# pdgfootnote

pdgid: S049R21
text:
BALEST 1995B assume B(chi_c2(1P) --> J/psi(1S) gamma) = 13.5+-1.1E-2, the PDG 1994 value. J/psi(1S) mesons are reconstructed in the e+ e- and mu+ mu- modes, and PDG 1994 branching fractions are used. If interpreted as signal, the 35+-13 events correspond to B(B --> chi_c2(1P) X) =0.25+-0.10+-0.03E-2.


pdgid: S049R22
text:
BALEST 1995B assume PDG 1994 values for sub mode branching ratios.  J/psi(1S) mesons are reconstructed in J/psi(1S) --> e+ e- and J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-. Search region 2960 <mass(eta_{{c}}(1S))<3010 MeV/c**2.


pdgid: S049S41
text:
AUSHEV 2010   reports [G(B --> K chi_c1(3872))/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0)] = 0.80+-0.20+-0.10E-4 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0) = 46+-16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S41
text:
GOKHROO 2006   reports [G(B --> K chi_c1(3872))/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> D0 Dbar0 pi0)] = 1.22+-0.31+0.23-0.30E-4 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> D0 Dbar0 pi0) = 55+-28E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049R20
text:
CHOI 2005 reports the observation of a near-threshold enhancement in the omega J/psi mass spectrum in exclusive B --> K omega J/psi. The new state, denoted as chi_{{c0}}(3915), is measured to have a mass of 3943+-11+-13 GeV/c**2 and a width Gamma = 87+-22+-26 MeV.


pdgid: S049S6
text:
ALBRECHT 1993I value is not independent of the sum of B --> K+ anything and B --> K- anything ALBRECHT 1994C values.


pdgid: S049S6
text:
Assuming Upsilon(4S) --> B Bbar, a total of 3.38+-0.34+-0.68 kaons per Upsilon(4S) decay is found (the second error is systematic).  In the context of the standard B-decay model, this leads to a value for (b-quark --> c-quark)/(b-quark --> all) of 1.09+-0.33+-0.13.


pdgid: S049S6
text:
GIANNINI 1982 at CESR-CUSB observed 1.58+-0.35 K0 per hadronic event much higher than 0.82+-0.10 below threshold.  Consistent with predominant b --> c X decay.


pdgid: S049S21
text:
Measurement relies on lepton-kaon correlations. It is for the weak decay vertex and does not include mixing of the neutral B meson.  Mixing effects were corrected for by assuming a mixing parameter r of (18.1+-4.3)%.


pdgid: S049S21
text:
Measurement relies on lepton-kaon correlations. It includes production through mixing of the neutral B meson.


pdgid: S049S26
text:
An average of B(B+ --> K^*(892)+ gamma) and B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 gamma) measurements reported in COAN 2000 by assuming full correlated systematic errors.


pdgid: S049S28
text:
COAN 2000 obtains a fitted signal yield of 15.9+5.7-5.2 events.  A search for contamination by K^*(1410) yielded a rate consistent with 0; the central value assumes no contamination.


pdgid: S049R15
text:
SAITO 2015 measured 3.51+-0.17+-0.33E-4 using a sum-of-exclusive approach in which 38 of the hadronic final states with mass(X_{{s}}) < 2.8 GeV/c**2 are reconstructed. The cut of minimum photon energy is E(gamma) > 1.9 GeV.


pdgid: S049R15
text:
We extrapolate the measured value to E(gamma)> 1.6 GeV using the method of BUCHMUELLER 2006 (average of three theoretical  models).


pdgid: S049R15
text:
Reports 3.21+-0.15+-0.29+-0.08E-4 for 1.8 < E(gamma) < 2.8 GeV, where the last systematic uncertainty is for model dependency. Results with other cutoffs are also reported.


pdgid: S049R15
text:
Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side. The measurement reported is 3.66+-0.85+-0.60E-4 for E(gamma)> 1.9 GeV.


pdgid: S049R15
text:
Measured using sums of seven exclusive final states B --> X_d(s)() gamma where X_{{d}(s)}}() is a nonstrange (strange) charmless hadronic system in mass range 0.5 -- 2.0 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S049R15
text:
Measured using sums of seven exclusive final states B --> X_d(s)() gamma where X_{{d}(s)}}()  is a nonstrange (strange) charmless hadronic system in mass range 0.6 -- 1.8 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S049R15
text:
ABE 2001F reports their systematic errors +-0.42+0.50-0.54E-4, where the second error is due to the theoretical uncertainty. We combine them in quadrature.


pdgid: S049R38
text:
Measured using sums of seven exclusive final states B --> X_d(s)() gamma where X_{{d}(s)}}()   is a nonstrange (strange) charmless hadronic system in mass range 0.6 -- 1.8 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S049R14
text:
ALBRECHT 1995D use full reconstruction of one B decay as tag. Two candidate events for charmless B decay can be interpreted as either b --> s gluon or b --> u transition.  If interpreted as b --> s gluon they find a branching ratio of ~0.026 or the upper limit quoted above. Result is highly model dependent.


pdgid: S049R48
text:
AUBERT,B 2004F reports branching ratio B --> eta^'() X_s() for high momentum eta^'() between 2.0 and 2.7 GeV/c in the Upsilon(4S) center-of-mass frame. X_{{s}} represents a recoil system consisting of a kaon and zero to four pions.


pdgid: S049R48
text:
BONVICINI 2003 observed a signal of 61.2+-13.9 events in B --> eta^' X_nc production for high momentum eta^' between 2.0 and 2.7 GeV/c in the Upsilon(4S) center-of-mass frame. The X_{{nc}} denotes ``charmless'' hadronic states recoiling against eta^'. The second error combines systematic and background subtraction uncertainties in quadrature.


pdgid: S049R48
text:
BROWDER 1998 observed a signal of 39.0+-11.6 events in high momentum B --> eta^' X_s production between 2.0 and 2.7 GeV/c.  The branching fraction is based on the interpretation of b --> s g, where the last error includes additional uncertainties due to the color-suppressed b --> backgrounds.


pdgid: S049R54
text:
Assumes Gamma(B --> rho gamma) = Gamma(B+ --> rho+ gamma)  =  2 Gamma(B0 --> rho0 gamma) and uses lifetime ratio of meanlife(B+)/meanlife(B0) = 1.071+-0.009.


pdgid: S049R54
text:
Assumes Gamma(B --> rho gamma) = Gamma(B+ --> rho+ gamma)  =  2 Gamma(B0 --> rho0 gamma) and uses lifetime ratio of meanlife(B+)/meanlife(B0) = 1.083+-0.017.


pdgid: S049R54
text:
COAN 2000 reports B(B --> rho gamma)/B(B --> K^*(892) gamma) <0.32 at 90%CL and scaled by the central value of B(B --> K^*(892) gamma)=4.24+-0.54+-0.32E-5.


pdgid: S049R9
text:
ALBRECHT 1993 excludes pi+- from K(S)0 and Lambda decays.  If included, they find 4.105+-0.025+-0.080.


pdgid: S049S16
text:
AUBERT 2007C  reports 0.045+-0.003+-0.012 from a measurement of [G(B --> Lambda_c()+ ~/~Lambdabar_c()- anything)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S16
text:
CRAWFORD 1992 result derived from lepton baryon correlations.  Assumes all charmed baryons in B0 and B+- decay are Lambda_{{c}}.


pdgid: S049S16
text:
ALBRECHT 1988E measured B(B --> Lambda_c()+ X).B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = (0.30+-0.12+-0.06)% and used B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = (2.2+-1.0)% from ABRAMS 1980 to obtain above number.


pdgid: S049S16
text:
Assuming all baryons result from charmed baryons, ALAM 1986 conclude the branching fraction is 7.4+-2.9%. The limit given above is model independent.


pdgid: S049R04
text:
LEES 2012 quotes also the measurement G(B --> Lambdabar_c()- lepton+  anything)/G(B --> Lambda_c()+ ~/~Lambdabar_c()- anything) = 1.2+-0.7+-0.4E-2.


pdgid: S049R02
text:
LEES 2012 quotes also the measurement G(B --> Lambdabar_c()- lepton+  anything)/G(B --> Lambdabar_c()- anything) = 1.7+-1.0+-0.6E-2.


pdgid: S049S78
text:
PROCARIO 1994   reports [G(B --> Sigmabar_c()-- anything)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 0.00021+-0.00008+-0.00007 which we divide by our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S79
text:
PROCARIO 1994   reports [G(B --> Sigmabar_c()- anything)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] < 0.00048 which we divide by our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35E-2.


pdgid: S049S80
text:
PROCARIO 1994   reports [G(B --> Sigmabar_c()0 anything)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 0.00023+-0.00008+-0.00007 which we divide by our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S82
text:
PROCARIO 1994   reports <0.0017 from a measurement of [G(B --> Sigmabar_c()0 N (N = p or n))/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.043, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35E-2.


pdgid: S049S9
text:
ALAM 1983B reported their result as >0.036+-0.006+-0.009. Data are consistent with equal yields of p and pbar.  Using assumed yields below cut, B(B --> p + X) = 0.03 not including protons from Lambda decays.


pdgid: S049S10
text:
ALAM 1983B reported their result as >0.022+-0.007+-0.004.  Values are for (B(Lambda X)+B(Lambdabar X))/2.  Data are consistent with equal yields of p and pbar.  Using assumed yields below cut, B(B --> Lambda X) = 0.03.


pdgid: S049S32
text:
ALBRECHT 1992O result is from simultaneous analysis of p and Lambda yields, p pbar and Lambda pbar correlations, and various lepton-baryon and lepton-baryon-antibaryon correlations.  Supersedes ALBRECHT 1989K.


pdgid: S049S32
text:
ALBRECHT 1989K obtain this result by adding their their measurements (5.5+-1.6)% for direct protons and (4.2+-0.5+-0.6)% for inclusive Lambda production. They then assume (5.5+-1.6)% for neutron production and add it in also.  Since each B decay has two baryons, they divide by 2 to obtain (7.6+-1.4)%.


pdgid: S049S43
text:
CRAWFORD 1992 value is not independent of their [Gamma(Lambda pbar anything)+Gamma(Lambdabar p anything)]/Gamma(total) value.


pdgid: S049S42
text:
CRAWFORD 1992 value is not independent of their Gamma(Lambda Lambdabar anything)/Gamma(total) value.


pdgid: S049S3
text:
Measured from sum of exclusive modes through K+, K+ pi0, K+ pi-, K+ pi- pi0, K+ pi- pi+, K(S)0, K0S pi0, K0S pi+, K0S pi+ pi0, and K0S pi + pi- corrected for unobserved modes.


pdgid: S049R76
text:
Measured in the union of 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4. LEES 2012S reports also individual measurements G(B --> K mu+ mu-)/G(B --> K e+ e-) = 0.74+0.40-0.31+-0.06 for 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and [G(B --> K mu+ mu-)G(B --> K e+ e-)] = 1.43+0.65-0.44+-0.12 for q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S049R77
text:
Measured in the union of 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4. LEES 2012S reports also individual measurements G(B --> K^*(892) mu+ mu-)/G(B --> K^*(892) e+ e-) = 1.06+0.48-0.33+-0.08 for 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and [G(B --> K^*(892) mu+ mu-)G(B --> K^*(892) e+ e-)] = 1.18+0.55-0.37+-0.11 for q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S049R61
text:
Assumes equal production rate for charge and neutral B meson pairs, isospin invariance, lepton universality for B --> K lepton+ lepton-, and B(B --> K^*(892) mu+ mu-) = 1.33. The second error is total systematic uncertainties including model dependence.


pdgid: S049R62
text:
Assumes the partial width ratio of electron and muon modes to be Gamma(B --> K^*(892) e+ e-)/Gamma(B --> K^*(892) mu+ mu-) = 1.33.


pdgid: S049R62
text:
For averaging K^*(892) mu+ mu- and K^*(892) e+ e- modes, AUBERT 2002L assumed B(B --> K^*(892) e+ e-)/B(B --> K^*(892) mu+ mu-) = 1.2.


pdgid: S049CP2
text:
Measured with 16 exclusively reconstructed B --> X_s gamma decays with 0.6 < mass(X_{{s}})< 2.0 GeV/c**2 (ten charged and six neutral self-tagging B modes).


pdgid: S049CP2
text:
Uses a sum of exclusively reconstructed B --> X_s() decay modes, with X_{{s}}() mass between 0.6 and 2.8 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S049CP2
text:
This measurement is performed inclusively for recoil mass X_{{s}} less than 2.1 GeV, which corresponds to -0.093 < A_{{CP}}  < 0.096 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S049CP4
text:
Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S). Uses an opposite side lepton tag. Requires center-of-mass frame E(gamma) > 2.1 GeV.


pdgid: S049CP3
text:
Measured from sum of exclusive modes through K+, K+ pi0, K+ pi-, K+ pi- pi0, K+ pi- pi+, K0S pi+, and K0S pi+ pi0.


pdgid: S049CP3
text:
The final state flavor is determined by the kaon and pion charges where modes with X_{{s}} = K(S)0, K0S pi0 or K0S pi+ pi- are not used.


pdgid: S049CPA
text:
Measured from sum of exclusive modes through K+, K+ pi0, K+ pi-, K+ pi- pi0, K+ pi- pi+, K0S pi+, and K0S pi + pi-0.


pdgid: S049CP5
text:
Measured in the union of 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4. LEES 2012S reports also individual measurements A(CP)(B --> K^* lepton+ lepton-) = -0.13+0.18-0.19+-0.01 for 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and A(CP)(B --> K^* lepton+ lepton-) = 0.16+0.18-0.19+-0.01 for q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S049FL9
text:
Measured by combining B0 and B+ with e and mu as leptons. Results are also provided  separately for B0 and B+.


pdgid: S049A20
text:
Events are reconstructed in B0 --> K^*()0 ( --> K+ pi- ) e+ e- and B+ --> K^*()+ ( --> K0S pi+ ) e+ e-  decay modes. The effective dielectron invariant mass is required to be in the range 0.0008 <  q**2 < 1.12 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S049A20
text:
A(T)**Im and A(T)**(2) measure the ratio of the right- and left-handed Wilson  coefficients, C(7)**'/C(7), which constrains non-SM contributions at small q**2.


pdgid: S049PBL
text:
Measured from sum of exclusive modes through K+, K+ pi0, K+ pi-, K+ pi- pi0, K+ pi- pi+, K(S)0,  K0S pi0, K0S pi+, K0S pi+ pi0, and K0S pi + pi- corrected for unobserved modes.


pdgid: S049FB1
text:
Using an unbinned max. likelihood fits to the M(bc) distribution in five q**2 bins for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0.


pdgid: S049FBE
text:
Uses K^* --> K- pi+, K- pi0, K0S pi- in the range M(K pi) < 1.1 GeV/c**2.  Uncertainty is statistical only.


pdgid: S049A00
text:
Uses the sum of 10 exclusive X_{{s}} modes in the range M(X_{{s}}) > 1.1 GeV/c**2.  Uncertainty is statistical only.


pdgid: S049A07
text:
Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side. The result is for E(gamma)  > 2.2 GeV.


pdgid: S049IS1
text:
Uses the production ratio of charged and neutral B from Upsilon(4S) decays and the lifetime ratio meanlife(B+)/meanlife(B0) = 1.071+-0.009.  The 90% CL interval is 0.017< Delta(0+)< 0.116


pdgid: S049IS1
text:
Uses the production ratio of charged and neutral B from Upsilon(4S) decays R**+/0 = 1.006+-0.048 and the lifetime ratio of tau(B+) / tau(B0) = 1.083+-0.017. The 90% CL interval is -0.046 < Delta(0+) < 0.146.


pdgid: S049IA3
text:
For 1.0 < q**2 < 6.0 GeV**2/c**4 using both mu+ mu- and e+ e- as a  lepton pair. Measurements in other q**2 bins are also reported.


pdgid: S049IA3
text:
For 1.1 < q**2 < 6.0 GeV**2/c**4 using mu+ mu- as a lepton pair and assuming isospin symmetry for the B --> J/psi(1S) K. Measurements in other q**2 bins are also reported.


pdgid: S049IA3
text:
For 15.0 < q**2 < 19.0 GeV**2/c**4 using mu+ mu- as a lepton pair and assuming isospin symmetry for the B --> J/psi(1S) K. Measurements in other q**2 bins are also reported.


pdgid: S049IA4
text:
For 1.1 < q**2 < 6.0 GeV**2/c**4 using mu+ mu- as a lepton pair and assuming isospin symmetry for the B(B --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)). Measurements in other q**2 bins are also reported.


pdgid: S049IA4
text:
For 15.0 < q**2 < 22.0 GeV**2/c**4 using mu+ mu- as a lepton pair and assuming isospin symmetry for the B(B --> J/ psi(1S) K^*(892)). Measurements in other q**2 bins are also reported.


pdgid: S049AEL
text:
The leptons are required to have E(l) > 1.5 GeV in the B rest frame. The result with E(l) > 0.6 GeV is also given.


pdgid: S049AEL
text:
Uses E(e) > 1.5 GeV and also reports moments with other minimum minimum  E(e) conditions, as low as E(e) > 0.6 GeV.


pdgid: S049GM1
text:
LEES 2012U uses E(gamma) > 1.897 GeV to calculate the moments; the moments are used to calculate the HQET parameters mass(b) = 4.579+0.032-0.029 GeV/c**2 and mu_{{pi}}^2() = 0.257+0.034-0.039GeV**2 in the shape function model. The same HQET parameters are also determined in the kinetic model.


pdgid: S051T
text:
ABREU 1994L uses charged particle impact parameters. Their result from inclusively reconstructed secondary vertices is superseded by ABREU 1996E.


pdgid: S051T
text:
ABREU 1992 is combined result of muon and hadron impact parameter analyses.  Hadron tracks gave (12.7+-0.4+-1.2)*10**-13s for an admixture of B species weighted by production fraction and mean charge multiplicity, while muon tracks gave (13.0+-1.0+-0.8)*10**-13s for an admixture weighted by production fraction and semileptonic branching fraction.


pdgid: S051T
text:
BUSKULIC 1992G use J/psi(1S) tags to measure the average b lifetime.  This is comparable to other methods only if the J/psi(1S) branching fractions of the different b-flavored hadrons are in the same ratio.


pdgid: S051T
text:
Using Z --> e+ X or mu+ X, ADEVA 1991H determined the average lifetime for an admixture of B hadrons from the impact parameter distribution of the lepton.


pdgid: S051T
text:
Using Z --> J/psi(1S) X, J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-, ALEXANDER 1991G determined the average lifetime for an admixture of B hadrons from the decay point of the J/psi(1S).


pdgid: S051T
text:
Using Z --> e X or mu X, DECAMP 1991C determines the average lifetime for an admixture of B hadrons from the signed impact parameter distribution of the lepton.


pdgid: S051T
text:
LYONS 1990 combine the results of the B lifetime measurements of ONG 1989, BRAUNSCHWEIG 1989B, KLEM 1988, and ASH 1987, and JADE data by private communication. They use statistical techniques which include variation of the error with the mean life, and possible correlations between the systematic errors.  This result is not independent of the measured results used in our average.


pdgid: S051T
text:
We have combined an overall scale error of 15% in quadrature with the systematic error of +-0.7 to obtain +-2.1 systematic error.


pdgid: S051DTB
text:
Data analyzed using both the jet charge and the charge of secondary vertex in the opposite hemisphere.


pdgid: S051R9
text:
The analysis is based on a neural network, to estimate the charge of the weakly-decaying bhadron by distinguishing its decay products from particles produced at the primary vertex.


pdgid: S051R41
text:
AAIJ 2020V measures the average value using the observed B_s()0 --> J/psi phi and B+ --> J/psi K+ yields,  over the ranges b-hadron pT of 0.5 and 40 GeV and eta of 2.0 and 6.5.  The value is not used in averages as BR-related systematic uncertainties are not evaluated.


pdgid: S051R41
text:
AAIJ 2020V  reports [G(bbar --> B_s()0)/G(bbar --> B+)] * [B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] = 0.1238+-0.0010+-0.0022 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi) = 1.03+-0.04E-3, B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R41
text:
AAIJ 2020V  reports [G(bbar --> B_s()0)/G(bbar --> B+)] * [B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] = 0.1270+-0.0007+-0.0022 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi) = 1.03+-0.04E-3, B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R41
text:
AAIJ 2020V  reports [G(bbar --> B_s()0)/G(bbar --> B+)] * [B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] = 0.1326+-0.0007+-0.0023 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi) = 1.03+-0.04E-3, B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R2
text:
AAIJ 2019AD  measured the average value using b-hadron semileptonic decays and assuming  isospin symmetry for b-hadron pT of 4 and 25 GeV and eta of 2 and 5.


pdgid: S051R2
text:
AAIJ 2011F measured f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.253+-0.017+-0.017+-0.020, where the errors are statistical, systematic, and theoretical. We divide their value by 2. Our second error combines systematic and theoretical uncertainties.


pdgid: S051R2
text:
AALTONEN 2008N  reports [G(bbar --> B_s()0)/[G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)]] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 5.76+-0.18+0.45-0.42E-3 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R2
text:
ABE 1999P uses the numbers of K^*(892)0, K^*(892)+, and phi(1020) events produced in association with the double semileptonic decays b --> c mu- X with c --> s mu+ X.


pdgid: S051R01
text:
AAD 2015CM measurement is derived from the observed B_s()0 --> J/psi phi and B_d()0 --> J/psi K^*()0  yields  and a recent theory prediction of B(B_s()0 --> J/psi phi)/B(B_d()0 --> J/psi K^*()0).   The second uncertainty combines in quadrature systematic and theoretical uncertainties.


pdgid: S051R01
text:
AAIJ 2013P studies also separately the pT(B) and eta(B) dependency of G(bbar --> B_s()0)/G(bbar --> B0),   finding f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}(pT)= (0.256+-0.020) + (-2.0+-0.6) E-3 /GeV/c  (pT-<pT>) and f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}(eta)= (0.256+-0.020) + (0.005+-0.006)  (eta-<eta>), where <pT> = 10.4 GeV/c and <eta> = 3.28.  AAIJ 2013P reports the measurement as 0.238+-0.004+-0.015+-0.021 where the last  uncertainly is theoretical.


pdgid: S051R01
text:
AAIJ 2021Y uses hadronic decays B0 --> D- pi+, B0 --> D- K+, B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+ and  B_s()0 --> J/psi phi as well as semileptonic B0 and B_{{s}}()0 decays. Measured within the  pT range [0.5,40] GeV/c, eta range [2, 6.4].


pdgid: S051R3
text:
AAIJ 2019AD measured the average value for Lambda_{{b}}()0 using semileptonic decays and  assuming isospin symmetry for b-hadron pT of 4 and 25 GeV and eta of 2 and 5.


pdgid: S051R3
text:
AAIJ 2012J measured the ratio to be (0.404+-0.017+-0.027+-0.105) x [1  - (0.031+-0.004+-0.003)xP(T)]using b-hadron semileptonic decays where  the P(T) is the momentum of charmed hadron-muon pair in GeV/c.We quote their weighted average  value where  the second error combines systematic and the error on B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+).


pdgid: S051R3
text:
AALTONEN 2009E errata to the measurement reported in AFFOLDER 2000E using the pT  spectra from fully reconstructed B0 and Lambda_{{b}}() decays.


pdgid: S051R3
text:
AALTONEN 2008N  reports [G(bbar --> b-baryon)/[G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)]] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 14.1+-0.6+5.3-4.4E-3 which we divide by our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R6
text:
ACCIARRI 1996C assumes relative b semileptonic decay rates e:mu:tau of 1:1:0.25. Based on missing-energy spectrum.


pdgid: S051S45
text:
Uses the combination of lepton transverse momentum spectrum and the correlation between the charge of the lepton and opposite jet charge.  The first error is statistic and the second error is the total systematic error including the modeling.


pdgid: S051S45
text:
ABBIENDI 2000E result is determined by comparing the distribution of several kinematic variables of leptonic events in a lifetime tagged Z --> b bbar sample using artificial neural network techniques. The first error is statistic; the second error is the total systematic error.


pdgid: S051S45
text:
ACCIARRI 2000 result obtained from a combined fit of R(b)= Gamma(Z --> b bbar)/Gamma(Z --> hadrons) and B(b --> lepton nu X), using double-tagging method.


pdgid: S051S45
text:
ABREU 1995D give systematic errors +-0.0019 (model) and 0.0012 (R(c)). We combine these in quadrature.


pdgid: S051S45
text:
BUSKULIC 1994G uses e and mu events. This value is from a global fit to the lepton p and pT (relative to jet) spectra which also determines the b and c production  fractions, the fragmentation functions, and the forward-backward asymmetries.  This branching ratio depends primarily on the ratio of dileptons to single leptons at high pT, but the lower pT portion of the lepton spectrum is included in the global fit to reduce the model dependence.  The model dependence is +-0.0026 and is included in the systematic error.


pdgid: S051S45
text:
ABREU 1993C event count includes e e events.  Combining e e, mu mu, and e mu events, they obtain 0.100+-0.007+-0.007.


pdgid: S051S1
text:
ADEVA 1991C measure the average B(b --> e X) branching ratio using single and double tagged b enhanced Z events. Combining e and mu results, they obtain 0.113+-0.010+-0.006.  Constraining the initial number of b quarks by the Standard Model prediction (378+-3 MeV) for the decay of the Z into b bbar, the electron result gives 0.112+-0.004+-0.008. They obtain 0.119+-0.003+-0.006 when e and mu results are combined.  Used to measure the b bbar width itself, this electron result gives 370+-12+-24 MeV and combined with the muon result gives 385+-7+-22 MeV.


pdgid: S051S1
text:
ABE 1993E experiment also measures forward-backward asymmetries and fragmentation functions for b and c.


pdgid: S051S2
text:
ABREU 1993C event count includes mu mu events.  Combining e e, mu mu, and e mu events, they obtain 0.100+-0.007+-0.007.


pdgid: S051S2
text:
ADEVA 1991C measure the average B(b --> e X) branching ratio using single and double tagged b enhanced Z events. Combining e and mu results, they obtain 0.113+-0.010+-0.006.  Constraining the initial number of b quarks by the Standard Model prediction (378+-3 MeV) for the decay of the Z into b bbar, the muon result gives 0.123+-0.003+-0.006. They obtain 0.119+-0.003+-0.006 when e and mu results are combined.  Used to measure the b bbar width itself, this muon result gives 394+-9+-22 MeV and combined with the electron result gives 385+-7+-22 MeV.


pdgid: S051R15
text:
ABREU 2000R reports their experiment's uncertainties +-0.0019+-0.0016+-0.0018, where the first error is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is the uncertainty due to the Dbranching fraction.  We combine first two in quadrature.


pdgid: S051R15
text:
AKERS 1995Q  reports [G(bbar --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton  anything)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] = 1.82+-0.20+-0.12E-3 which we divide by our best value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.38+-0.16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R16
text:
ABREU 2000R reports their experiment's uncertainties +-0.0034+-0.0036+-0.0017, where the first error is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is the uncertainty due to the Dbranching fraction.  We combine first two in quadrature.


pdgid: S051R16
text:
AKERS 1995Q  reports [G(bbar --> Dbar0 lepton+ nu_lepton  anything)/G(total)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = 2.52+-0.14+-0.17E-3 which we divide by our best value B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.945+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R17
text:
ABREU 2000R reports their experiment's uncertainties +-0.0017+-0.0013+-0.0009, where the first error is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is the uncertainty due to the Dbranching fraction.  We combine first two in quadrature.


pdgid: S051R17
text:
AKERS 1995Q reports [B(bbar --> D^* lepton+ nu_lepton X) * B(D^*()+ --> D0 pi+) * B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = (7.53+-0.47+-0.56E-4) and uses B(D^*()+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.681+-0.013 and B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 0.0401+-0.0014 to obtain the above result.  The first error is the experiments error and the second error is the systematic error from the D^*()+ and D0 branching ratios.


pdgid: S051R31
text:
Obtained from the best fit of the MC simulated events to the data based on the b --> X_u lepton nu neutral network output distributions.


pdgid: S051R31
text:
ABREU 2000D result obtained from a fit to the numbers of decays in  b --> u enriched and depleted samples and their lepton spectra, and assuming |V(c b)|= 0.0384+-0.0033 and tau(b)= 1.564+-0.014ps.


pdgid: S051S94
text:
ABREU 1995D give systematic errors +-0.0033 (model) and 0.0032 (R(c)). We combine these in quadrature. This result is from the same global fit as their Gamma(bbar --> lepton+ nu_lepton X) data.


pdgid: S051S94
text:
BUSKULIC 1994G uses e and mu events. This value is from the same global fit as their Gamma(bbar --> lepton+ nu_lepton anything)/Gamma(total) data.


pdgid: S051R24
text:
BUSKULIC 1996Y  reports 0.605+-0.024+-0.016 from a measurement of [G(bbar --> Dbar0  anything)/G(total)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] assuming B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 0.0383, which we rescale to our best value B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.945+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R70
text:
The second error is the total of systematic uncertainties including the branching fractions used in the measurement.


pdgid: S051R25
text:
BUSKULIC 1996Y  reports 0.234+-0.013+-0.010 from a measurement of [G(bbar --> D-  anything)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] assuming B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 0.091, which we rescale to our best value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.38+-0.16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R32
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1997W assumes B(D_2^*(2460)0 --> D^*()+ pi-) = 0.21+-0.04 and Gamma(b bbar)/Gamma(hadrons) = 0.216 at Z decay.


pdgid: S051R26
text:
BUSKULIC 1996Y  reports 0.183+-0.019+-0.009 from a measurement of [G(bbar --> D_s^-  anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036, which we rescale to our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R27
text:
BUSKULIC 1996Y  reports 0.110+-0.014+-0.006 from a measurement of [Gamma(b --> Lambda_c+  anything)/Gamma(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.044, which we rescale to our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R28
text:
ABREU 1998D results are extracted from a fit to the b-tagging probability distribution based on the impact parameter.


pdgid: S051R28
text:
BUSKULIC 1996Y assumes PDG 1996 production fractions for B0, B+, B_{{s}}, b baryons, and PDG 1996 branching ratios for charm decays. This is sum of their inclusive Dbar0, D-, Dbar_{{s}}, and Lambda_{{c}} branching ratios, corrected to include inclusive Xi_{{c}} and charmonium.


pdgid: S051S7
text:
ABREU 1994P is an inclusive measurement from b decays at the Z.  Uses J/psi(1S) --> e+ e- and mu+ mu- channels. Assumes Gamma(Z --> b bbar)/Gamma(hadron)=0.22.


pdgid: S051S7
text:
ADRIANI 1993J is an inclusive measurement from b decays at the Z.  Uses J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu- and J/psi(1S) --> e+ e- channels.


pdgid: S051S7
text:
ADRIANI 1992 measurement is an inclusive result for B(Z --> J/psi(1S) X) = 4.1+-0.7+-0.3E-3 which is used to extract the b-hadron contribution to J/psi(1S) production.


pdgid: S051S25
text:
ABREU 1994P is an inclusive measurement from b decays at the Z.  Uses psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-, J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu- channels. Assumes Gamma(Z --> b bbar)/Gamma(hadron)=0.22.


pdgid: S051R95
text:
AAIJ 2012BD reports B(b --> psi (2S) X) = 3.08+-0.07+-0.36+-0.27E-3 and we  divided our best value of B(b --> psi (1S) X) = 1.16+-0.10E-2 as the ratio listed here.


pdgid: S051R95
text:
CHATRCHYAN 2012AK really reports Gamma(51)/Gamma = 3.08+-0.12+-0.13+-0.42E-3 assuming PDG 2010 value of Gamma(50)/Gamma = 1.16+-0.10E-2 which we present as a ratio  of Gamma(51)/Gamma(50) = 26.5+-1.0+-1.1+-2.8E-2.


