  = 0.975+-0.044.


pdgid: S012R17
text:
BABUSCI 2023 measured Gamma(K0S --> pi e nu)/Gamma(K0S --> pi+ pi-) = 1.0421+-0.0066+-0.0075E-3  based on data collected from 2004 to 2005. About 50k signal events were reconstructed from the  dataset corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 1.63 fb**-1. The quoted value is their  combination of this result with the previous measurement of AMBROSINO 2006E. The correlation  coefficient between the two measurements is 12%.


pdgid: S012R9
text:
BABUSCI 2013C uses 1.7 fb**-1 of data of phi --> K0L K0S decays with K(L)0 interaction in the calorimeter, collected from 2004 to 2005. No candidate events were found in the data with an expected background of 0.04+0.15-0.03 events. Upper limit is obtained by normalizing to  decays.


pdgid: S012R9
text:
LAI 2005A value is obtained from their bound on |eta(000)| (not assuming CPT) and B(KL --> 3pi0) = 0.211+-0.003, and PDG 2004 values for K(L)0 and K(S)0 lifetimes. If CPT is  assumed then B(KS --> 3pi0)(CPT) < 2.3E-7  at 90% CL


pdgid: S012R9
text:
ANGELOPOULOS 1998B is from Im(eta(000)) = -0.05+-0.12+-0.05, assuming Re(eta(000)) = Re(epsilon) = 1.635E-3 and using the value B(K0L --> pi0 pi0 pi0) = 0.2112+-0.0027.


pdgid: S012R11
text:
AAIJ 2020AE uses 8.6 fb**-1 of LHCb data from 2011 to 2012 and 2016 to 2018.  The result utilizes the normalization mode branching fraction B(K0S --> pi+ pi-) = 69.20+-0.05E-2 from  PDG 2018. Supersedes AAIJ 2017BQ.


pdgid: S012R11
text:
AAIJ 2017BQ uses 3.0 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 and 8 TeV. The result  utilizes the normalization mode branching fraction B(K0S --> pi+ pi-) = 69.20+-0.05E-2  from PDG 2016. Supersedes AAIJ 2013G.


pdgid: S012R11
text:
AAIJ 2013G uses 1.0 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV. They obtained B(K0S --> mu+ mu-) < 11E-9 at 95% C.L.


pdgid: S012R12
text:
AMBROSINO 2009A  reports <0.09E-7 from a measurement of [G(K0S --> e+ e-)/G(total)] / [B(K0S --> pi+ pi-)] assuming B(K0S --> pi+ pi-) = 69.20+-0.05E-2.


pdgid: S012R10
text:
BATLEY 2003 extrapolate also to the full kinematical region using a constant form factor and a vector matrix element. The resulting branching ratio is 5.8+2.9-2.4E-9.


pdgid: S012R16
text:
Background estimate is 0.22+0.18-0.11 events. Branching ratio assumes a vector matrix element and unit form factor.


pdgid: S012AS
text:
ANASTASI 2018A result is a combination of the new measurement and AMBROSINO 2006E. The  new ANASTASI 2018A measurement using data collected from 2004 -- 2005, which  corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 1.63 fb**-1 is A(S)=-4.9+-5.7+-2.6E-3.


pdgid: S012ET+
text:
BARMIN 1985 find Re(eta(+-0)) = (0.05+-0.17) and Im(eta(+-0)) = (0.15+-0.33). Includes events of BALDO-CEOLIN 1975.


pdgid: S012E+
text:
The ADLER 1996D fit also yields Re(eta(+-0)) = 0.006+-0.013+-0.001 with a correlation +0.66 between real and imaginary parts.  Their results correspond to |eta(+-0)|<0.037 with 90% CL.


pdgid: S012E+
text:
ZOU 1994 use theoretical constraint Re(eta(+-0)) = Re(epsilon) = 0.0016. Without this constraint they find Im(eta(+-0)) = 0.019+-0.061 and Re(eta(+-0)) = 0.019+-0.027.


pdgid: S012ET0
text:
BARMIN 1983 find Re(eta(000)) = (-0.08+-0.18) and Im(eta(000)) = (-0.05+-0.27). Assuming CPT invariance they obtain the limit quoted above.


pdgid: S012ET0
text:
GJESDAL 1974B uses K2pi, K_{{mu3}}, and K_{{e3}} decay results, unitarity, and CPT.  Calculates |(eta(000))| = 0.26+-0.20.  We convert to upper limit.


pdgid: S012E0
text:
LAI 2005A assumes Re(eta(000))=Re(epsilon)=1.66E-3. The equivalent limit is |eta(000)|{}(CPT)<0.025 at 90% CL Without assuming CPT invariance, they obtain Re(eta(000))=-0.002+-0.011+-0.015 and Im(eta(000))=-0.003+-0.013+-0.017 with a statistical correlation coefficient of 0.77 and an overall correlation coefficient of 0.57 between imaginary and real part. The equivalent limit is |eta(000)|<0.045 at 90% CL


pdgid: S012E0
text:
ANGELOPOULOS 1998B assumes Re(eta(000)) = Re(epsilon) = 1.635E-3.  Without assuming CPT invariance, they obtain Re(eta(000)) = 0.18+-0.14+-0.06 and Im(eta(000)) = 0.15+-0.20+-0.03.


pdgid: S013D
text:
The two ABOUZAID 2011 values use the same data. The first enters the ''assuming CPT'' fit and the second enters the ''not assuming CPT'' fit.


pdgid: S013D
text:
ABOUZAID 2011 fit has Delta(m) and tau_{{s}} free but constrains phi_{{epsilon}} to the Superweak value, i.e. assumes CPT.  See ''K(S)0 Mean Life'' section for correlation information.


pdgid: S013D
text:
Fits Delta(m) and phi(+-) simultaneously. GIBBONS 1993C systematic error is from B.Winstein via private communication. 20 -- 160 GeV K beams.


pdgid: S013D
text:
GIBBONS 1993 value assume phi(+-) = phi(00) = phi(SW) = (43.7+-0.2)degree, i.e. assumes CPT. 20 -- 160 GeV K beams.


pdgid: S013D
text:
These two experiments have a common systematic error due to the uncertainty in the momentum scale, as pointed out in WAHL 1989.


pdgid: S013D
text:
ALAVI-HARATI 2003 fit Delta(m) and meanlife(K(S)0) simultaneously. phi(+-) is constrained to the Superweak value, i.e. CPT is assumed. See ``K(S)0 Mean Life'' section for correlation information. Superseded by ABOUZAID 2011.


pdgid: S013D
text:
ALAVI-HARATI 2003 fit Delta(m), phi(+-), and tau(K_{{S}}) simultaneously. See phi(+-) in the ``K_{{L}} CP violation'' section for correlation information. Superseded by ABOUZAID 2011.


pdgid: S013D
text:
ADLER 1996C is the result of a fit which includes nearly the same data as entered into the ``OURFIT'' value above.


pdgid: S013T
text:
AMBROSINO 2006 uses phi --> K_L K_S with K_{{L}} tagged by K_S --> pi+ pi-. The four major K_{{L}} BR's are measured, the small remainder (pi+ pi-,pi0 pi0,gamma gamma) is taken from PDG 2004. This KLOE K_{{L}} lifetime is obtained by imposing Sum(i) B(i) = 1. The correlation matrix among the four measured K_{{L}} BR's and this K_L lifetime is         These correlations are taken into account in our fit. The average of this KLOE mean life measurement and the independent KLOE measurement in AMBROSINO 2005C is 5.084+-0.023E-8 s.


pdgid: S013R57
text:
There are correlations between these five KLOE  measurements:  B(K_L --> pi e nu), B(K_L --> pi mu nu), B(K_L --> 3pi0), B(K_L --> pi+ pi- pi0), and meanlife(K_{{L}}) measured in  AMBROSINO 2006. See the footnote  for the meanlife(K_{{L}}) measurement for the correlation matrix.


pdgid: S013R57
text:
ALEXOPOULOS 2004 constrains Sum(i) B(i) = 0.9993 for the six major  K_{{L}} branching fractions. The correlations among these branching fractions are taken into account in our fit. The correlation matrix is


pdgid: S013R58
text:
For correlations with other ALEXOPOULOS 2004 measurements, see the footnote with their B(K_L --> pi e nu) measurement.


pdgid: S013R62
text:
ABOUZAID 2007C  reports [G(K0L --> pi+- e-+ nu e+ e-)/G(K0L --> pi+ pi- pi0)] / [B(pi0 --> e+ e- gamma)] = 8.54+-0.07+-0.13E-3 which we multiply by our best value B(pi0 --> e+ e- gamma) = 1.174+-0.035E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S013R45
text:
We exclude these B(K_L --> 3pi0) measurements from our fit because the authors have constrained K_{{L}} branching fractions to sum to one. It enters our fit via the other measurements from the experiment and their correlations, along with our constraint that the fitted branching fractions sum to one.


pdgid: S013R55
text:
The LAI 2007 central value of 4.835E-3 has been reduced by 0.19% to 4.826E-3 to subtract the contribution from the direct emission mode KL --> pi+ pi- gamma(DE).


pdgid: S013R59
text:
Fully inclusive. Taking B(KL --> pi mu nu) from KLOE, AMBROSINO 2006,  B(KL --> pi+ pi- + pi+ pi- gamma(DE)) = 1.963+-0.012+-0.017E-3 is obtained.


pdgid: S013R20
text:
Old experiments excluded from fit.  See subsection on eta(+-) in section on ``PARAMETERS FOR K0L --> 2pi DECAY'' below for average eta(+-) of these experiments and for note on discrepancy.


pdgid: S013R9
text:
From same data as G(K0L --> pi+ pi-)/G(K0L --> pi+ pi- pi0) MESSNER 1973, but with different normalization.


pdgid: S013R25
text:
Also measured cut E(gamma)***>10 MeV, theta(e gamma)***>0degree 14221 evts: Gamma(pi+- e-+ nu_e gamma) / Gamma(pi+- e-+ nu_e) = (4.942+-0.062)%.


pdgid: S013R49
text:
Also measured cut E(gamma)***>10 MeV, 1385 evts: Gamma(pi+- mu-+ nu_mu gamma) / Gamma(pi+- mu-+ nu_mu) = (0.530+-0.014+-0.012)%.


pdgid: S013R12
text:
CARROLL 1980B quotes B(pi+ pi- gamma) using normalization  B(pi+ pi- pi0) = 0.1239. We divide by this value to obtain their measured Gamma(pi+ pi- gamma) / Gamma(pi+ pi- pi0).


pdgid: S013R26
text:
ABOUZAID 2008   reports 1.29+-0.03+-0.05E-6 from a measurement of [G(K0L --> pi0 2gamma)/G(total)] / [B(K0L --> pi0 pi0)] assuming B(K0L --> pi0 pi0) = 8.69+-0.04E-4, which we rescale to our best value B(K0L --> pi0 pi0) = 8.64+-0.06E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S013R26
text:
LAI 2002B  reports [G(K0L --> pi0 2gamma)/G(total)] / [B(K0L --> pi0 pi0)] = 1.467+-0.032+-0.032E-3 which we multiply by our best value B(K0L --> pi0 pi0) = 8.64+-0.06E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S013R26
text:
ALAVI-HARATI 1999B finds that Gamma(pi0 2 gamma, mass(gamma gamma)<240 MeV))  / Gamma(pi0 2 gamma) = (17.3+-1.3+-1.5)%. Superseded by ABOUZAID 2008.


pdgid: S013R51
text:
ABOUZAID 2007D includes 1997 (ALAVI-HARATI 2001E) and 1999 data. It measures the ratio  of B(KL --> pi0 gamma e+ e-) / B(KL --> pi0 pi_D()0), where pi_{{D}}()0 is the Dalitz  decaying pi0, and uses PDG 2006 values B(KL --> pi0 pi0) = 8.69+-0.04E-4, and B(pi_D()0 --> e+ e- gamma) = 1.198+-0.032E-2. Supersedes ALAVI-HARATI 2001E result.


pdgid: S013R8
text:
This value uses (eta(00)/eta(+-))**2 = 1.05+-0.14.  In general, G(K0L --> 2gamma)/G(total) = [4.32+-0.55E-4]*[(eta(00)/eta(+-))**2].


pdgid: S013R8
text:
Assumes regeneration amplitude in copper at 2 GeV is 22 mb.  To evaluate for a given regeneration amplitude and error, multiply by (regeneration amplitude/22mb)**2.


pdgid: S013R44
text:
TUNG 2011 reports the result assuming parity violating interaction and using 2005 data (Run-II and III). Assuming parity conserving or phase space interaction, the 90% upper limits obtained are 7.5E-8 and 8.6E-8, respectively.


pdgid: S013R28
text:
For FANTI 1999B, the +-0.4 systematic error includes for uncertainties in the calculation, primarily uncertainties in the pi0 --> e+ e- gamma and K0L --> pi0 pi0 branching ratios, evaluated using our 1999 Web edition values.


pdgid: S013R61
text:
ABOUZAID 2007B  reports [G(K0L --> e+ e- gamma)/G(K0L --> 3pi0)] / [[3.0G(pi0 --> 2gamma)/G(total) * G(pi0 --> e+ e- gamma)/G(total)]] = 1.3302+-0.0046+-0.0103E-3 which we multiply by our best value [3.0G(pi0 --> 2gamma)/G(total) * ]G(pi0 --> e+ e- gamma)/G(total)] = 0.0348+-0.0010. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S013R22
text:
AKAGI 1995 gives this number multiplied by the PDG 1992 average for Gamma(K0L --> pi+ pi-)/Gamma(total).


pdgid: S013R22
text:
AKAGI 1991B give this number multiplied by the 1990 PDG average for Gamma(K0L --> pi+ pi-)/Gamma(total).


pdgid: S013R22
text:
HEINSON 1991 give Gamma(K0L --> mu mu)/Gamma(total). We divide out the Gamma(K0L --> pi+ pi-)/Gamma(total) PDG average which they used.


pdgid: S013R31
text:
LAI 2003C second error is 0.15(syst)+-0.10(norm) combined in quadrature. The normalization uses BR(K_L --> pi+ pi- pi0) * BR(pi0 --> e+ e-) = 1.505+-0.047E-3 from our 2000 Edition.


pdgid: S013R65
text:
ABOUZAID 2011A also reports B(K0L --> pi0 pi0 X0 --> pi0 pi0 mu+ mu-) < 1.0E-10 at 90% C.L., where the X()0 is a possible new neutral boson that was reported by PARK 2005 with a mass of 214.3+-0.5 MeV/c**2.


pdgid: S013R36
text:
LAI 2005B uses 1998 and 1999 data. Data are normalized to the observed events of KL --> pi+ pi- pi0  (pi0 into Dalitz pair) and PDG 2004 values are used for  B(KL --> pi+ pi- pi0) and B(pi0 --> e+ e- gamma). The systematic error includes a normalization error of +-0.10.


pdgid: S013R34
text:
LAI 2002B uses the absence of a signal in K0L --> pi0 gamma gamma with m(gamma gamma)<m(pi0) and their a(V) value to predict this value.


pdgid: S013R40
text:
AHN 2021 result is based on data collected in 2016, 2017 and 2018, which corresponds to  3.05E19 protons on target. A single event sensitivity of 7.20+-0.05+-0.66E-10 was  achieved with 3 candidate events observed and total 1.22+-0.26 background events.


pdgid: S013R40
text:
AHN 2019 result is based on data collected in 2015, which corresponds to 2.2E19 protons  on target. A single event sensitivity of 1.30+-0.01+-0.14E-9 was achieved with no candidate  events observed. An upper limit of < 2.4E-9 at the 90% C.L. for the K_L --> pi0 X0 decay  was also set, where X0 is an invisible particle with a mass of 135 MeV/c**2.


pdgid: S013R40
text:
AHN 2017 result is based on the first 100 hours of physics running in 2013. One candidate  event was observed with an expected background of 0.34+-0.16 events. An upper limit of  <3.7E-8 at the 90% C.L. for the K_L --> pi0 X0 decay was also set, where  X0 is an invisible particle with a mass of 135 MeV/c**2.


pdgid: S013R63
text:
Using 2005 Run-I data. OGATA 2011 also sets a limit on the K0L --> pi0 pi0 X --> invisible particles process: the limit on the branching fraction varied from 7.0E-7 to 4.0E-5 for the mass of X ranging from 50 to 200 MeV/c**2.


pdgid: S013R00
text:
SHIMIZU 2020 uses data collected from 2016 to 2018 at the J-PARC KOTO experiment. The single  event sensitivity is 7.1+-0.3+-1.6E-8. No candidate event was observed.


pdgid: S013GT0
text:
Quadratic dependence required by some experiments.  (See sections on ``QUADRATIC COEFFICIENT h'' and ``QUADRATIC COEFFICIENT k'' below.)  Correlations prevent us from averaging results of fits not including g, h, and k terms.


pdgid: S013GT0
text:
BISI 1974 value comes from quadratic fit with quad. term consistent with zero.  g error is thus larger than if linear fit were used.


pdgid: S013GT0
text:
BUCHANAN 1970 result revised by BUCHANAN 1975 to include radiative correlations and to use more reliable K(L)0 momentum spectrum of second experiment (had same beam).


pdgid: S013HT0
text:
Quadratic coefficients h and k required by some experiments.  (See section on ``QUADRATIC COEFFICIENT k'' below.)  Correlations prevent us from averaging results of fits not including g, h, and k terms.


pdgid: S013HTZ
text:
Result obtained using CI3pI model of CABIBBO 2005 to include pi pi rescattering effects. The systematic error includes an external error of 1.06E-3 from the parametrization input of  (a(0)-a(2)) mass(pi+) = 0.268+-0.017  from BATLEY 2006B.


pdgid: S013HTZ
text:
SOMALWAR 1992 chose mass(pi+) as normalization to make it compatible with the Particle Data Group K0L --> pi+ pi- pi0 definitions.


pdgid: S013L0
text:
BIRULEV 1981 gives dlambda(0)/dlambda(+) = -1.5, giving an unreasonably narrow error ellipse which dominates all other results.  We use dlambda(0)/dlambda(+) = 0.


pdgid: S013LPE
text:
We use AMBROSINO 2006D result in the fit not assuming mu -e universality. This result enters  the fit assuming mu -e universality via AMBROSINO 2007C measurement of lambda'(+) in K_{{mu3}}() decays. AMBROSINO 2006D gives a correlation -0.95 between their lambda'(+) and lambda''(+).


pdgid: S013LQE
text:
We use AMBROSINO 2006D result in the fit not assuming mu -e universality. This result enters  the fit assuming mu -e universality via AMBROSINO 2007C measurement of lambda''(+) in K_{{mu3}}() decays. AMBROSINO 2006D gives a correlation -0.95 between their lambda'(+) and lambda''(+).


pdgid: S013MSM
text:
LAI 2007A gives a correlation -0.47 between their M(mu,S) and M(mu,V) measurements,  not assuming mu-e universality.


pdgid: S013MSM
text:
ALEXOPOULOS 2004A gives a correlation -0.46 between their M(mu,S) and M(mu,V)  and  measurements, not assuming mu-e universality.


pdgid: S013MSM
text:
ALEXOPOULOS 2004A gives a correlation -0.40 between their M(mu,S) and M(mu,V)  and  measurements, assuming mu-e universality.


pdgid: S013LAM
text:
Obtained from a sample of 1.9 M K_{{e3}} and 1.5 M K_{{mu3}}.  The correlation between Lambda_{{+}}() and ln(C) is -0.269.


pdgid: S013LAM
text:
AMBROSINO 2007C results include 2M K_{{e3}} events from AMBROSINO 2006D. The correlation between Lambda_{{+}}() and ln(C) is -0.26.


pdgid: S013LCM
text:
AMBROSINO 2007C results include 2M K_{{e3}} events from AMBROSINO 2006D. We convert (Lambda_{{+}}(), Lambda_{{0}}()) to (Lambda_{{+}}(), ln(C)) parametrization using ln(C) = (Lambda_{{0}}() . 11.713 + 0.0398)+-0.0041, where the error is due to theory parametrization of the form factor. The correlation between Lambda_{{+}}() and ln(C) is -0.26.


pdgid: S013HA1
text:
Q**2= 2 GeV**2, t(0) = 0.49 (mass(K) - mass(pi))**2. Correlation between a(1) and a(2): rho(12) = -0.064.


pdgid: S013ALP
text:
ABOUZAID 2007B measures C . alpha(K^*) = -0.517+-0.030+-0.022.  We assume C = 2.5, as in all other measurements.


pdgid: S013A12
text:
ALAVI-HARATI 2001B fit gives chi^2/DOF = 38.8/27. Linear and quadratic fits give chi^2/DOF = 43.2/27 and 37.6/26 respectively.


pdgid: S013L3
text:
MAKOFF 1993 sign has been changed to negative to agree with the sign convention used in BATLEY 2004.


pdgid: S013A1
text:
PACIOTTI 1969 is a reanalysis of DORFAN 1967 and is corrected for mu+ mu- range difference in MCCARTHY 1972.


pdgid: S013E00
text:
CHOLLET 1970 gives |eta(00)| = (1.23+-0.24)*(regeneration amplitude, 2 GeV/c Cu)/10000mb. WOLFF 1971 gives |eta(00)| = (1.13+-0.12)*(regeneration amplitude, 2 GeV/c Cu)/10000mb. We compute both |eta(00)| values for (regeneration amplitude, 2 GeV/c Cu) = 24+-2mb. This regeneration amplitude results from averaging over FAISSNER 1969, extrapolated using optical-model calculations of Bohm et al., Physics Letters  27B 594 (1968) and the data of BALATS 1971.  (From H. Faissner, private communication).


pdgid: S013E+-
text:
Value obtained from the NA48 measurements of Gamma(KL --> pi+ pi-)/Gamma(KL --> pi e nu_e) and meanlife(K(S)0) and KLOE measurements of B(KS --> pi+ pi-) and meanlife(K(L)0). Gamma(KL --> pi+ pi-) is defined to include the inner bremsstrahlung component Gamma(KL --> pi+ pi- gamma (IB)) but exclude the direct emission component B(KS --> pi+ pi- (DE)).  Their |eta_{{+-}}()| value is not directly used in our fit, but enters the fit via their branching ratio and lifetime measurements.


pdgid: S013E+-
text:
AMBROSINO 2006F uses KLOE branching ratios and meanlife(L) together with meanlife(S) from PDG 2004. Their |eta(+-)| value is not directly used in our fit, but enters the fit via their branching ratio and lifetime measurements.


pdgid: S013E+-
text:
ALEXOPOULOS 2004 |eta(+-)| uses their KL --> pi pi branching fractions, tau_{{S}} = 0.8963+-0.0005E-10s from the average of KTeV and NA48 tau_{{S}} measurements, and assumes that Gamma(KS --> pi lepton nu_lepton) = Gamma(KL --> pi lepton nu_lepton) giving B(KS --> pi lepton nu_lepton) = 0.118%. Their eta(+-) is not directly used in our fit, but enters our fit via their branching ratio measurements.


pdgid: S013E+-
text:
APOSTOLAKIS 1999C report (2.264+-0.023+-0.026+9.1[tau(s)-0.8934])*10**-3. We evaluate for our 2006 best value tau(s)= 0.8958+-0.0005E-10s.


pdgid: S013E+-
text:
ADLER 1995B report (2.312+-0.043+-0.030 -1[Deltam-0.5274] +9.1[tau_{{s}}-0.8926])*10**-3. We evaluate for our 1996 best values Deltam = 0.5304+-0.0014E-10hbars**-1 and tau_{{s}} = 0.8927+-0.0009E-10s. Superseded by APOSTOLAKIS 1999C.


pdgid: S013ER
text:
This is the combined results from BARR 1993D and BURKHARDT 1988, taking into account a common systematic uncertainty of 0.0014.


pdgid: S013EPS
text:
The two ABOUZAID 2011 values use the same data. The fits are performed with and without CPT invariance requirement.


pdgid: S013EPS
text:
These values are derived from |eta(00)/eta(+-)| measurements. They enter the average in this section but enter the fit via the |eta(00)/eta(+-)| only.


pdgid: S013EPS
text:
This is the combined results from BARR 1993D and BURKHARDT 1988, taking into account their common systematic uncertainty.


pdgid: S013EPS
text:
We use ABOUZAID 2011 Re(epsilon^'/epsilon) value with CPT assumption in our fits for |eta(+-)|, |eta(00)|, and Re(epsilon^'/epsilon).


pdgid: S013F+-
text:
APOSTOLAKIS 1999C  measures phi(+-) = ( 43.19+-0.53+-0.28 )  +  300 [ Delta(m)- 0.5301 ]  . We have adjusted the measurement to use our best values of   ( Delta(m) = 0.5293+-0.0009 )  . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S013F+-
text:
SCHWINGENHEUER 1995   measures phi(+-) = ( 43.53+-0.76 )  +  173 [ Delta(m)- 0.5282 ] -  275 [ tau_{{s}}- 0.8926 ]  . We have adjusted the measurement to use our best values of   ( Delta(m) = 0.5293+-0.0009 )  ,  ( tau_{{s}} = 0.8954+-0.0004 )  . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S013F+-
text:
These experiments measure phi(+-)-phi_{{f}} and calculate the regeneration phase from the power law momentum dependence of the regeneration amplitude using analyticity and dispersion relations. SCHWINGENHEUER 1995 [GIBBONS 1993] includes a systematic error of 0.35degree [0.5degree] for uncertainties in their modeling of the regeneration amplitude.


pdgid: S013F+-
text:
GIBBONS 1993   measures phi(+-) = ( 42.21+-0.9 )  +  189 [ Delta(m)- 0.5257 ] -  460 [ tau_{{s}}- 0.8922 ]  . We have adjusted the measurement to use our best values of   ( Delta(m) = 0.5293+-0.0009 )  ,  ( tau_{{s}} = 0.8954+-0.0004 )  . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S013F+-
text:
This is actually reported in SCHWINGENHEUER 1995, footnote8. GIBBONS 1993 reports phi(+-) (42.2+-1.4)degrees. They measure phi(+)-phi(f) and calculate the regeneration phase phi(f) from the power law momentum dependence of the regeneration amplitude using analyticity.  An error of 0.6degrees is included for possible uncertainties in the regeneration phase.


pdgid: S013F+-
text:
CAROSI 1990   measures phi(+-) = ( 46.9+-1.4+-0.7 )  +  579 [ Delta(m)- 0.5351 ] +  303 [ tau_{{s}}- 0.8922 ]  . We have adjusted the measurement to use our best values of   ( Delta(m) = 0.5293+-0.0009 )  ,  ( tau_{{s}} = 0.8954+-0.0004 )  . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S013F+-
text:
GEWENIGER 1974B  measures phi(+-) = ( 49.4+-1.0 )  +  565 [ Delta(m)- 0.540 ]  . We have adjusted the measurement to use our best values of   ( Delta(m) = 0.5293+-0.0009 )  . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S013F+-
text:
ALAVI-HARATI 2003 phi(+-) is correlated with their Delta(m) = mass(K(L)0)-mass(K(S)0) and tau(K_{{S}}) measurements in the K(L)0 and K(S)0 sections respectively.  The correlation coefficients are rho(phi(+-),Delta(m))=+0.955, rho(phi(+-),tau(S))=-0.871, and rho(tau(S),Delta(m))=-0.840. CPT is not assumed. Uses scintillator Pb regenerator. Superseded by ABOUZAID 2011.


pdgid: S013F+-
text:
ADLER 1996C is the result of a fit which includes nearly the same data as entered into the ``OURFIT'' value in the 1996 edition of this Review (Physical Review  D54 1 (1996)).


pdgid: S013F+-
text:
ADLER 1996C  measures phi(+-) = ( 43.82+-0.41 )  +  339 [ Delta(m)- 0.5307 ] -  252 [ tau_{{s}}- 0.8922 ]  . We have adjusted the measurement to use our best values of   ( Delta(m) = 0.5293+-0.0009 )  ,  ( tau_{{s}} = 0.8954+-0.0004 )  . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S013F+-
text:
ADLER 1995B  measures phi(+-) = ( 42.7+-0.9+-0.6 )  +  316 [ Delta(m)- 0.5274 ] +  30 [ tau_{{s}}- 0.8926 ]  . We have adjusted the measurement to use our best values of   ( Delta(m) = 0.5293+-0.0009 )  ,  ( tau_{{s}} = 0.8954+-0.0004 )  . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S013F+-
text:
ADLER 1992B quote separately two systematic errors: +-0.4 from their experiment and +-1.0 degrees due to the uncertainty in the value of Delta(m).


pdgid: S013F+-
text:
CARITHERS 1975   measures phi(+-) = ( 45.5+-2.8 )  +  224 [ Delta(m)- 0.5348 ]  . We have adjusted the measurement to use our best values of   ( Delta(m) = 0.5293+-0.0009 )  . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S013FOO
text:
CAROSI 1990   measures phi(00) = ( 47.1+-2.1+-1.0 )  +  579 [ Delta(m)- 0.5351 ] +  252 [ tau_{{s}}- 0.8922 ]  . We have adjusted the measurement to use our best values of   ( Delta(m) = 0.5293+-0.0009 )  ,  ( tau_{{s}} = 0.8954+-0.0004 )  . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S013FOO
text:
ANGELOPOULOS 1998   measures phi(00) = ( 42.0+-5.6+-1.9 )  +  240 [ Delta(m)- 0.5307 ]  . We have adjusted the measurement to use our best values of   ( Delta(m) = 0.5293+-0.0009 )  . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S013FOO
text:
ADLER 1996B identified initial neutral kaon individually as being a K0 or a Kbar0.  The systematic uncertainty is +-1.5degree combined in quadrature with +-0.8degree due to Delta(m).


pdgid: S013EPH
text:
SUPERWEAK 2016   measures phi(epsilon) = ( 43.50258+-0.00021 )  +  54.1 [ Delta(m)- 0.5289 ] +  32.0 [ tau_{{s}}- 0.89564 ]  . We have adjusted the measurement to use our best values of   ( Delta(m) = 0.5293+-0.0009 )  ,  ( tau_{{s}} = 0.8954+-0.0004 )  . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S013EPH
text:
SUPERWEAK 2016 is a fake measurement used to impose the CPT or Superweak constraint phi(+-)= phi(SW) = tan**-1[2 Delta(m)/hbar ( tau_{{S}} tau_{{L}}/tau_{{L}} - tau_{{S}} )]. This ``measurement'' is linearized using values near the PDG 2004 edition values of Delta(m), tau_{{S}} and tau_{{L}}, and then adjusted to our current values as described in the following ``measurement''.


pdgid: S013EPH
text:
ABOUZAID 2011 uses the full KTeV dataset collected in 1996, 1997, and 1999.  See Im(epsilon^'/epsilon) section for correlation information.


pdgid: S013EPI
text:
ABOUZAID 2011 uses the full KTeV dataset collected in 1996, 1997, and 1999.  The fit has Delta(m), tau_{{s}}, phi_{{epsilon}}, Re(epsilon^'/epsilon), and Im(epsilon^'/epsilon) as free parameters.  The reported value of Im(epsilon^'/epsilon) = -17.20+-20.20E-4 rad. The correlation coefficients are rho(phi_{{epsilon}}, Delta(m)) = 0.828, rho(phi_{{epsilon}}, tau_{{s}}) = -0.765, rho(Delta(m), tau_{{s}}) = -0.858,  rho(Im(epsilon^'/epsilon), phi_{{epsilon}}) = -0.041, rho(Im(epsilon^'/epsilon), Delta(m)) = 0.026, rho(Im(epsilon^'/epsilon), tau_{{s}}) = -0.010.


pdgid: S013EPG
text:
RAMBERG 1993B limit on |epsilon'(+-gamma)|/epsilon assumes than any difference between eta(+-) and eta(+-gamma) is due to direct CP violation.


pdgid: S013IXI
text:
SANDWEISS 1973 value corrected from value quoted in their paper due to new value of Re(xi).  See footnote 4 of SCHMIDT 1979.


pdgid: S013DF
text:
SUPERWEAK 2016 is a fake experiment  to constrain phi(00)-phi(+-) to a small value as described in the note ``CP violation in K_{{L}} decays.''


pdgid: S013DF
text:
This SCHWINGENHEUER 1995 values is the combined result of SCHWINGENHEUER 1995 and GIBBONS 1993, accounting for correlated systematic errors.


pdgid: S013DF
text:
ALAVI-HARATI 2003 fit Re(epsilon'/epsilon), Im(epsilon'/epsilon), Delta(m), tau(S), and phi(+-) simultaneously, not assuming CPT. Phase difference is obtained from phi(00)-phi(+-)~~-3Im(epsilon'/epsilon) for small |epsilon'/epsilon|. Superseded by ABOUZAID 2011.


pdgid: S013DF
text:
GIBBONS 1993 give detailed dependence of systematic error on lifetime (see the section on the K(S)0 mean life) and mass difference (see the section on mass(K(L)0)-mass(K(S)0)).


pdgid: S013DF
text:
CAROSI 1990 is excluded from the fit because it it is not independent of phi(+-) and phi(00) values.


pdgid: S013DFS
text:
ALAVI-HARATI 2003 fit is the same as their phi(+-), tau(K_{{S}}), Delta(m) fit, except that the parameter phi(+-)-phi(SW) is used in place of phi.


pdgid: M174TMP
text:
Extracted employing pi K partial wave analysis from ESTABROOKS 1978 and ASTON 1988,  Roy-Steiner equations and once subtracted forward dispersion relations.


pdgid: M174TMP
text:
Reanalysis of ESTABROOKS 1978 and ASTON 1988 satisfying Forward Dispersion Relations  and using sequences of Pade approximants.


pdgid: M174TMP
text:
Supersedes BUGG 2006. Combined analysis of ASTON 1988, ABLIKIM 2006C, AITALA 2006,  and LINK 2009 using an s-dependent width with couplings to K pi and K eta^', and the  Adler zero near thresholds.


pdgid: M174TMP
text:
Reanalysis of ASTON 1988, AITALA 2002, and ABLIKIM 2006C using for the  kappa an s-dependent width with an Adler zero near threshold.


pdgid: M174TMP
text:
Using Roy-Steiner equations (ROY 1971) consistent with unitarity, analyticity and crossing  symmetry constraints.


pdgid: M174TMP
text:
From UChPT fitted to MERCER 1971, BINGHAM 1972 and ESTABROOKS 1978. Amplitude  shown to be consistent with data of ABLIKIM 2006C.


pdgid: M174TMP
text:
Reanalysis of ASTON 1988 using interfering Breit-Wigner amplitudes.  Extracted from  Breit-Wigner parameters.


pdgid: M174M
text:
Assuming a Gaussian source to the measured two-particle correlation function. Systematic error  dominates. For 0 -- 100% multiplicity class.


pdgid: M174M
text:
The Breit-Wigner parameters from a fit with seven intermediate resonances. The S-matrix pole position is  (764+-63+71-54) - i (306+-149+143-85) MeV.


pdgid: M174M
text:
A fit in the K_{{0}}^*(700) + K^*(892) + K^*(1410) model with mass and width of the K_{{0}}^*(700) from ABLIKIM 2006C well describes the left slope of the K0S pi- invariant mass spectrum in tau- --> K0S pi- nu_tau decay studied by EPIFANOV 2007. Averaged value from different parameterizations.


pdgid: M174M
text:
Not seen by KOPP 2001 using 7070 events of D0 --> K- pi+ pi0. LINK 2002E and LINK 2005I show clear evidence for a constant non-resonant scalar amplitude rather than K_{{0}}^*(700) in their high statistics analysis of D+ --> K- pi+ mu+ nu_mu.


pdgid: M174M
text:
AUBERT 2007T does not find evidence for the charged K_{{0}}^*(700) using 11k events of  D0 --> K- K+ pi0.


pdgid: M174W
text:
Statistical error only. A fit to the Dalitz plot including the K_{{0}}^*(700)+-, K^*(892)+-, and phi  resonances modeled as Breit-Wigners. A significant S-wave can be also modeled as a non-resonant contribution.


pdgid: M018M1
text:
From a Dalitz plot analysis in an isobar model with charged and neutral K^*(892) masses and  widths floating.


pdgid: M018MCT
text:
From the pole position of the K pi vector form factor using  EPIFANOV 2007  and constraints from K_{{l3}} decays in ANTONELLI 2010.


pdgid: M018MCT
text:
From the pole position of the K pi vector form factor in the complex s-plane and using EPIFANOV 2007 data.


pdgid: M018MCT
text:
Calculated by us from the shift by 4.7+-0.9 MeV (statistical uncertainty only) reported in BONVICINI 2002 with respect to the world average value from PDG 2000.


pdgid: M028M3
text:
Well described in the chiral unitary approach of GENG 2007 with two poles at  1195 and 1284MeV and widths of 246 and 146MeV, respectively.


pdgid: M028R2
text:
Assuming that decays are saturated by the K rho, K^*_0(1430) pi, K^*(892) pi, K omega decay modes and neglecting interference between them. The values B(omega --> pi+ pi-) = (1.53+0.11-0.13)% and B(K^*_0(1430) --> K pi) = (93+-10)% are used. Systematic uncertainties not estimated.


pdgid: M019M
text:
Using both eta --> gamma gamma and eta --> pi+ pi- pi0. From a likelihood scan in the presence of several interfering scalar-meson resonances with fixed width Gamma(K_{{0}}^*(1430)) = 210 MeV.


pdgid: M019M
text:
S-Matrix pole. Supersedes BUGG 2006. Combined analysis of ASTON 1988, ABLIKIM 2006C, AITALA 2006, and LINK 2009 using an s-dependent width with couplings to K pi and K eta^', and the Adler zero near thresholds.


pdgid: M019M
text:
S-matrix pole. Reanalysis of ASTON 1988, AITALA 2002, and ABLIKIM 2006C including the kappa with an s-dependent width and an Adler zero near threshold.


pdgid: M019M
text:
Uses a model for the background, without this background they get a mass 1340 MeV, where the phase shift passes 90degree.


pdgid: M019W
text:
Using both eta --> gamma gamma and eta --> pi+ pi- pi0. From a likelihood scan in the presence of several interfering scalar-meson resonances with fixed mass M(K_{{0}}^*(1430)) = 1435 MeV.


pdgid: M019R01
text:
Using both eta --> gamma gamma and eta --> pi+ pi- pi0. From a Dalitz analysis in the presence of several interfering scalar-meson resonances.


pdgid: M022M1
text:
From a partial wave amplitude analysis at sqrt(s) = 2.125 GeV which includes all the possible    intermediate states that match J**PC conservation in the subsequent two-body decay. The    intermediate states are parameterized with the relativistic Breit-Wigner functions. Statistical  error only.


pdgid: M022R10
text:
ASTON 1988B quote <0.0092 at CL=95%. We convert this to a central value and 1sigma error in order to be able to use it in our constrained fit.


pdgid: M099M
text:
One of two K_{{1}} states reported by AAIJ 2021E.  From an amplitude analysis of the decay   B+ --> J/psi phi K+ with a significance of 4.5 sigma.


pdgid: M095R02
text:
CHEN 2020A quotes the ratio Gamma(K^*(1680)- --> K- eta)/Gamma(K^*(1680)- --> K- pi0)  =0.11+-0.02+0.06-0.04+-0.04(B(PDG)) where the last uncertainty comes from  B(eta --> gamma gamma) = (39.41+-0.20)%. We divide it by 3 taking into account  that Gamma(K^*(1680)- --> K- pi0)/Gamma(K^*(1680)- --> ( K pi )**-) = 1/3.


pdgid: M095R01
text:
From an amplitude analysis of the decay D0 --> K- pi+ eta with a significance of 16  sigma. Not independent of the CHEN 2020A measurement of G(K^*(1680) --> K eta)/G(K^*(1680) --> K pi).


pdgid: M088M
text:
A subsequent amplitude analysis of B+ --> J/psi phi K+ by AAIJ 2021E did not confirm this  measurement.


pdgid: M104M
text:
A reanalysis by AAIJ 2021E using a larger data sample did not confirm this measurement, the  new result having a significance of only 1.6 sigma.


pdgid: S031M
text:
PERUZZI 1977 and SCHINDLER 1981 errors do not include the 0.13% uncertainty in the absolute SPEAR energy calibration.  TRILLING 1981 uses the high precision J/psi(1S) and psi(2S) measurements of ZHOLENTZ 1980 to determine this uncertainty and combines the PERUZZI 1977 and SCHINDLER 1981 results to obtain the value quoted.


pdgid: S031B93
text:
ABBIENDI 1999K uses the excess of right-sign over wrong-sign leptons opposite reconstructed D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+ decays in Z0 --> c cbar.


