Errata for the 2006 Review of Particle Physics
During the time between editions of the Review of Particle Physics and the Particle Physics Booklet, we often find a number of errata. We correct most errata on our WWW pages. If you should find errata that are not known to us, please send mail to pdg @ lbl.gov.
Page 2 of the DataBooklet:
-
(November 10, 2006):
The following Summary Tables of Particle Physics entries should read:
Quarks .................................................. 24
Mesons ................................................. 26
Baryons* ............................................. 131
Searches .............................................. 159
Tests of conservation laws* ................. 164
|
Page 32 of the full Review
(page 11 of the DataBooklet, page 3 of the Web version below):
-
(September 15, 2006):
- The decay mode of Z to B+ X should have a value (6.03 ± 0.15)%.
- The decay mode of Z to Bs0 X should have a value (1.55 ± 0.13)%.
|
Page 33 of the full Review
(page 14 of the DataBooklet, page 1 of the Web version below):
-
(April 27, 2007):
The value of the muon magnetic moment CPT-violating asymmetry
(gμ+ − gμ-) / gaverage
should be (− 0.11 ± 0.12) x 10-8
|
Page 35 of the full Review
(page 22 of the DataBooklet, page 9 of the Web version below):
-
(August 30, 2007):
The Number of Neutrino Types from direct measurement should read:
Number N = 2.93 ± 0.05 (S = 1.2) (Direct measurement of invisible Z width)
|
Page 37 of the full Review
(page 27 of the DataBooklet,
--- page 3 of the Web version below, page 3 of the Web version of Light Unflavored Mesons):
-
(April 27, 2007):
The decay mode of η → "other neutral modes" should have no limit value associated with it.
|
Page 37 of the full Review
(page 28 of the DataBooklet,
--- page 3 of the Web version below, page 3 of the Web version of Light Unflavored Mesons):
-
(May 2, 2007):
The C-violating decay mode of η → 3γ should have a limit value of < 1.6 x 10-5.
|
Page 40 of the full Review
(page 37 of the DataBooklet,
--- page 12 of the Web version below, page 12 of the Web version of Light Unflavored Mesons):
-
(May 1, 2007):
The value of the full width of ρ(1450) should be Γ = 171 ± 50 MeV.
|
Page 46 of the full Review
(page 57 of the DataBooklet,
--- page 33 of the Web version below, page 3 of the Web version of Charmed Mesons):
-
(October 13, 2006):
The value of the branching fraction
D+ → K− π+ π+ π0
should read: (6.00 ± 0.28)% (S=1.1).
|
Page 47 of the full Review
(page 61 of the DataBooklet,
--- page 36 of the Web version below, page 6 of the Web version of Charmed Mesons):
-
(October 2, 2006):
The entry of ( Γ(D10) − Γ(D20) ) / Γ = 2y
should have a value of (1.4 ± 1.0) x 10-2.
|
Page 56 of the full Review
(page 88 of the DataBooklet,
--- page 65 of the Web version below, page 14 of the Web version of Bottom Mesons only):
-
(October 11, 2006):
The entry of ACP(B0 → K+ π− π0)
should not be marked as "non-resonant".
|
Page 56 of the full Review
(page 88 of the DataBooklet,
--- page 65 of the Web version below, page 14 of the Web version of Bottom Mesons only):
-
(September 6, 2006):
The entries |&lambda| (B0 --> D*+ D*-) and Im(&lambda) (B0 --> D*+ D*-)
should be named C(D*+ D*-) (B0 --> D*+ D*-) and S(D*+ D*-) (B0 --> D*+ D*-).
|
Page 56 of the full Review
(page 91 of the DataBooklet,
--- page 68 of the Web version below, page 17 of the Web version of Bottom Mesons only):
-
(October 9, 2006):
The value of the branching fraction of B0 → D− π+
should read (2.83 ± 0.17) x 10-3.