pdgid: S051R95
text:
CHATRCHYAN 2012AK reports 26.5+-1.0+-1.1+-2.8E-2 from a measurement of [G(bbar --> psi(2S)  anything)/G(bbar --> J/psi(1S)  anything)] * [B(psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = 7.7+-0.8E-3,B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.93+-0.06E-2, which we rescale to our best values B(psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = 8.0+-0.6E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R43
text:
AAIJ 2024AP reports [G(bbar --> chi_c0(1P) anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar)] = 6.74+-1.18+-0.62E-7 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar) = 2.21+-0.14E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R00
text:
AAIJ 2017BB reports [G(bbar --> chi_c0(1P) anything)/G(bbar --> eta_c(1S) anything)] / [B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> phi phi)] = 0.147+-0.023+-0.011 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi) = 1.8+-0.4E-3, B(chi_c0(1P) --> phi phi) = 8.48+-0.31E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R89
text:
AAIJ 2024AP reports [G(bbar --> chi_c1(1P)  anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar)] = 3.88+-0.91+-0.36E-7 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar) = 7.6+-0.4E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R89
text:
ABREU 1994P  reports 1.4+-0.6+0.4-0.2E-2 from a measurement of [G(bbar --> chi_c1(1P)  anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 27.3+-1.6E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R89
text:
ADRIANI 1993J  reports 2.4+-0.9+-0.2E-2 from a measurement of [G(bbar --> chi_c1(1P)  anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 27.3+-1.6E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051S59
text:
ADRIANI 1993J is a ratio of inclusive measurements from b decays at the Z using only the J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu- channel since some systematics cancel.


pdgid: S051R05
text:
AAIJ 2024AP reports [G(bbar --> chi_c1(1P)  anything)/G(bbar --> chi_c0(1P) anything)] / [B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar)] = 0.58+-0.23+-0.02 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar) = 2.21+-0.14E-4, B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar) = 7.6+-0.4E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R05
text:
AAIJ 2017BB reports [G(bbar --> chi_c1(1P)  anything)/G(bbar --> chi_c0(1P) anything)] / [B(chi_c0(1P) --> phi phi)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> phi phi)] = 0.50+-0.11+-0.01 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(chi_c0(1P) --> phi phi) = 8.48+-0.31E-4, B(chi_c1(1P) --> phi phi) = 4.26+-0.21E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R03
text:
AAIJ 2017BB reports [G(bbar --> chi_c1(1P)  anything)/G(bbar --> eta_c(1S) anything)] / [B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> phi phi)] = 0.073+-0.016+-0.006 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi) = 1.8+-0.4E-3, B(chi_c1(1P) --> phi phi) = 4.26+-0.21E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R44
text:
AAIJ 2024AP reports [G(bbar --> chi_c2(1P) anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar)] = 1.13+-0.83+-0.10E-7 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar) = 7.3+-0.4E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R06
text:
AAIJ 2024AP reports [G(bbar --> chi_c2(1P) anything)/G(bbar --> chi_c0(1P) anything)] / [B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar)] * [B(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar)] = 0.17+-0.12+-0.01 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar) = 2.21+-0.14E-4, B(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar) = 7.3+-0.4E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R06
text:
AAIJ 2017BB reports [G(bbar --> chi_c2(1P) anything)/G(bbar --> chi_c0(1P) anything)] / [B(chi_c0(1P) --> phi phi)] * [B(chi_c2(1P) --> phi phi)] = 0.56+-0.10+-0.01 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(chi_c0(1P) --> phi phi) = 8.48+-0.31E-4, B(chi_c2(1P) --> phi phi) = 1.23+-0.07E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R04
text:
AAIJ 2017BB reports [G(bbar --> chi_c2(1P) anything)/G(bbar --> eta_c(1S) anything)] / [B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi)] * [B(chi_c2(1P) --> phi phi)] = 0.081+-0.013+-0.005 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi) = 1.8+-0.4E-3, B(chi_c2(1P) --> phi phi) = 1.23+-0.07E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R07
text:
AAIJ 2017BB reports [G(bbar --> eta_c(2S) anything  ,  eta_c --> phi phi)/G(bbar --> eta_c(1S) anything)] / [B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi)] = 0.040+-0.011+-0.004 which we multiply by our best value B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi) = 1.8+-0.4E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S051R5
text:
ADAM 1996 measurement obtained from a fit to the rapidity distribution of pi0**'s in Z --> b b events.


pdgid: S051R36
text:
Measured from R = [B(bbar --> Xi_b()+)xB(Xi_b() --> J/psi Xi+)]/[B(bbar --> Lambdabar_b()0)xB(Lambdabar_b()0 --> J/psi Lambdabar0)] and  assumes width(Xi_b()+ --> J/psi Xi+)/width(Lambdabar_b()0 --> J/psi Lambdabar0) =  3/2 related through SU(3) flavor symmetry.


pdgid: S051R29
text:
Average branching fraction of weakly decaying B hadrons into two long-lived charged hadrons, weighted by their production cross section and lifetimes.


pdgid: S051R7
text:
ABREU 1998D results are extracted from a fit to the b-tagging probability distribution based on the impact parameter. The expected hidden charm contribution of 0.026+-0.004 has been subtracted.


pdgid: S051S4
text:
Both ABBOTT 1998B and GLENN 1998 claim that the efficiency quoted in ALBAJAR 1991C was overestimated by a large factor.


pdgid: S051R20
text:
GROSSMAN 1996 limit is derived from the ALEPH BUSKULIC 1995 limit B(B+ --> tau+ nu_tau) <1.8E-3 at CL=90% using conservative simplifying assumptions.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
The average B mixing parameter is determined simultaneously with b and c forward-backward asymmetries in the fit.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
ACCIARRI 1999D uses maximum-likelihood fits to extract chi_{{b}} as well as the A(FB)**b in Z --> b bbar events containing prompt leptons.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
This ABREU 1994J result is from 5182 lepton lepton and 279 Lambda lepton events. The systematic error includes 0.004 for model dependence.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
ALEXANDER 1996 uses a maximum likelihood fit to simultaneously extract chi as well as the forward-backward asymmetries in e+ e- --> Z --> b bbar and c cbar.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
ABREU 1994F uses the average electric charge sum of the jets recoiling against a b-quark jet tagged by a high p(T) muon. The result is for chibar = f_d chi_d+0.9f_s chi_s.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
This ABREU 1994J result combines lepton lepton, Lambda lepton, and jet-charge lepton (ABREU 1994F) analyses. It is for chibar = f(d)chi_{{d}}+0.96f(s)chi_{{s}}.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
ADEVA 1990P measurement uses e e, mu mu, and e mu events from 118k events at the Z. Superseded by ADEVA 1992C.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
These experiments are not in the average because the combination of B_{{s}} and B_{{d}} mesons which they see could differ from those at higher energy.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
The WEIR 1990 measurement supersedes the limit obtained in SCHAAD 1985. The 90% CL are 0.06 and 0.38.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
ALBAJAR 1987C measured chi = (Bbar0 --> B0 --> mu+ X) divided by the average production weighted semileptonic branching fraction for B hadrons at 546 and 630 GeV.


pdgid: S051EPS
text:
AABOUD 2017E reports a measurement of charge asymmetry of A(SL)**b = -25+-21+-19E-3 in  lepton + jets t tbar events in which a b-hadron decays semileptonically to a soft muon.


pdgid: S051EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2014 reports a measurement of like-sign dimuon charge asymmetry of A(SL)**b = -4.96+-1.53+-0.72E-3 in semileptonic b-hadron decays.


pdgid: S051EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2011U reports a measurement of like-sign dimuon charge asymmetry of A_{{SL}}^b() = -7.87+-1.72+-0.93E-3 in semileptonic b-hadron decays.


pdgid: S051EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2010H reports a measurement of like-sign dimuon charge asymmetry of A(SL)**b=-9.57+-2.51+-1.46E-3 in semileptonic b-hadron decays. Using the measured production ratio of B_{{d}}()0 and B_{{s}}()0, and the asymmetry of B_{{d}}()0 A(SL)**d=-4.7+-4.6E-3 measured from B-factories, they obtain the asymmetry for B_{{s}}()0 as A(SL)**s=-14.6+-7.5E-3.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
PRIM 2024 value established from a complete set of angular coefficients for exclusive B --> Dbar^* lepton+ nu_lepton  decays with hadronic tag-side reconstruction. The |V_(cb)|xF(1) is  derived from the extracted the BGL and CNL form factor parameters: |V_(cb)|(BGL)  = 40.7+-0.7E-3 with the zero-recoil lattice QCD point F(1) = 0.900+-0.009 and  |V_(cb)|(CNL) = 40.3+-0.6E-3.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
ADACHI 2023J result comes from differential shapes of exclusive B --> D^* lepton- nu_lepton  (lepton = e or mu) decays. Using CNL form factor parametrization and the zero-recoil  lattice QCD point F(1) = 0.906+-0.013 ADACHI 2023J finds  |V(cb)|(CNL) = 40.57+-0.31+-0.95+-0.58E-3 where the last uncertainty  is due to the prediction of F(1). Also reports a measurement of  |V(cb)|(BGL) = 40.13+-0.27+-0.93+-0.58E-3 using BGL form factors  parametrization.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
WAHEED 2021 uses fully reconstructed D^*()- lepton+ nu events (lepton = e or  mu) and  eta_{{EW}} = 1.0066.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
Obtained from a global fit to B --> D^(*)() lepton nu_lepton events, with reconstructed D0 lepton and D+ lepton final states and rho**2 = 1.22+-0.02+-0.07.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
Average of the B0 --> D^*(2010)- lepton+ nu and B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)) lepton+ nu modes with rho**2 = 1.61+-0.09+-0.21 and f(+-) = 0.521+-0.012.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
ABREU 2001H measured using about 5000 partial reconstructed D^* sample with a rho**2=1.34+-0.14+0.24-0.22.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
ABBIENDI 2000Q: measured using both inclusively and exclusively reconstructed D^*()+- samples with a rho**2=1.21+-0.12+-0.20. The statistical and systematic correlations between |V_(cb)|*F(1) and rho**2 are 0.90 and 0.54 respectively.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
BUSKULIC 1997: measured using exclusively reconstructed D^*()+- with a a**2=0.31+-0.17+-0.08. The statistical correlation is 0.92.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
Measured from differential shapes of exclusive B --> D^* lepton- nu_lepton decays with hadronic  tag-side reconstruction and extracting the CNL and BGL form factor parameters. PRIM 2023  finds |V(cb)|(CNL) = 40.2+-0.9E-3 with the zero-recoil lattice QCD point  F(1) = 0.906+-0.013. PRIM 2023 provides also a measurement of  |V(cb)|(BGL) = 40.7+-1.0E-3.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
Measured using the dependence of B- --> D^*()0 e- nubar_e decay differential rate and the form factor description by CAPRINI 1998 with rho**2 = 1.16+-0.06+-0.08.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
Measured using exclusive B0 --> D^*(892)- e+ nu decays with rho**2= 1.35+-0.17+-0.19 and a correlation of 0.91.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
BARISH 1995: measured using both exclusive reconstructed B0 --> D^*()- lepton+ nu and B+ --> D^*()0 lepton+ nu samples.  They report their experiment's uncertainties +-0.0019+-0.0018+-0.0008, where the first error is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is the uncertainty in the lifetimes. We combine the last two in quadrature.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
Obtained from a 2D fit to the combined B --> Dbar lepton+ nu_lepton sample with a  model-independent parametrization according to Boyd-Grinstein-Lebed (BGL), in which a hadronic  decay of the second B meson is fully reconstructed.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
Obtained from a fit to the combined partially reconstructed B --> Dbar lepton nu_lepton sample while tagged by the other fully reconstructed B meson in the event. Also reports fitted rho**2 = 1.09+-0.05.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
Obtained from a fit to the combined B --> Dbar lepton+ nu_lepton sample in which a hadronic decay of the second B meson is fully reconstructed and rho**2 = 1.20+-0.09+-0.04.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
Obtained from a global fit to B --> D^(*)() lepton nu_lepton events, with reconstructed D0 lepton and D+ lepton final states and rho**2 = 1.20+-0.04+-0.07.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
BARTELT 1999: measured using both exclusive reconstructed B0 --> D- lepton+ nu and B+ --> D0 lepton+ nu samples.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
BUSKULIC 1997: measured using exclusively reconstructed D+- with a a**2=-0.05+-0.53+-0.38. The statistical correlation is 0.99.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
Using the missing energy and momentum to extract kinematic information about the undetected neutrino in the B0 --> D- lepton+ nu decay.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
ATHANAS 1997: measured using both exclusive reconstructed B0 --> D- lepton+ nu and B+ --> D0 lepton+ nu samples with a rho**2=0.59+-0.22+-0.12(-0)**+0.59. They report their experiment's uncertainties +-0.0044+-0.0048+0.0053-0.0012, where the first error is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is the uncertainty due to the form factor model variations.  We combine the last two in quadrature.


pdgid: S052A00
text:
Measured from an inclusive sample of D_s()- mu+ candidates using CNL parameterization of the  form factor. AAIJ 2020E provides also measurement of |V(cb)| = 42.3+-0.8+-0.9+-1.2E-3  using BGL parameterization of the form factor. The third uncertainty is due to the external inputs  used in the measurement.


pdgid: S085DM
text:
LEE-FRANZINI 1990 value is for an admixture of B0 and B+. They measure 46.7+-0.4+-0.2 MeV for an admixture of B0, B+, and B_{{s}}, and  use the shape of the photon line to separate the above value.


pdgid: M244DM+
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{1}}()+)-mass(B0)] - (mass(B^*()0)-mass(B0)) -   mass(pi+) = 260.9+-1.8+-3.1 MeV which we adjust by the pi+ mass and assume (mass(B^*()0)-mass(B0)) =   (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) = 45.01+-0.30+-0.23 MeV. The masses inside the square brackets  were  measured for each candidate event.


pdgid: M244DM+
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{1}}(5721)+) - mass(B^*()0) - mass(pi+) = 262+-3+1-3 MeV which we adjusted by the pi+ mass.


pdgid: M244DM1
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{1}}()0)-mass(B+)] - (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) -  mass(pi-) = 263.9+-0.7+-1.4 MeV which we adjust by the pi- mass and (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) =  45.01+-0.30+-0.23 MeV. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event.


pdgid: M244DM1
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{1}}(5721)0) - mass(B^*()+) - mass(pi-) = 262.7+-0.9+1.1-1.2 MeV which we adjusted by the pi- mass.


pdgid: M151M
text:
AFFOLDER 2001F uses the reconstructed Bmeson through semileptonic decay channels.  The fraction of light Bmesons that are produced at L=1 B^{**} states is measured to be 0.28+-0.06+-0.03.


pdgid: M151M
text:
BARATE 1998L uses fully reconstructed B mesons to search for B**** production in the B pi+- system. In the framework of heavy quark symmetry (HQS), they also measured the mass of B_{{2}}^* to be 5739+8-11+6-4 MeV/c**2 and the relative production rate of B(b --> B_2^* --> B^(*) pi)/B(b --> B_u,d) = (31+-9+6-5)%.


pdgid: M151M
text:
ACCIARRI 1999N uses inclusive reconstructed B mesons to search for B**** production in the B**(*)pi+- system. In the framework of HQET, they measured the mass of B^*_1 and B^*_2 to be 5670+-10+-13MeV and 5768+-5+-6 with the B(b --> B^**)= 32+-3+-6E-2.  They also reported the evidence for the existence of an excited B-meson state or mixture of states in the region 5.9 -- 6.0 GeV.


pdgid: M245DM+
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{2}}^*()+)-mass(B0)] - mass(pi+) = 318.1+-0.7+-0.4  MeV which we adjust by the pi+ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for  each candidate event.


pdgid: M245DM+
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{2}}^*(5747)+) - mass(B0) - mass(pi+) = 317.7+-1.2+0.3-0.9 MeV which we adjusted by the pi+ mass.


pdgid: M245DM2
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{2}}^*()0)-mass(B+)] - mass(pi-) = 320.6+-0.4+-0.3  MeV which we adjust by the pi- mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for  each candidate event.


pdgid: M245DM2
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{2}}^*(5747)0) - mass(B+) - mass(pi-) = 317.9+-1.2+0.8-0.9 MeV which we adjusted by the pi- mass.


pdgid: M245R03
text:
Converted from measured ratio of R = B(B_2^*()0 --> B^*()+ pi-) / B(B_2^*()0 --> B^(*)()+ pi-)  = 0.475+-0.095+-0.069.


pdgid: M246DM+
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()+)-mass(B0)] - mass(pi+) = 431+-13+-14 MeV  which we adjust by the pi+ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each  candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses two relativistic  Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M246DM+
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()+)-mass(B0)] - mass(pi+) = 455+-26+-14 MeV  which we adjust by the pi+ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each  candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses three relativistic  Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M246DM1
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()+)-mass(B0)] - (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) -  mass(pi+) = 425+-15+-14 MeV which we adjust by the pi+ mass. The masses inside the  square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes P =  -(-1)**J, (mass(B^*()0)-mass(B0)) = (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) = 45.01+-0.30+-0.23  MeV, and uses three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M246DM0
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()0)-mass(B+)] - mass(pi-) = 444+-5+-7 MeV   which we adjust by the pi- mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each   candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses two relativistic   Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M246DM0
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()0)-mass(B+)] - mass(pi-) = 471+-22+-7 MeV  which we adjust by the pi- mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each  candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses three relativistic  Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M246DM2
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()0)-mass(B+)] - (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) -  mass(pi-) = 444+-5+-7 MeV which we adjust by the pi- mass. The masses inside the square  brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes P =  -(-1)**J, (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) = 45.01+-0.30+-0.23 MeV, and uses three  relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M246W+
text:
Assuming P = (-1)**J and using two relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit  for mass difference.


pdgid: M246W+
text:
Assuming P = (-1)**J and using three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the  fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M246W+
text:
Assuming P = -(-1)**J and using three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in  the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M248DM+
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()+)-mass(B0)] - mass(pi+) = 545.8+-4.1+-2.5   MeV which we adjust by the pi+ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for   each candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses two relativistic   Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M248DM+
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{J}}(5970)+) - mass(B0) - mass(pi+) = 541+-5+-12 MeV which we adjusted by the pi+ mass.


pdgid: M248DM+
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()+)-mass(B0)] - mass(pi+) = 547+-5+-3 MeV  which we adjust by the pi+ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each  candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses three relativistic  Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M248DM1
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()+)-mass(B0)] - (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) -  mass(pi+) = 547+-4+-3 MeV which we adjust by the pi+ mass. The masses inside the square  brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes P =  -(-1)**J, (mass(B^*()0)-mass(B0)) = (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) = 45.01+-0.30+-0.23  MeV, and uses three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit  for mass difference.


pdgid: M248DM0
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()0)-mass(B+)] - mass(pi-) = 550.4+-2.9+-5.1  MeV which we adjust by the pi- mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for  each candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses two relativistic  Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M248DM0
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{J}}(5970)0) - mass(B+) - mass(pi-) = 558+-5+-12 MeV which we adjusted by the pi- mass.


pdgid: M248DM0
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()0)-mass(B+)] - mass(pi-) = 575+-6+-5 MeV  which we adjust by the pi- mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each  candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses three relativistic  Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M248DM2
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()0)-mass(B+)] - (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) -  mass(pi-) = 552+-4+-5 MeV which we adjust by the pi- mass. The masses inside the square  brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes P =  -(-1)**J, (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) = 45.01+-0.30+-0.23 MeV, and uses three  relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: S086M
text:
Uses J/psi --> mu+ mu-, phi --> K+ K- decays, and observes 128+-13 events of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi phi.


pdgid: S086DM
text:
The reported result is mass(B_{{s}}()0)-mass(B0) = 87.45+-0.44+-0.09 MeV. We convert it to the mass difference with respect to the average of (mass(B+-) + mass(B0))/2.


pdgid: S086DM
text:
The reported result is mass(B_{{s}}()0)-mass(B+) = 87.52+-0.30+-0.12 MeV. We convert it to the mass difference with respect to the average of (mass(B+-) + mass(B0))/2.


pdgid: S086DM
text:
The reported result is mass(B^0_s()) - mass(B0) = 86.38+-0.90+-0.06 MeV. We convert it to the mass difference with respect to the average of (mass(B+-) + mass(B0))/2.


pdgid: S086T
text:
AALTONEN 2011AP combines the fully reconstrcuted B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+ decays and partially reconstructed B_s()0 --> D_s X decays.


pdgid: S086T
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1998F use fully reconstructed D_s()- --> phi pi- and D_s()- --> K^*()0 K- in the inclusive B_{{s}}()0 decay.


pdgid: S086T
text:
ABREU 1994E uses the flight-distance distribution of D_{{s}} vertices, phi-lepton vertices, and D_s mu vertices.


pdgid: S086GS
text:
Reports width(s) - width(d) = -0.0056+0.0013-0.0015+-0.0014 ps**-1 using a  time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- decays and the current B0  lifetime of 1.517+-0.004 ps**-1.


pdgid: S086GS
text:
Measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays with J/psi --> e+ e-.


pdgid: S086GS
text:
Measured using time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- in the region m(K K) >  1.05 GeV.


pdgid: S086GS
text:
Reports width(s) - width(d) = -0.0041+-0.0024+-0.0015 ps**-1 using a  time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- decays and the B0 lifetime of  1.520+-0.004 ps**-1. The results are further combined with those coming from B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi-,  B_s()0 --> psi(2S) phi, and B_s()0 --> D_s()+ D_s()-.


pdgid: S086GS
text:
Measured using a combined time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- and B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays.


pdgid: S086DGS
text:
Measured using CP eigenstates B_s()0 --> J/psi eta^' and B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi-  (selected to be predominantly CP-odd). Negligible CP violation and width(B_{{s}}()0) =  0.6628+-0.0035 ps**-1 are assumed.


pdgid: S086DGS
text:
AAIJ 2013AR result comes from a combined fit to B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- and B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- data sets. Also reports DeltaGamma(s) = 0.100+-0.016+-0.003 ps**-1 from a fit to B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- decays.


pdgid: S086DGS
text:
Uses the time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays and assuming CP-violating angle beta_{{s}}(B0 --> J/psi phi) = 0.02.


pdgid: S086DGS
text:
Measured using the time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays and assuming CP-violating phase phi(s) = 0.


pdgid: S086DGS
text:
Combines D0 measurements of time-dependent angular distributions in B_s()0 --> J/psi phi and charge asymmetry in semileptonic decays. There is a 4-fold ambiguity in the solution.


pdgid: S086DRA
text:
ACCIARRI 1998S assumes  tau(B_{{s}}()0)= 1.49+-0.06ps and PDG 1998 values of bproduction fraction.


pdgid: S086TSH
text:
Measured using a pure CP-odd final state J/psi K0S with the assumption that contributions from penguin diagrams are small.


pdgid: S086TSH
text:
Measured using B_s --> mu+ mu- decays which, in the Standard Model, correspond to B_{{sH}}()0   decays. Assumes -2 Re(lambda)/(1 + |lambda|**2) = 1.


pdgid: S086TSH
text:
Measured using B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays with 0.9240 < m(pi pi) < 1.0204  GeV, which is dominated by the f_{{0}}(980) resonance, making it a CP-odd state.


pdgid: S086TSH
text:
Measured using J/psi pi+ pi- mode with 0.880 < m(pi pi) < 1.080  GeV/c**2, which is mostly J/psi f(0)(980) mode, a pure CP-odd final state.


pdgid: S086TSH
text:
Measured using B_s --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays which, in the limit of phi_{{s}} = 0 and  |lambda| = 1, correspond to B_{{sH}}()0 decays.


pdgid: S086TSH
text:
Uses the time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays assuming CP-violating angle beta_{{s}}(B0 --> J/psi phi) = 0.02.


pdgid: S086TSL
text:
AAIJ 2023P reports a tau_{{L}} value combined with AAIJ 2016AL result as tau_{{L}} =  1.452+-0.014+-0.007 ps.


pdgid: S086TSL
text:
Measured using results in SIRUNYAN 2018BY for the heavy B_{{s}}()0 lifetime obtained from  B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays and the average effective B_s()0 --> J/psi phi lifetime,  and magnitude squared of the CP-odd amplitude |A((perp))|**2 = 0.250+-0.006.  The uncertainty includes all statistical and systematic contributions.


pdgid: S086TSL
text:
Measured using B_s()0 --> D_s()- D_s()+. The effective lifetime is translated into a decay width of Gamma(L) = 0.725+-0.014+-0.009 ps**-1.


pdgid: S086TFS
text:
AAIJ 2017AN value was measured using B_s()0 --> D_s^(*)()- mu+ nu_mu decays relative to  B0 --> D^(*)()- mu+ nu_mu decays.


pdgid: S086TJF
text:
Based on DeltaGamma = Gamma(H) - Gamma(B0) =  -0.05+-0.004+-0.004 ps**-1 and meanlife(B0) = 1.517+-0.004 ps. The first error is  due to the combined DeltaGamma uncertainty and the second is from meanlife(B0)  uncertainty.


pdgid: S086TMM
text:
Measured using B_s --> mu+ mu- decays which, in the Standard Model, correspond to B_{{sH}}()0  decays. Assumes -2 Re(lambda)/(1 + |lambda|**2) = 1.


pdgid: S086R5
text:
WANG 2022 selects the B_{{s}} events by tagging the accompanying B_{{s}} via partial  reconstruction of the semileptonic decays B_s --> D_s X lepton+ nu.


pdgid: S086R5
text:
The extraction of this result takes into account the correlation between the measurements of B(Upsilon(5S) --> D_s X) and B(Upsilon(5S) --> D0 X).


pdgid: S086R5
text:
BUSKULIC 1996E separate c cbar and b bbar sources of D_{{s}}()+ mesons using a lifetime tag, subtract generic bbar --> W+ --> D_s()+ events, and obtain B(bbar --> B_s()0) * B(B_s()0 --> D_s()- anything) = 0.088+-0.020+-0.020 assuming B(D_s --> phi pi) = 3.5+-0.4E-2 and PDG 1994 values for the relative partial widths to other D_{{s}} channels. We evaluate using our current values B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 0.107+-0.014 and B(D_s --> phi pi) = 0.036+-0.009.  Our first error is their experiment's and our second error is that due to B(bbar --> B_s()0) and B(D_s --> phi pi).


pdgid: S086R5
text:
ACTON 1992N assume that excess of 147+-48 D_{{s}}()0 events over that expected from B0, B+, and c cbar is all from B_{{s}}()0 decay.  The product branching fraction is measured to be B(bbar --> B_s()0)B(B_s()0 --> D_s()- anything)xB(D_s()- --> phi pi-) = 5.9+-1.9+-1.1E-3.


pdgid: S086R54
text:
The measurement corresponds to a branching fraction where the lepton originates from bottom decay and is the average between the electron and muon branching fractions. LEES 2012A uses the correlation of the production of phi mesons in association with a lepton in e+ e- data taken at center-of-mass energies between 10.54 and 11.2 GeV.


pdgid: S086R2
text:
Obtains B_s --> D_s X e nu, and D_s X mu nu separately, then combines them by assuming   systematic uncertainties are fully correlated, except for the one on lepton identification. The   third uncertainty adds in quadrature systematic uncertainties from external sources (number of   B_{{s}} events, and D_{{s}}^(*)() branching fractions). OSWALD 2015 also measures the   cross-section CS(e+ e- --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = 53.8+-1.4+-5.3 pb at sqrt(s) =  10.86  GeV.


pdgid: S086R2
text:
BUSKULIC 1995O use D_s lepton correlations. The measured product branching ratio is B(bbar --> B_s) * B(B_s --> D_s()- lepton+ nu_lepton anything) = (0.82+-0.09+0.13-0.14)% assuming B(D_s --> phi pi) = 3.5+-0.4E-2 and PDG 1994 values for the relative partial widths to the six other D_{{s}} channels used in this analysis. Combined with results from Upsilon(4S) experiments this can be used to extract B(bbar --> B_s) = (11.0+-1.2+2.5-2.6)%. We evaluate using our current values B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 0.107+-0.014 and B(D_s --> phi pi) = 0.036+-0.009.  Our first error is their experiment's and our second error is that due to B(bbar --> B_s()0) and B(D_s --> phi pi).


pdgid: S086R2
text:
We evaluate using our current values B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 0.107+-0.014 and B(D_s --> phi pi) = 0.036+-0.009.  Our first error is their experiment's and our second error is that due to B(bbar --> B_s()0) and B(D_s --> phi pi). We use B(Z --> b  or  bbar) = 2B(Z --> b bbar) = 2*(0.2212+-0.0019).


pdgid: S086R2
text:
ACTON 1992N is measured using D_s --> phi pi+ and K^*(892)0 K+ events. The product branching fraction measured is measured to be B(bbar --> B_s()0)B(B_s()0 --> D_s()- lepton+ nu_lepton anything) xB(D_s^- --> phi pi-) = 3.9+-1.1+-0.8E-4.


pdgid: S086R2
text:
BUSKULIC 1992E is measured using D_s --> phi pi+ and K^*(892)0 K+ events.  They use 2.7+-0.7% for the phi pi+ branching fraction. The average product branching fraction is measured to be B(bbar --> B_s()0)B(B_s()0 --> D_s()- lepton+ nu_lepton anything) =0.020+-0.0055+0.005-0.006.


pdgid: S086S04
text:
Obtains B_s --> D_s^*() X e nu, and D_s^*() X mu nu separately, then combines them by  assuming systematic uncertainties are fully correlated, except for the one on lepton  identification. The third uncertainty adds in quadrature systematic uncertainties from external  sources (number of B_{{s}} events, and D_{{s}}^(*)() branching fractions). OSWALD 2015 also  measures the cross-section CS(e+ e- --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = 53.8+-1.4+-5.3 pb at  sqrt(s) = 10.86 GeV.


pdgid: S086P49
text:
AAIJ 2020E  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()- mu+ nu_mu)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton)] = 1.09+-0.05+-0.06+-0.05 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.10+-0.07E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P50
text:
AAIJ 2020E  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s^*()- mu+ nu_mu)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- lepton+ nu_lepton)] = 1.06+-0.05+-0.07+-0.05 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- lepton+ nu_lepton) = 4.87+-0.09E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R36
text:
ABAZOV 2009G  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s1(2536)- mu+ nu_mu  ,  D_s1()- --> D^*()- K0S)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> B_s()0)] = 2.66+-0.52+-0.45E-4 which we divide by our best value B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 10.0+-0.8E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P54
text:
AAIJ 2021G measures B(B_s()0 --> K- mu+ nu_mu )/B( B_s()0 --> D_s()- mu+ nu_mu  )  = 4.89+-0.21+0.20-0.21+-0.14E-3 over the whole q**2 range, where the last uncertainty  is due to the D_s()- --> K+ K- pi- branching fraction.


pdgid: S086P54
text:
AAIJ 2021G reports this branching ratio for q**2 < 7 GeV**2 as 1.66+-0.08+-0.07+-0.05E-3  and for q**2 > 7 GeV**2 as 3.25+-0.21+0.16-0.17+-0.09E-3.


pdgid: S086P55
text:
The total systematic error includes D_{{s}}()- branching fractions, B_{{s}}()0 lifetime,  |V(cb)|,  and B_s()0 --> D_s()- form factor integral uncertainties.


pdgid: S086R3
text:
AAIJ 2021Y  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- pi+)] = 1.18+-0.04 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.51+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R3
text:
LOUVOT 2009   reports 3.67+0.35-0.33+0.65-0.645E-3 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)())] assuming B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = 19.5+-2.6E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = 20.1+-3.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R3
text:
ABULENCIA 2007C  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- pi+)] = 1.13+-0.08+-0.23 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.51+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R3
text:
AAIJ 2012AG reports 2.95+-0.05+-0.17+0.18-0.22E-3 where the last uncertainty comes from the semileptonic f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} measurement. We combined the systematics in quadrature.