pdgid: S031R6
text:
ALBRECHT 1992F uses the excess of right-sign over wrong-sign leptons in a sample of events tagged by fully reconstructed D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+ decays.


pdgid: S031C3
text:
ABREU 2000O uses slow pions opposite fully reconstructed D^*(2010)+, D+, or D0 mesons as a signal of D^*(2010)- production.


pdgid: S031R5
text:
Using the D+ and D0 lifetimes, ASNER 2010 finds that the ratio of the D+ and D0 semileptonic widths is 0.985+-0.015+-0.024.


pdgid: S031R5
text:
Using the D+ and D0 lifetimes, ADAM 2006A finds that the ratio of the D+ and D0 inclusive e+ widths is 0.985+-0.028+-0.015, consistent with the isospin-invariance prediction of 1.


pdgid: S031R02
text:
ABLIKIM 2008L finds the ratio of D+ --> mu+ X and D0 --> mu+ X branching fractions to be 2.59+-0.70+-0.25, in accord with the ratio of D+ and D0 lifetimes, 2.54+-0.02.


pdgid: S031R3
text:
ABLIKIM 2006U reports B(D0 --> K0 X or Kbar0 X) = 60.5+-5.5+-3.3E-2 which  we take as twice the branching fraction for D+ --> K0S X.


pdgid: S031R3
text:
COFFMAN 1991 reports B(D+ --> K0 X or Kbar0 X) = 61.2+-6.5+-4.3E-2 which we  take as twice the branching fraction for D+ --> K0S X.


pdgid: S031R8
text:
ABLIKIM 2014F obtain |V(cd)|.f(D+) = (45.75+-1.20+-0.39) MeV, and using |V(cd)| = 0.22520+-0.00065 gets f(D+) = (203.2+-5.3+-1.8) MeV.


pdgid: S031R8
text:
EISENSTEIN 2008, using the D+ lifetime and assuming |V_(cd)| = |V_(us)|, gets f(D+) = (205.8+-8.5+-2.5) MeV from this measurement.


pdgid: S031R8
text:
ABLIKIM 2005D finds a background-subtracted 2.67+-1.74 D+ --> mu+ nu_mu events, and from this obtains f(D+) = 371+129-119+-25~MeV.


pdgid: S031R8
text:
BONVICINI 2004A finds eight events with an estimated background of one, and from the branching fraction obtains f(D+) = 202+-41+-17 MeV.


pdgid: S031R93
text:
The ABLIKIM 2005A result together with the D0 --> K- e+ nu_e branching fraction of ABLIKIM 2004C and Particle Data Group lifetimes gives Gamma(D0 --> K- e+ nu_e) / Gamma(D+ --> Kbar0 e+ nu_e) = 1.08+-0.22+-0.07; isospin invariance predicts the ratio is 1.0.


pdgid: S031R93
text:
ABLIKIM 2015AF report Gamma(D+ --> K_L e+ nu_e)/Gamma(total)  = (4.481+-0.027+-0.103)%.  See also the form-factor parameters near the end of this  D+ Listing.


pdgid: S031R93
text:
It also finds Gamma(D0 --> K- e+ nu_e) / Gamma(D+ --> Kbar0 e+ nu_e) = 1.06+-0.02+-0.03; isospin invariance predicts the ratio is 1.0.


pdgid: S031Q21
text:
Amplitude analysis with two components. ABLIKIM 2024CS reports a branching fraction B(D+ --> (K0S pi0)_S-wave e+ nu_e) =  5.41+-0.35+-0.37E-4.


pdgid: S031Q22
text:
Amplitude analysis with two components. ABLIKIM 2024CS reports a branching fraction B(D+ --> Kbar^*(892)0 e+ nu_e) =  4.97+-0.11+-0.12E-2.


pdgid: S031C15
text:
HUANG 2005B finds Gamma(D0 --> K^*()- e+ nu_e) / Gamma(D+ --> Kbar^*()0 e+ nu_e) = 0.98+-0.08+-0.04; isospin invariance predicts the ratio is 1.0.


pdgid: S031B51
text:
This LINK 2002J result includes the effects of an interference of a small S-wave K- pi+ amplitude with the dominant Kbar^*()0 amplitude.  (The interference effect is reported in LINK 2002E.)


pdgid: S031P44
text:
ABLIKIM 2019BH quotes B(D+ --> Kbar_1(1270)0 e+ nu_e) = 2.30+-0.26+0.18-0.21+-0.25E-3,  where the last uncertainty is due to B(Kbar_1(1270)0 --> K- pi+ pi0) = 0.467+-0.050.


pdgid: S031Q23
text:
ABLIKIM 2024CR reconstructs D+ --> K0S pi+ pi- e+ nu_e and assumes that all come from  Kbar_1()0 --> K0S pi+ pi- decays.


pdgid: S031C16
text:
It finds Gamma(D0 --> pi- e+ nu_e) / Gamma(D+ --> pi0 e+ nu_e) = 2.03+-0.14+-0.08; isospin invariance predicts the ratio is 2.0.


pdgid: S031P47
text:
ABLIKIM 2020T  reports 10.4+-1.0+-0.5E-4 from a measurement of [G(D+ --> eta mu+ nu_mu)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] assuming B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.41+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S031R95
text:
DOBBS 2013 finds Gamma(D0 --> rho- e+ nu_e) / 2 Gamma(D+ --> rho0 e+ nu_e) = 1.03+-0.09+0.08-0.02; isospin invariance predicts the ratio is 1.0.


pdgid: S031R95
text:
HUANG 2005B finds Gamma(D0 --> rho- e+ nu_e) / 2 Gamma(D+ --> rho0 e+ nu_e) = 1.2+0.4-0.3+-0.1; isospin invariance predicts the ratio is 1.0.


pdgid: S031B50
text:
Because the reconstruction efficiency for photons is low, this FRABETTI 1997 result also includes any D+ --> eta^' mu+ nu_mu --> gamma rho0 mu+ nu_mu events in the numerator.


pdgid: S031P52
text:
ABLIKIM 2020H  reports 17.7+-1.8+-1.1E-4 from a measurement of [G(D+ --> omega mu+ nu_mu)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] assuming B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.3+-0.6E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S031S12
text:
DOBBS 2007 and HE 2005 use single- and double-tagged events in an overall fit. DOBBS 2007 supersedes HE 2005.


pdgid: S031R01
text:
The difference of CLEO D+ --> K0S pi+ and K0L pi+ branching fractions over the sum (DOBBS 2007 and HE 2008) is +0.022+-0.016+-0.018.


pdgid: S031R19
text:
BALEST 1994 measures the ratio of D+ --> K- pi+ pi+ and D0 --> K- pi+ branching fractions to be 2.35+-0.16+-0.16 and uses their absolute measurement of the D0 --> K- pi+ fraction (AKERIB 1993).


pdgid: S031R19
text:
SCHINDLER 1981 (MARK-2) measures sigma(e+ e- --> psi(3770)) x branching fraction to be 0.38+-0.05nb. We use the MARK-3 (ADLER 1988C) value of sigma = 4.2+-0.6+-0.3nb.


pdgid: S031R49
text:
This LINK 2009 model-independent partial-wave analysis of the K- pi+ S-wave slices the K- pi+ mass range into 39 bins.


pdgid: S031R49
text:
The BONVICINI 2008A QMIPWA (quasi-model-independent partial-wave analysis) of the K- pi+ S-wave amplitude slices the K- pi+ mass range into 26 bins but keeps the Breit-Wigner Kbar_{{0}}^*(1430)0.


pdgid: S031R49
text:
This LINK 2007B fit uses a K matrix. The K- pi+ S-wave fit fraction given above breaks down into (207.3+-25.5+-12.4)% isospin-1/2 and (40.5+-9.6+-3.2)% isospin-3/2 -- with large interference between the two. The isospin-1/2 component includes the kappa (or Kbar_{{0}}^*(700)0) and Kbar_{{0}}^*(1430)0.


pdgid: S031P73
text:
ABLIKIM 2022U determines the ratio B(D+ --> K0S pi+ omega)/B(D0 --> K- pi+ omega)    =   0.21+-0.01+-0.01, in significant tension with statistical isospin model expectation  of 0.9.


pdgid: S031Q26
text:
Amplitude analysis with two components. The second and third uncertainties are model and  experimental systematic uncertainties, respectively.


pdgid: S031S17
text:
AAIJ 2023H parameterise the pi+ pi- S-wave using one complex number per bin in 50 bins  of pi+ pi- invariant mass.


pdgid: S031S17
text:
LINK 2004 borrows a K-matrix parametrization from ANISOVICH 2003 of the full pi-pi S-wave isoscalar scattering amplitude to describe the pi+ pi- S-wave component of the pi+ pi+ pi- state. The fit fraction given above is a sum over five f_{{0}}() mesons, the f_{{0}}(980), f_{{0}}(1300), f_{{0}}(1200-1600), f_{{0}}(1500), and f_{{0}}(1750). See LINK 2004 for details and discussion.


pdgid: S031P70
text:
ABLIKIM 2021AD value is a fit fraction from an amplitude analysis of D+ --> K+ K0S pi0  with four components. Reconstructs the K^*(892)+ from its K+ pi0 final state.


pdgid: S031P71
text:
ABLIKIM 2021AD value is a fit fraction from an amplitude analysis of D+ --> K+ K0S pi0  with four components. Reconstructs the Kbar^*(892)0 from its K0S pi0 final state.


pdgid: S031Q09
text:
ABLIKIM 2024CJ reports B(D+ --> K0S K^*(892)+) = 8.72+-0.28+-0.15E-3 from an  amplitude analysis of D+ --> K0S K0S pi+ with two modes, assuming that B(K^*(892)+ --> K0S pi+) =  1/3.


pdgid: S031P92
text:
ABLIKIM 2022BK report a 2.7 sigma significance for the observation of this decay and  assign an upper limit for this branching fraction of 5.4E-4 at 90% CL. In their  analysis, ABLIKIM 2022BK assume negligible interference between D+ --> K^*()+ pi0 --> K+ pi0 pi0  and the non-resonant decay to the same final state.


pdgid: S031P93
text:
ABLIKIM 2022BK report a 3.2 sigma significance for the observation of this decay  mode. In their analysis, ABLIKIM 2022BK assume negligible interference between D+ --> K^*()+ eta --> K+ eta pi0 and the  non-resonant decay to the same final state.


pdgid: S031P62
text:
ABLIKIM 2020Z subtracted the known branching fractions of D+ --> K+ eta, D+ --> K+ phi, and  D+ --> K+ omega to obtain an estimate of the non-resonant component (ignoring interference  effects and possible additional resonant contributions) B(D+ --> K+ pi+ pi- pi0  non-resonant) =  1.13+-0.08+-0.03E-3.


pdgid: S031P72
text:
ABLIKIM 2021BB result has subtracted the known branching fractions of D+ --> K+ eta,   D+ --> K+ phi, and D+ --> K+ omega resonances (ignoring interference effects). The result   including these components is measured to be B(D+ --> K+ pi+ pi- pi0) = 1.11+-0.12E-3,   where the uncertainty is statistical only.


pdgid: S031P72
text:
ABLIKIM 2020Z result has subtracted the known branching fractions of D+ --> K+ eta,   D+ --> K+ phi, and D+ --> K+ omega, ignoring interference effects. The result including   these components is measured to be 1.21+-0.08+-0.03E-3.


pdgid: S031P19
text:
Fit fraction from a Dalitz plot analysis of D+ --> K+ K+ K- decays. The last uncertainty is due  to the amplitude model.


pdgid: S031R53
text:
This RUBIN 2010 limit is for the e+ e- mass in the continuum away from the phi(1020). See the next data block.


pdgid: S031R54
text:
This ABAZOV 2008D limit is for the mu+ mu- mass in the continuum away from the phi(1020). See the next data block.


pdgid: S031A5
text:
KO 2012A finds that after subtracting the contribution due to K0-Kbar0 mixing, the CP asymmetry due to the change of charm is (-0.024+-0.094+-0.067)%, consistent with zero.


pdgid: S031A5
text:
LINK 2002B measures N(D+ --> K0S pi+)/N(D+ --> K- pi+ pi+), the ratio of numbers of events observed, and similarly for the D-.


pdgid: S031A12
text:
The last uncertainty is due to the uncertainty on the CP asymmetry of the control channel,   D+ --> phi pi+.


pdgid: S031A13
text:
The last uncertainty is due to the uncertainty on the CP asymmetry of the control channel,  D+ --> phi pi+.


pdgid: S031A15
text:
AAIJ 2014BD reports its result as A(CP)(D+- --> K0S pi+-) with CP-violation effects in the K0-Kbar0 system subtracted. It also measures A(CP)(D+- --> Kbar0 / K0 K+-) + A(CP)(D_s()+- --> Kbar0 / K0 pi+-) = (0.41+-0.49+-0.26)%.


pdgid: S031A6
text:
LINK 2002B measures N(D+ --> K0S K+)/N(D+ --> K0S pi+), the ratio of numbers of events observed, and similarly for the D-.


pdgid: S031A6
text:
LINK 2002B measures N(D+ --> K0S K+)/N(D+ --> K- pi+ pi+), the ratio of numbers of events observed, and similarly for the D-.


pdgid: S031A1
text:
This is the integrated CP asymmetry. LEES 2013F also searches for CP asymmetries in four regions of the Dalitz plots (two of which are listed below); in comparisons of binned D+ and D- Dalitz plots; in parametrized fits to those plots, including 2-body submodes; and in comparisons of Legendre-polynomial distributions for the K+ K- and K- pi+ systems.


pdgid: S031A1
text:
AUBERT 2005S measures N(D+ --> K+ K- pi+)/N(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+), the ratio of the numbers of events observed, and similarly for the D-.


pdgid: S031A1
text:
FRABETTI 1994I, AITALA 1998C, and LINK 2000B measure N(D+ --> K- K+ pi+)/N(D+ --> K- pi+ pi+), the ratio of numbers of events observed, and similarly for the D-.


pdgid: S031A1
text:
RUBIN 2008 performs a dedicated analysis of this decay mode on the same dataset, with slightly better precision. We therefore take it that BONVICINI 2014 does not supersede RUBIN 2008's A(CP) result.


pdgid: S031A2
text:
This LEES 2013F result is for the K-+ pi+- mass-squared between 0.4 and 1.0 GeV**2, and does not actually separate out the K^*().


pdgid: S031A2
text:
AUBERT 2005S measures N(D+ --> K+ Kbar^*()0)/N(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+), the ratio of the numbers of events observed, and similarly for the D-.


pdgid: S031A2
text:
FRABETTI 1994I and AITALA 1997B measure N(D+ --> K+ Kbar^*(892)0)/N(D+ --> K- pi+ pi+), the ratio of numbers of events observed, and similarly for the D-.


pdgid: S031A3
text:
This LEES 2013F result is for the K+ K- mass-squared less than 1.3 GeV**2 and the K-+ pi+- mass-squared above 1.0 GeV**2, and does not actually separate out the phi.


pdgid: S031A3
text:
AUBERT 2005S measures N(D+ --> phi pi+)/N(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+), the ratio of the numbers of events observed, and similarly for the D-.


pdgid: S031A3
text:
FRABETTI 1994I and AITALA 1997B measure N(D+ --> phi pi+)/N(D+ --> K- pi+ pi+), the ratio of numbers of events observed, and similarly for the D-.


pdgid: S031A4
text:
AITALA 1997B measure N(D+ --> pi+ pi- pi+)/N(D+ --> K- pi+ pi+), the ratio of numbers of events observed, and similarly for the D-.


pdgid: S031L01
text:
AAIJ 2014C uses binned and unbinned methods, and finds slightly better sensitivity with the former. We took the first value in the table of results for the binned method.


pdgid: S031L02
text:
AAIJ 2011G publishes results for several binning schemes. We picked the first value in their table of results.


pdgid: S031RVD
text:
Using PDG 2010 values of V_(cd) and lifetimes, DOBBS 2013 gets A(1)(0)  = 0.56+-0.01+0.02-0.03,A(2)(0) = 0.47+-0.06+-0.04, and V(0) =  0.84+-0.09+0.05-0.06.


pdgid: S031FRV
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011I finds the pole mass mass(A) = (2.63+-0.10+-0.13) GeV (mass(V) is fixed at 2 GeV).


pdgid: S031FRV
text:
LINK 2002L includes the effects of interference with an S-wave background. This much improves the goodness of fit, but does not much shift the values of the form factors.


pdgid: S031A29
text:
The amplitude model has 7 components, including a pi+ pi+- S-wave parametrised by one complex  number per bin in 50 bins of pi+ pi- invariant mass.


pdgid: S032M
text:
Obtained by analyzing CLEO-c data but not authored by the CLEO Collaboration. The largest source of error in the TOMARADZE 2014 value is from the uncertainties in the K- and K(S)0 masses. The systematic error given above is the addition in quadrature of +-0.022 +-0.053 MeV, where the second error is from those mass uncertainties.


pdgid: S032M
text:
The largest source of error in the LEES 2013S value is from the uncertainty of the K+ mass. The quoted systematic error is in fact +-0.043 + 3 (mass(K+) - 493.677), in MeV.


pdgid: S032D
text:
AAIJ 2023BC analysis of D0 --> K0S pi+ pi- from B --> D0 mu nu X events allows for  CP violation (none seen).


pdgid: S032D
text:
AAIJ 2019X D0 come from D^*()+ and Bbar --> D0 mu- X decays (and c.c.).  Measurement allows for CP violation (none seen).


pdgid: S032D
text:
The result was established with D0 from prompt and secondary D^*. Based on 5 fb**-1 of  data collected at sqrt(s) = 7, 8, 13 TeV. Assumes no CP violation. Reported x^'2 =  3.9+-2.7E-5 and y^' = 5.28+-0.52E-3, where x^' = x cos(delta) +  y sin(delta), y^' = y


pdgid: S032D
text:
Model-independent measurement of the charm mixing parameters in the decay D0 --> K0S pi+ pi-  using 1.0 fb^{-1} of LHCb data at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV.


pdgid: S032D
text:
Based on 976 fb**-1 of data collected at Y(nS) resonances. Assumes no CP violation. Reported x^'2() = 0.09+-0.22E-3 and y^' = 4.6+-3.4E-3, where x^' = xcos(delta) + ysin(delta), y^' = ycos(delta) - xsin(delta) and delta is the strong phase between D0 --> K+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K+ pi-.


pdgid: S032D
text:
The time-dependent Dalitz-plot analysis of D0 --> K0S pi+ pi- is emplored. Decay-time information and interference on the Dalitz plot are used to distinguish doubly Cabibbo-suppressed decays from mixing and to measure the relative phase between D0 --> K^*()+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K^*()+ pi-. This value allows CP violation and is sensitive to the sign of Delta(m).


pdgid: S032D
text:
Based on 9.6 fb**-1 of data collected at the Tevatron. Assumes no CP violation. Reported  x^'2 = 0.08+-0.18E-3 and y^' = 4.3+-4.3E-3,  where x^' = x  cos(delta) + y sin(delta), y^' = y cos(delta) - x sin(delta) and delta is the strong phase between the D0 --> K+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K+ pi-.


pdgid: S032D
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010D uses 540,800+-800 K0S pi+ pi- and 79,900+-300 K0S K+ K- events in a time-dependent amplitude analysis of the D0 and Dbar0 Dalitz plots. No evidence was found for CP violation, and the values here assume no such violation.


pdgid: S032D
text:
The result was established with D0 from prompt and secondary D^*. Based on 3 fb**-1 of  data collected at sqrt(s) = 7, 8 TeV. Assumes no CP violation. Reported x^'2 = 3.6+-4.3E-5  and y^' = 5.23+-0.84E-3, where x^' = x cos(delta) + y  sin(delta), y^' = y cos(delta) - x sin(delta) and  delta is the strong phase between the D0 --> K+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K+ pi-.


pdgid: S032D
text:
Based on 3 fb**-1 of data collected at sqrt(s) = 7, 8 TeV. Assumes no CP violation. Reported x^'2 = 5.5+-4.9E-4 and y^' = 4.8+-1.0E-3,  where x^' = x cos(delta) + y sin(delta), y^' = y cos(delta) - x sin(delta) and delta is the strong phase between the D0 --> K+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K+ pi-.


pdgid: S032D
text:
Based on 1 fb**-1 of data collected at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV in 2011. Assumes no CP violation.  Reported x^'2 = -0.9+-1.3E-4 and y^' = 7.2+-2.4E-3,  where x^' = x  cos(delta) + y sin(delta), y^' = y cos(delta) - x  sin(delta) and delta is the strong phase between the D0 --> K+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K+ pi-.


pdgid: S032D
text:
The AUBERT 2009AN values are inferred from the branching ratio G(D0 --> K+ pi- pi0  via Dbar0)/G(D0 --> K- pi+ pi0) given near the end of this Listings. Mixing is distinguished from DCS decays using decay-time information. Interference between mixing and DCS is allowed. The phase between D0 --> K+ pi- pi0 and Dbar0 --> K+ pi- pi0 is assumed to be small. The width difference here is y^'', which is not the same as y_{{CP}} in the note on D0--Dbar0 mixing.


pdgid: S032D
text:
LOWREY 2009 uses quantum correlations in e+ e- --> D0 Dbar0 at the psi(3770).  See below for coherence factors and average relative strong phases for both D0 --> K- pi+ pi0 and D0 --> K- pi- 2pi+. A fit that includes external measurements of charm mixing parameters gets Delta(m) = 2.34+-0.61E10 hbars**-1.


pdgid: S032D
text:
The ASNER 2005 and ZHANG 2007B values are from the time-dependent Dalitz-plot analysis of D0 --> K0S pi+ pi-. Decay-time information and interference on the Dalitz plot are used to distinguish doubly Cabibbo-suppressed decays from mixing and to measure the relative phase between D0 --> K^*()+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K^*()+ pi-. This value allows CP violation and is sensitive to the sign of Delta(m).


pdgid: S032D
text:
The AUBERT 2003Z, LI 2005A, and ZHANG 2006 limits are inferred from the D0-Dbar0 mixing ratio Gamma(K+ pi- (via Dbar0))/Gamma(K- pi+) given near the end of this D0 Listings.  Decay-time information is used to distinguish DCS decays from D0-Dbar0 mixing.  The limit allows interference between the DCS and mixing ratios, and also allows CP violation. AUBERT 2003Z assumes the strong phase between D0 --> K+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K+ pi- amplitudes is small; if an arbitrary phase is allowed, the limit degrades by 20%.  The LI 2005A and ZHANG 2006 limits are valid for an arbitrary strong phase.


pdgid: S032D
text:
This LINK 2005H limit is inferred from the D0-Dbar0 mixing ratio Gamma(K+ pi- (via Dbar0))/Gamma(K- pi+) given near the end of this D0 Listings.  Decay-time information is used to distinguish DCS decays from D0-Dbar0 mixing.  The limit allows interference between the DCS and mixing ratios, and also allows CP violation.   The strong phase between D0 --> K+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K+ pi- is assumed to be small. If an arbitrary relative strong phase is allowed, the limit degrades by 25%.


pdgid: S032D
text:
This GODANG 2000 limit is inferred from the D0-Dbar0 mixing ratio Gamma(K+ pi- (via Dbar0))/Gamma(K- pi+) given near the end of this D0 Listings.  Decay-time information is used to distinguish DCS decays from D0-Dbar0 mixing.  The limit allows interference between the DCS and mixing ratios, and also allows CP violation.   The strong phase between D0 --> K+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K+ pi- is assumed to be small. If an arbitrary relative strong phase is allowed, the limit degrades by a factor of two.


pdgid: S032D
text:
AITALA 1998 allows interference between the doubly Cabibbo-suppressed and mixing amplitudes, and also allows CP violation in this term, but assumes that A(D)=A(R)=0. See the note on ``D0-Dbar0 Mixing,'' above.


pdgid: S032D
text:
This limit is inferred from R(M) for f = K+ pi- and f = K+ pi- pi+ pi-. See the note on ``D0-Dbar0 Mixing,'' above. Decay-time information is used to distinguish doubly Cabibbo-suppressed decays from D0-Dbar0 mixing.


pdgid: S032D
text:
This limit is inferred from R(M) for f = K+ lepton- nubar_lepton. See the note on ``D0-Dbar0 Mixing,'' above.


pdgid: S032D
text:
ANJOS 1988C assumes that y = 0.  See the note on ``D0-Dbar0 Mixing,'' above. Without this assumption, the limit degrades by about a factor of two.


pdgid: S032DT
text:
AAIJ 2022O is the combination of the measurement in the D0 --> pi- pi+ channel and the  one in the D0 --> K- K+ channel, that are (1.314+-0.106+-0.032)% and (1.416+-0.060+-0.028)%  respectively, assuming fully correlated systematics except those related to peaking backgrounds.


pdgid: S032DT
text:
NAYAK 2020 reports 1.92+-1.82+-1.24+0.34-0.00E-2 where the last uncertainty is due  to possible presence of CP-even decays in the data sample. Extracts  y(CP)=(Gamma(CP+) - Gamma(CP-)) /  (Gamma(CP+) + Gamma(CP-)) in D0 --> KS omega versus Dbar0 --> KS omega, by  measuring the decay lifetime of D0 --> KS omega with omega --> pi+ pi- pi0 versus D0 --> K- pi+.  We list 2y(CP) = 2y (= DeltaGamma/Gamma) in the  absence of CP violation.


pdgid: S032DT
text:
Based on 3 fb**-1 of data collected at sqrt(s) = 7, 8 TeV. Measures the lifetime difference  between D0 --> K- K+ and D0 --> pi- pi+ (CPeven) decays and D0 --> K- pi+  (CPmixed) decays, or y(CP)=(Gamma(CP+) -  Gamma(CP-)) / (Gamma(CP+) + Gamma(CP-)). The D0 mesons are  required to originate from semimuonic decays of B mesons. We list 2y(CP)  = DeltaGamma/Gamma.


pdgid: S032DT
text:
AAIJ 2019X D0 come from D^*()+ and Bbar --> D0 mu- X decays (and c.c.) in p p  collisions at 7 and 8 TeV. Measurement allows for CP violation (none seen).


pdgid: S032DT
text:
The result was established with D0 from prompt and secondary D^*. Based on 5 fb**-1 of  data collected at sqrt(s) = 7, 8, 13 TeV. Assumes no CP violation. Reported x^'2 =  3.9+-2.7E-5 and y^' = 5.28+-0.52E-3, where x^' = x cos(delta) +  y sin(delta), y^' = y cos(delta) - x sin(delta) and  delta is the strong phase between the D0 --> K+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K+ pi-.


pdgid: S032DT
text:
An improved measurement of Dbar0-D0 mixing and a search for CP violation in  D0 decays to CP-even final states K+ K- and pi+ pi- using the final Belle data  sample of 976 fb**-1.


pdgid: S032DT
text:
Based on 9.6 fb**-1 of data collected at the Tevatron. Assumes no CP violation. Reported x^'2 = 0.08+-0.18E-3 and y^' = 4.3+-4.3E-3,  where x^' = x cos(delta) + y sin(delta), y^' = y cos(delta) - x sin(delta) and delta is the strong phase between the D0 --> K+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K+ pi-.


pdgid: S032DT
text:
Obtained y_{{CP}}() = (0.72+-0.18+-0.12)% based on three effective D0 lifetimes measured in  K-+ pi+-, K- K+, and pi- pi+. We list 2y_{{CP}}() = DeltaGamma/Gamma.


pdgid: S032DT
text:
Compared the lifetimes of D0 decay to the CP eigenstate K+ K- with D0 decay to pi+ K-.  The values here assume no CP violation.


pdgid: S032DT
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010D uses 540,800+-800 K0S pi+ pi- and 79,900+-300 K0S K+ K- events in a time-dependent amplitude analyses of the D0 and Dbar0 Dalitz plots. No evidence was found for CP violation, and the values here assume no such violation.


pdgid: S032DT
text:
ZUPANC 2009 uses a method based on measuring the mean decay time of D0 --> K0S K+ K- events for different K+ K- mass intervals.


pdgid: S032DT
text:
LINK 2000, AITALA 1999E, and ABE 2002I measure the lifetime difference between D0 --> K- K+ (CPeven) decays and D0 --> K- pi+ (CPmixed) decays, or y(CP)= [Gamma(CP+)-Gamma(CP-)]/[Gamma(CP+)+Gamma(CP-)]. We list 2y(CP)=DeltaGamma/Gamma.


pdgid: S032DT
text:
CSORNA 2002 measures the lifetime difference between D0 --> K- K+ and pi- pi+ (CPeven) decays and D0 --> K- pi+ (CPmixed) decays, or y(CP)= [Gamma(CP+)-Gamma(CP-)]/[Gamma(CP+)+Gamma(CP-)]. We list 2y(CP)=DeltaGamma/Gamma.


pdgid: S032DT
text:
Based on 1 fb**-1 of data collected at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV in 2011. Assumes no CP violation. Reported x^'2 = -0.9+-1.3E-4 and y^' = 7.2+-2.4E-3,  where x^' = x cos(delta) + y sin(delta), y^' = y cos(delta) - x sin(delta) and delta is the strong phase between the D0 --> K+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K+ pi-.


pdgid: S032DT
text:
This combines the y(CP) = (meanlife(K pi)/meanlife(K K))-1 using untagged K- pi+ and K- K+ events of AUBERT 2009AI with the disjoint y(CP) using tagged K- pi+, K- K+, and pi- pi+ events of AUBERT 2008U.


pdgid: S032DT
text:
LOWREY 2009 uses quantum correlations in e+ e- --> D0 Dbar0 at the psi(3770).  See below for coherence factors and average relative strong phases for both D0 --> K- pi+ pi0 and D0 --> K- pi- 2pi+. A fit that includes external measurements of charm mixing parameters gets 2y = 1.62+-0.32E-2.


pdgid: S032DT
text:
The GODANG 2000, AUBERT 2003Z, LINK 2005H, LI 2005A, ZHANG 2006, AUBERT 2007W, and AALTONEN 2008E limits are inferred from the D0-Dbar0 mixing ratio Gamma(K+ pi- (via Dbar0))/Gamma(K- pi+) given near the end of this D0 Listings.  Decay-time information is used to distinguish DCS decays from D0-Dbar0 mixing.  The limits allow interference between the DCS and mixing ratios, and all except AUBERT 2007W and AALTONEN 2008E also allow CP violation. The phase between D0 --> K+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K+ pi- is assumed to be small. This is a measurement of y^' and is not the same as the y(CP) of our note above on ``D0-Dbar0 Mixing.''


pdgid: S032DT
text:
STARIC 2007 compares the lifetimes of D0 decay to the CP eigenstates K+ K- and pi+ pi- with D0 decay to K- pi+.


pdgid: S032DT
text:
The ASNER 2005 and ZHANG 2007B values are from the time-dependent Dalitz-plot analysis of D0 --> K0S pi+ pi-. Decay-time information and interference on the Dalitz plot are used to distinguish doubly Cabibbo-suppressed decays from mixing and to measure the relative phase between D0 --> K^*()+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K^*()+ pi-. This limit allows CP violation.


pdgid: S032DT
text:
The ranges of AUBERT 2003Z, LINK 2005H, LI 2005A, and ZHANG 2006 measurements are for 95% confidence level.


pdgid: S032DT
text:
AUBERT 2003P measures Y== 2 tau0 / (tau+ + tau-) - 1, where tau0 is the D0 --> K- pi+ (and Dbar0 --> K+ pi-) lifetime, and tau+ and tau- are the D0 and Dbar0 lifetimes to CP-even states (here K- K+ and pi- pi+). In the limit of CP conservation, Y~=~y==DeltaGamma / 2 Gamma (we list 2y = DeltaGamma/Gamma). AUBERT 2003P also uses tau+-tau- to get DeltaY = -0.008+-0.006+-0.002.


pdgid: S032QP
text:
AAIJ 2019X measurement comes form analysis of D0 --> K0S pi+ pi- decays. D0 come from  D^*()+ and Bbar --> D0 mu- X decays (and c.c.) in p p  collisions at 7 and 8 TeV.


pdgid: S032QP
text:
Based on 5 fb**-1 of data collected at sqrt(s) = 7, 8, 13 TeV. Allowing for CP  violation, the direct CP violation in mixing is reported 1.00 < |q/p| < 1.35  at the 68.3% CL for the D0 --> K+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K+ pi-.


pdgid: S032QP
text:
The time-dependent Dalitz-plot analysis of D0 --> K0S pi+ pi- is employed. Decay-time information and interference on the Dalitz plot are used to distinguish doubly Cabibbo-suppressed decays from mixing and to measure the relative phase between D0 --> K^*()+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K^*()+ pi-. This value allows CP violation and is sensitive to the sign of Delta(m).


pdgid: S032QP
text:
Based on 3 fb**-1 of data collected at sqrt(s) = 7, 8 TeV. Allowing for CP violation, the direct CP violation in mixing is reported 0.75 < |q/p| < 1.24 at the  68.3% CL for the D0 --> K+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K+ pi-.


pdgid: S032QP
text:
The phase of p/q is (-14+16-18+-5)degree. The ZHANG 2007B value is from the time-dependent Dalitz-plot analysis of D0 --> K0S pi+ pi-. Decay-time information and interference on the Dalitz plot are used to distinguish doubly Cabibbo-suppressed decays from mixing and to measure the relative phase between D0 --> K^*()+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K^*()+ pi-. This value allows CP violation.


pdgid: S032AG
text:
Requires D0 to originate from D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+. Measures the parameter  DeltaY_{{f}} ~= -A_{{Gamma}}^f up to 1% corrections from y_{{CP}}^f.


pdgid: S032AG
text:
A combination of D0 --> K+ K- and D0 --> pi+ pi- from AAIJ 2021AI, AAIJ 2020,  AAIJ 2017AK and AAIJ 2015AA


pdgid: S032AG
text:
Measured using D0 --> K+ K- decays, combines measurements with D0 either from partially  reconstructed semileptonic B hadron decays or from  D^*()+ --> D0 pi+.


pdgid: S032AG
text:
Measured using D0 --> pi+ pi- decays, combines measurements with D0 either from partially  reconstructed semileptonic B hadron decays or from  D^*()+ --> D0 pi+.


pdgid: S032AG
text:
Measured using D0 --> K+ K- decays, with D0 from partially reconstructed semileptonic B  hadron decays.


pdgid: S032AG
text:
Measured using D0 --> pi+ pi- decays, with D0 from partially reconstructed semileptonic  B hadron decays.


pdgid: S032D03
text:
AAIJ 2019X result comes form analysis of D0 --> K0S pi+ pi- events. D0 come from  D^*()+ and Bbar --> D0 mu- X decays (and c.c.) in p p  collisions at 7 and 8 TeV.


pdgid: S032D03
text:
PENG 2014 reports -0.10+-0.19+-0.05+0.05-0.07 value where the last uncertainty is  due to the amplitude model. We have added the systematic uncertainties in quadrature.


pdgid: S032DKP
text:
Uses quantum correlations in e+ e- --> D0 Dbar0 at the psi(3770) to measure the asymmetry   of the branching fraction of D0 --> K- pi+ in CP-odd and CP-even eigenstates to be   (13.2+-1.1+-0.7)% and (13.0+-1.2+-0.8)% when using the predominantly   CP-even tag D0 --> pi+ pi- pi0. A fit that includes external measurements of charm mixing   parameters finds the value quoted above.


pdgid: S032DKP
text:
Uses quantum correlations in e+ e- --> D0 Dbar0 at the psi(3770) to measure the asymmetry of the branching fraction of D0 --> K- pi+ in CP-odd and CP-even eigenstates to  be (12.7+-1.3+-0.7)%. A fit that includes external measurements of charm mixing  parameters finds the value quoted above.


pdgid: S032DKP
text:
Uses quantum correlations in e+ e- --> D0 Dbar0 at the psi(3770), where decay rates of CP-tagged K pi final states depend on the strong phases between the decays of D0 --> K+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K+ pi-. The measurements obtained sin(delta) = -0.01+-0.41+-0.04 and |delta| = (10+28-53+13-00)degree as well. A fit that includes external measurements of charm mixing parameters finds cos(delta) = 1.15+0.19-0.17+0.00-0.08, sin(delta) = 0.56+0.32-0.31+0.21-0.20, and |delta| = (18+11-17)degree.


pdgid: S032DKP
text:
ASNER 2008 uses quantum correlations in e+ e- --> D0 Dbar0 at the psi(3770), where decay rates of CP-tagged K pi final states depend on cos( delta) because of interfering amplitudes. The above measurement implies |delta| < 75degree with a confidence level of 95%. A fit that includes external measurements of charm mixing parameters finds cos( delta) =  1.10+-0.35+-0.07. See also the note on ``D0- Dbar0 Mixing'' p. 783 in our 2008 Review (PDG 2008).


pdgid: S032CF1
text:
Uses quantum correlations in e+ e- --> D0 Dbar0 at the psi(3770), where the decay rates of CP-tagged K- pi+ pi0 final states depend on R(K pi pi0) and delta**K pi pi0.


pdgid: S032CF1
text:
A combined fit with a recent LHCb D0 Dbar0 mixing results in AAIJ 2016F is also reported  to be 0.81+-0.06.


pdgid: S032CF1
text:
LOWREY 2009 uses quantum correlations in e+ e- --> D0 Dbar0 at the psi(3770), where the decay rates of CP-tagged K- pi+ pi0 final states depend on R(K pi pi0) and  delta**K pi pi0. A fit that includes external measurements of charm mixing parameters gets R(K pi pi0) = 0.84+-0.07.


pdgid: S032SP1
text:
A combined fit with a recent LHCB D0Dbar0 mixing results in AAIJ 2016F is also  reported to be 198+14-15 degree.


pdgid: S032SP1
text:
LOWREY 2009 uses quantum correlations in e+ e- --> D0 Dbar0 at the psi(3770), where the decay rates of CP-tagged K- pi+ pi0 final states depend on R(K pi pi0) and  delta**K pi pi0. A fit that includes external measurements of charm mixing parameters gets delta**K pi pi0 = (227+14-17)degrees.


pdgid: S032CF2
text:
Uses quantum correlations in e+ e- --> D0 Dbar0 at the psi(3770), where the decay rates of CP-tagged K- pi- 2pi+ final states depend on R(K 3pi) and delta**K 3pi.


pdgid: S032CF2
text:
A combined fit with a recent LHCB D0Dbar0 mixing results in AAIJ 2016F is also  reported, to be 0.43+0.17-0.13.


pdgid: S032CF2
text:
Calculated from amplitude models to  and  and cc.  Reports 0.458+-0.010+-0.012+-0.020 value where the 3rd uncertainty is the model uncertainty.  We combined both systematic uncertainties in quadrature. Because of the importance of model  independence in the practical use of the coherence factor, we do not include model-derived results  in the average.


pdgid: S032CF2
text:
LOWREY 2009 uses quantum correlations in e+ e- --> D0 Dbar0 at the psi(3770), where the decay rates of CP-tagged K- pi- 2pi+ final states depend on R(K 3pi) and  delta**K 3pi. A fit that includes external measurements of charm mixing parameters gets R(K 3pi) = 0.33+0.26-0.23.


pdgid: S032SP2
text:
A combined fit with a recent LHCb D0 Dbar0 mixing results in AAIJ 2016F is also reported  to be (128+28-17)degree.


pdgid: S032SP2
text:
LOWREY 2009 uses quantum correlations in e+ e- --> D0 Dbar0 at the psi(3770), where the decay rates of CP-tagged K- pi- 2pi+ final states depend on R(K 3pi) and  delta**K 3pi. A fit that includes external measurements of charm mixing parameters gets delta**K 3pi = (114+26-23)degrees.


pdgid: S032A82
text:
From a time-dependent analysis of D mixing in  D0 --> K+ pi- pi+ pi- . This result uses  external constraints on R(M)= 1/2 (x**2 + y**2). Without such constraints, AAIJ 2016F  measure 0.3+-1.8E-3, with a large correlation coefficient to R(M).


pdgid: S032CF3
text:
Uses quantum correlations in e+ e- --> D0 Dbar0 at the psi(3770), where the signal side D decays to K0S K pi and the tag-side D decays to K pi, K pi pi pi, K pi pi0, and 10 additional CP-even, CP-odd, and mixed CP modes involving K(S)0 or K(L)0.


pdgid: S032CF4
text:
Uses quantum correlations in e+ e- --> D0 Dbar0 at the psi(3770), where the signal side D decays to K0S K pi and the tag-side D decays to K pi, K pi pi pi, K pi pi0., and 10 additional CP-even, CP-odd, and mixed CP modes involving K(S)0 or K(L)0.


pdgid: S032R3
text:
ABLIKIM 2006U reports B(D0 --> K0 X or Kbar0 X) = 0.476+-0.048+-0.030  which we take as twice the branching fraction for D0 --> K0S X.