|
Page 58 of the full Review
(page 95 of the DataBooklet,
--- page 73 of the Web version below, page 22 of the Web version of Bottom Mesons only):
- (September 20, 2007):
- The decay of B0 to K−π+π+π−
should read: K+π−π+π−
- The decay of B0 to K−a1(1260)+
should read: K+a1(1260)−
|
Page 62 of the full Review
(page 110 of the DataBooklet,
--- page 88 of the Web version below, page 3 of the Web version of c-cBar Mesons only):
-
(November 16, 2006):
The decay of J/ψ(1S) to Ξ(1530)0 Ξ 0
branching fraction should read: ( 3.2 ± 1.4 ) x 10-4.
|
Page 62 of the full Review
(page 111 of the DataBooklet,
--- page 89 of the Web version below, page 4 of the Web version of c-cBar Mesons only):
-
(November 15, 2006):
The radiative decay of J/ψ(1S) to γ η(1405/1475) → γ γ ρ0
branching fraction
should read: ( 7.8 ± 2.0 ) x 10-5.
|
Page 63 of the full Review
(page 113 of the DataBooklet,
--- page 92 of the Web version below, page 7 of the Web version of c-cBar Mesons only):
-
(May 4, 2007):
The hadronic decay χc0(1P) → p p branching fraction
should have a value (2.16 ± 0.19) x 10-4.
|
Page 67 of the full Review
(page 125 of the DataBooklet,
--- page 104 of the Web version below, page 5 of the Web version of b-bBar Mesons only):
-
(June 6, 2007):
- The decay Upsilon(4S) → B+ B− branching fraction should have a value of
(50.9 ± 0.7)%
- The decay Upsilon(4S) → B0 B0
branching fraction should have a value of (49.1 ± 0.7)%
|
Page 69 of the full Review
(page 1 of the Web version below):
-
(August 31, 2006):
The second entry named Upsilon(2S) in b-bbar section of the table should read Upsilon(1D).
|
Page 70 of the full Review
(page 1 of the Web version below):
-
(August 31, 2006):
The second entry named Sigma_c(2520) in the last column of the table should read Sigma_c(2800).
|
Page 71 of the full Review
(page 131 of the DataBooklet,
--- page 1 of the Web version below, page 1 of the Web version of N Baryons only):
-
(November 10, 2006):
Mean life limit for proton (p → invisible mode) should be τ > 2.1 x 1029 years.
|
Page 84 of the full Review
(page 161 of the DataBooklet, page 3 of the Web version below):
-
(June 08, 2007):
- Λ−LL(eeμμ) contact interaction scale limit should be:
Λ−LL(eeμμ) > 7.3 TeV;
- Λ−LL(eeττ) contact interaction scale limit should be:
Λ−LL(eeττ) > 7.2 TeV;
- Λ−LL(llll) contact interaction scale limit should be:
Λ−LL(llll) > 9.0 TeV;
|
Page 87 of the full Review (page 6 of the Web version below):
-
(May 2, 2007):
The branching fraction Γ(η → 3γ) / Γtotal
should have a limit value of < 1.6 x 10-5.
|
Page 89 of the full Review (page 10 of the Web version below):
-
(October 11, 2006):
The entry of ACP(B0 → K+ π− π0)
should not be marked as "non-resonant".
|
Page 89 of the full Review (page 14 of the Web version below):
-
(April 27, 2007):
The value of the muon magnetic moment asymmetry
(gμ+ − gμ-) / gaverage
should be (− 0.11 ± 0.12) x 10-8
|
Page 112 of the full Review
(page 7 of the Web version below):
-
(October 12, 2006):
The definition of Rτ at the beginning of the last paragraph of section 9.4 should be:
Rτ = 1 / B(τ → e ν ν) − 1.97256;
|
Page 115 of the full Review
(page 15 of the Web version below):
-
(October 12, 2006):
- The third sentence in section 9.10 should read:
"By comparing rates for these (1+1) and (2+1) or (2+1) and (3+1)
jet processes, a value of αs can be obtained."
- The measurement by H1 in the first paragraph of section 9.10 should read:
αs(MZ) = 0.1175 ± 0.0057 (expt.) ± 0.0053 (theor.) .
- The last sentence of the first paragraph of section 9.10 should read:
"The theoretical errors arise from scale choice, structure functions, and hadronization correction."
|
Page 118 of the full Review
(page 24 of the Web version below):
-
(October 12, 2006):
- Reference [157] should also list: Z. Nagy and Z. Trocsanyi,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 082001 (2001).