pdgid: S086R3
text:
ABULENCIA 2006J  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- pi+)] = 1.32+-0.18+-0.38 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.51+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R3
text:
AKERS 1994J sees <=6 events and measures the limit on the product branching fraction f(bbar --> B_s()0).B(B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+) < 1.3% at CL = 90%. We divide by our current value B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 0.105.


pdgid: S086R30
text:
ABULENCIA 2007C  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- pi+ pi+ pi-)] = 1.05+-0.10+-0.22 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- pi+ pi+ pi-) = 6.0+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R35
text:
LOUVOT 2009   reports 2.4+1.2-1.0+-0.42E-4 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()-+ K+-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)())] assuming B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = 19.5+-2.6E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = 20.1+-3.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P77
text:
AAIJ 2023AY reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s1(2536)-+ K+-  ,  D_s1()- --> Dbar^*(2007)0 K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-)] = 0.409+-0.019+-0.022 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-) = 6.1+-0.5E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R32
text:
Use Upsilon(5S) --> B_s^*() Bbar_s^*() decays assuming B(Upsilon(5S) --> B_s^*() Bbar_s^*()) = (17.1+-3.0)% and Gamma(Upsilon(5S) --> B_s^*() Bbar_s^*()) / Gamma(Upsilon(5S) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = (87.0+-1.7)%.


pdgid: S086R32
text:
AALTONEN 2012C reports (f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}) (B(B_s()0 --> D_s()+ D_s()-) / B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)) = 0.183+-0.021+-0.017. We multiply this result by our best value of B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) =  and divide by our best value of f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}, where 1/2 f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = . Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best values.


pdgid: S086R32
text:
AALTONEN 2012C  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()+ D_s()-)/G(total)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/[G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)]] / [B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)] = 0.0915+-0.0105+-0.0085 which we multiply or divide by our best values [G(bbar --> B_s()0)]G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.1230+-0.0115, B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = 8.1+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R32
text:
Uses Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^*() Bbar_s^*() assuming B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = (19.3+-2.9)% and Gamma(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^*() Bbar_s^*()) / Gamma(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = (90.1+3.8-4.0)%.


pdgid: S086R32
text:
AALTONEN 2008F  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()+ D_s()-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)] = 1.44+0.48-0.44 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = 8.1+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R73
text:
AAIJ 2014AA reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()- D+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)] = 0.038+-0.004+-0.003 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = 8.1+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P74
text:
AAIJ 2023J  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D^*()+ D^*()-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D^*(2010)+ D^*(2010)-)] = 0.269+-0.032+-0.011+-0.008 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D^*(2010)+ D^*(2010)-) = 8.0+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R33
text:
AAIJ 2016P  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s^*()+ D_s()- + D_s^*()- D_s()+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)] = 1.88+-0.08+-0.12 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = 8.1+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R33
text:
AALTONEN 2012C reports (f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}) (B(B_s()0 --> D_s^*()+ D_s()- + D_s^*()- D_s()+) / B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)) = 0.424+-0.046+-0.035. We multiply this result by our best value of B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) =  and divide by our best value of f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}, where 1/2 f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = . Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best values.


pdgid: S086R33
text:
AALTONEN 2012C  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s^*()+ D_s()- + D_s^*()- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/[G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)]] / [B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)] = 0.212+-0.023+-0.0175 which we multiply or divide by our best values [G(bbar --> B_s()0)]G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.1230+-0.0115, B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = 8.1+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R34
text:
AAIJ 2016P  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s^*()+ D_s^*()-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)] = 1.76+-0.11+-0.14 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = 8.1+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R34
text:
AALTONEN 2012C reports (f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}) (B(B_s()0 --> D_s^*()+ D_s^*()-) / B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)) = 0.654+-0.072+-0.065. We multiply this result by our best value of B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) =  and divide by our best value of f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}, where 1/2 f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = . Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best values.


pdgid: S086R34
text:
AALTONEN 2012C  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s^*()+ D_s^*()-)/G(total)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/[G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)]] / [B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)] = 0.327+-0.036+-0.0325 which we multiply or divide by our best values [G(bbar --> B_s()0)]G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.1230+-0.0115, B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = 8.1+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R23
text:
AAIJ 2016P  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s^(*)()+ D_s^(*)()-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)] = 4.24+-0.14+-0.27 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = 8.1+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R23
text:
AALTONEN 2012C reports (f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}) (B(B_s()0 --> D_s^(*)()+ D_s^(*)()-) / B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)) = 1.261+-0.095+-0.112. We multiply this result by our best value of B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) =  and divide by our best value of f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}, where 1/2 f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = . Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best values.


pdgid: S086R23
text:
AALTONEN 2012C  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s^(*)()+ D_s^(*)()-)/G(total)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/[G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)]] / [B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)] = 0.6305+-0.0475+-0.056 which we multiply or divide by our best values [G(bbar --> B_s()0)]G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.1230+-0.0115, B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = 8.1+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R23
text:
Reports B(B_s()0(short) --> D_s^(*)() D_s^(*)()) = (0.23+-0.10+-0.05) . [0.17/B(D_s --> phi chi)]**2 assuming B(B_s()0 --> B_s()0(short)) = 50%. We use our best value of B(D_s --> phi chi) = 15.7+-1.0% to obtain the quoted result.


pdgid: S086P60
text:
AAIJ 2021S  reports [G(B_s()0 --> D^*()- D_s()+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)] = 0.049+-0.006+-0.0036 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+) = 8.2+-0.8E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P57
text:
AAIJ 2021N  reports [[G(B_s()0 --> D^*()+ D-)/G(total)+ G(B_s()0 --> D^*()- D+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D+- D^*()-+  (CP-averaged))] = 0.137+-0.017+-0.006 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> D+- D^*()-+  (CP-averaged)) = 6.1+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P20
text:
Measured and normalized to the B_s()0 --> Dbar^*()0 K0S decay with f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.259+-0.015.  Signal significance is 4.4 standard deviations.


pdgid: S086R65
text:
AAIJ 2013AQ reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar0 K- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-)] = 1.18+-0.05+-0.12 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-) = 8.8+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P62
text:
AAIJ 2022N  reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar^*(2007)0 K- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+ pi-)] = 1.178+-0.029+-0.091+-0.037 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+ pi-) = 6.2+-2.2E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R52
text:
AAIJ 2011D  reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar0 Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 rho0)] = 1.48+-0.34+-0.19 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 rho0) = 3.21+-0.21E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R52
text:
AAIJ 2013BX reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar0 Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K^*(892)0)] = 7.8+-0.7+-0.3+-0.6 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K^*(892)0) = 4.5+-0.6E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R85
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B_s()0 --> Dbar0 K- pi+ decays. Corresponds to the resonant K_0^*(1430) part of LASS parametrization.


pdgid: S086R91
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B_s()0 --> Dbar0 K- pi+ decays. Corresponds to the non-resonant part of the LASS parametrization.


pdgid: S086R03
text:
AAIJ 2018AZ reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-)] = 0.930+-0.089+-0.069 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-) = 6.1+-0.5E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R03
text:
AAIJ 2012AM reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-)] = 0.90+-0.27+-0.20 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-) = 6.1+-0.5E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P39
text:
AAIJ 2023AZ result's last uncertainty includes the uncertainty of the branching fraction of  B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-) and of f(s)/f(d) ratio.


pdgid: S086P39
text:
AAIJ 2018AY reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar0 phi)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-)] = 3.4+-0.4+-0.3E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-) = 8.8+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P38
text:
AAIJ 2023AZ result's last uncertainty includes the uncertainties of the branching fraction of  B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-) and of f(s)/f(d) ratio.


pdgid: S086P38
text:
AAIJ 2018AY reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar^*()0 phi)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-)] = 4.2+-0.5+-0.4E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-) = 8.8+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P28
text:
The last uncertainty includes the limited knowledge of the external branching fractions where the  eta_{{c}} is reconstructed in the p pbar,K+ K- pi+ pi-, pi+ pi- pi+ pi-, and K+ K- K+ K-  decays and phi(1020) --> K+ K-.


pdgid: S086P29
text:
The last uncertainty includes the limited knowledge of the external branching fractions where the  eta_{{c}} is reconstructed in the p pbar,K+ K- pi+ pi-, pi+ pi- pi+ pi-, and K+ K- K+ K-  decays. The significance of the signal, including systematic uncertainties, is 4.6 standard  deviations.


pdgid: S086R6
text:
AAIJ 2021Y  reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 5.01+-0.16+-0.17E-4 from a measurement of [[G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] assuming B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.003+-0.035E-3, which we rescale to our best values B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2, B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R6
text:
THORNE 2013 uses f(s) = (17.2+-3.0)% as the fraction of Upsilon(5S) decaying to B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)().


pdgid: S086R6
text:
ABE 1996Q  reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)/G(total)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/[G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)]] = 0.185+-0.055+-0.020E-3 which we divide by our best value [G(bbar --> B_s()0)]G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.1230+-0.0115. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R6
text:
AKERS 1994J sees one event and measures the limit on the product branching fraction f(bbar --> B_s()0).B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi) < 7E-4 at CL = 90%. We divide by  B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 0.112.


pdgid: S086R6
text:
In ACTON 1992N a limit on the product branching fraction is measured to be  f(bbar --> B_s()0).B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi) <=0.22E-2.


pdgid: S086R19
text:
KUMAR 2024 uses f(s) = (22.0+2.0-2.1)% as the fraction of Upsilon(5S)  decaying to B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)().


pdgid: S086R20
text:
AAIJ 2013A  reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) eta)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) rho()0)] = 14.0+-1.2+1.1-1.5+1.1-1.0 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) rho()0) = 2.55+0.18-0.16E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R20
text:
Observed for the first time with significances over 10 sigma. The second error are total systematic uncertainties including the error on N(B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()).


pdgid: S086R46
text:
AAIJ 2015AL reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S)] = 4.31+-0.17+-0.12+-0.25E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S) = 4.45+-0.11E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R46
text:
AALTONEN 2011A  reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> B_s()0)] / [B(bbar --> B0)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0)] = 0.545+-0.095+-0.055E-2 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 10.0+-0.8E-2, B(bbar --> B0) = 40.8+-0.7E-2, B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0) = 8.91+-0.21E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R46
text:
AALTONEN 2011A reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> B_s()0)] /  [B(bbar --> B0)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S)] = 1.09+-0.19+-0.11E-2 which we multiply or divide by our best  values B(bbar --> B_s()0) = , B(bbar --> B0) = , B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S) = 1/2 * B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0) = 1/2 * . Our firs t error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from  using our best values.


pdgid: S086R46
text:
AAIJ 2013AB reports 1.97+-0.14+-0.07+-0.15+-0.08E-5 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/G(bbar --> B0)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0) = 8.98+-0.35E-4,[G(bbar --> B_s()0)G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.256+-0.020, which we rescale to our best values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0) = 8.91+-0.21E-4, [G(bbar --> B_s()0)]G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.246+-0.023. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R46
text:
AAIJ 2012O  reports 1.83+-0.21+-0.10+-0.14+-0.07E-5 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/G(bbar --> B0)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0) = 8.71+-0.32E-4,[G(bbar --> B_s()0)G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.267+0.021-0.02, which we rescale to our best values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0) = 8.91+-0.21E-4, [G(bbar --> B_s()0)]G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.246+-0.023. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R47
text:
AAIJ 2015AV result combines two measurements with different normalizing modes of B0 --> J/psi K^*(892)0 and   B_s()0 --> J/psi phi.


pdgid: S086R47
text:
AAIJ 2012AP reports B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) Kbar^*(892)0)/B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 3.43+0.34-0.36+-0.50E-2 and B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.29+-0.05+-0.13E-3 after correcting for the contribution from K pi S-wave beneath the K^*() peak.


pdgid: S086R47
text:
AALTONEN 2011A  reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> B_s()0)] / [B(bbar --> B0)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] = 0.0168+-0.0024+-0.0068 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 10.0+-0.8E-2, B(bbar --> B0) = 40.8+-0.7E-2, B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R01
text:
AAIJ 2013A  reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) eta^')/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) rho()0)] = 12.7+-1.1+0.5-1.3+1.0-0.9 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) rho()0) = 2.55+0.18-0.16E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R02
text:
Strongly correlated with measurements of Gamma()/Gamma  and Gamma()/Gamma  reported in the same reference.


pdgid: S086R04
text:
AAIJ 2012AO reports 19.79+-0.47+-0.52E-2 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] assuming B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 48.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R44
text:
The second error includes both the detector systematic and the uncertainty in the number of produced Y(5S) --> B_s^(*)()  Bbar_s^(*)() pairs.


pdgid: S086R53
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2016Q  reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_0(980)  ,  f_0() --> pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.140+-0.008+-0.023 which we multiply by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R53
text:
AAIJ 2012AO reports 13.9+-0.6+2.5-1.2E-2 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_0(980)  ,  f_0() --> pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] assuming B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 48.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R53
text:
ABAZOV 2012C  reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_0(980)  ,  f_0() --> pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.275+-0.041+-0.061 which we multiply by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R53
text:
AALTONEN 2011AB reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_0(980)  ,  f_0() --> pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.257+-0.020+-0.014 which we multiply by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R53
text:
AAIJ 2011   reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_0(980)  ,  f_0() --> pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.252+0.046-0.032+0.027-0.033 which we multiply by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R05
text:
Measured in Dalitz plot like analysis of B_s --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays for the f_{{2}} helicity state lambda = 0.


pdgid: S086R05
text:
AAIJ 2012AO reports 0.098+-0.033+0.006-0.015E-2 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_2(1270)  ,  f_2() --> pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] assuming B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 48.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R07
text:
AAIJ 2012AO reports 4.19+-0.53+0.12-3.7E-2 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_0(1370)  ,  f_0() --> pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] assuming B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 48.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R06
text:
AAIJ 2012AO reports 1.66+-0.31+0.96-0.08E-2 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-  (nonresonant))/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] assuming B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 48.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R82
text:
Measured with B(B_s()0 --> J/psi K0S pi+ pi-) / B(B0 --> J/psi K0S pi+ pi-) using PDG 2012 values for the involved branching fractions.


pdgid: S086R80
text:
AAIJ 2014L  reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) K0 K- pi+ + c.c.)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0 pi+ pi-)] = 2.12+-0.15+-0.18 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.5+-0.4E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R81
text:
Measured with B(B_s()0 --> J/psi K0S K+ K-)/B(B0 --> J/psi K0S pi+ pi-) using PDG 2012 values for the involved branching fractions.


pdgid: S086R09
text:
ABAZOV 2012AF reports [Gamma(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_2^'(1525))/Gamma(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] x B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) / B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 0.19+-0.05+-0.04 which we divide and multiply by our best values B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) = 1/2, B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R09
text:
ABAZOV 2012AF reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_2^'(1525))/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] * [B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.38+-0.10+-0.08 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8+-2.2E-2, B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R09
text:
AAIJ 2012S reports [26.4+-2.7+-2.4E-2 from a measurement of Gamma(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_2^'(1525))/Gamma(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] x B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) / B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) assuming B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) = 44.4+-1.1E-2, B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 48.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best values B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) = 1/2, B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R09
text:
AAIJ 2012S  reports 26.4+-2.7+-2.4E-2 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_2^'(1525))/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] * [B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] assuming B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8+-2.2E-2,B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 48.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best values B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8+-2.2E-2, B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R60
text:
Measured relative to B_s()0 --> J/psi phi assuming B( B_s()0 --> J/psi phi) = 10.5+-0.13+-0.64E-4 and  taking into account small K+ K- S-wave contribution.


pdgid: S086R00
text:
Branching fractions of normalization modes B_s()0 --> J/psi gamma X taken from PDG 2014.  Uses f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.259+-0.015.


pdgid: S086R79
text:
AAIJ 2014Y  reports 7.14+-0.99+0.83-0.91+-0.41E-5 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_1(1285))/G(total)] * [B(f_1(1285) --> 2pi+ 2pi-)] assuming B(f_1(1285) --> 2pi+ 2pi-) = 0.11+0.007-0.006, which we rescale to our best value B(f_1(1285) --> 2pi+ 2pi-) = 10.9+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R37
text:
AAIJ 2012L  reports 0.489+-0.026+-0.021+-0.012 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) phi)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] / [B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.94+-0.06E-2,B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.72+-0.17E-3, which we rescale to our best values B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2, B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.94+-0.22E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P63
text:
TUMASYAN 2022AI reports [G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) K0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> psi(2S) K0)] = 3.33+-0.69+-0.11+-0.34E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> psi(2S) K0) = 5.8+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086S02
text:
AAIJ 2015U  reports [G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) K- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> psi(2S) K+ pi-)] = 5.38+-0.36+-0.22+-0.31E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> psi(2S) K+ pi-) = 5.8+-0.4E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086S03
text:
AAIJ 2015U  reports [G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> psi(2S) K^*(892)0)] = 5.58+-0.57+-0.40+-0.32E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> psi(2S) K^*(892)0) = 5.9+-0.4E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P52
text:
AAIJ 2021C  reports [G(B_s()0 --> chi_c1(3872) phi)/G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) phi)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] / [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] = 2.42+-0.23+-0.07E-2 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.69+-0.34E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P52
text:
SIRUNYAN 2020BB reports [G(B_s()0 --> chi_c1(3872) phi)/G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) phi)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] / [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] = 2.21+-0.29+-0.17E-2 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.69+-0.34E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P70
text:
AAIJ 2023AP reports [G(B_s()0 --> chi_c1(3872) pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) pi+ pi-)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] / [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] = 6.8+-1.1+-0.2E-2 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.69+-0.34E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P59
text:
AAIJ 2021C reports G(B_s()0 --> J/psi K^*(892)0 Kbar^*(892)0)/G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) phi) B**2(K^*()0 --> K+ pi-)/B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-)/B(phi --> K+ K-)  = 1.22+-0.03+-0.04 which we adjust with PDG 2020 values of B(K^*()0 --> K+ pi-) =  99.902+-0.009E-2, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = 34.68+-0.30E-2, and B(phi --> K+ K-)  = 49.2+-0.5E-2. The first uncertainty is the total experiment's one and the second is due to  the adjustment branching fractions.


pdgid: S086P58
text:
AAIJ 2021C  reports [G(B_s()0 --> chi_c1(3872) ( K+ K- ) _non-phi)/G(B_s()0 --> chi_c1(3872) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 1.57+-0.32+-0.12 which we multiply by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R15
text:
AAIJ 2017G  reports [G(B_s()0 --> pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K+ pi-)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/G(bbar --> B0)] = 9.15+-0.71+-0.83E-3 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.00+-0.04E-5, [G(bbar --> B_s()0)G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.246+-0.023. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R15
text:
AALTONEN 2012L  reports [G(B_s()0 --> pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K+ pi-)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.008+-0.002+-0.001 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.00+-0.04E-5, [G(bbar --> B_s()0)G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.246+-0.023. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R15
text:
AAIJ 2012AR reports [G(B_s()0 --> pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> pi+ pi-)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.050+0.011-0.009+-0.004 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B0 --> pi+ pi-) = 5.37+-0.20E-6, [G(bbar --> B_s()0)G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.246+-0.023. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R15
text:
Uses Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^*() Bbar_s^*() and assumes B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = (19.3+-2.9)% and Gamma(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^*() Bbar_s^*()) / Gamma(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = (90.1+3.8-4.0)%.


pdgid: S086R15
text:
Obtains this result from (f_s/f_d) . B(B_s --> pi+ pi-)/B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 0.007+-0.004+-0.005, assuming f_s/f_d = 0.276+-0.034 and B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.4+-0.6E-6.


pdgid: S086R15
text:
ABULENCIA,A 2006D obtains this from B(B_s --> pi+ pi- ) / B(B_s --> K+ K-) < 0.05 at 90% CL, assuming B(B_s --> K+ K-) = 33+-6+-7E-6.


pdgid: S086P66
text:
Uses Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)() decays and assumes B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)())  =     (20.1+-3.1)%.


pdgid: S086P53
text:
Uses Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^* Bbar_s^* decays and assumes B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)())  =  (20.1+-3.1)%.


pdgid: S086S05
text:
AAIJ 2015O  reports [G(B_s()0 --> eta^' eta^')/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> eta^' K+)] = 0.47+-0.09+-0.04 which we multiply by our best value B(B+ --> eta^' K+) = 7.04+-0.25E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P26
text:
Corresponds to the 95% CL upper limit 1.01E-6. Uses the normalization mode B+ --> eta^' K+  with branching fraction 70.6+-2.5E-6 and the ratio of hadronisation fractions  f(s)/f(d) =0.259+-0.015, which is assumed equal to f(s)/f(u).


pdgid: S086R29
text:
AAIJ 2015AS reports [G(B_s()0 --> phi phi)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 phi)] = 1.84+-0.05+-0.13 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 phi) = 1.00+-0.05E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R29
text:
Uses B(B0 --> J/psi phi) = 1.38+-0.49E-3 and production cross-section ratio of CS(B_{{s}})/CS(B0) = 0.26+-0.04.


pdgid: S086R7
text:
AAIJ 2012AR reports [G(B_s()0 --> pi+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K+ pi-)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.074+-0.006+-0.006 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.00+-0.04E-5, [G(bbar --> B_s()0)G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.246+-0.023. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R7
text:
AALTONEN 2009C  reports [G(B_s()0 --> pi+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K+ pi-)] * [B(bbar --> B_s()0)] / [B(bbar --> B0)] = 0.071+-0.010+-0.007 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.00+-0.04E-5, B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 10.0+-0.8E-2, B(bbar --> B0) = 40.8+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R7
text:
ABULENCIA,A 2006D obtains this from (f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}) (B(B_s --> pi+ K- ) / B(B0 --> K+ pi-)) < 0.08 at 90% CL, assuming f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.260+-0.039 and  B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 18.9+-0.7E-6.


pdgid: S086R8
text:
AAIJ 2012AR reports [G(B_s()0 --> K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K+ pi-)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.316+-0.009+-0.019 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.00+-0.04E-5, [G(bbar --> B_s()0)G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.246+-0.023. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R8
text:
AALTONEN 2011N  reports [G(B_s()0 --> K+ K-)/G(total)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0)]/[G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)]] / [B(B0 --> K+ pi-)] = 0.1735+-0.010+-0.0105 which we multiply or divide by our best values [G(bbar --> B_s()0)]G(bbar --> B+)+ G(bbar --> B0)] = 0.1230+-0.0115, B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.00+-0.04E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R8
text:
AALTONEN 2011N reports (f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}) (B(B_s()0 --> K+ K- ) / B(B0 --> K+ pi-)) = 0.347+-0.020+-0.021. We multiply this result by our best value of B(B0 --> K+ pi-) =  and divide by our best value of f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}, where 1/2 f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = . Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best values.


pdgid: S086R8
text:
ABULENCIA,A 2006D obtains this from (f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}) (B(B_s --> K+ K- ) / B(B0 --> K+ pi-)) = 0.46+-0.08+-0.07, assuming f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.260+-0.039 and  B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 18.9+-0.7E-6.


pdgid: S086R39
text:
AAIJ 2020F  reports [G(B_s()0 --> K0 Kbar0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K0 phi)] = 2.3+-0.4+-0.2+-0.1 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K0 phi) = 7.3+-0.7E-6. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R39
text:
Observed in B_s()0 --> K0S K0S with significance of 5.1 sigma. The last uncertainty is  due to the uncertainty of the total number of B_s()0 Bbar_s()0 pairs.


pdgid: S086R61
text:
AAIJ 2017BP reports [G(B_s()0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)] = 0.191+-0.027+-0.033 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.97+-0.18E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R61
text:
AAIJ 2013BP reports [G(B_s()0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)] = 0.29+-0.06+-0.04 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.97+-0.18E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R62
text:
AAIJ 2017BP reports [G(B_s()0 --> K0 K+- pi-+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)] = 1.70+-0.07+-0.15 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.97+-0.18E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R62
text:
AAIJ 2013BP reports [G(B_s()0 --> K0 K+- pi-+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)] = 1.48+-0.12+-0.14 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.97+-0.18E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R96
text:
AAIJ 2014BM reports [G(B_s()0 --> K^*(892)- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K^*(892)+ pi-)] = 0.39+-0.13+-0.05 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K^*(892)+ pi-) = 7.5+-0.4E-6. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R97
text:
AAIJ 2019K reports 18.6+-1.2+-0.8+-4.0+-2.0E-6 as the measured value. We have combined  in quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.


pdgid: S086R97
text:
AAIJ 2014BM reports [G(B_s()0 --> K^*(892)+- K-+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K^*(892)+ pi-)] = 1.49+-0.22+-0.18 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K^*(892)+ pi-) = 7.5+-0.4E-6. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P43
text:
AAIJ 2019K reports 31.3+-2.3+-0.7+-25.1+-3.3E-6 as the measured value. We have  combined in quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.


pdgid: S086P44
text:
AAIJ 2019K reports 10.3+-2.5+-1.1+-16.3+-1.1E-6 as the measured value. We have combined  in quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.


pdgid: S086P45
text:
AAIJ 2019K reports 19.8+-2.8+-1.2+-4.4+-2.1E-6 as the measured value. We have combined in  quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.


pdgid: S086P46
text:
AAIJ 2019K reports 33.0+-2.5+-0.9+-9.1+-3.5E-6 as the measured value. We have combined in  quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.


pdgid: S086P47
text:
AAIJ 2019K reports 16.8+-4.5+-1.7+-21.2+-1.8E-6 as the measured value. We have combined  in quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.


pdgid: S086R63
text:
AAIJ 2017BP also set the limit range 4 -- 25E-7 at 90% CL using the world  average value B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.96+-0.20E-5.


pdgid: S086R63
text:
AAIJ 2017BP reports [G(B_s()0 --> K0 K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)] = 0.026+-0.011+-0.007 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.97+-0.18E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R63
text:
AAIJ 2013BP reports [G(B_s()0 --> K0 K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)] < 0.068 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.97E-5.


pdgid: S086R26
text:
AAIJ 2015AF reports [G(B_s()0 --> Kbar^*(892)0 K^*(892)0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 phi)] = 1.11+-0.22+-0.12+-0.06 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 phi) = 1.00+-0.05E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R26
text:
Uses B0 --> J/psi K^*()0 for normalization and assumes B(B0 --> J/psi K^*()0) B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) B(K^*()0 --> K+ pi-) = 1.33+-0.06E-3 and f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.253+-0.031. The second quoted error is total uncertainty including the error of 0.34 on f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}.


pdgid: S086R28
text:
AAIJ 2013BW reports [G(B_s()0 --> phi K^*(892)0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 phi)] = 0.113+-0.024+-0.016 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 phi) = 1.00+-0.05E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R16
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.6+-0.5E-6 and B production ratio  f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.2539+-0.0079.


pdgid: S086R16
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.6+-0.5E-6 and B production ratio  f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.259+-0.015.


pdgid: S086R16
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.55+-0.54E-6 and B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.256+-0.020.


pdgid: S086P30
text:
AAIJ 2017BD reports [G(B_s()0 --> p pbar K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-)] = 1.67+-0.12+-0.11 which we multiply by our best values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3, B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-) = 99.902+-0.009E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P31
text:
AAIJ 2017BD reports [G(B_s()0 --> p pbar K+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-)] = 0.52+-0.08+-0.05 which we multiply by our best values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3, B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-) = 99.902+-0.009E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P33
text:
Reports B(B_s()0 --> p pbar K+ pi-) / B(B0 --> p pbar K+ pi-) = 0.22+-0.04+-0.02+-0.01, where  the third error is due to f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}.


pdgid: S086P32
text:
AAIJ 2017BD reports [G(B_s()0 --> p pbar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-)] = 0.16+-0.07+-0.02 which we multiply by our best values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3, B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-) = 99.902+-0.009E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P75
text:
AAIJ 2023AD reports 2.3+-1.0+-0.2+-0.1E-8 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> p pbar p pbar)/G(total)] / [B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] assuming B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi) = 1.04+-0.04E-3,B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 0.491+-0.005,B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3, which we rescale to our best values B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi) = 1.03+-0.04E-3, B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P25
text:
AAIJ 2017AL value represents the sum of B_s()0 --> p Lambdabar K- and B_s()0 --> pbar Lambda K+  and assumes the fraction f(s)/f(d) = 0.259+-0.015.


pdgid: S086P25
text:
AAIJ 2017AL reports 5.46+-0.61+-0.82E-6 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> p Lambdabar K- + c.c.)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> p Lambdabar pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> p Lambdabar pi-) = 3.14+-0.29E-6, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> p Lambdabar pi-) = 3.16+-0.24E-6. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R69
text:
The second error is the total systematic uncertainty including the Lambda_{{c}} absolute branching fractions and the normalizion number of B_{{s}} events.


pdgid: S086R17
text:
Assumes the fraction of B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)() in b bbar events is f_{{s}} = (17.2+-3.0)%. The systematic uncertainty from f_{{s}} is 0.6E-5.


pdgid: S086R17
text:
AAIJ 2013   reports [G(B_s()0 --> phi gamma)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 gamma)] = 0.81+-0.04+-0.07 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 gamma) = 4.18+-0.25E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R17
text:
Measures B(B0 --> K^*()0 gamma)/B(B_s --> phi gamma) = 1.12+-0.08(stat)+0.06(sys)+0.09(f_{{s}}/f_{{d}})  and uses current world-average value of B(B0 --> K^*()0 gamma) = 4.33+-0.15E-5.


pdgid: S086P84
text:
AAIJ 2024S reports [Gamma(B_s()0 --> f_2(1270) gamma)/Gamma(B_s()0 --> phi gamma)]  x B(f_2(1270) --> K+ K-) / B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 1.2+0.4-0.3+0.3-0.5% which  we divide and multiply by our best values B(f_2(1270) --> K+ K-) = 1/2,  B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = . Our first error is their experiment's error and our  second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P84
text:
AAIJ 2024S  reports [G(B_s()0 --> f_2(1270) gamma)/G(B_s()0 --> phi gamma)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> K Kbar)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 2.4+0.8-0.6+0.6-1.0 % which we multiply or divide by our best values B(f_2(1270) --> K Kbar) = 4.6+-0.4E-2, B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P85
text:
AAIJ 2024S reports [Gamma(B_s()0 --> f_2^'(1525) gamma)/Gamma(B_s()0 --> phi gamma)]  x B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) / B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 17.3+0.8-0.7+1.3-0.5%  which we divide and multiply by our best values B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) = 1/2,  B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = . Our first error is their experiment's error and our  second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P85
text:
AAIJ 2024S  reports [G(B_s()0 --> f_2^'(1525) gamma)/G(B_s()0 --> phi gamma)] * [B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 34.6+1.6-1.4+2.6-1.0 % which we multiply or divide by our best values B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8+-2.2E-2, B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P86
text:
AAIJ 2024S  reports [G(B_s()0 --> phi(1680) gamma  ,  phi --> K+ K-)/G(B_s()0 --> phi gamma)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 5.4+0.9-0.6+1.0-1.1 % which we multiply by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P87
text:
AAIJ 2024S  reports [G(B_s()0 --> phi_3(1850) gamma  ,  phi_3 --> K+ K-)/G(B_s()0 --> phi gamma)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.4+0.3-0.2+0.2-0.2 % which we multiply by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086P88
text:
AAIJ 2024S  reports [G(B_s()0 --> f_2(2010) gamma  ,  f_2 --> K+ K-)/G(B_s()0 --> phi gamma)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.6+0.3-0.2+0.3-0.2 % which we multiply by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3, B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) =  5.961+-0.033E-2 and B production ratio f(b --> B_s()0)/f(b --> B+) = 0.231+-0.008.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.01+-0.03E-3 and B production ratio  f(b --> B_s()0)/f(b --> B+) = 0.252+-0.012+-0.015.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.010+-0.029E-3 and B production ratio   f(b --> B_s()0)/f(b --> B0) = 0.256+-0.013.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
This value corresponds to an upper limit of < 3.0E-9 at 95% C.L. It uses f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.24+-0.02.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Determined from the joint fit to CMS and LHCb data. Uncertainty includes both statistical and systematic component.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.256+-0.020 and two normalization modes:  B(B+ --> J/psi K+--> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.01+-0.21E-5 and B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 1.94+-0.06E-5.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.259+-0.015 and normalization modes B+ --> J/psi K+ --> mu+ mu- K+ and B0 --> K+ pi-.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 10.22+-0.35E-4 and B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.28+-0.04.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B+ --> J/psi K+ --> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.01+-0.21E-5 and B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.263+-0.017.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.256+-0.020 and B(B+ --> J/psi K+ --> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.0+-0.2E-5 for normalization.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B+)/f(bbar --> B_s()0) = 3.75+-0.29 and B(B+ --> J/psi K+ --> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.0+-0.2E-5.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio  f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.267+0.021-0.020 and three normalization modes B(B+ --> J/psi K+--> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.01+-0.21E-5, B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 1.94+-0.06E-5, and B(B_s()0 --> J/psi phi--> mu+ mu- K+ K-) = 3.4+-0.9E-5.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.267+0.021-0.020 and three normalization modes of B+ --> J/psi K+, B0 --> K+ pi-, and B_s()0 --> J/psi phi.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B+)/f(bbar --> B_s()0) = 3.55+-0.47 and B(B+ --> J/psi K+--> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.01+-0.21E-5.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B+)/f(bbar --> B_s()0) = 3.55+-0.42 and B(B+ --> J/psi K+--> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.0+-0.2E-5.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio  f(bbar --> B+)/f(bbar --> B_s()0) = 3.86+-0.59,  and the number of B+ --> J/psi K+ decays.