pdgid: S032R3
text:
COFFMAN 1991 reports B(D0 --> K0 X or Kbar0 X) = 0.455+-0.050+-0.032 which  we take as twice the branching fraction for D0 --> K0S X.


pdgid: S032R57
text:
The pi- e+ nu_e and K- e+ nu_e results of WIDHALM 2006 give |V(c d)/V(c s).f(+)**pi(0)/f(+)**K(0)|**2 = 0.042+-0.003+-0.003.


pdgid: S032R57
text:
DOBBS 2008 establishes |V(c d)/V(c s).f(+)**pi(0)/f(+)**K(0)| = 0.188+-0.008+-0.002 from the D+ and D0 decays to Kbar e+ nu_e and pi e+ nu_e.


pdgid: S032R66
text:
The event samples in this AUBERT 2007BG result include radiative photons. The D0 --> K- e+ nu_e form factor at q**2 = 0 is f(+)(0) = 0.727+-0.007+-0.005+-0.007.


pdgid: S032R66
text:
BEAN 1993C uses K- mu+ nu_mu as well as K- e+ nu_e events and makes a small  phase-space  adjustment to the number of the mu+ events to use them as e+ events. A pole mass of 2.00+-0.12+-0.18 GeV/c**2 is obtained from the q**2 dependence of the decay rate.


pdgid: S032R66
text:
CRAWFORD 1991B uses K- e+ nu_e and K- mu+ nu_mu candidates to measure a pole mass of 2.1+0.4-0.2+0.3-0.2 GeV/c**2 from the q**2 dependence of the decay rate.


pdgid: S032R66
text:
ANJOS 1989F measures a pole mass of 2.1+0.4-0.2+-0.2 GeV/c**2 from the q**2 dependence of the decay rate.


pdgid: S032B29
text:
FRABETTI 1995G extracts the ratio of form factors f(-)(0)/f(+)(0) = -1.3+3.6-3.4+-0.6, and measures a pole mass of 1.87+0.11-0.08+0.07-0.06 GeV/c**2 from the q**2 dependence of the decay rate.


pdgid: S032B81
text:
BEAN 1993C uses K^*()- mu+ nu_mu as well as K^*()- e+ nu_e events and makes a small  phase-space  adjustment to the number of the mu+ events to use them as e+ events.


pdgid: S032D72
text:
An amplitude analysis of D0 --> K- pi0 mu+ nu_mu with two components. ABLIKIM 2025  measures B(D0 --> K^*(892)- mu+ nu_mu , K^*()- --> K- pi0)/B(D0 --> K- pi0 mu+ nu_mu) =  94.24+-0.35+-0.29E-2, from which we determine the reported ratio assuming B(K^*()- --> K- pi0)  = 1/3. With the same assumption, ABLIKIM 2025  reports B(D0 --> K^*()- mu+ nu_mu) =  2.073+-0.039+-0.032E-2.


pdgid: S032B27
text:
BAI 1991 finds that a fraction 0.79+0.15-0.17+0.09-0.03 of combined D+ and D0 decays to Kbar pi e+ nu_e (24events) are Kbar^*(892) e+ nu_e. BAI 1991 uses 56 K- e+ nu_e events to measure a pole mass of 1.8+-0.3+-0.2 GeV/c**2 from the q**2 dependence of the decay rate.


pdgid: S032B28
text:
BAI 1991 finds that a fraction 0.79+0.15-0.17+0.09-0.03 of combined D+ and D0 decays to Kbar pi e+ nu_e (24events) are Kbar^*(892) e+ nu_e.


pdgid: S032D70
text:
ABLIKIM 2024CR reconstructs D0 --> K0S pi- pi0 e+ nu_e and assumes that all come from  Kbar_1()- --> K0S pi- pi0 decays.


pdgid: S032D71
text:
An amplitude analysis of D0 --> K- pi0 mu+ nu_mu with two components. ABLIKIM 2025  reports B(D0 --> ( K- pi0 )_S-wave mu+ nu_mu) = 4.223+-0.268+-0.222E-4.


pdgid: S032B75
text:
KODAMA 1993B searched in K- pi+ pi- mu+ nu_mu, but the limit includes other (Kbar^*(892) pi)^- charge states.


pdgid: S032S25
text:
HUANG 2005 uses both e and mu events, and makes a small correction to the mu events to make them effectively e events.  This result gives |V(c d)/V(c s).f(+)**pi(0)/f(+)**K(0)|**2 = 0.038+0.006-0.007+0.005-0.003.


pdgid: S032S25
text:
FRABETTI 1996B uses both e and mu events, and makes a small correction to the mu events to make them effectively e events.  This result gives |V(c d)/V(c s).f(+)**pi(0)/f(+)**K(0)|**2 = 0.050+-0.011+-0.002.


pdgid: S032S25
text:
BUTLER 1995 has 87+-33 pi- e+ nu_e events. The result gives |V(c d)/V(c s).f(+)**pi(0)/f(+)**K(0)|**2 = 0.052+-0.020+-0.007.


pdgid: S032Q80
text:
Seen 100% via D0 --> rho(770)- e+ nu_e, and also reported as the branching fraction for  D0 --> rho(770)- e+ nu_e.


pdgid: S032C39
text:
This result is the same as the one reported for D0 --> pi- pi0 e+ nu_e which ABLIKIM 2019C found to  proceed 100% via D0 --> rho(770)- e+ nu_e.  Superseded by ABLIKIM 2024CP.


pdgid: S032R12
text:
ABLIKIM 2018W measured the combined K-+ pi+- branching fraction to be 3.898%. We have subtracted off the doubly Cabibbo-suppressed branching fraction B(D0 --> K+ pi-) =  , even though it is less than one-third of the uncertainty of the combined  measurement, in order to treat this as a measurement of B(D0 --> K- pi+).


pdgid: S032R12
text:
ABACHI 1988, DECAMP 1991J, AKERIB 1993, ALBRECHT 1994F, and BARATE 1997C use D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+ decays. The pi+ is both slow and of low pT with respect to the event thrust axis or nearest jet (~~D^*()+ direction). The excess number of such pi+'s over background gives the number of D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+ events, and the fraction with D0 --> K- pi+ gives the D0 --> K- pi+ branching fraction.


pdgid: S032R12
text:
ARTUSO 1998, following ALBRECHT 1994, uses D0 mesons from Bbar0 --> D^*(2010)+ X lepton- nubar_lepton decays. Our average uses the CLEO average of this value with the values of COAN 1998 and AKERIB 1993.


pdgid: S032R12
text:
COAN 1998 assumes that Gamma(B --> Dbar X lepton+ nu)/Gamma(B --> X lepton+ nu) = 1.0 -3|V(u b)/V(c b)|**2-0.010+-0.005, the last term accounting for Bbar --> D_s()+ K X lepton- nubar.  COAN 1998 is included in the CLEO average in  ARTUSO 1998.


pdgid: S032R12
text:
ALBRECHT 1994 uses D0 mesons from Bbar0 --> D^*()+ lepton- nubar_lepton decays. This is a different set of events than used by ALBRECHT 1994F.


pdgid: S032R12
text:
This AKERIB 1993 value includes radiative corrections; without them, the value is 0.0391+-0.0008+-0.0017. AKERIB 1993 is included in the CLEO average in ARTUSO 1998.


pdgid: S032R12
text:
SCHINDLER 1981 (MARK-2) measures sigma(e+ e- --> psi(3770)) x branching fraction to be 0.24+-0.02nb. We use the MARK-3 (ADLER 1988C) value of sigma = 5.8+-0.5+-0.6nb.


pdgid: S032R12
text:
PERUZZI 1977 (MARK-1) measures sigma(e+ e- --> psi(3770)) x branching fraction to be 0.25+-0.05nb. We use the MARK-3 (ADLER 1988C) value of sigma = 5.8+-0.5+-0.6nb.


pdgid: S032S07
text:
The difference of HE 2008 D0 --> K0S pi0 and K0L pi0 branching fractions over the sum is 0.108+-0.025+-0.024. This is consistent with U-spin symmetry and the Cabibbo angle.


pdgid: S032R21
text:
See the footnote on the ALBRECHT 1994F measurement of Gamma(K- pi+)/Gamma(total) for the method used.


pdgid: S032R21
text:
SCHINDLER 1981 (MARK-2) measures sigma(e+ e- --> psi(3770)) x branching fraction to be 0.30+-0.08nb. We use the MARK-3 (ADLER 1988C) value of sigma = 5.8+-0.5+-0.6nb.


pdgid: S032R21
text:
PERUZZI 1977 (MARK-1) measures sigma(e+ e- --> psi(3770)) x branching fraction to be 0.46+-0.12nb. We use the MARK-3 (ADLER 1988C) value of sigma = 5.8+-0.5+-0.6nb.


pdgid: S032B59
text:
The error on this AUBERT 2008AL value includes both statistical and systematic uncertainties; the latter dominates.


pdgid: S032R19
text:
SCHINDLER 1981 (MARK-2) measures sigma(e+ e- --> psi(3770)) x branching fraction to be 0.68+-0.23nb. We use the MARK-3 (ADLER 1988C) value of sigma = 5.8+-0.5+-0.6nb.


pdgid: S032R24
text:
SCHINDLER 1981 (MARK-2) measures sigma(e+ e- --> psi(3770)) x branching fraction to be 0.68+-0.11nb. We use the MARK-3 (ADLER 1988C) value of sigma = 5.8+-0.5+-0.6nb.


pdgid: S032R24
text:
PERUZZI 1977 (MARK-1) measures sigma(e+ e- --> psi(3770)) x branching fraction to be 0.36+-0.10nb. We use the MARK-3 (ADLER 1988C) value of sigma = 5.8+-0.5+-0.6nb.


pdgid: S032B43
text:
In addition to the 14 ABLIKIM 2017O branching ratios we have listed, the paper gives 15 more  ratios for mostly non-resonant modes. Four of the 15 have less than 2-standard-deviation  significance. Here are some of the omitted modes, with S, P, V, A, and T for scalar, pseudo-scalar,  vector, axial-vector, and tensor spin sub-structures: pi+ (K- rho0)_P, pi+ (K- rho0)_V,  pi+ (Kbar^*()0 pi-)_P, pi+ (Kbar^*()0 pi-)_V, pi+ ( pi- ( K- pi+)(S-wave))(A),  (K- pi+)_V (pi+ pi-)_S, (K- pi+)_T (pi+ pi-)_S...


pdgid: S032R25
text:
AGUILAR-BENITEZ 1987F and BARLAG 1992C compute the branching fraction using topological normalization. They do not distinguish the presence of a third pi0, and thus are not included in the average.


pdgid: S032R25
text:
ADLER 1988C uses an absolute normalization method finding this decay channel opposite a detected Dbar0 --> K+ pi- in pure D Dbar events.


pdgid: S032D26
text:
ABLIKIM 2022U determines the ratios B(D0 --> K0S pi0 omega)/B(D0 --> K- pi+ omega) =     0.23+-0.01+-0.01 and B(D+ --> K0S pi+ omega)/B(D0 --> K- pi+ omega) =    0.21+-0.01+-0.01,  in significant tension with statistical isospin model expectations of  0.4 and 0.9 respectively.


pdgid: S032D24
text:
ABLIKIM 2022U determines the ratio B(D0 --> K0S pi0 omega)/B(D0 --> K- pi+ omega)    =    0.23+-0.01+-0.01, in significant tension with statistical isospin model expectation  of 0.4.


pdgid: S032S03
text:
The eta here is detected in its gamma gamma mode, but other eta modes are included in the value given.


pdgid: S032S04
text:
In addition to K0S a_0(980) and Kbar^*(892)0 eta modes, RUBIN 2004 finds a fit fraction of 0.246+-0.092+-0.091 for other, undetermined modes.


pdgid: S032Q97
text:
CHEN 2020A  reports 0.500+-0.002+-0.020+-0.003 from a measurement of [G(D0 --> K- pi+ eta)/G(D0 --> K- pi+)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] assuming B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.41+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S032Q98
text:
CHEN 2020A  reports 1.41+-0.04+0.12-0.11+-0.01E-2 from a measurement of [G(D0 --> Kbar^*(892)0 eta)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] assuming B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.41+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S032D32
text:
ABLIKIM 2022W  reports 0.414+-0.021+-0.010E-2 from a measurement of [G(D0 --> K0L phi)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] assuming B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 0.491+-0.005, which we rescale to our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S032C45
text:
AUBERT,B 2005J calls the mode K0S f_0(1400), but insofar as it is seen here at all, it is certainly the same as f_{{0}}(1370).


pdgid: S032P00
text:
AAIJ 2016N gives results for two S-wave parameterisations. We take the values from the model  with LASS parametrization, and the difference as a systematic uncertainty.


pdgid: S032P02
text:
AAIJ 2016N gives results for two S-wave parameterisations. We take the values from the model  with LASS parametrization, and the difference as a uncertainty (which in this case dominates)


pdgid: S032P03
text:
AAIJ 2016N gives results for two S-wave parameterisations. We take the values from the model  with LASS parametrization, and the difference as a systematic uncertainty (which in this case  dominates).


pdgid: S032S08
text:
The only major difference between fits I and II in the AUBERT 2007T analysis is in this mode, where the fit-I fraction is (16.3+-3.4+-2.1)%.


pdgid: S032S11
text:
When AUBERT 2007T replace the f_0(980) pi0 mode with a_0(980) pi0, the fit fraction is a negligibly different (11.0+-1.5+-1.2)%.


pdgid: S032R05
text:
The error is statistical only. CAWLFIELD 2006A also fits the Dalitz plot replacing this flat nonresonant background with broad S-wave kappa+- --> K+- pi0 resonances. There is no significant improvement in the fit, and K^*()+- K-+ and phi pi0 results are not much changed.


pdgid: S032D18
text:
LI 2021G  reports [G(D0 --> phi(1020) eta)/G(D0 --> K- pi+ eta)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 4.82+-0.23+-0.16E-3 which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S032B9
text:
LINK 2005G uses a smaller, cleaner subset of 1279+-48 events for the amplitude analysis that gives the results in the next data blocks.


pdgid: S032Q03
text:
ARTUSO 2012 and DARGENT 2017 use the same dataset, but ARTUSO 2012 uses a  formulation for the D-wave component that is in fact a mix of S- and D-wave, while DARGENT 2017 uses a  pure D-wave. This explains the discrepancy in their rho phi S- and D-wave components.


pdgid: S032Q16
text:
ARTUSO 2012 use a formulation for the D-wave component that is in fact a mix of S- and  D-wave, while DARGENT 2017 uses a pure D-wave.


pdgid: S032Q23
text:
DARGENT 2017 find K^*(1410)+ pi- and K^*(1680)+ pi-, which both peak outside the  D0 --> K K pi pi kinematic range, effectively indistinguishable; we list their result under  K^*(1680)+ pi-.


pdgid: S032P61
text:
DARGENT 2017 find K^*(1410)+ pi- and K^*(1680)+ pi-, which both peak outside the  D0 --> K K pi pi kinematic range, effectively indistinguishable.


pdgid: S032B93
text:
ABLIKIM 2022 determines the longitudinal polarization fraction of the phi and omega,  f_{{L}} = 0.00+-0.10+-0.08, corresponding to f_{{L}} < 0.24 at 95% CL.


pdgid: S032S26
text:
The BITENC 2008 right-sign sample includes about 15% of D0 --> K- pi0 lepton+ nu_lepton and other decays.


pdgid: S032S26
text:
AITALA 1996C uses D^*()+ --> D0 pi+ (and charge conjugate) decays to identify the charm at production and D0 --> K- lepton+ nu_lepton (and charge conjugate) decays to identify the charm at decay.


pdgid: S032R61
text:
This LINK 2005H result assumes no mixing but allows CP violation.  If neither mixing nor CP violation is allowed, R = 4.29+-0.63+-0.28E-3.


pdgid: S032R61
text:
This AUBERT 2003Z result allows CP violation. If CP violation is not allowed, R = 0.00359+-0.00020+-0.00027.


pdgid: S032R08
text:
This AAIJ 2018K value is for direct and indirect CP violation allowed. The value is the  same if either one or the other is not allowed, but in each case the error then is 0.028+-0.014E-3.


pdgid: S032R08
text:
This LINK 2005H result allows CP violation.  Allowing mixing but not CP violation, R(D) = 3.81+1.67-1.63+-0.92E-3.


pdgid: S032R9
text:
This ZHANG 2006 result allows CP violation, but the result does not change if CP violation is not allowed.


pdgid: S032R9
text:
This LI 2005A result allows CP violation. The limit becomes < 0.00042 (95% CL) if CP violation is not allowed.


pdgid: S032R9
text:
This AUBERT 2003Z result allows CP violation and assumes that the strong phase between D0 --> K+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K+ pi- is small, and limits only D0 --> Dbar0 transitions via off-shell intermediate states. The limit on transitions via on-shell intermediate states is 0.0016.


pdgid: S032R9
text:
This GODANG 2000 result allows CP violation and assumes that the strong phase between D0 --> K+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K+ pi- is small, and limits only D0 --> Dbar0 transitions via off-shell intermediate states. The limit on transitions via on-shell intermediate states is 0.0017.


pdgid: S032R9
text:
This BARATE 1998W result assumes no interference between the DCS and mixing amplitudes (y' = 0 in the note on ``D0-Dbar0 Mixing'' near the start of the D0 Listings). When interference is allowed, the limit degrades to 0.036 (95%CL).


pdgid: S032R75
text:
This ASNER 2005 limit allows CP violation. If CP violation is not allowed, the limit is 0.0042 at 95% CL.


pdgid: S032C24
text:
A combined fit with a recent LHCb D0 Dbar0 mixing results in AAIJ 2016F is also reported  to be 2.00+-0.11E-3.


pdgid: S032R00
text:
This AUBERT,B 2006N limit assumes no CP violation. The measured value corresponding to the limit is  2.3+1.8-1.4+-0.4E-4. If CP violation is allowed, this becomes 1.0+2.2-0.7+-0.3E-4.


pdgid: S032P22
text:
This result uses external input on the mixing parameters x, y. Without this input, the result is 3.215+-0.136E-3.


pdgid: S032P22
text:
A combined fit with a recent LHCb D0 Dbar0 mixing results in AAIJ 2016F is also reported  to be 3.01+-0.07E-3.


pdgid: S032R62
text:
AAIJ 2016F result comes from time-dependent analysis that uses external input on the mixing  parameters x, y. Without this input, the result is 3.29+-0.08E-3.


pdgid: S032R62
text:
AMMAR 1991 cannot and DYTMAN 2001, TIAN 2005 do not distinguish between  doublyCabibbo-suppressed decay and D0-Dbar0 mixing.


pdgid: S032R62
text:
This AITALA 1998result assumes no D0-Dbar0 mixing (R(M) in  the note on ``D0-Dbar0 Mixing'').It becomes -0.0020+0.0117-0.0106+-0.0035 whenmixing  is allowed and decay-time information is used todistinguish doubly Cabibbo-suppressed decays from  mixing.


pdgid: S032R62
text:
ANJOS 1988C uses decay-time information to distinguish doubly Cabibbo-suppressed (DCS) decays from D0-Dbar0 mixing. However, the result assumes no interference between the DCS and mixing amplitudes When interference is allowed, the limit degrades to 0.033.


pdgid: S032S83
text:
AAIJ 2016F result comes from an unconstrained decay-time dependent fit to the wrong-sign to  right-sign decay rates ratio as (x^2 + y^2)/2.


pdgid: S032R99
text:
AITALA 1998 uses decay-time information to distinguish doubly Cabibbo-suppressed decays from D0-Dbar0 mixing. The fit allows interference between the two amplitudes, and also allows CP violation in this term.  The central value obtained is 0.0039+0.0036-0.0032+-0.0016.  When interference is disallowed, the result becomes 0.0021+-0.0009+-0.0002.


pdgid: S032R99
text:
This combines results of ANJOS 1988C on K+ pi- and K+ pi- pi+ pi- (via Dbar0) reported in the data block above (see footnotes there). It assumes no interference.


pdgid: S032R7
text:
Here MISHRA 1994 uses ``the statistical approach advocated by the PDG.''  For an alternate approach, giving a limit of 9E-6 at 90% confidence level, see the paper.


pdgid: S032R63
text:
This FREYBERGER 1996 limit is obtained using a phase-space model.  The limit changes to <1.8E-4 using a photon pole amplitude model.


pdgid: S032C15
text:
The second AAIJ 2017BG error is the systematic 0.51E-7 and normalization 0.97E-7  mode errors added in quadrature.


pdgid: S032P67
text:
AAIJ 2014B measures this branching-fraction limit relative to the pi+ pi- phi, phi --> mu+ mu- fraction.  The above limit excludes the resonant phi, omega, and rho regions, and then fills those gaps with a phase-space model.


pdgid: S032R64
text:
This FREYBERGER 1996 limit is obtained using a phase-space model.  The limit changes to <4.5E-4 using a photon pole amplitude model.


pdgid: S032S47
text:
This FREYBERGER 1996 limit is obtained using a phase-space model.  The limit changes to <2.7E-4 using a photon pole amplitude model.


pdgid: S032S48
text:
This FREYBERGER 1996 limit is obtained using a phase-space model.  The limit changes to <6.5E-4 using a photon pole amplitude model.


pdgid: S032Q86
text:
Observation with 9.7 sigma significance. The last uncertainty is due to the uncertainty on the  branching fraction of the normalization mode, D0 --> K- pi+ pi+ pi-.  The second uncertainty is other systematic and is dominated by the model parameterization.


pdgid: S032Q86
text:
LEES 2019A also sets an upper limit for non-resonant regions, where long-distance effects are  expected to be small: < 3.1E-6 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S032S49
text:
This FREYBERGER 1996 limit is obtained using a phase-space model.  The limit changes to <7.6E-5 using a photon pole amplitude model.


pdgid: S032C19
text:
The second AAIJ 2017BG error is the systematic 0.09E-7 and normalization 0.16E-7  mode errors added in quadrature.


pdgid: S032S50
text:
This FREYBERGER 1996 limit is obtained using a phase-space model.  The limit changes to <2.4E-4 using a photon pole amplitude model.


pdgid: S032R70
text:
ABLIKIM 2018P report a 90% C.L. limit on D0 --> KS e+ e- of 1.2E-5 which is  here interpreted in terms of D0 --> Kbar0 e+ e-.


pdgid: S032S51
text:
This FREYBERGER 1996 limit is obtained using a phase-space model.  The limit changes to <2.0E-4 using a photon pole amplitude model.


pdgid: S032P25
text:
AAIJ 2016I uses B(D0 --> K- pi+ pi+ pi-) = 8.287+-0.043+-0.200E-2 value for the  normalization mode.


pdgid: S032S52
text:
This FREYBERGER 1996 limit is obtained using a phase-space model.  The limit changes to <1.0E-3 using a photon pole amplitude model.


pdgid: S032S54
text:
LEES 2020A quotes separate limits B(D0 --> eta e+- mu-+ , eta --> gamma gamma) <  24.0E-7 and B(D0 --> eta e+- mu-+ , eta --> pi+ pi- pi0) < 43.0E-7.


pdgid: S032S55
text:
This FREYBERGER 1996 limit is obtained using a phase-space model.  The limit changes to <5.0E-5 using a photon pole amplitude model.


pdgid: S032S56
text:
This FREYBERGER 1996 limit is obtained using a phase-space model.  The same limit is obtained using a photon pole amplitude model.


pdgid: S032S57
text:
This FREYBERGER 1996 limit is obtained using a phase-space model.  The limit changes to <3.3E-5 using a photon pole amplitude model.


pdgid: S032EFL
text:
ABLIKIM 2024CO also reports the measurement of the strong phase difference between D0 and  Dbar0 decays in bins of the phase space.


pdgid: S032EFL
text:
A combination of three consistent measurements with CP-eigenstate, quasi-CP-eigenstate  and CP-mixed tags.


pdgid: S032EFL
text:
MALDE 2015 and DARGENT 2017 use different CLEO data sets, so in principle their results  could be averaged. However, given the importance that model-independence has in the use of this  value, we exclude the amplitude model-derived result from the average.


pdgid: S032A96
text:
A combined measurement of the CP-even fraction using both CP tags and K_S,L()0 pi+ pi-  tags.  ABLIKIM 2023AJ reports CP-even fractions 0.704+-0.042+-0.028 and 0.798+-0.077+-0.019 for   the former and latter tags, respectively.


pdgid: S032A1
text:
AAIJ 2023AC result comes from 5.7 fb**-1 of data. Also reports the values of the direct  CP asymmetries,  a(pi pi)**CP = 23.2+-6.1E-4 and a(KK)**CP =  7.7+-5.7E-4, with  a correlation of 88%, obtained using previous  determinations of  A(CP)(K K),  DeltaA(CP), DeltaY, the  reconstructed mean decay times of  D0 --> pi pi and  D0 --> K K in the aforementioned measurements, and the world average of  the D0 lifetime   (PDG 2022).


pdgid: S032A1
text:
STARIC 2008 uses D0 --> K- pi+ and Dbar0 --> K+ pi- decays to correct for detector-induced asymmetries.


pdgid: S032A1
text:
AITALA 1998C,  LINK 2000B, CSORNA 2002, and ACOSTA 2005C measure N(D0 --> K+ K-)/N(D0 --> K- pi+), the ratio of numbers of events observed, and similarly for the Dbar0.


pdgid: S032A8
text:
HAYRAPETYAN 2024BB reports a value of 6.3+-3.0+-0.2+-0.8E-2 where the third  uncertainty is from the world-average value of A(CP)(K0S pi+ pi-) = 0.1+-0.8%.  We have added the systematic uncertainties in quadrature.


pdgid: S032A8
text:
AAIJ 2021X reports a value of -3.1+-1.2+-0.4+-0.2E-2 where the third uncertainty   is from A(CP)(K+ K-) = 0.04+-0.12+-0.10%, as measured  by  LHCb. We have  added the systematic uncertainties in quadrature. Supersedes  AAIJ 2018AV.


pdgid: S032A8
text:
The systematic uncertainty is dominated by the uncertainty on A(CP) in the control channel  D0 --> KS pi0.


pdgid: S032A4
text:
AAIJ 2017M value combines DeltaA(CP)(pi pi, K K) from AAIJ 2016D,  A(CP)(K K) from AAIJ 2017M, and A(CP)(pi pi) from AAIJ 2014AK.


pdgid: S032A4
text:
AITALA 1998C, LINK 2000B, CSORNA 2002, and ACOSTA 2005C measure N(D0 --> pi+ pi-)/N(D0 --> K- pi+), the ratio of numbers of events observed, and similarly for the Dbar0.


pdgid: S032A5
text:
Based on 3 fb**-1 of data collected at sqrt(s) = 7, 8 TeV. Allowing for CP violation, the direct CP-violation in mixing is reported for the D0 --> K+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K+ pi-.


pdgid: S032A5
text:
This AUBERT 2003Z limit assumes no mixing. If mixing is allowed, the 95% confidence-level interval is (-2.8~<A(D)<~4.9)x10**-3.


pdgid: S032A5
text:
This GODANG 2000 result assumes no D0-Dbar0 mixing and becomes -0.43<A(CP)<+0.34 at 95% CL. If mixing is allowd A(CP) = -0.01+0.16-0.17+-0.01.


pdgid: S032A72
text:
ABLIKIM 2022B uses quantum correlations in e+ e- --> D0 Dbar0 at the psi(3770) to    measure the asymmetry of the branching fraction of D0 --> K- pi+ in CP-odd and    CP-even eigenstates. It then extracts the strong-phase difference delta(K pi).


pdgid: S032A72
text:
ABLIKIM 2022B uses quantum correlations in e+ e- --> D0 Dbar0 at the psi(3770) to      measure the asymmetry of the branching fraction of D0 --> K- pi+ in CP-odd and      CP-even eigenstates, using the predominantly CP-even decay D0 --> pi+ pi- pi0 mode as     reference. It then extracts the strong-phase difference delta(K pi).


pdgid: S032A72
text:
ABLIKIM 2014C uses quantum correlations in e+ e- --> D0 Dbar0 at the psi(3770) to measure the asymmetry  of the branching fraction of D0 --> K- pi+ in CP-odd and CP-even eigenstates. It  then extracts the strong-phase difference delta(K pi). Superseded by ABLIKIM 2022BM.


pdgid: S032A6
text:
KOPP 2001 fits separately the D0 and Dbar0 Dalitz plots and then calculates the integrated difference of normalized densities divided by the integrated sum.


pdgid: S032A10
text:
This is the overall result of AALTONEN 2012AD. Following are the 15 CP fit-fraction asymmetries from the amplitude analysis of the D0 and Dbar0 --> K0S pi+ pi- Dalitz plots.


pdgid: S032A10
text:
This is the overall result of ASNER 2004A; CP-violating limits are also given below for each of the 10 resonant submodes found in an amplitude analysis of the D0 and Dbar0 --> K0S pi+ pi- Dalitz plots.


pdgid: S032D54
text:
SANGAL 2023 also measures the parity asymmetry A(T) in the sign of the triple  product of momenta between one K(S)0 (the one with higher momentum) and the two charged pions,  and reports the resulting CP asymmetry between the CP conjugate modes  (A(T) - Abar(T))/2 = -1.95+-1.42+0.14-0.12E-2.


pdgid: S032C77
text:
Supersedes AAIJ 2018I. This analysis provides the first complete angular analysis of D0 --> K+ K- mu+ mu-,   and measures angular moments for several bins in the dimuon invariant mass. The mass of the   dihadron system is required to be less than 1200 MeV.


pdgid: S032C78
text:
Supersedes AAIJ 2018I. This analysis provides the first complete angular analysis of D0 --> pi+ pi- mu+ mu-,   and measures angular moments for several bins in the dimuon invariant mass. The mass of the   dihadron system is required to be less than 1200 MeV.


pdgid: S032DCP
text:
Calculated from the AUBERT 2008M values of A(CP)(K+ K-) and A(CP)(pi+ pi-). The systematic error here combines the systematic errors in quadrature, and therefore somewhat over-estimates it.


pdgid: S032L01
text:
Unusually, AAIJ 2015A assigns an uncertainty on the p value of +-0.5%. This results  from limited test statistics.


pdgid: S032TV0
text:
KIM 2019 also study CP-violating asymmetries in several other kinematic variables. No  evidence for CP violation is found in any of them.


pdgid: S032C76
text:
PRASANTH 2017 also measures A(Tviol) in sub-regions of the D0 --> K0S pi+ pi- pi0  phase-space. No evidence of T violation is found.


pdgid: S032CPT
text:
The constraints are derived by reinterpreting the LHCb measurement of the time-dependent asymmetry  in the Cabibbo-favored D0 --> K- pi+ and Dbar0 --> K+ pi- decay rates.  These constraints can be directly translated into the flavor eigenstate decay width difference  deltaGamma = Gamma(D0) - Gamma(Dbar0) by the  relation deltaGamma = (yRe(z) - xIm(z)) x  2Gamma, yielding (-4.7 < deltaGamma < 2.1) x  E-16 GeV at 95% CL.


pdgid: S032FP0
text:
LEES 2015F reports a value 0.1374+-0.0038+-0.0022+-0.0009, where  the last uncertainty is due to the uncertainties of the D0 --> K- pi+ branching fraction.


pdgid: S032PWA
text:
AAIJ 2019C also provides measurements of CP violation in D0 --> K+ K- pi+ pi-, with  results compatible with CP symmetry.


pdgid: M061DM
text:
Obtained by analyzing CLEO-c data but not authored by the CLEO Collaboration. This value comes from the average of the results for two decay modes, D0 --> K- pi+ and D0 --> K- pi+ pi- pi+.


pdgid: M061R2
text:
Derived from the ratio Gamma(D0 pi0) / Gamma(D0 gamma) assuming that the branching fractions of D^*()0 --> D0 pi0 and D^*()0 --> D0 gamma decays sum to 100%.


pdgid: M061R2
text:
The BUTLER 1992 and ALBRECHT 1995F branching ratios are not independent, they have been constrained by the authors to sum to 100%.


pdgid: M061R01
text:
The reported value also assumes B(B- --> J/psi(1S) K-) =  10.20+-0.19E-4 and B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 59.61+-0.33E-3 for the  normalization mode B- --> J/psi(1S) K-.


pdgid: M061R01
text:
AAIJ 2023D  reports <2.6E-8 from a measurement of [G(D^*(2007)0 --> mu+ mu-)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+)] assuming B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+) = 4.90+-0.17E-3, which we rescale to our best value B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+) = 5.17E-3.


pdgid: M062M
text:
From simultaneous fit to D^*(2010)+, D^*(2007)0, D+, and D0; not independent of FELDMAN 1977B mass difference below.


pdgid: M062M
text:
PERUZZI 1977 mass not independent of FELDMAN 1977B mass difference below and PERUZZI 1977 D0 mass value.


pdgid: M062EM
text:
Not independent of FELDMAN 1977B mass difference above, PERUZZI 1977 D0 mass, and GOLDHABER 1977 D^*(2007)0 mass.


pdgid: M062R1
text:
The  branching ratios are not independent, they have been constrained by the authors to sum to 100%.


pdgid: M062R2
text:
Not independent of G(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)/G(total) and [G(D^*(2010)+ --> D+ pi0)/G(total) measurement.


pdgid: M252M
text:
From the Dalitz plot analysis including various K^* and D^** mesons as well as broad  structures in the K pi S-wave and the D pi S- and P-waves.


pdgid: M253M
text:
From the combined fit of the M(D+ pi-) and M(D^*()+ pi-) distributions.  and A(D_{{2}}) fixed to the theoretical prediction of -1.


pdgid: M253M
text:
From the fit of the M(D0 pi+) distribution. The widths of the D_{{1}}()+ and D_{{2}}^*()+ are fixed to 25 MeV and 37 MeV,  and A(D_{{1}}()) and A(D_{{2}}()) are fixed to the theoretical predictions of 3 and -1, respectively.


pdgid: M253M
text:
Calculated using the mass difference m(D_{{1}}^0()) - m(D^*()+)(PDG) reported below and m(D^*()+)(PDG) = 2010.27+-0.17 MeV. The 0.17 MeV uncertainty of the PDG mass value should be added to the experimental uncertainty of 0.9 MeV.


pdgid: M253PAH
text:
From the combined fit of the M(D+ pi-) and M(D^*()+ pi-) distributions.  and A(D_{{2}}) fixed to the theoretical prediction of -1. A pure D-wave not excluded although some S-wave mixing possible.


pdgid: M253PAH
text:
Assuming Gamma(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-) / Gamma(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 1.065+-0.026 and equal partial widths and helicity angle distributions for charged and neutral D_{{1}}() mesons.


pdgid: M254M
text:
From the amplitude analysis in the model describing the D+ pi- wave together with virtual  contributions from the D^*(2007)0 and B^*0() states, and components corresponding to the  D_{{2}}^*(2460)0, D_{{1}}^*(2680)0, D_{{3}}^*(2760)0, and D_{{2}}^*(3000)0 resonances.


pdgid: M254M
text:
From the amplitude analysis in the model describing the D+ pi- wave together with virtual  contributions from the D^*(2007)0 and B^*()0 states, nonresonant spin-0 and spin-1  components as well as the D_{{0}}^*(2400)0, D_{{2}}^*(2460)0 and D_{{1}}^*(2760)0 resonances.


pdgid: M254M
text:
Calculated using the mass difference m(D_{{2}}^*()0) - m(D^*()+)(PDG) reported below and m(D^*()+)(PDG) = 2010.27+-0.17 MeV. The 0.17 MeV uncertainty of the PDG mass value should be added to the experimental uncertainty of +1.2 MeV.


pdgid: M254M
text:
Fit includes the contribution from D_{{0}}^*(2400)+-. Not independent of the corresponding mass difference measurement, (mass(D_{{2}}^*(2460)+-)) - (mass(D_{{2}}^*(2460)0)).


pdgid: M254R01
text:
Assuming Gamma(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-) / Gamma(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 1.065+-0.026 and equal partial widths for charged and neutral D_{{2}}^*() mesons.


pdgid: M203PAM
text:
Systematic uncertainties not estimated. The states observed in the D^*() pi and D pi final states are not necessarily the same.


pdgid: S034T
text:
This AAIJ 2017AN value is derived from the difference between the D_{{s}}()- and D-  widths.  The 3rd uncertainty, +-1.7E-15 s, arises from the uncertainty of the D-  width.


pdgid: S034R28
text:
ABLIKIM 2021AC finds that the ratio of the D_{{s}}()+ and D0 semielectronic widths is  0.790+-0.016+-0.020.


pdgid: S034R28
text:
ABLIKIM 2021AC reports a value of 6.30+-0.13+-0.09+-0.04E-2, where the last  uncertainty is an external systematic from B(D_s()+ --> tau nu). We have added the systematic  uncertainties in quadrature.


pdgid: S034R28
text:
Using the D_{{s}}()+ and D0 lifetimes, ASNER 2010 finds that the ratio of the D_{{s}}()+ and D0 semileptonic widths is 0.828+-0.051+-0.025.


pdgid: S034R7
text:
ABLIKIM 2016O also reports that when constrained by the Standard Model ratio of  Gamma(D_s()+ --> tau+ nu_tau)/Gamma(D_s()+ --> mu+ nu_mu) = 9.76, the branching fraction  is found to be (0.495+-0.067+-0.026)%. The constrained value is used to obtain the  decay  constant, f(D_{{s}}()+) = (241.0+-16.3+-6.6) MeV.


pdgid: S034R7
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010J uses mu+ nu_mu and tau+ nu_tau events together to get f(D_{{s}}) = (258.6+-6.4+-7.5) MeV.


pdgid: S034R7
text:
PEDLAR 2007A also fits mu+ and tau+ events together and gets an effective mu+ nu_mu branching fraction of (6.38+-0.59+-0.33)xE-3


pdgid: S034R7
text:
This HEISTER 2002I result is not actually an independent measurement of the absolute mu+ nu_mu branching fraction, but is in fact based on our phi pi+ branching fraction of 3.6+-0.9%, so it cannot be included in our overall fit. HEISTER 2002I combines its D_s+ --> tau+ nu_tau and mu+ nu_mu branching fractions to get f(D_{{s}})= (285+-19+-40) MeV.


pdgid: S034R50
text:
AUBERT 2007V gets f(D_{{s}}()+)= (283+-17+-16) MeV, using Gamma(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)/Gamma(total) = (4.71+-0.46)%.


pdgid: S034R50
text:
ALEXANDROV 2000 uses f(D)**2/f(D_{{s}})**2 = 0.82+-0.09 from a lattice-gauge-theory calculation to get the relative numbers of D+ --> mu+ nu_mu and D_s()+ --> mu+ nu_mu events.  The present result leads to f(D_{{s}})= (323+-44+-36) MeV.


pdgid: S034R50
text:
CHADHA 1998 obtains f(D_{{s}}) = (280+-19+-28+-34) MeV from this measurement, using Gamma(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)/Gamma(total) = 0.036+-0.009.


pdgid: S034R50
text:
ACOSTA 1994 obtains f(D_{{s}}) = (344+-37+-52+-42) MeV from this measurement, using Gamma(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)/Gamma(total) = 0.037+-0.009.


pdgid: S034R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2016O also reports that when constrained by the Standard Model ratio of  Gamma(D_s()+ --> tau+ nu_tau)/Gamma(D_s()+ --> mu+ nu_mu) = 9.76; the branching fraction  is found to be (4.83+-0.65+-0.26)%.


pdgid: S034R76
text:
ALEXANDER 2009, NAIK 2009A, and ONYISI 2009 use different tau decay modes and are independent. The three papers combined give f(D_{{s}}) = (259.7+-7.8+-3.4) MeV.


pdgid: S034R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2021BE uses tau+ --> pi+ nubar_tau decays. When constrained by the Standard Model  ratio  of Gamma(D_s()+ --> tau+ nu_tau)/Gamma(D_s()+ --> mu+ nu_mu) = 9.75, the  branching  fraction is found to be (5.22+-0.10+-0.14)%. Superseded by ABLIKIM 2023BP.


pdgid: S034R76
text:
ECKLUND 2008 and PEDLAR 2007A are independent: ECKLUND 2008 uses tau+ --> e+ nu_e nubar_tau events, PEDLAR 2007A uses tau+ --> pi+ nubar_tau events.


pdgid: S034R76
text:
HEISTER 2002I combines its D_s+ --> tau+ nu_tau and mu+ nu_mu branching fractions to get f(D_{{s}})= (285+-19+-40) MeV.


pdgid: S034R76
text:
The second ACCIARRI 1997F error here combines in quadrature systematic (0.016) and normalization (0.018) errors.  The branching fraction gives f(D_{{s}}) = (309+-58+-33+-38) MeV.


