(January 12, 2026):
$\tau^-$ DECAY MODES values should read:
$\mu^- \bar{\nu}_\mu \nu_\tau$ $\phantom{\pi^0 \nu_\tau (ex. K^0)}$      $(17.37 \pm 0.04)$%
$e^- \bar{\nu}_e \nu_\tau$ $\phantom{\pi^0 \nu_\tau (ex. K^0)}$       $(17.85 \pm 0.04)$%
$K^- \nu_\tau$ $\phantom{\pi^0 \nu_\tau (ex. K^0) a}$       $(6.97 \pm 0.10) \times 10^{-3}$
$h^- >= 3 \pi^0 \nu_\tau$ (ex. $K^0$)    $(1.26 \pm 0.07)$%
$h^- h^- h^+\nu_\tau$ (ex. $K^0$) $\phantom{\pi^0}$    $(9.45 \pm 0.05)$%
$h^- h^- h^+\nu_\tau$ (ex. $K^0$, $\omega$)     $(9.42 \pm 0.05)$%
$K^- \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0 \nu_\tau$ (ex. $K^0$)   $(8.0 \pm 1.2) \times 10^{-4}$

(January 15, 2026):
$-$ $\tau^-$ DECAY MODES values should read:
$\Gamma_{3}$   $\mu^- \bar{\nu}_\mu \nu_\tau$ $\phantom{\pi^0 \nu_\tau (ex. K^0)}$       $(17.37 \pm 0.04)$%
$\Gamma_{5}$   $e^- \bar{\nu}_e \nu_\tau$ $\phantom{\pi^0 \nu_\tau (ex. K^0)}$        $(17.85 \pm 0.04)$%
$\Gamma_{10}$   $K^- \nu_\tau$ $\phantom{\pi^0 \nu_\tau (ex. K^0) a}$       $(6.97 \pm 0.10) \times 10^{-3}$
$\Gamma_{25}$   $h^- >= 3 \pi^0 \nu_\tau$ (ex. $K^0$)    $(1.26 \pm 0.07)$%
$\Gamma_{65}$   $h^- h^- h^+\nu_\tau$ (ex. $K^0$) $\phantom{\pi^0}$    $(9.45 \pm 0.05)$%
$\Gamma_{66}$   $h^- h^- h^+\nu_\tau$ (ex. $K^0$, $\omega$)     $(9.42 \pm 0.05)$%
$\Gamma_{100}$   $K^- \pi^+ \pi^- \pi^0 \nu_\tau$ (ex. $K^0$)   $(8.0 \pm 1.2) \times 10^{-4}$
$-$ $x_3$, $x_5$ columns of the CONSTRAINED FIT INFORMATION correlation coefficients values have been corrected;
$-$ OUR FIT values in the data blocks below should read:
$\Gamma_{3}/\Gamma$     $(17.37 \pm 0.04)$%   OUR FIT
$\Gamma_{5}/\Gamma$     $(17.85 \pm 0.04)$%   OUR FIT
$\Gamma_{3}/\Gamma_{5}$    $(97.30 \pm 0.22)\times 10^{-2}$   OUR FIT
$\Gamma_{8}/\Gamma_{5}$    $(64.50 \pm 0.32)\times 10^{-2}$   OUR FIT
$\Gamma_{9}/\Gamma_{5}$    $(60.60 \pm 0.31)\times 10^{-2}$   OUR FIT
$\Gamma_{10}/\Gamma$    $(0.697 \pm 0.010)$%   OUR FIT
$\Gamma_{10}/\Gamma_{5}$   $(3.90 \pm 0.05)\times 10^{-2}$   OUR FIT
$\Gamma_{25}/\Gamma$     $(1.26 \pm 0.07)$%   OUR FIT
$\Gamma_{65}/\Gamma$     $(9.45 \pm 0.05)$%   OUR FIT
$\Gamma_{66}/\Gamma$     $(9.42 \pm 0.05)$%   OUR FIT
$\Gamma_{91}/\Gamma_{68}$   $(4.85 \pm 0.08)$%   OUR FIT
$\Gamma_{100}/\Gamma$    $(8.0 \pm 1.2)\times 10^{-4}$   OUR FIT

(August 22, 2025):
- "Linear Coefficient of $\pi^0$ Electromagnetic Form Factor" data block should begin with:

VALUE ($10^{-2}$)	EVTS	DOCUMENT ID	TECN	COMMENT
$3.32 \pm 0.29$   OUR AVERAGE
$3.0 \pm 1.0$	0.4M	$^1$ADLARSON 17A	SPEC	$\gamma p \to \pi^0 p$, $\pi^0 \to e^+ e^- \gamma$
(...)

$^1$ADLARSON 17A use the A2 tagged photon facility at the Mainz Microtron, MAMI to meaasure $\pi^0$ Dalitz decay. The error is the total estimated experimental uncertainty.

(January 6, 2026):
The paragraph below Eq. (21.71) should refer to "Fig. 6 of [171]";
The reference [171] should be listed as [arXiv:2509.08099] publication;