- The author of Reference [159] should read: T. Kluge.
|
Page 120 of the full Review
(page 6 of the Web version below):
-
(June 12, 2007):
Table 10.2 "Notation" should reflect that the "Value" is given for the square of sin(θW)
e.g.: (sW)2 = sin2θW ≈ 0.2231, etc.
|
Page 125 of the full Review
(page 19 of the Web version below):
-
(May 1, 2007):
In the last sentence of the paragraph following equation (10.46) the experimentally measured
width of W should be quoted as: ΓW = 2.141 ± 0.041 GeV.
|
Page 138 of the full Review
(page 2 of the Web version below):
-
(August 30, 2006):
The last paragraph before section 11.2 had missing references to later sections.
|
Page 166 of the full Review
(page 5 of the Web version below):
-
(August 01, 2007):
In the header of Table 14.2 the qq
quark-model assignments for isospin I=1 should read:
ud,
ud,
1/√2 (dd − uu)
|
Page 166 of the full Review
(page 5 of the Web version below):
-
(August 01, 2007):
In the header of Table 14.2 the qq
quark-model assignments for isospin I=1 should read:
ud,
ud,
1/√2 (dd − uu)
|
Page 187 of the full Review
(page 1 of the Web version below):
-
(June 26, 2007):
- Figure 16.6 caption should also list for ZEUS the referece:
S. Chekanov et al., Phys. Rev. D70, 052001 (2004);
- Figure 16.6 caption correction: C. Adloff et al., Eur. Phys. J.(accepted for publication) hep-ex/0304003
should be replaced by C. Adloff et al., Eur. Phys. J C30,1 (2003)
|
Page 188 of the full Review
(page 2 of the Web version below):
-
(June 26, 2007):
Figure 16.7 caption correction: The third sentence should refer to F2d:
"For the purpose of plotting, F2d has been multiplied by ..."
|
Page 190 of the full Review
(page 4 of the Web version below):
-
(June 26, 2007):
- Figure 16.9 caption a) should also list for ZEUS the referece:
S. Chekanov et al., Phys. Rev. D70, 052001 (2004),
and for H1 the referece:
C. Adolf et al., Eur. Phys. J. C30, 1 (2003);
- Figure 16.9 caption b) should state the Q2 bin ranges as:
from 1 (Q2 = 1.8 GeV2) to 11 (Q2 = 650 GeV2);
- Figure 16.9 caption b) should also list for ZEUS the referece:
S. Chekanov et al., Phys. Rev. D69, 012004 (2004),
and for H1 the reference: A. Aktas et al., Eur. Phys. J. C40, 349 (2005);
|
Page 191 of the full Review
(page 5 of the Web version below):
-
(June 26, 2007):
Figure 16.10 caption correction: C. Adloff et al., Eur. Phys. J.(accepted for publication) hep-ex/0304003
should be replaced by C. Adloff et al., Eur. Phys. J C30,1 (2003)
|
Page 192 of the full Review
(page 6 of the Web version below):
-
(June 26, 2007):
Figure 16.11 caption correction: C. Adloff et al., Eur. Phys. J.(accepted for publication) hep-ex/0304003
should be replaced by C. Adloff et al., Eur. Phys. J C30,1 (2003)
|
Page 193 of the full Review
(page 7 of the Web version below):
-
(June 26, 2007):
- Figure 16.12 caption should list the following Q2 range:
COMPAS (Q2 ∼ 1−100 GeV2); and the references:
Jlab-E99-117 − X. Zheng et al., Phys. Rev. C70, 065207 (2004)
COMPAS − E.S. Ageev et al., Phys. Lett. B612, 154 (2005),
- Figure 16.12 caption should contain the comment:
"Note: Data showing the spin-dependent structure function g1(x) in the resonance region and its transition
into the DIS regime can be found in R. Fatemi et al., (CLAS)
Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 222002 (2003)."
|
Page 194 of the full Review
(page 8 of the Web version below):
-
(June 26, 2007):
- Figure 16.13 caption should also list for ALEPH the reference:
A. Heister et al., Eur. Phys. J. C30, 145 (2003);
|
Page 250 of the full Review
(page 17 of the Web version below):
-
(June 06, 2007):
The vertical axis, Flux · E3, of figure 24.10 was missing a factor of 1024.