pdgid: S034S20
text:
This ECKLUND 2008 value also uses results from PEDLAR 2007A, and it is not independent of other results in these Listings. Combined with earlier CLEO results, the decay constant f(D_{{s}}) is 274+-10+-5 MeV.


pdgid: S034S23
text:
This AUBERT 2008AN ratio is only for the K+ K- mass in the range 1.01-to-1.03 GeV in the numerator and 1.0095-to-1.0295 GeV in the denominator.


pdgid: S034R71
text:
BRANDENBURG 1995 uses both e+ and mu+ events and makes a phase-space adjustment to use the mu+ events as e+ events.


pdgid: S034P54
text:
Assuming B(f_0() --> pi0 pi0) = 1/3 via the isospin limit, this result implies B(D_s()+ --> f_0(980) e+ nu_e)  =  2.4+-0.4E-3.


pdgid: S034S48
text:
HIETALA 2015 uses a tighter cut on the reconstructed pi+ pi- mass (+-60 MeV around  the f0) than ECKLUND 2009. It finds that applying the same tight cut to  both analyses  gives consistent results.


pdgid: S034Q01
text:
Partial wave analysis of 939 D_s()+ --> K+ K- mu+ nu_mu events, assuming K+ K- S-wave is  100% f_{{0}}(980).


pdgid: S034S71
text:
ZUPANC 2013 finds the Kbar0 from its missing-mass squared, not from K0S --> pi+ pi-. The DCS (D_s()+ --> K+ K0) contribution to this fraction is estimated to be an order of magnitude below the statistical uncertainty.


pdgid: S034R6
text:
This AUBERT 2006N measurement uses Bbar0 --> D_s^(*)()- D^(*)()+ and B- --> D_s^(*)()- D^(*)()0 decays, including some from other papers. However, the result is independent of AUBERT 2005V.


pdgid: S034R6
text:
AUBERT 2005V uses the ratio of B0 --> D^*()- D_s^*()+ events seen in two different ways, in both of which the D^*()- --> Dbar()0 pi- decay is fully reconstructed: (1) The D_s^*()+ --> D_s()+ gamma,  D_s()+ --> phi pi+ decay is fully reconstructed. (2) The number of events in the D_{{s}}()+ peak in the missing mass spectrum  against the D^*()- gamma is measured.


pdgid: S034R6
text:
ARTUSO 1996 uses partially reconstructed Bbar0 --> D^*()+ D_s^*()- decays to get a model-independent value for Gamma(D_s()- --> phi pi-)/Gamma(D0 --> K- pi+) of 0.92+-0.20+-0.11.


pdgid: S034R6
text:
BAI 1995C uses e+ e- --> D_s()+ D_s()- events in which one or both of the D_{{s}}()+- are observed to obtain the first model-independent measurement of the D_s()+ --> phi pi+ branching fraction, without assumptions about sigma(D_{{s}}()+-). However, with only two ``doubly-tagged'' events, the statistical error is very large.


pdgid: S034P85
text:
ABLIKIM 2022AH observe an a_{{0}}()-like state with mass mass(a_{{0}}()) = 1.817+-0.008+-0.020   GeV,    and name the intermediate resonance a_{{0}}(1817). We interpret this as the a_{{0}}(1710)   observed  by LEES 2021A.


pdgid: S034P65
text:
Based on isospin considerations, the authors interpret the suppression in the observed rate of this   mode compared to D_S()+ --> f_0(980) pi+ , f_0() --> K+ K- as likely due to the destructive   interference between a_{{0}}(980) and f_{{0}}(980) in decays to KS KS.


pdgid: S034S03
text:
ABLIKIM 2021U uses an amplitude analysis of D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+ pi0 with 9 components.  Superseded by ABLIKIM 2024BD.


pdgid: S034P24
text:
Kbar_1(1270)0 --> K^*(892) pi denotes a sum over Kbar(892)0 pi0 and K(892)- pi+ final  states, which are assumed to have relative branching ratio 1/2, as per isospin.


pdgid: S034P26
text:
Kbar_1(1400)0 --> K^*(892) pi denotes a sum over Kbar(892)0 pi0 and K(892)- pi+ final  states, which are assumed to have relative branching ratio 1/2, as per isospin.


pdgid: S034S13
text:
AAIJ 2023AN, ABLIKIM 2022BI, and AUBERT 2009O give the amplitude and phase of the   pi+ pi-    S-wave in bins of pi+ pi- invariant-mass. (50 bins for AAIJ 2023AN, 29   for ABLIKIM 2022BI and AUBERT 2009O.)


pdgid: S034R82
text:
FRABETTI 1997D calls this mode S(1475) pi+, but finds the mass and width of this S(1475) to be in excellent agreement with those of the f_{{0}}(1500).


pdgid: S034S17
text:
ABLIKIM 2025A  reports [G(D_s()+ --> eta pi+)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 3.58+-0.21+-0.06E-3 which we divide by our best value B(eta --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 23.02+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S034P07
text:
Coherent sum of D_s()+ --> a_0()+ pi0 --> eta pi+ pi0 and D_s()+ --> a_0()0 pi+ --> eta pi+ pi0.  ABLIKIM 2019BE find a_{{0}}(980)0-f(980) mixing effects negligibly small in this  D_s()+ --> eta pi+ pi0 Dalitz plot analysis.


pdgid: S034R33
text:
This JESSOP 1998 fraction, when combined with other eta^' fractions, greatly overshoots the  inclusive eta^' fraction. See the measurement just above, which fits nicely.


pdgid: S034P59
text:
Result of an amplitude analysis of D_s()+ --> pi+ pi0 eta^' which found that D_s()+ --> rho+ eta^' is  the dominant decay mode, with other contributions negligible. No uncertainty is assigned to this  100% fit fraction; however, the fit fractions of non-resonant contributions are shown to be  below 1%.


pdgid: S034S68
text:
An amplitude analysis in the same publication finds that  D_s()+ --> rho+ eta^' is the only  statistically significant contribution to this decay. Superseded by ABLIKIM 2024BD.


pdgid: S034P72
text:
ABLIKIM 2022BL reports [G(D_s()+ --> K+ omega)/G(D_s()+ --> K+ pi+ pi- pi0)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 9.7+-1.5+-0.6E-2 which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S034P92
text:
ABLIKIM 2021AB uses an amplitude analysis with 5 resonant modes plus one background component.  Superseded by ABLIKIM 2024BD.


pdgid: S034A37
text:
Amplitude analysis with 7 components, one of which is a model-independent pi+ pi- S-wave   parametrisation as complex numbers in 50 pi+ pi- mass bins.


pdgid: S034A37
text:
Amplitude analysis with 4 components, one of which is a model-independent pi+ pi- S-wave  parametrisation as complex numbers in 29 pi+ pi- mass bins.


pdgid: S034A30
text:
ABLIKIM 2021BE also reports that when constrained by the Standard Model ratio of  Gamma(D_s()+ --> tau+ nu_tau)/Gamma(D_s()+ --> mu+ nu_mu) = 9.75, the result is (-0.1+-1.9+-1.0)%.


pdgid: S034A05
text:
LEES 2013E finds that after subtracting the contribution due to K0-Kbar0 mixing, the CP asymmetry is (+0.28+-0.23+-0.24)%.


pdgid: S034A21
text:
AAIJ 2014BD reports its result as A(CP)(D_s()+- --> K0S K+-) with CP-violation effects in the K0-Kbar0 system subtracted. It also measures A(CP)(D+- --> Kbar0 / K0 K+-) + A(CP)(D_s()+- --> Kbar0 / K0 pi+-) = (0.41+-0.49+-0.26)%.


pdgid: S034FR2
text:
To compare with previous measurements, this AUBERT 2008AN value is from a fit that fixes the pole masses at mass(A) = 2.5 GeV/c**2 and mass(V) = 2.1 GeV/c**2. A simultaneous fit to r(2), r(v), r(0) (a significant s-wave contribution) and mass(A), gives r(2) = 0.763+-0.071+-0.065.


pdgid: S034FRV
text:
To compare with previous measurements, this AUBERT 2008AN value is from a fit that fixes the pole masses at mass(A) = 2.5 GeV/c**2 and mass(V) = 2.1 GeV/c**2. A simultaneous fit to r(2), r(v), r(0) (a significant s-wave contribution) and mass(A), gives r(v) = 1.849+-0.060+-0.095.


pdgid: S034A50
text:
From an analysis of D_s()+ --> pi+ pi- e+ mu_e decays. ABLIKIM 2024AT uses a simple pole  parametrization of the hadronic form factor and the Flatte' formula for describing the f_{{0}}(980)  decay.


pdgid: S034A29
text:
ABLIKIM 2024CG uses tau+ --> (e+ nu_e , mu+ nu_nu , pi+ , rho+) nubar_tau decays.  The third uncertainty is due to the uncertainty of the D_{{s}}()+ lifetime.


pdgid: S034A29
text:
ABLIKIM 2023BP uses tau+ --> pi+ nubar_tau decays. The third uncertainty is due to the input parameters, mainly the D_{{s}}()+ lifetime.


pdgid: S034A29
text:
The third uncertainty is dominated by the uncertainty of the D_{{s}}()+ lifetime. Superseded by ABLIKIM 2023BP.


pdgid: S034A29
text:
ABLIKIM 2021BE uses tau+ --> pi+ nubar_tau decays. When constrained by the Standard Model  ratio    of Gamma(D_s()+ --> tau+ nu_tau)/Gamma(D_s()+ --> mu+ nu_mu) = 9.75, the result  is   243.2+-2.3+-3.3+-1.0.


pdgid: M172M
text:
From a fit of the D_{{s}}^* recoil mass where the D_{{s0}}^*(2317) signal  is described with a  Crystal Ball function convolved with a Gaussian function.


pdgid: M173M
text:
The average of the values obtained from the D_s()+ gamma, D_s()+ pi0 gamma,D_s()+ pi+ pi- final state.


pdgid: M121M
text:
From a fit of the D_{{s}}()+ recoil mass distribution with an incoherent sum of the S-wave and  D-wave Breit-Wigner line shapes.


pdgid: M121M
text:
Calculated using mass()(D^*(2010)+-) = 2010.0+-0.5 MeV, mass()(D^*(2007)0) = 2006.7+-0.5 MeV, and the mass difference below.


pdgid: M121M
text:
Calculated using the mass difference mass()(D_{{s1}}()+)- mass()(D^*()+)(PDG) below and mass()(D^*()+)(PDG) = 2010.25+-0.14 MeV. Assuming S-wave decay of the D_{{s1}}(2536) to D^*()+ K0S, using a Breit-Wigner line shape corresponding to L=0.


pdgid: M121M
text:
Calculated using the mass difference m(D_{{s1}}()+) - m(D^*()+)(PDG) reported below and m(D^*()+)(PDG) = 2010.27+-0.17 MeV.


pdgid: M121DN
text:
Assuming S-wave decay of the D_{{s1}}(2536) to D^*()+ K0S, using a Breit-Wigner line shape corresponding to L=0.


pdgid: M121W
text:
From a fit of the D_{{s}}()+ recoil mass distribution with an incoherent sum of the S-wave and  S-wave  Breit-Wigner line shapes.


pdgid: M121R01
text:
Determined as ratio of exclusive e+ e- --> D_s()+ [ Dbar^*()0 K- ]  and inclusive  e+ e- --> D_s()+ X measurements.


pdgid: M148R2
text:
Determined as ratio of exclusive e+ e- --> D_s()+ [ Dbar0 K- ]  and inclusive  e+ e- --> D_s()+ X measurements.


pdgid: M182M
text:
From the combined fit of the D+ K0S and D0 K+  modes in the model including the  D_{{s2}}^*(2573)+, D_{{s1}}^*(2700)+ and spin-0 D_{{sJ}}^*(2860)+.


pdgid: M196M
text:
Separated from the spin-3 component D_{{s3}}^*(2860)- by a fit of the helicity angle of the   Dbar0 K- system, with a statistical significance of the spin-3 and spin-1 components in excess of 10 sigma.


pdgid: M196W
text:
Separated from the spin-3 component D_{{s3}}^*(2860)- by a fit of the helicity angle of the Dbar0 K- system, with a statistical significance of the spin-3 and spin-1 components in  excess of 10 sigma.


pdgid: M226M
text:
Separated from the spin-1 component D_{{s1}}^*(2860)- by a fit of the helicity angle of the  Dbar0 K- system, with a statistical significance of the spin-3 and spin-1 components in  excess  of 10 sigma.


pdgid: M226M
text:
From the combined fit of the D+ K0S and D0 K+ modes in the model including the  D_{{s2}}^*(2573)+, D_{{s1}}^*(2700)+ and spin-0 D_{{sJ}}^*(2860)+.


pdgid: S041M
text:
CSORNA 2000 uses fully reconstructed 526 B+ --> J/psi^(') K+ events and invariant masses without beam constraint.


pdgid: S041M
text:
Found using fully reconstructed decays with J/psi(1S).  ALBRECHT 1987D assume mass(Upsilon(4S)) = 10577 MeV.


pdgid: S041T
text:
Measured using B- --> D0 pi- with D0 --> K- pi+ events that were selected using a silicon vertex trigger.


pdgid: S041T
text:
Events are selected in which one B meson is fully reconstructed while the second Bmeson is reconstructed inclusively.


pdgid: S041S95
text:
URQUIJO 2007 report a measurement of (10.34+-023+-0.25)% for the partial branching fraction of B+ --> e+ nu_e X_c decay with electron energy above 0.6 GeV. We converted the result to B+ --> e+ nu_e X branching fraction.


pdgid: S041S95
text:
The measurements are obtained for charged and neutral B mesons partial rates of semileptonic decay to electrons with momentum above 0.6 GeV/c in the B rest frame. The best precision on the ratio is achieved for a momentum threshold of 1.0 GeV: B(B+ --> e+ nu_e X) / B(B0 --> e+ nu_e X) = 1.074+-0.041+-0.026.


pdgid: S041S95
text:
ARTUSO 1997 uses partial reconstruction of B --> D^* lepton nu_lepton and inclusive semileptonic branching ratio from BARISH 1996B (0.1049+-0.0017+-0.0043).


pdgid: S041S95
text:
The measurements are obtained for charged and neutral B mesons partial rates of semileptonic decay to electrons with momentum above 0.6 GeV/c in the B rest frame, and their ratio of B(B+ --> e+ nu_e X)/B(B0 --> e+ nu_e X) = 1.08+-0.05+-0.02.


pdgid: S041S00
text:
Measure the independent B+ and B0 partial branching fractions with electron threshold energies of 0.4 GeV.


pdgid: S041A53
text:
The correlation of 50% with B(B0 --> lepton+ nu_lepton X_u)(letpon energy in B rest   frame E(lepton)*** > 1 GeV) was reported.


pdgid: S041B04
text:
The relative branching fractions of B- --> D0 , D^*()0 , D^**()0 in the B- --> D0 X mu- nubar channel  are determined by fitting the distribution of the missing mass in Bbar_s2^*()0 --> B- K+ decays.


pdgid: S041D23
text:
Measures the lepton in a primary decay of the signal B meson, while tagging the partner B  in fully reconstructed hadronic decay modes.


pdgid: S041R69
text:
Measured using the dependence of B- --> D^*()0 e- nubar_e decay differential rate and the form factor description by CAPRINI 1998.


pdgid: S041R69
text:
ALBRECHT 1992C reports 0.058+-0.014+-0.013. We rescale using the method described in STONE 1994 but with the updated PDG 1994 B(D0 --> K- pi+).


pdgid: S041R69
text:
BARISH 1995 use B(D0 --> K- pi+) = (3.91+-0.08+-0.17)% and B(D^*()0 --> D0 pi0) = (63.6+-2.3+-3.3)%.


pdgid: S041R69
text:
Combining Dbar^*()0 lepton+ nu_lepton and Dbar^*()- lepton+ nu_lepton SANGHERA 1993 test V-A structure and fit the decay angular distributions to obtain A(FB) = 3/4*(Gamma**--Gamma**+)/Gamma = 0.14+-0.06+-0.03.  Assuming a value of V(cb), they measure V, A(1), and A(2), the three form factors for the D^* lepton nu_lepton decay, where results are slightly dependent on model assumptions.


pdgid: S041R69
text:
Assumes equal production of B0 Bbar0 and B+ B- at the Upsilon(4S). Uncorrected for D and D^* branching ratio assumptions.


pdgid: S041B06
text:
In this measurement of f(D^**()0) = B(B- -->(D^**()0 --> D0 X)mu- nubar)/B(B- --> D0 X mu- nubar),  D^**()0 refers collectively to L = 1 states D_{{0}}^*(2400), D_{{1}}(2420), D_{{1}}(2430), and  D_{{2}}^*(2460), as well as other resonances such as radially excited D mesons, and to  nonresonant contributions with additional pions.


pdgid: S041Q54
text:
LIVENTSEV 2008   reports 4.0+-0.4+-0.6E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D- pi+ lepton+ nu_lepton)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 lepton+ nu_lepton)] assuming B(B+ --> Dbar0 lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.15+-0.22E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(B+ --> Dbar0 lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.26+-0.07E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041Q54
text:
LIVENTSEV 2005   reports [G(B+ --> D- pi+ lepton+ nu_lepton)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton)] = 0.25+-0.03+-0.03 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.10+-0.07E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C07
text:
Uses a simultaneous fit of all B semileptonic decays without full reconstruction of events. AUBERT 2009Y reports B(B+ --> Dbar_2^*(2460)0 lepton+ nu_lepton) . B(Dbar_2^*(2460)0 --> D^(*)()- pi+) =  2.29+-0.23+-0.21E-3 and the authors have provided us the individual measurement.


pdgid: S041Q55
text:
LIVENTSEV 2008   reports 6.4+-0.8+-0.9E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D^*()- pi+ lepton+ nu_lepton)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 lepton+ nu_lepton)] assuming B(B+ --> Dbar0 lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.15+-0.22E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(B+ --> Dbar0 lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.26+-0.07E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041Q55
text:
LIVENTSEV 2005   reports [G(B+ --> D^*()- pi+ lepton+ nu_lepton)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- lepton+ nu_lepton)] = 0.12+-0.02+-0.02 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- lepton+ nu_lepton) = 4.87+-0.09E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041T70
text:
STYPULA 2012 provides also an upper limit of 0.56E-3 at 90% CL for the same data. Also measures branching fraction of the combined modes of D_s()- K+ lepton+ nu_lepton and D_s^*()- K+ lepton+ nu_lepton as B(B+ --> D_s^(*)()- K+ lepton+ nu_lepton) = 5.9+-1.2+-1.5E-4.


pdgid: S041Q53
text:
Uses loose neutrino reconstruction technique. Assumes B(Y(4S) --> B+ B-) = (51.6+-0.6)% and B(Y(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = (48.4+-0.6)%.


pdgid: S041Q53
text:
The signal events are tagged by a second B meson reconstructed in the semileptonic mode B --> D^(*)() lepton nu_lepton.


pdgid: S041Q53
text:
B+ and B0 decays combined assuming isospin symmetry. Systematic errors include both experimental and form-factor uncertainties.


pdgid: S041R70
text:
Derived based in the reported B0 result by assuming isospin symmetry: Gamma(B0 --> pi- lepton+ nu)= 2Gamma(B+ --> pi0 lepton+ nu).


pdgid: S041T10
text:
Uses missing-mass technique by fully reconstructing the hadronic decay chain of the accompanying  B.


pdgid: S041T10
text:
Uses loose neutrino reconstruction technique. Assumes B(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-) = (51.6+-0.6)% and  B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = (48.4+-0.6)%.


pdgid: S041T10
text:
The B0 and B+ results are combined assuming the isospin, B lifetimes, and relative charged/neutral B production at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S041T10
text:
ATHAR 2003 reports systematic errors 0.16+-0.09, which are experimental systematic and systematic due to model dependence. We combine these in quadrature.


pdgid: S041Q88
text:
The B0 and B+ results are combined assuming the isospin, B lifetimes, and relative charged/neutral B production at the Upsilon(4S). Corresponds to 90% CL interval (1.20 -- 4.46)xE-4.


pdgid: S041S47
text:
LEES 2013A  reports 1.21+-0.14+-0.08E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> omega lepton+ nu_lepton)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] assuming B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2.


pdgid: S041S47
text:
Uses semileptonic tagging. Assumes B(omega --> pi+ pi- pi0) = (89.2+-0.7)% and that the production ratio of B+ B- to B0 Bbar0 from Upsilon(4S) is 1.056+-0.028. The partial branching fractions in three bins of q**2 are also reported.


pdgid: S041S47
text:
BEAN 1993B limit set using ISGW Model.  Using isospin and the quark model to combine Gamma(rho0 lepton+ nu_lepton) and Gamma(rho- lepton+ nu_lepton) with this result, they obtain a limit <(1.6 -- 2.7)*10**-4 at 90% CL for B+ --> omega lepton+ nu_lepton. The range corresponds to the ISGW, WSB, and KS models.  An upper limit on |V(ub)/V(cb)| <0.8 -- 0.13 at 90% CL is derived as well.


pdgid: S041S48
text:
Derived based in the reported B0 result by assuming isospin symmetry: Gamma(B0 --> rho- lepton+ nu)= 2Gamma(B+ --> rho0 lepton+ nu)~~ 2Gamma(B+ --> omega lepton+ nu).


pdgid: S041S48
text:
BEAN 1993B limit set using ISGW Model.  Using isospin and the quark model to combine Gamma(omega0 lepton+ nu_lepton) and Gamma(rho- lepton+ nu_lepton) with this result, they obtain a limit <(1.6 -- 2.7)*10**-4 at 90% CL for B+ --> rho0 lepton+ nu_lepton. The range corresponds to the ISGW, WSB, and KS models.  An upper limit on |V(ub)/V(cb)| <0.8 -- 0.13 at 90% CL is derived as well.


pdgid: S041P88
text:
AAIJ 2020K  reports [G(B+ --> p pbar mu+ nu_mu)/G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 8.75+-0.39+-0.35E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041S56
text:
This is a 90% C.L. upper limit in the frequentist approach. The corresponding upper limit in  the Bayesian approach is <8.9E-7. A 2.8 standard deviation signal above the background  is found, with a measured branching fraction 5.3+-2.0+-0.9E-7.


pdgid: S041S56
text:
This is a 90% confidence interval in the frequentist approach. A 2.4 standard deviation  signal above the background is found, with a measured branching fraction 6.46+-2.22+-1.60E-7.


pdgid: S041S57
text:
The authors combine their result with that from HARA 2010 obtaining B(B- --> tau- nubar_tau)=0.96+-0.26E-4 and  deriving f_{{B}} |V_(ub)|=7.4+-0.8+-0.5E-4 GeV.


pdgid: S041S57
text:
Requires a fully reconstructed hadronic B-decay in the recoil. Reports that this result combined with AUBERT 2010E value gives B(B- --> tau- nubar_tau) = 1.79+-0.48E-4.


pdgid: S041S57
text:
Requires one reconstructed semileptonic B decay B- --> D^(*)()0 lepton- nubar_lepton X in the recoil.


pdgid: S041S57
text:
The analysis is based on a sample of events with one fully reconstructed tag B in a hadronic decay mode B- --> D^(*)()0 X-.


pdgid: S041S57
text:
BUSKULIC 1995 uses same missing-energy technique as in bbar --> tau+ nu_tau X, but analysis is restricted to endpoint region of missing-energy distribution.


pdgid: S041B9
text:
BROWDER 1997 uses the hermiticity of the CLEOII detector to reconstruct the neutrino energy and momentum.


pdgid: S041B10
text:
Note that the value given by AUBERT 2009AT is 24E-6 in the paper abstract, and 26E-6 in the  paper itself (Table I).


pdgid: S041P68
text:
AAIJ 2019P limit established for the kinematic region where the lower of the two M(mu+ mu-) is less  than 980 MeV/c**2.


pdgid: S041Q24
text:
Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.


pdgid: S041R1
text:
ABULENCIA 2006J  reports [G(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- pi+)] = 1.97+-0.10+-0.21 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.51+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R1
text:
AHMED 2002B reports an additional uncertainty on the branching ratios to account for 4.5% uncertainty on relative production of B0 and B+, which is not included here.


pdgid: S041R1
text:
Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses the MarkIII branching fractions for the D.


pdgid: S041R1
text:
BEBEK 1987 value has been updated in BERKELMAN 1991 to use same assumptions as noted for BORTOLETTO 1992.


pdgid: S041R1
text:
AUBERT,B 2004P  reports [G(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+)/G(total)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = 1.846+-0.032+-0.097E-4 which we divide by our best value B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.945+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R1
text:
ALAM 1994 assume equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the CLEOII absolute B(D0 --> K- pi+) and the PDG 1992 B(D0 --> K- pi+ pi0)/B(D0 --> K- pi+) and B(D0 --> K- 2pi+ pi-)/B(D0 --> K- pi+).


pdgid: S041B97
text:
Reports a double ratio of B(B+ --> D_CP(+1)() K+ )/B(B+ --> D_CP(+1)() pi+)  and  B(B+ --> Dbar0 K+ )/B(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+), 1.13+-0.16+-0.08. We multiply by our best value of  B(B+ --> Dbar0 K+ )/B(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+) = 0.083+-0.006. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B97
text:
ABE 2006   reports [G(B+ --> D_CP(+1) K+)/G(B+ --> D_CP(+1) pi+)] / [[G(B+ --> Dbar0 K+)G(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+)]] = 1.13+-0.06+-0.08 which we multiply by our best value [G(B+ --> Dbar0 K+)]G(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+)] = 0.0789+-0.0027. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C18
text:
Reports R(CP+) = 2 (B(B- --> D_CP(+1)() K-) + B(B+ --> D_CP(+1)() K+)) /  (B(B- --> D0 K-) + B(B+ --> Dbar0 K+)) = 1.30+-0.24+-0.12 that we have divided by 2.


pdgid: S041B98
text:
Reports a double ratio of B(B+ --> D_CP(-1)() K+ )/B(B+ --> D_CP(-1)() pi+)  and  B(B+ --> Dbar0 K+ )/B(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+), 1.17+-0.14+-0.14. We multiply by our best value of  B(B+ --> Dbar0 K+ )/B(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+) = 0.083+-0.006. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B98
text:
CP=-1 eigenstate of D0 Dbar0 system is reconstructed via K0S pi0, K0S omega, K0S phi, K0S eta, and K0S eta^'.


pdgid: S041Q12
text:
AAIJ 2021Q  reports the charge-averaged rate, where the statistical and systematic  uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the observables. The  individual ratio of B- --> [ K+ pi- ]_D K- and B- --> [ K- pi+ ]_D K- and  the ratio of B+ --> [ K- pi+ ]_D K+ and B+ --> [ K+ pi- ]_D K+  are also reported to be 9.5+-0.5+-0.3E-3 and 25.2+-0.8+-0.4E-3, respectively.


pdgid: S041Q12
text:
AALTONEN 2011AJ also measures the ratio separately for B+ (R**+(K)) and B- (R**-(K)) and obtains: R**+(K) = 42.6+-13.7+-2.8E-3, R**-(K) = 3.8+-10.3+-2.7E-3.


pdgid: S041Q12
text:
AUBERT 2005G extract a constraint on the magnitude of the ratio of amplitudes |A(B+ --> D0 K+) / A(B+ --> Dbar0 K+)| < 0.23 at 90% CL (Bayesian). Similar measurements from B+ --> D^*()0 K+ are also reported.


pdgid: S041Q12
text:
SAIGO 2005 extract a constraint on the magnitude of the ratio of amplitudes |A(B+ --> D0 K+) / A(B+ --> Dbar0 K+)| < 0.27 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S041Q12
text:
AUBERT,B 2004L extract a constraint on the magnitude of the ratio of amplitudes |A(B+ --> D0 K+)/A(B+ --> Dbar0 K+)| < 0.22 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S041Q89
text:
Extracts a constraint on the magnitude of the ratio of amplitudes |A(B+ --> D0 K+)/ A(B+ --> Dbar0 K+)| < 0.13 at 95% CL.


pdgid: S041Q89
text:
Extracts a constraint on the magnitude of the ratio of amplitudes |A(B+ --> D0 K+)/ A(B+ --> Dbar0 K+)| < 0.19 at 95% CL.


pdgid: S041Q49
text:
AAIJ 2021Q gives the charge-averaged rate, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties  have been combined according to the correlations between the observables. The individual ratio of  B- --> [ K+ pi- ]_D K- and B- --> [ K- pi+ ]_D K- and  the ratio of B+ --> [ K- pi+ ]_D pi+ and B+ --> [ K+ pi- ]_D pi+ are also  reported to be 4.15+-0.08+-0.04E-3 and 3.20+-0.07+-0.04E-3, respectively.


pdgid: S041Q49
text:
AALTONEN 2011AJ also measures the ratio separately for B+ (R**+(pi)) and B- (R**-(pi)) and obtains: R**+(pi) = 2.4+-1.0+-0.4E-3, R**-(K) = 3.1+-1.1+-0.4E-3.


pdgid: S041QD0
text:
AAIJ 2021Q gives the charge-averaged rate, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties  have been combined according to the correlations between the observables. The individual ratio of  B- --> ([ K+ pi- ]_D pi0 )_D^* pi- to B- --> ([ K- pi+ ]_D pi0 )_D^* pi- and the  ratio of B+ --> ([ K- pi+ ]_D pi0 )_D^* pi+ to B+ --> ([ K+ pi- ]_D pi0 )_D^* pi+, without  inclusion of the neutral pion in the reconstruction, are also reported to be 4.05+-0.56+-0.59E-3 and  5.36+-0.56+-0.58E-3, respectively.


pdgid: S041QD1
text:
AAIJ 2021Q gives the charge-averaged rate, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties  have been combined according to the correlations between the observables. The individual the ratio  of B- --> ([ K+ pi- ]_D gamma )_D^* pi- to B- --> ([ K- pi+ ]_D gamma )_D^* pi-  and the ratio of B+ --> ([ K- pi+ ]_D gamma )_D^* pi+ to  B+ --> ([ K+ pi- ]_D gamma )_D^* pi+, without inclusion of  the photon in the reconstruction, are also reported to be 4.72+-0.92+-1.18E-3 and  4.03+-0.91+-1.14E-3, respectively.


pdgid: S041QD2
text:
AAIJ 2021Q gives the charge-averaged rate, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties  have been combined according to the correlations between the observables. The individual ratio of  B- --> ([ K+ pi- ]_D pi0 )_D^* K- to B- --> ([ K- pi+ ]_D pi0 )_D^* K-  and the ratio of B+ --> ([ K- pi+ ]_D pi0 )_D^* K+ to B+ --> ([ K+ pi- ]_D pi0 )_D^* K+,  without inclusion of the neutral pion in the reconstruction, are also reported to be  20.2+-3.5+-2.3E-3 and 3.3+-3.5+-2.2E-3, respectively.


pdgid: S041QD3
text:
AAIJ 2021Q gives the charge-averaged rate, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties  have been combined according to the correlations between the observables. The individual ratio of  B- --> ([ K+ pi- ]_D gamma )_D^* K- to B- --> ([ K- pi+ ]_D gamma )_D^* K- and  the ratio of B+ --> ([ K- pi+ ]_D gamma )_D^* K+ to B+ --> ([ K+ pi- ]_D gamma )_D^* K+,  without inclusion of the photon in the reconstruction, are also reported to be 11.7+-21.5+-31.3E-3 and  29.2+-21.4+-31.2E-3, respectively.


pdgid: S041Q61
text:
The authors report R(CP-)= 1.03+-0.27+-0.13 which is, assuming CP conservation, twice the value of the quoted above branching ratio,


pdgid: S041Q61
text:
The authors report R(CP-)= 0.65+-0.26+-0.08 which is, assuming CP conservation, twice the value of the quoted above branching ratio.


pdgid: S041Q62
text:
Measures the ratio separately for K+ K- and pi+ pi- final states, R(K K) =  1.22+-0.09+-0.02 and R(pi pi) = 1.08+-0.14+-0.03, and combines the two  results.


pdgid: S041Q62
text:
The authors report R(CP+)= 2.17+-0.35+-0.09 which is, assuming CP conservation, twice the value of the quoted above branching ratio,


pdgid: S041Q62
text:
Measures the ratio separately for K+ K- and pi+ pi- final states, R(K K) = 1.22+-0.09+-0.01 and R(pi pi) = 1.08+-0.14+-0.03, and combines the two results.


pdgid: S041Q62
text:
The authors report R(CP+)= 1.96+-0.40+-0.11 which is, assuming CP conservation, twice the value of the quoted above branching ratio.


pdgid: S041B64
text:
ADACHI 2024L  reports 3.64+-0.32+-0.16E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar0 K+ Kbar0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-)] assuming B(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-) = 51.6+-1.2E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-) = 51.4+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B64
text:
DRUTSKOY 2002   reports 5.5+-1.4+-0.8E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar0 K+ Kbar0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-)] assuming B(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-) = 50+-0E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-) = 51.4+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R85
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses MarkIII branching fractions for the D.


pdgid: S041B54
text:
Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S). The signal is consistent with all observed omega pi+ having proceeded through the rho^'+ resonance at mass 1349+-25+10-5 MeV and width 547+-86+46-45 MeV.


pdgid: S041R2
text:
ALAM 1994 assume equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the CLEOII B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) and absolute B(D0 --> K- pi+) and the PDG 1992 B(D0 --> K- pi+ pi0)/B(D0 --> K- pi+) and B(D0 --> K- 2pi+ pi-)/B(D0 --> K- pi+).


pdgid: S041R2
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses MarkIII branching fractions for the D and D^*(2010). The authors also find the product branching fraction into D^** pi followed by D^** --> D^*(2010) pi to be 0.0014+0.0008-0.0006+-0.0003 where D^** represents all orbitally excited D mesons.


pdgid: S041R2
text:
ALBRECHT 1987C use PDG 1986 branching ratios for D and D^*(2010) and assume B(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-) = 55% and B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 45%. Superseded by ALBRECHT 1990J.


pdgid: S041P42
text:
The branching fraction of the normalization mode B+ --> D^*()- pi+ pi+ is rescaled to the  updated ratio of Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B- to Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0 decay rates of 1.058+-0.024.


pdgid: S041C69
text:
AAIJ 2011E  reports 9.3+-1.6+-0.9E-2 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar_1(2420)0 pi+  ,  Dbar_1()0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+)/G(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+ pi+ pi-)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2.


pdgid: S041R14
text:
ALAM 1994 assume equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the MarkIII B(D+ --> K- 2pi+).


pdgid: S041R14
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses MarkIII branching fractions for the D. The product branching fraction into D_0^*(2340) pi followed by D_0^*(2340) --> D pi is <0.005 at 90%CL and into D_{{2}}^*(2460) followed by D_2^*(2460) --> D pi is <0.004 at 90%CL.


pdgid: S041R14
text:
BEBEK 1987 assume the Upsilon(4S) decays 43% to B0 Bbar0. B(D- --> K+ pi- pi-) = (9.1+-1.3+-0.4)% is assumed.


pdgid: S041R15
text:
AUBERT,BE 2006J  reports [G(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+)] = 1.14+-0.07+-0.04 which we multiply by our best value B(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+) = 4.61+-0.10E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R15
text:
BRANDENBURG 1998 assume equal production of B+ and B0 at Upsilon(4S) and use the D^* reconstruction technique.  The first error is their experiment's error and the second error is the systematic error from the PDG 1996 value of B(D^* --> D pi).


pdgid: S041R15
text:
ALAM 1994 assume equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the CLEOII B(D^*(2007)0 --> D0 pi0) and absolute B(D0 --> K- pi+) and the PDG 1992 B(D0 --> K- pi+ pi0)/B(D0 --> K- pi+) and B(D0 --> K- 2pi+ pi-)/B(D0 --> K- pi+).


pdgid: S041R15
text:
Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses MarkIII branching fractions for the D and D^*(2010).


pdgid: S041R15
text:
This is a derived branching ratio, using the inclusive pion spectrum and other two-body B decays. BEBEK 1987 assume the Upsilon(4S) decays 43% to B0 Bbar0.


pdgid: S041S41
text:
Assumes equal production of B0 and B+ at the Upsilon(4S) resonance. The second error combines the systematic and theoretical uncertainties in quadrature.


pdgid: S041S41
text:
ALAM 1994 assume equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the CLEOII B(D^*(2007)0 --> D0 pi0) and absolute B(D0 --> K- pi+) and the PDG 1992 B(D0 --> K- pi+ pi0)/B(D0 --> K- pi+) and B(D0 --> K- 2pi+ pi-)/B(D0 --> K- pi+). The nonresonant pi+ pi0 contribution under the rho+ is negligible.


pdgid: S041B48
text:
AUBERT 2005N  reports [G(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 K+)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+)] = 0.0813+-0.0040+0.0042-0.0031 which we multiply by our best value B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+) = 5.17+-0.15E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B48
text:
ABE 2001I  reports [G(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 K+)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+)] = 0.078+-0.019+-0.009 which we multiply by our best value B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+) = 5.17+-0.15E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C47
text:
AUBERT 2008BF reports [G(B+ --> Dbar_CP(+1)^*()0 K+)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 K+)] = 0.655+-0.065+-0.020 which we multiply by our best value B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 K+) = 4.19+0.31-0.28E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041P52
text:
Uses semi-inclusive reconstruction of B+ --> ([ K+ pi- ]_D gamma / pi0 )_D^* K+ / pi+.  Decays of D^* --> D gamma / pi0 are reconstructed without inclusion of pi0 or gamma.


pdgid: S041Q71
text:
Reports a double ratio of  B(B+ --> D_CP(+1)^*()0 K+ )/B(B+ --> D_CP(+1)^*()0 pi+) and  B(B+ --> Dbar^*()0 K+ )/B(B+ --> Dbar^*()0 pi+),  1.41+-0.25+-0.06. We multiply by our best value of  B(B+ --> Dbar^*()0 K+ )/B(B+ --> Dbar^*()0 pi+) = 0.080+-0.011. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C48
text:
AUBERT 2008BF reports [G(B+ --> Dbar_CP(-1)^*()0 K+)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 K+)] = 0.55+-0.06+-0.02 which we multiply by our best value B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 K+) = 4.19+0.31-0.28E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041Q81
text:
Reports a double ratio of B(B+ --> D^*_CP(-1)()0 K+ )/B(B+ --> D^*_CP(-1)()0 pi+)  and  B(B+ --> Dbar^*()0 K+ )/B(B+ --> Dbar^*()0 pi+), 1.15+-0.31+-0.12. We multiply by our best value of  B(B+ --> Dbar^*()0 K+ )/B(B+ --> Dbar^*()0 pi+) = 0.080+-0.011. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041S92
text:
The three pion mass is required to be between 1.0 and 1.6 GeV consistent with an a_{{1}} meson. (If this channel is dominated by a_{{1}}()+, the branching ratio for Dbar^*()0 a_1()+ is twice that for Dbar^*()0 pi+ pi+ pi-.)


pdgid: S041S96
text:
ALAM 1994 value is twice their Gamma(Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+ pi+ pi-)/Gamma(total) value based on their observation that the three pions are dominantly in the a_{{1}}(1260) mass range 1.0 to 1.6 GeV.


pdgid: S041B15
text:
BRANDENBURG 1998 assume equal production of B+ and B0 at Upsilon(4S) and use the D^* partial reconstruction technique.  The first error is their experiment's error and the second error is the systematic error from the PDG 1996 value of B(D^* --> D pi).


pdgid: S041R12
text:
Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses MarkIII branching fractions for the D.


pdgid: S041R12
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J  reports 0.018+-0.007+-0.005 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D^*(2010)- pi+ pi+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R03
text:
AUBERT,BE 2006J  reports [G(B+ --> Dbar^**0() pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+)] = 1.22+-0.13+-0.23 which we multiply by our best value B(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+) = 4.61+-0.10E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R93
text:
ALAM 1994 assume equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the CLEOII B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) and absolute B(D0 --> K- pi+) and the PDG 1992 B(D0 --> K- pi+ pi0)/B(D0 --> K- pi+) and assuming B(D_1(2420)0 --> D^*(2010)+ pi-) = 67%.


pdgid: S041R93
text:
ALBRECHT 1994D assume equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the CLEOII B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) assuming B(D_1(2420)0 --> D^*(2010)+ pi-) = 67%.


pdgid: S041R94
text:
ALAM 1994 assume equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the CLEOII B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) assuming B(D_1(2420)0 --> D^*(2010)+ pi-) = 67%.


pdgid: S041R91
text:
ALAM 1994 assume equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the MarkIII B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) and B(D_2^*(2460)0 --> D+ pi-) = 30%.