pdgid: S086P67
text:
The exclusion limit is quoted at 95% CL for the dimuon mass region [3.92 -  mass(B_{{s}}()0)] GeV/c**2. The limits are also reported for other dimuon mass regions:  <4.2E-8 in [2mass(mu) - 1.7] GeV/c**2; <7.7E-8 in [1.70 -- 2.88]  GeV/c**2; <2.8E-8 in [2mass(mu) - 1.7] GeV/c**2 and excluding phi  mass.


pdgid: S086P36
text:
Normalizes to B(B0 --> J/psi K^*()0) = 1.19+-0.01+-0.08% and B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) =  5.96+-0.03%, and uses f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.259+-0.015.


pdgid: S086P16
text:
AAIJ 2015S  reports 8.6+-1.5+-0.7+-0.7E-8 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> pi+ pi- mu+ mu-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.3+-0.1E-3, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S086R22
text:
AAIJ 2018T uses normalization modes B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.6+-0.5E-6 and B(B+ --> J/psi K+) =  1.026+-0.031E-3 with B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) =  0.259+-0.015. The upper limit increases to 6E-9 with the assumption of B_{{L}}-dominated  decay amplitude.


pdgid: S086R22
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.4+-0.6E-6 and B production ratio  f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.256+-0.020.


pdgid: S086P1
text:
AFFOLDER 2000N measurements are based on 40 B_{{s}}()0 candidates obtained from a data sample of 89pb**-1. The P-wave fraction is found to be 0.23+-0.19+-0.04.


pdgid: S086P06
text:
Note: in the summary of AAIJ 2019AP the systematic uncertainty is 0.007. We take the  systematic uncertainty as given in Table 5 in the paper.


pdgid: S086P07
text:
AAIJ 2014AE reports measurement of phi((perp)) and phi((perp))-phi((parallel)), which we convert into phi((parallel)). Statistical uncertainty includes correlation between measured parameters, while systematic uncertainties are assumed uncorrelated.


pdgid: S086P07
text:
AALTONEN 2011AN quotes cos(phi((parallel))) = -0.91+0.15-0.13+-0.09 which we convert to phi((parallel)) taking the smaller solution.


pdgid: S086P07
text:
AAIJ 2012P quotes cos(phi((parallel))) = -0.844+-0.068+-0.029 which we convert to phi((parallel)), taking the smaller solution.


pdgid: S086P11
text:
Measures cos(phi((parallel))) = -0.18+-0.52+-0.29, which we convert to phi((parallel)) by taking the smaller solution.


pdgid: S086D
text:
Significance of oscillation signal is 5.4 sigma. Also reports |V_td / V_ts| = 0.2060+-0.0007+0.0081-0.0060.


pdgid: S086D
text:
A likelihood scan over the oscillation frequency, Delta(m)(s), gives a most probable value of 19ps**-1 and a range of 17<Delta(m)(s)<21(ps**-1) at 90% C.L. assuming Gaussian uncertainties. Also excludes Delta(m)(s)<14.8ps**-1 at 95% C.L


pdgid: S086D
text:
Significance of oscillation signal is 0.2%. Also reported the value |V_td / V_ts| = 0.208+0.001-0.002+0.008-0.006.


pdgid: S086D
text:
Uses leptons emitted with large momentum transverse to a jet and improved techniques for vertexing and flavor-tagging.


pdgid: S086D
text:
ABE 2003 uses the novel ``charge dipole'' technique to reconstruct separate secondary and tertiary vertices originating from the B --> D decay chain. The analysis excludes Deltamass(s)<4.9ps**-1 and 7.9<Deltamass(s)<10.3ps**-1.


pdgid: S086D
text:
Three analyses based on complementary event selections: (1) fully-reconstructed hadronic decays; (2) semileptonic decays with D_{{s}} exclusively reconstructed; (3) inclusive semileptonic decays.


pdgid: S086D
text:
ABE 2002V uses exclusively reconstructed D_{{s-}} mesons and excludes Deltamass(s)<1.4ps**-1 and 2.4<Deltamass(s)<5.3ps**-1 at 95%CL.


pdgid: S086D
text:
Replaced by ABDALLAH 2004A. Uses D_s()- lepton+, and phi lepton+ vertices, and a multi-variable discriminant as a flavor tagging.


pdgid: S086D
text:
Uses inclusive D_{{s}} vertices and fully reconstructed B_{{s}} decays  and a multi-variable discriminant as a flavor tagging.


pdgid: S086D
text:
BARATE 1998C combines results from D_s h-lepton/Q(hem), D_s h-K in the same side, D_s lepton-lepton/Q(hem) and D_s lepton-K in the same side.


pdgid: S086D
text:
BUSKULIC 1995J uses lepton-Q(hem). They find Deltamass(s)>5.6 [>6.1] for f_{{s}}=10% [12%].  We interpolate to our central value f_{{s}}=10.5%.


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
AAIJ 2016G reports a measurement of time-integrated flavor-specific asymmetry in B_s()0 --> mu+ D_s()- X  decays, A_{{SL}}^s()  = (0.39+-0.26+-0.20)%, which is approximately equal to 4  x Re(epsilon(B_{{s}}()0)) / (1 + |epsilon(B_{{s}}()0) |**2).


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2014 uses the dimuon charge asymmetry with different impact parameters from which it reports A_{{SL}}^s() = -0.86+-0.74E-2.


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2013 reports a measurement of time-integrated flavor-specific asymmetry in mixed semileptonic B_s()0 --> mu+ D_s()- X decays A_{{SL}}^s() = (-1.12+-0.74+-0.17)% which is approximately equal to 4 x Re(epsilon(B_{{s}}()0))/(1 + |epsilon(B_{{s}}()0)|**2).


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
AAIJ 2014D reports a measurement of time-integrated flavor-specific asymmetry in B_s()0 --> mu+ D_s()- X decays, A_{{SL}}^s() = (-0.06+-0.50+-0.36)%, which is approximately equal to4 x  Re(epsilon(B_{{s}}()0)) / (1 + |epsilon(B_{{s}}()0) |**2).


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2011U uses the dimuon charge asymmetry with different impact parameters from which it reports A_{{SL}}^s() = -18.1+-10.6E-3.


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2010E reports a measurement of flavor-specific asymmetry in B_(s)()0 --> mu+ D_(s)^*()- X decays with a decay-time analysis including initial-state flavor tagging, A_{{SL}}^s() = -1.7+-9.1+1.4-1.5E-3 which is approximately equal to 4 x Re(epsilon(B_{{s}}()0)) / (1 + |epsilon(B_{{s}}()0) |**2).


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2010H reports a measurement of like-sign dimuon charge asymmetry of A_{{SL}}^s()  = -9.57+-2.51+-1.46E-3 in semileptonic b-hadron decays. Using the measured production ratio of B_{{d}}()0 and B_{{0}}()0, and the asymmetry of B_{{d}}()0 A_{{SL}}^s() = -4.7+-4.6E-3 measured from B-factories, they obtain the asymmetry for B_{{s}}()0.


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
The first direct measurement of the time integrated flavor untagged charge asymmetry in semileptonic B_{{s}}()0 decays is reported as 2xA_{{SL}}^s()(untagged) = A_{{SL}}^s() = 2.45+-1.93+-0.35E-2.


pdgid: S086ARX
text:
Measured in B_s()0 --> D_s()-+ K+- decays, constraining -2beta_{{s}} by the measurement of  phi_{{s}} = -0.030+-0.033 from HFLAV.


pdgid: S086ARX
text:
Measured in B_s()0 --> D_s()-+ K+- decays, constraining -2beta_{{s}} by the measurement of phi_{{s}} = 0.01+-0.07+-0.0 from AAIJ 2013AR. At 68% CL.


pdgid: S086A28
text:
Measured in restricted phase space with m(K+ pi+ pi-) < 1950 MeV, m(K+ pi-)  < 1200 MeV and m(pi+ pi-) < 1200 MeV.


pdgid: S086A28
text:
A model-independent coherence factor for the decay B_s --> D_s K pi pi (in the restricted phase  space region) is also reported.


pdgid: S086A29
text:
Measured in restricted phase space with m(K+ pi+ pi-) < 1950 MeV, m(K+ pi-)  < 1200 MeV and m(pi+ pi-) < 1200 MeV. The value is modulo 180degree.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2025A reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.086+-0.106+-0.028 rad. in a  time-dependent fit to  B_s()0 --> D_s()+ D_s()-, while allowing CP violation in decay.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2019Q reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.039+-0.022+-0.006 rad. measured  using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAD 2021AE measured phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.087+-0.036+-0.021 rad. using a  time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2021AN measured phi_{{s}} = -2beta_{{s}} = 0.00+-0.28+-0.07 rad, using a   time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays with J/psi --> e+ e-.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
SIRUNYAN 2021E measured phi(s) = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.021+-0.044+-0.010  rad. using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2019AF reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = 0.002+-0.044+-0.012 rad. and  |lambda|= 0.949+-0.036+-0.019, when direct CP violation is allowed. Measured  using a time-dependent fit to B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
Measured phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = 0.119+-0.107+-0.034 rad using time-dependent angular  analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- in the region m(K K) > 1.05 GeV.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAD 2016AP reports phi(s) = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.090+-0.078+-0.041 rad.  that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2016AK reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = 0.23+0.29-0.28+-0.02 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> psi(2S) phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2016S reports phi(s) = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.075+-0.097+-0.031  rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2015I reports phi(s) = -2 beta_{{s}} =  -0.058+-0.049+-0.006 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- decays. It also combines this result with that of AAIJ 2014S and quotes phi(s) = -2 beta_{{s}} =  -0.010+-0.039 rad.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAD 2014U reports phi(s) = -2 beta_{{s}} =  0.12+-0.25+-0.05 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2014AY reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = 0.02+-0.17+-0.02 rad. in a time-dependent fit to  B_s()0 --> D_s()+ D_s()-, while allowing CP violation in decay.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2014S reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = 0.070+-0.068+-0.008 rad. and |lambda|=  0.89+-0.05+-0.01, when direct CP violation is allowed. Measured using a time-dependent fit to B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AALTONEN 2012AJ reports -pi/2 <beta_{{s}}<-1.51 or -0.06<beta_{{s}}< 0.30, or 1.26 <beta_{{s}}<pi/2 rad. at 68% CL.  Measured using the time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
ABAZOV 2012D reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.55+0.38-0.36 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays. A single error includes both statistical and systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2019Q reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.083+-0.041+-0.006 rad. that was  measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2018S reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.10+-0.13+-0.14 rad measured in  B_s()0 --> (K+ pi-) (K- pi+)  in the region 0.75 < m(K+- pi-+) < 1.6 GeV. This  is a b --> d dbar s transition with a decay amplitude phase different from that of b --> c cbar s  transition.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2015K reports -2beta_{{s}} = -0.12+0.14-0.16 rad. The value was obtained by   measuring time-dependent CP asymmetry in B_s()0 --> K+ K- and using a U-spin relation   between B_s()0 --> K+ K- and B0 --> pi+ pi-.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2013AR reports phi_{{s}} = -2beta_{{s}} = 0.01+-0.07+-0.01 rad. obtained from combined fit to B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- and B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- data sets. Also reports separate results of phi_{{s}} = 0.07+-0.09+-0.01 rad. from B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- decays  and phi_{{s}} = -0.14+0.17-0.16+-0.01 rad. from B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAD 2012CV reports phi(s) = -2 beta_{{s}} =  0.22+-0.41+-0.10 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
Reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.44+-0.44+-0.02 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent fit to B_s()0 --> J/psi f_0(980) decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
Reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = 0.15+-0.18+-0.06 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
Reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.019+0.173-0.174+0.004-0.003 rad. which was measured using a time-dependent fit  to B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays, with the pi+ pi- mass within 775 -- 1550 MeV. Searches for, but finds no evidence, for direct CP violation in B_s()0 --> J/psi pi pi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
Reports 0.02 < phi_{{s}}< 0.52 or 1.08 < phi_{{s}}< 1.55 rad. at 68% C.L. confidence regions in the two-dimensional space of phi_{{s}} and Deltawidth(B_{{s}}()0) from B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
confidence regions in the two-dimensional space of 2beta_{{s}} and DeltaGamma from the first measurement of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays using flavor tagging. The probability of a deviation from SM prediction as large as the level of observed data is 15%.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
Combines D0 collaboration measurements of time-dependent angular distributions in B_s()0 --> J/psi phi and charge asymmetry in semileptonic decays. There is a 4-fold ambiguity in the solution.


pdgid: S086PBS
text:
AAIJ 2023AT also reports polarisation-dependent results assuming that the longitudinal weak  phase is CP-conserving and that there is no direct CP violation.


pdgid: S086PBS
text:
AAIJ 2023AT reports phi(s)**s sbar s = -0.074+-0.069 rad and  |lambda| = 1.009+-0.030. Measured using a time-dependent fit to B_s()0 --> phi phi  decays, assuming independence of the helicity of the phi phi decay.


pdgid: S086PBS
text:
Measured using a time-dependent fit to B_s()0 --> phi phi decays, assuming independence of the  helicity of the phi phi decay.


pdgid: S086PBS
text:
AAIJ 2019AP reports also polarisation-dependent results assuming that the longitudinal weak phase is CP-conserving and that there is no direct CP violation, giving phi( s,(parallel))**s sbar s = 0.014+-0.055+-0.011 rad and phi( s,(perp))**s sbar s  = 0.044+-0.059+-0.019 rad.


pdgid: S086PBS
text:
AAIJ 2019AP reports phi(s)**s sbar s = -0.073+-0.115+-0.027 rad and  |lambda|= 0.99+-0.05+-0.01. Measured using a time-dependent fit to B_s()0 --> phi phi  decays, assuming independence of the helicity of the phi phi decay.


pdgid: S086PBS
text:
AAIJ 2014AE value measured in B_s()0 --> phi phi decays. Also reports phi(s)**s sbar s = -0.17+-0.15+-0.03 rad.


pdgid: S086PBS
text:
AAIJ 2013AY uses B_s()0 --> phi phi mode, and reports the 68% CL interval of phi(s)**s sbar s = -2 beta(s)**s sbar s  as [-2.46, -0.76] rad.


pdgid: S086LAM
text:
Measured using time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- in the region m(K K) in the  vicinity of the phi(1020) resonance.


pdgid: S086A07
text:
Measured in flavor tagged time dependent analysis, using tagged and un-tagged events. This result  updates AAIJ 2017B with better selection efficiency and other analysis improvements.


pdgid: S086CT1
text:
Measured in semileptonic B_s()0 --> D_s()- mu+ X decays. Also extracts limit on time and longitudinal components ( -0.8 < Deltaa(T) - 0.396 Deltaa_{{Z}} < 3.9 ) E-13 GeV.


pdgid: S086PAX
text:
Based on time-dependent analysis of B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+ in kinematic range 2 < pT  < 30 GeV/c and 2.1 <eta < 4.5.


pdgid: S086PAX
text:
Based on time-dependent analysis of B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+ in kinematic range 4 < pT < 30 GeV/c and 2.5 <eta < 4.5.


pdgid: S086A27
text:
The B_s()0 --> D_s^*()- mu+ nu_mu decay is reconstructed through the decays of D_s^*()- --> D_s()- gamma,  D_s()- --> K- K+ pi-.


pdgid: S086A27
text:
The B_s()0 --> D_s^*()- mu+ nu_mu decay is reconstructed inclusively without gamma from the  decays of D_s^*()- --> D_s()- gamma, D_s()- --> K- K+ pi-.


pdgid: S087M
text:
Utilized the beam constrained invariant mass peak positions for B^* and B^*_s to extract the measurement.


pdgid: S087M
text:
Uses 14 candidates consistent with B_{{s}} decays into final states with a J/psi and a D_{{s}}^{(*)-}().


pdgid: S087DM
text:
Utilized the beam constrained invariant mass peak positions for B^* and B_{{s}}^* to extract the measurement.


pdgid: S087DM
text:
LEE-FRANZINI 1990 measure 46.7+-0.4+-0.2 MeV for an admixture of B0, B+, and B_{{s}}. They use the shape of the photon line to separate the above value for B_{{s}}.


pdgid: M187M
text:
Uses two-body decays into K- and B+ mesons reconstructed as B+ --> J/psi K+, J/psi --> mu+ mu- or B+ --> Dbar0 pi+, Dbar0 --> K+ pi-.


pdgid: M187DM
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{s1}}(5830)0) - mass(B^*()+) - mass(K-) = 10.35+-0.12+-0.15 MeV which we adjusted by the K- mass.


pdgid: M187R00
text:
With the branching fractions B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.026+-0.031E-3 and B(B0 --> J/psi K^*()0) =  1.28+-0.05E-3.


pdgid: M186M
text:
Observed in B_s2^*()0 --> B+ K-.  Measured production rate of B_{{s2}}^*()0 relative to B+ to be (1.15+-0.23+-0.13)%.


pdgid: M186DM2
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{s2}}(5840)0) - mass(B+) - mass(K-) = 66.73+-0.13+-0.14 MeV which we adjusted by the K- mass.


pdgid: S091M
text:
AAIJ 2020R uses the B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+, J/psi pi+ pi- pi+, J/psi p pbar pi+,  J/psi D_s()+, J/psi D0 K+ and B_s()0 pi+ modes.


pdgid: S091M
text:
AAIJ 2012AV uses the B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+ mode and also measures the mass difference M(B_{{c}}()+) - M(B+) = 994.6+-1.3+-0.6 MeV/c**2.


pdgid: S091M
text:
ABE 1998M observed 20.4+6.2-5.5 events in the B_c()+ --> J/psi(1s) lepton nu_lepton with a significance of >4.8 standard deviations.  The mass value is estimated from m(J/psi(1S) lepton).


pdgid: S091M
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1998O observed 2 candidate events in the B_c()+ --> J/psi(1S) pi+ channel with an estimated background of 0.63+-0.20 events.


pdgid: S091T
text:
Also measures the width difference DeltaGamma = width(B_{{c}}()+)- width(B+) = 4.46+-0.14+-0.07 mm**-1c.


pdgid: S091R1
text:
AALTONEN 2016A  reports [G(B_c()+ --> J/psi(1S) lepton+ nu_lepton anything)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] = 0.211+-0.012+0.021-0.020 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8+-0.7E-2, B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S091R1
text:
AALTONEN 2016A also measures the cross-section CS(B_{{c}}) *B(B_c --> J/psi mu nu_mu) =  0.60+-0.09 nb and estimates the total cross-section CS(B_{{c}}) to be in the range 25+-4 to  52+-8 nb for p_{{T}}(B_{{c}}) > 6 GeV/c and |y(B_{{c}})| < 1.


pdgid: S091R1
text:
ABE 1998M result is derived from the measurement of [sigma(B_{{c}})*B(B_c --> J/psi(1S) lepton nu_lepton)] / [sigma(B+)*B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] = 0.132+0.041-0.037(stat)+-0.031(sys)+0.032(lifetime) by using PDG 1998 values of B(b --> B+) and B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+).


pdgid: S091R1
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1998O reports B(Z --> B_c X)/B(Z --> q q)*B(B_c --> J/psi(1S) lepton nu_lepton) <6.95E-5 at 90%CL. We rescale to our PDG 1998 values of B(Z --> b bbar).


pdgid: S091R1
text:
ABREU 1997E value listed is for an assumed tau(B_{{c}}) = 0.4ps and improves to 1.6E-4 for tau(B_{{c}}) = 1.4ps.


pdgid: S091R1
text:
BARATE 1997H reports B(Z --> B_c X)/B(Z --> q q).B(B_c --> J/psi(1S) lepton nu_lepton) <5.2E-5 at 90%CL. We rescale to our PDG 1996 values of B(Z --> b bbar). A B_c()+ --> J/psi(1S) mu+ nu_mu candidate event is found, compared to all the known background sources 2E-3, which gives mass(B_{{c}}) = 5.96+0.25-0.19 GeV and tau(B_{{c}}) = 1.77+-0.17ps.


pdgid: S091R2
text:
AABOUD 2021 reports a measurement of B(B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+) / B(B+ --> J/psi K+)   . f_{{c}}/f_{{u}} = (0.34+-0.04+0.06-0.02+-0.01) %, at  pT > 13  GeV and |y| < 2.3.


pdgid: S091R2
text:
AAIJ 2015M reports a measurement of B(B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+) / B(B+ --> J/psi K+) . f_{{c}}/f_{{u}} = (0.683+-0.018+-0.009)% at p_{{T}}(B) < 20 GeV and 2.0 < y(B) < 4.5.


pdgid: S091R2
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2015AA reports a measurement of  B(B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+) / B(B+ --> J/psi K+) . f_{{c}}/f_{{u}} = (0.48+-0.05+-0.03+-0.05)%, at pT > 15 GeV and |eta(B)| < 1.6.


pdgid: S091R2
text:
AAIJ 2012AV reports a measurement of B(B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+)/B(B+ --> J/psi K+) f_{{c}}/f_{{u}} = (0.68+-0.10+-0.03+-0.05)% at pT(B) > 4 GeV and 2.5 < eta(B) < 4.5.


pdgid: S091R2
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1998O reports B(Z --> B_c X)/B(Z --> q q)*B(B_c --> J/psi(1S) pi+) <1.06E-4 at 90%CL. We rescale to our PDG 1998 values of B(Z --> b bbar).


pdgid: S091R2
text:
ABREU 1997E value listed is for an assumed tau(B_{{c}}) = 0.4ps and improves to 2.7E-4 for tau(B_{{c}}) = 1.4ps.


pdgid: S091R2
text:
BARATE 1997H reports B(Z --> B_c X)/B(Z --> q q).B(B_c --> J/psi(1S) pi) <3.6E-5 at 90%CL. We rescale to our PDG 1996 values of B(Z --> b bbar).


pdgid: S091R2
text:
ABE 1996R reports B(b --> B_c X)/B(b --> B+ X).B(B_c()+ --> J/psi(1S) pi+)/B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) <0.053 at 95%CL for tau(B_{{c}}) = 0.8ps. It changes from 0.15 to 0.04 for 0.17ps<tau(B_{{c}})<1.6ps. We rescale to our PDG 1996 values of B(b --> B+) = 0.378+-0.022 and B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 0.00101+-0.00014.


pdgid: S091R17
text:
AAIJ 2014W reports also a measurement B(B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+) / B(B_c()+ --> J/psi mu+ nu_mu) = 0.271+-0.016+-0.016 in the region mass(J/psi mu+) > 5.3 GeV.


pdgid: S091R4
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1998O reports B(Z --> B_c X)/B(Z --> q q)*B(B_c --> J/psi(1S) a_1(1260)) <5.29E-4 at 90%CL. We rescale to our PDG 1998 values of B(Z --> b bbar).


pdgid: S091R03
text:
A signal yield of 78+-14 decays is reported with a significance of 6.2 standard deviations using an integrated luminosity of 3 fb**-1 data.


pdgid: S091R69
text:
AAIJ 2024F  reports [G(B_c()+ --> J/psi(1S) D_s()+)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] = 1.63+-0.15+-0.13E-5 which we multiply by our best value B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S091R11
text:
The last uncertainty includes the uncertainties on the branching fractions of the leptonic  J/psi and psi(2S) decays (+-0.005).


pdgid: S091R11
text:
The last uncertainty is due to the uncertainty of the B(psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-)/B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) ratio measurement.


pdgid: S091R23
text:
AAIJ 2016AT reports [G(B_c()+ --> chi_c0() pi+)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] * [[G(bbar --> B+)/G(total)] = 9.8+3.4-3.0+-0.8E-6 which we divide by our best value [G(bbar --> B+)/G(total) = 0.408+-0.007. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S091R66
text:
The last uncertainty includes the knowledge of the chi_c2 --> J/psi gamma branching fraction  (+-0.01).


pdgid: S091R00
text:
Measures the ratio (f_{{c}}/f_{{u}}) x B(B_c()+ --> p pbar pi+) < 3.6E-8  at 95% CL, in the region m(p pbar) < 2.85 GeV/c**2, where f_{{c}}  (f_{{u}}) represents the fragmentation fraction of the b-quark into the B_{{c}}()+ (B_{{u}}()+)  meson.


pdgid: S091R25
text:
AAIJ 2017AG reports [G(B_c()+ --> D0 K+)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] = 9.3+2.8-2.5+-0.6E-7 which we multiply by our best value B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S091R26
text:
AAIJ 2017AG reports [G(B_c()+ --> D0 pi+)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] < 3.9E-7 which we multiply by our best value B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R27
text:
AAIJ 2017AG reports [G(B_c()+ --> D^*()0 pi+)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] < 1.1E-6 which we multiply by our best value B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R28
text:
AAIJ 2017AG reports [G(B_c()+ --> D^*()0 K+)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] < 1.1E-6 which we multiply by our best value B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R30
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ Dbar0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 0.9E-3 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R31
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ D0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 3.7E-4 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R32
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D+ Dbar0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 1.9E-2 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R33
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D+ D0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 1.2E-2 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R34
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [[G(B_c()+ --> D_s^*()+ Dbar0)+ G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ Dbar^*(2007)0)]/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 2.8E-3 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R35
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [[G(B_c()+ --> D_s^*()+ D0)+ G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ D^*(2007)0)]/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 3.0E-3 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R5
text:
BARATE 1998Q reports B(Z --> B_c X)*B(B_c --> D^*(2010)+ Dbar0) <1.9E-3 at 90%CL.  We rescale to our PDG 1998 values of B(Z --> b bbar).


pdgid: S091R36
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [[G(B_c()+ --> D^*(2010)+ Dbar0  ,  D^*()+ --> D+ pi0 / gamma)+ G(B_c()+ --> D+ Dbar^*(2007)0)]/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 5.5E-2 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R37
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [[G(B_c()+ --> D^*(2010)+ D0  ,  D^*()+ --> D+ pi0 / gamma)+ G(B_c()+ --> D+ D^*(2007)0)]/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 2.2E-2 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R38
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s^*()+ Dbar^*(2007)0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 1.1E-2 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R39
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s^*()+ D^*(2007)0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 2.0E-2 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R40
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D^*(2010)+ Dbar^*(2007)0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 6.5E-1 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R41
text:
AAIJ 2018P  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D^*(2010)+ D^*(2007)0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 1.3E-1 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R06
text:
AAIJ 2013R  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D+ K^*()0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] < 0.5E-6 which we multiply by our best value B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R07
text:
AAIJ 2013R  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D+ Kbar^*()0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] < 0.4E-6 which we multiply by our best value B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R08
text:
AAIJ 2013R  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ K^*()0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] < 0.7E-6 which we multiply by our best value B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R09
text:
AAIJ 2013R  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ Kbar^*()0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] < 1.1E-6 which we multiply by our best value B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R10
text:
AAIJ 2013R  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ phi)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] < 0.8E-6 which we multiply by our best value B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R02
text:
Derived from Gamma(K+ K0)/GammaxB(bbar --> B_c) / (B(B+ --> K0 pi+) B(bbar --> B+))  < 5.8% at 90% CL  using normalization mode B(B+ --> K0 pi+) = 23.97+-0.53+-0.71E-6 and assuming a B production ratio f(bbar --> B_u()+) = 0.33.


pdgid: S091R64
text:
The B_{{s}}()0 mesons are reconstructed via the decays B_s()0 --> J/psi phi and B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+. The   third uncertainty includes systematic (+-8) and imprecise knowledge of the branching fractions   (+-3).


pdgid: S091R70
text:
AAIJ 2024F  reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ mu+ mu-)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] < 7.5E-8 which we multiply by our best value B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: M217M
text:
AAIJ 2019Y reports mass difference measurement of M(B_{{c}}(2S)+) - M(B_{{c}}()+) =  597.2+-1.3+-0.1 MeV. We have adjusted this measurement with our best value of M(B_{{c}}()+) =  . The first uncertainty of the M(B_{{c}}(2S)+) value is a total of uncertainties  reported by the experiment and the second one comes from our best value of M(B_{{c}}()+).


pdgid: M217M
text:
AAIJ 2019Y observed B_{{c}}(2S)+ in the decay mode B_c(2S)+ --> B_c()+ pi+ pi- (B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+)  with 2.2 (3.2) global (local) standard deviations significance.


pdgid: M217M
text:
AAIJ 2019Y  measures B_{{c}}(2S)+- MASS = ( 597.2+-1.3+-0.1 )  +  1.0 [ B_{{c}}()+ MASS- 0.0 ]  . We have adjusted the measurement to use our best values of   ( B_{{c}}()+ MASS = 6274.47+-0.32 )  . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M217M
text:
SIRUNYAN 2019M reports mass difference measurement of M(B_{{c}}(2S)+) - M(B_{{c}}()+) =  596.1+-1.2+-0.8 MeV. We have adjusted this measurement with our best value of M(B_{{c}}()+) =  . The first uncertainty of the M(B_{{c}}(2S)+) value is a total of uncertainties  reported by the experiment and the second one comes from our best value of M(B_{{c}}()+).


pdgid: M217M
text:
SIRUNYAN 2019M observed B_{{c}}(2S)+ in the decay mode B_c(2S)+ --> B_c()+ pi+ pi-  (B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+) with 6.5 standard deviations significance.


pdgid: M217M
text:
SIRUNYAN 2019M  measures B_{{c}}(2S)+- MASS = ( 596.1+-1.2+-0.8 )  +  1.0 [ B_{{c}}()+ MASS- 0.0 ]  . We have adjusted the measurement to use our best values of   ( B_{{c}}()+ MASS = 6274.47+-0.32 )  . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M217M
text:
AAIJ 2018AL reports an upper limit on the ratio of production cross sections for  [CS(B_{{c}}(2S)+)/CS(B_{{c}}()+)].B(B_c(2S)+ --> B_c()+ pi+ pi-) <  0.04 -- 0.09 at  95% CL for the mass value reported by AAD 2014AQ.


pdgid: M217M
text:
Observed in the decay mode B_c(2S)+ --> B_c()+ pi+ pi- (B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+) with 5.2 standard deviations significance.


