Errata for the 2020 Review of Particle Physics
During the time between editions of the
Review of Particle Physics and the
Particle Physics Booklet, we often find a number of errata. We correct most errata on our WWW pages. If you should find errata that are not known to us, please send mail to
pdg @ lbl.gov.
For errata in previous editions, please see:
http://pdg.lbl.gov/rpp-archive/
Errata for the 2020 Edition:
Pages 27, 4 of the Web versions below:
-
(September 2, 2020):
Removed obsolete footnote to $K^+ \to \pi^- \mu^+ \mu^+$ decay;
|
Pages 86, 21 of the Web versions below:
-
(August 31, 2020):
$B^+ \to \pi^+ f_{2}(1270)$ decay branching fraction should read: $(2.2^{+0.7}_{-0.4}) \times 10^{-6}$ ;
|
Page 12 of the Web version below:
-
(September 3, 2020):
The CONSTRAINED FIT INFORMATION should list details as:
fit to 87 branching ratios uses 170 measurements; 125 degrees of freedom.
|
Pages 1109, 1122 of the full Review (pages 9, 53 of the the Web version below):
-
(September 3, 2020):
- $\Gamma_{114}$, ($\pi^- e^- e^+ \nu_{\tau}$) decay fraction should read: seen;
- In $\Gamma(\pi^- e^- e^+ \nu_{\tau})/\Gamma_{\text{total}}$, i.e. $\Gamma_{114}/\Gamma$ data block
a new measurement should read:
| VALUE | EVTS | DOCUMENT ID | TECN | COMMENT |
| seen | 400 | $^1$ JIN 19 | BELL | 562 fb$^{-1} E^{ee}_{cm}$ = 10.6 GeV |
| ... We do not user the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc... |
|
Page 10 of the Web version below:
-
(September 2, 2020):
Removed obsolete footnote to $\Gamma_{47}$ decay $K^+ \to \pi^- \mu^+ \mu^+$;
|
Pages 17, 129 of the Web version below:
-
(August 31, 2020):
- $B^+ \to \pi^+ f_{2}(1270)$ decay branching fraction should read: $(2.2^{+0.7}_{-0.4}) \times 10^{-6}$ ;
- In $\Gamma(\pi^+ f_{2}(1270))/\Gamma_{\text total}$ [$\Gamma_{\text 467}/\Gamma$] OUR AVERAGE should read: $2.2^{+0.7}_{-0.4}$ ($\times 10^{-6})$ ;
- AAIJ 2019AL measurement value should read: $17.0\pm 2.4\pm 2.1$ ($\times 10^{-6})$ ;
- Footnote [1] to AAIJ 2019AL measurement should list B($f_{2}(1270) \to K \overline{K}) = (4.6^{+0.5}_{-0.4})\%$ ;
|
Pages 63, 64, 65 of the Web version below:
-
(September 10, 2020):
In "CP Violation phase $\beta_s$" data block:
- OUR AVERAGE should read: $2.6 \pm1.4$ ($10^{-2}$ rad);
- The first measurement should be AAIJ 19AF;
- The first measurement below the ".. We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. ..."
line should be AAIJ 19AP;
- The order of footnotes has changed due to the change of AAIJ 19AF and AAIJ 19AP listing positions;
|
Page 6 of the Web version below:
-
(August 28, 2020):
The last sentence should list 0.8414(19) fm as the 2018 CODATA proton charge radius value.
|
Page 5 of the Web version below:
-
(September 14, 2020):
Neutron "$n$ Electric Dipole Moment" entry of "PENDLEBURY 15" Comment should state: Supersedes BAKER 06.
|
Page 32 of the Web version review below:
-
(August 27, 2020):
- In eq. (10.72b) the denominator of the prefactor of the second term no the rhs should read: $\widehat c_Z\widehat s_Z$.
- In eq. (10.72c) the prefactor of the second term on the rhs should read: $\frac{\widehat c_Z}{\widehat s_Z}$.
|
Page 1 of the Web version review below:
-
(September 14, 2020):
The Revised date should state: August 2019.
|
Page 27 of the Web version review below:
-
(August 27, 2020):
Reference [52] should read: S. Weinberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 1 (1989).
|
Pages 1, 7 of the Web version review below:
-
(September 14, 2020):
- The affiliations of G.F. Smoot should read: (HKUST; Paris U.; UC Berkeley; LBNL) ;
- The reference in the last sentence before section 29.5.2 should read: (see Sec. 29.7) ;
|
Page 16 of the Web version review below:
-
(September 4, 2020):
The second sentence of Calibration
section starting with "Time calibration is achieved ..."
has been slightly modified to clarify the calibration procedure.
|
Page 970 of the full Review (pages 24, 25 of the Web version review below):
-
(August 25, 2020):
References [102], [104], [112], [126], [134], [151] should list Report Number. |
Page 6 of the Web version review below:
-
(September 8, 2020):
In Table 69.4 the "No CP Violation" entry of 2007 Belle should be marked by an asterisk and listed below the horizontal line.
|
The review below:
-
(September 1, 2020):
Added references [2], [3] and included a sentence referencing them.
|
The review below:
-
(September 1, 2020):
The review should have a chapter number 83.
|
The review below:
-
(September 2, 2020):
Replaced with the revised version that was published in the full Review.
|
All pages © 2020 Regents of the University of California