pdgid: S041R91
text:
ALAM 1994 assume equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the MarkIII B(D+ --> K- 2pi+), the CLEOII B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) and B(D_2^*(2460)0 --> D^*(2010)+ pi-) = 20%.


pdgid: S041R91
text:
ALBRECHT 1994D assume equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the CLEOII B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) and B(D_2^*(2460)0 --> D^*(2010)+ pi-) = 30%.


pdgid: S041R39
text:
AUBERT 2006N  reports 0.92+-0.14+-0.18E-2 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar0 D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.0462+-0.0062, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R39
text:
GIBAUT 1996   reports 0.0126+-0.0022+-0.0025 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar0 D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R39
text:
ALBRECHT 1992G  reports 0.024+-0.012+-0.004 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar0 D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R39
text:
BORTOLETTO 1990   reports 0.029+-0.013 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar0 D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.02, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C4
text:
CHOI 2015A  reports 8.0+1.3-1.2+-1.1+-0.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s0^*(2317)+ Dbar0  ,  D_s0^*()+ --> D_s()+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.39+-0.21E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.45+-0.08E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C4
text:
AUBERT,B 2004S  reports 1.0+-0.3+0.4-0.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s0^*(2317)+ Dbar0  ,  D_s0^*()+ --> D_s()+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C4
text:
KROKOVNY 2003B  reports 0.81+0.30-0.27+-0.24E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s0^*(2317)+ Dbar0  ,  D_s0^*()+ --> D_s()+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C5
text:
AUBERT,B 2004S  reports [G(B+ --> D_sJ(2457)+ Dbar0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0)] = 2.2+0.8-0.7+-0.3E-3 which we divide by our best value B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0) = 48+-11E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C5
text:
KROKOVNY 2003B  reports [G(B+ --> D_sJ(2457)+ Dbar0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0)] = 1.0+0.5-0.4+-0.1E-3 which we divide by our best value B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0) = 48+-11E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041Q21
text:
AUBERT,B 2004S  reports 0.6+-0.2+0.2-0.1E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_sJ(2457)+ Dbar()0   x  D_sJ(2457)+ --> D_s()+ gamma)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041Q21
text:
KROKOVNY 2003B  reports 0.56+0.16-0.15+-0.17E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_sJ(2457)+ Dbar()0   x  D_sJ(2457)+ --> D_s()+ gamma)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041Q20
text:
AUBERT,B 2004S  reports [G(B+ --> D_sJ(2457)+ Dbar^*(2007)0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0)] = 7.6+-1.7+3.2-2.4E-3 which we divide by our best value B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0) = 48+-11E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C63
text:
Uses Gamma(D^*(2007)0 --> D0 pi0) / Gamma(D^*(2007)0 --> D0 gamma) = 1.74+-0.13 and Gamma(D_s1(2536)+ --> D^*(2007)0 K+) / Gamma(D_s1(2536)+ --> D^*(2010)+ K0) = 1.36+-0.2.


pdgid: S041S49
text:
AUBERT 2006N  reports 0.77+-0.15+-0.13E-2 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar0 D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.0462+-0.0062, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041S49
text:
GIBAUT 1996   reports 0.0087+-0.0027+-0.0017 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar0 D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041S49
text:
ALBRECHT 1992G  reports 0.016+-0.012+-0.003 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar0 D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041A95
text:
Uses simultaneous fits of Bbar0 --> Dbar0 D_s()+ pi- and B+ --> D- D_s()+ pi+ amplitudes  assuming isospin symmetry.


pdgid: S041S50
text:
AUBERT 2006N  reports 0.76+-0.15+-0.13E-2 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.0462+-0.0062, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041S50
text:
GIBAUT 1996   reports 0.0140+-0.0043+-0.0035 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041S50
text:
ALBRECHT 1992G  reports 0.013+-0.009+-0.002 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041S50
text:
Assumes PDG 1990 D0 and D^*(2007)0 branching ratios, e.g., B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.71+-0.25% and B(D^*(2007)0 --> D0 pi0) = 55+-6%.


pdgid: S041S51
text:
AUBERT 2006N  reports 1.62+-0.22+-0.18E-2 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.0462+-0.0062, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041S51
text:
GIBAUT 1996   reports 0.0310+-0.0088+-0.0065 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041S51
text:
ALBRECHT 1992G  reports 0.031+-0.016+-0.005 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B39
text:
AHMED 2000B reports their experiment's uncertainties (+-0.78+-0.48+-0.68)%, where the first error is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is the uncertainty in the D_s --> phi pi branching fraction. We combine the first two in quadrature.


pdgid: S041D48
text:
The NR(0-+) line shapes is described by f(R)(m) =  e**(alpha+beta i)/(m^2-m_{{0}}^2) with m(0) = 4.35 GeV. The  parameters alpha and beta are determined from the fit to the data.


pdgid: S041A94
text:
AAIJ 2023AI report that the last error is due to the uncertainties on the branching fractions  of the D_s()+- --> K-+ K+- pi+- and D+- --> K-+ pi+- pi+- decays.


pdgid: S041S83
text:
AUBERT 2007M  reports [G(B+ --> D_s()+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 7.0+2.4-2.1+0.6-0.8E-7 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041S83
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <2.0E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S62
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <0.9E-3 from a measurement of [[G(B+ --> D_s()+ pi0)/G(total)+ G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S84
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <3.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S85
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <4.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ eta)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S86
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <7.5E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ eta)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S87
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <3.7E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ rho0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S60
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <3.4E-3 from a measurement of [[G(B+ --> D_s()+ rho0)/G(total)+ G(B+ --> D_s()+ Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S88
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <4.8E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ rho0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S61
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <2.0E-3 from a measurement of [[G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ rho0)/G(total)+ G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S63
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <4.8E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ omega)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S63
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <3.4E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ omega)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S64
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <6.8E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ omega)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S64
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <1.9E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ omega)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S65
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <3.0E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ a_1(1260)0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S66
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <2.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ a_1(1260)0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041P49
text:
AAIJ 2018B  reports [G(B+ --> D_s()+ K+ K-)/G(B+ --> Dbar0 D_s()+)] / [B(D0 --> K+ K-)] = 0.197+-0.015+-0.017 which we multiply by our best value B(D0 --> K+ K-) = 4.08+-0.06E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041S67
text:
AAIJ 2013R  reports 1.87+1.25-0.73+-0.19+-0.32E-6 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ phi)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D_s()+)] assuming B(B+ --> Dbar0 D_s()+) = 10.0+-1.7E-3, which we rescale to our best value B(B+ --> Dbar0 D_s()+) = 9.3+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041S67
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <1.7E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ phi)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S67
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <3.1E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ phi)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S68
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <2.1E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ phi)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S68
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <4.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ phi)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S69
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <2.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ Kbar0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S69
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <10.3E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ Kbar0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S70
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <3.1E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ Kbar0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S70
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <10.9E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ Kbar0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S89
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <4.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S90
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <4.3E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S71
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <1.1E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()- pi+ K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S72
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <1.6E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()- pi+ K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S73
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <8.6E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()- pi+ K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S74
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <1.1E-2 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()- pi+ K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041B40
text:
CHILIKIN 2019   reports [G(B+ --> eta_c K+)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)] = 39.4+4.1-3.9+2.2-1.8E-7 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-) = 3.7+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B40
text:
The ratio of B(B+- --> K+- eta_c) B(eta_c --> K Kbar pi) = 7.4+-0.5+-0.7E-5 reported in AUBERT,B 2004B and B(B+- --> K+- eta_c) = 8.7+-1.5E-3 reported in AUBERT 2006E contribute to the determination of B(eta_c --> K Kbar pi), which is used by others for normalization.


pdgid: S041B40
text:
AUBERT,B 2005L  reports [G(B+ --> eta_c K+)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)] = 1.8+0.3-0.2+-0.2E-6 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar) = 1.33+-0.11E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B40
text:
AUBERT,B 2004B  reports [G(B+ --> eta_c K+)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)] = 0.074+-0.005+-0.007E-3 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi) = 7.1+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B40
text:
EDWARDS 2001 assumes equal production of B0 and B+ at the Upsilon(4S). The correlated uncertainties (28.3)% from B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c) in those modes have been accounted for.


pdgid: S041Q96
text:
AUBERT 2007AV reports [G(B+ --> eta_c K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)] = 1.57+0.56-0.46+0.45-0.36E-6 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar) = 1.33+-0.11E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041BA2
text:
Measured relative to B+ --> J/psi K+ decay with charmonia reconstructed in p pbar final  state and using B(B+ --> J/psi K+) * B(J/psi --> p pbar)= 2.17+-0.08E-6. The last uncertainty includes the uncertainty of B(B+ --> J/psi K+) *  B(J/psi --> p pbar).


pdgid: S041BA2
text:
Measured relative to B+ --> J/psi K+ decay with charmonia reconstructed in p pbar final state and using B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.013+-0.034E-3 and B(J/psi --> p pbar) = 2.17+-0.07E-3.


pdgid: S041C65
text:
The first uncertainty includes both statistical and interference effects while the second is due to systematics.


pdgid: S041R3
text:
CHOUDHURY 2021 uses the relative production fraction of charged (f**+-) to neutral  (f**00) B mesons at Upsilon(4S) value of f**+-/f**00 = 1.058+-0.024.


pdgid: S041R3
text:
CHILIKIN 2019   reports [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)] = 56.4+3.3-3.2+2.7-2.5E-7 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-) = 6.0+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R3
text:
AUBERT,B 2005L  reports [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 2.2+-0.2+-0.1E-6 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R3
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 8+-2+-2E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R3
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J  reports 7+-3+-1E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041Q06
text:
AAIJ 2013S  reports [G(B+ --> eta_c K+)/G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 0.578+-0.035+-0.026 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar) = 1.33+-0.11E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S041R19
text:
ACOSTA 2002F uses as reference of B(B --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 10.1+-0.6E-4. The second error includes the systematic error and the uncertainties of the branching ratio.


pdgid: S041R19
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 1.2+-0.6+-0.4E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R19
text:
ALBRECHT 1987D  reports 1.2+-0.8E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R19
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J  reports <1.6E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971E-2.


pdgid: S041C3
text:
AUBERT 2006   reports [G(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] = 10.1+-2.5+-1.0E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C3
text:
AUBERT 2005R  reports [G(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] = 12.8+-4.1E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C3
text:
CHOI 2003   reports [G(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] = 13.6+-3.0+-0.5E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041P98
text:
AUBERT 2009B  reports [G(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi)] < 4.8E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi) = 10E-3.


pdgid: S041Q52
text:
Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S). The isovector-X hypothesis is excluded with a likelihood test at 1E-4 level.


pdgid: S041C85
text:
BALA 2015   reports [G(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K0 pi+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] = 10.6+-3.0+-0.9E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R65
text:
AUBERT 2007AV reports [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 3.78+0.72-0.64+0.28-0.23E-6 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R65
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 1.3+-0.9+-0.3E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R65
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J  reports 1.6+-1.1+-0.3E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041S98
text:
JESSOP 1997 assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S). The measurement is actually measured as an average over kaon charged and neutral states.


pdgid: S041A67
text:
AAIJ 2023AK measurements last uncertainty includes +-0.07 uncertainties on the branching  fractions of the intermediate resonances.


pdgid: S041B43
text:
ANASTASSOV 2000 finds 10 events on a background of 0.5+-0.2.  Assumes equal production of B0 and B+ at the Upsilon(4S), a uniform Dalitz plot distribution, isotropic J/psi(1S) and phi decays, and B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) phi K+)= B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) phi K0).


pdgid: S041T94
text:
Reported a threshold enhancement in the J/psi phi mass distribution consistent with the chi_{{c1}}(4140) state with a statistical significance of 3.1 standard deviations.


pdgid: S041C1
text:
SIRUNYAN 2019CM reports B(B+ --> J/psi Lambdabar p)/B(B+ --> J/psi K^*(892)) =  1.054+-0.057+-0.035+-0.011E-2 and rescaled with the best value of B(B+ --> J/psi K^*(892))  =1.43+-0.08E-3, where the last uncertainty is the uncertainty from the branching fractions of  Lambdabar and K^*(892) to reconstructed final states.


pdgid: S041B46
text:
AAIJ 2013S  reports [G(B+ --> psi(2S) K+)/G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] * [B(psi(2S) --> p pbar)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 0.080+-0.012+-0.009 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> p pbar) = 2.94+-0.09E-4, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S041B46
text:
Assumes B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) / B(psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = B(J/psi --> e+ e-) / B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.69+-0.19.


pdgid: S041B46
text:
AAIJ 2012L  reports 0.594+-0.006+-0.016+-0.015 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> psi(2S) K+)/G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] / [B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.94+-0.06E-2,B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.72+-0.17E-3, which we rescale to our best values B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2, B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.94+-0.22E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S041P29
text:
Measured using B+ --> psi(2S) K+ as a normalization channel. The second error represents total systematic uncertainties including those from branching fractions which were taken from  PDG 2016 as B(phi --> K+ K-) = 0.489+-0.005 and B(B+ --> psi(2S) K+) = 6.26+-0.24E-4.


pdgid: S041P29
text:
An upper limit on the fraction of the non-phi component in B+ --> psi(2S) K+ K- K+ decays  is set as 0.26 at the 95% confidence level.


pdgid: S041A20
text:
AAIJ 2020AI reports [G(B+ --> psi(3770) K+)/G(B+ --> D- D+ K+)] * [B(psi(3770) --> D+ D-)] = 14.5+-1.2+-0.8E-2 which we divide by our best value B(psi(3770) --> D+ D-) = 41+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041P44
text:
Measured relative to B+ --> J/psi K+ decay with charmonia reconstructed in p pbar final  state and using B(B+ --> J/psi K+) * B(J/psi --> p pbar) = 2.17+-0.08E-6.


pdgid: S041C88
text:
AAIJ 2022D  reports [G(B+ --> psi(4040) K+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(4040) --> J/psi eta)] = 8.53+-2.35+-0.30E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(4040) --> J/psi eta) = 5.2+-0.7E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C88
text:
IWASHITA 2014   reports [G(B+ --> psi(4040) K+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(4040) --> J/psi eta)] < 15.5E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(4040) --> J/psi eta) = 5.2E-3.


pdgid: S041T97
text:
AAIJ 2013BC reports [Gamma(B+ --> psi(4160) K+)]/Gamma(total)] x  B(psi(4160) --> mu+ mu-) = 3.5+0.9-0.8E-9 which we devide by our best value B(psi(4160) --> e+ e-) =   assuming lepton universality. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041T97
text:
AAIJ 2013BC reports [G(B+ --> psi(4160) K+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(4160) --> e+ e-)] = 3.5+0.9-0.8E-9 which we divide by our best value B(psi(4160) --> e+ e-) = 6.9+-3.3E-6. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
CHILIKIN 2019   reports [G(B+ --> chi_c0() K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)] = 3.7+1.2-1.0+0.2-0.3E-7 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-) = 2.1+-0.7E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
LEES 2011I  reports [G(B+ --> chi_c0() K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> pi pi)] = 1.53+-0.66+-0.27E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c0(1P) --> pi pi) = 8.6+-0.4E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
AUBERT 2008AI reports 0.70+-0.10+0.12-0.10E-6 for B(B+ --> chi_c0() K+) x B(chi_c0() --> pi+ pi-). We compute B(B+ --> chi_c0() K+) using the PDG value B(chi_c0() --> pi pi)= and 2/3 for the pi+ pi- fraction. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is  systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
AUBERT 2008AI reports [G(B+ --> chi_c0() K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> pi pi)] = 1.05+-0.15+0.18-0.15E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c0(1P) --> pi pi) = 8.6+-0.4E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
AUBERT,BE 2006M  reports [G(B+ --> chi_c0() K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] = 6.1+-2.6+-1.1E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 1.41+-0.09E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
AAIJ 2013S  reports [G(B+ --> chi_c0() K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar)] < 6E-8 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar) = 2.21E-4.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
WICHT 2008   reports [G(B+ --> chi_c0() K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma gamma)] < 0.11E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma gamma) = 2.06E-4.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
AUBERT,B 2005N reports 0.66+-0.22+-0.08E-6 for B(B+ --> chi_c()0 K+) x B(chi_c()0 --> pi+ pi-). We compute B(B+ --> chi_c()0 K+) using the PDG value B(chi_c()0 --> pi+ pi-) = 7.1+-0.6E-3 and 2/3 for the pi+ pi- fraction.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
The measurement performed using decay channels chi_c0() --> pi+ pi- and chi_c0() --> K+ K-. The ratio of the branching ratios for these channels is found to be consistent with world average.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
AUBERT 2004P reports B(B+ --> chi_c0() K+)xB(chi_c0() --> pi+ pi-) = 1.5+-0.4+-0.1E-6 and used PDG value of B(chi_c0() --> pi pi) = 7.4+-0.8E-3 and Clebsh-Gordan coefficient to compute B(B+- -> chi_c0() K+).


pdgid: S041B41
text:
ABE 2002B measures the ratio of B(B+ --> chi_c0() K+)/B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 0.60+0.21-0.18+-0.05+-0.08, where the third error is due to the uncertainty in the B(chi_c0() --> pi+ pi-), and uses B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 10.0+-1.0E-4 to obtain the result.


pdgid: S041D05
text:
The second uncertainty includes systematic and reference branching reaction of  B+ --> J/psi K+  uncertainties.


pdgid: S041R90
text:
CHILIKIN 2019   reports [G(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)] = 4.7+1.3-1.2+0.4-0.2E-7 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-) = 5.0+-1.9E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R90
text:
AUBERT,BE 2006M  reports [G(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] = 1.76+-0.07+-0.12E-4 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R90
text:
AUBERT 2002   reports 7.5+-0.9+-0.8E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B47
text:
AUBERT 2002   reports 0.75+-0.08+-0.05 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K+)/G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C73
text:
LEES 2012B  reports 0.501+-0.024+-0.028 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K0 pi+)/G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K0 pi+)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.4+-1.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B24
text:
WICHT 2008   reports [G(B+ --> eta^' K+)/G(total)] * [B(eta^'(958) --> gamma gamma)] = 1.40+0.16-0.15+0.15-0.12E-6 which we divide by our best value B(eta^'(958) --> gamma gamma) = 2.307+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B21
text:
WICHT 2008   reports [G(B+ --> eta K+)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] = 0.87+0.16-0.15+0.10-0.07E-6 which we divide by our best value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041T03
text:
AUBERT 2008AI reports [G(B+ --> f_0(1500) K+)/G(total)] * [B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi)] = 1.095+-0.315+0.705-0.72E-6 which we divide by our best value B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi) = 34.5+-2.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041T03
text:
AUBERT 2008AI reports B(B+ --> f_0(1500) K+) . B(f_0(1500) --> pi+ pi-) = 0.73+-0.21+0.47-0.48E-6. We divide this result by our best value of B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi) =  multiplied by 2/3 to account for the pi+ pi- fraction. Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best value.


pdgid: S041T03
text:
AUBERT,B 2005N  reports [G(B+ --> f_0(1500) K+)/G(total)] * [B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi)] < 6.6E-6 which we divide by our best value B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi) = 34.5E-2.


pdgid: S041T03
text:
AUBERT,B 2005N reports B(B+ --> f_0(1500) K+) . B(f_0(1500) --> pi+ pi-) <4.4E-6. We divide this result by our best value of B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi) =  multiplied by 2/3 to account for the pi+ pi- fraction. Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best value.


pdgid: S041R6
text:
Obtains the result from a Dalitz analysis of B+ --> K0S pi+ pi0 decays. The first error is statistical, the second combines all the systematic uncertainties reported in the paper, including signal modelling.


pdgid: S041R6
text:
AUBERT 2004P also report a branching ratio for B+ --> ''higher  resonances'' pi+, K* --> K+ pi-, 25.1+-2.0+11.0-5.7E-6.


pdgid: S041R6
text:
Uses a reference decay mode B+ --> Dbar0 pi+ and Dbar0 --> K+ pi- with B(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+).B(Dbar0 --> K+ pi-) = 20.3+-2.0E-5.


pdgid: S041R6
text:
ABE 2000C assumes B(Z --> b bbar)=(21.7+-0.1)% and the B fractions f(B0)=f(B+)= (39.7+1.8-2.2)% and f(B_{{s}})=(10.5+1.8-2.2)%.


pdgid: S041B60
text:
Assumes equal production of B0 and B+ at the Upsilon(4S); charm and charmonium contributions are subtracted, otherwise no assumptions about intermediate resonances.


pdgid: S041R32
text:
Calculate the total nonresonant contribution by combining the S-wave composed of K_{{0}}^*(1430) and nonresonant that are described using LASS shape.


pdgid: S041T34
text:
AUBERT 2008AI reports [G(B+ --> omega(782) K+)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-)] = 0.09+-0.13+0.036-0.045E-6 which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-) = 1.53+-0.12E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B59
text:
AUBERT,B 2004P also reports B(B+ --> ''higher f0 resonances'' pi+, f(980)0 --> pi+ pi-) = 3.2+-1.2+6.0-2.9E-6.


pdgid: S041B59
text:
Uses a reference decay mode B+ --> Dbar0 pi+ and Dbar0 --> K+ pi- with B(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+)xB(Dbar0 --> K+ pi-) = 20.3+-2.0E-5. Only charged pions from the f_{{0}}(980) are used.


pdgid: S041T00
text:
AUBERT 2008AI reports [G(B+ --> f_2(1270)0 K+)/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] = 0.75+-0.225+0.225-0.165E-6 which we divide by our best value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3+2.8-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041T00
text:
AUBERT 2008AI reports 0.50+-0.15+0.15-0.11E-6 for B(B+ --> f_2(1270) K+) x B(f_2() --> pi+ pi-). We compute B(B+ --> f_2(1270) K+) using the PDG value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)= and 2/3 for the pi+ pi- fraction. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is  systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041T00
text:
AUBERT,B 2005N reports 8.9E-6 at 90% CL for B(B+ --> f_2(1270) K+) x B(f_2(1270) --> pi+ pi-). We rescaled it using the PDG value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.7% and 2/3 for the pi+ pi- fraction.


pdgid: S041T00
text:
GARMASH 2005 reports 1.3E-6 at 90% CL for B(B+ --> f_2(1270) K+) x B(f_2(1270) --> pi+ pi-). We rescaled it using the PDG value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.7% and 2/3 for the pi+ pi- fraction.


pdgid: S041R72
text:
AUBERT 2008AI reports [G(B+ --> K_2^*(1430)0 pi+)/G(total)] * [B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi)] = 2.775+-0.615+0.915-0.435E-6 which we divide by our best value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = 49.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R72
text:
AUBERT 2008AI reports 1.85+-0.41+0.61-0.29E-6 for B(B+ --> K_2^*(1430)0 pi+) x B(K_2^*(1430)0 --> K+ pi-). We compute B(B+ --> K_2^*(1430)0 pi+) using the PDG value B(K_2^*(1430)0 --> K pi)= and 2/3 for the K+ pi- fraction. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R72
text:
AUBERT,B 2005N reports 7.7E-6 at 90% CL for B(B+ --> K_2^*(1430)0 pi+) x B(K_2^*(1430)0 --> K+ pi-). We rescaled it using the PDG value B(K_2^*(1430)0 --> K pi) = 49.9% and 2/3 for the K+ pi- fraction.


pdgid: S041R72
text:
GARMASH 2005 reports 2.3E-6 at 90% CL for B(B+ --> K_2^*(1430)0 pi+) x B(K_2^*(1430)0 --> K+ pi-). We rescaled it using the PDG value B(K_2^*(1430)0 --> K pi) = 49.9% and 2/3 for the K+ pi- mode.


pdgid: S041Q64
text:
GARMASH 2005 reports 2.0E-6 at 90% CL for B(B+ --> K^*(1410)0 pi+) x B(K^*(1410)0 --> K+ pi-). We rescaled it using the PDG value B(K^*(1410)0 --> K pi) = 6.6% and 2/3 for the K+ pi- mode.


pdgid: S041S09
text:
GARMASH 2005 reports 3.1E-6 at 90% CL for B(B+ --> K^*(1680)0 pi+) x B(K^*(1680)0 --> K+ pi-). We rescaled it using the PDG value B(K^*(1680)0 --> K pi) = 38.7% and 2/3 for the K+ pi- mode.


pdgid: S041S09
text:
AUBERT,B 2005N reports 3.8E-6 at 90% CL for B(B+ --> K^*(1680)0 pi+) x B(K^*(1680)0 --> K+ pi-). We rescaled it using the PDG value B(K^*(1680)0 --> K pi) = 38.7% and 2/3 for the K+ pi- fraction.


pdgid: S041B82
text:
Obtains the result from a Dalitz analysis of B+ --> K0S pi+ pi0 decays. The first error is  statistical, the second combines all the systematic uncertainties reported in the paper, including  signal modelling.


pdgid: S041P48
text:
Obtains the result from a Dalitz analysis of B+ --> K0S pi+ pi0 decays. The first error is statistical, the second combines all the systematic uncertainties reported in  the paper, including signal modelling.


pdgid: S041R73
text:
Assumes a helicity 00 configuration.  For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 4.9E-5.


pdgid: S041B62
text:
Charm and charmonium contributions are subtracted, otherwise no assumptions about intermediate resonances.


pdgid: S041B4
text:
AAIJ 2019AL reports 0.323+-0.015+-0.041 fit fraction for B+ --> K+ K- pi+ nonresonant  from the amplitude analysis of B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays. We use the PDG 2019 value  B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.2+-0.4E-6 to obtain B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+ nonresonant). Our  first error is the experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best  value.


pdgid: S041B38
text:
AAIJ 2019AL reports 7.5+-0.6+-0.5E-2 fit fraction for B+ --> K+ Kbar^*(892)0 from  the amplitude analysis of B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays. We use the PDG 2019 value B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) =  5.2+-0.4E-6 to obtain B(B+ --> K+ Kbar^*(892)0 , Kbar^*(892)0 --> K+ pi-). We compute  B(B+ --> K+ Kbar^*(892)0) using 2/3 of B(Kbar^*(892)0 --> ( K pi )^0 ) =  (99.754+-0.021)% for the K+ pi- fraction. Our first error is the experiment's error  and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C04
text:
AAIJ 2019AL reports 4.5+-0.7+-1.2E-2 for fit fraction for B+ --> K+ Kbar_0^*(1430)0 from the  amplitude analysis of B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays. We use the PDG 2019 value B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.2+-0.4E-6 to  obtain B(B+ --> K+ Kbar_0^*(1430)0 , Kbar_0^*(1430)0 --> K+ pi-). We compute B(B+ --> K+ Kbar_0^*(1430)0)  using 2/3 of PDG 2019 value B(K_0^*(1430)0 --> K pi) = (93+-10)% for the  K+ pi- fraction. Our first error is the experiment's error and the second error is systematic  error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041P74
text:
AAIJ 2019AL reports 0.307+-0.012+-0.009 fit fraction for B+ --> rho(1450) pi+ from  the amplitude analysis of B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays. We use the PDG 2019 value B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) =  5.2+-0.4E-6 to obtain B(B+ --> rho(1450) pi+ , rho(1450) --> K+ K-). Our first error is  the experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041P76
text:
AAIJ 2019AL reports 0.164+-0.008+-0.01 fit fraction for B+ --> pi+ ( K+ K- )_S-wave in  the region of 0.95 < m(K+ K-) < 1.42 GeV/c**2 from the amplitude analysis of  B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays. We use the PDG 2019 value B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.2+-0.4E-6  to obtain B(B+ --> pi+ ( K+ K- )_S-wave). Our first error is the experiment's  error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041A81
text:
Investigated the angular distribution of K+ K- pairs with invariant mass below 1.1  GeV/c**2,  which exhibits both a strong enhancement in signal and very large direct CP  violation.


pdgid: S041Q67
text:
GARMASH 2005 reports B(B+ --> f_2^'(1525) K+) . B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) < 4.9E-6 at 90% CL. We divide this result by our best value of B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) =  multiplied by 2/3 to account for the K+ K- fraction.


pdgid: S041Q67
text:
GARMASH 2005   reports [G(B+ --> f_2^'(1525) K+)/G(total)] * [B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar)] < 7.35E-6 which we divide by our best value B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8E-2.


pdgid: S041C9
text:
No evidence is found for such decay and set a limit on B(B+ --> f_J(2220))xB(f_J(2220) --> phi phi) <1.2E-6 at 90%CL where the f_{{J}}(2220) is a possible glueball state.


pdgid: S041B55
text:
Signal significance is 2.7 standard deviations. This measurement corresponds to an upper limit of  < 1.31E-6 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S041B55
text:
Assumes a helicity 00 configuration.  For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 4.8E-5.


pdgid: S041D06
text:
The second uncertainty includes systematic and reference branching reaction of B+ --> eta_c K+  uncertainties.


pdgid: S041C8
text:
Assumes equal production of B0 and B+ at the Upsilon(4S) and the phi phi invariant mass below 2.85 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S041B42
text:
No evidence for a nonresonant K pi gamma contamination was seen; the central value assumes no contamination.


pdgid: S041R35
text:
AAIJ 2019AL reports 0.075+-0.008+-0.007 fit fraction for B+ --> f_2(1270) pi+ from  the amplitude analysis of B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays. We use the PDG 2019 value B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) =  5.2+-0.4E-6 to obtain B(B+ --> f_2(1270) pi+ , f_2(1270) --> K+ K-). We compute  B(B+ --> f_2(1270) pi+) using 1/2 of PDG 2019 value of B(f_2(1270) --> K Kbar) =  (4.6+0.5-0.4)% for K+ K- fraction. Our first error is the experiment's error and the  second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R35
text:
AUBERT 2009L  reports [G(B+ --> pi+ f_2(1270))/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi+ pi-)] = 0.9+-0.2+-0.1+0.3-0.1E-6 which we divide by our best value B(f_2(1270) --> pi+ pi-) = 56.2+1.9-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R35
text:
AUBERT,B 2005G  reports [G(B+ --> pi+ f_2(1270))/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi+ pi-)] = 2.3+-0.6+-0.4E-6 which we divide by our best value B(f_2(1270) --> pi+ pi-) = 56.2+1.9-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R41
text:
The second uncertainty includes both systematics (+-0.09E-5) and possible interference with   B+ --> rho(1450)+ pi0   (+0.08).


pdgid: S041B28
text:
AAIJ 2019AL reports 0.3+-0.1+-0.1E-2 fit fraction for B+ --> phi(1020) pi+ from  the amplitude analysis of B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays. We use the PDG 2019 value B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) =  5.2+-0.4E-6 to obtain B(B+ --> phi(1020) pi+ , phi(1020) --> K+ K-). We compute  B(B+ --> phi(1020) pi+) using the PDG 2019 value of B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) =  (49.2+-0.5)%. Our first error is the experiment's error and the second error is  systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B28
text:
Measures B(B+ --> phi pi+ )/B(B+ --> phi K+ )< 0.018 at 90% C.L. and assumes B(B+ --> phi K+ ) = 8.8+0.7-0.6E-6.


pdgid: S041B56
text:
AMMAR 2001B searched for the two-body decay of the Bmeson to a massless neutral feebly-interacting particle X0 such as the familon, the Nambu-Goldstone boson associated with a spontaneously broken global family symmetry.


pdgid: S041P46
text:
AAIJ 2017AQ searched for a long-lived scalar particle X0 --> mu+ mu- in the mass range  250 -- 4700 MeV and lifetime range 0.1 -- 1000 ps. The limit is between E-7 and  2E-10 in these ranges except in vetoed mass regions around K(S)0, J/psi, psi(2S),  and psi(3770).


pdgid: S041P84
text:
Assumes equal production of B0 and B+ from Upsilon(4S) decays.  This measurement is quoted for M(pi+ pi0) < 1.3 GeV.


pdgid: S041BA1
text:
AAIJ 2013S  reports [G(B+ --> p pbar K+)/G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 4.91+-0.19+-0.14 which we multiply by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041Q46
text:
Uses B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.016+-0.033E-3, B(J/psi --> p pbar) = 2.17+-0.07E-3 and B(Lambda(1520) --> K- p) = 0.234+-0.016.


pdgid: S041Q07
text:
Explicitly vetoes resonant production of p pbar from charmonium states. The branching fraction for M(p pbar) < 2.85 GeV/c**2 is also reported.


pdgid: S041R23
text:
Statistical significance of the signal is 4.1 standard deviations where the the normalisation is  based on B(B+ --> KS pi+) = 11.895+-0.375E-06.


pdgid: S041Q11
text:
Excluding charmonium events in 2.85< mass(Lambda Lambdabar)< 3.128 GeV/c**2  and  3.315< mass(Lambda Lambdabar)< 3.735 GeV/c**2. Measurements in various mass(Lambda Lambdabar) bins are also reported.


pdgid: S041T72
text:
Uses B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 63.9+-0.5%, B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.89+-0.05%, and B(D0 --> K- pi+ pi0) = 13.9+-0.5%.


pdgid: S041T73
text:
CHEN 2011F  reports <4.8E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> p Lambdabar0 Dbar^*(2007)0)/G(total)] / [B(D^*(2007)0 --> D0 pi0)] assuming B(D^*(2007)0 --> D0 pi0) = 61.9+-2.9E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2007)0 --> D0 pi0) = 64.7E-2.


pdgid: S041B14
text:
AUBERT 2008BN reports 3.4+-0.1+-0.9E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B14
text:
GABYSHEV 2006A  reports 2.01+-0.15+-0.20E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B14
text:
DYTMAN 2002   reports 2.4+0.63-0.62E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B14
text:
GABYSHEV 2002   reports 1.87+0.51-0.49E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R07
text:
GABYSHEV 2006A  reports 5.9+-1.0+-0.6E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- Delta_X(1600)++)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R08
text:
GABYSHEV 2006A  reports 4.7+1.0-0.9+-0.4E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- Delta_X(2420)++)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R09
text:
GABYSHEV 2006A  reports 3.9+0.8-0.7+-0.4E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> ( Lambdabar_c()- p )_s pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C50
text:
AUBERT 2008BN reports [G(B+ --> Sigmabar_c(2800)0 p)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+)] = 0.117+-0.023+-0.024 which we multiply by our best value B(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+) = 2.2+-0.4E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B11
text:
DYTMAN 2002 measurement uses B(Lambda_c- --> pbar K+ pi-) = 5.0+-1.3%. The second error includes the systematic and the uncertainty of the branching ratio.


pdgid: S041R02
text:
AUBERT 2008H  reports 1.14+-0.15+-0.62E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambda_c()+ Lambda_c()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R02
text:
GABYSHEV 2006   reports 7.9+1.0-0.9+-3.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambda_c()+ Lambda_c()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041A71
text:
The second uncertainty includes both systematic (+-0.22) and the charm decay branching fraction   (+-0.25).


pdgid: S041P53
text:
The Xi_{{c}}(2930) is found in its decay to K- Lambda_c()+ in B- --> K- Lambda_c()- Lambda_c()+ with  a significance more than 5 sigma.


pdgid: S041B88
text:
GABYSHEV 2006A  reports 3.7+-0.7+-0.4E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Sigmabar_c(2455)0 p)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B79
text:
DYTMAN 2002   reports 4.4+-1.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Sigmabar_c(2455)0 p pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B76
text:
DYTMAN 2002   reports 4.4+-1.3E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Sigmabar_c(2455)0 p pi- pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B77
text:
LEES 2012Z  reports 2.98+-0.16+-0.15+-0.77E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Sigmabar_c(2455)-- p pi+ pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B77
text:
DYTMAN 2002   reports 2.8+-0.9+-0.5+-0.7E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Sigmabar_c(2455)-- p pi+ pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R04
text:
AUBERT 2008H  reports 2.51+-0.89+-0.61E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Xibar_c()0 Lambda_c()+  ,  Xibar_c()0 --> Xibar+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R04
text:
CHISTOV 2006A  reports 5.6+1.9-1.5+-1.9E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Xibar_c()0 Lambda_c()+  ,  Xibar_c()0 --> Xibar+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R05
text:
AUBERT 2008H  reports 1.70+-0.93+-0.53E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Xibar_c()0 Lambda_c()+  ,  Xibar_c()0 --> Lambda K+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R05
text:
CHISTOV 2006A  reports 4.0+1.1-0.9+-1.3E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Xibar_c()0 Lambda_c()+  ,  Xibar_c()0 --> Lambda K+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041D21
text:
LEES 2023C searched for psi_{{DS}}, where psi_{{DS}} is a dark sector antibaryon, in the  recoil mass against p and the fully reconstructed accompanying B meson. The cited upper  limit is for mass(psi_{{DS}}) between 1 and 4.3 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S041R55
text:
AAIJ 2015AR reports 1.83+-0.24+-0.05E-8 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> pi+ mu+ mu-)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] assuming B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.05+-0.05E-3,B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2, which we rescale to our best values B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S041R11
text:
Assumes equal production of B0 and B+ at Upsilon(4S). The second error is a total of systematic uncertainties including model dependence.


pdgid: S041P41
text:
Measured in amplitude analysis using model including short-distance K+ mu+ mu- and  rho(770), omega(782), phi(1020), J/psi, psi(2S), psi(3770), psi(4040),  psi(4160), and psi(4415) contributions.


pdgid: S041P28
text:
Uses only leptonic decays of tau and the quoted limit combines the final states K+ e+ e-,  K+ mu+ mu-, and K+ e+- mu-+.


pdgid: S041P28
text:
If observed events are interpreted as a signal the branching fraction measurement becomes 1.31+0.66-0.61+0.35-0.25E-3.


pdgid: S041B51
text:
Taking an average value from two methods, using (1) a hadronic tagging of the other B meson in  the event, and (2) an inclusive tagging method that exploits the inclusive properties of the other  B meson in the event.


pdgid: S041B51
text:
Using an inclusive tagging method that exploits not only the properties of the B+ --> K+ nu nubar decay,  but also the inclusive properties of the other B meson in the event.


pdgid: S041R82
text:
Assumes equal production of B0 and B+ at Upsilon(4S). The second error is a total of systematic uncertainties including model dependence. The 90% C.L. upper limit is 2.2E-6.


pdgid: S041T29
text:
Also reported a limit <11.6E-5 at 90% CL obtained using a fully reconstructed hadronic B-tag evnets.


pdgid: S041P75
text:
Signal candidates are identified by first fully reconstructing B+ in one of many possible  exclusive decays to hadronic final states.


pdgid: S041R60
text:
Uses B+ --> J/psi K+ , J/psi --> mu+ mu- mode for normalization. Obtains neutrino-mass-dependent upper limits in the range 0.4 -- 4.0E-9. This limit is applicable for Majorana neutrino lifetime < 1 ps.


pdgid: S041R60
text:
Uses B+ --> J/psi K+ , J/psi --> mu+ mu- mode for normalization. Obtains neutrino-mass-dependent upper limits in the range 0.4 -- 1.0E-8.


pdgid: S041BL5
text:
Uses B+ --> psi(2S) K+ , psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi- mode for normalization. Obtains neutrino-mass-dependent upper limits in the range 1.5 -- 8.0E-7.


pdgid: S041BL6
text:
Uses B+ --> psi(2S) K+ , psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi- mode for normalization. Obtains neutrino-mass-dependent upper limits in the range 0.3 -- 1.5E-6.


pdgid: S041T66
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011K  reports <6.1E-8 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambda0 mu+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda --> p pi-)] assuming B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 63.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 64.1E-2.


pdgid: S041T67
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011K  reports <3.2E-8 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambda0 e+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda --> p pi-)] assuming B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 63.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 64.1E-2.


pdgid: S041T68
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011K  reports <6.2E-8 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar0 mu+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda --> p pi-)] assuming B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 63.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 64.1E-2.


pdgid: S041T69
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011K  reports <8.1E-8 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar0 e+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda --> p pi-)] assuming B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 63.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 64.1E-2.


pdgid: S041D26
text:
The signals are reconstructed in decay chains: Xi_c()0 --> Xi- pi+ , Lambda0 K- pi+ , p K- K- pi+, and  Lambda_c()- --> pbar K0S , pbar K+ pi-.


pdgid: S041A39
text:
SIRUNYAN 2021AC measurement is performed in 1.0 < q**2 < 8.68 GeV**2/c**4. Reports also measurements in several other q**2 intervals.


pdgid: S041A49
text:
The full set of CP-averaged angular observables is measured as a function of the q**2.  The   measured Gamma(L) is related to the polarisation of the K^*(892)+.


pdgid: S041A40
text:
SIRUNYAN 2021AC measurement is performed in 10.09 < q**2 < 12.86 GeV**2/c**4. Reports also measurements in several other q**2 intervals.