pdgid: M217R01
text:
AAIJ 2018AL reports an upper limit on the ratio of production cross sections for  [CS(B_{{c}}(2S)+)/CS(B_{{c}}()+)].B(B_c(2S)+ --> B_c()+ pi+ pi-) <  0.04 -- 0.09 at 95% CL for the mass value reported by AAD 2014AQ.


pdgid: M026M
text:
AAIJ 2020H report mass(J/psi)-mass(eta_{{c}}(1S)) = 113.0+-0.7+-0.1 MeV. We use the  current value mass(J/psi) = 3096.900+-0.006 MeV to obtain the quoted mass.


pdgid: M026M
text:
AAIJ 2017AD report mass(J/psi)-mass(eta_{{c}}(1S)) = 110.2+-0.5+-0.9 MeV. We use the  current value mass(J/psi) = 3096.900+-0.006 MeV to obtain the quoted mass.


pdgid: M026M
text:
From a fit of the phi phi invariant mass with the mass and width of eta_{{c}}(1S) as free  parameters.


pdgid: M026M
text:
AAIJ 2015BI reports mass(J/psi) - mass(eta_{{c}}(1S)) = 114.7+-1.5+-0.1 MeV from a  sample of eta_{{c}}(1S) and J/psi produced in b-hadron decays. We have used current value  of mass(J/psi) = 3096.900+-0.006 MeV to arrive at the quoted mass(eta_{{c}}(1S)) result.


pdgid: M026M
text:
MITCHELL 2009 observes a significant asymmetry in the lineshapes of psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c and J/psi --> gamma eta_c transitions. If ignored, this asymmetry could lead to significant bias whenever the mass and width are measured in psi(2S) or J/psi radiative decays.


pdgid: M026W
text:
From a fit to the 4-prong invariant mass in psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c and J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c decays.


pdgid: M026W1
text:
Calculated by us using Gamma(eta_c --> K Kbar pi)  x Gamma(eta_c --> gamma gamma) / Gamma = 0.44+-0.05 keV from PDG 2006 and B(eta_c --> K Kbar pi) = (8.5+-1.8)% from AUBERT 2006E.


pdgid: M026W1
text:
Normalized to the sum of B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+), B(eta_c --> phi phi), B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi+ pi-), and B().


pdgid: M026W1
text:
Normalized to the sum of B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+), B(eta_c --> 2K+ 2K-), B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi+ pi-), and B().


pdgid: M026G14
text:
Calculated by us from the value reported in ASNER 2004 that assumes B(eta_c() --> K Kbar pi) = 5.5+-1.7%


pdgid: M026G14
text:
Calculated by us from the value reported in ABDALLAH 2003J, which uses B(eta_c --> K0S K+- pi-+) = (1.5+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M026G15
text:
Calculated by us from the value reported in ABDALLAH 2003J, which uses B(eta_c --> pi+ pi- K+ K-) = (2.0+-0.7)%.


pdgid: M026G27
text:
Calculated by us from the value reported in ABDALLAH 2003J, which uses B(eta_c --> ) 2(K+ K-) = (2.1+-1.2)%.


pdgid: M026R55
text:
Based on Dalitz-plot analysis of the eta_c --> eta^' K+ K-, eta^' pi+ pi- final states  where the fit fractions and relative phases are determined for numerous two-body intermediate  states.


pdgid: M026R63
text:
ABLIKIM 2021C  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> eta^'(958) eta eta)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 4.86+-0.62+-0.45E-5 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R9
text:
ABLIKIM 2005L  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> rho rho)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.6+-0.6+-0.4E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R9
text:
BISELLO 1991   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> rho rho)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 3.30+-0.30+-0.60E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R9
text:
BISELLO 1991   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> rho rho)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 3.0+-1.3+-0.6E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R16
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K^*(892)0 K- pi+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 2.6+-0.6E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R25
text:
ABLIKIM 2006A  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar^*(892)0 pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.91+-0.64+-0.48E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R21
text:
Using B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 1.25+-0.12+0.10-0.12E-3 from FANG 2003 and B(eta_c --> K Kbar pi) = 5.5+-1.7E-2.


pdgid: M026R26
text:
ABLIKIM 2006A  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> phi 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 0.603E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41E-2.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AP quotes B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0) = 1.15+-0.12+-0.10E-2 which we  multiply by 6 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AP quotes B(eta_c --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 2.60+-0.21+-0.20E-2 which we  multiply by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 27.24+-4.56+-2.88E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N quotes B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c) . B(h_c --> gamma eta_c) .  B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0) = 4.54+-0.76+-0.48E-6 which we multiply by 6 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 34.05+-3.75+-4.50E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N quotes B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c) . B(h_c --> gamma eta_c) .  B(eta_c --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 11.35+-1.25+-1.50E-6 which we multiply by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
Determined from the ratio of B(B+- --> K+- eta_c) B(eta_c --> K Kbar pi) = 7.4+-0.5+-0.7E-5 reported in AUBERT,B 2004B and B(B+- --> K+- eta_c) = 8.7+-1.5E-3 reported in AUBERT 2006E.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BAI 2004   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 6.6+-0.9+-1.5E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BAI 2004 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c) . B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+) =    2.2+-0.3+-0.5E-4 which we  multiply  by  3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BISELLO 1991   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 8.76+-1.80+-1.68E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BISELLO 1991 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c) . B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0) =     1.46+-0.30+-0.28E-4 which we  multiply  by  6 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BISELLO 1991   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 6.9+-1.2+-1.2E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BISELLO 1991 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c) . B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+) =   2.3+-0.4+-0.4E-4     which we  multiply  by  3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
The quoted branching ratios use B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 0.0127+-0.0036. Where relevant, the error in this branching ratio is treated as a common systematic in computing averages.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 7.8+-3.0E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c) . B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0) =     1.3+-0.5E-4 which we multiply by 6 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c) . B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+) =    1.9+-0.5E-4 which we  multiply by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 5.7+-1.5E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
HIMEL 1980B  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 4.5+2.4-1.8E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 3.6+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R15
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N quotes B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c) . B(h_c --> gamma eta_c) .  B(eta_c --> K+ K- eta) = 2.11+-1.01+-0.32E-6 which we multiply by 2 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R15
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 4.22+-2.02+-0.64E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R40
text:
LEES 2014E reports B(eta_c(1S) --> K+ K- eta)/B(eta_c(1S) --> K+ K- pi0) = 0.571+-0.025+-0.051, which we divide by 3 to account for isospin symmetry. It uses both eta --> gamma gamma and eta --> pi+ pi- pi0 decays.


pdgid: M026R6
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 7.22+-1.47+-1.11E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R05
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> eta 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 19.17+-3.77+-3.72E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R01
text:
We have multiplied the value of Gamma(K+ K- pi+ pi- pi0)/Gamma(K0S K()+- pi()-+) reported in DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011M by a factor 1/3 to obtain . Not independent from other measurements reported in DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011M.


pdgid: M026R06
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N quotes B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c) . B(h_c --> gamma eta_c) .  B(eta_c --> K0S K- pi- 2pi+) = 12.01+-2.22+-2.04E-6 which we multiply by 2 to take c.c. into account.


pdgid: M026R06
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K0 K- pi+ pi- pi+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 24.02+-4.44+-4.08E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R23
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K+ K- 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 3.60+-1.71+-0.64E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R23
text:
ABLIKIM 2006A  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K+ K- 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.21+-0.32+-0.24E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R51
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AJ reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 1.6E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 3.6E-3.


pdgid: M026R07
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 20.31+-2.20+-3.33E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R08
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> 2(pi+ pi- pi0))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 75.13+-7.42+-9.99E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R24
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 8.82+-1.57+-1.59E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R24
text:
ABLIKIM 2006A  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 2.59+-0.32+-0.47E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R2
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 0.65+-0.19+-0.10E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R2
text:
WU 2006   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> eta_c K+)] = 1.42+-0.11+0.16-0.20E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 1.10+-0.07E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R2
text:
BAI 2004   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.9+-0.3+-0.3E-5 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R2
text:
BISELLO 1991   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 0.13+-0.04+-0.03E-4 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R2
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.4+-0.7E-5 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R2
text:
HIMEL 1980B  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 8+8-4E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 3.6+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R09
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.53+-0.49+-0.23E-6 which we divide by our best values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 60+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M026R53
text:
LU 2019   reports 2.83+0.36-0.34+-0.35E-3 from a measurement of [G(eta_c(1S) --> K+ pbar Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> eta_c K+)] assuming B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 9.6+-1.1E-4, which we rescale to our best value B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 1.10+-0.07E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R54
text:
LU 2019   reports 3.48+-1.48+-0.46E-3 from a measurement of [G(eta_c(1S) --> Lambdabar(1520) Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> eta_c K+)] assuming B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 9.6+-1.1E-4, which we rescale to our best value B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 1.10+-0.07E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R28
text:
ABLIKIM 2013C  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 3.60+-0.48+-0.31E-5 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R29
text:
ABLIKIM 2013C  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> Xi- Xibar+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.51+-0.27+-0.14E-5 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R31
text:
ABLIKIM 2013I  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> gamma gamma)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 4.5+-1.2+-0.6E-6 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R31
text:
ADAMS 2008   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> gamma gamma)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.2+2.7-1.1+-0.3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R31
text:
WICHT 2008   reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> gamma gamma)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> eta_c K+)] = 2.2+0.9-0.7+0.4-0.2E-7 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 1.10+-0.07E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R34
text:
ABLIKIM 2011G  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 1.82E-6 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41E-2.


pdgid: M026R34
text:
ABLIKIM 2006B  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 1.1E-5 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41E-2.


pdgid: M026R35
text:
ABLIKIM 2011G  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 6.0E-7 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41E-2.


pdgid: M026R35
text:
ABLIKIM 2006B  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 0.71E-5 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41E-2.


pdgid: M026R36
text:
ABLIKIM 2006B  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 0.96E-5 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41E-2.


pdgid: M026R37
text:
ABLIKIM 2006B  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 0.53E-5 which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41E-2.


pdgid: M026R37
text:
Using Gamma(gamma gamma)(eta_{{c}}) = 5.3+-0.5 keV. UEHARA 2013 reports  Gamma(gamma gamma)xB(K0S K0S) < 1.6 eV.


pdgid: M026R37
text:
Using Gamma(gamma gamma)(eta_{{c}}) = 5.3+-0.5 keV. UEHARA 2013 reports  Gamma(gamma gamma)xB(K0S K0S) < 0.29 eV.


pdgid: M026R64
text:
The value reported by BALTRUSAITIS 1986 has been multiplied by 3/2 to account for isospin  symmetry.


pdgid: M026R73
text:
BAI 2004 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c) . B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+) =  2.2+-0.3+-0.5E-4 which we multiply by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R73
text:
BISELLO 1991 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c) . B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0) =  1.46+-0.30+-0.28E-4 which we multiply by 6 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R73
text:
BISELLO 1991 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c) . B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+) = 2.3+-0.4+-0.4E-4  which we multiply by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R73
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c) . B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0) =  1.3+-0.5E-4 which we multiply by 6 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R73
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c) . B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+) =  1.9+-0.5E-4 which we multiply by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R74
text:
VINOKUROVA 2011 reports B(B+ --> eta_c K+ , eta_c --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 26.7+-1.4+2.9-2.6+-4.9E-6,  where the first uncertainty is   statistical, the second is due to systematics, and the third comes  from interference of   eta_c(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+ with nonresonant K0S K+- pi-+. We  combined both systematic uncertainties to single values. We multiply the reported result by 3 to  account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N quotes B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c) . B(h_c --> gamma eta_c)  . B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0) = 4.54+-0.76+-0.48E-6 which we multiply by 6 to  account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 27.24+-4.56+-2.88E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N quotes B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c) . B(h_c --> gamma eta_c)  . B(eta_c --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 11.35+-1.25+-1.50E-6 which we multiply by 3 to  account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 34.05+-3.75+-4.50E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R77
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N quotes B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c) . B(h_c --> gamma eta_c)  . B(eta_c --> K+ K- eta) = 2.11+-1.01+-0.32E-6 which we multiply by 2 to  account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R77
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar eta)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 4.22+-2.02+-0.64E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R78
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 7.22+-1.47+-1.11E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R81
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> eta 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 19.17+-3.77+-3.72E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R83
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K+ K- pi+ pi-)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 4.16+-0.76+-0.59E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N quotes B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c) . B(h_c --> gamma eta_c)  . B(eta_c --> K0S K- pi- 2pi+) = 12.01+-2.22+-2.04E-6 which we multiply by 2  to take c.c. into account.


pdgid: M026R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K0 K- pi+ pi- pi+ + c.c.)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 24.02+-4.44+-4.08E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R87
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K+ K- 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 3.60+-1.71+-0.64E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R89
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> 2(K+ K-))/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 0.94+-0.37+-0.14E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R91
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0 pi0)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 20.31+-2.20+-3.33E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R92
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 7.51+-0.85+-1.11E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R95
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> 2(pi+ pi- pi0))/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 75.13+-7.42+-9.99E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R96
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 8.82+-1.57+-1.59E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026R98
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 0.65+-0.19+-0.10E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026P02
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 1.53+-0.49+-0.23E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M026P07
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N  reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 2.30+-0.65+-0.36E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070M
text:
Reanalysis of ZHOLENTZ 1980 using new electron mass (COHEN 1987) and radiative corrections (KURAEV 1985).


pdgid: M070M
text:
Mass central value and systematic error recalculated by us according to Eq.(16) in ARMSTRONG 1993B, using the value for the psi(2S) mass from AULCHENKO 2003.


pdgid: M070M
text:
From a sample of eta_{{c}}(1S) and J/psi produced in b-hadron decays. Systematic uncertainties not estimated.


pdgid: M070M
text:
From a simultaneous fit to e+ e-, mu+ mu- and hadronic channels assuming Gamma(e+ e-) = Gamma(mu+ mu-).


pdgid: M070W
text:
Calculated by us from the reported values of Gamma(e+ e-)xB(mu+ mu-) using B(e+ e-) = (5.94+-0.06)% and B(mu+ mu-) = (5.93+-0.06)%.


pdgid: M070W1
text:
From a simultaneous fit to e+ e-, mu+ mu-, and hadronic channels assuming Gamma(e+ e-) = Gamma(mu+ mu-).


pdgid: M070W1
text:
Calculated by us from the reported values of Gamma(e+ e-)xB(mu+ mu-) using B(mu+ mu-) = (5.93+-0.06)%.


pdgid: M070G25
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> eta pi+ pi-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 0.51+-0.22+-0.03 eV which we divide by our best value B(eta --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 23.02+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070Q20
text:
LEES 2021C  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> eta pi+ pi- pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 3pi0)] = 21.1+-1.7+-3.2 eV which we divide by our best value B(eta --> 3pi0) = 32.56+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070Q19
text:
LEES 2021C  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> eta pi+ pi- 3pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] = 10.6+-1.6+-1.6 eV which we divide by our best value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070Q54
text:
LEES 2023   reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> eta K+ K-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 3pi0)] = 1.55+-0.51+-0.16 eV which we divide by our best value B(eta --> 3pi0) = 32.56+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G24
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega pi+ pi-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 47.8+-3.1+-3.2 eV which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070P54
text:
LEES 2018E  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega pi0 pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 24.8+-1.8+-2.5 eV which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070Q18
text:
LEES 2021C  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega 3pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 9.4+-2.3+-1.5 eV which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070Q21
text:
LEES 2021C  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega eta) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 3pi0)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 4.9+-2.1+-0.7 eV which we divide by our best values B(eta --> 3pi0) = 32.56+-0.21E-2, B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M070P58
text:
LEES 2018E  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega pi0 eta) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 1.7+-0.8+-0.3 eV which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070Q11
text:
LEES 2021   reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega pi+ pi- 2pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 165+-9+-25 eV which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G29
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega K Kbar) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 3.3+-1.3+-1.2 eV which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070GY6
text:
LEES 2014H  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> K_2^*(1430)+ K0S pi- + c.c.) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi)] = 10.0+-4.8+-0.8 eV which we divide by our best value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = 49.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G02
text:
LEES 2012F  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> Kbar_2^*(1430)0 K^*(892)0 + c.c.) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi)] = 12.89+-0.54+-0.41 eV which we divide by our best value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = 49.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G02
text:
AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> Kbar_2^*(1430)0 K^*(892)0 + c.c.) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi)] = 16.4+-1.1+-1.4 eV which we divide by our best value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = 49.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070GY9
text:
Dividing by (1/4)**2 to take into account B(K^*(892) --> K0S pi) = 1/4 and  B(K^*(1430) --> K0S pi) = 1/4 B(K^*(1430) --> K pi).


pdgid: M070GY9
text:
LEES 2014H  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> K_2^*(1430)- K^*(892)+ + c.c.) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi)] = 9.28+-8.0+-0.32 eV which we divide by our best value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = 49.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G14
text:
LEES 2012F  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi pi+ pi-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 2.19+-0.23+-0.07 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G14
text:
SHEN 2009   reports 4.50+-0.41+-0.26 eV from a measurement of [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi pi+ pi-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] assuming B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.2+-0.6E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G14
text:
AUBERT,BE 2006D  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi pi+ pi-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 2.61+-0.30+-0.18 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G15
text:
LEES 2012F  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi pi0 pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 1.36+-0.27+-0.07 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G15
text:
AUBERT,BE 2006D  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi pi0 pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 1.54+-0.40+-0.16 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G10
text:
AUBERT 2006D  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi 2(pi+ pi-)) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.47+-0.09+-0.03E-2 keV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G28
text:
LEES 2023 quotes Gamma(e e)**J/psi.B(J/psi --> phi eta)  . B(phi --> K+ K-) . B(eta --> 3pi0) = 0.64+-0.26+-0.06 eV.


pdgid: M070G28
text:
AUBERT 2007AU quotes Gamma(e e)**J/psi.B(J/psi --> phi eta)  . B(phi --> K+ K-) . B(eta --> 3pi) = 0.84+-0.37+-0.05 eV.


pdgid: M070G05
text:
LEES 2012F  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi f_0(980) --> phi pi+ pi-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.69+-0.11+-0.05 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G05
text:
Multiplied by 2/3 to take into account the phi pi+ pi- mode only. Using B(phi --> K+ K-) = (49.2+-0.6)%.


pdgid: M070G05
text:
AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi f_0(980) --> phi pi+ pi-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.50+-0.11+-0.04 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G06
text:
LEES 2012F  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi f_0(980) --> phi pi0 pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.48+-0.12+-0.05 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G06
text:
AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi f_0(980) --> phi pi0 pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.47+-0.19+-0.05 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G07
text:
Using pi+ pi- invariant mass between 1.1 and 1.5 GeV.  May include other sources such as  f_{{0}}(1370).


pdgid: M070G07
text:
LEES 2012F  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi f_2(1270)) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] = 1.51+-0.25+-0.10 eV which we divide by our best value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3+2.8-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G07
text:
AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi f_2(1270)) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] = 3.44+-0.55+-0.28 eV which we divide by our best value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3+2.8-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070GZ2
text:
Dividing by 1/4 to take into account B(f_2^'(1525) --> K0S K0S) = 1/4 B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar)  and using B(phi --> K+ K-) = (48.9+-0.5)%.


pdgid: M070GZ2
text:
LEES 2014H  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi f_2^'(1525)) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar)] = 7.2+-2.8+-0.3 eV which we divide by our best value B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8+-2.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G09
text:
LEES 2012F  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi K+ K-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 2.26+-0.26+-0.16 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070GZ1
text:
LEES 2014H  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi K0S K0S) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 1.6+-0.4+-0.1 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070GZ4
text:
LEES 2014H  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> f_2^'(1525) K+ K-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar)] = 5.12+-1.68+-0.20 eV which we divide by our best value B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8+-2.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070P53
text:
LEES 2021   reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> pi+ pi- 3pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(total)] = 19.2+-4.5+-3.2 eV which we divide by our best value [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(total) = 0.3469+-0.0034. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G26
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> 2( pi+ pi- ) eta) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] = 5.16+-0.85+-0.39 eV which we divide by our best value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070P57
text:
LEES 2021   reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0 pi0 eta) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 6+-4+-1 eV which we divide by our best value B(eta --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 23.02+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070G30
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> K+ K- pi+ pi- eta) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] = 10.2+-1.3+-0.8 eV which we divide by our best value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070R4
text:
Using B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (5.967+-0.023)% and R = 2.26+-0.01  determined by a fit to data  from Mark-I, DM2, BESII, KEDR, and BESIII.


pdgid: M070R4
text:
Using B(J/psi --> lepton+ lepton-) = (5.90+-0.09)% from RPP-2002 and  R = 2.28+-0.04 determined by a fit to data from BAI 2000 and BAI 2002C. Superseded  by LIAO 2023.


pdgid: M070S65
text:
Calculated using the value Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(g g g) = 0.137+-0.001+-0.016+-0.004  from BESSON 2008 and the PDG 2008 values of B(lepton+ lepton-), B(virtual gamma --> hadrons), and B(gamma eta_c()). The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is partially correlated with that of Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(total) measurement of BESSON 2008.


pdgid: M070S66
text:
Calculated using the value Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(g g g) = 0.137+-0.001+-0.016+-0.004  from BESSON 2008 and the value of Gamma(g g g)/Gamma(total). The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is partially correlated with that of Gamma(g g g)/Gamma(total) measurement of BESSON 2008.


pdgid: M070R5
text:
Not independent of the corresponding measurements of  Gamma(e+ e-)/Gamma(total) and Gamma(mu+ mu-)/Gamma(total).


pdgid: M070R5
text:
Not independent of the corresponding measurements of  Gamma(e+ e-) x Gamma(e+ e-)/Gamma(total) and Gamma(mu+ mu-) x Gamma(e+ e-)/Gamma(total).


pdgid: M070Q74
text:
AAIJ 2024AE reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu- mu+ mu-)/G(total)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 1.89+-0.17+-0.09E-5 which we multiply by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070Q74
text:
Measured with psi(2S) --> pi+ pi- J/psi, J/psi --> mu+ mu- mu+ mu-. B(psi(2S) --> pi+ pi- J/psi) =  (34.68+-0.30)% from PDG 2020 was used.


pdgid: M070Q74
text:
HAYRAPETYAN 2024A  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu- mu+ mu-)/G(total)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 16.9+5.5-4.6+-0.6E-6 which we multiply by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070R20
text:
By a simultaneous fit of the pi pi invariant mass distribution over the decay modes J/psi --> rho0 pi0,  J/psi --> rho+ pi-, J/psi --> rho- pi+. In the fit only the intermediate states rho(770) pi and  rho(1450) pi are considered.


pdgid: M070R20
text:
Obtained comparing the rates for pi+ pi- pi0 and mu+ mu-, using J/psi events produced via psi(2S) --> pi+ pi- J/psi and with B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) = 5.88+-0.10%.


pdgid: M070P81
text:
From an energy scan of e+ e- --> J/psi --> eta pi+ pi- assuming PDG 2016 values for  Gamma(e+ e-), Gamma(mu+ mu-), and Gamma(total).


pdgid: M070R24
text:
ANASHIN 2022   reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 0.946+-0.016+-0.108E-2 which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070R30
text:
Using B(eta --> 2gamma) = (39.43+-0.26)%, B(eta --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 22.6+-0.4%, B(eta --> pi+ pi- gamma) = 4.68+-0.11%, and B(omega --> pi+ pi- pi0) = (89.1+-0.7)%.


pdgid: M070R31
text:
Using B(eta^'() --> pi+ pi- eta) = (44.3+-1.5)%, B(eta^'() --> pi+ pi- gamma) = 29.5+-1.0%, B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.43+-0.26%, and B(omega --> pi+ pi- pi0) = (89.1+-0.7)%.


pdgid: M070Q38
text:
ANASHIN 2022   reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 0.136+-0.008+-0.026E-2 which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070S52
text:
Obtained from J/psi --> K^*(892) K- pi+ +  c.c. --> K+ K- pi+ pi- taking the value 2/3  for the probability of the K^*(892)0 --> K+ pi- decay.


pdgid: M070S52
text:
A K_{{0}}^*(700) is observed by ABLIKIM 2006C in the K+ pi- mass spectrum of the Kbar^*(892)0 K+ pi- final state against the Kbar^*(892). A corresponding branching fraction  of the J/psi(1S) is not presented.


pdgid: M070R33
text:
Corresponding to one of the two fit solutions with delta = (-95.9+-1.5)degree for the phase angle between the resonant J/psi --> phi pi0 and non-phi J/psi --> K+ K- pi0 contributions.


pdgid: M070R33
text:
Corresponding to one of the two fit solutions with delta = (-152.1+-7.7)degree for the phase angle between the resonant J/psi --> phi pi0 and non-phi J/psi --> K+ K- pi0 contributions.


pdgid: M070R37
text:
From a fit to the combined phi eta invariant mass spectrum with a Gaussian function for the  J/psi signals and a second-order polynomial function for the backgrounds.


pdgid: M070P85
text:
Including contributions from intermediate resonances. Evidence for an intermediate resonance at  M ~~ 2 GeV and Gamma ~~ 150 MeV decaying to phi eta^' with  J**P = 1+ or J**P = 1-, and B(J/psi --> eta X) x B(X --> phi eta^')  ~~ E-4.


pdgid: M070S75
text:
Assuming constructive interference between a_{{0}}(980)-f_{{0}}(980) mixing and  electromagnetic decay. Destructive interference gives a value of 4.93+-1.77E-6 for this  branching fraction.


pdgid: M070S6
text:
ABLIKIM 2015H  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi f_1(1285))/G(total)] * [B(f_1(1285) --> eta pi+ pi-)] = 1.20+-0.6+-0.14E-4 which we divide by our best value B(f_1(1285) --> eta pi+ pi-) = 35+-15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070S6
text:
We attribute to the f_{{1}}(1285) the signal observed in the pi+ pi- eta invariant mass distribution at 1297 MeV.


pdgid: M070R9
text:
LEES 2021   reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> 2(pi+ pi-) pi0)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] * [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi0 pi0)] = 14.8+-2.6+-2.2E-3 keV which we divide by our best values [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 2.33+-0.04 keV, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi0 pi0) = 18.2+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M070R9
text:
From an energy scan of e+ e- --> J/psi --> 2(pi+ pi-) pi0, assuming PDG 2016 values for  Gamma(e+ e-), Gamma(mu+ mu-), and Gamma(total), and for a phase difference between  strong and electromagnetic amplitudes of (84.9+-3.6)degrees. An alternative solution is  (4.85+-0.45)% with a phase of (-84.7+-3.1)degrees.


pdgid: M070R7
text:
The quoted systematic error includes a contribution of 1.23% (added in quadrature)  from the uncertainty on the number of J/psi events.


pdgid: M070R7
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] = 18.6+-1.2+-1.1E-3 keV which we divide by our best value [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] = 0.808+-0.014 keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070S42
text:
LEES 2021   reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> 2( pi+ pi- ) eta)/G(total)] * [[G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] * [B(eta --> 3pi0)] = 5.6+-2.6+-0.8E-3 keV which we divide by our best values [G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.53+-0.10 keV, B(eta --> 3pi0) = 32.56+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M070R50
text:
WU 2006   reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] = 2.21+-0.13+-0.10E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070R56
text:
From the combination of p pbar eta --> p pbar gamma gamma and p pbar eta --> p pbar pi+ pi- pi0 channels.


pdgid: M070R59
text:
From the combination of p pbar eta^' --> p pbar pi+ pi- eta and p pbar eta^' --> p pbar pi+ pi- gamma  channels.


pdgid: M070R59
text:
From the combination of p pbar eta^'() --> p pbar pi+ pi- eta and p pbar eta^'() --> p pbar gamma rho0 channels.


pdgid: M070R60
text:
WU 2006   reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> Lambda Lambdabar)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] = 2.00+0.34-0.29+-0.34E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070R72
text:
LU 2019   reports 8.32+1.63-1.45+-0.49E-4 from a measurement of [G(J/psi(1S) --> p K- Lambdabar +c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] assuming B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.026+-0.031E-3, which we rescale to our best value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070Q73
text:
The branching fractions for the charge-conjugate channels are measured separately as 1.361+-0.006+-0.025E-4 for  pbar K0S Sigma+ and 1.352+-0.006+-0.025E-4 for p K0S Sigmabar-.


pdgid: M070R61
text:
ABLIKIM 2012B and HENRARD 1987 quote results for B(J/psi --> Lambdabar Sigma0)  which we multiply by 2.


pdgid: M070R85
text:
MITCHELL 2009   reports 1.98+-0.09+-0.30E-2 from a measurement of [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 35.04+-0.07+-0.77E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.69+-0.34E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070R82
text:
ABLIKIM 2018O  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma pi0)/G(total)] * [B(pi0 --> 2gamma)] = 3.57+-0.12+-0.16E-5 from a measurement of [[G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma pi0)/G(total)] * [B(pi0 --> 2gamma)] * [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.49+-0.30E-2, which we rescale to our best values B(pi0 --> 2gamma) = 98.823+-0.034E-2, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.69+-0.34E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M070R83
text:
ABLIKIM 2018O  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] = 4.42+-0.04+-0.18E-4 from a measurement of [[G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] * [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.49+-0.30E-2, which we rescale to our best values B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.69+-0.34E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M070R84
text:
ABLIKIM 2018O  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta^'(958))/G(total)] * [B(eta^'(958) --> gamma gamma)] = 1.26+-0.02+-0.05E-4 from a measurement of [[G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta^'(958))/G(total)] * [B(eta^'(958) --> gamma gamma)] * [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.49+-0.30E-2, which we rescale to our best values B(eta^'(958) --> gamma gamma) = 2.307+-0.033E-2, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.69+-0.34E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M070R84
text:
ABLIKIM 2011   reports 4.84+-0.03+-0.24E-3 from a measurement of [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta^'(958))/G(total)] / [B(eta^'(958) --> pi+ pi- eta)] / [B(eta --> 2gamma)] assuming B(eta^'(958) --> pi+ pi- eta) = 43.2+-0.7E-2,B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.31+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best values B(eta^'(958) --> pi+ pi- eta) = 42.5+-0.5E-2, B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M070R89
text:
Interference with the J/psi(1S) radiative transition to the broad K Kbar pi pseudoscalar state around 1800 is 0.15+-0.01+-0.05E-3.


pdgid: M070R77
text:
Constructive interference between the X(1835) and  eta(1405)/eta(1475) is assumed in a fit to the gamma phi invariant mass.


pdgid: M070R77
text:
Destructive interference between the X(1835) and  eta(1405)/eta(1475) is assumed in a fit to the gamma phi invariant mass.


pdgid: M070R86
text:
DOBBS 2015   reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma f_2(1270))/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] = 1.744+-0.052+-0.122E-3 which we divide by our best value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3+2.8-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2006V  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma f_2(1270))/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] = 1.371+-0.010+-0.222E-3 which we divide by our best value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3+2.8-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2006V  reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma f_2(1270))/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] = 1.200+-0.027+-0.174E-3 which we divide by our best value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3+2.8-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070R86
text:
Estimated using B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)=0.843+-0.012. The errors do not contain the uncertainty in the f_{{2}}(1270) decay.


pdgid: M070R88
text:
Obtained summing the sequential decay channels B(J/psi --> gamma f_1(1285), f_1(1285) --> pi pi pi pi ) = 1.44+-0.39+-0.27E-4; B(J/psi --> gamma f_1(1285), f_1(1285) --> a_0(980) pi, a_0(980) --> eta pi) = 3.90+-0.42+-0.87E-4; B(J/psi --> gamma f_1(1285), f_1(1285) --> a_0(980) pi, a_0(980) --> K Kbar) = 0.66+-0.26+-0.29E-4; B(J/psi --> gamma f_1(1285), f_1(1285) --> gamma rho0) = 0.25+-0.07+-0.03E-4.


pdgid: M070R88
text:
Using B(f_1(1285) --> a_0(980) pi) = 0.37, and including unknown branching ratio for a_0(980) --> eta pi.