|
Page 250 of the DataBooklet:
-
(November 13, 2006):
The muon critical energy approximations at the bottom of the page should have units of GeV:
Ec = 5700 GeV / (Z + 1.47)0.838 (solids, liquids),
= 7980 GeV / (Z + 2.03)0.879 (gases).
|
Page 258 of the full Review
(page 237 of the DataBooklet, page 2 of the Web version below):
-
(August 30, 2006):
References range in the title of section 27.2 was corrected.
|
Page 260 of the full Review
(page 7 of the Web version below):
-
(August 30, 2006):
The first sentence of the paragraph starting with 'An additional ''Barakas correction''...' should read:
An additional ''Barakas correction'' zL1(&beta) makes the stopping power
for a negative particle somewhat smaller than for a positive particle
with the same mass and velocity.
|
Page 264 of the full Review
(page 246 of the DataBooklet, page 17 of the Web version below):
-
(August 29, 2007):
Equation 27.26 should read:
Nγ = d / X0 [ 4/3 ln( kmax / kmin) −
4( kmax − kmin) / 3E +
( k2max − k2min) / 2E2 ] .
|
Page 264 of the full Review
(page 18 of the Web version below):
-
(August 30, 2006):
Figure 27.13 was replaced with the corrected version of electron critical energy plot
(instead of probability of photon conversion to e+e- pair).
|
Page 307 of the full Review
(page 294 of the DataBooklet, page 19 of the Web version below):
-
(July 02, 2007):
In equation (32.45), the sign of tan(2φ) should be reversed.
|
Page 325 and following of the full Review
(page 310 and following of the DataBooklet,
page 2 and following of the Web version below):
- (September 24, 2007):
- The left hand side of the equation (39.5) should read: dσ / dΩ (q q' → q q').
- The left hand side of the equation (39.9) should read:
dσ / dΩ (q q → g g).
- The last right hand side numerator of the equation (39.26) should read: k2 + 3 mW2.
- The last right hand side numerator of the equation (39.27) should read: k2 + 3 mZ2.
- The authors of the reference [1] should read: J.F. Owens et al.
- (October 04, 2007):
- In the text after equation (39.28) the partial decay width limit should read:
Γ( H → WL WL ) = ( g2 / 64π2 ) ( mH3 / mW2 ) .
|
Pages 333, 1213 of the full Review
(page 6 of the Web version below):
-
(December 07, 2006):
The unit of the cross section σ(e+e- → hadrons)
axis of the top plot should be [mb].
|
Page 374 of the full Review
(page 23 of the Web version below):
-
(September 14, 2006):
- The decay mode Γ37 of Z to B+ X
should have a value (6.03 ± 0.15)%.
- The decay mode Γ38 of Z to Bs0 X
should have a value (1.55 ± 0.13)%.
|
Page 377 of the full Review
(page 36 of the Web version below):
Gauge and Higgs Boson Particle Listings
-
(September 14, 2006):
In the data block of Gamma(B+ X) / Gamma(hadrons) (i.e. Gamma-37 / Gamma-6)
OUR EVALUATION value should be 0.0863 ± 0.0022.
|
Page 378 of the full Review
(page 37 of the Web version below):
Gauge and Higgs Boson Particle Listings
-
(September 14, 2006):
In the data block of Gamma(B0_s X) / Gamma(hadrons) (i.e. Gamma-38 / Gamma-6)
OUR EVALUATION value should be 0.0221 ± 0.0019.
|
Page 439 of the full Review
(page 11 of the Web version below):
Lepton Particle Listings
-
(April 30, 2007):
- The measurements of (gμ − 2) / 2 should list BENNETT 04 value of
(11659203 ± 6 ± 5) x 10-10 for μ+.