pdgid: S041A41
text:
SIRUNYAN 2021AC measurement is performed in 14.18 < q**2 < 19.0 GeV**2/c**4. Reports also measurements in several other q**2 intervals.


pdgid: S041A50
text:
The full set of CP-averaged angular observables is measured as a function of the q**2. The   measured Gamma(L) is related to the polarisation of the K^*(892)+.


pdgid: S041AX1
text:
A +0.3% correction is applied due to a slightly higher reconstruction efficiency for the positive kaons.


pdgid: S041AC2
text:
Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of D0 --> pi+ pi- pi0. Also reports the one-sigma regions: 0.06 < r(B)< 0.78,  -30degree<gamma< 76degree, and -27degree<delta< 78degree.


pdgid: S041AY3
text:
Reports the first evidence for direct CP violation in B --> D K decays with 3.6 standard deviations.


pdgid: S041AY3
text:
AAIJ 2012M reports an evidence of direct CP violation in B+- --> D K+- decays with a total significance of 5.8 sigma.


pdgid: S041AA1
text:
The statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations  between the R(K)**- and R(K)**+ observables.


pdgid: S041AA2
text:
The statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations  between the R(pi)**- and R(pi)**+ observables.


pdgid: S041AD+
text:
Measures the asymmetry separately for K+ K- and pi+ pi- final states, A(K K) = 0.06+-0.07+-0.01and  A(pi pi) = 0.15+-0.13+-0.01, and combines the two results. The value of A(pi pi) was  updated in AAIJ 2018X.


pdgid: S041AY6
text:
The second error includes both systematics and the uncertainties from CP asymmetries in  restricted regions of phase space.


pdgid: S041CKK
text:
AAIJ 2014 reports A(CP)(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) = -0.648+-0.070+-0.013+-0.007 in the Dalitz plot region of mass**2(K+ K-) < 1.5 GeV**2/c**4. The third uncertainty is due to the CP asymmetry of the B+- --> J/psi K+- reference mode uncertainty.


pdgid: S041A82
text:
Investigated the angular distribution of K+ K- pairs with invariant mass below 1.1  GeV/c**2,   which exhibits both a strong enhancement in signal and very large direct CP  violation.


pdgid: S041A17
text:
Uses amplitude analysis of B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays in the pi pi - K K  rescattering mass region of 0.95 < m(K+ K-) < 1.42 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S041AY5
text:
AAIJ 2014 reports A(CP)(B+ --> pi+ pi- pi+) = 0.584+-0.082+-0.027+-0.007 in the Dalitz plot region of mass**2(pi+ pi-) > 15 GeV**2/c**4 or mass**2(pi+ pi-)< 0.4 GeV**2/c**4. The third uncertainty is due to the CP asymmetry of the B+- --> J/psi K+- reference mode uncertainty.


pdgid: S041CP4
text:
This result is obtained with an amplitude analysis of B+ --> pi+ pi+ pi- decays, using the isobar  model within the mass range 1.0 < m(pi+ pi-) < 1.5 GeV to describe the pi+ pi-  S-wave contribution.


pdgid: S041CR1
text:
Measured in the union of 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4. LEES 2012S reports also individual measurements A(CP)(B+ --> K+ lepton+ lepton-) = 0.02+-0.18+-0.01 for 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and A(CP)(B+ --> K+ lepton+ lepton-) = -0.06+0.22-0.21+-0.01 for q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses combined sample of Belle and Belle II experiments in B+ decays to D K+, D^* K+,  and D pi+ final states.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Extracted from yields of partially reconstructed B+- --> D^* K+-, D^* --> D pi0 / gamma , D --> K0S pi+ pi- / K0S K+ K-  decays. The uncertainty is predominantly statistical. Its correlation with the AAIJ 2023BA  result is found to be less than 3%.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
A model-independent binned Dalitz plot analysis of the decays B0 --> D K^*()0, with D --> K0S h+ h-,  h = pi, K. Angle gamma is required to satisfy 0 < gamma <  180 degrees.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Measured using B+- --> D^* K+- and B+- --> D^* pi+- decays analysing the signal yield  variation with the fully reconstructed D^* --> D pi0 / gamma , D --> K0S pi+ pi- / K0S K+ K-  decays. The model-independent approach uses external strong phase input from BESIII and CLEO  collaborations.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Measured using B+- --> D [ K-+ pi+- pi+- pi-+ ] h+- decays in bins of the phase  space of the D decay. The third uncertainty includes systematic and finite knowledge of the  D-meson decay parameters.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- and K0S K+ K- from B+- --> D K+-   modes. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c and BES-III of the D decay over the Dalitz plot   are used as input. Value is modulo 180degree.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
AAIJ 2021AM presents a combination of existing measurements from LHCb collaboration. It  includes also charm mixing  parameters.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Measured in B_s()0 --> D_s()+- K-+ pi+- pi-+ decays in restricted phase space with m(K+ pi+ pi-)  < 1950 MeV, m(K+ pi-) < 1200 MeV and m(pi+ pi-) < 1200 MeV.  The value is modulo 180degree.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
A model-independent coherence factor for the decay B_s --> D_s K pi pi (in the restricted phase   space region) is also reported.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses binned analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- pi0  from B+- --> D K+- modes over the phase  space. Strong phase measurements from RESMI 2018 analysis of CLEO-c data of the D decay  over the phase space binning are used as input.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- and K0S K+ K- from B+- --> D K+-  modes. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c of the D decay over the Dalitz plot are used as  input.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Measured in B_s()0 --> D_s()-+ K+- decays, constraining -2beta_{{s}} by the measurement of  phi_{{s}} = 0.030+-0.033 from HFLAV. The value is modulo 180degree.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
AAIJ 2018Z reports the intervals (5 -- 86)degree or (185 -- 266)degree at  68% C.L. The extraction uses the time dependent CP violation measurement in B0 --> D-+ pi+- decays  with external input and some theoretical assumptions.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- decays coming from B0 --> D K^*(892)0 modes. Measures r(B0) = 0.39+-0.13, and delta(B0) = 197+24-20  degrees.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
A combination of measurements from analyses of time-integrated B+ --> D K+, B0 --> D K^(*)()0, B0 --> D K+ pi-, and  B+ --> D K+ pi+ pi- tree-level decays. In addition, results from a time-dependent analysis of  B_s()0 --> D_s K decays are included.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
A model-independent binned Dalitz plot analysis of the decays B0 --> D K^*()0, with D --> K0S pi+ pi-  and D --> K0S K+ K-. The results cannot be combined with the model-dependent analysis of the  same dataset reported in AAIJ 2016AA.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- , K0S K+ K- decays coming from B0 --> D K^*(892)0  modes.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Obtained by measuring time-dependent CP asymmetry in B_s()0 --> K+ K- and using a U-spin  relation between B_s()0 --> K+ K- and B0 --> pi+ pi-.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Results are also presented using additional inputs on B0 --> pi0 pi0 and B+ --> pi+ pi0 decays from other experiments and isospin symmetry assumptions. The dependence of the results on the maximum allowed amount of U-spin breaking up to 50% is also included.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of B+ --> D K+ decays, with D --> K0S pi+ pi- and D --> K0S K+ K-. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c (LIBBY 2010) of the D decay over the Dalitz plot are used as input. Solution that satisfies 0 <gamma< 180 is chosen.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
AAIJ 14BE uses model-dependent analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- amplitudes. The model is the same as in DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010F.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Measured in B_s()0 --> D_s()-+ K+- decays, constraining -2beta_{{s}} by the measurement of phi_{{s}} = 0.01+-0.07+-0.0 from AAIJ 2013AR. The value is modulo 180degree at 68% CL.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Reports combination of published measurements using GGSZ, GLW, and ADS methods. Reports also 2sigma range of 41 -- 102degrees and a 5.9sigma significance for gamma(B+ --> D^(*)()0 K^(*)()+) not= 0 hypothesis.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot of Dbar0 --> K0S pi+ pi- decays from B+ --> Dbar0 K+.  Measurement of strong phases in Dbar0 --> K0S pi+ pi- Dalitz plot from LIBBY 2010 is used as input.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
We combined the systematics in quadrature. The authors report separately the contribution to the systematic uncertainty   due to the uncertainty on the bin-averaged strong phase difference between D0 and Dbar0   amplitudes. Superseded by ABUDINEN 2022.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi-, K0S K+ K- decays from B+ --> D^(*)() K+, D K^*()+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval for gamma is 39degree<gamma< 98degree. CP conservation in the combined result is ruled out with a significance of 3.5 standard deviations.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Reports confidence intervals for the CKM angle gamma from the measured values of the GLW parameters using B()+- --> D K()+- decays with D mesons decaying to non-CP(K pi),  CP-even (K+ K-, pi+ pi-), and CP-odd (K0S pi0, K0S omega) states.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- decays from B+ --> D^(*)() K+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval for gamma is 54.2degree<gamma< 100.5degree. CP conservation in the combined result is ruled out with a significance of 3.5 standard deviations.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of D0 --> K0S pi+ pi- decays coming from B0 --> D0 K^*()0 modes. The corresponding 95% CL interval is 77degrees<gamma< 247degrees.  A 180 degree ambiguity is implied.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- and Dbar^0() --> K0S K+ K- decays coming from B()+- --> D^(*)() K^(*)()+- modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 29degree<gamma< 122degree.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of the Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- decays; Combines the D K+, D^* K+ and D K^*+() modes. The corresponding two standard deviations interval for gamma is 8degree<gamma< 111degree.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of neutral D --> K0S pi+ pi- decays coming from B+- --> D K+- and B+- --> D^*()0 K+- followed by D^*()0 --> D pi0, D gamma. The corresponding two standard deviations interval for gamma is 12degree < gamma < 137degree. AUBERT,B 2005Y also reports the amplitude ratios and the strong phases.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of the 3-body D --> KS pi+ pi- decays coming from B+- --> D K+- and B+- --> D^* K+- followed by D^* --> D pi0; here we use D to denote that the neutral D meson produced in the decay is an admixture of D0 and Dbar0. The corresponding two standard deviations interval for gamma is 26**degrees <gamma< 126**degrees. POLUEKTOV 2004 also reports the amplitude ratios and the strong phases.


pdgid: S041ARX
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of B+ --> D K+ decays, with D --> K0S pi+ pi- and D --> K0S K+ K-.   Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c (LIBBY 2010) of the D decay over the Dalitz plot   are used as input. Supersedes AIHARA 2012.


pdgid: S041ARX
text:
Uses binned analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- pi0 from B+- --> D K+- modes over the phase   space. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c and BES-III data of the D decay over the phase  space binning are used as input.


pdgid: S041ARX
text:
Uses binned analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- pi0 from B+- --> D K+- modes over the phase  space. Strong phase measurements from RESMI 2018 analysis of CLEO-c data of the D decay  over the phase space binning are used as input.


pdgid: S041ARX
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi-, K0S K+ K- decays from B+ --> D^(*)() K^(*)()+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 0.037 <r_{{B}}<0.155.


pdgid: S041ARX
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- decays from B+ --> D^0() K+ modes.  The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 0.084 <r_{{B}}< 0.239.


pdgid: S041ARX
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- and Dbar^0() --> K0S K+ K- decays coming from B()+- --> D^(*)() K^(*)()+- modes.


pdgid: S041ARX
text:
Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of the Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- decays; Combines the D K+, D^* K+ and D K^*+() modes.


pdgid: S041ARX
text:
Uses a Dalitz analysis of neutral D decays to K0S pi+ pi- in the processes B+- --> D^(*)() K+-, D^*() --> D pi0, D gamma.


pdgid: S041DRX
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of B+ --> D K+ decays, with D --> K0S pi+ pi- and D --> K0S K+ K-.  Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c (LIBBY 2010) of the  D decay over the Dalitz plot  are used as input.


pdgid: S041DRX
text:
AAIJ 2014BE uses model-dependent analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- amplitudes. The model is  the same as in DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010F.


pdgid: S041DRX
text:
We combined the systematics in quadrature. The authors report separately the contribution to the systematic uncertainty  due to the uncertainty on the bin-averaged strong phase difference between D0 and Dbar0  amplitudes. Superseded by ABUDINEN 2022.


pdgid: S041DRX
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi-, K0S K+ K- decays from B+ --> D^(*)() K^(*)()+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 75degree<delta_{{B}}<157degree.


pdgid: S041DRX
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- decays from B+ --> Dbar^0() K+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 102.2degree<delta_{{B}}< 162.3degree.


pdgid: S041A32
text:
Measured using B+- --> D [ K-+ pi+- pi+- pi-+ ] h+- decays in bins of the   phase  space  of the D decay. The third uncertainty includes systematic and finite knowledge of   the  D-meson decay parameters.


pdgid: S041A32
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- and K0S K+ K- from B+- --> D pi+-   modes. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c and BES-III of the D decay over the Dalitz plot  are used as input.


pdgid: S041A33
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- and K0S K+ K- from B+- --> D pi+-   modes. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c and BES-III of the D decay over the Dalitz plot   are used as input. Value is modulo 180degree.


pdgid: S041ARY
text:
Extracted from yields of partially reconstructed B+- --> D^* K+-, D^* --> D pi0 / gamma , D --> K0S pi+ pi- / K0S K+ K- decays. The uncertainty is predominantly statistical. Its correlation with the AAIJ 2023BA  result is found to be less than 3%.


pdgid: S041ARY
text:
Measured using B+- --> D^* K+- decays analysing the signal yield variation with the fully  reconstructed D^* --> D pi0 / gamma , D --> K0S pi+ pi- / K0S K+ K- decays. The model-independent approach uses external strong phase input from BESIII and CLEO collaborations.


pdgid: S041ARY
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi-, K0S K+ K- decays from B+ --> D^(*)() K^(*)()+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 0.049 <r^*_B()<0.215.


pdgid: S041ARY
text:
Uses the Cabibbo suppressed decay of B+ --> Dbar^*() K+ followed by Dbar^*() --> Dbar pi0 or Dbar gamma, and Dbar --> K- pi+.


pdgid: S041ARY
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- decays from B+ --> D^*()0 K+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 0.061 <r^*_B()< 0.271.


pdgid: S041DRY
text:
Measured using B+- --> D^* K+- decays analysing the signal yield variation with the fully  reconstructed D^* --> D pi0 / gamma , D --> K0S pi+ pi- / K0S K+ K- decays. The  model-independent approach uses external strong phase input from BESIII and CLEO collaborations.


pdgid: S041DRY
text:
Reports combination of published measurements using GGSZ, GLW, and ADS methods. We added 360degrees to the value of (-66+21-31)degrees quoted by LEES 2013B.


pdgid: S041DRY
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi-, K0S K+ K- decays from B+ --> D^(*)() K^(*)()+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 236degree<delta_{{B}}^*()<322degree.


pdgid: S041DRY
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- decays from B+ --> D^* K+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 296.5degree<delta_{{B}}^*()< 382.7degree.


pdgid: S041D18
text:
Measured using B+- --> D^* pi+- decays analysing the signal yield variation with the fully  reconstructed D^* --> D pi0 / gamma , D --> K0S pi+ pi- / K0S K+ K- decays. The  model-independent approach uses external strong phase input from BESIII and CLEO collaborations.


pdgid: S041PBO
text:
Uses B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)+) = 1.431+-0.027+-0.090E-3 for normalization and mu+ mu- as a lepton pair.


pdgid: S041PB7
text:
Uses B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)+) = 1.431+-0.027+-0.090E-3 for normalization and mu+ mu- as a lepton pair. Measured in 1.1 < q**2 < 6.0 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S041A54
text:
The reported value is converted from the measured dB/dq^2 = 9.2+1.9-1.8+0.8-0.6E-8   (GeV**2/c**4)**-1 by multiplying by the Deltaq^2 = 5.955   GeV**2/c**4  range.


pdgid: S041PBN
text:
Uses B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 0.998+-0.014+-0.040E-3 for normalization and mu+ mu- as a lepton pair.


pdgid: S041PBF
text:
Measured by taking the ratio of the branching fraction from B+ --> K+ e+ e- and B+ --> J/psi ( e+ e- ) K+  decays and multiplying it by the measured value of B+ --> J/psi K+ and J/psi --> e+ e- as  in PDG 2018. The branching fraction of B+ --> K+ e+ e- is determined in the region 1.1  < q**2 < 6 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S041PBF
text:
Uses B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 0.998+-0.014+-0.040E-3 for normalization and mu+ mu- for leptons. Measured for 1.1 < q**2< 6.0 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S041PBF
text:
Measured by taking the ratio of the branching fraction from B+ --> K+ e+ e- and B+ --> J/psi ( e+ e- ) K+decays  and multiplying it by the measured value of B+ -->J/psi K+ and J/psi --> e+ e- as in  PDG 2012.The branching fraction of B+ --> K+ e+ e- is determined in the region 1 <  q**2 < 6 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S041PBP
text:
The ratio is determined using the relative branching fractions of the decays B+ --> K+ lepton+ lepton-  and B+ --> J/psi(lepton+ lepton-) K+, with lepton = e, mu. Measured for  the region 1.1 < q**2 < 6.0 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S041PBJ
text:
Measurement is performed in 1.0 < q**2 < 6.0 GeV**2/c**4. SIRUNYAN 2018DX  reports also measurements in several other q**2 intervals.


pdgid: S041PBJ
text:
AAIJ 2014O reports 68% C.L. interval, which we encode as midpoint with uncertainty as half of the width of interval.


pdgid: S041A51
text:
The full set of CP-averaged angular observables is measured as a function of the q**2. The  A(FB) is measured related to the dimuon system.


pdgid: S041A03
text:
AAIJ 2017AP uses B+ --> Dbar0 pi+ decays with B+ transverse momenta pT and  rapidities y in the region of 2 < pT < 30 GeV/c and 2.1 < y < 4.5.


pdgid: S041A03
text:
AAIJ 2017BF uses B+ --> J/psi K+ decays with B+ transverse momenta pT and  rapidities y in the region of 0 < pT < 30 GeV/c and 2.1 < y < 4.5.


pdgid: S042M
text:
CSORNA 2000 uses fully reconstructed 135 B0 --> J/psi^(') K0S events and invariant masses without beam constraint.


pdgid: S042M
text:
Found using fully reconstructed decays with J/psi.  ALBRECHT 1987D assume mass(Upsilon(4S)) = 10577 MeV.


pdgid: S042DM
text:
BEBEK 1987 actually measure the difference between half of Ecm and the B+- or B0 mass, so the mass(B0)-mass(B+-) is more accurate. Assume mass(Upsilon(4S)) = 10580 MeV.


pdgid: S042T
text:
Measured using a simultaneous fit of the B0 lifetime and Bbar0 B0 oscillation frequency Deltamass(d) in the partially reconstructed B0 --> D^*()- lepton nu decays.


pdgid: S042T
text:
AUBERT 2003C uses a sample of approximately 14,000 exclusively reconstructed B0 --> D^*(2010)- lepton nu and simultaneously measures the lifetime and oscillation frequency.


pdgid: S042T
text:
Measurement performed with decays B0 --> D^*()- pi+ and B0 --> D^*()- rho+ using a partial reconstruction technique.


pdgid: S042T
text:
Combined result of D/D^* lepton x analysis, fully reconstructed B analysis, and partially reconstructed D^*()- pi+ X analysis.


pdgid: S042T
text:
WAGNER 1990 tagged B0 mesons by their decays into D^*()- e+ nu and D^*()- mu+ nu where the D^*()- is tagged by its decay into pi- Dbar0.


pdgid: S042DT2
text:
ARTUSO 1997 uses partial reconstruction of B --> D^* lepton nu_lepton and independent of B0 and B+ production fraction.


pdgid: S042DT2
text:
ATHANAS 1994 uses events tagged by fully reconstructed B- decays and partially or fully reconstructed B0 decays.


pdgid: S042DGS
text:
Measured using B0 --> J/psi K^*(892)0 and B0 --> J/psi K0S decays, and assuming  beta = 21.9+-0.7 degrees.


pdgid: S042DGS
text:
Measured from the ratio of decay time distributions of B0 --> J/psi K0S and B0 --> J/psi K^*()0  decays.


pdgid: S042DGS
text:
Reports -DeltaGamma_{{d}}/Gamma_{{d}} using B0 --> J/psi K0S, J/psi K0L, D- pi+, D^*()- pi+, D^*()- rho+, and D^*()- lepton+ nu decays.


pdgid: S042DGS
text:
BEHRENS 2000B uses high-momentum lepton tags and partially reconstructed Bbar0 --> D^*()+ pi-, rho- decays to determine the flavor of the Bmeson. Assumes Delta(md)=0.478+-0.018ps**-1 and tau(B0)=1.548+-0.032ps.


pdgid: S042R94
text:
URQUIJO 2007 report a measurement of (9.80+-0.29+-0.21)% for the partial branching fraction of B --> e nu_e X_c decay with electron energy above 0.6 GeV. We converted the result to B --> e nu_e X branching fraction.


pdgid: S042P68
text:
The correlation of 50% with B(B+ --> lepton+ nu_lepton X_u)(letpon energy in B rest  frame E(lepton)*** > 1 GeV) was reported.


pdgid: S042R35
text:
Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side while the other, on the signal side, is partially reconstructed from B --> D lepton nu.


pdgid: S042R35
text:
BUSKULIC 1997 assumes fraction (B+) = fraction (B0) = (37.8+-2.2)% and PDG 1996 values for Blifetime and branching ratio of D^* and D decays.


pdgid: S042R35
text:
FULTON 1991 assumes assuming  equal production of B0 and B+ at the Upsilon(4S)  and uses MarkIII D and D^* branching ratios.


pdgid: S042R35
text:
ALBRECHT 1989J reports 0.018+-0.006+-0.005. We rescale using the method described in STONE 1994 but with the updated PDG 1994 B(D0 --> K- pi+).


pdgid: S042R21
text:
Measured using fully reconstructed D^*() sample and a simultaneous fit to the Caprini-Lellouch-Neubert  form factor parameters: rho**2 = 1.191+-0.048+-0.028,  R(1)(1) = 1.429+-0.061+-0.044, and R(2)(1) = 0.827+-0.038+-0.022.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
ABBIENDI 2000Q assumes the fraction B(b --> B0)= (39.7+1.8-2.2)%.  This result is an average of two methods using exclusive and partial D^* reconstruction.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
BUSKULIC 1997 assumes fraction (B+) = fraction (B0) = (37.8+-2.2)% and PDG 1996 values for Blifetime and D^* and D branching fractions.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1997G assumes fraction (B+) = fraction (B0) = (37.8+-2.2)% and PDG 1996 values for Blifetime and branching ratio of D^* and D decays.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
BARISH 1995 use B(D0 --> K- pi+) = (3.91+-0.08+-0.17)% and B(D^*()+ --> D0 pi+) = (68.1+-1.0+-1.3)%.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
BUSKULIC 1995N assumes fraction (B+) = fraction (B0) = 38.2+-1.3+-2.2% and meanlife(B0) = 1.58+-0.06ps. Gamma(D^*()- lepton+ nu_lepton)/total = [5.18-0.13(fraction(B0)-38.2)-1.5(meanlife(B0)-1.58)]%.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
ALBRECHT 1994 assumes B(D^*()+ --> D0 pi+) = 68.1+-1.0+-1.3%. Uses partial reconstruction of D^*()+ and is independent of D0 branching ratios.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
The measurement of ALBRECHT 1989C suggests a D^* polarization gamma_{{L}}/gamma_{{T}} of 0.85+-0.45. or alpha = 0.7+-0.9.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
ALBRECHT 1989J is ALBRECHT 1987J value rescaled using B(D^*(2010)- --> D0 pi-) = 0.57+-0.04+-0.04. Superseded by ALBRECHT 1993.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
We have taken average of the the BORTOLETTO 1989B values for electrons and muons, 0.046+-0.005+-0.007. We rescale using the method described in STONE 1994 but with the updated PDG 1994 B(D0 --> K- pi+). The measurement suggests a D^* polarization parameter value alpha = 0.65+-0.66+-0.25.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
ALBRECHT 1987J assume mu-e universality, the B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 0.45, the B(D0 --> K- pi+) = (0.042+-0.004+-0.004), and the B(D^*(2010)- --> D0 pi-) = 0.49+-0.08. Superseded by ALBRECHT 1989J.


pdgid: S042Q36
text:
LIVENTSEV 2008   reports 4.2+-0.7+-0.6E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Dbar0 pi- lepton+ nu_lepton)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton)] assuming B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.12+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.10+-0.07E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042Q36
text:
LIVENTSEV 2005   reports [G(B0 --> Dbar0 pi- lepton+ nu_lepton)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 lepton+ nu_lepton)] = 0.15+-0.03+-0.03 which we multiply by our best value B(B+ --> Dbar0 lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.26+-0.07E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S04
text:
Uses a simultaneous fit of all B semileptonic decays without full reconstruction of events. AUBERT 2009Y reports B(B0 --> Dbar_2^*(2460)- lepton+ nu_lepton) . B(Dbar_2^*(2460)- --> Dbar^(*)()0 pi-) =  1.77+-0.26+-0.11E-3 and the authors have provided us the individual measurement.


pdgid: S042Q37
text:
LIVENTSEV 2008   reports 5.6+-2.1+-0.8E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Dbar^*()0 pi- lepton+ nu_lepton)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton)] assuming B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.12+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.10+-0.07E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042Q37
text:
LIVENTSEV 2005   reports [G(B0 --> Dbar^*()0 pi- lepton+ nu_lepton)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 lepton+ nu_lepton)] = 0.10+-0.02+-0.01 which we multiply by our best value B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 lepton+ nu_lepton) = 5.26+-0.10E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R95
text:
Averaging with ALEXANDER 1996T results including experimental and theoretical correlations considered, BEHRENS 2000 reports systematic errors (-0.46)**+0.33+-0.41, where the second error is theoretical model dependence.  We combine these in quadrature.


pdgid: S042R95
text:
ATHAR 2003 reports systematic errors +0.47, which are experimental systematic, systematic due to residual form-factor uncertainties in the signal, and systematic due to residual form-factor uncertainties in the cross-feed modes, respectively. We combine these in quadrature.


pdgid: S042R95
text:
Uses isospin constraints and extrapolation to all electron energies according to five different form-factor calculations. The second error combines the systematic and theoretical uncertainties in quadrature.


pdgid: S042R95
text:
BEHRENS 2000 reports +0.35, where the second error is the theoretical model dependence.  We combine these in quadrature. B+ and B0 decays combined using isospin symmetry: Gamma(B0 --> rho- lepton+ nu)=2Gamma(B+ --> rho0 lepton+ nu)~~ 2Gamma(B+ --> omega lepton+ nu).  No evidence for omega lepton nu is reported.


pdgid: S042R95
text:
ALEXANDER 1996T reports +0.5 where the second error is the theoretical model dependence.  We combine these in quadrature. B+ and B0 decays combined using isospin symmetry: Gamma(B0 --> rho- lepton+ nu) =2Gamma(B+ --> rho0 lepton+ nu) ~~ 2Gamma(B+ --> omega lepton+ nu). No evidence for omega lepton nu is reported.


pdgid: S042R95
text:
BEAN 1993B limit set using ISGW Model.  Using isospin and the quark model to combine Gamma(rho0 lepton+ nu_lepton) and Gamma(omega lepton+ nu_lepton) with this result, they obtain a limit <(1.6 -- 2.7)*10**-4 at 90% CL for B+ --> (omega  or  rho0) lepton+ nu_lepton. The range corresponds to the ISGW, WSB, and KS models.  An upper limit on |V(ub)/V(cb)| <0.08 -- 0.13 at 90% CL is derived as well.


pdgid: S042S48
text:
Reports also a branching fraction value B(B0 --> pi- lepton+ nu) = 1.45+-0.04+-0.06E-4 from the decays of B+ and B0 that are combined using the isospin symmetry relation.


pdgid: S042S48
text:
Uses loose neutrino reconstruction technique. Assumes B(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-) = (51.6+-0.6)% and B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = (48.4+-0.6)%.


pdgid: S042S48
text:
Also report the rate for q**2> 16 GeV**2 of 0.41+-0.08+-0.04E-4 from which they obtain |V_(ub)| = 3.6+-0.4+-0.2+0.6-0.4 (last error is from theory).


pdgid: S042S48
text:
The analysis uses events in which the signal B decays are reconstructed with an innovative loose neutrino reconstruction technique.


pdgid: S042S48
text:
The signals are tagged by a second B meson reconstructed in a semileptonic or hadronic decay. The B0 and B+ results are combined assuming the isospin symmetry.


pdgid: S042S48
text:
ATHAR 2003 reports systematic errors 0.11+-0.01+-0.07, which are experimental systematic, systematic due to residual form-factor uncertainties in the signal, and systematic due to residual form-factor uncertainties in the cross-feed modes, respectively. We combine these in quadrature.


pdgid: S042S48
text:
ALEXANDER 1996T gives systematic errors +-0.3+-0.2 where the second error reflects the estimated model dependence.  We combine these in quadrature. Assumes isospin symmetry: Gamma(B0 --> pi- lepton+ nu) = 2xGamma(B+ --> pi0 lepton+ nu).


pdgid: S042R30
text:
ALBRECHT 1988K assumes B0 Bbar0:B+ B- production ratio is 45:55. Superseded by ALBRECHT 1990J which assumes 50:50.


pdgid: S042R30
text:
AUBERT,B 2004O  reports [G(B0 --> D- pi+)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K0S pi+)] = 42.7+-2.1+-2.2E-6 which we divide by our best value B(D+ --> K0S pi+) = 1.561+-0.031E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R30
text:
ALAM 1994   reports [G(B0 --> D- pi+)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] = 0.265+-0.032+-0.023E-3 which we divide by our best value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.38+-0.16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R33
text:
ALAM 1994   reports [G(B0 --> D- rho+)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] = 0.000704+-0.000096+-0.000070 which we divide by our best value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.38+-0.16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R1
text:
The second uncertainty combines in quadrature all systematic uncertainties quoted in the paper. AAIJ 2015Y reports B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-) = 8.46+-0.14+-0.49E-4 in the kinematic region m(Dbar0 pi+-) > 2.1 GeV which we corrected to the full phase-space dividing by 0.945 from Belle.


pdgid: S042R1
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses MarkIII branching fractions for the D. The product branching fraction into D_0^*(2340) pi followed by D_0^*(2340) --> D0 pi is <0.0001 at 90% CL and into D_{{2}}^*(2460) followed by D_2^*(2460) --> D0 pi is <0.0004 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S042R1
text:
BEBEK 1987 assume the Upsilon(4S) decays 43% to B0 Bbar0. We rescale to 50%. B(D0 --> K- pi+) = (4.2+-0.4+-0.4)% and B(D0 --> K- pi+ pi+ pi-) = (9.1+-0.8+-0.8)% were used.


pdgid: S042R1
text:
Corrected by us using assumptions: B(D0 --> K- pi+) = (0.042+-0.006) and B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 50%. The product branching ratio is B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-)B(Dbar0 --> K+ pi-) = 0.39+-0.26E-2.


pdgid: S042R2
text:
KROHN 2023   reports 2.623+-0.016+-0.086E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0)] assuming B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 0.486+-0.006.


pdgid: S042R2
text:
AUBERT,BE 2006J  reports [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- pi+)] = 0.99+-0.11+-0.08 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.51+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R2
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 4.0+-1.0+-0.7E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R2
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J  reports 2.8+-0.9+-0.6E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R2
text:
BEBEK 1987   reports 2.8+1.5-1.2+1.0-0.6E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R2
text:
Assumes B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.60+0.08-0.15. Assumes B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 0.40+-0.02  Does not depend on D branching ratios.


pdgid: S042R19
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J  reports 0.018+-0.004+-0.005 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R3
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 0.019+-0.008+-0.011 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- rho+)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R3
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J  reports 0.007+-0.003+-0.003 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- rho+)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R3
text:
MATVIENKO 2015 reports B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- rho+ , rho+ --> omega pi+) = 1.48+-0.27+0.15-0.09+0.21-0.56E-3.  The last uncertainty is a model one.


pdgid: S042R3
text:
This decay is nearly completely longitudinally polarized, Gamma(L)/Gamma = (93+-5+-5)%, as expected from the factorization hypothesis (ROSNER 1990).  The nonresonant pi+ pi0 contribution under the rho+ is less than 9% at 90% CL.


pdgid: S042R3
text:
Uses B(D^* --> D0 pi+) = 0.6+-0.15 and B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 0.4. Does not depend on D branching ratios.


pdgid: S042B5
text:
KROHN 2023   reports 2.221+-0.063+-0.077E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- K+)/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0)] assuming B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 0.486+-0.006.


pdgid: S042B5
text:
AUBERT 2006A  reports [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- K+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+)] = 0.0776+-0.0034+-0.0029 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+) = 2.66+-0.07E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B5
text:
ABE 2001I  reports [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- K+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+)] = 0.074+-0.015+-0.006 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+) = 2.66+-0.07E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R20
text:
The three pion mass is required to be between 1.0 and 1.6 GeV consistent with an a_{{1}} meson. (If this channel is dominated by a_{{1}}()+, the branching ratio for Dbar^*()- a_1()+ is twice that for Dbar^*()- pi+ pi+ pi-.)


pdgid: S042R20
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 0.0159+-0.0028+-0.0037 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R20
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J  reports 0.012+-0.003+-0.004 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R90
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses MarkIII branching fractions for the D and D^*(2010).


pdgid: S042R92
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 0.0068+-0.0032+-0.0021 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+ rho0)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R87
text:
ALAM 1994 value is twice their Gamma(D^*(2010)- pi+ pi+ pi-)/Gamma(total) value based on their observation that the three pions are dominantly in the a_{{1}}(1260) mass range 1.0 to 1.6 GeV.


pdgid: S042R87
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 0.018+-0.006+-0.006 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- a_1(1260)+)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R65
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J  reports 0.041+-0.015+-0.016 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+ pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B7
text:
The signal is consistent with all observed omega pi+ having proceeded through the rho^'+ resonance at mass 1349+-25+10-5 MeV and width 547+-86+46-45 MeV.


pdgid: S042B75
text:
The measurement is obtained by amplitude analysis of B0 --> D^*()- omega pi+. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature experimental systematic and model uncertainties.


pdgid: S042B75
text:
Obtained by fitting the events with cos( theta(D^*()) ) < 0.5 and scaling up the result by a factor of 4/3. No interference effects between B0 --> D_1^'() omega and D^* omega pi are assumed.


pdgid: S042C45
text:
Obtained by amplitude analysis of Bbar0 --> D^*()- omega pi+. The second uncertainty combines in  qudrature experimental systematic and model uncertainties.


pdgid: S042R77
text:
AUBERT,BE 2006J  reports [G(B0 --> Dbar^**()- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- pi+)] = 0.77+-0.22+-0.29 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.51+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S22
text:
Result obtained using the isobar formalism. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature all systematic uncertainties quoted in the paper.


pdgid: S042R48
text:
ZUPANC 2007   reports 7.5+-0.2+-1.1E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.4+-0.6E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R48
text:
AUBERT 2006N  reports 0.64+-0.13+-0.10E-2 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.0462+-0.0062, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R48
text:
GIBAUT 1996   reports 0.0087+-0.0024+-0.0020 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R48
text:
ALBRECHT 1992G  reports 0.017+-0.013+-0.006 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R48
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 0.0080+-0.0045+-0.0030 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.030+-0.011, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R47
text:
AUBERT 2006N  reports 0.71+-0.13+-0.09E-2 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.0462+-0.0062, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R47
text:
AUBERT 2003I  reports 0.0103+-0.0014+-0.0013 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R47
text:
AHMED 2000B  reports 0.0110+-0.0018+-0.0011 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R47
text:
Assumes PDG 1990 D+ and D^*(2010)+ branching ratios, e.g., B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.71+-0.25%, B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 7.1+-1.0%, and B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 55+-4%.


pdgid: S042R47
text:
ALBRECHT 1992G  reports 0.014+-0.010+-0.003 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R47
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 0.016+-0.009+-0.006 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.030+-0.011, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R47
text:
GIBAUT 1996   reports 0.0093+-0.0023+-0.0016 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R98
text:
AUBERT 2006N  reports 0.69+-0.16+-0.09E-2 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.0462+-0.0062, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R98
text:
GIBAUT 1996   reports 0.0100+-0.0035+-0.0022 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R98
text:
ALBRECHT 1992G  reports 0.027+-0.017+-0.009 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R00
text:
AUBERT 2006N  reports 1.68+-0.21+-0.19E-2 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.0462+-0.0062, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R00
text:
A partial reconstruction technique is used and the result is independent of the particle decay rate of D_{{S}}()+ meson. It also provides a model-independent determination of B(D_S()+ --> phi pi+) = (4.81+-0.52+-0.38)%.


pdgid: S042R00
text:
AUBERT 2003I  reports 0.0197+-0.0015+-0.0030 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R00
text:
AHMED 2000B  reports 0.0182+-0.0037+-0.0025 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R00
text:
ALBRECHT 1992G  reports 0.026+-0.014+-0.006 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R00
text:
GIBAUT 1996   reports 0.0203+-0.0050+-0.0036 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P66
text:
AAIJ 2021S  reports [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)] * [B(D_s^*()+ --> D_s()+ gamma)] = 2.045+-0.022+-0.071 which we divide by our best value B(D_s^*()+ --> D_s()+ gamma) = 93.6+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R64
text:
AUBERT 2003I  reports 3.00+-0.19+-0.39E-2 from a measurement of [[G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)+ G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R64
text:
BORTOLETTO 1990   reports 7.5+-2.0E-2 from a measurement of [[G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)+ G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.02, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042Q55
text:
DRUTSKOY 2005   reports 5.3+1.5-1.3+-1.6E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s0(2317)- K+  ,  D_s0()- --> D_s()- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B57
text:
CHOI 2015A  reports 10.2+1.3-1.2+-1.0+-0.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s0^*(2317)+ D-  ,  D_s0^*()+ --> D_s()+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.39+-0.21E-2,B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.13+-0.19E-2, which we rescale to our best values B(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.45+-0.08E-2, B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.38+-0.16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S042B57
text:
AUBERT,B 2004S  reports 1.8+-0.4+0.7-0.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s0^*(2317)+ D-  ,  D_s0^*()+ --> D_s()+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B57
text:
KROKOVNY 2003B  reports 0.86+0.33-0.26+-0.26E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s0^*(2317)+ D-  ,  D_s0^*()+ --> D_s()+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B58
text:
AUBERT,B 2004S  reports [G(B0 --> D_sJ(2457)+ D-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0)] = 2.3+1.0-0.7+-0.3E-3 which we divide by our best value B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0) = 48+-11E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B58
text:
KROKOVNY 2003B  reports [G(B0 --> D_sJ(2457)+ D-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0)] = 1.9+0.7-0.6+-0.2E-3 which we divide by our best value B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0) = 48+-11E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042Q10
text:
AUBERT,B 2004S  reports 0.8+-0.2+0.3-0.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_sJ(2457)+ D()-  ,  D_sJ()+ --> D_s()+ gamma)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042Q10
text:
KROKOVNY 2003B  reports 0.82+0.22-0.19+-0.25E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_sJ(2457)+ D()-  ,  D_sJ()+ --> D_s()+ gamma)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042Q09
text:
AUBERT,B 2004S  reports [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_sJ(2457)+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0)] = 5.5+-1.2+2.2-1.6E-3 which we divide by our best value B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0) = 48+-11E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C05
text:
Derived using tan(theta_{{C}}) f_{{D}}/f(D_{{s}}()) sqrt( B(B0 --> D_s()+ pi-) / B(B0 --> D- pi+) ) by assuming the flavor SU(3) symmetry, where theta_{{C}} is the Cabibbo angle, f_{{D}} (f(D_{{s}}())) is the D (D_{{s}}()) meson decay constant.