pdgid: M070R87
text:
DOBBS 2015   reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma f_2^'(1525))/G(total)] * [B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar)] = 7.09+-0.46+-0.67E-4 which we divide by our best value B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8+-2.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070R91
text:
Includes unknown branching fraction to K+ K- or K0S K0S. We have multiplied K+ K- measurement by 2, and K0S K0S by 4 to obtain K Kbar result.


pdgid: M070B02
text:
For Gamma = 20/50 MeV, the 90% CL upper limits for pi+ pi- and pi0 pi0 are 2.6/5.2E-5 and 1.3/1.9E-5, respectively.


pdgid: M070B03
text:
For Gamma = 20/50 MeV, the 90% CL upper limits for K+ K- and K0S K0S are 1.7/3.1E-5 and 1.2/2.0E-5, respectively.


pdgid: M070R78
text:
From a fit of the measured pi+ pi- eta^' lineshape that accounts for the abrupt distortion observed at the p pbar threshold with a Flatte formula in addition to known backgrounds and contributors, as well as an ad hoc Breit-Wigner (M ~~ 1919 MeV; Gamma ~~ 51 MeV) that is required for a good fit. Another explanation for the distortion provided by ABLIKIM 2016J is that a second resonance near 1870 MeV interferes with the X(1835); fits to this possibility yield product branching fraction values compatible with that shown within the respective systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: M070R78
text:
From a fit of the pi+ pi- eta^' mass distribution to a combination of gamma f_1(1510), gamma X(1835), and two  states gamma X(2120) and  gamma eta(2370), for M(pi+ pi- eta^') < 2.8  GeV,and accounting for backgrounds from non-eta^' events and J/psi --> pi0 pi+ pi- eta^'.


pdgid: M070S71
text:
From the fit including final state interaction effects in isospin 0 S-wave according to SIBIRTSEV 2005A.


pdgid: M070P37
text:
Constructive interference between the X(1835) and eta(1405)/eta(1475) is assumed in a  fit to the gamma phi invariant mass.


pdgid: M070P37
text:
Destructive interference between the X(1835) and eta(1405)/eta(1475) is assumed in a  fit to the gamma phi invariant mass.


pdgid: M070P87
text:
Decaying via the intermediate f_0(980) eta^', fitted together with X(1835), a 600 MeV broad  structure around 2.8 GeV, and the tail of the eta_{{c}}(1S).


pdgid: M070S68
text:
For a narrow state, A0, with mass mass(A0) < 1.2 GeV. The limit varies with mass(A0),    reaching its largest value of 1.7E-6 at 1.2 GeV and being 7.0E-7 for mass(A0) = 0.


pdgid: M070S68
text:
The limit varies with mass mass(A0) of a narrow state A0 and is 4.3E-6 for mass(A0) = 0   , reaches its largest value of 6.3E-6 at mass(A0) = 500 MeV, and is 3.6E-6 at mass(A0)  =  960 MeV.


pdgid: M070Q68
text:
For a light pseudoscalar axion-like particle, A0, with a mass in the range 0.18 -- 2.85  GeV. The measured 95% CL limit as a function of mass(A0) ranges from 3.7E-8 to 4.85E-7.


pdgid: M070Q68
text:
For a light pseudoscalar axion-like particle, A0, with a mass in the range 0.165 -- 2.84  GeV. The measured 95% CL limit as a function of mass(A0) ranges from 8.3E-8 to 1.8E-6.


pdgid: M070S76
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with a mass in the range 0.212 -- 3.0 GeV. The  measured 90% CL limit as a function of mass(A0) is in the range (1.2 -- 778.0)xE-9.


pdgid: M070S76
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with a mass in the range 0.212 -- 3 GeV. The  measured 90% CL limit as a function of mass(A0) is in the range (2.8 -- 495.3)xE-8.


pdgid: M070S76
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with a mass in the range 0.21 -- 3.00 GeV. The measured 90% CL limit as a function of mass(A0) ranges from  4E-7 to 2.1E-5.


pdgid: M070S90
text:
Approximation of the transition form factor squared as an incoherent sum of the rho-meson and  one-pole non-resonant amplitudes gives the pole mass m(Lambda) = 2.56+-0.04+-0.03 GeV.  Supersedes ABLIKIM 2014I.


pdgid: M070Q22
text:
Assuming constructive interference. Destructive interference gives a value of 4.43+-0.23+-0.19E-6 for  this branching fraction.


pdgid: M070P42
text:
For a dark photon U with mass between 10 and 2400 MeV. Obtained 90% C.L. limits as a  function of mass(U) range from 1.9E-8 to 91.1E-8.


pdgid: M070P61
text:
For a dark photon U with mass between 100 and 2100 MeV. Obtained 90% C.L. limits as a  function of mass(U) range from 1.8E-8 to 2.0E-7. The corresponding limits on the  branching fraction J/psi --> eta^' U range from 5.7E-8 to 7.4E-7.


pdgid: M070R80
text:
WICHT 2008   reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma gamma)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] < 0.16E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.020E-3.


pdgid: M070Q69
text:
For a light scalar, X0, with a mass in the range 1 -- 1000 MeV. The measured limit at  the 90% credibility level as a function of mass(X0) ranges from 6.2E-9 to 5.5E-7.


pdgid: M070Q69
text:
For a light vector, X0, with a mass in the range 1 -- 1000 MeV. The measured limit at  the 90% credibility level as a function of mass(X0) ranges from 4.5E-9 to 9.6E-7.


pdgid: M056M
text:
From a fit of the phi phi invariant mass with the width of chi_{{c0}}(1P) fixed to the PDG 2016  value.


pdgid: M056M
text:
Mass value shifted by us by amount appropriate for psi(2S) mass = 3686 MeV and J/psi(1S) mass = 3097 MeV.


pdgid: M056G3
text:
We multiplied the measurement by 3 to convert from pi0 pi0 to pi pi. Interference with the continuum included.


pdgid: M056P08
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BT reports 2.127+-0.002+-0.101 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R24
text:
ABLIKIM 2004G  reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(980) f_0(980))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 6.5+-1.6+-1.3E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R62
text:
HE 2008B  reports 3.54+-0.10+-0.43+-0.18 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> pi+ pi- pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R63
text:
HE 2008B  reports 3.04+-0.18+-0.42+-0.16 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> rho+ pi- pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R63
text:
Calculated by us. We have added the values from HE 2008B for rho+ pi- pi0 and rho- pi+ pi0 decays assuming uncorrelated statistical and fully correlated systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: M056R71
text:
ABLIKIM 2011A  reports 3.34+-0.06+-0.44E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> 4pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R36
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q  reports 10.44+-2.37+3.05-1.90E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K_0^*(1430)0 Kbar_0^*(1430)0 --> pi+ pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R37
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q  reports 8.49+-1.66+1.32-1.99E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K_0^*(1430)0 Kbar_2^*(1430)0 + c.c. --> pi+ pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R38
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q  reports 6.66+-1.31+1.60-1.51E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K_1(1270)+ K- + c.c. --> pi+ pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R39
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q  reports <2.85E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K_1(1400)+ K- + c.c. --> pi+ pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R28
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q  reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(980) f_0(980))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 1.59+-0.50+0.89-0.72E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R29
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q  reports 8.42+-1.42+1.65-2.29E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(980) f_0(2200))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R30
text:
One of the f_{{0}}(1370) mesons is identified via decay to pi+ pi- while the other via K+ K- decay. Both branching fractions for these f_{{0}}() decays are implicitly included in the quoted result.


pdgid: M056R30
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q  reports <2.9E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(1370) f_0(1370))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R31
text:
The f_{{0}}() mesons are identified via f_0(1370) --> pi+ pi- and f_0(1500) --> K+ K- decays. Both branching fractions for these f_{{0}}() decays are implicitly included in the quoted result.


pdgid: M056R31
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q  reports <1.8E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(1370) f_0(1500))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R32
text:
The f_{{0}}() mesons are identified via f_0(1370) --> pi+ pi- and f_0(1710) --> K+ K- decays. Both branching fractions for these f_{{0}}() decays are implicitly included in the quoted result.


pdgid: M056R32
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q  reports 7.12+-1.85+3.28-1.68E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(1370) f_0(1710))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R33
text:
The f_{{0}}() mesons are identified via f_0(1500) --> pi+ pi- and f_0(1370) --> K+ K- decays. Both branching fractions for these f_{{0}}() decays are implicitly included in the quoted result.


pdgid: M056R33
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q  reports <1.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(1500) f_0(1370))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R34
text:
One of the f_{{0}}(1500) is identified via decay to pi+ pi- while the other via K+ K- decay. Both branching fractions for these f_{{0}}() decays are implicitly included in the quoted result.


pdgid: M056R34
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q  reports <0.55E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(1500) f_0(1500))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R35
text:
The f_{{0}}() mesons are identified via f_0(1500) --> pi+ pi- and f_0(1710) --> K+ K- decays. Both branching fractions for these f_{{0}}() decays are implicitly included in the quoted result.


pdgid: M056R35
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q  reports <0.73E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(1500) f_0(1710))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R64
text:
HE 2008B  reports 0.59+-0.05+-0.08+-0.03 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ K- pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R66
text:
HE 2008B  reports 2.64+-0.15+-0.31+-0.14 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R67
text:
HE 2008B  reports 1.28+-0.16+-0.15+-0.07 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> rho+ K- K0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R68
text:
HE 2008B  reports 0.49+-0.10+-0.07+-0.03 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K^*(892)- K+ pi0 --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R47
text:
ABLIKIM 2005O  reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K0S K0S pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 0.558+-0.051+-0.089E-3 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R69
text:
HE 2008B  reports 0.32+-0.05+-0.05+-0.02 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ K- eta pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2022Q  reports 2.080+-0.006+-0.068E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.2E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R4
text:
Rescaled by us using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0())= (9.4+-0.4)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (32.6+-0.5)%.


pdgid: M056R26
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q  reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 0.168+-0.035+0.047-0.040E-3 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R26
text:
ABLIKIM 2004H  reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 1.53+-0.29+-0.26E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R03
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AI reports 8.92+-0.84+-0.65E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> eta eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.99+-0.27E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R03
text:
ASNER 2009   reports <0.25E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> eta eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R03
text:
ADAMS 2007   reports <0.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> eta eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R04
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AI reports 2.19+-0.03+-0.14E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> eta^' eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.99+-0.27E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R04
text:
ASNER 2009   reports 2.12+-0.13+-0.21E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> eta^' eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R04
text:
ADAMS 2007   reports 1.7+-0.4+-0.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> eta^' eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 0.0922+-0.0011+-0.0046, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R27
text:
ABLIKIM 2011K  reports 0.95+-0.03+-0.11E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> omega omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R27
text:
ABLIKIM 2005N  reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> omega omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 0.212+-0.053+-0.037E-3 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2019J  reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> omega phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 13.83+-0.70+-1.01E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2011K  reports 1.2+-0.1+-0.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> omega phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R08
text:
ATHAR 2007   reports <0.21E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R08
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R  reports <1.1E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R51
text:
ATHAR 2007   reports <0.38E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R17
text:
ATHAR 2007   reports <0.10E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R17
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R  reports <0.70E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R05
text:
ATHAR 2007   reports <0.06E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R09
text:
ATHAR 2007   reports <0.24E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ K- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R48
text:
ABLIKIM 2005O  reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ K- K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 0.138+-0.039+-0.025E-3 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R95
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AA reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K0S K0S K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 5.64+-0.33+-0.37E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R01
text:
ABLIKIM 2006T  reports 1.03+-0.22+-0.15E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ K- phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R16
text:
Measured using B( psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P) ) = 9.75+-0.24E-2 and  B( phi --> K+ K- ) =  49.2+-0.5E-2  from  PDG 2022.


pdgid: M056R98
text:
ABLIKIM 2020B  reports 8.41+-0.74+-0.62E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> phi phi eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R06
text:
ONYISI 2010   reports 7.76+-0.37+-0.51+-0.39E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R06
text:
ATHAR 2007   reports 0.59+-0.10+-0.08E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R50
text:
ONYISI 2010   reports 3.73+-0.38+-0.28+-0.19E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R50
text:
ATHAR 2007   reports 0.39+-0.11+-0.04E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R70
text:
ONYISI 2010   reports 5.57+-0.48+-0.42+-0.14E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R75
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F  reports 6.12+-1.18+-0.86E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R65
text:
HE 2008B  reports 0.11+-0.02+-0.02+-0.01 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R72
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F  reports 1.24+-0.20+-0.18E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar K+ K-  (non-resonant))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R49
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J  reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p nbar pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 1.26+-0.02+-0.11E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R49
text:
ABLIKIM 2006I  reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p nbar pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 1.10+-0.24+-0.18E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R82
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J  reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> pbar n pi+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 1.34+-0.03+-0.11E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R83
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J  reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p nbar pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 2.29+-0.08+-0.18E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R84
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J  reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> pbar n pi+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 2.16+-0.07+-0.16E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R44
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I  reports 119.0+-6.4+-11.4E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Lambda Lambdabar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R77
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I  reports <54E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Lambda Lambdabar pi+ pi-  (non-resonant))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R78
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I  reports <55E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma(1385)+ Lambdabar pi- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R79
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I  reports <50E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma(1385)- Lambdabar pi+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R07
text:
ABLIKIM 2013D  reports 1.32+-0.03+-0.10E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R07
text:
ATHAR 2007   reports 1.07+-0.17+-0.12E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R99
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AU reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K^*(892)+ pbar Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 4.7+-0.7+-0.5E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R73
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F  reports 3.00+-0.58+-0.50E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda(1520) + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056P02
text:
ABLIKIM 2021AV reports 6.65+-0.26+-0.41E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> n K0S Lambdabar  + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 0.0979+-0.0020, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R74
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F  reports 3.18+-1.11+-0.53E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Lambda(1520) Lambdabar(1520))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R59
text:
ABLIKIM 2018V  reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 4.72+-0.18+-0.28E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R59
text:
NAIK 2008   reports 4.41+-0.56+-0.47E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R59
text:
ABLIKIM 2013H  reports 4.78+-0.34+-0.39E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R60
text:
ABLIKIM 2018V  reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 4.99+-0.24+-0.24E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R60
text:
NAIK 2008   reports 3.25+-0.57+-0.43E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R60
text:
ABLIKIM 2013H  reports 4.54+-0.42+-0.30E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056P12
text:
ABLIKIM 2024CA reports 12.6+-2.0+-1.3E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056P00
text:
ABLIKIM 2020I  reports 5.13+-0.24+-0.41E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma- Sigmabar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R80
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I  reports 16.4+-5.7+-1.6E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma(1385)+ Sigmabar(1385)-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R81
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I  reports 23.5+-6.2+-2.3E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma(1385)- Sigmabar(1385)+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R92
text:
ABLIKIM 2015I  reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K- Lambda Xibar+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 1.90+-0.30+-0.16E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R61
text:
ABLIKIM 2022O  reports 4.67+-0.19+-0.26E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Xi0 Xibar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.2E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R61
text:
NAIK 2008   reports 3.34+-0.70+-0.48E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Xi0 Xibar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R45
text:
ABLIKIM 2022O  reports 4.43+-0.08+-0.18E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Xi- Xibar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.2E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R45
text:
NAIK 2008   reports 5.14+-0.60+-0.47E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Xi- Xibar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R56
text:
BENNETT 2008A  reports <9.6E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma rho0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R56
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E  reports <10.5E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma rho0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R57
text:
BENNETT 2008A  reports <8.8E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R57
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E  reports <12.9E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R58
text:
BENNETT 2008A  reports <6.4E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R58
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E  reports <16.2E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R93
text:
ABLIKIM 2017I  reports 1.51+-0.30+-0.13E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> e+ e- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.99+-0.27E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R94
text:
Uses  B( psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P) ) x B( chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S) )  = 15.8+-0.3+-0.6E-4 from ABLIKIM 2017N and accounts for common systematic errors.


pdgid: M056R18
text:
The values of B(p pbar)B(gamma gamma) and B(gamma gamma)B(gamma J/psi) measured by ANDREOTTI 2004 are not independent. The latter is used in the fit because of smaller systematics.


pdgid: M056R19
text:
Values in (G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar) * G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))/G(total)) and ([G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar)/G(total) * G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))/G(total)]) are not independent. The latter is used in the fit since it is less correlated to the total width.


pdgid: M056B4
text:
Calculated by us.  The value for B(chi_c0() --> 2pi+ 2pi-) reported in BAI 1999B is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.3+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M056B4
text:
The value B(psi(1S) --> gamma chi_c0())xB(chi_c0() --> 2pi+ 2pi-) reported in TANENBAUM 1978 is derived using B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)xB(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) =(4.6+-0.7)%. Calculated by us using B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.1181+-0.0020.


pdgid: M056P09
text:
Calculated by us. The value given here is derived from the value of B(chi_c0() --> 2(pi+ pi-)) reported  in ABLIKIM 2024BT using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.79+-0.20)%  [PDG 2022].


pdgid: M056B19
text:
The reported value is derived using B(psi(2S) --> pi+ pi- J/psi) x B(J/psi --> lepton+ lepton-) = (4.6+-0.7)%. Calculated by us using  B(J/psi --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.1181+-0.0020.


pdgid: M056B22
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2010A reports B(chi_c0() --> pi0 pi0) = 3.23+-0.03+-0.23+-0.14E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.4+-0.4)%. We have multiplied the pi0 pi0 measurement by 3 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M056B22
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c0() --> pi+ pi-) = 6.37+-0.08+-0.31+-0.32E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0() ) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)%. We have multiplied the pi+ pi- measurement by 3/2 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M056B22
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c0() --> pi0 pi0) = 2.94+-0.07+-0.32+-0.15E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0() ) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)%. We have multiplied the pi0 pi0 measurement by 3 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M056B5
text:
Calculated by us. The value for B(chi_c0() --> pi+ pi-) reported (9.3+-0.8)% and B(psi^' --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D]. We have multiplied pi+ pi- measurement by 3/2 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M056B11
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2010A reports B(chi_c0() --> eta eta) = 3.44+-0.10+-0.24+-0.13E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.4+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M056B11
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c0() --> eta eta) = 3.18+-0.13+-0.31+-0.16E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0() ) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)%.


pdgid: M056B11
text:
Superseded by ASNER 2009. Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c0(1P) --> eta eta) reported by ADAMS 2007 was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)% (ATHAR 2004).


pdgid: M056B23
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c0() --> K+ K-) = 6.47+-0.08+-0.35+-0.32E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0() ) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)%.


pdgid: M056B9
text:
Calculated by us. The value for B(chi_c0() --> K+ K-) reported by BAI 1998I is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.3+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M056B12
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c0() --> K0S K0S) = 3.49+-0.08+-0.18+-0.17E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0() ) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)%.


pdgid: M056B13
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c0() --> K0S K0S) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = (9.3+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M056B14
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c0() --> 2K+ 2K-) reported by ABLIKIM 2006T was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = (9.2+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M056B15
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c0() --> 2K+ 2K-) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = (9.3+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M056B16
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c0() --> phi phi) reported by ABLIKIM 2011K was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = (9.62+-0.31)%.


pdgid: M056B16
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c0() --> phi phi) reported by ABLIKIM 2006T was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = (9.2+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M056B17
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c0() --> phi phi) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = (9.3+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M056B6
text:
Calculated by us. NAIK 2008 reports B(chi_c0() --> p pbar) = 25.7+-1.5+-1.5+-1.3E-5 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)%.


pdgid: M056B1
text:
Calculated by us.  The value for B(chi_c0() --> p pbar) reported in BAI 1998I is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.3+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M056B20
text:
Calculated by us. NAIK 2008 reports B(chi_c0() --> Lambda Lambdabar) = 33.8+-3.6+-2.2+-1.7E-5 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)%.


pdgid: M056B20
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2013H reports B(chi_c0() --> Lambda Lambdabar) = 33.3+-2.0+-2.6E-5  from a measurement of B(chi_c0() --> Lambda Lambdabar) x B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.62+-0.31)%.


pdgid: M056B21
text:
BAI 2003E reports [ B(chi_c0() --> Lambda Lambdabar) B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) / B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) ] x [B**2(Lambda --> pi- p) / B(J/psi --> p pbar) ] =  (2.45+0.68-0.65+-0.46)%. We calculate from this measurement the presented value using  B(Lambda --> pi- p) = (63.9+-0.5)% and B(J/psi --> p pbar) = 2.17+-0.07E-3.


pdgid: M056P07
text:
Calculated by us. The authors report B(chi_c0() --> Lambda Lambdabar omega) obtained from a  product using PDG 2022 value of B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()).


pdgid: M056B24
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2019BB reports B(chi_c0 --> Sigma+ pbar K0S  + c.c.) =  3.52+-0.19+-0.21E-4 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0) = (9.79+-0.20)%   and other branching fractions from PDG 2018.


pdgid: M056P01
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2020AE reports B(chi_c0 --> Sigma0 pbar K+  + c.c.) =  3.03+-0.12+-0.15E-4 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0) = (9.79+-0.20)% and  other branching fractions from PDG 2020.


pdgid: M055M
text:
From a fit of the phi phi invariant mass with the width of chi_{{c1}}(1P) fixed to the PDG 2016  value.


pdgid: M055R6
text:
ABLIKIM 2022Q  reports 1.092+-0.004+-0.035E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R6
text:
Rescaled by us using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = (8.8+-0.4)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (32.6+-0.5)%.


pdgid: M055R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BT reports 0.685+-0.001+-0.031E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R35
text:
HE 2008B  reports 1.28+-0.06+-0.15+-0.08 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pi+ pi- pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R36
text:
HE 2008B  reports 1.56+-0.13+-0.22+-0.10 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> rho+ pi- pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R44
text:
ABLIKIM 2011A  reports 0.57+-0.03+-0.08E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> 4pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R37
text:
HE 2008B  reports 0.12+-0.02+-0.02+-0.01E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ K- pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R39
text:
HE 2008B  reports 0.92+-0.09+-0.11+-0.06 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R40
text:
HE 2008B  reports 0.54+-0.11+-0.07+-0.03 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> rho- K+ Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R41
text:
HE 2008B  reports 0.25+-0.06+-0.03+-0.02 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar0 pi0 --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R42
text:
HE 2008B  reports 0.12+-0.03+-0.02+-0.01 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ K- eta pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R05
text:
ABLIKIM 2005O  reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pi+ pi- K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 0.67+-0.26+-0.11E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R25
text:
ATHAR 2007   reports 0.34+-0.10+-0.04E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ K- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 0.0907+-0.0011+-0.0054, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R09
text:
AAIJ 2023AH reports 1.04+-0.13+-0.04+-0.09E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.)] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.) = 7.0+-0.6E-3.


pdgid: M055R09
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R  reports 1.1+-0.4+-0.1E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R10
text:
AAIJ 2023AH reports 1.18+-0.17+-0.14+-0.10E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K^*(892)+ K- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.)] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.) = 7.0+-0.6E-3.


pdgid: M055R10
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R  reports 1.6+-0.7+-0.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K^*(892)+ K- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R12
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R  reports <0.9E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K_J^*(1430)0 Kbar0 + c.c. --> K0S K+ pi- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R13
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R  reports <2.4E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K_J^*(1430)+ K- + c.c. --> K0S K+ pi- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R20
text:
ATHAR 2007   reports 1.95+-0.16+-0.23E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 0.0907+-0.0011+-0.0054, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R08
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K  reports 4.67+-0.03+-0.23+-0.16E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R08
text:
ATHAR 2007   reports 5.0+-0.3+-0.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 0.0907+-0.0011+-0.0054, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R08
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R  reports 5.9+-0.7+-0.8E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R15
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K  reports 3.40+-0.03+-0.19+-0.11E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> a_0(980)+ pi- + c.c. --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R15
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R  reports 2.0+-0.5+-0.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> a_0(980)+ pi- + c.c. --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R72
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K  reports 0.18+-0.01+-0.02+-0.01E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> a_2(1320)+ pi- + c.c. --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R75
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K  reports 4.7+-0.4+-0.6+-0.2E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> a_2(1700)+ pi- + c.c. --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R73
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K  reports 0.36+-0.01+-0.06+-0.01E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> f_2(1270) eta --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R74
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K  reports 2.6+-0.4+-0.8+-0.1E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> f_4(2050) eta --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K  reports <4.6E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pi_1(1400)+ pi- + c.c. --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R77
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K  reports <1.5E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pi_1(1600)+ pi- + c.c. --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R78
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K  reports <8E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pi_1(2015)+ pi- + c.c. --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R16
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K  reports 6.4+-1.1E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> f_2(1270) eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R16
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R  reports 3.0+-0.7+-0.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> f_2(1270) eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R28
text:
ATHAR 2007   reports 2.4+-0.4+-0.3E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta^'())/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 0.0907+-0.0011+-0.0054, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R64
text:
Derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1) = (9.2+-0.4)%. Uncertainty includes both  statistical and systematic contributions combined in quadrature.


pdgid: M055R93
text:
AAIJ 2023AH reports 1.61+-0.19+-0.19+-0.14E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K_2^*(1430)+ K- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.)] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.) = 7.0+-0.6E-3.


pdgid: M055R94
text:
AAIJ 2023AH reports 1.17+-0.16+-0.05+-0.10E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K_2^*(1430) Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.)] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.) = 7.0+-0.6E-3.


pdgid: M055R18
text:
ABLIKIM 2011D  reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pi0 f_0(980) --> pi0 pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] < 6.0E-7 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R26
text:
ABLIKIM 2004H  reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 1.40+-0.27+-0.22E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R06
text:
ABLIKIM 2005O  reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ K- K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] < 4.2E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R82
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AA reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K0S K0S K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 3.4+-0.9+-0.3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R07
text:
ABLIKIM 2006T  reports 0.46+-0.16+-0.06E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ K- phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R49
text:
ABLIKIM 2011K  reports 6.0+-0.3+-0.7E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> omega omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R50
text:
ABLIKIM 2019J  reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> omega phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 2.67+-0.31+-0.27E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R50
text:
ABLIKIM 2011K  reports 0.22+-0.06+-0.02E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> omega phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R51
text:
ABLIKIM 2023N  reports 4.26+-0.13+-0.15E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> phi phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R51
text:
ABLIKIM 2011K  reports 4.4+-0.3+-0.5E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> phi phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R85
text:
ABLIKIM 2020B  reports 2.96+-0.43+-0.22E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> phi phi eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R21
text:
ONYISI 2010   reports 1.75+-0.16+-0.13+-0.11E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R21
text:
ATHAR 2007   reports 1.2+-0.5+-0.1E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R27
text:
ONYISI 2010   reports 1.56+-0.22+-0.14+-0.10E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R27
text:
ATHAR 2007   reports <0.16E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R43
text:
ONYISI 2010   reports 2.28+-0.28+-0.16+-0.14E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R48
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F  reports <1.82E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R38
text:
HE 2008B  reports <0.05E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R45
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F  reports 1.35+-0.15+-0.19E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar K+ K-  (non-resonant))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R56
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J  reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p nbar pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 0.37+-0.02+-0.04E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R57
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J  reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pbar n pi+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 0.38+-0.02+-0.04E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R58
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J  reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p nbar pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 1.00+-0.05+-0.10E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R59
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J  reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pbar n pi+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 0.98+-0.05+-0.10E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R01
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I  reports 31.1+-3.4+-3.9E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Lambda Lambdabar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R19
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I  reports 26.2+-5.5+-3.3E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Lambda Lambdabar pi+ pi-  (non-resonant))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R52
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I  reports <14E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma(1385)+ Lambdabar pi- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R53
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I  reports <14E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma(1385)- Lambdabar pi+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R22
text:
LU 2019   reports 9.15+2.63-2.25+-0.86E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda +c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K+)] assuming B(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K+) = 4.79+-0.23E-4, which we rescale to our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K+) = 4.74+-0.22E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R22
text:
ABLIKIM 2013D  reports 4.5+-0.2+-0.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda +c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R22
text:
ATHAR 2007   reports 3.3+-0.9+-0.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda +c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R89
text:
Also uses B( Lambdabar --> pbar pi+  ) =  (63.9+-0.5)%   and  B( K0S --> pi+ pi-  ) = (69.20+-0.05)%.


pdgid: M055R89
text:
ABLIKIM 2021AV reports 1.66+-0.12+-0.12E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> n K0S Lambdabar  + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 0.0975+-0.0024, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AU reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K^*(892)+ pbar Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 4.8+-0.5+-0.4E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R46
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F  reports 1.81+-0.38+-0.28E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda(1520) + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R47
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F  reports <1.00E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Lambda(1520) Lambdabar(1520))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R32
text:
ABLIKIM 2018V  reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 0.41+-0.05+-0.03E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R32
text:
ABLIKIM 2013H  reports <0.62E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R32
text:
NAIK 2008   reports <0.44E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R33
text:
ABLIKIM 2018V  reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 0.35+-0.06+-0.02E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R33
text:
ABLIKIM 2013H  reports <0.87E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R33
text:
NAIK 2008   reports <0.65E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055P01
text:
ABLIKIM 2024CA reports 5.10+-1.21+-0.67E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R87
text:
ABLIKIM 2020I  reports 5.7+-1.4+-0.6E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma- Sigmabar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R54
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I  reports <10E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma(1385)+ Sigmabar(1385)-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R55
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I  reports <5.7E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma(1385)- Sigmabar(1385)+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R71
text:
ABLIKIM 2015I  reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K- Lambda Xibar+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 1.32+-0.20+-0.12E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R34
text:
ABLIKIM 2022O  reports 0.75+-0.11+-0.06E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Xi0 Xibar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R34
text:
NAIK 2008   reports <0.60E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Xi0 Xibar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R03
text:
ABLIKIM 2022O  reports 0.58+-0.04+-0.05E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Xi- Xibar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R03
text:
NAIK 2008   reports 0.86+-0.22+-0.08E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Xi- Xibar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R04
text:
ABLIKIM 2005O  reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] < 0.6E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R29
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E  reports 228+-13+-22E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma rho0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R29
text:
BENNETT 2008A  reports 243+-19+-22E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma rho0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R30
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E  reports 69.7+-7.2+-6.6E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R30
text:
BENNETT 2008A  reports 83+-15+-12E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R31
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E  reports 25.8+-5.2+-2.3E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R31
text:
BENNETT 2008A  reports <26E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R79
text:
ABLIKIM 2017I  reports 3.73+-0.09+-0.25E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> e+ e- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R80
text:
Uses  B( psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P) ) x B( chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S) )  = 351.8+-1.0+-12.0E-4 from ABLIKIM 2017N and accounts for common systematic errors.


pdgid: M055R98
text:
Calculated by us. The value given here is derived from the value of B(chi_c1() --> 2(pi+ pi-)) reported  in ABLIKIM 2024BT using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = (9.75+-0.24)%  [PDG 2022].


pdgid: M055B16
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c1() --> K0 K+ pi- + c.c.) reported by ATHAR 2007 was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = (9.07+-0.11+-0.54)%.


pdgid: M055B16
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2006R reports B(chi_c1() --> K0S K+ pi-) = 4.0+-0.3+-0.5E-3. We use B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = 8.7+-0.4E-2.


pdgid: M055B17
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c1() --> K0S K+ pi-) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = (8.7+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M055B14
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c1() --> 2K+ 2K-) reported by ABLIKIM 2006T was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = (8.7+-0.8)%.


pdgid: M055B15
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c1() --> 2K+ 2K-) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = (8.7+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M055B6
text:
Calculated by us. NAIK 2008 reports B(chi_c1() --> p pbar) = 9.0+-0.8+-0.4+-0.5E-5 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = (9.07+-0.11+-0.54)%.


pdgid: M055B1
text:
Calculated by us.  The value for B(chi_c1() --> p pbar) reported in BAI 1998I is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = (8.7+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M055B10
text:
Calculated by us. NAIK 2008 reports B(chi_c1() --> Lambda Lambdabar) = 11.6+-1.8+-0.7+-0.7E-5 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = (9.07+-0.11+-0.54)%.