- The measurements of the muon magnetic moment CPT-violating asymmetry
(gμ+ − gμ-) / gaverage
should list BENNETT 04 value of (− 0.11 ± 0.12) x 10-8.
|
Page 478 of the full Review
(page 3 of the Web version below):
Lepton Particle Listings
-
(August 31, 2007):
- OUR AVERAGE value of the "Number of Light ν Types From Direct Measurement of Invisible Z Width" should read:
2.93 ± 0.05 (OUR AVERAGE) Error includes scale factor of 1.2.
- The measurements in "Number of Light ν Types From Direct Measurement of Invisible Z Width" data block should also list:
3.23 ± 0.16 ± 0.10 AKERS 95C OPAL 1990-1992 LEP runs
|
Page 479 of the full Review
(page 5 of the Web version below):
Lepton Particle Listings
-
(August 31, 2007):
The list of "REFERENCES FOR Limits on Number of Neutrino Types" should also list:
AKERS 95C ZPHY C65 47 R. Akers et al. (OPAL Collab.)
|
Page 493 of the full Review
(page 33 of the Web version below, page 1 of the separate review):
Lepton Particle Listings
-
(June 11, 2007):
Equations (2) − (4) for the probability of appearance in an oscillation experiment should be:
P(νμ → νe) = sin2(2θ13)
sin2(θ23) sin2((Δm32)2 L / 4E)) (2)
P(νe → νμ) = sin2(2θ13)
sin2(θ23) sin2((Δm32)2 L / 4E)) (3)
P(νe → ντ) = sin2(2θ13)
cos2(θ23) sin2((Δm32)2 L / 4E)) (4)
|
Page 514 of the full Review
(page 7 of the Web version below):
Quark Particle Listings
-
(June 05, 2007):
The definition of "Q MASS RATIO" should read:
Q ≡ ( (ms2 − m 2) /
(md2 − mu2) )½
|
Page 514 of the full Review
(page 7 of the Web version below):
Quark Particle Listings
-
(June 05, 2007):
The definition of "Q MASS RATIO" should read:
Q ≡ ( (ms2 − m 2) /
(md2 − mu2) )½
|
Page 527 of the full Review
(page 15 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(July 23, 2007):
The value of the branching fraction ratio Γ(f0(980) γ) / Γ(a0(980) γ)
(i.e. Γ17 / Γ23)
of ALOISIO 02C (KLOE) measurement should be 6.1 ± 0.6.
|
Page 537 of the full Review
(page 2 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(November 14, 2006):
A sentence below equation (5) should quote C1 (= 0 ± 2.4) [6].
|
Page 542 of the full Review
(page 2 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(April 27, 2007):
The branching fraction Γ6 of η → "other neutral modes" should have no limit value
associated with it.
|
Page 542 of the full Review
(page 3 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(May 2, 2007):
The branching fraction Γ24 of η → 3γ should a limit value < 1.6 x 10-5.
|
Page 543 of the full Review
(page 8 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(April 27, 2007):
The branching fraction Γ(other neutral modes)/Γ [i.e. Γ6/Γ]
should have no listed measurements associated with it.
|
Page 544 of the full Review
(page 11 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(May 2, 2007):
The branching fraction limit Γ(3γ)/Γ [i.e. Γ24/Γ]
measurement of NEFKENS 05A should be proceeded by the line:
"We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc."
|
Page 599 of the full Review
(pages 3, 4 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(May 1, 2007):
- OUR AVERAGE value of ρ(1450) WIDTH should be 171 ± 50 MeV.
- The ideogram of ρ(1450) WIDTH (MeV) should not include ARMSTRONG 89E measurement.
|
Page 645 of the full Review
(page 6 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(June 11, 2007):
The quantum numbers of π(2070) should be IG(JPC) = 1−(0− +).
|
Page 646 of the full Review
(page 9 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(June 11, 2007):
The quantum numbers of π2(2245) should be IG(JPC) = 1−(2− +).
|
Page 647 of the full Review
(page 12 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(June 11, 2007):
The quantum numbers of π(2360) should be IG(JPC) = 1−(0− +).
|
Page 708 of the full Review
(page 3 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(October 13, 2006):
The value of the branching fraction Γ53 of D+ → K− π+ π+ π0
should read: (6.00 ± 0.28)% (S=1.1).
|
Page 733 of the full Review
(page 20 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(October 2, 2006):
The entry of ( Γ(D10) − Γ(D20) ) / Γ = 2y
should have a unit of 10-2.