pdgid: S042C05
text:
DAS 2010   reports [G(B0 --> D+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- pi+)] = 2.92+-0.38+-0.31E-4 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.51+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R49
text:
AUBERT 2007K  reports [G(B0 --> D_s()+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.63+-0.15+-0.05E-6 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R49
text:
AUBERT 2003D  reports [G(B0 --> D_s()+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 1.13+-0.33+-0.21E-6 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R49
text:
KROKOVNY 2002   reports [G(B0 --> D_s()+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.86+0.37-0.30+-0.11E-6 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R49
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <270E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S4
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <1.7E-3 from a measurement of [[G(B0 --> D_s()+ pi-)/G(total)+ G(B0 --> D_s()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S17
text:
AUBERT 2007K  reports [G(B0 --> D_s^*()+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 1.32+-0.27+-0.15E-6 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S17
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <44E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S6
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <1.2E-3 from a measurement of [[G(B0 --> D_s^*()+ pi-)/G(total)+ G(B0 --> D_s^*()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S7
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <2.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()+ rho-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S7
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <6.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()+ rho-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S8
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <2.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()+ rho-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S8
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <7.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()+ rho-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S9
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <3.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()+ a_1(1260)-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S10
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <2.9E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()+ a_1(1260)-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042R50
text:
AUBERT 2007K  reports [G(B0 --> D_s()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 1.21+-0.17+-0.11E-6 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R50
text:
AUBERT 2003D  reports [G(B0 --> D_s()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 1.16+-0.36+-0.24E-6 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R50
text:
KROKOVNY 2002   reports [G(B0 --> D_s()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 1.61+0.45-0.38+-0.21E-6 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R50
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <230E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S18
text:
AUBERT 2007K  reports [G(B0 --> D_s^*()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.97+-0.24+-0.12E-6 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S18
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <17E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S11
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <4.6E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()- K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S11
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <9.7E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()- K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S12
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <5.8E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()- K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S12
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <11.0E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()- K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S13
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <7.3E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()- pi+ K0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S14
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <4.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()- pi+ K0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042C10
text:
AAIJ 2012AX reports [G(B0 --> D_s()- K+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B_s()0 --> D_s()- K+ pi+ pi-)] = 0.54+-0.07+-0.07 which we multiply by our best value B(B_s()0 --> D_s()- K+ pi+ pi-) = 3.2+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S15
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <5.0E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()- pi+ K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S16
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <2.7E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()- pi+ K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042B47
text:
Measured via amplitude analysis of B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-, which excludes contribution from decay via D^*(2010)- resonance.


pdgid: S042B47
text:
AAIJ 2015X  reports 5.13+-0.20+-0.15+-0.24+-0.60E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Dbar0 K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 9.2+-0.6+-0.7+-0.6E-5, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 8.8+-1.7E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C37
text:
Measured via amplitude analysis of B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-, which excludes contribution from decay  via D^*(2010)- resonance.


pdgid: S042C38
text:
AAIJ 2015X  reports 0.71+-0.27+-0.33+-0.47+-0.08E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Dbar0 K_0^*(1430)0)/G(total)] * [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 9.2+-0.6+-0.7+-0.6E-5, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 8.8+-1.7E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C39
text:
AAIJ 2015X  reports 2.04+-0.45+-0.30+-0.54+-0.25E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Dbar0 K_2^*(1430)0)/G(total)] * [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 9.2+-0.6+-0.7+-0.6E-5, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 8.8+-1.7E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C40
text:
AAIJ 2015X  reports 1.77+-0.26+-0.19+-0.67+-0.20E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_0^*(2300)- K+  ,  D_0^*()- --> Dbar0 pi-)/G(total)] * [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 9.2+-0.6+-0.7+-0.6E-5, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 8.8+-1.7E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042Q52
text:
AAIJ 2015X  reports 2.12+-0.10+-0.11+-0.11+-0.25E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_2^*(2460)- K+  ,  D_2^*()- --> Dbar0 pi-)/G(total)] * [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 9.2+-0.6+-0.7+-0.6E-5, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 8.8+-1.7E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S26
text:
NEMATI 1998 assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the PDG 1996 values for D0, D^*()0, eta, eta^', and omega branching fractions.


pdgid: S042R34
text:
Measured using isobar formalism in the decay chain B0 --> Dbar0 rho(770) , rho --> pi+ pi- assuming B(rho(770) --> pi+ pi-) = 1. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature all systematic uncertainties quoted in the paper.


pdgid: S042Q73
text:
Result obtained using the isobar formalism. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature all systematic uncertainties quoted in the paper. Measured in the decay chain B0 --> Dbar0 f_2(1270) , f_2() --> pi+ pi-.


pdgid: S042S29
text:
Result obtained using the isobar model. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature all systematic uncertainties quoted in the paper.


pdgid: S042P99
text:
The last uncertainty includes the uncertainties of the branching fractions B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-) and  B(phi --> K+ K-).


pdgid: S042B97
text:
Uses D0 --> K- pi+ mode. Restricts K+ pi- mass within +-50 MeV of the nominal K^*()0 mass. Corresponds to the upper limit, < 0.16 at 95% CL.


pdgid: S042B97
text:
Reports a signal at the level of 2.5 standard deviations after combining results from D0 --> K+ pi-, K+ pi- pi0, and K+ pi- pi+ pi-.


pdgid: S042S70
text:
The last uncertainty includes the uncertainties of the branching fraction B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-) and  B(phi --> K+ K-).


pdgid: S042S52
text:
BARATE 1998Q (ALEPH) observes 2 events with an expected background of 0.10+-0.03 which corresponds to a branching ratio of 2.3+1.9-1.2+-0.4E-3.


pdgid: S042S52
text:
ASNER 1997 at CLEO observes 1 event with an expected background of 0.022+-0.011.  This corresponds to a branching ratio of 5.3+7.1-3.7+-1.0E-4.


pdgid: S042S82
text:
The measurement is performed using a partial reconstruction technique for the D^* and fully reconstructed D+ decays as a cross check.


pdgid: S042S88
text:
CHILIKIN 2019   reports [G(B0 --> eta_c K0)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)] = 38.0+6.4-2.9+1.3-4.7E-7 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-) = 3.7+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S88
text:
AUBERT 2007AV reports [G(B0 --> eta_c K0)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)] = 0.83+0.28-0.26+-0.05E-6 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar) = 1.33+-0.11E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S88
text:
AUBERT,B 2004B  reports [G(B0 --> eta_c K0)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)] = 0.0648+-0.0085+-0.0071E-3 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi) = 7.1+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P28
text:
AAIJ 2018AN reports [G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K+ pi-)/G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K+ pi-)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 0.357+-0.015+-0.008 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar) = 1.33+-0.11E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S042P32
text:
AAIJ 2018AN reports [G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K^*(1410)0)/G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K+ pi-)] * [B(K^*(1410) --> K pi)] = 0.021+-0.011+-0.011 which we divide by our best value B(K^*(1410) --> K pi) = 6.6+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P34
text:
AAIJ 2018AN reports [G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K_0^*(1430)0)/G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K+ pi-)] * [B(K_0^*(1430) --> K pi)] = 0.253+-0.035+0.035-0.028 which we divide by our best value B(K_0^*(1430) --> K pi) = 93+-10E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P35
text:
AAIJ 2018AN reports [G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K_2^*(1430)0)/G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K+ pi-)] * [B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi)] = 0.041+-0.015+0.010-0.016 which we divide by our best value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = 49.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P36
text:
AAIJ 2018AN reports [G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K^*(1680)0)/G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K+ pi-)] * [B(K^*(1680) --> K pi)] = 0.022+-0.020+0.015-0.017 which we divide by our best value B(K^*(1680) --> K pi) = 38.7+-2.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P37
text:
AAIJ 2018AN reports [G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K_0^*(1950)0)/G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K+ pi-)] * [B(K_0^*(1950) --> K- pi+)] = 0.038+-0.018+0.014-0.025 which we divide by our best value B(K_0^*(1950) --> K- pi+) = 52+-14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B43
text:
AAIJ 2018AN reports B(B0 --> eta_c K^*(892)0 , K^*(892)0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.95+-0.16+0.36-0.44E-4 using  the fitted fraction of 0.514+-0.019+0.017-0.048 from Dalitz decay of B(B0 --> eta_c K+ pi-)=5.73+-0.24+-0.67E-4 and  corrected for B(K^*(892)0 --> K+ pi-) = 2/3.


pdgid: S042B43
text:
AUBERT 2008AB reports [G(B0 --> eta_c K^*(892)0)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> eta_c K+)] = 0.62+-0.06+-0.05 which we multiply by our best value B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 1.10+-0.07E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B43
text:
AUBERT 2007AV reports [G(B0 --> eta_c K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)] = 1.03+0.27-0.24+-0.17E-6 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar) = 1.33+-0.11E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R23
text:
CHILIKIN 2019   reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)] = 48.6+4.6-4.4+2.4-2.6E-7 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-) = 6.0+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R23
text:
AUBERT 2007AV reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 1.87+0.28-0.26+-0.07E-6 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R23
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 6+-3+-2E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R23
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J  reports 8+-6+-2E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R4
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 1.0+-0.4+-0.3E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R4
text:
ALBRECHT 1987D assume B+ B-/B0 Bbar0 ratio is 55/45. K pi system is specifically selected as nonresonant.


pdgid: S042R22
text:
AUBERT 2007AV reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 2.82+0.30-0.28+0.36-0.35E-6 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R22
text:
ABE 1998O reports [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)]/[B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] =1.76+-0.14+-0.15.  We multiply by our best value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)=9.9+-1.0E-4.  Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R22
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports 1.1+-0.5+-0.3E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R22
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J  reports 1.1+-0.5+-0.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R22
text:
BEBEK 1987   reports 3.5+-1.6+-0.3E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R22
text:
The neutral and charged B events together are predominantly longitudinally polarized, Gamma(L)/Gamma =0.080+-0.08+-0.05. This can be compared with a prediction using HQET, 0.73 (KRAMER 1992).  This polarization indicates that the B --> psi K^* decay is dominated by the CP = -1 CP eigenstate.


pdgid: S042R22
text:
ALBRECHT 1994G measures the polarization in the vector-vector decay to be predominantly longitudinal, Gamma(T)/Gamma = 0.03+-0.16+-0.15 making the neutral decay a CP eigenstate when the K^*()0 decays through K0S pi0.


pdgid: S042R22
text:
ALAM 1986 assumes B+-/B0 ratio is 60/40. The observation of the decay B+ --> J/psi K^*(892)+ (HAAS 1985) has been retracted in this paper.


pdgid: S042B6
text:
Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses the PDG value of B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.00+-0.10E-3.


pdgid: S042S35
text:
AAIJ 2024N  reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi0)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)+)] = 1.153+-0.053+-0.048E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)+) = 1.43+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S51
text:
AAIJ 2015D  reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) eta)/G(total)] / [B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) eta)] = 1.85+-0.61+-0.14E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) eta) = 4.0+-0.7E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B45
text:
AAIJ 2013M does not report correlations between various measurements of the J/psi pi pi final state.


pdgid: S042B45
text:
AAIJ 2013M  reports 3.97+-0.09+-0.11+-0.16E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] assuming B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.018+-0.042E-3, which we rescale to our best value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C11
text:
AAIJ 2013M does not report correlations between various measurements of the J/psi pi pi final state. Measured in Dalitz plot like analysis of B0 --> J/psi pi+ pi-.


pdgid: S042C11
text:
AAIJ 2013M  reports 6.4+-0.8+2.4-0.8E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) f_0(500)  ,  f_0() --> pi pi)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.97+-0.09+-0.11+-0.16E-5, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.99+-0.15E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042Q75
text:
AAIJ 2013M  reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) f_2)/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] = 3.5+-0.4+-0.4E-6 from a measurement of [[G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) f_2)/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.97+-0.09+-0.11+-0.16E-5, which we rescale to our best values B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3+2.8-1.0E-2, B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.99+-0.15E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S042Q75
text:
AUBERT 2007AC reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) f_2)/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] < 0.46E-5 which we divide by our best value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3E-2.


pdgid: S042S46
text:
AAIJ 2014X uses Dalitz plot analysis of B0 --> J/psi pi+ pi-.  We assume B(rho(770)0 --> pi+ pi-) = 100%.


pdgid: S042S46
text:
AAIJ 2013M does not report correlations between various measurements of the J/psi pi pi final state. Measured in Dalitz plot like analysis of B0 --> J/psi pi+ pi-. Assumes B(rho(770)0 --> pi pi) = 100%.


pdgid: S042S46
text:
AAIJ 2013M  reports 2.49+0.20-0.13+0.16-0.23E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) rho()0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.97+-0.09+-0.11+-0.16E-5, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.99+-0.15E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C12
text:
AAIJ 2013M does not provide correlations between various measurements of the J/psi pi+ pi- final state. The measurements were obtained from a Dalitz plot like analysis of B0 --> J/psi pi+ pi-.  Also reports  = 6.1+3.1-2.0+1.7-1.4E-6.


pdgid: S042C13
text:
AAIJ 2013M  reports 2.1+1.0-0.6+2.2-0.4E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) rho(1450)0  ,  rho()0 --> pi pi)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.97+-0.09+-0.11+-0.16E-5, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.99+-0.15E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S47
text:
AAIJ 2014X  reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) omega)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-)] = 2.7+0.8-0.6+0.7-0.5E-7 which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-) = 1.53+-0.12E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C14
text:
AAIJ 2013M  reports 0.61+0.24-0.14+0.31-0.16 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) omega)/G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) rho()0)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-)] assuming B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-) = 1.53+0.11-0.13E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-) = 1.53+-0.12E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042BA1
text:
AAIJ 2013BT reports 2.53+-0.31+-0.19E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] assuming B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.018+-0.042E-3, which we rescale to our best value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042BA2
text:
AAIJ 2013BT uses B(Bbar0 --> J/psi K+ K-) = 2.53+-0.31+-0.19E-6 to derive this result. It also reports the equivalent upper limit of < 9.0E-7 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S042B53
text:
AAIJ 2013BT uses B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K+ K-) = 2.53+-0.31+-0.19E-6 and B(phi --> K+ K-) = (48.9+-0.5)% to obtain this result.


pdgid: S042B54
text:
AAIJ 2015D  reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) eta^'(958))/G(total)] / [B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) eta^')] = 2.28+-0.65+-0.16E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) eta^') = 3.3+-0.4E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C23
text:
Measured with B(B0 --> J/psi K0S K+ K-) / B(B0 --> J/psi K0S) using PDG 2012 for the involved branching fractions.


pdgid: S042RB3
text:
Measured with B(B0 --> J/psi K0S K+- pi-+) / B(B0 --> J/psi K0S pi+ pi-) using PDG 2012 values for the involved branching fractions.


pdgid: S042C22
text:
AAIJ 2014Y  reports 8.37+-1.95+0.71-0.66+-0.35E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) f_1(1285))/G(total)] * [B(f_1(1285) --> 2pi+ 2pi-)] assuming B(f_1(1285) --> 2pi+ 2pi-) = 0.11+0.007-0.006, which we rescale to our best value B(f_1(1285) --> 2pi+ 2pi-) = 10.9+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
HIRATA 2023   reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 1.34+0.47-0.40+0.10-0.12 which we multiply by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
CHOI 2011   reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 0.50+-0.14+-0.04 which we multiply by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010B  reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> omega J/psi(1S))] = 6+-3+-1E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> omega J/psi(1S)) = 5.0+-1.9E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
BHARDWAJ 2011   reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi)] < 2.4E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi) = 10E-3.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
AUSHEV 2010   reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0)] = 0.97+-0.46+-0.13E-4 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0) = 46+-16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
AUBERT 2009B  reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi)] < 4.9E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi) = 10E-3.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
AUBERT 2008B  reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0)] = 2.22+-1.05+-0.42E-4 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0) = 46+-16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
AUBERT 2008Y  reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] < 6.0E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3E-2.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
AUBERT 2006   reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] < 10.3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3E-2.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
GOKHROO 2006   reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> D0 Dbar0 pi0)] = 1.66+-0.70+0.32-0.37E-4 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> D0 Dbar0 pi0) = 55+-28E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
Measure the near-threshold enhancements in the (D0 Dbar^0() pi0) system at a mass 3875.2+-0.7+0.3-1.6+-0.8 MeV/c**2.


pdgid: S042P60
text:
BALA 2015   reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] = 4.0+-1.5+-0.3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P60
text:
AUBERT 2009B  reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi)] < 2.8E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi) = 10E-3.


pdgid: S042P60
text:
AUBERT 2009B reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma psi(2S))]  < 4.4E-6 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S042P61
text:
BALA 2015   reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] = 7.9+-1.3+-0.4E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P62
text:
CHOU 2019   reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) gamma)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] < 5.1E-7 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3E-2.


pdgid: S042B52
text:
Measured relative to B_s()0 --> J/psi phi assuming B( B_s()0 --> J/psi phi) = 10.5+-0.13+-0.64E-4 and  taking into account small  K+ K- S-wave contribution. Measurement assumes f(s)/f(d) =  0.259+-0.015 for 7, 8 TeV data and f(s)/f(d) multiplied by 1.068+-0.046 for 13  TeV data.


pdgid: S042Q04
text:
Branching fractions of normalization modes B0 --> J/psi gamma X taken from PDG 2014.  Uses f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.259+-0.015.


pdgid: S042R66
text:
Measured with B(B0 --> psi(2S) K0S) x B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) / B(B0  --> J/psi K0S) using PDG 2012 values for the involved branching fractions.


pdgid: S042QA1
text:
Assuming lepton universality for dimuon decay modes of J/psi and psi(2S) mesons, the ratio B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-)/B(psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = B(J/psi --> e+ e-)/B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.69+-0.19 was used.


pdgid: S042R68
text:
Combines measurements with psi(2S) --> lepton+ lepton- with measurement from MIZUK 2009 which uses psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-.


pdgid: S042R67
text:
ABE 1998O reports [B(B0 --> psi(2S) K^*(892)0)]/[B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] =0.908+-0.194+-0.10.  We multiply by our best value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)=9.9+-1.0E-4.  Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042T97
text:
AAIJ 2012L  reports 0.476+-0.014+-0.010+-0.012 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> psi(2S) K^*(892)0)/G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] / [B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.94+-0.06E-2,B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.72+-0.17E-3, which we rescale to our best values B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2, B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.94+-0.22E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S042S89
text:
AAIJ 2018F uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B0 --> K0S pi+ pi- final state decays. For  the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 2018 average B(B0 --> K0S pi+ pi-) =  4.96+-0.20E-5 is used. We compute B(B0 --> chi_c0() K0) using the PDG value  B(chi_c0() --> pi pi) = 8.51+-0.33E-3 and 2/3 for the pi+ pi- fraction. Our first  error is their experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best  value.


pdgid: S042S89
text:
LEES 2012I  reports [G(B0 --> chi_c0() K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> K0S K0S)] = 0.46+0.25-0.17+-0.21E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c0(1P) --> K0S K0S) = 3.18+-0.19E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S24
text:
CHILIKIN 2019   reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1 K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)] = 7.4+2.4-2.0+0.6-0.4E-7 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-) = 5.0+-1.9E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S24
text:
AVERY 2000   reports 3.9+1.9-1.3+-0.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> chi_c1 K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S24
text:
AUBERT 2002   reports 5.4+-1.4+-1.1E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> chi_c1 K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B3
text:
AUBERT 2002   reports 0.66+-0.11+-0.17 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> chi_c1 K0)/G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C16
text:
LEES 2012B  reports 0.474+-0.013+-0.026 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> chi_c1 pi- K+)/G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K+ pi-)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.4+-1.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S25
text:
AUBERT 2002   reports 4.8+-1.4+-0.9E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> chi_c1 K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B92
text:
Uses chi_c1() --> J/psi gamma mode. Uses chi_c1() --> J/psi gamma mode. Finds a good description of the data without this B0 --> X(4051)+ K- decay mode in a fit.


pdgid: S042B93
text:
Uses chi_c1() --> J/psi gamma mode. Finds a good description of the data without this B0 --> X(4248)+ K- decay mode in a fit.


pdgid: S042R10
text:
ADAM 1996D assumes f(B0) = f(B-) = 0.39 and f(B_{{s}}) = 0.12. Contributions from B0 and B_{{s}} decays cannot be separated.  Limits are given for the weighted average of the decay rates for the two neutral B mesons.


pdgid: S042R10
text:
Assumes a B0, B- production fraction of 0.39 and a B_{{s}} production fraction of 0.12. Contributions from B0 and B_{{s}}()0 decays cannot be separated.  Limits are given for the weighted average of the decay rates for the two neutral B mesons.


pdgid: S042S41
text:
This is the combined result of this analysis (ADACHI 2024) and the updated analysis of  ADACHI 2023E. The individual results are 10.40+-0.66+-0.60E-6 and 11.15+-0.68+-0.62E-6,  respectively.


pdgid: S042Q07
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B0 --> K+ pi- pi0 decays. The quoted value is only for the flat part of the non-resonant component.


pdgid: S042B00
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B0 --> K0S pi+ pi- final state decays. For the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 2018 average B(B0 --> K0S pi+ pi-) =  4.96+-0.20E-5 is used.


pdgid: S042P43
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B0 --> K0S pi+ pi- final state decays.  (Kpi)_{0}^*() is the S-wave component of K0 pi+. For the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 2018 average B(B0 --> K0S pi+ pi-) =  4.96+-0.20E-5 is used.


pdgid: S042B06
text:
GARMASH 2007 reports B(B0 --> f_2(1270) K0)xB(f_2(1270) --> pi+ pi-) <1.4E-6 using Dalitz plot analysis. We compute B(B0 --> f_2(1270) K0) using the PDG value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) =  and 2/3 for the pi+ pi- fraction.


pdgid: S042B06
text:
GARMASH 2007   reports [G(B0 --> f_2(1270) K0)/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] < 2.1E-6 which we divide by our best value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3E-2.


pdgid: S042R72
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B0 --> K0S pi+ pi- final state decays. We compute B(B0 --> K_2^*(1430)+ pi-) using  the PDG 2018 value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) =  and 2/3 for the  K0 pi+ fraction. For the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 2018 average  B(B0 --> K0S pi+ pi-) = 4.96+-0.20E-5 is used.


pdgid: S042R72
text:
GARMASH 2007 reports B(B0 --> K_2^*(1430)+ pi-)xB(K_2^*()+ --> K0 pi+) <2.1E-6 using Dalitz plot analysis. We compute B(B0 --> K_2^*(1430)+ pi-) using the PDG value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) =  and 2/3 for the K0 pi+ fraction.


pdgid: S042R72
text:
GARMASH 2007   reports [G(B0 --> K_2^*(1430)+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi)] < 3.15E-6 which we divide by our best value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = 49.9E-2.


pdgid: S042B03
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B0 --> K0S pi+ pi- final state decays. We compute B(B0 --> K_2^*(1430)+ pi-)  using the PDG 2018 value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = 49.9+-1.2E-2 and 2/3 for the  K0 pi+ fraction. For the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 2018 average  B(B0 --> K0S pi+ pi-) = 4.96+-0.20E-5 is used.


pdgid: S042B03
text:
GARMASH 2007 reports B(B0 --> K^*(1680)+ pi-)xB(K^*()+ --> K0 pi+) <2.6E-6 using Dalitz plot analysis. We compute B(B0 --> K^*(1680)+ pi-) using the PDG value B(K^*(1680) --> K pi)= and 2/3 for the K0 pi+ fraction.


pdgid: S042B03
text:
GARMASH 2007   reports [G(B0 --> K^*(1680)+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(K^*(1680) --> K pi)] < 3.9E-6 which we divide by our best value B(K^*(1680) --> K pi) = 38.7E-2.


pdgid: S042R15
text:
Assumes a helicity 00 configuration.  For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 2.4E-5.


pdgid: S042S1
text:
AAIJ 2012AR reports [G(B0 --> K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B_s()0 --> K+ K-)] / [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.018+0.008-0.007+-0.009 which we multiply by our best values B(B_s()0 --> K+ K-) = 2.72+-0.23E-5, [G(bbar --> B_s()0)G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.246+-0.023. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S042S1
text:
Obtains this result from B(K+ K-)/B(K+ pi-) = 0.020+-0.008+-0.006, assuming B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.4+-0.6E-6.


pdgid: S042S1
text:
ABULENCIA,A 2006D obtains this from Gamma(K+ K-)/Gamma(K+ pi-) < 0.10 at 90% CL, assuming B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 18.9+-0.7E-6.


pdgid: S042T74
text:
Measured in the range 0.7< mass(K pi)< 1.7 and corrected using PS assumption for the full K pi mass range.


pdgid: S042T30
text:
Measured in the range 0.7< mass(K pi)< 1.7 and corrected using PS assumption for the full K pi mass range.  The quoted result is equivalent to the upper limit of <13.9E-6 at 90%CL.


pdgid: S042S87
text:
AAIJ 2019L  reports [G(B0 --> K^*(892)0 Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] / [B(B_s()0 --> Kbar^*(892)0 K^*(892)0)] = 0.0758+-0.0057+-0.0030 which we multiply by our best value B(B_s()0 --> Kbar^*(892)0 K^*(892)0) = 1.11+-0.27E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S87
text:
Measured in the range 0.7< mass(K pi)< 1.7 and corrected using PS assumption for the full K pi mass range.  The quoted result is equivalent to the upper limit of <0.8E-6 at 90%CL.


pdgid: S042S87
text:
Assumes a helicity 00 configuration.  For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 1.9E-5.


pdgid: S042B9
text:
Assumes a helicity 00 configuration.  For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 2.9E-5.


pdgid: S042B10
text:
Assumes a helicity 00 configuration.  For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 8.9E-5.


pdgid: S042R76
text:
The angular distribution of B --> phi K^*(1430) provides evidence with statistical significance of 3.2~sigma.


pdgid: S042R16
text:
Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S). No evidence for a nonresonant K pi gamma contamination was seen; the central value assumes no contamination.


pdgid: S042R58
text:
PAL 2015 signal significance is 3.0 standard deviations. The measurement corresponds to  90% CL upper limit of < 6.5E-7.


pdgid: S042S76
text:
GUAN 2024   reports 1.53+-0.29+-0.17E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> omega omega)/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0)] assuming B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 48.4+-1.2E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 48.6+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R26
text:
Assumes a helicity 00 configuration.  For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 1.4E-5.


pdgid: S042R27
text:
DALSENO 2012 reports B(B0 --> a_1()+- pi-+) B(a_1()+- --> pi+- pi+ pi-) = 11.1+-1.0+-1.4E-6 which we rescaled assuming a_{{1}}(1260) decays only to 3pi and B(a_1()+- --> pi+- pi+ pi-) = 0.5.


pdgid: S042R28
text:
DALSENO 2012 reports B(B0 --> a_2()+- pi-+) B(a_2()+- --> pi+- pi+ pi-) < 2.2E-6 which we rescaled using B(a_2()+- --> pi+- pi+ pi-) = 1/2 B() = 0.35+-0.013.


pdgid: S042R55
text:
The quoted result is obtained after combining with AUBERT 2004G result by AUBERT 2004R alone gives 33+-4+-5E-6.


pdgid: S042R31
text:
AAIJ 2017BD reports [G(B0 --> p pbar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-)] = 1.07+-0.04+-0.04 which we multiply by our best values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3, B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-) = 99.902+-0.009E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S042R31
text:
Assumes equal production of B0 and B+ from Upsilon(4S) decays. This measurement is quoted for M(pi+ pi-) < 1.22 GeV excluding the 0.46 <  M(pi+ pi-) < 0.53 GeV region.


pdgid: S042B23
text:
Explicitly vetoes resonant production of p pbar from charmonium states and p K0 production from Lambda_{{c}}.


pdgid: S042P22
text:
AAIJ 2017BD reports [G(B0 --> p pbar K+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-)] = 2.34+-0.12+-0.12 which we multiply by our best values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3, B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-) = 99.902+-0.009E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S042P23
text:
AAIJ 2017BD reports [G(B0 --> p pbar K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-)] = 0.045+-0.011+-0.004 which we multiply by our best values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3, B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-) = 99.902+-0.009E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S042P27
text:
AAIJ 2023AD reports 2.2+-0.4+-0.1+-0.1E-8 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> p pbar p pbar)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3,B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3.


pdgid: S042Q85
text:
Excluding charmonium events in 2.85 < mass(Lambda Lambdabar)< 3.128 GeV/c**2  and  3.315 < mass(Lambda Lambdabar)< 3.735 GeV/c**2. Measurements in various mass(Lambda Lambdabar) bins are also reported.


pdgid: S042B08
text:
MEDVEDEVA 2007   reports 2.9+-0.7+-0.5+-0.4E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()- Lambdabar p)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.4+-0.6E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S21
text:
PROCARIO 1994   reports <0.0012 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c()-- Delta()++)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.043, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35E-2.


pdgid: S042S59
text:
Uses Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+ mode. The second error includes the uncertainty of the branching fraction of the Lambda_{{c}} decay, B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = (5.0+-1.3)%.


pdgid: S042S59
text:
PARK 2007   reports 11.2+-0.5+-3.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S59
text:
DYTMAN 2002   reports 1.67+0.27-0.25E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S59
text:
GABYSHEV 2002   reports 1.1+-0.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S55
text:
AUBERT 2008BN reports 1.89+-0.21+-0.49E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambdabar_c()- p)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S55
text:
The second error for GABYSHEV 2003 includes the systematic and the error of Lambda_c --> pbar K+ pi- decay branching fraction.


pdgid: S042S56
text:
AUBERT 2010H  reports 1.94+-0.17+-0.52E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C31
text:
LEES 2015B  reports [G(B0 --> Lambda_c()- p K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 12.5+-2.0+-1.0E-7 which we divide by our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C32
text:
LEES 2015B  reports <1.2E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambda_c()- p phi)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35E-2.


pdgid: S042Q91
text:
AUBERT 2010H  reports [G(B0 --> Sigma_c(2455)- p)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] < 1.5E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35E-2.


pdgid: S042R83
text:
PARK 2007   reports 6.4+-0.4+-1.9E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+ pi- (nonresonant))/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B39
text:
PARK 2007   reports 1.2+-0.1+-0.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2520)-- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B39
text:
GABYSHEV 2002   reports 1.63+0.64-0.58E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2520)-- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042Q84
text:
KIM 2008   reports 0.80+-0.15+-0.25E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)0 N0  ,  N0 --> p pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B26
text:
DYTMAN 2002   reports 2.2+-0.7E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)0 p pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B26
text:
PARK 2007   reports 1.4+-0.2+-0.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)0 p pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B26
text:
GABYSHEV 2002   reports 0.48+0.46-0.41E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)0 p pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B27
text:
DYTMAN 2002   reports 3.7+-1.1E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)-- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B27
text:
PARK 2007   reports 2.1+-0.2+-0.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)-- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042B27
text:
GABYSHEV 2002   reports 2.38+0.75-0.69E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)-- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042Q88
text:
AUBERT 2009AG reports 4.33+-0.82+-0.33+-1.13E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambda_c()- p K+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042Q89
text:
AUBERT 2009AG reports 1.11+-0.30+-0.09+-0.29E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)-- p K+  ,  Sigmabar_c()-- --> Lambdabar_c()- pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042C20
text:
Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.050+-0.013.


pdgid: S042Q96
text:
The reported uncertainties are statistical, systematic, and Lambdabar_{{c}}()- branching fraction uncertainty.


pdgid: S042Q96
text:
LEES 2011F  reports 3.8+-0.8+-0.2+-1.0E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambdabar_c()- Lambda K+)/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] / [B(Lambda --> p pi-)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2,B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 63.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best values B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2, B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 64.1+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S042P54
text:
LI 2019C  reports 1.16+-0.74+-0.33E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Xibar_c()- Lambda_c()+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.28+-0.32E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R78
text:
LI 2019C  reports 3.32+-0.74+-0.33E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Xibar_c()- Lambda_c()+  ,  Xibar_c()- --> Xibar+ pi- pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.28+-0.32E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R78
text:
AUBERT 2008H  reports 1.5+-1.07+-0.44E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Xibar_c()- Lambda_c()+  ,  Xibar_c()- --> Xibar+ pi- pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R78
text:
CHISTOV 2006A  reports 9.3+3.7-2.8+-3.1E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Xibar_c()- Lambda_c()+  ,  Xibar_c()- --> Xibar+ pi- pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042P55
text:
LI 2019C  reports 5.27+-1.51+-0.69E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Xibar_c()- Lambda_c()+  ,  Xibar_c()- --> pbar K+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.28+-0.32E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042A56
text:
Uses B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) based on the CHOUDHURY 2023 to estimate N(B0 Bbar0) pairs.  Omega_{{c}}(2770)0 is partially reconstructed and assumed to exclusively decay to final states  containing Omega_{{c}}()0.


pdgid: S042P77
text:
LEES 2023B searched for psi_{{DS}} in the recoil mass against Lambda and the fully  reconstructed accompanying B meson. The cited upper limit is for m(psi_{{DS}}) between 1 and  4.1 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S042P77
text:
HADJIVASILIOU 2022 searched for psi_{{DS}}, in the mass range 1 -- 3.9 GeV/c**2,  in the recoil mass against Lambda and the accompanying B meson. The cited upper limit is  for m(psi_{{DS}}) = 2.0 GeV/c**2 and is the most stringent. The least stringent limit is  <3.8E-5 at m(psi_{{DS}}) = 3.9 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S042S36
text:
Used combined Belle and Belle II data and B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) =  (48.4+-1.2)%. A signal with 2.5sigma significance, including systematic  uncertainties, is observed, corresponding to a branching fraction 3.7+2.2-1.8+-0.5E-8.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3, B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) =  5.961+-0.033E-2.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.010+-0.029E-3 and B production ratio  f(b --> B_s()0)/f(b --> B0) = 0.256+-0.013.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
This value is obtained from a profile-likelihood fit, see Fig. 9. It corresponds to an uppper limit of < 0.42E-9 at 95% C.L.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
Derived from the combined fit to CMS and LHCb data. Uncertainty includes both statistical and systematic component. Also reports B(B0 --> mu+ mu-)/B(B_s --> mu+ mu-) = 0.14+0.08-0.06.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
Uses B(B+ --> J/psi K+ --> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.01+-0.21E-5 and B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 1.94+-0.06E-5 for normalization.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
Reports also a limit of <7.4E-10 at 95% CL. Uses normalization modes B+ --> J/psi K+ --> mu+ mu- K+ and B0 --> K+ pi-.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
Reports also a limit of <9.2E-10 at 90% CL. and uses B(B+ --> J/psi K+ --> mu+ mu- K+)  = 6.0+-0.2E-5 for normalization.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
Uses B production ratio  f(bbar --> B+)/f(bbar --> B_s()0) = 3.71+-0.47 and three normalization modes.


pdgid: S042R69
text:
Uses B(B0 --> J/psi K^*(892)0) = 1.19+-0.01+-0.08E-3. The second error is the total  systematic uncertainty.


pdgid: S042C49
text:
The limt is obtained as a function of di-muon mass. A normalizing mode branching fraction value of  B(B0 --> K^*()0 mu+ mu-) = 1.6+-0.3E-7 is used.


pdgid: S042C36
text:
AAIJ 2015S  reports 2.11+-0.51+-0.15+-0.16E-8 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> pi+ pi- mu+ mu-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.3+-0.1E-3, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042SN1
text:
A reinterpretation of an old inclusive ALEPH search for b-hadron decays with large missing  energy reported in BARATE 2001E.


pdgid: S042SN1
text:
Identified by fully reconstructing a hadronic decay of the accompanying B meson and requiring no other particles in the event.


pdgid: S042R8
text:
AAIJ 2018T uses normalization modes B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.6+-0.5E-6 and B(B+ --> J/psi K+) =  1.026+-0.031E-3.


pdgid: S042Q92
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011K  reports <180E-8 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambda_c()+ mu-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35E-2.


pdgid: S042Q93
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011K  reports <520E-8 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambda_c()+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35E-2.


pdgid: S042P1
text:
AAIJ 2013AT obtains Gamma((parallel))/Gamma = 0.227+-0.004+-0.011. The relation 1 = ( Gamma(L) + Gamma((perp)) + Gamma((parallel)))/Gamma is used to obtain Gamma(L)/Gamma.


pdgid: S042P1
text:
Measured the angular and lifetime parameters for the time-dependent angular untagged decays B_d()0 --> J/psi K^*0() and B_s()0 --> J/psi phi.


pdgid: S042P1
text:
AFFOLDER 2000N measurements are based on 190 B0 candidates obtained from a data sample of 89pb**-1. The P-wave fraction is found to be 0.13+0.12-0.09+-0.06.


pdgid: S042P1
text:
JESSOP 1997 is the average over a mixture of B0 and B+ decays.  The P-wave fraction is found to be 0.16+-0.08+-0.04.


pdgid: S042A66
text:
AAIJ 2024AN value restricted to q**2< 7.0 GeV**2/c**4. Reports correlation  of -0.18 with the measurement in the region q**2> 7.0 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S042A66
text:
AAIJ 2024AN value restricted to q**2> 7.0 GeV**2/c**4. Reports correlation  of -0.18 with the measurement in the region q**2< 7.0 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S042P5
text:
AUBERT,B 2004W also measures the fraction of parity-odd transverse contribution f(perp) = 0.22+-0.05+-0.02 and the phases of the parity-even and parity-odd transverse amplitudes relative to the longitudinal amplitude.


pdgid: S042CHD
text:
BEHRENS 2000B uses high-momentum lepton tags and partially reconstructed Bbar0 --> D^*()+ pi-, rho- decays to determine the flavor of the Bmeson.


pdgid: S042CHD
text:
ALBRECHT 1994 reports r=0.194+-0.062+-0.054. We convert to chi for comparison.  Uses tagged events (lepton + pion from D^*).


pdgid: S042CHD
text:
BARTELT 1993 analysis performed using tagged events (lepton+pion from D^*).  Using dilepton events they obtain 0.157+-0.016+0.033-0.028.


pdgid: S042CHD
text:
ALBRECHT 1992L is a combined measurement employing several lepton-based techniques.  It uses all previous ARGUS data in addition to new data and therefore supersedes ALBRECHT 1987I.  A value of r = 20.6+-7.0% is directly measured.  The value can be used to measure x = DeltaM/Gamma = 0.72+-0.15 for the B_{{d}} meson. Assumes f(+-)/f(0) = 1.0+-0.05 and uses meanlife(B+-)/meanlife(B0) = (0.95+-0.14) (f(+-)/f(0)).


pdgid: S042CHD
text:
ALBRECHT 1987I is inclusive measurement with like-sign dileptons, with tagged B decays plus leptons, and one fully reconstructed event.


pdgid: S042CHD
text:
Same-sign dilepton events.  Limit assumes semileptonic BR for B+ and B0 equal.  If B0/B+- ratio <0.58, no limit exists.


pdgid: S042D
text:
Uses semileptonic decays of B0 --> D- mu+ nu_mu X and B0 --> D^(*)()- mu+ nu_mu X, where  the D mesons are reconstructed in D- --> K+ pi- pi- and D^(*)()- --> Dbar0 pi- with  Dbar0 --> K+ pi-.


pdgid: S042D
text:
Uses semileptonic decays of B0 --> D- mu+ nu_mu X where the D- mesons are reconstructed in  D- --> K+ K- pi-.


pdgid: S042D
text:
Events with a high transverse momentum lepton were removed and an inclusively reconstructed vertex was required.


pdgid: S042D
text:
HASTINGS 2003 measurement based on the time evolution of dilepton events. It also reports f(+)/f(0) = 1.01+-0.03+-0.09 and CPT violation parameters in B0-Bbar0 mixing.


pdgid: S042D
text:
ZHENG 2003 data analyzed using partially reconstructed Bbar0 --> D^*()- pi+ decay and a flavor tag based on the charge of the lepton from the accompanying B decay.


pdgid: S042D
text:
Data analyzed using partially reconstructed Bbar0 --> D^*()+ lepton- nubar decay and a combination of flavor tags from the rest of the event.


pdgid: S042D
text:
ACCIARRI 1998D combines results from lepton-lepton, lepton-Q(hem), and lepton-lepton with impact parameters.


pdgid: S042D
text:
ABREU 1997N combines results from D^*()+--Q(hem), lepton-Q(hem), pi_s()+- lepton-Q(hem), and lepton-lepton.


pdgid: S042D
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1997V combines results from lepton-lepton, lepton-Q(hem), D^*-lepton, and D^*()+--Q(hem).


pdgid: S042RZ1
text:
The first uncertainty is the uncertainty from Re(z) and the second uncertainty is from  Re(lambda/|lambda|).


pdgid: S042RZ0
text:
Measured using B0 --> J/psi K0S, J/psi K0L, D- pi+, D^*()- pi+, D^*()- rho+, and D^*()- lepton+ nu decays.


pdgid: S042IZ1
text:
Measurement uses B0/Bbar0 --> lepton+ X/lepton- X decays. Assuming DeltaGamma = 0, the result becomes Im(z) = -0.37+-0.54E-2.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
AAIJ 2015F uses semileptonic B0 decays in the inclusive final states D- mu+ and D^*()- mu+, where the D- meson decays into the K+ pi- pi- final state, and the D^*()- meson into the Dbar0(K+ pi-)pi- final state. Reports A_{{{SL}}}^d() = (-0.02+-0.19+-0.30)%, which equals to 4Re(epsilon(B0))/(1+|epsilon(B0)|**2).