pdgid: M055B10
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2013H reports B(chi_c1() --> Lambda Lambdabar) = 12.2+-1.1+-1.1E-5  from a measurement of B(chi_c1() --> Lambda Lambdabar) x B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = (9.2+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M055B11
text:
BAI 2003E reports [ B(chi_c1() --> Lambda Lambdabar) B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) / B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) ] x [B**2(Lambda --> pi- p) / B(J/psi --> p pbar) ] =  (1.33+0.52-0.46+-0.25)%. We calculate from this measurement the presented value using  B(Lambda --> pi- p) = (63.9+-0.5)% and B(J/psi --> p pbar) = 2.17+-0.07E-3.


pdgid: M055R97
text:
Calculated by us. The authors report B(chi_c1 --> Lambda Lambdabar omega) obtained from a  product using PDG 2022 value of B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1).


pdgid: M055B01
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2019BB reports B(chi_c1 --> Sigma+ pbar K0S  + c.c.) =  1.53+-0.10+-0.08E-4 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1) = (9.75+-0.24)% and  other branching fractions from PDG 2018.


pdgid: M055R88
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2020AE reports B(chi_c1 --> Sigma0 pbar K+  + c.c.) =  1.46+-0.07+-0.07E-4 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0) = (9.75+-0.24)% and  other branching fractions from PDG 2020.


pdgid: M055B3
text:
The value for B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1())xB(chi_c1() --> gamma J/psi(1S)) quoted in HIMEL 1980 is derived using B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (33+-3)% and B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.138+-0.018. Calculated by us using B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.1181+-0.0020.


pdgid: M055QAR
text:
Statistical and systematic errors combined. Not independent of a(2)(chi_{{c1}}()) and b(2)(chi_{{c1}}()) values from ARTUSO 2009.


pdgid: M144M
text:
Combination of exclusive and inclusive analyses for the reaction psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c --> pi0 eta_c gamma. This result is the average of DOBBS 2008A and ROSNER 2005.


pdgid: M144R24
text:
ABLIKIM 2022N  reports [G(h_c(1P) --> J/psi(1S) pi0)/G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] / [B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0)]  < 7.5E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0) = 1/6  B(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi) = 1/6 ().


pdgid: M144R24
text:
ABLIKIM 2022N  reports [G(h_c(1P) --> J/psi(1S) pi0)/G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] / [B(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)] < 1.25E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi) = 7.1E-2.


pdgid: M144R07
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BY reports [G(h_c(1P) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 6.7E-7 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R07
text:
ABLIKIM 2018M  reports [G(h_c(1P) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 2.0E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R20
text:
ABLIKIM 2024R  reports [G(h_c(1P) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 3.22E-8 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R22
text:
ABLIKIM 2022M  reports [G(h_c(1P) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 5.67E-7 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R08
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AG reports [G(h_c(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 2.49+-0.27+-0.28E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R10
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> p pbar pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 4.4E-7 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R23
text:
ABLIKIM 2022M  reports [G(h_c(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 3.30+-0.71+-0.59E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R21
text:
ABLIKIM 2022M  reports [G(h_c(1P) --> p pbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 5.51+-1.50+-0.46E-7 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R01
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BF reports 1.36+-0.16+-0.14E-3 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 8.6+-1.3E-4, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R01
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AG reports [G(h_c(1P) --> pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 1.38+-0.35+-0.17E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R01
text:
ADAMS 2009   reports [G(h_c(1P) --> pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 0.19E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R28
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BF reports <4.0E-4 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 8.6+-1.3E-4, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R11
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> pi+ pi- pi0 eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 6.2+-1.6+-0.7E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R26
text:
ABLIKIM 2024R  reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- pi0 eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 5.33+-1.10+-0.56E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R02
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AG reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 6.40+-0.81+-0.87E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R02
text:
ADAMS 2009   reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 1.88+0.48-0.45+0.47-0.30E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R27
text:
ABLIKIM 2024R  reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 4.53E-7 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R03
text:
ABLIKIM 2024R  reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 6.79+-0.83+-0.56E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R03
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AG reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 7.5E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R03
text:
ADAMS 2009   reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 2.5E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R25
text:
ABLIKIM 2024R  reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 2.93+-0.63+-0.26E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R09
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AG reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 0.5E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R12
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 2.8+-0.5+-0.3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R13
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- pi+ pi- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 2.0E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R14
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BF reports 3.26+-0.84+-0.36E-4 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 8.6+-1.3E-4, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R14
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 4.8E-7 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R15
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- pi0 eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 1.8E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R16
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BF reports 3.13+-1.08+-0.38E-4 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 8.6+-1.3E-4, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R16
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 7.5E-7 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R17
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 2K+ 2K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 2.1E-7 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R18
text:
ABLIKIM 2024Y  reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K0S K+- pi-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 5.3+-1.3+-0.4E-7 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R18
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K0S K+- pi-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 4.8E-7 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R19
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K0S K+- pi-+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 2.4+-0.7+-0.3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R06
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BJ reports 3.77+-0.55+-0.29E-4 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4.


pdgid: M144R00
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BJ reports 1.40+-0.11+-0.11E-3 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta^'(958))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4.


pdgid: M144R29
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BJ reports <5.0E-5 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4.


pdgid: M144R2
text:
ABLIKIM 2022AQ reports [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 4.22+0.27-0.26+-0.19E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R2
text:
DOBBS 2008A  reports [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 4.16+-0.30+-0.37E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R2
text:
ABLIKIM 2010B  reports [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 4.58+-0.40+-0.50E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R2
text:
DOBBS 2008A  reports [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 4.19+-0.32+-0.45E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R2
text:
ROSNER 2005   reports [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 4.0+-0.8+-0.7E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057M
text:
From a fit of the phi phi invariant mass with the width of chi_{{c2}}(1P) fixed to the PDG 2016  value.


pdgid: M057G2
text:
Calculated from the measured Gamma(gamma gamma) x B(chi_c2(1S) --> gamma J/psi(1S))  x B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 14.8+-0.3+-0.7 eV, using  B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 11.93+-0.05%.


pdgid: M057G2
text:
The value for Gamma(chi_c2() --> gamma gamma) reported in ACCIARRI 1999E is derived using B(chi_c2() --> gamma J/psi(1S))xB(J/psi(1S)  --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.0162+-0.0014.


pdgid: M057G2
text:
The value for Gamma(chi_c2() --> gamma gamma) reported in ACKERSTAFF,K 1998 is derived using B(chi_c2() --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.135+-0.011 and B(J/psi(1S)  --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.1203+-0.0038.


pdgid: M057G2
text:
The value for Gamma(chi_c2() --> gamma gamma) reported in DOMINICK 1994 is derived using B(chi_c2() --> gamma J/psi(1S))= 0.135+-0.011, B(J/psi(1S)  --> e+ e-) = 0.0627+-0.0020, and B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 0.0597+-0.0025.


pdgid: M057G2
text:
The value for Gamma(chi_c2() --> gamma gamma) reported in BAUER 1993 is derived using B(chi_c2() --> gamma J/psi(1S))= 0.135+-0.011, B(J/psi(1S)  --> e+ e-) = 0.0627+-0.0020, and B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 0.0597+-0.0025.


pdgid: M057P07
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BT reports 1.153+-0.001+-0.063 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R46
text:
HE 2008B  reports 1.87+-0.07+-0.22+-0.13 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> pi+ pi- pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R47
text:
HE 2008B  reports 2.23+-0.11+-0.32+-0.16 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> rho+ pi- pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R58
text:
ABLIKIM 2011A  reports 1.21+-0.05+-0.16E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> 4pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R48
text:
HE 2008B  reports 0.21+-0.03+-0.03+-0.01 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ K- pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R50
text:
HE 2008B  reports 1.41+-0.11+-0.16+-0.10 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R51
text:
HE 2008B  reports 0.42+-0.11+-0.06+-0.03 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> rho- K+ Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R57
text:
HE 2008B  reports 0.30+-0.07+-0.04+-0.02 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)0 K- pi+ --> K- pi+ K0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R52
text:
HE 2008B  reports 0.39+-0.07+-0.05+-0.03 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar0 pi0 --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R53
text:
HE 2008B  reports 0.38+-0.07+-0.04+-0.03 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)- K+ pi0 --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R54
text:
HE 2008B  reports 0.30+-0.07+-0.04+-0.02 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)+ Kbar0 pi- --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R55
text:
HE 2008B  reports 0.13+-0.04+-0.02+-0.01 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ K- eta pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2022Q  reports 1.565+-0.005+-0.048E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R20
text:
Measured using B( psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P) ) = 9.75+-0.24E-2 and  B( phi --> K+ K- ) =  49.2+-0.5E-2  from   PDG 2022.


pdgid: M057R97
text:
ABLIKIM 2020B  reports 5.33+-0.52+-0.39E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> phi phi eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R28
text:
ABLIKIM 2011K  reports 8.9+-0.3+-1.1E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> omega omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R28
text:
ABLIKIM 2005N  reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> omega omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.165+-0.044+-0.032E-3 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R63
text:
ABLIKIM 2019J  reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> omega phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.91+-0.23+-0.12E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R63
text:
ABLIKIM 2011K  reports <2E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> omega phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R84
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 2.1+-0.4+-0.2E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> pi+ pi- pi0  (non-resonant))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R85
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 0.64+-0.39+-0.07E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> rho(770)+- pi-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R08
text:
ATHAR 2007   reports 0.49+-0.12+-0.06E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R08
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R  reports <1.7E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.1+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R35
text:
ATHAR 2007   reports 0.51+-0.18+-0.06E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 1.5+-0.1+-0.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 1.8+-0.2+-0.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 1.4+-0.2+-0.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R87
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 1.3+-0.2+-0.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R88
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 15.5+-0.6+-1.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_2^*(1430)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R88
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 18.2+-0.8+-1.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_2^*(1430)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R88
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 13.6+-0.8+-1.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_2^*(1430)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R89
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 13.0+-1.0+-1.5E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_2^*(1430)0 Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R90
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 5.4+-0.5+-0.7E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_3^*(1780)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R90
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 5.3+-0.5+-0.9E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_3^*(1780)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R90
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 5.9+-1.1+-1.5E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_3^*(1780)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R91
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 5.9+-1.6+-1.5E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_3^*(1780)0 Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R92
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 13.5+-1.6+-3.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> a_2(1320)0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R93
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 18.4+-3.3+-5.5E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> a_2(1320)+- pi-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R05
text:
ATHAR 2007   reports 0.31+-0.07+-0.04E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R09
text:
ATHAR 2007   reports <0.33E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ K- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R78
text:
Derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (8.72+-0.34)%. Uncertainty includes  both statistical and systematic contributions combined in quadrature.


pdgid: M057R03
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AI reports 2.27+-0.43+-0.25E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> eta eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R03
text:
ASNER 2009   reports <0.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> eta eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R03
text:
ADAMS 2007   reports <2.3E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> eta eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 0.0933+-0.0014+-0.0061, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R04
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AI reports 4.76+-0.56+-0.38E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> eta^' eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R04
text:
ASNER 2009   reports <1.0E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> eta^' eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R04
text:
ADAMS 2007   reports <3.1E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> eta^' eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 0.0933+-0.0014+-0.0061, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R31
text:
ABLIKIM 2005O  reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> pi+ pi- K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.207+-0.039+-0.033E-3 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R32
text:
ABLIKIM 2005O  reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ K- K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] < 3.5E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R94
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AA reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K0S K0S K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 10.8+-1.5+-0.8E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R01
text:
ABLIKIM 2006T  reports 1.67+-0.26+-0.24E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ K- phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.1+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R06
text:
ONYISI 2010   reports 4.83+-0.25+-0.35+-0.31E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R06
text:
ATHAR 2007   reports 0.44+-0.08+-0.05E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R34
text:
ONYISI 2010   reports 1.76+-0.23+-0.14+-0.11E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R34
text:
ATHAR 2007   reports 0.19+-0.07+-0.02E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R56
text:
ONYISI 2010   reports 3.68+-0.35+-0.26+-0.24E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R62
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F  reports 3.04+-0.85+-0.43E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R49
text:
HE 2008B  reports 0.08+-0.02+-0.01+-0.01 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R59
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F  reports 2.08+-0.19+-0.30E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar K+ K-  (non-resonant))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R33
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J  reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p nbar pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.80+-0.02+-0.09E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R33
text:
ABLIKIM 2006I  reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p nbar pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.97+-0.20+-0.26E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R70
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J  reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> pbar n pi+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.85+-0.02+-0.07E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R71
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J  reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p nbar pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 2.07+-0.06+-0.15E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R72
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J  reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> pbar n pi+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 2.01+-0.06+-0.16E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R29
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I  reports 137.0+-7.6+-15.7E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Lambda Lambdabar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R65
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I  reports 71.8+-14.5+-8.2E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Lambda Lambdabar pi+ pi-  (non-resonant))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R66
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I  reports <42E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma(1385)+ Lambdabar pi- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R67
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I  reports <61E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma(1385)- Lambdabar pi+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R07
text:
ABLIKIM 2013D  reports 8.4+-0.3+-0.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda  + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R07
text:
ATHAR 2007   reports 8.5+-1.4+-1.0E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda  + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057P01
text:
ABLIKIM 2021AV reports 3.58+-0.16+-0.23E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> n K0S Lambdabar  + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 0.0952+-0.0020, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R98
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AU reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)+ pbar Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 7.8+-0.9+-0.6E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R60
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F  reports 3.06+-0.50+-0.54E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda(1520) + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R61
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F  reports 5.05+-1.29+-0.93E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Lambda(1520) Lambdabar(1520))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R43
text:
ABLIKIM 2018V  reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.35+-0.05+-0.02E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R43
text:
ABLIKIM 2013H  reports <0.65E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R43
text:
NAIK 2008   reports <0.75E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R44
text:
ABLIKIM 2018V  reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.32+-0.06+-0.03E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R44
text:
ABLIKIM 2013H  reports <0.88E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R44
text:
NAIK 2008   reports <0.67E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057P11
text:
ABLIKIM 2024CA reports 5.46+-1.18+-0.50E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R99
text:
ABLIKIM 2020I  reports 4.4+-1.7+-0.5E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma- Sigmabar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R68
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I  reports <17E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma(1385)+ Sigmabar(1385)-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R69
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I  reports <8.5E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma(1385)- Sigmabar(1385)+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R81
text:
ABLIKIM 2015I  reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K- Lambda Xibar+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 1.68+-0.26+-0.15E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R45
text:
ABLIKIM 2022O  reports 1.83+-0.15+-0.16E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Xi0 Xibar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R45
text:
NAIK 2008   reports <1.06E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Xi0 Xibar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R17
text:
ABLIKIM 2022O  reports 1.44+-0.06+-0.11E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Xi- Xibar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R17
text:
NAIK 2008   reports 1.45+-0.30+-0.15E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Xi- Xibar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R40
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E  reports <20.8E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma rho0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R40
text:
BENNETT 2008A  reports <50E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma rho0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.1+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R41
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E  reports <6.1E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R41
text:
BENNETT 2008A  reports <7.0E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.1+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R42
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E  reports <8.1E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R42
text:
BENNETT 2008A  reports <13E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.1+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R82
text:
ABLIKIM 2017I  reports 2.48+-0.08+-0.16E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> e+ e- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R83
text:
Uses  B( psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P) ) x B( chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S) )  = 199.6+-0.8+-7.0E-4 from ABLIKIM 2017N and accounts for common systematic errors.


pdgid: M057B5
text:
Calculated by us.  The value for B(chi_c2() --> 2pi+ 2pi-) reported in BAI 1999B is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (7.8+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M057B5
text:
The value for B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2())xB(chi_c2() --> 2pi+ pi-) reported in TANENBAUM 1978 is derived using B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)xB(J/psi(1S) lepton+ lepton-) = (4.6+-0.7)%. Calculated by us using B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.1181+-0.0020.


pdgid: M057P08
text:
Calculated by us. The value given here is derived from the value of B(chi_c2() --> 2(pi+ pi-)) reported  in ABLIKIM 2024BT using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (9.52+-0.20)%  [PDG 2022].


pdgid: M057B16
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c2() --> phi phi) reported by ABLIKIM 2011K was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = (8.74+-0.35)%.


pdgid: M057B16
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c2() --> phi phi) reported by ABLIKIM 2006T was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = (8.1+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M057B17
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c2() --> phi phi) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = (7.8+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M057B02
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2010A reports B(chi_c2() --> pi0 pi0) = 0.88+-0.02+-0.06+-0.04E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (8.3+-0.4)%. We have multiplied the pi0 pi0 measurement by 3 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M057B02
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c2() --> pi+ pi-) = 1.59+-0.04+-0.07+-0.10E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2() ) = (9.33+-0.14+-0.61)%. We have multiplied the pi+ pi- measurement by 3/2 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M057B02
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c2() --> pi0 pi0) = 0.68+-0.03+-0.07+-0.04E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2() ) = (9.33+-0.14+-0.61)%. We have multiplied the pi0 pi0 measurement by 3 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M057B9
text:
Calculated by us. The value for B(chi_c2() --> pi+ pi-) reported by BAI 1998I is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (7.8+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D]. We have multiplied pi+ pi- measurement by 3/2 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M057B04
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2010A reports B(chi_c2() --> eta eta) = 0.65+-0.04+-0.05+-0.03E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (8.3+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M057B03
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c2() --> K+ K-) = 1.13+-0.03+-0.06+-0.07E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2() ) = (9.33+-0.14+-0.61)%.


pdgid: M057B8
text:
Calculated by us. The value for B(chi_c2() --> K+ K-) reported by BAI 1998I is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (7.8+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M057B12
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c2() --> K0S K0S) = 0.53+-0.03+-0.03+-0.03E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2() ) = (9.33+-0.14+-0.61)%.


pdgid: M057B13
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c2() --> K0S K0S) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = (7.8+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M057B05
text:
Calculated by us. ATHAR 2007 reports  B(chi_c2() --> Kbar0 K+ pi-  + c.c.) = 1.3+-0.2+-0.1+-0.1E-3  using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (9.33+-0.14+-0.61)%.


pdgid: M057B05
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2006R reports B(chi_c2() --> K0S K()+- pi()-+) = 0.6+-0.2+-0.1E-3 using  B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (8.1+-0.6)%. We have multiplied by 2 to obtain  Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c. from K0S K()+- pi()-+.


pdgid: M057B14
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c2() --> 2K+ 2K-) reported by ABLIKIM 2006T was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = (8.1+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M057B15
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c2() --> 2K+ 2K-) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = (7.8+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M057B1
text:
Calculated by us.  The value for B(chi_c2() --> p pbar) reported in BAI 1998I is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (7.8+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M057B6
text:
Calculated by us. NAIK 2008 reports B(chi_c2() --> p pbar) = 7.7+-0.8+-0.4+-0.5E-5 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (9.33+-0.14+-0.61)%.


pdgid: M057B10
text:
Calculated by us. NAIK 2008 reports B(chi_c2() --> Lambda Lambdabar) = 17.0+-2.2+-1.1+-1.1E-5 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (9.33+-0.14+-0.61)%.


pdgid: M057B10
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2013H reports B(chi_c2() --> Lambda Lambdabar) = 20.8+-1.6+-2.3E-5  from a measurement of B(chi_c2() --> Lambda Lambdabar) x B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (8.74+-0.35)%.


pdgid: M057B11
text:
BAI 2003E reports [ B(chi_c2() --> Lambda Lambdabar) B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) / B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) ] x [B**2(Lambda --> pi- p) / B(J/psi --> p pbar) ] =  (1.33+0.59-0.55+-0.25)%. We calculate from this measurement the presented value using  B(Lambda --> pi- p) = (63.9+-0.5)% and B(J/psi --> p pbar) = 2.17+-0.07E-3.


pdgid: M057P06
text:
Calculated by us. The authors report B(chi_c2 --> Lambda Lambdabar omega) obtained from a  product using PDG 2022 value of B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2).


pdgid: M057B07
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2019BB reports B(chi_c2 --> Sigma+ pbar K0S  + c.c.) =  8.25+-0.83+-0.49E-5 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2) = (9.52+-0.20)%   and other branching fractions from PDG 2018.


pdgid: M057P00
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2020AE reports B(chi_c2 --> Sigma0 pbar K+  + c.c.) = 0.91+-0.06+-0.05E-4  using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2) = (9.52+-0.20)% and other branching fractions  from PDG 2020.


pdgid: M057B3
text:
The value for B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2())xB(chi_c2() --> gamma J/psi(1S)) reported in HIMEL 1980 is derived using B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (33+-3)% and B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.138+-0.018. Calculated by us using B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (0.1181+-0.0020).


pdgid: M057B4
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AE measures the ratio of two-photon partial widths for the helicity  lambda = 0 and helicity lambda = 2 components to be  f(0/2) = Gamma(gamma gamma)**lambda=0 /  Gamma(gamma gamma)**lambda=2 = 0.000+-0.006+-0.012.


pdgid: M057B4
text:
ABLIKIM 2012A measures the ratio of two-photon partial widths for the helicity lambda = 0 and helicity lambda = 2 components to be f(0/2) = Gamma(gammagamma)**lambda=0/Gamma(gammagamma)**lambda=2 = 0.00+-0.02+-0.02. Superseded by ABLIKIM 2017AE.


pdgid: M057B06
text:
Not independent from the values of Gamma(chi_{{c0}}(), chi_{{c2}}()) and B(psi(2S) --> chi_c0(), chi_{{c2}}()).


pdgid: M057A1
text:
Correlated with a_{{3}}, b_{{2}}, and b_{{3}} with correlation coefficients rho(a_2 a_3) =  0.733, rho(a_2 b_2) = -0.605, and rho(a_2 b_3) = -0.095.


pdgid: M057A2
text:
Correlated with a_{{2}}, b_{{2}}, and b_{{3}} with correlation coefficients rho(a_2 a_3) =  0.733, rho(a_3 b_2) = -0.422, and rho(a_3 b_3) = -0.024.


pdgid: M057QB2
text:
Correlated with a_{{2}}, a_{{3}}, and b_{{3}} with correlation coefficients rho(a_2 b_2) =  -0.605, rho(a_3 b_2) = -0.422, and rho(b_2 b_3) = 0.384.


pdgid: M057QB3
text:
Correlated with a_{{2}}, a_{{3}}, and b_{{2}} with correlation coefficients rho(a_2 b_3) =  -0.095, rho(a_3 b_3) = -0.024, and rho(b_2 b_3) = 0.384.


pdgid: M057QAR
text:
Statistical and systematic errors combined. From a fit with floating M2 amplitudes a(2) and b(2), and fixed E3 amplitudes a(3)=b(3)=0. Not independent of values for a(2)(chi_{{c2}}(1P)) and b(2)(chi_{{c2}}(1P)) from ARTUSO 2009.


pdgid: M059M
text:
AAIJ 2017AD report mass(psi(2S))-mass(eta_{{c}}(2S)) = 52.5+-1.7+-0.6 MeV. We use the  current value mass(psi(2S)) = 3686.097+-0.025 MeV to obtain the quoted mass.


pdgid: M059M
text:
From a fit of the phi phi invariant mass with the width of eta_{{c}}(2S) fixed to the PDG 2016  value.


pdgid: M059W1
text:
They measure Gamma(eta_c(2S) gamma gamma)  B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi) = (0.18+-0.05+-0.02) Gamma(eta_c(1S) gamma gamma) B(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi). The value for Gamma(eta_c(2S) --> gamma gamma) is derived assuming that the branching fractions for eta_{{c }}(2S) and eta_{{c }}(1S) decays to K_S K pi are equal and using Gamma(eta_c(1S) --> gamma gamma) = 7.4+-0.4+-2.3 keV.


pdgid: M059G04
text:
NAKAZAWA 2008 reports B(eta_c(2S) --> K0S K+- pi-+) x Gamma(gamma gamma)  = 11.2+-2.4+-2.7 eV which we multiplied by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M059R3
text:
Derived from a measurement of [B(B+ --> eta_c(2S) K+) x B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi)] / [B(B+ --> eta_c() K+) x B(eta_c() --> K Kbar pi)] = (9.6+2.0-1.9+-2.5)% and using B(B+ --> eta_c(2S) K+) = 3.4+-1.8E-4, and [B(B+ --> eta_c() K+) x B(eta_c() --> K Kbar pi)] = 6.88+-0.77+0.55-0.66E-5.


pdgid: M059R26
text:
LEES 2014E reports B(eta_c(2S) --> K+ K- eta)/B(eta_c(2S) --> K+ K- pi0) = 0.82+-0.21+-0.27, which we divide by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M059R21
text:
Not independent from other measurements reported in DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011M. We have multiplied  the value of Gamma(K+ K- pi+ pi- pi0)/Gamma(K0S K()+- pi()-+) reported in  DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011M by a factor 1/3 to obtain .


pdgid: M059R04
text:
AAIJ 2017AD report a 6.4 standard deviation signal, with B(B+ --> eta_c(2S) K+ --> p pbar K+)/B(B+ --> J/psi K+ --> p pbar K+) =  1.58+-0.33+-0.09E-2.


pdgid: M059R30
text:
CHILIKIN 2019  reports signals in B+ --> eta_c(2S) K+ and B0 --> eta_c(2S) K0S with  12.3 and 5.9 standard deviations, respectively.


pdgid: M059R2
text:
WICHT 2008   reports [G(eta_c(2S) --> gamma gamma)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> eta_c(2S) K+)] < 0.18E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> eta_c(2S) K+) = 4.4E-4.


pdgid: M059R25
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BW reports a value of 2.39+-0.32+-0.34E-6 for the decay eta_c(2S) --> K+ K- eta  which we multiply by 2 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M059R25
text:
CRONIN-HENNESSY 2010 reports a limit of <5.9E-6 for the decay eta_c(2S) --> K+ K- eta  which we multiply by 2 account for isospin symmetry. It assumes Gamma(eta_{{c}}(2S)) = 14 MeV. It also gives the analytic dependence of limits on width.


pdgid: M059R05
text:
Assuming Gamma(eta_{{c}}(2S)) = 14 MeV. CRONIN-HENNESSY 2010 gives the analytic dependence of limits on width.


pdgid: M071M
text:
Mass central value and systematic error recalculated by us according to Eq.(16) in ARMSTRONG 1993B, using the value for the J/psi(1S) mass from AULCHENKO 2003.


pdgid: M071M
text:
From a fit of a relativistic S-wave Breit-Wigner convolved with the detector resolution. The  width of psi(2S) is constrained to the PDG 2022 value. Systematic errors not evaluated.


pdgid: M071M
text:
From the scans in 2004 and 2006. ANASHIN 2012 reports the value 3686.114+-0.007+-0.011+0.002-0.012 MeV, where the third uncertainty is due to assumptions on the interference between the resonance and hadronic continuum. We combined the two systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: M071W
text:
From a simultaneous fit to the hadronic and mu+ mu- cross section, assuming Gamma = Gamma(h) + Gamma(e) + Gamma(mu) + Gamma(tau) and lepton universality. Does not include vacuum polarization correction.


pdgid: M071W1
text:
ABLIKIM 2015V  reports 2.213+-0.018+-0.099 keV from a measurement of [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] * [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.95+-0.45E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.69+-0.34E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071W1
text:
From a simultaneous fit to e+ e-, mu+ mu-, and hadronic channel, assuming Gamma(e) = Gamma(mu) = Gamma(tau)/0.38847.


pdgid: M071W1
text:
Combining Gamma(e+ e-).B(mu+ mu-) from ANASHIN 2018 with  Gamma(e+ e-).B(hadrons) from ANASHIN 2012 and assuming lepton  universality.


pdgid: M071W1
text:
From the sum of Gamma(e+ e-).B(hadrons) from ANASHIN 2012,  Gamma(e+ e-).B(e+ e-) and Gamma(e+ e-).B(mu+ mu-) from  ANASHIN 2018, and  Gamma(e+ e-).B(tau+ tau-) from ANASHIN 2007.


pdgid: M071G3
text:
ANASHIN 2012 reports the value 2.233+-0.015+-0.037+-0.020 keV, where the third uncertainty is due to assumptions on the interference between the resonance and hadronic continuum. We combined the two systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: M071G1
text:
LEES 2023   reports [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+)] = 4.14+-0.55+-0.29E-3 keV which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 5.3+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071G1
text:
LEES 2012E  reports [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 49.9+-1.3+-1.0E-3 keV which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071G1
text:
The value of Gamma(e+ e-) quoted in BAI 1998E is derived using B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)= 32.4+-2.6E-2 and B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-)= 0.1203+-0.0038. Recalculated by us using B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-)= 0.1181+-0.0020.


pdgid: M071G1
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 0.0186+-0.0012+-0.0011 keV which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 2.00+-0.07E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071G1
text:
AUBERT 2005D  reports [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 0.0450+-0.0018+-0.0022 keV which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071G6
text:
LEES 2023   reports [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi0 pi0) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> K+ K- pi0)] = 1.31+-0.35+-0.13E-3 keV which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> K+ K- pi0) = 2.88+-0.12E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071G6
text:
LEES 2023   reports [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi0 pi0) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+)] = 2.36+-0.59+-0.24E-3 keV which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 5.3+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071G6
text:
LEES 2018E  reports [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi0 pi0) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 0.0101+-0.0015+-0.0011 keV which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 2.00+-0.07E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071G7
text:
AUBERT 2007AU quotes Gamma()**psi(2S).B(psi(2S) --> J/psi eta) . B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) . B(eta --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 1.11+-0.33+-0.07 eV.


pdgid: M071G03
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(psi(2S) --> eta 2(pi+ pi-)) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] = 1.13+-0.55+-0.08 eV which we divide by our best value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071G03
text:
LEES 2021   reports [G(psi(2S) --> eta 2(pi+ pi-)) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 3pi0)] < 2.3 eV which we divide by our best value B(eta --> 3pi0) = 32.56E-2.


pdgid: M071P40
text:
LEES 2021C  reports [G(psi(2S) --> eta pi+ pi- 3pi0) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] < 1.9 eV which we divide by our best value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36E-2.


pdgid: M071P33
text:
LEES 2021   reports [G(psi(2S) --> eta 2(pi+ pi- pi0)) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] < 1.9 eV which we divide by our best value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36E-2.


pdgid: M071G02
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(psi(2S) --> omega pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 2.69+-0.73+-0.16 eV which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071P32
text:
LEES 2021   reports [G(psi(2S) --> omega pi+ pi- 2pi0) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 18+-4+-3 eV which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071P17
text:
LEES 2018E  reports [G(psi(2S) --> omega pi0 pi0) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 2.3+-0.7+-0.2 eV which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071P39
text:
LEES 2021C  reports [G(psi(2S) --> omega 3pi0) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] < 1.6 eV which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2E-2.


pdgid: M071G10
text:
LEES 2012F  reports [G(psi(2S) --> phi pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.27+-0.09+-0.02 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071G10
text:
AUBERT,BE 2006D  reports [G(psi(2S) --> phi pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.28+-0.11+-0.02 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071G13
text:
LEES 2012F  reports [G(psi(2S) --> phi f_0(980) --> pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.17+-0.06+-0.02 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071G13
text:
AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(psi(2S) --> phi f_0(980) --> pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.17+-0.08+-0.02 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071G05
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(psi(2S) --> K+ K- pi+ pi- eta) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] = 1.2+-0.7+-0.1 eV which we divide by our best value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071R5
text:
Using B(psi(2S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (0.794+-0.017)% and R = 2.26+-0.01  determined by a fit to data from Mark-I, DM2, BESII, KEDR, and BESIII.


pdgid: M071R5
text:
Using B(psi(2S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (0.73+-0.04)% from RPP-2002 and  R = 2.28+-0.04 determined by a fit to data from BAI 2000 and BAI 2002C. Superseded  by LIAO 2023.