|
Page 766 of the full Review
(page 5 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(September 5, 2006):
Paper by E. van Beveren, G. Rupp, EPJ C32, 493 (2004) should be listed
as OTHER RELATED PAPERS
|
Page 810 of the full Review
(page 7 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(October 10, 2006):
The value of the decay mode of B0 → D− π+
should read (2.83 ± 0.17) x 10-3.
|
Page 811 of the full Review
(page 12 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(September 20, 2007):
- The B0 decay mode Γ197
should read: K+π−π+π−
- The B0 decay mode Γ202
should read: K+a1(1260)−
|
Page 814 of the full Review
(pages 21, 22 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(October 10, 2006):
- The value of "OUR AVERAGE" for the decay mode Γ21 / Γ
[i.e. Γ(D− π+) / Γ]
should read 0.00283 ± 0.00017.
- The value of measurement by "AUBERT,B 04O" in Γ21 / Γ should read 0.00290 ± 0.00021 ± 0.00011.
- The first sentence of footnote 100 should read
"AUBERT,B 04O reports [B(B0 → D− π+) x
B(D+ → KS0 π+)] = (42.7 ± 2.1 ± 2.2) x 10-6. "
|
Page 826 of the full Review
(page 64/65 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(September 20, 2007):
- The B0 decay branching fraction Γ197 / Γ
should read: Γ( K+π−π+π− ) / Γtotal .
- The B0 decay branching fraction Γ202 / Γ
should read: Γ( K+a1(1260)− ) / Γtotal .
|
Page 844 of the full Review
(page 127 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(October 11, 2006):
The entry of ACP(B0 → K+ π− π0)
should not be marked as "non-resonant".
|
Page 895 of the full Review
(page 2 of the of the Web version below):
-
(November 16, 2006):
The decay of J/ψ(1S) to Ξ(1530)0 Ξ 0
branching fraction,
Γ43 , should read: ( 3.2 ± 1.4 ) x 10-4.
|
Page 896 of the full Review
(page 4 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(November 15, 2006):
The radiative decay of J/ψ(1S) to γ η(1405/1475) → γ γ ρ0
branching fraction,
Γ107 , should read: ( 7.8 ± 2.0 ) x 10-5.
|
Page 900 of the full Review
(page 18 of the of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(November 16, 2006):
The units of Γ(Ξ(1530)0 Ξ 0) /
Γtotal [Γ43 / Γ] measurement should read: 10-3.
|
Page 904 of the full Review
(page 31 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(November 15, 2006):
The units of Γ(γ η(1405/1475) → γ γ ρ0) /
Γtotal [Γ107 / Γ] measurements should read: 10-4.
|
Page 909 of the full Review
(page 3 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(May 4, 2007):
The hadronic decay χc0(1P) → p p branching fraction,
Γ34, should have a value (2.16 ± 0.19) x 10-4.
|
Page 918 of the full Review
(page 11 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(October 11, 2006):
The definition of electric octuple amplitude, a3, should read:
a3 = E3 / sqrt(E12 + M22 + E32) .
|
Page 932 of the full Review
(page 1 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(September 6, 2006):
Units of Y(3940) WIDTH should be MeV.
|
Page 946 of the full Review
(page 1 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(June 6, 2007):
- The decay Upsilon(4S) → B+ B− branching fraction, Γ2,
should have a value of (50.9 ± 0.7)%
- The decay Upsilon(4S) → B0 B0
branching fraction, Γ4, should have a value of (49.1 ± 0.7)%
|
Page 946 of the full Review
(page 3 of the Web version below):
Meson Particle Listings
-
(June 6, 2007):
- The branching ratio
Γ(B+ B−) / Γ(B0 B0),
Γ2/ Γ4, should have OUR EVALUATION value of 1.037 ± 0.029.
- The branching fraction
Γ(B+ B−) / Γtotal, Γ2/ Γ,
should have OUR EVALUATION value of 0.509 ± 0.007.
- The branching fraction
Γ(B0 B0) / Γtotal,
Γ4/ Γ, should have OUR EVALUATION value of 0.491 ± 0.007.
|
|