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2014 uses the dimuon charge asymmetry with different impact parameters from which it reports A_{{{SL}}}^d() = -0.62+-0.42E-2.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
Uses B0 --> D^*()- X lepton+ nu_lepton and a kaon-tagged sample which yields measurement of A_{{SL}}^d() = (0.06+-0.17+0.38-0.32)%, corresponding to Delta(CP) = 1-|q/p| = 0.29+-0.84+1.88-1.61E-3.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2012AC uses B0 --> D- mu+ X and B0 --> D^*(2010)- mu+ X decays without initial state flavor tagging which yields measurement of A(SL)**d = 6.8+-4.5+-1.4E-3.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
JAFFE 2001 finds a(lepton lepton) = 0.013+-0.050+-0.005 and combines with the previous BEHRENS 2000B independent measurement.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2011U uses the dimuon charge asymmetry with different impact parameters from which it reports A_{{SL}}^d() = -1.2+-5.2E-3.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
BARATE 2001D measured by investigating time-dependent asymmetries in semileptonic and fully inclusive B_{{d}}()0 decays.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
Data analyzed using the time-dependent asymmetry of inclusive B0 decay. The production flavor of B0 mesons is determined using both the jet charge and the charge of secondary vertex in the opposite hemisphere.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1997U assumes CPT and is based on measuring the charge asymmetry in a sample of B0 decays defined by lepton and Q(hem) tags. If CPT is not invoked, Re(epsilon_{{B}}) = -0.006+-0.010+-0.006 is found.  The indirect CPT violation parameter is determined to Im(delta B) = -0.020+-0.016+-0.006.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
BARTELT 1993 finds a(lepton lepton) = 0.031+-0.096+-0.032 which corresponds to |a(lepton lepton)|<0.18, which  yields the above  |Re(epsilon(B0))/(1+|epsilon(B0)|**2)|.


pdgid: S042CQ9
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B0 --> K0 pi+ pi- decays and the first of two equivalent solutions is used.


pdgid: S042AC3
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B0 --> K0 pi+ pi- decays and the first of two consistent solutions that may be preferred.


pdgid: S042CPJ
text:
AAIJ 2020L reports the measurements of C = -0.059+-0.092+-0.020 and DeltaC =  -0.031+-0.092+-0.016 such that C(D^*(2010)- D+) = C - DeltaC.


pdgid: S042CPJ
text:
ROHRKEN 2012 reports the measurements of C = -0.01+-0.11+-0.04 and DeltaC = 0.12+-0.11+-0.03 such that C(D^*(2010)- D+) = C - DeltaC .


pdgid: S042SPJ
text:
AAIJ 2020L reports the measurements of S = -0.861+-0.077+-0.019 and DeltaS =  0.019+-0.075+-0.012 such that S(D^*(2010)- D+) = S - DeltaS.


pdgid: S042SPJ
text:
ROHRKEN 2012 reports the measurements of S = -0.78+-0.15+-0.05 and DeltaS = -0.13+-0.15+-0.04 such that S(D^*(2010)+ D-) = S - DeltaS.


pdgid: S042CPK
text:
AAIJ 2020L reports the measurements of C = -0.059+-0.092+-0.020 and DeltaC =  -0.031+-0.092+-0.016 such that C(D^*(2010)+ D-) = C + DeltaC.


pdgid: S042CPK
text:
ROHRKEN 2012 reports the measurements of C = -0.01+-0.11+-0.04 and DeltaC = 0.12+-0.11+-0.03 such that C(D^*(2010)+ D-) = C + DeltaC .


pdgid: S042SPK
text:
AAIJ 2020L reports the measurements of S = -0.861+-0.077+-0.019 and DeltaS =  0.019+-0.075+-0.012 such that S(D^*(2010)+ D-) = S + DeltaS.


pdgid: S042SPK
text:
ROHRKEN 2012 reports the measurements of S = -0.78+-0.15+-0.05 and DeltaS = -0.13+-0.15+-0.04 such that S(D^*(2010)+ D-) = S + DeltaS.


pdgid: S042LD1
text:
Measured partially reconstructed candidates when one D0 meson is not excplicitely reconstructed. Analysis does not separate CP-even and CP-odd component.


pdgid: S042LD1
text:
AUBERT 2003Q reports |lambda|=0.75+-0.19+-0.02 and Im(lambda)=0.05+-0.29+-0.10. We convert them to S and C parameters taking into account correlations.


pdgid: S042CD+
text:
Measured partially reconstructed candidates when one D0 meson is not excplicitely reconstructed. Extracted under assumption of equal C(+) and C(-).


pdgid: S042SD+
text:
Measured partially reconstructed candidates when one D0 meson is not excplicitely reconstructed. Analysis does not separate CP-even and CP-odd component. Value is obtained from S = -0.34+-0.12+-0.05 using S = S(+) (1 - 2 R((perp))) with R((perp)) = 0.158+-0.029.


pdgid: S042SD-
text:
KRONENBITTER 2012 reported S(-) = 1.52+-0.62+-0.12. A minus sign results from a  different convention, see AUBERT 2009C.


pdgid: S042SDS
text:
This value includes an unknown CP dilution factor D due to possible contributions from intermediate resonances and different partial waves.


pdgid: S042CPR
text:
Time-dependent CP violation is measured in the B0 --> J/psi rho0 and was used to limit the size of penguin amplitude contributions to phi_{{s}} in B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays to be between  [-1.05degree, 1.18degree] at 95% confidence level.


pdgid: S042CDH
text:
BABAR and BELLE combined analysis uses CP-eigenstate decay modes D0 --> K+ K-, K0S pi0, K0S omega,  and h0 = pi0, eta, omega.


pdgid: S042CKP
text:
The measurement is using BELL II data reported in ADACHI 2024. The combination with  ADACHI 2023E is also reported.


pdgid: S042CEK
text:
Asymmetries are measured using B0 --> eta^' K0S decays, with eta^' --> eta ( --> gamma gamma ) pi+ pi- and  eta^' --> rho ( --> pi+ pi- ) gamma.


pdgid: S042CEK
text:
The mixing-induced CP violation is reported with a significance of more than 5 standard deviations in this b --> s penguin dominated mode.


pdgid: S042CF1
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B0 --> K0S K+ K- decays and the first of four consistent solutions that may be preferred.


pdgid: S042SX2
text:
This measurement is performed on all the isobar components, excluding phi K0S and f_0(980) K0S. Note that the nonresonant component is not a CP eigenstate.


pdgid: S042CK0
text:
Requires M (K pi pi) < 1.8 GeV/c**2, 0.6 GeV/c**2 < mass(pi+ pi-) < 0.9 GeV/c**2, mass(K pi) < 0.845 GeV/c**2 or mass(K pi) > 0.945 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S042CKR
text:
Reports value of A(eff) which is equal to -C,  and includes the non-resonant pi+ pi- contribution in the rho0 region.


pdgid: S042SPI
text:
An isospin analysis using other BELLE measurements, disfavors the region of 23.8degree< phi_{{2}}< 66.8degree at 68% CL.


pdgid: S042CX6
text:
Quotes A(pi0 pi0) = -0.14+-0.46+-0.07 (correction published May 22, 2024)  which is equal to -C(pi0 pi0).


pdgid: S042CJ1
text:
The measurement is obtained when sin( 2beta) is fixed to 0.726 and the sign of cos( 2beta) is positive with 86% confidence level.


pdgid: S042CJ2
text:
Analyzes joint data sample of Belle and BaBar using Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi-;  the second error combines experimental systematic uncertainty and the Dalitz plot model uncertainty.


pdgid: S042CJ2
text:
AUBERT 2007BH evaluates the likelihoods for the positive and negative solutions assuming sin(2 beta(eff)) = 0.678. It quotes L(+) / (L(+)+ L(-)) = 0.86 corresponding to a likelihood ratio of L(+)/L(-) = 6.14 in favor of the positive solution.


pdgid: S042CJ2
text:
KROKOVNY 2006 evaluates the likelihoods for the positive and negative solutions assuming sin(2 beta(eff)) = 0.689. It quotes L(+) / (L(+)+ L(-)) = 0.983 corresponding to a likelihood ratio of L(+)/L(-) = 57.8 in favor of the positive solution.


pdgid: S042LD3
text:
Combines the results from fully reconstructed and partially reconstructed D^*() pi events by taking weighted averages. Assumes that systematic errors from physics parameters and fit biases in the two measurements are 100% correlated.


pdgid: S042LD5
text:
Combines the results from fully reconstructed and partially reconstructed D() pi events by taking weighted averages. Assumes that systematic errors from physics parameters and fit biases in the two measurements are 100% correlated.


pdgid: S042A06
text:
Measured in the simultaneous analysis of B0 --> D-+ pi+- decays. AAIJ 2018Z reports a  statistical (systematic) correlation of 0.6 (-0.41) with the measured value of S(-)(B0 --> D+ pi-).


pdgid: S042A07
text:
Measured in the simultaneous analysis of B0 --> D-+ pi+- decays. AAIJ 2018Z reports a  statistical (systematic) correlation of 0.6 (-0.41) with the measured value of S(+)(B0 --> D- pi+).


pdgid: S042CCC
text:
A combination of this Run 2 result with the Run 1 result from AAIJ 2017BN is reported with a  correlation coefficient of 0.40.


pdgid: S042CCC
text:
Measurement based on B0 --> J/psi K0S, B0 --> psi(2S) K0S, B0 --> J/psi K0L, and B0 --> chi_c1(1P) K0S decays.


pdgid: S042CCC
text:
Measurement based on B0 --> J/psi K0S, B0 --> psi(2S) K0S with J/psi --> mu+ mu-,  J/psi --> e+ e- and psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-.


pdgid: S042CCC
text:
AAIJ 2024 provides the correlation coefficient rho=0.441 between the uncertainties of  sin(2beta) and C(c cbar K^(*)()0) (B0 --> c cbar K^(*)()0) measurements.


pdgid: S042CCC
text:
AAIJ 2017BN provides the correlation coefficient rho=0.42 between the uncertainties of  S(B0 --> c cbar K^(*)()0)(B0 --> c cbar K^(*)()0) and C(c cbar K^(*)()0) (B0 --> c cbar K^(*)()0)  measurements.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
SATO 2012 uses 121 fb**-1 data collected on Y(5S) resonance. Uses the ''B-pi tagging'' where B pi+ and B pi- tagged J/psi K0S events are compared.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
Measurement in which the J/psi decays to hadrons or to muons that do not satisfy the standard identification criteria.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
AFFOLDER 2000C uses about 400 B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S events.  The production flavor of B0 was determined using three tagging algorithms: a same-side tag, a jet-charge tag, and a soft-lepton tag.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
BARATE 2000Q uses 23 candidates for B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S decays. A combination of jet-charge, vertex-charge, and same-side tagging techniques were used to determine the B0 production flavor.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1998Z uses 24 candidates for B_d()0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S decay. A combination of jet-charge and vertex-charge techniques were used to tag the B_{{d}}()0 production flavor.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
AAIJ 2024 provides the correlation coefficient rho = 0.441 between the uncertainties of  sin(2beta) and C(c cbar K^(*)()0) (B0 --> c cbar K^(*)()0) measurements.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
AAIJ 2017BN provides the correlation coefficient rho = 0.42 between the uncertainties of  sin(2beta) and cos(2beta) measurements.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
ABE 1998U uses 198+-17 B_d()0 --> J/psi(1S) K0 events. The production flavor of B0 was determined using the same side tagging technique.


pdgid: S042CJK
text:
AAIJ 2024 provides the correlation coefficient rho = 0.441 between the uncertainties of  C(J/psi(nS) K0) (B0 --> J/psi(nS) K0) and S(J/psi(nS) K0) (B0 --> J/psi(nS) K0) measurements.


pdgid: S042CJK
text:
AAIJ 2017BN provides the correlation coefficient rho = 0.42 between the uncertainties of  S(J/psi(nS) K0) (B0 --> J/psi(nS) K0) and C(J/psi(nS) K0) (B0 --> J/psi(nS) K0) measurements.


pdgid: S042CJK
text:
AAIJ 2015N uses 41,560 flavor-tagged B_d() --> J/psi K0S events from 3 fb**-1 of integrated luminosity. Provides the correlation coefficient rho = 0.483 between the statistical uncertainties of and measurements.


pdgid: S042CJK
text:
AAIJ 2013K uses 8200 flavor-tagged B_d --> J/psi KS events from 1 fb**-1 of integrated luminosity. Provides the correlation coefficient rho = 0.42 between the statistical uncertainties of S(J/psi(nS) K0) (B0 --> J/psi(nS) K0) and C(J/psi(nS) K0) (B0 --> J/psi(nS) K0) measurements.


pdgid: S042SJK
text:
SATO 2012 uses 121 fb**-1 data collected at Upsilon(5S) resonance.  Uses the ''B-pi tagging'' where B pi+ and B pi- tagged J/psi K0S events are compared.


pdgid: S042SJS
text:
This S(J/psi K^*()0) value has been corrected for the dilution of the sin(DeltaM Deltat) coefficient of the CP asymmetry by a factor of 1-R((perp)), which arises from the mixture of CP-even and CP-odd B decay amplitudes.


pdgid: S042BFK
text:
Measured using the CP-violation phase difference Deltaphi_{{00}}() between the B and Bbar decay amplitude.


pdgid: S042BGA
text:
Uses fully reconstructed B0 --> D^(*)()+- pi-+ and D+- rho-+ decays and some theoretical assumptions.


pdgid: S042BGA
text:
Uses a time dependent CP violation measurement in B0 --> D-+ pi+- decays with external input  and some theoretical assumptions.


pdgid: S042BGA
text:
Combines the results from fully reconstructed and partially reconstructed D^(*)() pi events by taking weighted averages. Assumes that systematic errors from physics parameters and fit biases in the two measurements are 100% correlated.


pdgid: S042BGA
text:
Uses fully reconstructed B0 --> D^(*)()+- pi-+  decays and some theoretical assumptions, such as the SU(3) symmetry relation.


pdgid: S042BGA
text:
Combining this measurement with the results from AUBERT 2004V for fully reconstructed B0 --> D^(*)()+- pi-+ and some theoretical assumptions, such as the SU(3) symmetry relation.


pdgid: S042BG0
text:
Used a time-dependent Dalitz-plot analysis of B0 --> D()-+ K0 pi()+- assuming the ratio  of the b --> u and b --> c decay amplitudes to be 0.3.


pdgid: S042ALP
text:
Obtained using the time dependent analysis of B0 --> a_1(1260)+- pi-+ and branching fraction measurements of B --> a_1(1260) K and  B --> K_1 pi. Uses SU(3) flavor relations.


pdgid: S042ALP
text:
The angle alpha(eff) is obtained using the measured CP parameters of B0 --> a_1(1260)+- pi-+ and choosing one of the four solutions that is compatible with the result of SM-based fits.


pdgid: S042ALP
text:
Obtained using isospin relation and selecting a solution closest to the CKM best fit average; the 90% CL allowed interval is 59degrees<phi(2) (==alpha) < 115degrees.


pdgid: S042ALP
text:
Obtained using isospin relation and selecting a solution closest to the CKM best fit average; 90% CL allowed interval is 79degrees < alpha  < 123degrees.


pdgid: S042ALP
text:
Obtained from the measured CP parameters of the longitudinal polarization by selecting the solution closest to the CKM best fit central value of alpha = 95degrees - 98degrees.


pdgid: S042XP
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- , K0S K+ K- decays coming from B0 --> D K^*(892)0  modes. The second error is the systematic contribution from the D decay strong-phase inputs and  from the experimental systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: S042AR
text:
Measurement is performed with K+ pi- masses within 50 MeV of the K^*()0 mass and an  absolute value of the cosine of the K^*()0 helicity angle greater than 0.4. Angle gamma  is required to satisfy 0 < gamma < 180 degrees.


pdgid: S042PBH
text:
The last uncertainty is due to uncertainties of B(B0 --> J/psi K^*()0) and B(J/psi --> e+ e-) branching fraction measurements.


pdgid: S042PBF
text:
Uses B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0) = 0.928+-0.013+-0.037E-3 for normalisation and mu+ mu- as a lepton pair. Measured in 1.1 < q**2 < 6.0 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S042A34
text:
Measured from the ratio of K0S mu+ mu-  and K0S e+ e-. Measurements in other q**2 bins  are also reported.


pdgid: S042PBK
text:
Uses B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0) = 0.928+-0.013+-0.037E-3 for normalisation and mu+ mu- as a lepton pair.


pdgid: S042A41
text:
The reported value is converted from the measured dB/dq^2 = 2.6+-0.6+-0.1E-8   (GeV**2/c**4)**-1 by multiplying by the Deltaq^2 = 4.9 GeV**2/c**4  range.


pdgid: S042A03
text:
Measured the differential branching fraction and angular  moments of the decay B0 --> K+ pi- mu+ mu- in  the K+ pi- invariant mass range 1330 < m(K+ pi-) < 1530 MeV/c**2.


pdgid: S042A03
text:
The reported value is converted from the measured dB/dq^2 = 0.82+-0.09+-0.063E-8  (GeV**2/c**4)**-1 by multiplying by the Deltaq^2 = 4.9 GeV**2/c**4  range.


pdgid: S042PAX
text:
AAIJ 2017BF uses B0 --> J/psi K^*()0 decays with B0 transverse momenta pT and  rapidities y in the region of 0 < pT < 30 GeV/c and 2.1 < y < 4.5.


pdgid: S042PAX
text:
Based on time-dependent analysis of B0 --> J/psi K^*()0 decay  in kinematic range pT  > 10 GeV/c and |eta| < 2.5.


pdgid: S042PAX
text:
Based on time-dependent analysis of B0 --> J/psi K^*()0 and B0 --> D- pi+ in kinematic range 4 < pT < 30 GeV/c and 2.5 <eta < 4.5.


pdgid: S042A52
text:
ADACHI 2023H measurement is based on the angular asymmetries of B0 --> D^*()- lepton+ nu_lepton  decays using explicit reconstruction of the B tag. Other asymmetries from Delta(S(3)), Delta(S(5)), Delta(S(7)), and Delta(S(9))  are also reported.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
LEES 2017B measurement is obtained from semileptonic decays to electrons. The result is  averaged over B+- and B0 mesons, assuming lepton universality.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
URQUIJO 2007 report a measurement of (10.07+-0.18+-0.21)% for the partial branching fraction of B --> e nu_e X_c decay with electron energy above 0.6 GeV. We converted the result to B --> e nu_e X branching fraction.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
Uses charge and angular correlations in Upsilon(4S) events with a high-momentum lepton and an additional electron.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
ALBRECHT 1993H analysis performed using tagged semileptonic decays of the B. This technique is almost model independent for the lepton branching ratio.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
The semileptonic branching ratio, |V_cb| and other heavy-quark parameters are determined from a simultaneous fit to moments of the hadronic-mass and lepton-energy distribution.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
Uses the high-momentum lepton tag method.  They also report |V(c b)| = 0.0423+-0.0007(exp) +-0.0020(theo.).


pdgid: S049S45
text:
Uses the high-momentum lepton tag method.  ABE 2002Y also reports |V(c b)| = 0.0408+-0.0010(exp) +-0.0025(theo.). The second error is due to uncertainties of theoretical inputs.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
BARISH 1996B analysis performed using tagged semileptonic decays of the B.  This technique is almost model independent for the lepton branching ratio.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
HENDERSON 1992 measurement employs e and mu.  The systematic error contains 0.004 in quadrature from model dependence. The authors average a variation of the Isgur, Scora, Grinstein, and Wise model with that of the Altarelli-Cabibbo-Corbo-Maiani-Martinelli model for semileptonic decays to correct the acceptance.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
YANAGISAWA 1991 also measures an average semileptonic branching ratio at the Upsilon(5S) of 9.6 -- 10.5% depending on assumptions about the relative production of different B meson species.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
ALBRECHT 1990H uses the model of ALTARELLI 1982 to correct over all lepton momenta.  0.099+-0.006 is obtained using ISGUR 1989B.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
ALBRECHT 1990H uses the model of ALTARELLI 1982 to correct over all lepton momenta.  0.097+-0.006 is obtained using ISGUR 1989B.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
Using data above p(e) = 2.4 GeV, WACHS 1989 determine CS(B --> e nu up)/CS(B --> e nu charm) < 0.065 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S049R17
text:
BARISH 1995 use B(D0 --> K- pi+) = (3.91+-0.08+-0.17)%, B(D^*()+ --> D0 pi+) = (68.1+-1.0+-1.3)%, B(D^*()0 --> D0 pi0) = (63.6+-2.3+-3.3)%.


pdgid: S049R49
text:
This is the lepton-flavor universality ratio R(e mu) for the B+ --> Dbar^*()0 lepton+ nu_lepton  and B0 --> D^*()- lepton+ nu_lepton average.


pdgid: S049R96
text:
ALBRECHT 1993 assumes the GISW model to correct for unseen modes.  Using the BHKT model, the result becomes 0.023+-0.006+-0.004.  Assumes B(D^*()+ --> D0 pi+) = 68.1%, B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.65%, B(D0 --> K- pi+ pi- pi+) = 7.5%.  We have taken their average e and mu value.


pdgid: S049R96
text:
BARISH 1995 use B(D0 --> K- pi+) = (3.91+-0.08+-0.17)%, assume all nonresonant channels are zero, and use GISW model for relative abundances of D^** states.


pdgid: S049R25
text:
BUSKULIC 1997B assumes B(D_1(2420) --> D^* pi) = 1, B(D_1(2420) --> D^* pi+-) = 2/3, and B(b --> B) = 0.378+-0.022.


pdgid: S049R25
text:
BUSKULIC 1995B reports f(B) * B(B --> Dbar_1(2420)0 lepton+ nu_lepton anything) * B(Dbar_1(2420)0 --> Dbar^*(2010)- pi+) = (2.04+-0.58+-0.34)10**-3, where f(B) is the production fraction for a single B charge state.


pdgid: S049R34
text:
Assumes no contribution from B_{{s}} and bbaryons. Further assumes contributions from single pion (D pi and D^* pi) states only, allowing isospin conservation to relate the relative pi0 and pi+ rates.


pdgid: S049R34
text:
BUSKULIC 1997B assumes B(b --> B) = 0.378+-0.022 and uses isospin invariance by assuming that all observed D0 pi+, D^*()0 pi+, D+ pi-, and D^*()+ pi- are from D^** states. A correction has been applied to account for the production of B_{{s}}()0 and Lambda_{{b}}()0.


pdgid: S049R26
text:
A revised number based on BUSKULIC 1997B which assumes B(D_2^*(2460) --> D^* pi+-) = 0.20 and B(b --> B) = 0.378+-0.022.


pdgid: S049R26
text:
BUSKULIC 1995B reports f(B) * B(B --> Dbar_2^*(2460)0 lepton+ nu_lepton anything) * B(Dbar_2^*(2460)0 --> Dbar^*(2010)- pi+) <=0.81E-3 at CL=95%, where f(B) is the production fraction for a single B charge state.


pdgid: S049R27
text:
BUSKULIC 1995B reports f(B) * B(B --> Dbar^*(2010)- pi+ lepton+ nu_lepton anything) = (3.7+-1.0+-0.7)10**-3.  Above value assumes f(B) = 0.37+-0.03.


pdgid: S049S75
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <0.012 from a measurement of [G(B --> D_s()- lepton+ nu_lepton anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S049S76
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <0.008 from a measurement of [G(B --> D_s()- lepton+ nu_lepton K+ anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S049S77
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E  reports <0.012 from a measurement of [G(B --> D_s()- lepton+ nu_lepton K0 anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S049S96
text:
The measurement is obtained from semileptonic decays to electrons B --> X e nu, and using a  theoretical model (GAMBINO 2007, GAMBINO 2011) to predict the contribution from B --> X_u e nu. The  result is averaged over B+- and B0 mesons, assuming lepton universality.


pdgid: S049S96
text:
Obtained from a combined fit to the moments of observed spectra in inclusive B --> X_c() lepton+ nu_lepton decay.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Measures several partial branching fractions in different phase space regions. The most inclusive  result of the full branching fraction is obtained in the region for lepton energy in B rest  frame E(lepton)*** > 1 GeV, where the measured partial branching fraction is  DeltaB = 1.59+-0.07+-0.16E-3. The acceptance in that region is reported to be 0.86.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Obtained from the partial rate DeltaB = 1.554+-0.082+0.095-0.086E-3 for the electron  momentum interval of 0.8 -- 2.7 GeV/c based on GGOU1 method (X_c lepton nu, mass(c)  constraint fit of SF parameters).


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Measures several partial branching fractions in different phase space regions. The most precise result on the full branching fraction is obtained in the region for lepton momentum in B rest frame p(lepton)*** > 1 GeV/c, where the measured partial  branching fraction is DeltaB = 1.80+-0.13+-0.15E-3. The acceptance in that region is reported in a private communication by the Authors to be 0.894. The corresponding |V(ub)| from the BLNP method is 4.28+-0.15+-0.18+-0.19E-3, where the last uncertainty comes from theoretical prediction.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Determined from the partial rate DeltaB = 4.41+-0.42+-0.42E-4 measured for electron energy > 2 GeV and hadronic mass squared < 3.5 GeV**2, and calculated acceptance 0.174 in that region. The V_(ub) is measured as 4.41+-0.30+0.65-0.47+-0.28E-3.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Uses electrons in the momentum interval 1.9 -- 2.6 GeV/c in the center-of-mass frame. The V_(ub) is found to be 5.08+-0.47+0.49-0.48E-3.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
BORNHEIM 2002 uses the observed yield of leptons from semileptonic B decays in the end-point momentum interval 2.2 -- 2.6 GeV/c with recent CLEO-2 data on B --> X_s gamma. The V_(ub) is found to be 4.08+-0.34+-0.53E-3.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Measurement requires lepton energy E(lepton)*** > 1 GeV in the B rest frame.  It is a part of the inclusive and exclusive |V(ub)| determination.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Uses a multivariate analysis method and requires lepton momentum in the B rest frame,  p(lepton)***> 1.0 GeV/c.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Measures several partial branching fractions in different phase space regions. The most precise result  is obtained in the region for hadronic mass M(X)< 1.55 GeV/c**2, and is  DeltaB = 1.18+-0.09+-0.07E-3. The corresponding |V_(ub)| from the BLNP  method is 4.27+-0.16+-0.13+-0.30E-3, where the last uncertainty comes from the theoretical prediction of the partial rate in the given phase-space region.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Obtained from the partial rate DeltaB = 0.572+-0.041+-0.065E-3 for the electron momentum interval of 2.0 -- 2.6 GeV/c based on BLNP method.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Used BaBar measurement of Semileptonic branching fraction B(B --> X lepton nu_lepton) = (10.87+-0.18+-0.30)% to convert the ratio of rates to branching fraction.


pdgid: S049S11
text:
BARTELT 1993B (CLEO II) measures an excess of 107+-15+-11 leptons in the lepton momentum interval 2.3 -- 2.6 GeV/c which is attributed to b --> u lepton nu_lepton.  This corresponds to a model-dependent partial branching ratio DeltaB(u b) between 1.15+-0.16+-0.15E-4, as evaluated using the KS model (KOERNER 1988), and 1.54+-0.22+-0.20E-4 using the ACCMM model (ARTUSO 1993).  The corresponding values of |V(u b)|/|V(c b)| are 0.056+-0.006 and 0.076+-0.008, respectively.


pdgid: S049S11
text:
ALBRECHT 1991C result supersedes ALBRECHT 1990. Two events are fully reconstructed providing evidence for the b --> u transition.  Using the model of ALTARELLI 1982, they obtain |V(u b)/V(c b)| = 0.11+-0.012 from 77 leptons in the 2.3 -- 2.6 GeV momentum range.


pdgid: S049S11
text:
ALBRECHT 1990 observes 41+-10 excess e and mu (lepton) events in the momentum interval p = 2.3-2.6 GeV signaling the presence of the b --> u transition. The events correspond to a model-dependent measurement of |V(u b)/V(c b)| = 0.10+-0.01.


pdgid: S049S11
text:
FULTON 1990 observe 76+-20 excess e and mu (lepton) events in the momentum interval p = 2.4-2.6 GeV signaling the presence of the b --> u transition. The average branching ratio, 1.8+-0.4+-0.3E-4, corresponds to a model-dependent measurement of approximately |V(u b)/V(c b)| = 0.1 using B(b --> c lepton nu) = 10.2+-0.2+-0.7%.


pdgid: S049S11
text:
The quoted possible limits range from 0.018 to 0.04 for the ratio, depending on which model or momentum range is chosen.  We select the most conservative limit they have calculated.  This corresponds to a limit on |V(u b)|/|V(c b)| < 0.20.  While the endpoint technique employed is more robust than their previous results in CHEN 1984, these results do not provide a numerical improvement in the limit.


pdgid: S049R09
text:
The correlation of 53% with B(B --> X_u mu+ nu_mu)(letpon energy in B rest frame    E(mu+)*** > 1 GeV) is reported.


pdgid: S049R44
text:
The correlation of 53% with B(B --> X_u e+ nu_e)(letpon energy in B rest frame  E(e+)*** > 1 GeV) is reported.


pdgid: S049R36
text:
The tag-side B meson is reconstructed in a semileptonic decay mode and the signal-side tau  is reconstructed in a purely leptonic decay. The Belle combination of HUSCHLE 2015 and  CARIA 2020 yields R(D) =32.6+-3.4E-2.


pdgid: S049R36
text:
Uses tau+ --> e+ nu_e nubar_tau and tau+ --> mu+ nu_mu nubar_tau and e+ or mu+ as lepton+. Obtained from simultaneous fit to B+ and B0 assuming isospin symmetry.


pdgid: S049R37
text:
Uses leptonic tau decays and a fully reconstructed B meson in hadronic final states as a  tag on the recoil side.


pdgid: S049R37
text:
Uses tau+ --> mu+ nu_mu nubar_tau and mu+ as lepton+. The measurement combines fully  reconstructed D^*()+ sample with sample where only D0 from D^* decays is reconstructed.


pdgid: S049R37
text:
The tag-side B meson is reconstructed in a semileptonic decay mode and the signal-side tau  is reconstructed in a purely leptonic decay. The Belle combination of HUSCHLE 2015,  HIROSE 2017, and CARIA 2020 yields R(D^*) = 0.238+-0.018.


pdgid: S049R37
text:
Uses tau+ --> e+ nu_e nubar_tau and tau+ --> mu+ nu_mu nubar_tau and e+ or mu+ as lepton+. Obtained from simultaneous fit to B+ and B0 assuming isospin symmetry. Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.


pdgid: S049S24
text:
GIBBONS 1997B from charm counting using B(D_s()+ --> phi pi) = 0.036+-0.009 and B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.044+-0.006.


pdgid: S049S24
text:
From the difference between K- and K+ widths. ALAM 1987B measurement relies on lepton-kaon correlations. It does not consider the possibility of B Bbar mixing. We have thus removed it from the average.


pdgid: S049S17
text:
GIBBONS 1997B  reports [G(B --> D+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] = 0.0216+-0.0008+-0.00082 which we divide by our best value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.38+-0.16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S17
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports [G(B --> D+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] = 0.0226+-0.0030+-0.0018 which we divide by our best value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.38+-0.16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S17
text:
ALBRECHT 1991H  reports [G(B --> D+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] = 0.0209+-0.0027+-0.0040 which we divide by our best value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.38+-0.16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S17
text:
BORTOLETTO 1987   reports [G(B --> D+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] = 0.019+-0.004+-0.002 which we divide by our best value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.38+-0.16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S8
text:
GIBBONS 1997B  reports [G(B --> D0/Dbar0 anything)/G(total)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = 0.0251+-0.0006+-0.00075 which we divide by our best value B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.945+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S8
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992   reports [G(B --> D0/Dbar0 anything)/G(total)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = 0.0233+-0.0012+-0.0014 which we divide by our best value B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.945+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S8
text:
ALBRECHT 1991H  reports [G(B --> D0/Dbar0 anything)/G(total)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = 0.0194+-0.0015+-0.0025 which we divide by our best value B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.945+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S8
text:
BORTOLETTO 1987   reports [G(B --> D0/Dbar0 anything)/G(total)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = 0.0210+-0.0015+-0.0021 which we divide by our best value B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.945+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S8
text:
GREEN 1983   reports [G(B --> D0/Dbar0 anything)/G(total)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = 0.024+-0.006+-0.004 which we divide by our best value B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.945+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S12
text:
GIBBONS 1997B reports B(B --> D^*(2010)+ anything) = 0.239+-0.015+-0.014+-0.009 using CLEO measured D and D^* branching fractions.  We rescale to our PDG 1996 values of D and D^* branching ratios. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S12
text:
ALBRECHT 1996D reports B(B --> D^*(2010)+ anything) 0.196+-0.019 using CLEO measured B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.681+-0.01+-0.013, B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 0.0401+-0.0014, B(D0 --> K- pi+ pi+ pi-) = 0.081+-0.005., We rescale to our PDG 1996 values of D and D^* branching ratios. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S12
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 reports B(B --> D^*(2010)+ anything) = 0.25+-0.03+-0.04 using MARKII B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06 and B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 0.042+-0.008. We rescale to our PDG 1996 values of D and D^* branching ratios. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S12
text:
ALBRECHT 1991H  reports 0.348+-0.060+-0.035 from a measurement of [G(B --> D^*(2010)+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.55+-0.04, which we rescale to our best value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S12
text:
BORTOLETTO 1987 uses old MARK III (BALTRUSAITIS 1986E) branching ratios B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 0.056+-0.004+-0.003 and also assumes B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.60+0.08-0.15.  The product branching ratio for B(B --> D^*(2010)+) B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) is 0.13+-0.02+-0.012. Superseded by BORTOLETTO 1992.


pdgid: S049S12
text:
V-A momentum spectrum used to extrapolate below p = 1 GeV.  We correct the value assuming B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 0.042+-0.006 and B(D^*()+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.6+0.08-0.15. The product branching fraction is B(B --> D^*()+ X).B(D^*()+ --> pi+ D0).B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 68+-15+-9E-4.


pdgid: S049R35
text:
GIBBONS 1997B reports B(B --> D^*(2007)0 anything) 0.247+-0.012+-0.018+-0.018 using CLEO measured D and D^* branching fractions.  We rescale to our PDG 1996 values of D and D^* branching ratios. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S14
text:
ARTUSO 2005B  reports 0.0905+-0.0025+-0.0140 from a measurement of [G(B --> D_s()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.4+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S14
text:
AUBERT 2002G  reports [G(B --> D_s()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.00393+-0.00007+-0.00021 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S14
text:
ALBRECHT 1992G  reports [G(B --> D_s()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.00292+-0.00039+-0.00031 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S14
text:
BORTOLETTO 1990   reports [G(B --> D_s()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.00306+-0.00047 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S14
text:
HAAS 1986   reports [G(B --> D_s()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.0038+-0.0010 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S14
text:
GIBAUT 1996   reports 0.1211+-0.0039+-0.0088 from a measurement of [G(B --> D_s()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S14
text:
ALBRECHT 1987H  reports [G(B --> D_s()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.0042+-0.0009+-0.0006 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049R63
text:
AUBERT 2002G  reports [G(B --> D_s^*()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.00284+-0.00029+-0.00025 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049R73
text:
The product branching ratio for B(B --> Dbar D_s0(2317)+)xB(D_s0(2317)+ --> D_s pi0) is measured to be 8.5+2.1-1.9+-2.6E-4.


pdgid: S049R74
text:
The product branching ratio for B(B --> Dbar D_sJ(2457)+)xB(D_sJ(2457)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0 , D_s+ gamma) are measured to be 17.8+4.5-3.9+-5.3E-4 and 6.7+1.3-1.2+-2.0E-4, respectively.


pdgid: S049S36
text:
BARATE 1998Q measures B(B --> D_s^(*) Dbar^(*)) = 0.056+0.021-0.015+0.009-0.008+0.019, where the third error results from the uncertainty on the different Dbranching ratios and is dominated by the uncertainty on B(D_s+ --> phi pi+). We divide B(B --> D_s^(*) Dbar^(*)) by our best value of B(B --> D_s anything)= 0.1+-0.025.


pdgid: S049S54
text:
LESIAK 1992 set a limit on the inclusive process B(b --> s gamma) <2.8E-3 at 90% CL for the range of masses of 892 -- 2045 MeV, independent of assumptions about s-quark hadronization.


pdgid: S049S91
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B  reports <4.8E-4 from a measurement of [G(B --> D_s+ pi- ,  D_s^*()+ pi- ,  D_s+ rho- , D_s^*()+ rho- , D_s+ pi0 , D_s^*()+ pi0 , D_s+ eta , D_s^*()+ eta , D_s+ rho0 , D_s^*()+ rho0 , D_s+ omega , D_s^*()+ omega)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S049S91
text:
This branching ratio limit provides a model-dependent upper limit |V(u b)|/|V(c b)| <0.16 at CL=90%.


pdgid: S049R32
text:
Assuming factorization, the decay constant f(D_{{s1}}()+) is at least a factor of 2.5 times smaller than f(D_{{s}}()+).


pdgid: S049S7
text:
AUBERT 2003F also reports the momentum distribution and helicity of J/psi --> lepton+ lepton- in the Upsilon(4S) center-of-mass frame.


pdgid: S049S7
text:
MASCHMANN 1990   reports 1.12+-0.33+-0.25E-2 from a measurement of [G(B --> J/psi(1S) anything)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S7
text:
ALBRECHT 1987D  reports 1.07+-0.16+-0.22E-2 from a measurement of [G(B --> J/psi(1S) anything)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S7
text:
ALAM 1986   reports 1.09+-0.16+-0.21E-2 from a measurement of [G(B --> J/psi(1S) anything)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 0.074+-0.012, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S7
text:
They measure J/psi(1S) --> e+ e- and mu+ mu- and use PDG 1994 values for the branching fractions.  The rescaling is the same for either mode so we use e+ e-.


pdgid: S049S7
text:
BALEST 1995B  reports 1.12+-0.04+-0.06E-2 from a measurement of [G(B --> J/psi(1S) anything)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.0599+-0.0025, which we rescale to our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S7
text:
Statistical and systematic errors were added in quadrature. ALBRECHT 1985H also report a CL = 90% limit of 0.007 for B --> J/psi(1S) + X where mass(X) <1 GeV.


pdgid: S049R23
text:
Also reports the measurement of J/psi --> lepton+ lepton- polarization produced directly from B decay.


pdgid: S049R23
text:
BALEST 1995B assume PDG 1994 values for sub mode branching ratios.  J/psi(1S) mesons are reconstructed in J/psi(1S) --> e+ e- and J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-. The B --> J/psi(1S) X branching ratio contains J/psi(1S) mesons directly from B decays and also from feeddown through psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S), chi_c1(1P) --> J/psi(1S), or chi_c2(1P) --> J/psi(1S).  Using the measured inclusive rates, BALEST 1995B corrects for the feeddown and finds the B --> J/psi(1S) (direct) X branching ratio.


pdgid: S049S25
text:
Also reports the measurement of psi(2S) --> lepton+ lepton- polarization produced directly from B decay.


pdgid: S049S25
text:
BALEST 1995B assume PDG 1994 values for sub mode branching ratios. They find B(B --> psi(2S) X, psi(2S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.30+-0.05+-0.04 and B(B --> psi(2S) X, psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 0.37+-0.05+-0.05. Weighted average is quoted for B(B --> psi(2S) X).


pdgid: S049R89
text:
ABE 2002L uses PDG 2001 values for B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) and B(chi_c1,c2 --> J/psi(1S) gamma).


pdgid: S049R89
text:
CHEN 2001   reports 0.00414+-0.00031+-0.00040 from a measurement of [G(B --> chi_c1(1P) anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049R89
text:
BALEST 1995B assume B(chi_c1(1P) --> J/psi(1S) gamma) = 27.3+-1.6E-2, the PDG 1994 value. Fit to psi-photon invariant mass distribution allows for a chi_{{c1}}(1P) and a chi_{{c2}}(1P) component.


pdgid: S049R24
text:
CHEN 2001   reports 0.00383+-0.00031+-0.00040 from a measurement of [G(B --> chi_c1(1P) (direct) anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049R24
text:
BALEST 1995B assume PDG 1994 values. J/psi(1S) mesons are reconstructed in the e+ e- and mu+ mu- modes. The B --> chi_c1(1P) X branching ratio contains chi_{{c1}}(1P) mesons directly from B decays and also from feeddown through psi(2S) --> chi_c1(1P) gamma. Using the measured inclusive rates, BALEST 1995B corrects for the feeddown and finds the B --> chi_c1(1P) (direct) X branching ratio.


pdgid: S049R21
text:
CHEN 2001   reports 9.8+-4.8+-1.5E-4 from a measurement of [G(B --> chi_c2(1P) anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.135+-0.011, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 19.5+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