pdgid: M071S43
text:
Calculated using Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(g g g) = 0.097+-0.026+-0.016 from LIBBY 2009, B(psi(2S) --> X J/psi) relative and absolute branching fractions from MENDEZ 2008, B(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c) from MITCHELL 2009, and B(psi(2S) --> virtual gamma --> hadrons), B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_cJ()), and B(psi(2S) --> lepton+ lepton-) from PDG 2008. The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is largely uncorrelated with that of Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(total) LIBBY 2009 measurement.


pdgid: M071S44
text:
Calculated using Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(g g g) = 0.097+-0.026+-0.016 from LIBBY 2009. The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is largely uncorrelated with that of  Gamma(g g g)/Gamma(total) LIBBY 2009 measurement.


pdgid: M071S27
text:
Uses B(J/psi X) from ADAM 2005A, B(chi_cJ() gamma), B(eta_c gamma)  from ATHAR 2004 and B(lepton+ lepton-) from PDG 2004. Superseded by MENDEZ 2008.


pdgid: M071R1
text:
From an overall fit assuming equal partial widths for e+ e- and mu+ mu-.  For a measurement of the ratio see the entry G(psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-)/G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) below. Includes LUTH 1975, HILGER 1975, BURMESTER 1977.


pdgid: M071R75
text:
Computed using PDG 2002 value of B(psi(2S) --> hadrons) = 0.9810+-0.0030 to estimate the total number of psi(2S) events.


pdgid: M071R10
text:
From a fit to the e+ e- --> J/psi X cross section between 3.645 and 3.891 GeV, with Gamma(ee)  and Gamma fixed to the PDG 2020 values of the cross particle fit which are correlated  to "OUR FIT" value for B(psi(2S) --> J/psi X).


pdgid: M071R71
text:
The value for B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1s) eta) reported in HIMEL 1980 is derived using B(psi(2S)) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (33+-3))% and B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.138+-0.018. Calculated by us using B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (0.1181+-0.0020).


pdgid: M071R20
text:
Obtained by analyzing CLEO-c data but not authored by the CLEO Collaboration. Using psi(3770) --> pi+ pi- for continuum subtraction.


pdgid: M071R22
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(psi(2S) --> 2(pi+ pi-) pi0)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] = 297+-22+-18E-4 keV which we divide by our best value [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 2.33+-0.04 keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071R93
text:
Destructive-interference solution of a partial wave analysis of the decay psi(2S) --> pi+ pi- eta^'.


pdgid: M071R93
text:
Constructive-interference solution of a partial wave analysis of the decay psi(2S) --> pi+ pi- eta^' .


pdgid: M071R77
text:
AUBERT 2007AU quotes Gamma()**psi(2S).B(psi(2S) --> omega pi+ pi-) . B(omega --> 3pi) = 2.69+-0.73+-0.16eV.


pdgid: M071R80
text:
AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(psi(2S) --> phi pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] = 0.57+-0.22+-0.04E-3 keV which we divide by our best value [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 2.33+-0.04 keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071R83
text:
AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(psi(2S) --> phi f_0(980) --> pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] = 0.34+-0.16+-0.04E-3 keV which we divide by our best value [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 2.33+-0.04 keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071P60
text:
Data at 3.773 GeV assumed to be e+ e- (3.773) --> 3 phi events yield an estimate for the  continuum amplitude at the psi(2S). No interference between the psi(2S) and continuum  amplitudes is assumed.


pdgid: M071P22
text:
ABLIKIM 2019BA reports [G(psi(2S) --> phi f_1(1285))/G(total)] * [B(f_1(1285) --> eta pi+ pi-)] = 1.03+-0.10+-0.09E-5 which we divide by our best value B(f_1(1285) --> eta pi+ pi-) = 35+-15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071R24
text:
AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(psi(2S) --> K+ K- pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] = 2.56+-0.42+-0.16E-3 keV which we divide by our best value [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 2.33+-0.04 keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071S10
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(psi(2S) --> K+ K- pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] = 44+-13+-3E-4 keV which we divide by our best value [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 2.33+-0.04 keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071S39
text:
AUBERT 2007AU quotes Gamma()**psi(2S).B(psi(2S) --> 2(pi+ pi) eta) .B(eta --> gamma gamma) = 1.2+-0.7+-0.1eV.


pdgid: M071P57
text:
LEES 2023   reports [G(psi(2S) --> eta K+ K-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 3pi0)] < 0.2 eV which we divide by our best value B(eta --> 3pi0) = 32.56E-2.


pdgid: M071S73
text:
Statistical signficance 4.5 sigma. This measurement is equivalent to a limit of <0.478E-5 at 90% C.L.


pdgid: M071S74
text:
Statistical signficance 3.2 sigma. This measurement is equivalent to a limit of <0.221E-5 at 90% C.L.


pdgid: M071S50
text:
From a fit of the p pbar and p pi0 mass distributions to a combination of N(1440) pbar,  a broad p pbar enhancement around 2100 MeV, and two other broad, unestablished resonances.


pdgid: M071S53
text:
From a fit of the p pbar and p eta distributions to a combination of N^*(1535) pbar and  a broad p pbar enhancement around 2100 MeV.


pdgid: M071R28
text:
AUBERT 2007BD reports [G(psi(2S) --> Lambda Lambdabar)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] = 15+-4+-1E-4 keV which we divide by our best value [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 2.33+-0.04 keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071S42
text:
Assuming a width Gamma(h_{{c}}(1P)) = 0.86 MeV == Gamma_{{0}}(), a measured dependence of the central value of B = (7.6 +1.4 x Gamma(h_{{c}}(1P)/Gamma_{{0}}()) x E-4, and with a systematic error that  accounts for the width variation range 0.43 -- 1.29 MeV.


pdgid: M071R62
text:
ABLIKIM 2024J  reports [G(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(2S))/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi)] = 0.97+-0.06+-0.09E-5 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi) = 1.9+1.2-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071R62
text:
ABLIKIM 2012G  reports [G(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(2S))/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi)] = 1.30+-0.20+-0.30E-5 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi) = 1.9+1.2-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071R62
text:
This measurement assumes Gamma(eta_{{c}}(2S)) = 14 MeV. CRONIN-HENNESSY 2010 gives the analytic dependence of limits on width.


pdgid: M071R62
text:
CRONIN-HENNESSY 2010   reports [G(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(2S))/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi)] < 14.5E-6 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi) = 1.9E-2.


pdgid: M071R42
text:
Taking into account interference between psi(2S) and continuum amplitudes. Range of the  1sigma contour in the plane of B(psi(2S) --> gamma pi0) versus phi, the relative  phase of the amplitudes. The fit provides two solutions for B(psi(2S) --> gamma pi0): 3.74E-7  (phi = 3.93 rad) and 7.87E-7 (phi = 2.08 rad).


pdgid: M071R84
text:
DOBBS 2015   reports [G(psi(2S) --> gamma f_2(1270))/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] = 2.39+-0.09+-0.09E-4 which we divide by our best value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3+2.8-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071S76
text:
DOBBS 2015   reports [G(psi(2S) --> gamma f_0(1500))/G(total)] * [B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi)] = 3.2+-0.6+-0.2E-5 which we divide by our best value B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi) = 34.5+-2.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071S77
text:
DOBBS 2015   reports [G(psi(2S) --> gamma f_2^'(1525))/G(total)] * [B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar)] = 2.9+-0.6+-0.3E-5 which we divide by our best value B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8+-2.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071R86
text:
Includes unknown branching fractions to K+ K- or K0S K0S. We have multiplied the K+ K- result by a factor of 2 and the  K0S K0S result by a factor of 4 to obtain the K Kbar result.


pdgid: M071S80
text:
For Gamma = 20/50 MeV, the 90% CL upper limits for pi+ pi- and pi0 pi0 are 3.2/4.3E-6 and 2.6/4.0E-6, respectively.


pdgid: M071S81
text:
For Gamma = 20/50 MeV, the 90% CL upper limits for K+ K- and K0S K0S are 2.1/4.3E-6 and 3.7/5.5E-6, respectively.


pdgid: M071S33
text:
From a fit of the p pbar mass distribution to a combination of gamma f_2(1950), gamma f_2(2150),  and gamma p pbar phase space, for M(p pbar < 2.85 GeV, and accounting for backgrounds from  psi(2S) --> pi0 p pbar and continuum.


pdgid: M071S55
text:
Uses B( J/psi --> e+ e-  ) = (5.971+-0.032)% and B( J/psi --> mu+ mu-  ) =  (5.961+-0.033)%.  No systematic error estimation.


pdgid: M071P01
text:
ABLIKIM 2017I  reports 11.7+-2.5+-1.0E-4 from a measurement of [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e- chi_c0(1P))/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 1.27+-0.06E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 1.41+-0.09E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071P02
text:
ABLIKIM 2017I  reports 8.6+-0.3+-0.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e- chi_c1(1P))/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 33.9+-1.2E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071P05
text:
Uses B( psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P) ) x B( chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S) )  = 351.8+-1.0+-12.0E-4 from ABLIKIM 2017N and accounts for common systematic errors.


pdgid: M071P03
text:
ABLIKIM 2017I  reports 6.9+-0.5+-0.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e- chi_c2(1P))/G(total)] * [B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 19.2+-0.7E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 19.5+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071QAR
text:
Statistical and systematic errors combined. Using values from fits with floating M2 amplitudes a(2)(chi_{{c1}}()), a(2)(chi_{{c2}}()), b(2)(chi_{{c1}}()),  b(2)(chi_{{c2}}()) and fixed E3 amplitudes of a(3)(chi_{{c2}}()) = b(3)(chi_{{c2}}()) = 0. Not independent of values for a(2)(chi_{{c1}}(1P)) and a(2)(chi_{{c2}}(1P)) from ARTUSO 2009.


pdgid: M071QBR
text:
Statistical and systematic errors combined. Derived from the reported measurement of  b_{{2}}(chi_{{c1}})/b_{{2}}(chi_{{c2}}) = 1.35+-0.72.


pdgid: M071QBR
text:
Statistical and systematic errors combined. Using values from fits with floating M2 amplitudes a(2)(chi_{{c1}}()), a(2)(chi_{{c2}}()), b(2)(chi_{{c1}}()),  b(2)(chi_{{c2}}()) and fixed E3 amplitudes of a(3)(chi_{{c2}}()) = b(3)(chi_{{c2}}()) = 0. Not independent of values for b(2)(chi_{{c1}}(1P)) and b(2)(chi_{{c2}}(1P)) from ARTUSO 2009.


pdgid: M053M
text:
Real part of pole location extracted using K-matrix formalism that includes two resonance poles,  psi(2S) and psi(3770).


pdgid: M053M
text:
From the joint analysis of the data on the D Dbar and inclusive hadronic cross sections in the  psi(3770) region from BaBar, Belle, BES-II, CLEO and KEDR.


pdgid: M053M
text:
Reanalysis of data presented in BAI 2002C. From a global fit over the center-of-mass energy region  3.7 -- 5.0 GeV covering the psi(3770), psi(4040), psi(4160), and psi(4415) resonances.  Phase angle fixed in the fit to delta = 0degree.


pdgid: M053W
text:
-2 x imaginary part of pole location extracted using K-matrix formalism that  includes two resonance poles, psi(2S) and psi(3770).


pdgid: M053P03
text:
Interference effect between resonance and continuum amplitudes is considered. Two solutions from  the fit.


pdgid: M053P04
text:
A fit to the Born cross section of e+ e- --> Lambda Xibar+ K- + c.c. including  interference with the continuum.  Two solutions from the fit.


pdgid: M053P05
text:
A fit to the Born cross section of e+ e- --> Sigma0 Xibar+ K- + c.c. including  interference with the continuum.  Two solutions from the fit.


pdgid: M053R1
text:
Obtained by comparing a measurement of the total cross section (corrected in BESSON 2010) with that of D Dbar reported by CLEO in DOBBS 2007.


pdgid: M053R1
text:
From a measurement of CS(e+ e- --> D Dbar) at sqrt(s) = 3773 MeV, using the psi(3770) resonance parameters measured by ABLIKIM 2006L.


pdgid: M053P00
text:
From a fit to the e+ e- --> J/psi X cross section between 3.645 and 3.891 GeV, with psi(2S)  and psi(3770) masses, total widths and leptonic widths fixed to the values from the  PDG 2020. An  alternative fit with an improved chi^2, corresponding to a significance of  5.3 sigma,  uses an additional resonance with a mass of 3766.2+-3.8+-0.4 MeV/c**2,  a total width of  22.2+-5.9+-1.4 MeV, and Gamma(e e).B(J/psi X) = 79.4+-85.5+-11.7 eV,  possibly compatible with the results of ABLIKIM 2008H.


pdgid: M053R8
text:
Incoherent fit. Alternate fits that include interference with background yield results between  11.2+-5.8+-1.1E-4 and 11.6+-6.0+-1.1E-4.


pdgid: M053R82
text:
Comparing cross sections at sqrt(s) = 3.773 GeV and sqrt(s) = 3.671 GeV, neglecting interference, and using CS(psi(3770) --> D Dbar) = 6.39+-0.20 nb.


pdgid: M053R83
text:
ABLIKIM 2023BC fit to e+ e- --> phi eta^' cross sections between 3.508 and 4.951 GeV  considering interference between continuum and psi(3770) amplitudes.


pdgid: M053R83
text:
ADAMS 2006 compare cross sections at sqrt(s) = 3.773 GeV and sqrt(s) = 3.671 GeV,  neglecting interference, and using CS(psi(3770) --> D Dbar) = 6.39+-0.20 nb.


pdgid: M053R6
text:
Assuming that interference effects between resonance and continuum can be neglected and using sigma**obs(e+ e- --> psi(3770)) = 7.15+-0.38 nb.


pdgid: M053R00
text:
DRUZHININ 2015 uses BABAR and CLEO data takitaking into account interference of the processes e+ e- --> K+ K- and e+ e- --> K0S K0L.


pdgid: M053R3
text:
From the 1sigma contour in the B.R. versus phi (relative phase between the  continuum and psi(3770) amplitudes) likelihood scan. Mass, total width and electronic width of  psi(3770) fixed at PDG 2022 values.


pdgid: M053R3
text:
Using CS(e+ e- --> psi(3770) --> hadrons) = (6.38+-0.08+0.41-0.30) nb from BESSON 2006 and B(K0S --> pi+ pi-) = 0.6895+-0.0014.


pdgid: M053R98
text:
AAIJ 2017AD reports B(B+ --> psi(3770) K+ --> p pbar K+)/B(B+ --> J/psi K+ --> p pbar K+)  < 0.09 (0.10) at 90% (95%) CL.


pdgid: M053R09
text:
Calculated by the authors using CS(e+ e- --> psi(3770) --> hadrons) = 6.36+-0.08+0.41-0.30  nb from BESSON 2010.


pdgid: M053R42
text:
From a measurement of the e+ e- --> Lambda Lambdabar cross section between 3.5 and 4.6 GeV.  At a 90% CL the lower bound is >2.4E-6.


pdgid: M053R03
text:
Uses B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46% from ATHAR 2004, psi(2S) mass and width from PDG 2004, and (psi(2S)) = 2.54+-0.03+-0.11keV from ADAM 2006.


pdgid: M053R03
text:
Using (psi(2S)) = (2.54+-0.03+-0.11) keV from ADAM 2006 and taking  CS(e+ e- --> D Dbar) from HE 2005 for CS(e+ e- --> psi(3770)).


pdgid: M053R02
text:
ABLIKIM 2016B  reports 1.94+-0.42+-0.64E-3 from a measurement of [G(psi(3770) --> gamma chi_c1())/G(total)] / [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M053R02
text:
ABLIKIM 2014H  reports [G(psi(3770) --> gamma chi_c1())/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> K0S K+- pi-+)] = 8.51+-2.39+-1.42E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 0.00349+-0.00031. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M053R02
text:
We have calculated the best value of B(chi_c1(1P) --> K0S K+- pi-+) as 1/2 of B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.) = .


pdgid: M053R02
text:
Uses B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54% from ATHAR 2004, psi(2S) mass and width from PDG 2004, and (psi(2S)) = 2.54+-0.03+-0.11keV from ADAM 2006.


pdgid: M053R01
text:
ABLIKIM 2016B  reports 6.88+-0.28+-0.67E-3 from a measurement of [G(psi(3770) --> gamma chi_c0())/G(total)] / [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.99+-0.27E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M053R99
text:
We have calculated the best value of B(eta_c(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+) as 1/3 of B(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi) = .


pdgid: M053R99
text:
ABLIKIM 2014H  reports [G(psi(3770) --> gamma eta_c())/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+)] < 16E-6 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 2.38E-2.


pdgid: M053R20
text:
We have calculated the best value of B(eta_c(2S) --> K0S K+- pi-+) as 1/3 of B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi) = .


pdgid: M053R20
text:
ABLIKIM 2014H  reports [G(psi(3770) --> gamma eta_c(2S))/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(2S) --> K0S K+- pi-+)] < 5.6E-6 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(2S) --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 6.3E-3.


pdgid: M212M
text:
Using the measured mass(psi_{{2}}(3823))-mass(psi(2S)) and assuming mass(psi(2S)) = 3686.097 MeV  from PDG 2022.


pdgid: M212M
text:
From a simultaneous fit to B+- --> ( chi_c1() gamma ) K+- and B0 --> ( chi_c1() gamma ) K0S with significance 4.0sigma including systematics. Corrected for the measured psi(2S) mass using B --> psi(2S) K --> ( gamma chi_c1() ) K decays.


pdgid: M212M
text:
From a simultaneous unbinned maximum likelihood fit of e+ e- --> pi+ pi- chi_c1() gamma data (the   pi+ pi- recoil mass) taken at sqrt(s) values of 4.23, 4.26, 4.36, 4.42, and 4.60 GeV to   simulated events including both psi(2S) --> chi_c1() gamma and psi_2(3823) --> chi_c1() gamma   together, with floating mass scale offset for psi(2S), floating psi_{{2}}(3823) mass, and zero   psi_{{2}}(3823) width, resulting in a significance of 5.9sigma when including systematic   uncertainties. Superseded by ABLIKIM 22R.


pdgid: M212W
text:
From a fit of e+ e- --> pi0 pi0 chi_c1 gamma data at sqrt(s) values from 4.23 to 4.70 GeV to a   Breit-Wigner function with floating width, using the Bayesian approach.


pdgid: M212W
text:
From a fit of e+ e- --> pi+ pi- chi_c1 gamma data (the pi+ pi- recoil mass) taken at  sqrt(s) values of 4.23, 4.26, 4.36, 4.42, and 4.60 GeV to a Breit-Wigner function with the mass  fixed from the likelihood fit above, Gaussian resolution smearing, and floating width.


pdgid: M212W
text:
From a simultaneous fit to B+- --> ( chi_c1() gamma ) K+- and B0 --> ( chi_c1() gamma ) K0S with significance 4.0sigma including systematics.


pdgid: M212R00
text:
From a simultaneous unbinned maximum likelihood fit of the pi+ pi- recoil mass distributions of  seven decay channels in the process e+ e- --> pi+ pi- X.


pdgid: M212R09
text:
From a simultaneous unbinned maximum likelihood fit of the pi+ pi- recoil mass distributions of   seven decay channels in the process e+ e- --> pi+ pi- X.


pdgid: M212R10
text:
Using the branching ratio for B+ --> psi_2(3823) K+ with psi_2(3823) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi- from AAIJ 2020S.


pdgid: M212R01
text:
From a fit to the e+ e- --> pi+ pi- psi(3823) cross section between 4.23 and 4.70 GeV with two  coherent Breit-Wigner resonances. The data is also consistent with a single peak R with mass  4417.5+-26.2+-3.5 MeV and width 245+-48+-13 MeV, which leads to Gamma(e+ e-) B(R --> pi+ pi- psi_2(3823))  B(psi_2(3823) --> chi_c1 gamma) = 0.57+-0.08 eV.


pdgid: M212R01
text:
From a simultaneous unbinned maximum likelihood fit of the pi+ pi- recoil mass distributions of  seven decay channels in the process e+ e- --> pi+ pi- X. Signal has a 11.8 sigma   significance.


pdgid: M212R01
text:
BHARDWAJ 2013 reports B(B+- --> psi_2(3823) K+-) x B(psi_2(3823) --> gamma chi_c1()) =   9.7+-2.8+-1.1E-6 with statistical significance 3.8 sigma.


pdgid: M212R02
text:
From a simultaneous unbinned maximum likelihood fit of the pi+ pi- recoil mass distributions of  seven decay channels in the process e+ e- --> pi+ pi- X. Signal has a 3.2 sigma  significance.


pdgid: M212R02
text:
From a simultaneous unbinned maximum likelihood fit of e+ e- --> pi+ pi- chi_c2 gamma data (the  pi+ pi- recoil mass) taken at sqrt(s) values of 4.23, 4.26, 4.36, 4.42, and 4.60 GeV to  simulated events including both psi(2S) --> chi_c2 gamma and psi_2(3823) --> chi_c2 gamma  together, with floating mass scale offset for psi(2S), psi_{{2}}(3823) mass floating (fixed to  that above), and zero psi_{{2}}(3823) width.


pdgid: M212R02
text:
BHARDWAJ 2013 reports B(B+- --> psi_2(3823) K+-) x B(psi_2(3823) --> gamma chi_c2())  < 3.6E-6 at 90% CL.


pdgid: M212R03
text:
From a simultaneous unbinned maximum likelihood fit of e+ e- --> pi+ pi- chi_c1(2)() gamma data  (the pi+ pi- recoil mass) taken at sqrt(s) values of 4.23, 4.26, 4.36, 4.42, and 4.60 GeV to  simulated events including both psi(2S) --> chi_c1(2)() gamma and psi_2(3823) --> chi_c1(2)() gamma  together, with floating mass scale offset for psi(2S), psi_{{2}}(3823) mass floating (fixed to  that above), and zero psi_{{2}}(3823) width.


pdgid: M176PP
text:
From simultaneous line shape fits of e+ e- --> gamma chi_c1(3872) --> gamma [ D0 Dbar0 pi0 ]  and gamma [ J/psi pi+ pi- ]. The most prominent pole is reported at 7.04+-0.15+0.07-0.08  MeV above the D0 Dbar0 pi0 threshold of 3864.66 MeV on the first sheet with respect to the  D^*()0 Dbar0 channel. The uncertainty in the D0 width is included in the uncertainty of the  pole mass.


pdgid: M176M
text:
Calculated from mass(chi_{{c1}}(3872))-mass(psi(2S)) = 185.54+-0.06 MeV obtained by combining the  data with chi_{{c1}}(3872) produced in B+ decays from AAIJ 2020S and inclusive  b-hadron decays from AAIJ 2020AD and using mass(psi(2S)) = 3686.097 MeV. Breit-Wigner  parametrization.


pdgid: M176M
text:
The mass difference for the chi_{{c1}}(3872) produced in B+ and B0 decays is (-0.71+-0.96+-0.19) MeV.


pdgid: M176M
text:
A possible equal mixture of two states with a mass difference greater than 3.6 MeV/c**2 is excluded at 95% CL.


pdgid: M176M
text:
Calculated from the corresponding mass(chi_{{c1}}(3872)) - mass(J/psi) using mass(J/psi)=3096.916 MeV.


pdgid: M176M
text:
From a fit of a relativistic S-wave Breit-Wigner convolved with the detector resolution. The  width of chi_{{c1}}(3872) is constrained to the PDG 2022 value. Systematic errors not  evaluated.


pdgid: M176M
text:
Using chi_{{c1}}(3872) produced in inclusive b-hadron decays and mass(psi(2S)) = 3686.097+-0.010  MeV. Breit-Wigner parametrization. Superseded by the combined value in AAIJ 2020S.


pdgid: M176M
text:
Calculated from the corresponding mass(chi_{{c1}}(3872))-mass(psi(2S)) using mass(psi(2S)) = 3686.093 MeV.


pdgid: M176M
text:
Calculated from the corresponding mass(chi_{{c1}}(3872))-mass(psi(2S)) using mass(psi(2S)) = 3685.96MeV. Superseded by AUBERT 2006.


pdgid: M176MD0
text:
Calculated from the measured mass(chi_{{c1}}(3872))-mass(D^*()0)-mass(Dbar0) = 1.1+0.6-0.4+0.1-0.3 MeV.


pdgid: M176MD0
text:
Experiments report D^*()0 Dbar0 invariant mass above D^*()0 Dbar0 threshold because D^*()0 decay products are kinematically constrained to the D^*()0 mass, even though the D^*()0 may decay off-shell.


pdgid: M176DM2
text:
Using chi_{{c1}}(3872) produced in inclusive b-hadron decays. Breit-Wigner parametrization.  Superseded by the combined value in AAIJ 2020S.


pdgid: M176DM2
text:
Combining mass(chi_{{c1}}(3872))-mass(psi(2S)) = 185.49+-0.06+-0.03 MeV from AAIJ 2020S  and the measured mass difference from  AAIJ 2020AD. Breit-Wigner parametrization.


pdgid: M176WD0
text:
With a measured value of B(B --> chi_c1(3872) K) x B(chi_c1(3872) --> D^*()0 Dbar0) =  0.80+-0.20+-0.10E-4, assumed to be equal for both charged and neutral modes.


pdgid: M176W1
text:
Fit to cross section using a total width value of 1.19+-0.21 MeV and B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)  )  = (3.8+-1.2)% from PDG 2020.


pdgid: M176W1
text:
ABLIKIM 2015V reports this limit from the measurement of Gamma(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))xGamma(chi_c1(3872) --> e+ e-)/Gamma < 0.13 eV using  Gamma(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))/Gamma = 3%.


pdgid: M176W1
text:
Using BAI 1998E data on e+ e- --> pi+ pi- lepton+ lepton-.  Assuming that Gamma(pi+ pi- J/psi) of chi_{{c1}}(3872) is the same as that of psi(2S) (85.4 keV).


pdgid: M176G1
text:
Using B(chi_c1(3872) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) . B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) . Gamma(chi_c1(3872) --> e+ e-) < 0.37 eV from AUBERT 2005D and B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) = 0.0588+-0.0010 from the PDG 2004.


pdgid: M176G1
text:
Using BAI 1998E data on e+ e- --> pi+ pi- lepton+ lepton-. From theoretical calculation of the production cross section and using B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) = (5.88+-0.10)%.


pdgid: M176H1
text:
Measured in single-tag two-photon production assuming Q^2 dependence of a c cbar meson  model. Here, Gamma(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma gamma) is the reduced two-photon decay width,  Gammatilde(gamma gamma).


pdgid: M176R30
text:
Assuming the decay products, pi+ pi- pi0, are uniformly distributed in phase space.   The limit is the 90% "credible" upper limit (i.e. Bayesian).


pdgid: M176R30
text:
YIN 2023   reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 1.9E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R30
text:
YIN 2023   reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)] < 1.5E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0) = 1.1E-4.


pdgid: M176R6
text:
AAIJ 2020S  reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 7.95+-0.15+-0.33E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R6
text:
CHOI 2011   reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 8.63+-0.82+-0.52E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R6
text:
AUBERT 2008Y  reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 8.4+-1.5+-0.7E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R6
text:
BALA 2015 reports B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi) x B(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K+ pi-) =   7.9+-1.3+-0.4E-6 and B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi) x B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K0 pi+) =   10.6+-3.0+-0.9E-6.


pdgid: M176R6
text:
AUBERT 2005R  reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 1.28+-0.41E-5 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R6
text:
CHOI 2003   reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] / [B(B+ --> psi(2S) K+)] / [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] = 0.063+-0.012+-0.007 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4, B(B+ --> psi(2S) K+) = 6.24+-0.21E-4, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.69+-0.34E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M176R25
text:
WANG 2011B reports B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(3872)) x B(chi_c1 --> pi+ pi- pi0 J/psi)  < 2.4E-6 at 95% CL.


pdgid: M176R25
text:
SHEN 2010A reports B(Upsilon(1S) --> gamma chi_c1(3872)) x B(chi_c1 --> pi+ pi- pi0 J/psi)  < 2.8E-6 at 95% CL.


pdgid: M176R24
text:
VINOKUROVA 2015   reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> omega eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 6.9E-5 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R33
text:
Assuming pure rho contribution only, i.e. excluding the contribution from rho-omega  interference. Using B( rho0 --> pi+ pi- ) = 100%.


pdgid: M176R14
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010B also reports B(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0) x B(chi_c1(3872) --> J/psi omega) = 6+-3+-1E-6.


pdgid: M176R14
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010B  reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> omega J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 6+-2+-1E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R15
text:
AAIJ 2023S  reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> omega J/psi(1S))/G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-)] = 1.9+-0.4+-0.3E-2 which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-) = 1.53+-0.12E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R15
text:
Statistical and systematic errors added in quadrature. Uses the values of B(B --> chi_c1(3872) K) x B(chi_c1(3872) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) reported in AUBERT 2008Y, taking into account the common systematics.


pdgid: M176R26
text:
AAIJ 2017BB reports B(b --> chi_c1(3872)  anything) x  B(chi_c1(3872) --> phi phi) < 4.5E-7 at 95% CL.


pdgid: M176R12
text:
GOKHROO 2006   reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> D0 Dbar0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 1.02+-0.31+0.21-0.29E-4 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R12
text:
CHISTOV 2004   reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> D0 Dbar0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 0.6E-4 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R13
text:
HIRATA 2023   reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 0.97+0.21-0.18+-0.10E-4 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R13
text:
AUSHEV 2010   reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 0.77+-0.16+-0.10E-4 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R13
text:
AUBERT 2008B  reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 1.67+-0.36+-0.47E-4 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R09
text:
WICHT 2008   reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma gamma)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 2.4E-5 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R3
text:
CHISTOV 2004   reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> D0 Dbar0)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 6E-5 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R4
text:
CHISTOV 2004   reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> D+ D-)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 4E-5 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R23
text:
BHARDWAJ 2019   reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi0 chi_c1)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 8.1E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R22
text:
VINOKUROVA 2015   reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 3.0E-5 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R00
text:
BHARDWAJ 2016   reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- chi_c1)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 1.5E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R03
text:
AAIJ 2017AD reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 0.5E-8 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R03
text:
AAIJ 2013S  reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 1.7E-8 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R7
text:
BHARDWAJ 2011   reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 1.78+0.48-0.44+-0.12E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R7
text:
AUBERT 2009B  reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 2.8+-0.8+-0.1E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R7
text:
AUBERT,BE 2006M  reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 3.3+-1.0+-0.3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R08
text:
BHARDWAJ 2013   reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma chi_c1)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 1.9E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R01
text:
BHARDWAJ 2013   reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma chi_c2)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 6.7E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R10
text:
From 36.4+-9.0 events of chi_c1(3872) --> J/psi gamma decays with a statistical significance of 4.4sigma.


pdgid: M176R10
text:
AUBERT 2009B  reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma psi(2S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 9.5+-2.7+-0.6E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R11
text:
AAIJ 2024AD reports this ratio as 1.67+-0.21+-0.12+-0.04 where the last uncertainty is  due to the uncertainties of the branching fractions of psi(2S) and J/psi mesons. We have  added the last two uncertainties in quadrature.


pdgid: M176R11
text:
From 36.4+-9.0 events of chi_c1(3872) --> J/psi gamma decays with a statistical significance of 4.4sigma.  Superseded by AAIJ 2024AD.


pdgid: M176R36
text:
Using B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.343+-0.010. We have assumed that  B(psi_2(3823) --> gamma chi_c1) = 1.


pdgid: M176R2
text:
IWASHITA 2014 also scans the eta J/psi mass range 3.8 -- 4.75 GeV and sets upper  limits for B(B+- --> chi_c1(3872) K+-)xB(chi_c1(3872) --> eta J/psi) in 5 MeV intervals.


pdgid: M176R2
text:
IWASHITA 2014   reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> eta J/psi)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 3.8E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


